The Nature and Composition of the Internal Environment of the Developing Brain

1. The fetal brain develops within its own environment, which is protected from free exchange of most molecules among its extracellular fluid, blood plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by a set of mechanisms described collectively as brain barriers.2. There are high concentrations of proteins in fetal CSF, which are due not to immaturity of the blood–CSF barrier (tight junctions between the epithelial cells of the choroid plexus), but to a specialized transcellular mechanism that specifically transfers some proteins across choroid plexus epithelial cells in the immature brain.3. The proteins in CSF are excluded from the extracellular fluid of the immature brain by the presence of barriers at the CSF–brain interfaces on the inner and outer surfaces of the immature brain. These barriers are not present in the adult.4. Some plasma proteins are present within the cells of the developing brain. Their presence may be explained by a combination of specific uptake from the CSF and synthesis in situ. 5. Information about the composition of the CSF (electrolytes as well as proteins) in the developing brain is of importance for the culture conditions used for experiments with fetal brain tissue in vitro, as neurons in the developing brain are exposed to relatively high concentrations of proteins only when they have cell surface membrane contact with CSF.6. The developmental importance of high protein concentrations in CSF of the immature brain is not understood but may be involved in providing the physical force (colloid osmotic pressure) for expansion of the cerebral ventricles during brain development, as well as possibly having nutritive and specific cell development functions.     

Determinants of Passive Drug Entry into the Central Nervous System

1. The blood–brain barriers restrict the passive diffusion of many drugs into the brain and constitute a significant obstacle in the pharmacological treatment of central nervous system diseases and disorders. The degree of restriction they impose is variable, with some lipid-insoluble drugs effectively excluded from the brain, while many lipid-soluble drugs do not appear to be subject to any restriction.2. The ease with which any particular drug diffuses across the blood–brain barrier is determined largely by the number and strength of intermolecular forces holding it to surrounding water molecules. By quantifying the molecular features that contribute to these forces, it is possible to predict the in vivo blood–brain barrier permeability of a drug from its molecular structure. Dipolarity, polarizability, and hydrogen bonding ability are factors that appear to reduce permeability, whereas molecular volume (size) and molar refraction are associated with increased permeability.3. Increasing the passive entry of restricted drugs into the central nervous system can be achieved by disrupting the blood–brain barrier (increased paracellular diffusion) or by modifying the structure of restricted drugs to temporarily or permanently increase their lipid solubility (increased transcellular permeability).4. Competitive inhibition of outwardly directed active efflux mechanisms (P-glycoprotein and MRP, the multidrug resistance-related protein) can also significantly increase the accumulation of certain drugs within the central nervous system.     

Brain microvascular P-glycoprotein and a revised model of multidrug resistance in brain

1. P-Glycoprotein is a 170-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein active efflux system that confers multidrug resistance in tumors, as well as normal tissues including brain.2. The classical model of multidrug resistance in brain places the expression of P-glycoprotein at the luminal membrane of the brain microvascular endothelial cell. However, recent studies have been performed with human brain microvessels and double-labeling confocal microscopy using (a) the MRK16 antibody to human P-glycoprotein, (b) an antiserum to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), an astrocyte foot process marker, or (c) an antiserum to the GLUT1 glucose transporter, a brain endothelial plasma membrane marker. These results provide evidence for a revised model of P-glycoprotein function at the brain microvasculature. In human brain capillaries, there is colocalization of immunoreactive P-glycoprotein with astrocytic GFAP but not with endothelial GLUT1 glucose transporter.3. In the revised model of multidrug resistance in brain, P-glycoprotein is hypothesized to function at the plasma membrane of astrocyte foot processes. These astrocyte foot processes invest the brain microvascular endothelium but are located behind the blood–brain barrier in vivo, which is formed by the brain capillary endothelial plasma membrane.4. In the classical model, an inhibition of endothelial P-glycoprotein would result in both an increase in the blood–brain barrier permeability to a given drug substrate of P-glycoprotein and an increase in the brain volume of distribution (V _D) of the drug. However, in the revised model of P-glycoprotein function in brain, which positions this protein transporter at the astrocyte foot process, an inhibition of P-glycoprotein would result in no increase in blood–brain barrier permeability, per se, but only an increase in the V _D in brain of P-glycoprotein substrates.     

