The Nature and Composition of the Internal Environment of the Developing Brain

1. The fetal brain develops within its own environment, which is protected from free exchange of most molecules among its extracellular fluid, blood plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by a set of mechanisms described collectively as brain barriers.2. There are high concentrations of proteins in fetal CSF, which are due not to immaturity of the blood–CSF barrier (tight junctions between the epithelial cells of the choroid plexus), but to a specialized transcellular mechanism that specifically transfers some proteins across choroid plexus epithelial cells in the immature brain.3. The proteins in CSF are excluded from the extracellular fluid of the immature brain by the presence of barriers at the CSF–brain interfaces on the inner and outer surfaces of the immature brain. These barriers are not present in the adult.4. Some plasma proteins are present within the cells of the developing brain. Their presence may be explained by a combination of specific uptake from the CSF and synthesis in situ. 5. Information about the composition of the CSF (electrolytes as well as proteins) in the developing brain is of importance for the culture conditions used for experiments with fetal brain tissue in vitro, as neurons in the developing brain are exposed to relatively high concentrations of proteins only when they have cell surface membrane contact with CSF.6. The developmental importance of high protein concentrations in CSF of the immature brain is not understood but may be involved in providing the physical force (colloid osmotic pressure) for expansion of the cerebral ventricles during brain development, as well as possibly having nutritive and specific cell development functions.     

The Choroid Plexuses and the Barriers Between the Blood and the Cerebrospinal Fluid

1. The fluid homeostasis of the brain depends both on the endothelial blood–brain barrier and on the epithelial blood–cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier located at the choroid plexuses and the outer arachnoid membrane.2. The brain has two fluid environments: the brain interstitial fluid, which surrounds the neurons and glia, and the CSF, which fills the ventricles and external surfaces of the central nervous system.3. CSF acts as a fluid cushion for the brain and as a drainage route for the waste products of cerebral metabolism.4. Recent findings suggest that CSF may also act as a third circulation conveying substances secreted into the CSF rapidly to many brain regions.     

Determinants of Passive Drug Entry into the Central Nervous System

1. The blood–brain barriers restrict the passive diffusion of many drugs into the brain and constitute a significant obstacle in the pharmacological treatment of central nervous system diseases and disorders. The degree of restriction they impose is variable, with some lipid-insoluble drugs effectively excluded from the brain, while many lipid-soluble drugs do not appear to be subject to any restriction.2. The ease with which any particular drug diffuses across the blood–brain barrier is determined largely by the number and strength of intermolecular forces holding it to surrounding water molecules. By quantifying the molecular features that contribute to these forces, it is possible to predict the in vivo blood–brain barrier permeability of a drug from its molecular structure. Dipolarity, polarizability, and hydrogen bonding ability are factors that appear to reduce permeability, whereas molecular volume (size) and molar refraction are associated with increased permeability.3. Increasing the passive entry of restricted drugs into the central nervous system can be achieved by disrupting the blood–brain barrier (increased paracellular diffusion) or by modifying the structure of restricted drugs to temporarily or permanently increase their lipid solubility (increased transcellular permeability).4. Competitive inhibition of outwardly directed active efflux mechanisms (P-glycoprotein and MRP, the multidrug resistance-related protein) can also significantly increase the accumulation of certain drugs within the central nervous system.     

Breakdown of the blood–brain barrier to proteins in white matter of the developing brain following systemic inflammation

