Different phenotypes in vivo are associated with ATPase motif mutations in Schizosaccharomyces pombe minichromosome maintenance proteins

The six conserved MCM proteins are essential for normal DNA replication. They share a central core of homology that contains sequences related to DNA-dependent and AAA(+) ATPases. It has been suggested that the MCMs form a replicative helicase because a hexameric subcomplex formed by MCM4, -6, and -7 proteins has in vitro DNA helicase activity. To test whether ATPase and helicase activities are required for MCM protein function in vivo, we mutated conserved residues in the Walker A and Walker B motifs of MCM4, -6, and -7 and determined that equivalent mutations in these three proteins have different in vivo effects in fission yeast. Some mutations reported to abolish the in vitro helicase activity of the mouse MCM4/6/7 subcomplex do not affect the in vivo function of fission yeast MCM complex. Mutations of consensus CDK sites in Mcm4p and Mcm7p also have no phenotypic consequences. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses and in situ chromatin-binding experiments were used to study the ability of the mutant Mcm4ps to associate with the other MCMs, localize to the nucleus, and bind to chromatin. We conclude that the role of ATP binding and hydrolysis is different for different MCM subunits.     

Reconstitution of the Mcm2-7p heterohexamer,subunit arrangement,and ATP site architecture

The Mcm2-7p heterohexamer is the presumed replicative helicase in eukaryotic cells. Each of the six subunits is required for replication. We have purified the six Saccharomyces cerevisiae MCM proteins as recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli and have reconstituted the Mcm2-7p complex from individual subunits. Study of MCM ATPase activity demonstrates that no MCM protein hydrolyzes ATP efficiently. ATP hydrolysis requires a combination of two MCM proteins. The fifteen possible pairwise mixtures of MCM proteins yield only three pairs of MCM proteins that produce ATPase activity. Study of the Mcm3/7p ATPase shows that an essential arginine in Mcm3p is required for hydrolysis of the ATP bound to Mcm7p. Study of the pairwise interactions between MCM proteins connects the remaining MCM proteins to the Mcm3/7p pair. The data predict which subunits in the ATPase pairs bind the ATP that is hydrolyzed and indicate the arrangement of subunits in the Mcm2-7p heterohexamer.     

Recruitment of Mcm10 to Sites of Replication Initiation Requires Direct Binding to the Minichromosome Maintenance (MCM) Complex

Mcm10 is required for the initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication and contributes in some unknown way to the activation of the Cdc45-MCM-GINS (CMG) helicase. How Mcm10 is localized to sites of replication initiation is unclear, as current models indicate that direct binding to minichromosome maintenance (MCM) plays a role, but the details and functional importance of this interaction have not been determined. Here, we show that purified Mcm10 can bind both DNA-bound double hexamers and soluble single hexamers of MCM. The binding of Mcm10 to MCM requires the Mcm10 C terminus. Moreover, the binding site for Mcm10 on MCM includes the Mcm2 and Mcm6 subunits and overlaps that for the loading factor Cdt1. Whether Mcm10 recruitment to replication origins depends on CMG helicase assembly has been unclear. We show that Mcm10 recruitment occurs via two modes: low affinity recruitment in the absence of CMG assembly (“G₁-like”) and high affinity recruitment when CMG assembly takes place (“S-phase-like”). Mcm10 that cannot bind directly to MCM is defective in both modes of recruitment and is unable to support DNA replication. These findings indicate that Mcm10 is localized to replication initiation sites by directly binding MCM through the Mcm10 C terminus.     

Purification and functional inactivation of the fission yeast MCM(MCM-BP) complex

The MCM (mini-chromosome maintenance) complex is the core of the eukaryotic replicative helicase and comprises six proteins, Mcm2-Mcm7. In humans, a variant form of the complex has Mcm2 replaced by the MCM-BP protein. Recent results suggest that a similar complex exists in fission yeast with an essential role in DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Here, we describe the purification and subunit composition of the fission yeast MCM(Mcb1) complex. Using newly generated temperature-sensitive alleles, we show that loss of MCM(Mcb1) function leads to accumulation of DNA damage, checkpoint activation and cell cycle arrest, and provide evidence for a role for MCM(Mcb1) in meiosis.     

Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm3p, an essential nuclear protein, associates tightly with Nda4p (Mcm5p).

MCM proteins are required for the proper regulation of DNA replication. There are six MCM proteins in all eukaryotes which interact to form a large complex. We report the cloning of fission yeast mcm3 +. mcm3 + is essential and spores carrying a Delta mcm3 disruption arrest with an apparently replicated DNA content. The protein is found constitutively in the nucleus and levels remain constant throughout the cell cycle. Mcm3p binds particularly tightly to Nda4p (Mcm5p), but is loosely associated with the other Schizosaccharomyces pombe MCM proteins. Thus, Mcm3p is a peripheral MCM subunit.     

MCM-GINS and MCM-MCM interactions in vivo visualised by bimolecular fluorescence complementation in fission yeast

Background  

Each of the three individual components of the CMG complex (Cdc45, MCM and GINS) is essential for chromosomal DNA replication in eukaryotic cells, both for the initiation of replication at origins and also for normal replication fork progression. The MCM complex is a DNA helicase that most likely functions as the catalytic core of the replicative helicase, unwinding the parental duplex DNA ahead of the moving replication fork, whereas Cdc45 and the GINS complex are believed to act as accessory factors for MCM.     

Alternative Mechanisms for Coordinating Polymerase α and MCM Helicase

Functional coordination between DNA replication helicases and DNA polymerases at replication forks, achieved through physical linkages, has been demonstrated in prokaryotes but not in eukaryotes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we showed that mutations that compromise the activity of the MCM helicase enhance the physical stability of DNA polymerase α in the absence of their presumed linker, Mcm10. Mcm10 is an essential DNA replication protein implicated in the stable assembly of the replisome by virtue of its interaction with the MCM2-7 helicase and Polα. Dominant mcm2 suppressors of mcm10 mutants restore viability by restoring the stability of Polα without restoring the stability of Mcm10, in a Mec1-dependent manner. In this process, the single-stranded DNA accumulation observed in the mcm10 mutant is suppressed. The activities of key checkpoint regulators known to be important for replication fork stabilization contribute to the efficiency of suppression. These results suggest that Mcm10 plays two important roles as a linker of the MCM helicase and Polα at the elongating replication fork—first, to coordinate the activities of these two molecular motors, and second, to ensure their physical stability and the integrity of the replication fork.The key players of the replication machinery are the DNA polymerases that synthesize the leading and lagging daughter strands and the replicative helicase that unwinds the parental strands ahead of the polymerases. Coordination between the helicase and the polymerases is critical during replication. Uncoupling of these two molecular machines, especially during lagging strand synthesis, may result in an unrestrained helicase and the exposure of extensive single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), as observed in checkpoint mutants treated with hydroxyurea (HU) (37). Although there is no direct evidence, the implication is that the replicative helicase would be moving at a faster pace than would the DNA polymerase if synchrony were destroyed. In Escherichia coli, the replicative helicase (DnaB) and the primase (DnaG) are coupled by direct contact to form a tight complex (3). In T7, processivity of the gp5 polymerase in lagging strand synthesis requires coupling to the gp4 helicase (16). Recent studies of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggest that Mrc1 may couple DNA polymerase ɛ and the MCM helicase on the leading strand as well as activate the checkpoint response under replication stress (1, 22, 28). A candidate for coupling DNA polymerase α primase and the MCM helicase on the lagging strand is Mcm10, because Mcm10 interacts with subunits of the Mcm2-7 helicase (26, 29) as well as Polα (14, 33) and the stability of Polα requires Mcm10 in both budding yeast and human cells (8, 33). Mcm10 is an essential protein known to be involved in various aspects of the replication process. It is required during both initiation and elongation steps of DNA replication and interacts with a wide range of replication factors, such as ORC (17, 23, 29), MCM helicase, DNA polymerases ɛ and δ (23), Cdc45 (34), and Polα (33). Therefore, Mcm10 is important for the overall stability of the elongation complex, but its essential function remains unknown.Accumulating evidence suggests that the major function of many checkpoint proteins is the stabilization of the replication machinery at the fork (9, 22, 39), in addition to regulation of the temporal and spatial firing of origins and prevention of premature mitosis (31, 35, 39). The main signal that leads to checkpoint activation is believed to be the exposure of RPA-coated ssDNA (42). In Xenopus, ssDNA exposure has been shown to be mediated by a functional uncoupling between the polymerase and the helicase (7), and it has been shown that the level of checkpoint activation depended on the extent of ssDNA accumulation. This observation suggests that uncoupling of the polymerase and the helicase activity would result in ssDNA accumulation that in turn would activate the checkpoint pathway to stabilize the fork.In our study, we carried out a random and a gene-targeted mutagenesis screen to identify mutations that suppress the conditional lethality of mcm10 caused by the lability of Mcm10 in budding yeast (27). We found suppressor mutations in MCM2, which encodes one of the six distinct subunits of the MCM helicase. These mcm2 mutations correct the fork defects of mcm10, particularly that which leads to Polα instability. The altered helicase activity and activation of the checkpoint pathway of the mcm2 mutants appeared to be required for viability of mcm10 mcm2. We showed that uncoupling the MCM helicase and DNA polymerase α by destabilizing Mcm10 leads to accumulation of ssDNA, which is suppressed by reducing the MCM helicase activity. Our findings suggest that the physical coupling of Polα and the helicase by Mcm10 may be replaced by an alternative stabilization mechanism that involves slowing down the helicase and activating the checkpoint proteins.     

