Energy transfer in light-harvesting complexes LHCII and CP29 of spinach studied with three pulse echo peak shift and transient grating

Three pulse echo peak shift and transient grating (TG) measurements on the plant light-harvesting complexes LHCII and CP29 are reported. The LHCII complex is by far the most abundant light-harvesting complex in higher plants and fulfills several important physiological functions such as light-harvesting and photoprotection. Our study is focused on the light-harvesting function of LHCII and the very similar CP29 complex and reveals hitherto unresolved excitation energy transfer processes. All measurements were performed at room temperature using detergent isolated complexes from spinach leaves. Both complexes were excited in their Chl b band at 650 nm and in the blue shoulder of the Chl a band at 670 nm. Exponential fits to the TG and three pulse echo peak shift decay curves were used to estimate the timescales of the observed energy transfer processes. At 650 nm, the TG decay can be described with time constants of 130 fs and 2.2 ps for CP29, and 300 fs and 2.8 ps for LHCII. At 670 nm, the TG shows decay components of 230 fs and 6 ps for LHCII, and 300 fs and 5 ps for CP29. These time constants correspond to well-known energy transfer processes, from Chl b to Chl a for the 650 nm TG and from blue (670 nm) Chl a to red (680 nm) Chl a for the 670 nm TG. The peak shift decay times are entirely different. At 650 nm we find times of 150 fs and 0.5-1 ps for LHCII, and 360 fs and 3 ps for CP29, which we can associate mainly with Chl b <--> Chl b energy transfer. At 670 nm we find times of 140 fs and 3 ps for LHCII, and 3 ps for CP29, which we can associate with fast (only in LHCII) and slow transfer between relatively blue Chls a or Chl a states. From the occurrence of both fast Chl b <--> Chl b and fast Chl b --> Chl a transfer in CP29, we conclude that at least two mixed binding sites are present in this complex. A detailed comparison of our observed rates with exciton calculations on both CP29 and LHCII provides us with more insight in the location of these mixed sites. Most importantly, for CP29, we find that a Chl b pair must be present in some, but not all, complexes, on sites A(3) and B(3). For LHCII, the observed rates can best be understood if the same pair, A(3) and B(3), is involved in both fast Chl b <--> Chl b and fast Chl a <--> Chl a transfer. Hence, it is likely that mixed sites also occur in the native LHCII complex. Such flexibility in chlorophyll binding would agree with the general flexibility in aggregation form and xanthophyll binding of the LHCII complex and could be of use for optimizing the role of LHCII under specific circumstances, for example under high-light conditions. Our study is the first to provide spectroscopic evidence for mixed binding sites, as well as the first to show their existence in native complexes.     

Energy transfer pathways in the minor antenna complex CP29 of photosystem II: a femtosecond study of carotenoid to chlorophyll transfer on mutant and WT complexes

The energy transfer processes between carotenoids and Chls have been studied by femtosecond transient absorption in the CP29-WT complex, which contains only two carotenoids per polypeptide located in the L1 and L2 sites, and in the CP29-E166V mutant in which only the L1 site is occupied. The comparison of these two samples allowed us to discriminate between the energy transfer pathways from the two carotenoid binding sites and thus to obtain detailed information on the Chl organization in CP29 and to assign the acceptor chlorophylls. For both samples, the main transfer occurs from the S(2) state of the carotenoid. In the case of the L1 site the energy acceptor is the Chl a 680 nm (A2), whereas the Chl a 675 nm (A4-A5) and the Chl b 652 nm (B6) are the acceptors from the xanthophyll in the L2 site. These transfers occur with lifetimes of 80-130 fs. Two additional transfers are observed with 700-fs and 8- to 20-ps lifetimes. Both these transfers originate from the carotenoid S(1) states. The faster lifetime is due to energy transfer from a vibrationally unrelaxed S(1) state, whereas the 8- to 20-ps component is due to a transfer from the S(1,0) state of violaxanthin and/or neoxanthin located in site L2. A comparison between the carotenoid to Chl energy transfer pathways in CP29 and LHCII is presented and differences in the structural organization in the two complexes are discussed.     