Compromised blood–brain barrier permeability resulting from systemic inflammation has been implicated as a possible cause of brain damage in fetuses and newborns and may underlie white matter damage later in life. Rats at postnatal day (P) 0, P8 and P20 and opossums (Monodelphis domestica) at P15, P20, P35, P50 and P60 and adults of both species were injected intraperitoneally with 0.2–10 mg/kg body weight of 055:B5 lipopolysaccharide. An acute-phase response occurred in all animals. A change in the permeability of the blood–brain barrier to plasma proteins during a restricted period of postnatal development in both species was determined immunocytochemically by the presence of proteins surrounding cerebral blood vessels and in brain parenchyma. Blood vessels in white matter, but not grey matter, became transiently permeable to proteins between 10 and 24 h after lipopolysaccharide injection in P0 and P8 rats and P35–P60 opossums. Brains of Monodelphis younger than P35, rats older than P20 and adults of both species were not affected. Permeability of the blood–cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier to proteins was not affected by systemic inflammation for at least 48 h after intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. These results show that there is a restricted period in brain development when the blood–brain barrier, but not the blood–CSF barrier, to proteins is susceptible to systemic inflammation; this does not appear to be attributable to barrier immaturity but to its stage of development and only occurs in white matter.This work was supported by NIH grant number R01 NS043949-01A1.     

Neural Induction of the Blood–Brain Barrier: Still an Enigma

1. The study of the blood–brain barrier and its various realms offers a myriad of opportunities for scientific exploration. This review focuses on two of these areas in particular: the induction of the blood–brain barrier and the molecular mechanisms underlying this developmental process.2. The creation of the blood–brain barrier is considered a specific step in the differentiation of cerebral capillary endothelial cells, resulting in a number of biochemical and functional alterations. Although the specific endothelial properties which maintain the homeostasis in the central nervous system necessary for neuronal function have been well described, the inductive mechanisms which trigger blood–brain barrier establishment in capillary endothelial cells are unknown.3. The timetable of blood–brain barrier formation is still a matter of debate, caused largely by the use of varying experimental systems and by the general difficulty of quantitatively measuring the degree of blood–brain barrier tightness. However, there is a general consensus that a gradual formation of the blood–brain barrier starts shortly after intraneural neovascularization and that the neural microenvironment (neurons and/or astrocytes) plays a key role in inducing blood–brain barrier function in capillary endothelial cells. This view stems from numerous in vitro experiments using mostly cocultures of capillary endothelial cells and astrocytes and assays for easily measurable blood–brain barrier markers. In vivo, there are great difficulties in proving the inductive influence of the neuronal environment. Also dealt with in this article are brain tumors, the least understood in vivo systems, and the induction or noninduction of barrier function in the newly established tumor vascularization.4. Finally, this review tries to elucidate the question concerning the nature of the inductive signal eliciting blood–brain barrier formation in the cerebral microvasculature.     

Tight Junctions of the Blood–Brain Barrier

1. The blood–brain barrier is essential for the maintainance and regulation of the neural microenvironment. The blood–brain barrier endothelial cells comprise an extremely low rate of transcytotic vesicles and a restrictive paracellular diffusion barrier. The latter is realized by the tight junctions between the endothelial cells of the brain microvasculature, which are subject of this review. Morphologically, blood–brain barrier-tight junctions are more similar to epithelial tight junctions than to endothelial tight junctions in peripheral blood vessels.2. Although blood–brain barrier-tight junctions share many characteristics with epithelial tight junctions, there are also essential differences. However, in contrast to tight junctions in epithelial systems, structural and functional characteristics of tight junctions in endothelial cells are highly sensitive to ambient factors.3. Many ubiquitous molecular constituents of tight junctions have been identified and characterized including claudins, occludin, ZO-1, ZO-2, ZO-3, cingulin, and 7H6. Signaling pathways involved in tight junction regulation comprise, among others, G-proteins, serine, threonine, and tyrosine kinases, extra- and intracellular calcium levels, cAMP levels, proteases, and TNF. Common to most of these pathways is the modulation of cytoskeletal elements which may define blood–brain barrier characteristics. Additionally, cross-talk between components of the tight junction– and the cadherin–catenin system suggests a close functional interdependence of the two cell–cell contact systems.4. Recent studies were able to elucidate crucial aspects of the molecular basis of tight junction regulation. An integration of new results into previous morphological work is the central intention of this review.     

