Phosphorylation of the VirG protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by the autophosphorylated VirA protein: essential role in biological activity of VirG.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence genes are induced by plant signals through the VirA-VirG two-component regulatory system. The VirA protein is a membrane-spanning sensor molecule that possesses an autophosphorylating activity, and the VirG protein is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. In this report, we demonstrate that the VirG protein is phosphorylated by the VirA protein and that the phosphate is directly transferred from the phosphorylated VirA molecule (phosphohistidine) to the VirG protein. The chemical stability of the phospho-VirG bond suggested that the VirG protein was phosphorylated at the aspartate and/or glutamate residue. The phosphorylated VirG protein was reduced with tritiated sodium borohydride and subjected to proteolytic digestion with the Achromobacter protease I enzyme. The resulting peptide fragments were separated by C8 reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography, and the tritium-labeled peptide was sequenced. Amino acid sequence data showed that the aspartate residue at position 52 was the only site phosphorylated. Changing this aspartate into asparagine resulted in a nonphosphorylatable and biologically nonfunctional gene product. As a control, a randomly chosen aspartate was changed into an asparagine (position 72), and no effect on its phosphorylation or biological activity was observed. Unlike its homologs, including CheA-CheY, EnvZ-OmpR, and NtrB-NtrC, the phospho-VirG molecule was very stable in vitro. The possible implications of these observations and the function of VirG phosphorylation in vir gene activation are discussed.     

Intersubunit complementation of sugar signal transduction in VirA heterodimers and posttranslational regulation of VirA activity in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

The VirA/VirG two-component regulatory system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens regulates expression of the virulence (vir) genes that control the infection process leading to crown gall tumor disease on susceptible plants. VirA, a membrane-bound homodimer, initiates vir gene induction by communicating the presence of molecular signals found at the site of a plant wound through phosphorylation of VirG. Inducing signals include phenols, monosaccharides, and acidic pH. While sugars are not essential for gene induction, their presence greatly increases vir gene expression when levels of the essential phenolic signal are low. Reception of the sugar signal depends on a direct interaction between ChvE, a sugar-binding protein, and VirA. Here we show that the sugar signal received in the periplasmic region of one subunit within a VirA heterodimer can enhance the kinase function of the second subunit. However, sugar enhancement of vir gene expression was vector dependent. virA alleles expressed from pSa-derived vectors inhibited signal transduction by endogenous VirA. Inhibition was conditional, depending on the induction medium and the virA allele tested. Moreover, constitutive expression of virG overcame the inhibitory effect of some but not all virA alleles, suggesting that there may be more than one inhibitory mechanism.     

Molecular characterization of the virulence gene virA of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens octopine Ti plasmid

The virulence loci play an essential role in tumor formation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Induction of vir gene expression by plant signal molecules is solely dependent on the virulence loci virA and virG. This study focused on the virA locus of the octopine type Ti plasmid pTi15955. The nucleic acid sequence of a 5.7-kilobase fragment encompassing virA was determined. Genetic analysis of this region revealed that virA contains one open reading frame coding for a protein of 91 639 daltons. Immunodetection with antibodies raised against a 35-kDa VirA fusion protein produced in E. coli identified the VirA product in wild-type Agrobacterium cells. Moreover, it is shown that the VirA protein is located in the cytoplasmic membrane fraction of Agrobacterium. These data confirm the proposed regulatory function of VirA whereby VirA acts as a membrane sensor protein to identify plant signal molecules in the environment. The proposed sensory function of VirA strikingly resembles the function of the chemotaxis receptor proteins of E. coli.     

Molecular characterization of the virulence gene virA of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens octopine Ti plasmid

The virulence loci play an essential role in tumor formation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Induction of vir gene expression by plant signal molecules is solely dependent on the virulence loci virA and virG. This study focused on the virA locus of the octopine type Ti plasmid pTi15955. The nucleic acid sequence of a 5.7-kilobase fragment encompassing virA was determined. Genetic analysis of this region revealed that virA contains one open reading frame coding for a protein of 91 639 daltons. Immunodetection with antibodies raised against a 35-kDa VirA fusion protein produced in E. coli identified by the VirA product in wild-type Agrobacterium cells. Moreover, it is shown that the VirA protein is located in the cytoplasmic membrane fraction of Agrobacterium. These data confirm the proposed regulatory function of VirA whereby VirA acts as a membrane sensor protein to identify plant signal molecules in the environment. The proposed sensory function of VirA strikingly resembles the function of the chemotaxis receptor proteins of E. coli.     