Dynamics of CNS Barriers: Evolution,Differentiation, and Modulation

Summary 1. Three main barrier layers at the interface between blood and tissue protect the central nervous system (CNS): the endothelium of brain capillaries, and the epithelia of the choroid plexus (CP) and the arachnoid. The classical work on these barriers in situ until the 1970s laid the foundations for modern understanding. Techniques for brain endothelial cell isolation and culture pioneered by Ferenc Joó in the 1970s opened up new fields of examination, enabling study of mechanisms at the cellular and molecular level.2. Astrocytic glial cells are closely associated with the brain endothelial barrier. During evolution the barrier appears to have shifted from the glial to the endothelial layer, in parallel with the increasing importance of the microvasculature and its regulation. Vestiges of the barrier potential of glia remain in the modern mammalian CNS.3. Evolutionary evidence suggests that the advantage derived from ionic homeostasis around central synapses was the major selective pressure leading to refinement of CNS barrier systems. This is one element of the modern multitasking barrier function.4. While epithelia are constitutively able to form barriers at appropriate interfaces, the default condition for endothelia is more leaky; inductive influences from associated cells especially astrocytes are important in generating the full blood–brain barrier (BBB) phenotype in brain capillaries. The underlying mechanisms are being elucidated at the molecular and genomics level.5. The barrier layers of the nervous system can be modulated by a number of receptor-mediated processes, involving several signal transduction pathways, both calcium dependent and independent. Some agents acting as inducers in the long term can act as modulators in the short-term, with some overlap of signaling pathways. Modulating agents may be derived both from the blood and from cells associated with cerebral vessels. Less is known about the modulation of the CP.6. The challenge for the next era of CNS barrier studies will be to apply new knowledge from proteomics and genomics to understanding the in vivo condition in physiology and pathology.This revised article was published online in May 2005 with a February 2005 cover date.     

Cyclic AMP induces phosphorylation of claudin-5 immunoprecipitates and expression of claudin-5 gene in blood-brain-barrier endothelial cells via protein kinase A-dependent and -independent pathways

Cyclic AMP (cAMP) promotes functions of tight junctions in endothelial cells, although its target remains unknown. We showed here that cAMP increased gene expression of claudin-5 and decreased that of claudin-1 in porcine blood-brain-barrier endothelial cells via protein kinase A (PKA)-independent and -dependent pathways, respectively. cAMP also enhanced immunoreactivity of claudin-5 along cell borders and in the cytoplasm, reorganized actin filaments, and altered signals of claudin-5, occludin, ZO-1, and ZO-2 along cell boundaries from zipperlike to linear patterns. In contrast, claudin-1 was detected only in the cytoplasm in a dotlike pattern, and its immunolabeling was reduced by cAMP. Interestingly, 31- and 62-kDa claudin-5 immunoprecipitates in the NP-40-soluble and -insoluble fractions, respectively, were highly phosphorylated on threonine residue(s) upon cAMP treatment. All these changes induced by cAMP, except for claudin-5 expression and its signals in the cytoplasm, were reversed by an inhibitor of PKA, H-89. We also demonstrated that cAMP elevated the barrier function of tight junctions in porcine blood-brain-barrier endothelial cells in PKA-dependent and -independent manners. These findings indicate that both PKA-induced phosphorylation of claudin-5 immunoprecipitates and cAMP-dependent but PKA-independent induction of claudin-5 expression could be involved in promotion of tight-junction function in endothelial cells.     

Osmotic Opening of the Blood–Brain Barrier: Principles, Mechanism, and Therapeutic Applications

1. Osmotic opening of the blood–brain barrier by intracarotid infusion of a hypertonic arabinose or mannitol solution is mediated by vasodilatation and shrinkage of cerebrovascular endothelial cells, with widening of the interendothelial tight junctions to an estimated radius of 200 Å. The effect may be facilitated by calcium-mediated contraction of the endothelial cytoskeleton.2. The marked increase in apparent blood–brain barrier permeability to intravascular substances (10-fold for small molecules) following the osmotic procedure is due to both increased diffusion and bulk fluid flow across the tight junctions. The permeability effect is largely reversed within 10 min.3. In experimental animals, the osmotic method has been used to grant wide access to the brain of water-soluble drugs, peptides, antibodies, boron compounds for neutron capture therapy, and viral vectors for gene therapy. The method also has been used together with anticancer drugs to treat patients with metastatic or primary brain tumors, with some success and minimal morbidity.     