Osmotic Opening of the Blood–Brain Barrier: Principles, Mechanism, and Therapeutic Applications

1. Osmotic opening of the blood–brain barrier by intracarotid infusion of a hypertonic arabinose or mannitol solution is mediated by vasodilatation and shrinkage of cerebrovascular endothelial cells, with widening of the interendothelial tight junctions to an estimated radius of 200 Å. The effect may be facilitated by calcium-mediated contraction of the endothelial cytoskeleton.2. The marked increase in apparent blood–brain barrier permeability to intravascular substances (10-fold for small molecules) following the osmotic procedure is due to both increased diffusion and bulk fluid flow across the tight junctions. The permeability effect is largely reversed within 10 min.3. In experimental animals, the osmotic method has been used to grant wide access to the brain of water-soluble drugs, peptides, antibodies, boron compounds for neutron capture therapy, and viral vectors for gene therapy. The method also has been used together with anticancer drugs to treat patients with metastatic or primary brain tumors, with some success and minimal morbidity.     

Inflammatory Mediators and Modulation of Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability

1. Unlike some interfaces between the blood and the nervous system (e.g., nerve perineurium), the brain endothelium forming the blood–brain barrier can be modulated by a range of inflammatory mediators. The mechanisms underlying this modulation are reviewed, and the implications for therapy of the brain discussed.2. Methods for measuring blood–brain barrier permeability in situ include the use of radiolabeled tracers in parenchymal vessels and measurements of transendothelial resistance and rate of loss of fluorescent dye in single pial microvessels. In vitro studies on culture models provide details of the signal transduction mechanisms involved.3. Routes for penetration of polar solutes across the brain endothelium include the paracellular tight junctional pathway (usually very tight) and vesicular mechanisms. Inflammatory mediators have been reported to influence both pathways, but the clearest evidence is for modulation of tight junctions.4. In addition to the brain endothelium, cell types involved in inflammatory reactions include several closely associated cells including pericytes, astrocytes, smooth muscle, microglia, mast cells, and neurons. In situ it is often difficult to identify the site of action of a vasoactive agent. In vitro models of brain endothelium are experimentally simpler but may also lack important features generated in situ by cell:cell interaction (e.g. induction, signaling).5. Many inflammatory agents increase both endothelial permeability and vessel diameter, together contributing to significant leak across the blood–brain barrier and cerebral edema. This review concentrates on changes in endothelial permeability by focusing on studies in which changes in vessel diameter are minimized.6. Bradykinin (Bk)² increases blood–brain barrier permeability by acting on B₂ receptors. The downstream events reported include elevation of [Ca²⁺]_i, activation of phospholipase A₂, release of arachidonic acid, and production of free radicals, with evidence that IL-1 potentiates the actions of Bk in ischemia.7. Serotonin (5HT) has been reported to increase blood–brain barrier permeability in some but not all studies. Where barrier opening was seen, there was evidence for activation of 5-HT₂ receptors and a calcium-dependent permeability increase.8. Histamine is one of the few central nervous system neurotransmitters found to cause consistent blood–brain barrier opening. The earlier literature was unclear, but studies of pial vessels and cultured endothelium reveal increased permeability mediated by H₂ receptors and elevation of [Ca²⁺]_i and an H₁ receptor-mediated reduction in permeability coupled to an elevation of cAMP.9. Brain endothelial cells express nucleotide receptors for ATP, UTP, and ADP, with activation causing increased blood–brain barrier permeability. The effects are mediated predominantly via a P_2U (P2Y₂) G-protein-coupled receptor causing an elevation of [Ca²⁺]_i; a P2Y₁ receptor acting via inhibition of adenyl cyclase has been reported in some in vitro preparations.10. Arachidonic acid is elevated in some neural pathologies and causes gross opening of the blood–brain barrier to large molecules including proteins. There is evidence that arachidonic acid acts via generation of free radicals in the course of its metabolism by cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase pathways.11. The mechanisms described reveal a range of interrelated pathways by which influences from the brain side or the blood side can modulate blood–brain barrier permeability. Knowledge of the mechanisms is already being exploited for deliberate opening of the blood–brain barrier for drug delivery to the brain, and the pathways capable of reducing permeability hold promise for therapeutic treatment of inflammation and cerebral edema.     