Cdt1 forms a complex with the minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM) and activates its helicase activity

Mcm4/6/7 forms a complex possessing DNA helicase activity, suggesting that Mcm may be a central component for the replicative helicase. Although Cdt1 is known to be essential for loading of Mcm onto the chromatin, its precise role in pre-RC formation and replication initiation is unknown. Using purified proteins, we show that Cdt1 forms a complex with Mcm4/6/7, Mcm2/3/4/5/6/7, and Mcm2/4/6/7 in glycerol gradient fractionation through interaction with Mcm2 and Mcm4/6. In the glycerol gradient fractionation, Mcm4/6/7-Cdt1 forms a complex (speculated to be a (Mcm4/6/7)2-Cdt13 assembly) in the presence of ATP, which is significantly larger than the Mcm4/6/7-Cdt1 complex generated in its absence. Furthermore, DNA binding and helicase activities of Mcm4/6/7 are significantly stimulated by Cdt1 protein in vitro. We generated a Cdt1 mutant, which fails to stimulate DNA binding and helicase activities of Mcm4/6/7. This mutant Cdt1 showed reduced interaction with Mcm and is deficient in the formation of a high molecular weight complex with Mcm. Thus, a productive interaction between Cdt1 and MCM appears to be essential for efficient loading of MCM onto template DNA, as well as for the efficient unwinding reaction.     

Mutational analysis of an archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein exterior hairpin reveals critical residues for helicase activity and DNA binding

Background

The mini-chromosome maintenance protein (MCM) complex is an essential replicative helicase for DNA replication in Archaea and Eukaryotes. While the eukaryotic complex consists of six homologous proteins (MCM2-7), the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus has only one MCM protein (ssoMCM), six subunits of which form a homohexamer. We have recently reported a 4.35Å crystal structure of the near full-length ssoMCM. The structure reveals a total of four β-hairpins per subunit, three of which are located within the main channel or side channels of the ssoMCM hexamer model generated based on the symmetry of the N-terminal Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus (mtMCM) structure. The fourth β-hairpin, however, is located on the exterior of the hexamer, near the exit of the putative side channels and next to the ATP binding pocket.

Results

In order to better understand this hairpin's role in DNA binding and helicase activity, we performed a detailed mutational and biochemical analysis of nine residues on this exterior β-hairpin (EXT-hp). We examined the activities of the mutants related to their helicase function, including hexamerization, ATPase, DNA binding and helicase activities. The assays showed that some of the residues on this EXT-hp play a role for DNA binding as well as for helicase activity.

