Restoration of miR-101 suppresses lung tumorigenesis through inhibition of DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation

The deregulation of miR-101 and DNMT3a has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple tumor types, but whether and how miR-101 silencing and DNMT3a overexpression contribute to lung tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here we show that miR-101 downregulation associates with DNMT3a overexpression in lung cancer cell lines and patient tissues. Ectopic miR-101 expression remarkably abrogated the DNMT3a 3′-UTR luciferase activity corresponding to the miR-101 binding site and caused an attenuated expression of endogenous DNMT3a, which led to a reduction of global DNA methylation and the re-expression of tumor suppressor CDH1 via its promoter DNA hypomethylation. Functionally, restoration of miR-101 expression suppressed lung cancer cell clonability and migration, which recapitulated the DNMT3a knockdown effects. Interestingly, miR-101 synergized with decitabine to downregulate DNMT3a and to reduce DNA methylation. Importantly, ectopic miR-101 expression was sufficient to trigger in vivo lung tumor regression and the blockage of metastasis. Consistent with these phenotypes, examination of xenograft tumors disclosed an increase of miR-101, a decrease of DNMT3a and the subsequent DNA demethylation. These findings support that the loss or suppression of miR-101 function accelerates lung tumorigenesis through DNMT3a-dependent DNA methylation, and suggest that miR-101-DNMT3a axis may have therapeutic value in treating refractory lung cancer.Owing to a high propensity for recurrence and a high rate of metastasis at the advanced stages,^{1, 2, 3} lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic rule controlling chromosomal stability and gene expression.^{4, 5} It is under control of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), whose overexpression in lung cancer cells predicts worse outcomes.^{6, 7} It is postulated that DNMT overexpression induces DNA hypermethylation and silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), leading to an aggressive lung cancer. Indeed, enforced expression of DNMT1 or DNMT3a increases DNA methylation, while the abolition of DNMT expression by genetic depletion, microRNAs (miRs) or small molecules reduces genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation and restores TSG expression.^{8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13} As TSGs are the master controllers for cell multiplicity and their silencing predicts poor prognosis,^{14, 15} TSG re-expression via promoter DNA hypomethylation inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell differentiation.^{13, 16} Thus, DNMT gene abundance could serve as a target for anticancer therapy, but how DNMT upregulation occurs in lung cancer is incompletely understood.MiRs are small non-coding RNAs that crucially regulate target gene expression. Up to 30% of all protein-coding genes are predicted to be targeted by miRs,^{17, 18} supporting the key roles of miRs in controlling cell fate.^{19, 20, 21, 22} Research is showing that certain miRs are frequently dysregulated in cancers, including lung cancer.^{7, 23, 24} As miR targets can promote or inhibit cancer cell expansion, miRs have huge potential for acting as bona fide oncogenes (i.e., miR-21) or TSGs (i.e., miR-29b).^{7, 25} We and others demonstrated that the levels of DNMT1 or DNMT3a or DNMT3b are regulated by miR-29b, miR-148, miR-152 or miR-30c,^{7, 13, 26, 27} and overexpression of these miRs results in DNA hypomethylation and TSG reactivation with the concurrent blockage of cancer cell proliferation.^{7, 13} These findings underscore the importance of miRs as epigenetic modulators and highlight their therapeutic applications.MiR-101 is frequently silenced in human cancers^{28, 29, 30, 31} and, importantly, exhibits antitumorigenic properties when overexpressed. Mechanistically, miR-101 inactivation by genomic loss causes the overexpression of EZH2, a histone methyltransferase, via 3′-UTR targeting, which is followed by histone hypermethylation and aggressive tumorigenesis.^{29, 30, 32} However, whether and how miR-101 silencing contributes to DNA hypermethylation patterning in lung cancer is unclear. In this study, we explore the role of miR-101 in regulating DNMT3a expression and the impacts of miR-101-DNMT3a nexus on lung cancer pathogenesis. We showed that the expression of miR-101 and DNMT3a was negatively correlated in lung cancer. We presented evidence that ectopic miR-101 expression decreased DNMT3a levels, reduced global DNA methylation and upregulated CDH1 via its promoter DNA demethylation. The biological significance of miR-101-mediated DNA hypomethylation and CDH1 re-expression was evident by its inhibition of lung tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our findings mechanistically and functionally link miR-101 silencing to DNA hypermethylation in lung cancer cells.     