The ultrastructure of the human fetal pineal gland

Summary The innervation of the pineal gland, the cell junctions in this organ and junctions between ependymal cells in the pineal recess were investigated in 27 human fetuses (crown-rump length 30–190 mm).Free nerve boutons containing clear and a few dense core vesicles were present in the pineal parenchyma and in the perivascular spaces. The boutons did not make synaptic contacts with the pinealocytes. No evidence for the presence of noradrenaline in the vesicles of nerve boutons was found.Gap junctions, intermediate-like junctions and desmosomes were frequently seen between the pinealocytes. Ruthenium red was used in three fetuses as an extracellular marker.The continuous endothelial cells surrounding the capillary lumen were connected by tight junctions. This indicates the presence of a blood-brain barrier.Tight junctions were present between the ependymal cells in the pineal recess. These junctions constitute an extracellular barrier between the pineal and the cerebrospinal fluid. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to thank Inger Ægidius and Jb Machen for their technical, Ruth Fatum for her linguistic and Karsten Bundgaard for his photographical assistance     

Frequent blood-brain barrier disruption in the human cerebral cortex

1. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) protects the brain from circulating xenobiotic agents. The pathophysiology, time span, spatial pattern, and pathophysiological consequences of BBB disruptions are not known.2. Here, we report the quantification of BBB disruption by measuring enhancement levels in computerized tomography brain images.3. Pathological diffuse enhancement associated with elevated albumin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was observed in the cerebral cortex of 28 out of 43 patients, but not in controls. Four patients displayed weeks-long focal BBB impairment. In 19 other patients, BBB disruption was significantly associated with elevated blood pressure, body temperature, serum cortisol, and stress-associated CSF readthrough acetylcholinesterase. Multielectrode electroencephalography revealed enhanced slow-wave activities in areas of focal BBB disruption. Thus, quantification of BBB disruption using minimally invasive procedures, demonstrated correlations with molecular, clinical, and physiological stress-associated indices.4. These sequelae accompany a wide range of neurological disorders, suggesting that persistent, detrimental BBB disruption is considerably more frequent than previously assumed.     

Neuritic growth cone and ependymal gap junctions in the feline subfornical organ during early development

Summary Intercellular contacts in the subfornical organ (SFO) of kittens 3, 16, and 29 days old were studied in thin sections and by the freeze-etch method. Gap junctions appeared between growing nerve processes and target cells. The junctions were interspersed between immature synapses lacking mitochondria as well as full preand postsynaptic membrane specializations. Gap junctions were seen on filopodia as well as on more mature processes. The morphology of these junctions was typical of those described earlier but they were of small size (0.2–0.3 m).Gap junctions of peculiar form were also seen between ependymal elements in the SFO at 16 days. These were of large size (0.5–0.8 m) and were often of segmented character. This segmentation consisted of bands 3–4 particles in width with a center-to-center spacing of 90 nm with particle free corridors between corresponding to the width of about two rows of particles. The margin of the group might be circumscribed by a row of particles. Although gap junctions of large size were seen between ependymal cells in thin section, features corresponding to the particle free corridors have not been observed to date.On leave of absence from the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, Section of Functional Neurosurgery, Branch of Clinical Neuroscience, Bethesda, Maryland 20014, USAThis work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research Nos. 3.636.76 and 3.611.0.75, the EMDO Stiftung and the Dr. Eric Slack-Gyr Stiftung     

Interneuronal and glial-neuronal gap junctions in the lamina ganglionaris of the compound eye of the housefly,Musca domestics