Neural Induction of the Blood–Brain Barrier: Still an Enigma

1. The study of the blood–brain barrier and its various realms offers a myriad of opportunities for scientific exploration. This review focuses on two of these areas in particular: the induction of the blood–brain barrier and the molecular mechanisms underlying this developmental process.2. The creation of the blood–brain barrier is considered a specific step in the differentiation of cerebral capillary endothelial cells, resulting in a number of biochemical and functional alterations. Although the specific endothelial properties which maintain the homeostasis in the central nervous system necessary for neuronal function have been well described, the inductive mechanisms which trigger blood–brain barrier establishment in capillary endothelial cells are unknown.3. The timetable of blood–brain barrier formation is still a matter of debate, caused largely by the use of varying experimental systems and by the general difficulty of quantitatively measuring the degree of blood–brain barrier tightness. However, there is a general consensus that a gradual formation of the blood–brain barrier starts shortly after intraneural neovascularization and that the neural microenvironment (neurons and/or astrocytes) plays a key role in inducing blood–brain barrier function in capillary endothelial cells. This view stems from numerous in vitro experiments using mostly cocultures of capillary endothelial cells and astrocytes and assays for easily measurable blood–brain barrier markers. In vivo, there are great difficulties in proving the inductive influence of the neuronal environment. Also dealt with in this article are brain tumors, the least understood in vivo systems, and the induction or noninduction of barrier function in the newly established tumor vascularization.4. Finally, this review tries to elucidate the question concerning the nature of the inductive signal eliciting blood–brain barrier formation in the cerebral microvasculature.     

Inflammatory Mediators and Modulation of Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability

1. Unlike some interfaces between the blood and the nervous system (e.g., nerve perineurium), the brain endothelium forming the blood–brain barrier can be modulated by a range of inflammatory mediators. The mechanisms underlying this modulation are reviewed, and the implications for therapy of the brain discussed.2. Methods for measuring blood–brain barrier permeability in situ include the use of radiolabeled tracers in parenchymal vessels and measurements of transendothelial resistance and rate of loss of fluorescent dye in single pial microvessels. In vitro studies on culture models provide details of the signal transduction mechanisms involved.3. Routes for penetration of polar solutes across the brain endothelium include the paracellular tight junctional pathway (usually very tight) and vesicular mechanisms. Inflammatory mediators have been reported to influence both pathways, but the clearest evidence is for modulation of tight junctions.4. In addition to the brain endothelium, cell types involved in inflammatory reactions include several closely associated cells including pericytes, astrocytes, smooth muscle, microglia, mast cells, and neurons. In situ it is often difficult to identify the site of action of a vasoactive agent. In vitro models of brain endothelium are experimentally simpler but may also lack important features generated in situ by cell:cell interaction (e.g. induction, signaling).5. Many inflammatory agents increase both endothelial permeability and vessel diameter, together contributing to significant leak across the blood–brain barrier and cerebral edema. This review concentrates on changes in endothelial permeability by focusing on studies in which changes in vessel diameter are minimized.6. Bradykinin (Bk)² increases blood–brain barrier permeability by acting on B₂ receptors. The downstream events reported include elevation of [Ca²⁺]_i, activation of phospholipase A₂, release of arachidonic acid, and production of free radicals, with evidence that IL-1 potentiates the actions of Bk in ischemia.7. Serotonin (5HT) has been reported to increase blood–brain barrier permeability in some but not all studies. Where barrier opening was seen, there was evidence for activation of 5-HT₂ receptors and a calcium-dependent permeability increase.8. Histamine is one of the few central nervous system neurotransmitters found to cause consistent blood–brain barrier opening. The earlier literature was unclear, but studies of pial vessels and cultured endothelium reveal increased permeability mediated by H₂ receptors and elevation of [Ca²⁺]_i and an H₁ receptor-mediated reduction in permeability coupled to an elevation of cAMP.9. Brain endothelial cells express nucleotide receptors for ATP, UTP, and ADP, with activation causing increased blood–brain barrier permeability. The effects are mediated predominantly via a P_2U (P2Y₂) G-protein-coupled receptor causing an elevation of [Ca²⁺]_i; a P2Y₁ receptor acting via inhibition of adenyl cyclase has been reported in some in vitro preparations.10. Arachidonic acid is elevated in some neural pathologies and causes gross opening of the blood–brain barrier to large molecules including proteins. There is evidence that arachidonic acid acts via generation of free radicals in the course of its metabolism by cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways.11. The mechanisms described reveal a range of interrelated pathways by which influences from the brain side or the blood side can modulate blood–brain barrier permeability. Knowledge of the mechanisms is already being exploited for deliberate opening of the blood–brain barrier for drug delivery to the brain, and the pathways capable of reducing permeability hold promise for therapeutic treatment of inflammation and cerebral edema.     