Xanthophyll binding sites of the CP29 (Lhcb4) subunit of higher plant photosystem II investigated by domain swapping and mutation analysis

The binding sites for xanthophylls in the CP29 antenna protein of higher plant Photosystem II have been investigated using recombinant proteins refolded in vitro. Despite the presence of three xanthophyll species CP29 binds two carotenoids per polypeptide. The localization of neoxanthin was studied producing a chimeric protein constructed by swapping the C-helix domain from CP29 to LHCII. The resulting holoprotein did not bind neoxanthin, confirming that the N1 site is not present in CP29. Neoxanthin in CP29 was, instead, bound to the L2 site, which is thus shown to have a wider specificity with respect to the homologous site L2 in LHCII. Lutein was found in the L1 site of CP29. For each site the selectivity for individual xanthophyll species was studied as well as its role in protein stabilization, energy transfer, and photoprotection. Putative xanthophyll binding sequences, identified by primary structure analysis as a stretch of hydrophobic residues including an acidic term, were analyzed by site-directed mutagenesis or, in one case, by deleting the entire sequence. The mutant proteins were unaffected in their xanthophyll composition, thus suggesting that the target motifs had little influence in determining xanthophyll binding, whereas hydrophobic sequences in the membrane-spanning helices are important.     

Determination of the stoichiometry and strength of binding of xanthophylls to the photosystem II light harvesting complexes

Xanthophylls have a crucial role in the structure and function of the light harvesting complexes of photosystem II (LHCII) in plants. The binding of xanthophylls to LHCII has been investigated, particularly with respect to the xanthophyll cycle carotenoids violaxanthin and zeaxanthin. It was found that most of the violaxanthin pool was loosely bound to the major complex and could be removed by mild detergent treatment. Gentle solubilization of photosystem II particles and thylakoids allowed the isolation of complexes, including a newly described oligomeric preparation, enriched in trimers, that retained all of the in vivo violaxanthin pool. It was estimated that each LHCII monomer can bind at least one violaxanthin. The extent to which different pigments can be removed from LHCII indicated that the relative strength of binding was chlorophyll b > neoxanthin > chlorophyll a > lutein > zeaxanthin > violaxanthin. The xanthophyll binding sites are of two types: internal sites binding lutein and peripheral sites binding neoxanthin and violaxanthin. In CP29, a minor LHCII, both a lutein site and the neoxanthin site can be occupied by violaxanthin. Upon activation of the violaxanthin de-epoxidase, the highest de-epoxidation state was found for the main LHCII component and the lowest for CP29, suggesting that only violaxanthin loosely bound to LHCII is available for de-epoxidation.     

The 28 kDa apoprotein of CP 26 in PS II binds copper

Photosystem II (PS II) particles isolated from spinach in the presence of 10 M CuSO₄ contained 1.2 copper/300 Chl that was resistant to EDTA. When CuSO₄ was not added during the isolation, PS II particles contained variable amounts of copper resistant to EDTA (0.1–1.1 copper/300 Chl). No correlation was found between copper content and oxygen evolving capacity of the PS II particles. To identify the copper binding protein, we developed a fractionation procedure which included solubilisation of PS II particles followed by precipitation with polyethylene glycol. A 22-fold purification of copper with respect to protein was achieved for a 28 kDa protein. Partial amino acid sequence of a 13 kDa fragment, obtained after V8 (endo Glu-C) protease treatment, showed identity with CP 26 over a 14 amino acid stretch. EPR measurements on the purified protein suggest oxygen and/or nitrogen as ligands for copper but tend to exclude sulfur. We conclude that the 28 kDa apoprotein of CP 26 from spinach binds one copper per molecule of CP 26. A possible function for this copper protein in the xanthophyll cycle is discussed.Abbreviations CP 26 and CP 29 chlorophyll a/b protein complex 26 and 29 - LHC II light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein complex of Photosystem II - SB14 sulfobetaine 14 A preliminary report of these results was presented at the IX Int. Congress on Photosynthesis, Nagoya, Japan, 1992.     