Summary The cell-body layer of the lamina ganglionaris of the housefly, Musca domestica, contains the perikarya of five types of monopolar interneuron (L1–L5) along with their enveloping neuroglia (Strausfeld 1971). We confirm previous reports (Trujillo-Cenóz 1965; Boschek 1971) that monopolar cell bodies in the lamina form three structural classes: Class I, Class II, and midget monopolar cells. Class-I cells (L1 and L2) have large (8–15 m) often crescentshaped cell bodies, much perinuclear cytoplasm and deep glial invaginations. Class-II cells (L3 and L4) have smaller perikarya (4–8 m) with little perinuclear cytoplasm and no glial invaginations. The midget monopolar cell (L5) resides at the base of the cell-body layer and has a cubshaped cell body. Though embedded within a reticulum of satellite glia, the L1–L4 monopolar perikarya and their immediately proximal neurites frequently appose each other directly. Typical arthropod (-type) gap junctions are routinely observed at these interfaces. These junctions can span up to 0.8 m with an intercellular space of 2–4 nm. The surrounding nonspecialized interspace is 12–20 nm. Freezefracture replicas of monopolar appositions confirm the presence of -type gap junctions, i.e., circular plaques (0.15–0.7 m diam.) of large (10–15 nm) E-face particles. Gap junctions are present between Class I somata and their proximal neurites, between Class I and Class II somata and proximal neurites, and between Class II somata. Intercartridge coupling may exist between such monopolar somata. The cell body and proximal neurite of L5 were not examined. We also find that Class I and Class II somata are extensively linked to their satellite glia via gap junctions. The gap width and nonjunctional interspace between neuron and glia are the same as those found between neurons. The particular arrangement and morphology of lamina monopolar neurons suggest that coupling or low resistance pathways between functionally distinct neurons and between neuron and glia are probably related to the metabolic requirements of the nuclear layer and may play a role in wide field signal averaging and light adaptation.     

Endothelial Vesicles in the Blood–Brain Barrier: Are They Related to Permeability?

1. Macromolecules cross capillary walls via large vascular pores that are thought to be formed by plasmalemmal vesicles. Early hypotheses suggested that vesicles transferred plasma constituents across the endothelial wall either by a shuttle mechanism or by fusing to form transient patent channels for diffusion. Recent evidence shows that the transcytotic pathway involves both movement of vesicles within the cell and a series of fusions and fissions of the vesicular and cellular membranes.2. The transfer of macromolecules across the capillary wall is highly specific and is mediated by receptors incorporated into specific membrane domains. Therefore, despite their morphological similarity, endothelial vesicles form heterogeneous populations in which the predominant receptor proteins incorporated in their membranes define the functions of individual vesicles.3. Blood–brain barrier capillaries have very low permeabilities to most hydrophilic molecules. Their low permeability to macromolecules has been presumed to be due to an inhibition of the transcytotic mechanism, resulting in a low density of endothelial vesicles.4. A comparison of vesicular densities and protein permeabilities in a number of vascular beds shows only a very weak correlation, therefore vesicle numbers alone cannot be used to predict permeability to macromolecules.5. Blood–brain barrier capillaries are fully capable of transcytosing specific proteins, for example, insulin and transferrin, although the details are still somewhat controversial.6. It has recently been shown that the albumin binding protein gp60 (also known as albondin), which facilitates the transcytosis of native albumin in other vascular beds, is virtually absent in brain capillaries.7. It seems likely that the low blood–brain barrier permeability to macromolecules may be due to a low level of expression of specific receptors, rather than to an inhibition of the transcytosis mechanism.     

Intercellular junctions in nerve-free hydra

Summary Epithelial cells of nerve-free hydra contain septate and gap junctions. In thin sections the gap junctions are characterized by a gap of 3–4 nm. Freeze-fracture demonstrates the presence of septate junctions and two further types of structures: (i) the E-type or inverted gap junctions with particles in an en plaque conformation appearing as a raised plateau on the E-face or as a depression on the P-face; (ii) structures morphologically similar to gap junctions in rat liver, containing particles on the P-face and corresponding pits on the E-face, both having hexagonal packing with a lattice constant of 8 nm. We propose that these structures are also gap junctions.     