Conclusions

These results implicate several current theories regarding helicase activity by this critical hexameric enzyme. As the data suggest that EXT-hp is involved in DNA binding, the results reported here imply that the EXT-hp located near the exterior exit of the side channels may play a role in contacting DNA substrate in a manner that affects DNA unwinding.

     

Schizosaccharomyces pombe minichromosome maintenance-binding protein (MCM-BP) antagonizes MCM helicase

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex, a replicative helicase, is a heterohexamer essential for DNA duplication and genome stability. We identified Schizosaccharomyces pombe mcb1(+) (Mcm-binding protein 1), an apparent orthologue of the human MCM-binding protein that associates with a subset of MCM complex proteins. mcb1(+) is an essential gene. Deletion of mcb1(+) caused cell cycle arrest after several generations with a cdc phenotype and disrupted nuclear structure. Mcb1 is an abundant protein, constitutively present across the cell cycle. It is widely distributed in cytoplasm and nucleoplasm and bound to chromatin. Co-immunoprecipitation suggested that Mcb1 interacts robustly with Mcm3-7 but not Mcm2. Overproduction of Mcb1 disrupted the association of Mcm2 with other MCM proteins, resulting in inhibition of DNA replication, DNA damage, and activation of the checkpoint kinase Chk1. Thus, Mcb1 appears to antagonize the function of MCM helicase.     

Incremental Genetic Perturbations to MCM2-7 Expression and Subcellular Distribution Reveal Exquisite Sensitivity of Mice to DNA Replication Stress

Mutations causing replication stress can lead to genomic instability (GIN). In vitro studies have shown that drastic depletion of the MCM2-7 DNA replication licensing factors, which form the replicative helicase, can cause GIN and cell proliferation defects that are exacerbated under conditions of replication stress. To explore the effects of incrementally attenuated replication licensing in whole animals, we generated and analyzed the phenotypes of mice that were hemizygous for Mcm2, 3, 4, 6, and 7 null alleles, combinations thereof, and also in conjunction with the hypomorphic Mcm4^Chaos3 cancer susceptibility allele. Mcm4^{Chaos3/Chaos3} embryonic fibroblasts have ∼40% reduction in all MCM proteins, coincident with reduced Mcm2-7 mRNA. Further genetic reductions of Mcm2, 6, or 7 in this background caused various phenotypes including synthetic lethality, growth retardation, decreased cellular proliferation, GIN, and early onset cancer. Remarkably, heterozygosity for Mcm3 rescued many of these defects. Consistent with a role in MCM nuclear export possessed by the yeast Mcm3 ortholog, the phenotypic rescues correlated with increased chromatin-bound MCMs, and also higher levels of nuclear MCM2 during S phase. The genetic, molecular and phenotypic data demonstrate that relatively minor quantitative alterations of MCM expression, homeostasis or subcellular distribution can have diverse and serious consequences upon development and confer cancer susceptibility. The results support the notion that the normally high levels of MCMs in cells are needed not only for activating the basal set of replication origins, but also “backup” origins that are recruited in times of replication stress to ensure complete replication of the genome.     

Functional cooperation between FACT and MCM is coordinated with cell cycle and differential complex formation

Background  

Functional cooperation between FACT and the MCM helicase complex constitutes an integral step during DNA replication initiation. However, mode of regulation that underlies the proper functional interaction of FACT and MCM is poorly understood.     

Helicase-AID: A novel molecular device for base editing at random genomic loci

CRISPR-enabled deaminase base editing has become a powerful tool for precisely editing nucleotides on the chromosome. In this study DNA helicases, such as Escherichia coli DnaB, were fused to activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) to form enzyme complexes which randomly introduces edited bases throughout the chromosome. DnaB-AID was found to increase 2.5 × 10³ fold relative to the mutagenesis frequency of wildtype. 97.9% of these edits were observed on the leading strand during DNA replication suggesting deamination to be highly coordinated with DNA replication. Using DnaB-AID, a 371.4% increase in β-carotene production was obtained following four rounds of editing. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae Helicase-AID was constructed by fusing AID to one of the subunits of eukaryotic helicase Mcm2-7 complex, MCM5. Using MCM5-AID, the average editing efficiency of five strains was 2.1 ± 0.4 × 10³ fold higher than the native genomic mutation rate. MCM5-AID was able to improve β-carotene production of S. cerevisiae 4742crt by 75.4% following eight rounds of editing. The S. cerevisiae MCM5-AID technique is the first biological tool for generating and accumulating single base mutations in eukaryotic chromosomes. Since the helicase complex is highly conservative in all eukaryotes, Helicase-AID could be adapted for various applications and research in all eukaryotic cells.     