The major antenna complex of photosystem II has a xanthophyll binding site not involved in light harvesting.

We have characterized a xanthophyll binding site, called V1, in the major light harvesting complex of photosystem II, distinct from the three tightly binding sites previously described as L1, L2, and N1. Xanthophyll binding to the V1 site can be preserved upon solubilization of the chloroplast membranes with the mild detergent dodecyl-alpha-d-maltoside, while an IEF purification step completely removes the ligand. Surprisingly, spectroscopic analysis showed that when bound in this site, xanthophylls are unable to transfer absorbed light energy to chlorophyll a. Pigments bound to sites L1, L2, and N1, in contrast, readily transfer energy to chlorophyll a. This result suggests that this binding site is not directly involved in light harvesting function. When violaxanthin, which in normal conditions is the main carotenoid in this site, is depleted by the de-epoxidation in strong light, the site binds other xanthophyll species, including newly synthesized zeaxanthin, which does not induce detectable changes in the properties of the complex. It is proposed that this xanthophyll binding site represents a reservoir of readily available violaxanthin for the operation of the xanthophyll cycle in excess light conditions.     

The binding of Xanthophylls to the bulk light-harvesting complex of photosystem II of higher plants. A specific requirement for carotenoids with a 3-hydroxy-beta-end group

The pigment composition of the light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) of higher plants is highly conserved. The bulk complex (LHCIIb) binds three xanthophyll molecules in combination with chlorophyll (Chl) a and b. The structural requirements for binding xanthophylls to LHCIIb have been examined using an in vitro reconstitution procedure. Reassembly of the monomeric recombinant LHCIIb was performed using a wide range of native and nonnative xanthophylls, and a specific requirement for the presence of a hydroxy group at C-3 on a single beta-end group was identified. The presence of additional substituents (e.g. at C-4) did not interfere with xanthophyll binding, but they could not, on their own, support reassembly. cis isomers of zeaxanthin, violaxanthin, and lutein were not bound, whereas all-trans-neoxanthin and different chiral forms of lutein and zeaxanthin were incorporated into the complex. The C-3 and C-3' diols lactucaxanthin (a carotenoid native to many plant LHCs) and eschscholtzxanthin (a retro-carotenoid) both behaved very differently from lutein and zeaxanthin in that they would not support complex reassembly when used alone. Lactucaxanthin could, however, be bound when lutein was also present, and it showed a high affinity for xanthophyll binding site N1. In the presence of lutein, lactucaxanthin was readily bound to at least one lutein-binding site, suggesting that the ability to bind to the complex and initiate protein folding may be dependent on different structural features of the carotenoid molecule. The importance of carotenoid end group structure and ring-to-chain conformation around the C-6-C-7 torsion angle of the carotenoid molecule in binding and complex reassembly is discussed.     

Carotenoid binding sites in LHCIIb. Relative affinities towards major xanthophylls of higher plants.

The major light-harvesting complex of photosystem II can be reconstituted in vitro from its bacterially expressed apoprotein with chlorophylls a and b and neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, or zeaxanthin as the only xanthophyll. Reconstitution of these one-carotenoid complexes requires low-stringency conditions during complex formation and isolation. Neoxanthin complexes (containing 30-50% of the all-trans isomer) disintegrate during electrophoresis, exhibit a largely reduced resistance against proteolytic attack; in addition, energy transfer from Chl b to Chl a is easily disrupted at elevated temperature. Complexes reconstituted in the presence of either zeaxanthin or lutein contain nearly two xanthophylls per 12 chlorophylls and are more resistant against trypsin. Lutein-LHCIIb also exhibits an intermediate maintenance of energy transfer at higher temperature. Violaxanthin complexes approach a xanthophyll/12 chlorophyll ratio of 3, similar to the ratio in recombinant LHCIIb containing all xanthophylls. On the other hand, violaxanthin-LHCIIb exhibits a low thermal stability like neoxanthin complexes, but an intermediate accessibility towards trypsin, similar to lutein-LHCIIb and zeaxanthin-LHCIIb. Binary competition experiments were performed with two xanthophylls at varying ratios in the reconstitution. Analysis of the xanthophyll contents in the reconstitution products yielded information about relative carotenoid affinities of three assumed binding sites. In lutein/neoxanthin competition experiments, two binding sites showed a strong preference (> 200-fold) for lutein, whereas the third binding site had a higher affinity (25-fold) to neoxanthin. Competition between lutein and violaxanthin gave a similar result, although the specificities were lower: two binding sites have a 36-fold preference for lutein and one has a fivefold preference for violaxanthin. The lowest selectivity was between lutein and zeaxanthin: two binding sites had a fivefold higher affinity for lutein and one has a threefold higher affinity to zeaxanthin.     