The sensing of plant signal molecules by Agrobacterium: genetic evidence for direct recognition of phenolic inducers by the VirA protein

The virulence (vir) genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens are induced by low-molecular-weight phenolic compounds and monosaccharides through a two-component regulatory system consisting of the VirA and VirG proteins. Although it is clear that the monosaccharides require binding to a periplasmic binding protein before they can interact with the sensor VirA protein, it is not certain whether the phenolic compounds also interact with a binding protein or directly interact with the sensor protein. To shed light on this question, we tested the vir-inducing abilities of several different phenolic compounds using two wild-type strains of A. tumefaciens, KU12 and A6. We found that several compounds such as 4-hydroxyacetophone and p-coumaric acid induced the vir of KU12, but not A6. On the other hand, acetosyringone and several other phenolic compounds induced the vir of A6, but not KU12. By transferring different Ti plasmids into isogenic chromosomal backgrounds, we showed that the phenolic sensing determinant is associated with the Ti plasmid. Subcloning of the Ti plasmid indicated that the virA locus determines which phenolic compounds can function as vir inducers. These results suggest that VirA directly senses the phenolic compounds for vir activation.     

Constitutive activation of two-component response regulators: characterization of VirG activation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Response regulators are the ultimate modulators in two-component signal transduction pathways. The N-terminal receiver domains generally accept phosphates from cognate histidine kinases to control output. VirG for example, the response regulator of the VirA/VirG two-component system in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, mediates the expression of virulence genes in response to plant host signals. Response regulators have a highly conserved structure and share a similar conformational activation upon phosphorylation, yet the sequence and structural features that determine or perturb the cooperative activation events are ill defined. Here we use VirG and the unique features of the Agrobacterium system to extend our understanding of the response regulator activation. Two previously isolated constitutive VirG mutants, VirGN54D and VirGI77V/D52E, provide the foundation for our studies. In vivo phosphorylation patterns establish that VirGN54D is able to accumulate phosphates from small-molecule phosphate donors, such as acetyl phosphate, while the VirGI77V/D52E allele carries conformational changes mimicking the active conformation. Further structural alterations on these two alleles begin to reveal the changes necessary for response regulator activation.     

Genetic analysis of the signal-sensing region of the histidine protein kinase VirA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens

The membrane-bound sensor protein kinase VirA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens detects plant phenolic substances, which induce expression of vir genes that are essential for the formation of the crown gall tumor. VirA also responds to specific monosaccharides, which enhance vir expression. These sugars are sensed by the periplasmic domain of VirA that includes the region homologous to the chemoreceptor Trg, and the phenolics are thought to be detected by a part of the cytoplasmic linker domain, while the second transmembrane domain (TM2) is reported to be nonessential. To define regions of VirA that are essential for signal sensing, we introduced base-substitution and deletion mutations into coding regions that are conserved among the respective domains of VirA proteins from various Agrobacterium strains, and examined the effects of these mutations on vir induction and tumorigenicity. The results show that the Trg-homologous region in the periplasmic domain is not essential for the enhancement of vir gene expression by sugars. Most mutations in the TM2 domain also failed to influence enhancement by sugars and reduced the level of vir induction, but a mutation in the TM2 region adjacent to the cytoplasmic linker abolished induction of the vir genes. In the linker domain, sites essential for vir induction by phenolics were scattered over the entire region. We propose that a topological feature formed by the linker domain and at least part of the TM2 may be crucial for activation of a membrane-anchored VirA protein. Complementation analysis with two different VirA mutants suggested that intermolecular phosphorylation between VirA molecules occurs in vivo, and that two intact periplasmic regions in a VirA dimer are required for the enhancement of vir induction by sugars. Received: 14 December 1999 / Accepted: 10 April 2000     

Compilation of All Genes Encoding Bacterial Two-component Signal Transducers in the Genome of the Cyanobacterium, Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803

Bacteria have devised sophisticated signaling systems for elicitinga variety of adaptive responses to their environment, whichare generally referred to as the "two-component regulatory system."The widespread occurrence of the two-component systems in bothprokaryotes and eukaryotes implies that it is a powerful devicefor a wide variety of adaptive responses of cells to their environment.The two-component signal transducers contain one or more ofthree conserved and characteristic phosphotransfer signalingdomains, named the "transmitter, receiver, and alternative transmitter."The recently determined entire genomic sequence of Synechocystissp. strain PCC 6803 allowed us to compile systematically a completelist of genes encoding such two-component signal transductionproteins. The results of such an effort, made in this study,revealed that at least 80 ORFs were identified as members ofthe two-component signal transducers in this single speciesof cyanobacteria.     