Claudin‐5a in developing zebrafish brain barriers: another brick in the wall

Claudins serve essential roles in regulating paracellular permeability properties within occluding junctions. Recent studies have begun to elucidate developmental roles of claudins within immature tissues. This work has uncovered an involvement of several claudins in determining tight junction properties that have an effect on embryonic morphogenesis and physiology. During zebrafish brain morphogenesis, Claudin‐5a determines the paracellular permeability of tight junctions within a transient neuroepithelial‐ventricular barrier that maintains the hydrostatic fluid pressure required for brain ventricular lumen expansion. However, the roles of Claudins in development may well extend beyond being mere junctional components. Several post‐translational modifications of Claudins have been characterized that indicate a direct regulation by developmental signals. This review focuses on the involvement of Claudin‐5a in cerebral barrier formation in the zebrafish embryo and includes some speculations about possible modes of regulation.     

Human Cerebral Microvessel Endothelial Cell Culture as a Model System to Study the Blood–Brain Interface in Ischemic/Hypoxic Conditions

Summary 1. Cerebral ischemia and reperfusion induce several changes on the endothelial cells at the microcirculatory level.2. Vasogenic brain edema due to compromised blood–brain barrier, transformation of the endothelial cell surface from an anticoagulant to a procoagulant property are important factors in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke.3. Release of prostaglandins, endothelin-1, complement proteins, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 by microvascular endothelial cells are other components in the complex mechanism of brain ischemia/hypoxia.4. Ultrastructural studies documented the opened paracellular avenues in the course of vasogenic edema in different experimental models.5. Tight junctions of endothelial cells have been characterized with freeze fracture electron microscopy, and the process of transvesiculation was analyzed using rapid freeze and freeze substitution procedure before electron microscopy studies.6. In endothelial cell-culture experiments, we used rodent and later human brains.7. Endothelial cells co-cultured with astroglia resulted in an elaborate tight junctional complex.8. This co-culture technique becomes the basis of in vitro blood–brain barrier studies. On endothelial cells of human brain origin, different regulatory factors found to be responsible for the complex mechanism of ischemic stroke.This paper is dedicated to the memory of F. Joó, the good friend and pioneer in endothelial cell research.This revised article was published online in May 2005 with a February 2005 cover date.     

Measurement of blood-brain barrier permeation in rats during exposure to 2450-MHz microwaves

Adult rats anesthesized with pentobarbital and injected intravenously with a mixture of [¹⁴C]sucrose and [³H]inulin were exposed for 30 min to an environment at an ambient temperature of 22, 30, or 40 °C, or were exposed at 22 °C to 2450-MHz CW microwave radiation at power densities of 0, 10, 20, or 30 mW/cm². Following exposure, the brain was perfused and sectioned into eight regions, and the radioactivity in each region was counted. The data were analyzed by two methods. First, the data for each of the eight regions and for each of the two radioactive tracers were analyzed by regression analysis for a total of 16 analyses and Bonferroni's Inequality was applied to prevent false positive results from numerous analyses. By this conservative test, no statistically significant increase in permeation was found for either tracer in any brain region of rats exposed to microwaves. Second, a profile analysis was used to test for a general change in tracer uptake across all brain regions. Using this statistical method, a significant increase in permeation was found for sucrose but not for inulin. A correction factor was then derived from the warm-air experiments to correct for the increase in permeation of the brain associated with change in body temperature. This correction factor was applied to the data for the irradiated animals. After correcting the data for thermal effects of the microwave radiation, no significant increase in permeation was found.     

THE INTER-SERTOLI CELL TIGHT JUNCTIONS IN GERM CELL-FREE SEMINIFEROUS TUBULES FROM PRENATALLY IRRADIATED RATS: A FREEZE-FRACTURE STUDY

The tight junctions between Sertoli cells were examined by freeze-fracture in 3-month-old prenatally irradiated rats, whose seminiferous tubules are devoid of germ cells. The replicas from irradiated tubules show elaborate interdigitations of the lateral membranes of Sertoli cells and very extensive tight junctions. These junctions are characterized by a great number of continuous parallel or complex interweaving strands of intramembranous particles, preferentially associated with E fracture faces. The presence of highly cross-linked tight junctional strands is compatible with an epithelium deprived of germ cells, with a reduced need for flexibility. Anomalous ectoplasmic specializations, consisting of groups of cisternae arranged perpendicularly to the lateral surface, are found in the irradiated tubules. These structures may be involved in a storage mechanism of redundant lateral membrane resulting from the elimination of germ cells. Typical gap junctions, intercalated between the tight junctional strands, are larger and more frequently found in treated animals than in controls. These findings indicate that a very tight permeability barrier seems to be established in the irradiated testis even in the absence of germ cells. Thus, the formation and maintenance of Sertoli tight junctions do not appear to be directly dependent on the presence of germ cells. Nevertheless, the alterations detected in the tight junction architecture and in the ectoplasmic specializations indicate that maturing germ cells probably contribute to the functional organization of the blood—testis barrier in the normal testis.