Mir-660 is downregulated in lung cancer patients and its replacement inhibits lung tumorigenesis by targeting MDM2-p53 interaction

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer-related death in developed countries. Despite the advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, the 5-year survival rate remains low. The research for novel therapies directed to biological targets has modified the therapeutic approach, but the frequent engagement of resistance mechanisms and the substantial costs, limit the ability to reduce lung cancer mortality. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs with known regulatory functions in cancer initiation and progression. In this study we found that mir-660 expression is downregulated in lung tumors compared with adjacent normal tissues and in plasma samples of lung cancer patients with poor prognosis, suggesting a potential functional role of this miRNA in lung tumorigenesis. Transient and stable overexpression of mir-660 using miRNA mimics reduced migration, invasion, and proliferation properties and increased apoptosis in p53 wild-type lung cancer cells (NCI-H460, LT73, and A549). Furthermore, stable overexpression using lentiviral vectors in NCI-H460 and A549 cells inhibited tumor xenograft growth in immunodeficient mice (95 and 50% reduction compared with control, respectively), whereas the effects of mir-660 overexpression were absent in H1299, a lung cancer cell line lacking p53 locus, both in in vitro and in vivo assays. We identified and validated mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) gene, a key regulator of the expression and function of p53, as a new direct target of mir-660. In addition, mir-660 expression reduced both mRNA and protein expression of MDM2 in all cell lines and stabilized p53 protein levels resulting in an upregulation of p21^WAF1/CIP1 in p53 wild-type cells. Our finding supports that mir-660 acts as a tumor suppressor miRNA and we suggest the replacement of mir-660 as a new therapeutic approach for p53 wild-type lung cancer treatment.Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, resulting in >1.4 million deaths/year.¹ Lung tumors are often discovered as locally advanced or metastatic disease, and despite improvements in molecular diagnosis and targeted therapies, the overall 5-year survival rate remains in the 10–20% range. Indeed, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poorly chemosensitive to most of the available agents with response rates ranging from 10 to 25%.² The discovery of recurrent mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase,³ as well as gene fusion products involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK),⁴ has led to a marked change in the treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, the most common type of lung cancer.^{5, 6} To date, patients with mutations in the EGFR gene, suitable for targeting by EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, represent roughly 10%, whereas the subgroup of tumors with ALK rearrangements, targeted by ALK inhibitors, is only ~5%.⁷ Thus, the majority of lung tumors lack effective treatment and novel therapeutic strategies are still needed.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNAs, 20–24 nucleotides long, that have important roles in almost all biological pathways,^{8, 9, 10, 11} and influence cancer-relevant processes, such as proliferation,¹² cell cycle,¹³ apoptosis,¹⁴ and migration.¹⁵ Many studies have reported the critical role of miRNAs in lung cancer pathogenesis and their potential as biomarkers for lung cancer risk stratification,¹⁶ outcome prediction,¹⁷ and classification of histological subtypes.^{18, 19} miRNAs are actively released by various cell types and can be detected in biological fluids, such as plasma and serum, making them suitable as circulating biomarkers in NSCLC.^{20, 21}There is limited evidence of mir-660 deregulation in cancer and little is known about its role in lung tumorigenesis and its putative target genes. Mir-660 has been reported to be upregulated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia^{22, 23} and in leukemic cells after treatment with 4-hydroxynonenal, a compound that induces differentiation and blocks proliferation of leukemic cells.²⁴ In a previous study we demonstrated that mir-660 was one of the 24 miRNAs deregulated in plasma samples of NSCLC patients identified in a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening trial.²⁰The p53 tumor suppressor protein is a key regulator of cell cycle G0/G1 checkpoint, senescence, and apoptosis in response to cellular stress signals.^{25, 26} Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2), a p53–E3 ubiquitin ligase,²⁷ is the principal negative regulator of the expression level and function of p53.^{28, 29} Several studies have illustrated different mechanisms of p53 regulation by MDM2,^{30, 31} such as binding transactivation region of p53,^{32, 33} promoting nuclear export and cytoplasmic accumulation of p53 by monoubiquitination,^{34, 35} and inducing p53 proteosomal degradation by polyubiquitination.³⁶ In addition, MDM2 gene has been reported to be amplified or overexpressed in a variety of human cancers, such as sarcoma,³⁷ lymphoma,³⁸ breast cancer,³⁹ lung cancer,⁴⁰ and testicular germ cell tumor.⁴¹ Several miRNAs targeting MDM2 have been identified, such as the mir-143/mir-145 cluster that can be induced by p53,⁴² as well as mir-25 and mir-32, known to inhibit tumor glioblastoma growth in mouse brain.⁴³In this study, we report that mir-660 is downregulated in tissue and plasma samples of lung cancer patients and demonstrate that mir-660 replacement impairs the functionality of p53 wild-type (wt) lung cancer cells and inhibits in vitro and in vivo tumor growth. We showed that all the effects observed after mir-660 overexpression were absent in p53 ko cells, identified MDM2 as mir-660 direct target gene and indicate impairment of the MDM2/p53 interaction as the mechanism underlying tumor growth inhibition.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.