Minichromosome maintenance proteins interact with checkpoint and recombination proteins to promote s-phase genome stability

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex plays essential, conserved roles throughout DNA synthesis: first, as a component of the prereplication complex at origins and, then, as a helicase associated with replication forks. Here we use fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) as a model to demonstrate a role for the MCM complex in protecting replication fork structure and promoting recovery from replication arrest. Loss of MCM function generates lethal double-strand breaks at sites of DNA synthesis during replication elongation, suggesting replication fork collapse. MCM function also maintains the stability of forks stalled by hydroxyurea that activate the replication checkpoint. In cells where the checkpoint is activated, Mcm4 binds the Cds1 kinase and undergoes Cds1-dependent phosphorylation. MCM proteins also interact with proteins involved in homologous recombination, which promotes recovery from arrest by ensuring normal mitosis. We suggest that the MCM complex links replication fork stabilization with checkpoint arrest and recovery through direct interactions with checkpoint and recombination proteins and that this role in S-phase genome stability is conserved from yeast to human cells.     

DNA unwinding is an Mcm complex-dependent and ATP hydrolysis-dependent process

Minichromosome maintenance proteins (Mcm) are essential in all eukaryotes and are absolutely required for initiation of DNA replication. The eukaryotic and archaeal Mcm proteins have conserved helicase motifs and exhibit DNA helicase and ATP hydrolysis activities in vitro. Although the Mcm proteins have been proposed to be the replicative helicase, the enzyme that melts the DNA helix at the replication fork, their function during cellular DNA replication elongation is still unclear. Using nucleoplasmic extract (NPE) from Xenopus laevis eggs and six purified polyclonal antibodies generated against each of the Xenopus Mcm proteins, we have demonstrated that Mcm proteins are required during DNA replication and DNA unwinding after initiation of replication. Quantitative depletion of Mcms from the NPE results in normal replication and unwinding, confirming that Mcms are required before pre-replicative complex assembly and dispensable thereafter. Replication and unwinding are inhibited when pooled neutralizing antibodies against the six different Mcm2-7 proteins are added during NPE incubation. Furthermore, replication is blocked by the addition of the Mcm antibodies after an initial period of replication in the NPE, visualized by a pulse of radiolabeled nucleotide at the same time as antibody addition. Addition of the cyclin-dependent kinase 2 inhibitor p21(cip1) specifically blocks origin firing but does not prevent helicase action. When p21(cip1) is added, followed by the non-hydrolyzable analog ATPgammaS to block helicase function, unwinding is inhibited, demonstrating that plasmid unwinding is specifically attributable to an ATP hydrolysis-dependent function. These data support the hypothesis that the Mcm protein complex functions as the replicative helicase.     

Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Dynamic Interactions of the Minichromosome Maintenance Complex (MCM) in the Cellular Response to Etoposide Induced DNA Damage