Macromolecules can pass through occluding junctions of rat ileal epithelium during cholinergic stimulation

Summary Crypt, but not villus, goblet cells in the ileum accelerate their secretion of mucus within 5 min following cholinergic stimulation. This study was done to determine whether the macromolecular permeability and structure of occluding junctions in the ileum are altered during accelerated secretion. Rats were injected intravenously with horseradish peroxidase followed by carbachol (250 g/kg, subcutaneous) and the intestinal mucosa was fixed 3–12 min later. In control mucosa (saline-injected), peroxidase filled lateral intercellular spaces up to the occluding junctions of both crypt and villus epithelium, but did not enter occluding junctions or pass into the lumen. In 3 of 8 carbachol-stimulated rats, peroxidase was present within occluding junctions in crypt epithelium and in the crypt lumen, although all intermembrane junctional fusion sites appeared intact. Villus epithelial occluding junctions, in contrast, continued to exclude peroxidase. In freeze-fracture replicas of crypt cells prepared after carbachol stimulation, we detected no structural changes in strand networks of occluding junctions that could account for increased paracellular permeability.     

The extracellular space and blood-eye barrier in an insect retina: An ultrastructural study

Summary (1) The distribution of the extracellular space (ECS) in the outer part of the locust compound eye has been mapped with lanthanum and ruthenium red, applied to the retina. (2) In the photoreceptor zone, about 2.4% of the volume is ECS, in agreement with radiotracer and electrical estimates. Of this ECS, about 70% lies in lacunae between ommatidia, but only 1–2% adjacent to the photosensitive rhabdom. The lacunae are filled with material which binds applied tracers, and are thought to be structural spaces. (3) It has been suggested several times that such a small cation pool is insufficient to sustain more than a few large photoresponses, but this is shown to be incorrect. Enough Na⁺ lies within the rhabdomal ECS and within rapid diffusional access to it, to impose no immediate limitation. (4) The palisade vacuoles surrounding the rhabdom are intracellular, and are typical of light as well as dark-adapted eyes. (5) Tracers fail to penetrate more than about 30 m into the axon zone, in agreement with electrical, dye and radiotracer indications of a blood-eye barrier near this point. Septate and gap junctions between glial membranes proliferate at this level, the lacunae disappear, and the axonal clefts narrow, but no tight junctions were seen. Comparison is made with the barrier around the nerve cord. (6) The secondary pigment cells in the retina may function as osmotic/ionic buffers, in conjunction with the blood-eye barrier.     

Gap junctions and impulse propagation in embryonic epithelium of Amphibia

Summary Epithelium of amphibian embryos (Cynops orientalis, Xenopus laevis) was found in preceding experiments to generate and conduct impulses during a limited stage (26–37) of development. In order to elucidate the structural basis of impulse propagation, epithelial cells of four stages were examined by the freeze-etching method: (I) before and (II) during acquisition of conductivity; (III) when propagation was fully established, and (IV) when it was no longer present. Only few gap junctions (GJ) of small size were found in groups I and IV. GJ in epithelia of group III were increased in number and size, and appeared morphologically coupled, i.e., with more loosely arranged connexons. The size of gap-junctional particles did not differ significantly between coupled and uncoupled stages. Zonulae occludentes seemed leaky in stage I, and tight in stages II–IV. Thus, the morphological characteristics of specialized junctions between non excitable cells correlated with the opening and closing of low resistance intercellular current pathways during embryonic development.Gap junctions in particular seem to form an essential link in the non-neural stimulus-response system, which may facilitate the mobility of the embryo during early phases of aquatic life before the reflex pathways have been established. Coupling and uncoupling of gap junctions may also play an important role in the regulation of cell differentiation and morphogenetic movement. The experimental model used in this study provides a useful tool for further investigations of structural correlates of gap junctional permeability under physiological conditions.     