Pigment compositions,spectral properties,and energy transfer efficiencies between the xanthophylls and chlorophylls in the major and minor pigment-protein complexes of photosystem II

Absorption, fluorescence, and fluorescence excitation spectra have been measured from CP26, CP29, and monomeric and trimeric LHCIIb light-harvesting complexes isolated from Photosystem II subchloroplast particles from spinach. The complexes were purified using a combination of isoelectric focusing and sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation. The chlorophyll (Chl) and xanthophyll pigment compositions were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Using the pigment compositions from the HPLC analysis as a starting point, the absorption spectral profiles of the complexes have been reconstructed from the individual absorption spectra obtained for each of the pigments. Also, the fluorescence excitation spectra of the complexes have been deconvoluted. The data reveal the energy transfer efficiencies between Chl b and Chl a and between specific xanthophylls and Chl a in the complexes. The spectral analyses reveal the underlying features of the highly congested spectral profiles associated with the complexes and are expected to be beneficial to researchers employing spectroscopic methods to investigate the mechanisms of energy transfer between the pigments bound in these complexes.     

Chlorophyll b to chlorophyll a energy transfer kinetics in the CP29 antenna complex: a comparative femtosecond absorption study between native and reconstituted proteins

The energy transfer processes between Chls b and Chls a have been studied in the minor antenna complex CP29 by femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Two samples were analyzed: the native CP29, purified from higher plants, and the recombinant one, reconstituted in vitro with the full pigment complement. The measurements indicate that the transfer kinetics in the two samples are virtually identical, confirming that the reconstituted CP29 has the same spectroscopic properties as the native one. In particular, three lifetimes (150 fs, 1.2 ps, and 5-6 ps) were identified for Chl b-652 nm to Chl a energy transfer and at least one for Chl b-640 nm (600-800 fs). Considering that the complexes bind two Chls b per polypeptide, the observation of more than two lifetimes for the Chl b to Chl a energy transfer, in both samples, clearly indicates the presence of the so-called mixed Chl binding sites--sites which are not selective for Chl a or Chl b, but can accommodate either species. The kinetic components and spectra are assigned to specific Chl binding sites in the complex, which provides further information on the structural organization.     

Carotenoid-binding sites of the major light-harvesting complex II of higher plants.

Recombinant light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins with modified carotenoid composition have been obtained by in vitro reconstitution of the Lhcb1 protein overexpressed in bacteria. The monomeric protein possesses three xanthophyll-binding sites. The L1 and L2 sites, localized by electron crystallography in the helix A/helix B cross, have the highest affinity for lutein, but also bind violaxanthin and zeaxanthin with lower affinity. The latter xanthophyll causes disruption of excitation energy transfer. The occupancy of at least one of these sites, probably L1, is essential for protein folding. Neoxanthin is bound to a distinct site (N1) that is highly selective for this species and whose occupancy is not essential for protein folding. Whereas xanthophylls in the L1 and L2 sites interact mainly with chlorophyll a, neoxanthin shows strong interaction with chlorophyll b, inducing the hyperchromic effect of the 652 nm absorption band. This observation explains the recent results of energy transfer from carotenoids to chlorophyll b obtained by femtosecond absorption spectroscopy. Whereas xanthophylls in the L1 and L2 sites are active in photoprotection through chlorophyll-triplet quenching, neoxanthin seems to act mainly in (1)O(2)(*) scavenging.     