Genetic analysis of the signal-sensing region of the histidine protein kinase VirA of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Agrobacterium tumefaciens</Emphasis>

The membrane-bound sensor protein kinase VirA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens detects plant phenolic substances, which induce expression of vir genes that are essential for the formation of the crown gall tumor. VirA also responds to specific monosaccharides, which enhance vir expression. These sugars are sensed by the periplasmic domain of VirA that includes the region homologous to the chemoreceptor Trg, and the phenolics are thought to be detected by a part of the cytoplasmic linker domain, while the second transmembrane domain (TM2) is reported to be nonessential. To define regions of VirA that are essential for signal sensing, we introduced base-substitution and deletion mutations into coding regions that are conserved among the respective domains of VirA proteins from various Agrobacterium strains, and examined the effects of these mutations on vir induction and tumorigenicity. The results show that the Trg-homologous region in the periplasmic domain is not essential for the enhancement of vir gene expression by sugars. Most mutations in the TM2 domain also failed to influence enhancement by sugars and reduced the level of vir induction, but a mutation in the TM2 region adjacent to the cytoplasmic linker abolished induction of the vir genes. In the linker domain, sites essential for vir induction by phenolics were scattered over the entire region. We propose that a topological feature formed by the linker domain and at least part of the TM2 may be crucial for activation of a membrane-anchored VirA protein. Complementation analysis with two different VirA mutants suggested that intermolecular phosphorylation between VirA molecules occurs in vivo, and that two intact periplasmic regions in a VirA dimer are required for the enhancement of vir induction by sugars.     

Mutational analysis of the input domain of the VirA protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

The transmembrane sensor protein VirA activates VirG in response to high levels of acetosyringone (AS). In order to respond to low levels of AS, VirA requires the periplasmic sugar-binding protein ChvE and monosaccharides released from plant wound sites. To better understand how VirA senses these inducers, the C58 virA gene was randomly mutagenized, and 14 mutants defective in vir gene induction and containing mutations which mapped to the input domain of VirA were isolated. Six mutants had single missense mutatiions in three widely separated areas of the periplasmic domain. Eight mutants had mutations in or near an amphipathic helix, TM1, or TM2. Four of the mutations in the periplasmic domain, when introduced into the corresponding A6 virA sequence, caused a specific defect in the vir gene response to glucose. This suggests that most of the periplasmic domain is required for the interaction with, or response to, ChvE. Three of the mutations from outside the periplasmic domain, one from each transmembrane domain and one from the amphiphathic helix, were made in A6 virA. These mutants were defective in the vir gene response to AS. These mutations did not affect the stability or topology of VirA or prevent dimerization; therefore, they may interfere with detection of AS or transmission of the signals to the kinase domain. Characterization of C58 chvE mutants revealed that, unlike A6 VirA, C58 VirA requires ChvE for activation of the vir genes.     

Proteomic analysis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens response to the Vir gene inducer acetosyringone

Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall disease in a wide range of plants by transforming plants through the transfer and integration of its transferred DNA (T-DNA) into the host genome. In the present study, we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to examine the protein expression profiles of A. tumefaciens in response to the phenolic compound acetosyringone (AS), a known plant-released virulence (vir) gene inducer. Using mass spectrometry, we identified 11 proteins consisting of 9 known AS-induced Vir proteins and 2 newly discovered AS-induced proteins, an unknown protein Y4mC (Atu6162) and a small heat shock protein HspL (Atu3887). Further expression analysis revealed that the AS-induced expression of Y4mC and HspL is regulated by the VirA/VirG two-component system. This report presents the first proteomics study successfully identifying both known and new AS-induced proteins that are implicated in Agrobacterium virulence.     

Molecular Basis of ChvE Function in Sugar Binding,Sugar Utilization,and Virulence in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