The minichromosome maintenance complex (MCM) proteins are required for processive DNA replication and are a target of S-phase checkpoints. The eukaryotic MCM complex consists of six proteins (MCM2–7) that form a heterohexameric ring with DNA helicase activity, which is loaded on chromatin to form the pre-replication complex. Upon entry in S phase, the helicase is activated and opens the DNA duplex to recruit DNA polymerases at the replication fork. The MCM complex thus plays a crucial role during DNA replication, but recent work suggests that MCM proteins could also be involved in DNA repair. Here, we employed a combination of stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative proteomics with immunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein-tagged fusion proteins to identify proteins interacting with the MCM complex, and quantify changes in interactions in response to DNA damage. Interestingly, the MCM complex showed very dynamic changes in interaction with proteins such as Importin7, the histone chaperone ASF1, and the Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 3 (CHD3) following DNA damage. These changes in interactions were accompanied by an increase in phosphorylation and ubiquitination on specific sites on the MCM proteins and an increase in the co-localization of the MCM complex with γ-H2AX, confirming the recruitment of these proteins to sites of DNA damage. In summary, our data indicate that the MCM proteins is involved in chromatin remodeling in response to DNA damage.DNA replication during the S phase necessitates that the entire genome be duplicated with the minimum of errors. Thousands of replication forks are involved in this process and they must be coordinated to ensure that every section of DNA is only replicated once. Errors in DNA replication are likely to be a major cause of the genetic instability that can lead to cancer (1). Cells are able to prevent duplicate replication of DNA by having a distinct stage that occurs during the G1 phase when replication origins are “licensed” for replication, a process that involves the preloading of several proteins involved in DNA replication (2). As DNA is replicated at each origin, these proteins are removed, thereby ensuring that each origin fires only once during each S phase. DNA damage response kinases activated by the stalled forks prevent the replication machinery from being activated in new chromosome domains, indicating a tight relationship between the DNA damage response and the DNA replication pathways (3, 4).The first step of the replication licensing mechanism is the loading of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM)¹ proteins on to replication origins along with origin recognition complex proteins, Cdt6 and Cdt1 (5). The eukaryotic MCM complex consists of six paralogs that form a heterohexameric ring. All eukaryotic organisms possess six homologous proteins (MCM2-MCM7) that form a heterohexameric ring that belong to the family of AAA+ (ATPase associated with various cellular activities) proteins and share similarities to other hexameric helicases (6). Even though additional MCM proteins have been identified in higher eukaryotes, the MCM2-MCM7 complex remains the prime candidate for the role of replicative helicase (7). MCM2–7 is required for both initiation and elongation of DNA replication, with its regulation at each stage being an essential player of eukaryotic DNA replication (8). As a critical mechanism to ensure only a single round of DNA replication, the loading of additional MCM2–7 complexes onto origins of replication is inactivated by redundant mechanisms after passage into S phase (9).The MCM complex plays a crucial role in determining the replication potential of cells, but recent work suggests that MCM proteins are not only targets of the S-phase checkpoints, but they also interact directly with components of the checkpoint and repair pathways (10, 11). In yeast, temperature sensitive MCM cells at restrictive temperature contain numerous foci recognized by the phosphorylated histone H2AX antibody (12), suggesting a role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Although, in principle, only two DNA helicase activities are required to establish a bidirectional replication fork from each origin, a relatively large excess of MCM complexes are loaded at origins of replication and distributed along the chromatin (13). Their function is not well understood, and most of them are displaced from the DNA during S-phase, apparently without having played an active role in DNA replication. The “MCM paradox” refers to the fact that, at least in yeast, Xenopus, Drosophila, and mammalian cells, it is possible to reduce the concentration of MCM proteins by more than 90% without impairing DNA replication (14–18) and also refers to the observation that the majority of MCM complexes do not localize to the sites of DNA synthesis in mammalian cells, further suggesting a potential role for the MCM proteins beyond DNA replication.Using a combination of stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)–based quantitative proteomics (19) with immunoprecipitation of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged fusion proteins (20), we identified differences in protein binding partners with the MCM complex following DNA damage. Stable cell lines expressing GFP-tagged MCM2 and MCM5 were used in immunoprecipitation experiments from cells that were either mock treated, or treated with Etoposide for 15, 60, and 240 min. Etoposide is an antitumor drug that stabilizes a covalent complex between the DNA topoisomerase II and DNA by interfering with the cleavage-ligation reaction of the topoisomerase (21). This revealed specific interaction between the MCM complex and several proteins such as Nucleophosmin, BAG2, UPP1, and HDAC10. Interestingly, the MCM complex showed dynamic changes in interaction with Importin7 and the histone chaperone ASF1, and a decrease in interaction with the Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 3 (CHD3) resulting from the treatment with etoposide. This increase in interaction with ASF1 was followed by an enrichment of histone proteins, suggesting a novel role for the MCM proteins in histone deposition on chromatin following DNA damage.     