Chlorophyll binding to monomeric light-harvesting complex. A mutation analysis of chromophore-binding residues

The chromophore binding properties of the higher plant light-harvesting complex II have been studied by site-directed mutagenesis of pigment-binding residues. Mutant apoproteins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and then refolded in vitro with purified chromophores to yield holoproteins selectively affected in chlorophyll-binding sites. Biochemical and spectroscopic characterization showed a specific loss of pigments and absorption spectral forms for each mutant, thus allowing identification of the chromophores bound to most of the binding sites. On these bases a map for the occupancy of individual sites by chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b is proposed. In some cases a single mutation led to the loss of more than one chromophore indicating that four chlorophylls and one xanthophyll could be bound by pigment-pigment interactions. Differential absorption spectroscopy allowed identification of the Q(y) transition energy level for each chlorophyll within the complex. It is shown that not only site selectivity is largely conserved between light-harvesting complex II and CP29 but also the distribution of absorption forms among different protein domains, suggesting conservation of energy transfer pathways within the protein and outward to neighbor subunits of the photosystem.     

A study of molecular interactions in light-harvesting complexes LHCIIb, CP29, CP26 and CP24 by Stark effect spectroscopy

Electric field-induced absorption changes (electrochromism or Stark effect) of the light-harvesting PSII pigment-protein complexes LHCIIb, CP29, CP26 and CP24 were investigated. The results indicate the lack of strong intermolecular interactions in the chlorophyll a (Chl a) pools of all complexes. Characteristic features occur in the electronic spectrum of Chl b, which reflect the increased values of dipole moment and polarizability differences between the ground and excited states of interacting pigment systems. The strong Stark signal recorded for LHCIIb at 650-655 nm is much weaker in CP29, where it is replaced by a unique Stark band at 639 nm. Electrochromism of Chl b in CP26 and CP24 is significantly weaker but increased electrochromic parameters were also noticed for the Chl b transition at 650 nm. The spectra in the blue region are dominated by xanthophylls. The differences in Stark spectra of Chl b are linked to differences in pigment content and organization in individual complexes and point to the possibility of electron exchange interactions between energetically similar and closely spaced Chl b molecules.     

Spectral substructure and excitonic interactions in the minor photosystem II antenna complex CP29 as revealed by nonlinear polarization spectroscopy in the frequency domain

CP29 (the lhcb4 gene product), a minor photosystem II antenna complex, binds six chlorophyll (Chl) a, two Chl b, and two to three xanthophyll molecules. The Chl a/b Q(y) absorption band substructure of CP29 (purified from spinach) was investigated by nonlinear polarization spectroscopy in the frequency domain (NLPF) at room temperature. A set of NLPF spectra was obtained at 11 probe wavelengths. Seven probe wavelengths were located in the Q(y) spectral region (between 630 and 690 nm) and four in the Soret band (between 450 and 485 nm). Evaluation of the experimental data within the framework of global analysis leads to the following conclusions: (i) The dominant Chl a absorption (with a maximum at 674 nm) splits into (at least) three subbands (centered at 660, 670, and 681.5 nm). (ii) In the Chl b region two subbands can be identified with maxima located at 640 and 646 nm. (iii) The lowest energy Q(y) transition (peaking at 681.5 nm) is assigned to a Chl a which only weakly interacts with other Chl aor b molecules by incoherent F?rster-type excitation energy transfer. (iv) Pronounced excitonic interaction exists between certain Chl a and Chl b molecules, which most likely form a Chl a/b heterodimer. The subbands centered at 640 and 670 nm constitute a strongly coupled Chl a/b pair. The findings of the study indicate that the currently favored view of spectral heterogeneity in CP29 being due essentially to pigment-protein interactions has to be revised.     