Occluding junctions in a cultured transporting epithelium: Structural and functional heterogeneity

Summary MDCK cells (epithelioid of renal origin) form monolayers which are structurally and functionally similar to transporting epithelia. One of these similarities is the ability to form occluding junctions and act as permeability barriers. This article studies the junctions of MDCK monolayers formed on a permeable and transparent support (a disk of nylon cloth coated with collagen) by combining two different approaches: (i)Scanning of the electric field: the disk is mounted as a flat sheet between two Lucite chambers and pulses of 20–50 A cm^–2 are passed across. The apical surface of the monolayer is then scanned with a microelectrode to detect those points where the current is flowing. This shows that the occluding junctions of this preparation are not homogeneous, but contain long segments of high resistance, intercalated with sites of high conductance. (ii)Freeze fracture electron microscopy: the junctions are composed of regions of eight to ten strands intercalated with others where the strands are reduced to one or two ridges. The sites of high conductance may correspond to those segments where the number of junctional strands is reduced to 1 or 2. It is concluded that the occluding junctions of MDCK monolayers are functionally and morphologically heterogeneous, with tight regions intermixed with leaky ones.     

Permeance of novikoff hepatoma gap junctions: Quantitative video analysis of dye transfer

Summary Fluorescent dyes are commonly used to study permeable (gap) junctions, but only rarely have quantitative values for junctional dye permeability been determined. In the present study, junctional permeance (PA, i.e., the product of the junctional permeability coefficient,P, times the junctional area,A) to Lucifer Yellow CH (LY) has been obtained for pairs of Novikoff hepatoma cells. Dye was microinjected into one cell and the subsequent transfer monitored by a SIT camera and recorded on video tape. The intensities of fluorescence in the injected and recipient cell were measured using a Digisector (Microworks) digitizing board and an Apple II Plus computer to analyze the video records. These changes in intensity, along with an estimate of volume of the spherical cells, were used to calculate the junctional permeance (PA) of cell pairs according to Fick's diffusion equation. Junctional permeances show considerable variation ranging from 0.08×10^–11 to 27.0×10^–11 cm³/sec. Using the meanPA and a previous estimate of the mean number of junctional channels per interface in the Novikoff cultures, a value for diffusion coefficient of LY through gap junctions is calculated to be about 1.4×10^–6 cm²/sec. There is a general proportionality between meanPA and cell volume for hepatoma cell pairs of a certain size range. Such a relationship between cell volume and junctional capacity suggests one source of variation ofPA. Other possible sources, e.g., related to position in the cell cycle, are discussed.     

Ultrastructure of arterioles in the cat brain

Summary A total of 110 arterioles were examined in the brains of cats; different sites were studied including the cortex, putamen, pons and crus cerebri. No internal elastic laminae were seen in the subendothelial space, although occasional fragments of elastic material were present in the larger arterioles. The media was composed of one, two or three layers of smooth muscle cells which interlocked in such a way that the vessel wall thickness was constant. Numerous tight junctions were seen between adjacent smooth muscle cells and between the endothelium and smooth muscle cells. Apart from the usual cell organelles, the smooth muscle cells of arterioles had numerous dense patches on the cell surface. The structure of the adventitia varied according to the diameter of the vessel and the site in the brain; it contained adventitial cells, bundles of collagen fibres and nerve fibres. Innervation of arterioles was more constant in the brain stem than in the cortex. Metarterioles had less specialised, atypical smooth muscle cells, a discontinuous media and numerous, extensive myoendothelial tight junctions; they were not innervated by nerve fibres. The diameter of metarterioles was less than 10 m whereas that of arterioles was 10–45 m. The possible functional aspects of arteriolar innervation are discussed.