The PS1 Hairpin of Mcm3 Is Essential for Viability and for DNA Unwinding In Vitro

The pre-sensor 1 (PS1) hairpin is found in ring-shaped helicases of the AAA+ family (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) of proteins and is implicated in DNA translocation during DNA unwinding of archaeal mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) and superfamily 3 viral replicative helicases. To determine whether the PS1 hairpin is required for the function of the eukaryotic replicative helicase, Mcm2-7 (also comprised of AAA+ proteins), we mutated the conserved lysine residue in the putative PS1 hairpin motif in each of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mcm2-7 subunits to alanine. Interestingly, only the PS1 hairpin of Mcm3 was essential for viability. While mutation of the PS1 hairpin in the remaining MCM subunits resulted in minimal phenotypes, with the exception of Mcm7 which showed slow growth under all conditions examined, the viable alleles were synthetic lethal with each other. Reconstituted Mcm2-7 containing Mcm3 with the PS1 mutation (Mcm3_K499A) had severely decreased helicase activity. The lack of helicase activity provides a probable explanation for the inviability of the mcm3 _K499A strain. The ATPase activity of Mcm2-7_3K499A was similar to the wild type complex, but its interaction with single-stranded DNA in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay and its associations in cells were subtly altered. Together, these findings indicate that the PS1 hairpins in the Mcm2-7 subunits have important and distinct functions, most evident by the essential nature of the Mcm3 PS1 hairpin in DNA unwinding.     

Interactions and subcellular distribution of DNA replication initiation proteins in eukaryotic cells

For initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication the origin recognition complex (ORC) associates with chromatin sites and constitutes a landing pad allowing Cdc6, Cdt1 and MCM proteins to accomplish the pre-replication complex (pre-RC). In S phase, the putative MCM helicase is assumed to move away from the ORC to trigger DNA unwinding. By using the fluorescence-based assays bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) we show in live mammalian cells that one key interaction in pre-RC assembly, the interaction between Orc2 and Orc3, is not restricted to the nucleus but also occurs in the cytoplasm. BRET assays also revealed a direct interaction between Orc2 and nuclear localization signal (NLS)-depleted Orc3. Further, we assessed the subcellular distribution of Orc2 and Orc3 in relation to MCM proteins Mcm3 and Mcm6 as well as to a key protein involved in elongation of DNA replication, proliferating nuclear cell antigen (PCNA). Our findings illustrate the spatial complexity of the elaborated process of DNA replication as well as that the BRET and BiFC techniques are novel tools that could contribute to our understanding of the processes at the very beginning of the duplication of the genome.     

Roles of Mcm7 and Mcm4 subunits in the DNA helicase activity of the mouse Mcm4/6/7 complex

Mcm, which is composed of six structurally related subunits (Mcm2-7), is essential for eukaryotic DNA replication. A subassembly of Mcm, the Mcm4/6/7 double-trimeric complex, possesses DNA helicase activity, and it has been proposed that Mcm may function as a replicative helicase at replication forks. We show here that conserved ATPase motifs of Mcm7 are essential for ATPase and DNA helicase activities of the Mcm4/6/7 complex. Because uncomplexed Mcm7 displayed neither ATPase nor DNA helicase activity, Mcm7 contributes to the DNA helicase activity of the Mcm complex through interaction with other subunits. In contrast, the Mcm4/6/7 complex containing a zinc finger mutant of Mcm4 with partially impaired DNA binding activity exhibited elevated DNA helicase activity. The Mcm4/6/7 complex containing this Mcm4 mutant tended to dissociate into trimeric complexes, suggesting that the zinc finger of Mcm4 is involved in subunit interactions of trimers. The Mcm4 mutants lacking the N-terminal 35 or 112 amino acids could form hexameric Mcm4/6/7 complexes, but displayed very little DNA helicase activity. In conjunction with the previously reported essential role of Mcm6 in ATP binding (You, Z., Komamura, Y., and Ishimi, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8003-8015), our data indicate distinct roles of Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7 subunits in activation of the DNA helicase activity of the Mcm4/6/7 complex.