Pigment and protein composition of reconstituted light-harvesting complexes and effects of some protein modifications

The structure and heterogeneity of LHC II were studied by in vitro reconstitution of apoproteins with pigments (Plumley and Schmidt 1987, Proc Natl Acad Sci 84: 146–150). Reconstituted CP 2 complexes purified by LDS-PAGE were subsequently characterized and shown to have spectroscopic properties and pigment-protein compositions and stoichiometries similar to those of authentic complexes. Heterologous reconstitutions utilizing pigments and light-harvesting proteins from spinach, pea and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii reveal no evidence of specialized binding sites for the unique C. reinhardtii xanthophyll loroxanthin: lutein and loroxanthin are interchangeable for in vitro reconstitution. Proteins modified by the presence of a transit peptide, phosphorylation, or proteolytic removal of the NH₂-terminus could be reconstituted. Evidence suggests that post-translational modification are not responsible for the presence of six electrophoretic variants of C. reinhardtii CP 2. Reconstitution is blocked by iodoacetamide pre-treatment of the apoproteins suggesting a role for cysteine in pigment ligation and/or proper folding of the pigment-protein complex. Finally, no effect of divalent cations on pigment reassembly could be detected.Abbreviations cab chlorophyll a/b-binding protein genes - Chl chlorophyll - CP2 light-harvesting chlorophyll A+b-protein complex fractionated by mildly denaturing LDS-PAGE from Photosystem II in thylakoids - CP 43 and CP 47 chlorophyll a-antenna complexes fractionated from Photosystem II in thylakoids by mildly denaturing LDS-PAGE at 4°C - IgG gamma immunoglobulin - LDS lithium dodecyl sulfate - LDS-PAGE lithium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 4°C - LHC I and LHC II thylakoid light-harvesting chlorophyll a+b-protein holocomplexes associated with Photosystems I and II, respectively - PS II Photosystem II - TX100 Triton X-100 - TX100-derived LHC light-harvesting complexes enriched in LHC II following fractionation of thylakoids by TX100     

Kinetic analysis of nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. 2. Isolated light-harvesting complexes

The chlorophyll fluorescence yield of purified photosystem II light-harvesting complexes can be lowered by manipulation of experimental conditions. In several important respects, this quenching resembles the nonphotochemical quenching observed in isolated chloroplasts and leaves, therefore providing a model system for investigating the underlying mechanism. A methodology based on the principles of enzyme kinetic analysis has already been applied to isolated chloroplasts, and this same experimental approach was used here with purified LHCIIb, CP26, and CP29. It was found that the kinetics of the decrease in fluorescence yield robustly fitted a second-order kinetic model with respect to time after induction of quenching. The second-order rate constant was dependent upon the complex that was analyzed, the detergent concentration, the solution pH, and the presence of exogenous xanthophyll cycle carotenoids. In contrast, the formation of an absorbance change at 683 nm that accompanies quenching displayed first-order kinetics. The reversal of quenching also displayed second-order kinetics. These data show that quenching results from a binary reaction, possibly arising between two chlorophyll molecules. On the basis of these data, a model for the regulation of nonphotochemical quenching based upon the allosteric control of the conformation of light-harvesting complexes by protonation and xanthophyll binding is presented.     

A study of molecular interactions in light-harvesting complexes LHCIIb, CP29, CP26 and CP24 by Stark effect spectroscopy

Electric field-induced absorption changes (electrochromism or Stark effect) of the light-harvesting PSII pigment-protein complexes LHCIIb, CP29, CP26 and CP24 were investigated. The results indicate the lack of strong intermolecular interactions in the chlorophyll a (Chl a) pools of all complexes. Characteristic features occur in the electronic spectrum of Chl b, which reflect the increased values of dipole moment and polarizability differences between the ground and excited states of interacting pigment systems. The strong Stark signal recorded for LHCIIb at 650-655 nm is much weaker in CP29, where it is replaced by a unique Stark band at 639 nm. Electrochromism of Chl b in CP26 and CP24 is significantly weaker but increased electrochromic parameters were also noticed for the Chl b transition at 650 nm. The spectra in the blue region are dominated by xanthophylls. The differences in Stark spectra of Chl b are linked to differences in pigment content and organization in individual complexes and point to the possibility of electron exchange interactions between energetically similar and closely spaced Chl b molecules.     