ChvE is a chromosomally encoded protein in Agrobacterium tumefaciens that mediates a sugar-induced increase in virulence (vir) gene expression through the activities of the VirA/VirG two-component system and has also been suggested to be involved in sugar utilization. The ChvE protein has homology to several bacterial periplasmic sugar-binding proteins, such as the ribose-binding protein and the galactose/glucose-binding protein of Escherichia coli. In this study, we provide direct evidence that ChvE specifically binds the vir gene-inducing sugar d-glucose with high affinity. Furthermore, ChvE mutations resulting in altered vir gene expression phenotypes have been isolated and characterized. Three distinct categories of mutants have been identified. Strains expressing the first class are defective in both virulence and d-glucose utilization as a result of mutations to residues lining the sugar-binding cleft. Strains expressing a second class of mutants are not adversely affected in sugar binding but are defective in virulence, presumably due to impaired interactions with the sensor kinase VirA. A subset of this second class of mutants includes variants of ChvE that also result in defective sugar utilization. We propose that these mutations affect not only interactions with VirA but also interactions with a sugar transport system. Examination of a homology model of ChvE shows that the mutated residues associated with the latter two phenotypes lie in two overlapping solvent-exposed sites adjacent to the sugar-binding cleft where conformational changes associated with the binding of sugar might have a maximal effect on ChvE''s interactions with its distinct protein partners.Virulent strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens contain the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid that carries virulence (vir) operons. Products of vir operons are involved in infecting wound sites of dicotyledonous plants and initiating tumor formation. The expression of vir genes in A. tumefaciens is activated by plant-released signals, namely, phenolic derivatives, acidic pH, and monosaccharides (for a review, see reference 6), via the combined activities of the periplasmic protein ChvE and the VirA/VirG two-component regulatory system. Upon perception of these plant signals, autophosphorylated VirA, a transmembrane histidine kinase, transfers a phosphoryl group to VirG, a response regulator, and then the phosphorylated VirG activates the expression of vir genes by binding vir boxes in their promoters (8, 19, 24, 31, 52).Perception and transduction of the sugar signals is crucial to the virulence of A. tumefaciens: strains lacking ChvE, a chromosomally encoded putative sugar-binding protein, are significantly less virulent than wild-type strains (17, 18). Previous studies have shown that, in fact, sugar signaling is neither sufficient for nor absolutely required for vir gene expression. Rather, sugars vastly increase both the sensitivity of VirA to phenol derivatives, such as acetosyringone (AS), and the maximal levels of vir gene expression observed at saturating levels of such compounds (for a review, see reference 26). The periplasmic domain of VirA is required for transduction of the sugar and pH signals (7, 8, 16, 41), whereas the so-called “linker” domain, located in the cytoplasm between the second transmembrane domain and the kinase domain, is required for perception and transduction of the phenolic signals (8, 46, 47).A working model for the ChvE/sugar/VirA signaling pathway suggests that monosaccharide-bound ChvE interacts with the periplasmic domain of VirA to relieve periplasmic repression, resulting in maximal sensitivity of VirA to phenolic signals (7, 11, 32, 41). However, limited evidence has been presented to reveal how ChvE recognizes monosaccharides and how it interacts with the periplasmic domain of VirA. Shimoda et al. (41) identified a mutant chvE allele [chvE(T211M)] that is able to suppress a sugar-insensitive virA allele [virA(E210V)], thereby restoring the sugar-sensing ability. The suppressing effect of chvE(T211M) was then proposed to be the result of the specific restoration of the capacity of VirA^E210V to bind ChvE^T211M. However, ChvE^T211M also activated wild-type VirA in the absence of sugars (32), suggesting that this mutant may not be a site-specific suppressor of VirA^E210V. Based on a homology model of ChvE, a recent study (16) does predict, though, that the residue T211 is located on the surface of the ChvE protein, consistent with the model that T211 is in a position to interact with the periplasmic domain of VirA.Based on sequence similarity, ChvE is a member of the periplasmic sugar-binding protein (PSBP) family. The structures of some PSBPs, including two ChvE homologues in Escherichia coli, ribose-binding protein (RBP) and glucose/galactose-binding protein (GBP), have been solved. The family of PSBPs shares very similar structural features, and each of them contains two similar but distinct globular domains connected by a flexible hinge (38). A sugar-binding site is located at the cleft between the two domains. PSBPs play an important role in active sugar transport, and some of them also serve as an initial receptor for sugar chemotaxis (45). A wealth of evidence has demonstrated that some specialized regions located on the surfaces of PSBPs are important for transport and chemotactic functions. In the case of RBP, four distinct regions spanning the N-terminal and C-terminal domains are involved in interaction with its permease (a transport partner), its chemotransducer (a chemotactic partner), or both (5, 15). In GBP, one residue was identified as being specifically involved in chemotaxis but not transport (36, 49). For maltose-binding protein (MBP), which is also a member of the PSBP family, two well-defined regions located on each domain of the protein are involved in interaction with its chemotransducer (54). These regions partially overlap with the regions involved in interaction with its permease (25, 54). Structural analysis indicates that both domains of MBP have direct interactions with its transport partners (35).ChvE also appears to be a highly versatile protein: not only does it play an important role in virulence, but as in the case of the PSPBs described above, it has been indicated to be a primary receptor for transport of and chemotaxis toward some sugars (7). This raises important biological/biochemical questions. How can ChvE interact with three presumably different periplasmic components of systems that are respectively involved in virulence, sugar utilization, and chemotaxis? How are the interactions of ChvE with these periplasmic components structurally segregated: do the interactions occur on the same or different regions of ChvE? To address these issues, we employed genetic and biophysical approaches to identify the residues of ChvE involved in sugar utilization versus the residues involved in virulence. The residues of both groups were mapped onto a homology model of ChvE based on a high-resolution crystal structure of E. coli GBP (PDB ID, 2ipn). Our results identify an extended surface spanning both the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of ChvE that is essential for interacting with VirA and that partially overlaps the surface responsible for the interaction of ChvE with a putative ABC sugar transport protein.