Energy transfer for low temperature fluorescence in PS II mutant thylakoids

The Chl-protein complexes of three maize (Zea mays L.) mutants and one barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mutant were analyzed using low temperature Chl fluorescence emissions spectroscopy and LDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The maize mutants hcf-3, hcf-19, and hcf-114 all exhibited a high Chl fluorescence (hcf) phenotype indicating a disruption of the energy transfer within the photosynthetic apparatus. The mutations in each of these maize mutants affects Photosystem II. The barley mutant analyzed was the well characterized Chl b-less mutant chlorina-f2, which did not exhibit the hcf phenotype. Chlorina-f2 was used because no complete Chl b-less mutant of maize is available. Analysis of hcf-3, hcf-19, and hcf-114 revealed that in the absence of CP43, LHC II can still transfer excitation energy to CP47. These results suggest that in mutant membranes LHC II can interact with CP47 as well as CP43. This functional interaction of LHC II with CP47 may only occur in the absence of CP43, however, it is possible that LHC II is positioned in the thylakoid membranes in a manner which allows association with both CP43 and CP47.Abbreviations hcf high chlorophyll fluorescence - LDS lithium dodecyl sulfate - LHC II light-harvesting complex of Photosystem II - LHC I light-harvesting complex of Photosystem I - CPIa chlorophyll-protein complex consisting of LHC I and the PS I core complex - CPI chlorophyll-protein complex consisting of the PS I core complex - CP47 47 kDa chlorophyll-protein of the Photosystem II core - CP43 43 kDa chlorophyll-protein of the Photosystem II core - CP29 29 kDa chlorophyll-protein of Photosystem II - CP26 26 kDa chlorophyll-protein of Photosystem II - CP24 24 kDa chlorophyll-protein of Photosystem II - fp free pigments     

Polypeptides belonging to each of the three major chlorophyll a + b protein complexes are present in a chlorophyll-b-less barley mutant

Polypeptides of the three major chlorophyll a + b protein complexes were detected in a chlorophyll-b-less barley mutant (chlorina f2) using immunological techniques. Antibodies to CP Ia, a photosystem I complex containing both the reaction center (CP I) and the chlorophyll a + b antenna (LHCI), detected substantial amounts of LHCI polypeptides in mutant thylakoids. Some polypeptides of the two photosystem-II-associated chlorophyll a + b complexes, CP 29 and LHCII, were also detected using antibodies raised against these complexes. The CP 29 apoprotein and the minor 25-kDa polypeptide of LHCII were present in amounts that could be seen by Coomassie blue staining. In contrast, the two major polypeptides of LHCII were greatly diminished in amount, and one of them may be completely absent. These data suggest that the absence of chlorophyll b may have differing effects on the synthesis, processing or turnover of the various chlorophyll a + b binding polypeptides. They also show that these polypeptides can be inserted into thylakoids in the absence of Chl b, and that significant amounts of some of them are accumulated in the mutant thylakoids.     

Changes of absorption spectra during heat-induced denaturation of Photosystem II core antenna complexes CP43 and CP47: revealing the binding states of chlorophyll molecules in these two complexes

The Photosystem II (PSII) core antenna complexes, CP43 and CP47, were prepared from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). The absorption spectra in the red region at room temperature were recorded for the PSII core antenna samples after increased temperature treatment (up to 80 degrees C). Derivative and difference spectra revealed the existence of two groups of chlorophyll a (Chl a) molecules in both CP43 and CP47. The one with the absorption peak in the shorter wavelength region was designated as CP43-669 and CP47-669, while the other with the absorption peak in the longer wavelength region was designated as CP43-682 and CP47-680. The results of the thermal treatment experiment demonstrated that CP43-669 and CP47-669 may exist as monomers of Chl a and that their binding sites on the polypeptides are insensitive to thermal treatment, whereas CP43-682 and CP47-680 may exist as dimers or multimers of Chl a and their binding regions in the polypeptide chains are more sensitive to heat treatment. The excitation energy transfer mechanism between these two different groups of Chl a molecules is also analyzed.