Comparison of 2 Intensification Regimens with Rapid-Acting Insulin Aspart in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Once-Daily Insulin Detemir and Oral Antidiabetes Drugs: The Step-Wise Randomized Study

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of 2 intensification strategies for stepwise addition of prandial insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin detemir.MethodsThis randomized, controlled, parallel-group, open-label, 48-week trial compared the stepwise addition of insulin aspart to either the largest meal (titration based on premeal glucose values [SimpleSTEP]) or to the meal with the largest prandial glucose increment (titration based on postmeal glucose values [ExtraSTEP]) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral antidiabetes drugs. After 12 weeks of basal insulin detemir dosage optimization, participants with a hemoglobin A₁ level of 7% or greater entered three 12-week treatment periods with stepwise addition of a first insulin aspart bolus, then a second, and then a third, if hemoglobin A_1c remained at 7% or greater after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. Endpoints included hemoglobin A_1c (primary endpoint), fasting plasma glucose, self-measured plasma glucose, adverse events, and hypoglycemia.ResultsTwo hundred ninety-six patients were randomly assigned to treatment with insulin aspart in the SimpleSTEP (n = 150) and ExtraSTEP (n = 146) groups. Hemoglobin A_1c decreased by approximately 1.2% in both groups, to 7.5 ± 1.1% (SimpleSTEP) and 7.7 ± 1.2% (ExtraSTEP) at end of trial (estimated treatment difference, SimpleSTEP ExtraSTEP: -0.06% [95% confidence interval, -0.29 to 0.17]). Self-measured plasma glucose levels decreased with both regimens. At trial end, approximately 75% of patients in each group were using 3 prandial injections. The frequency of adverse events and hypoglycemia was low and similar between groups.ConclusionThe SimpleSTEP and ExtraSTEP strategies for stepwise addition of insulin aspart to 1 or more meals were equally effective at intensifying therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycemic control on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:727-736)     

Chromium Effects on Glucose Tolerance and Insulin Sensitivity in Persons at Risk for Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of daily chromium picolinate supplementation on serum measures of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in patients at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, modified cross-over clinical trial with 6-month sequences of intervention and placebo followed by a 6-month postintervention assessment. Adult patients with impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or metabolic syndrome were enrolled. Participants received 6-month sequences of chromium picolinate or placebo at 1 of 2 dosages (500 or 1000 mcg daily). Primary outcome measures were change in fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance testing, fasting and 2-hour insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, blood pressure, endothelial function, hemoglobin A_1c, lipids, and urinary microalbumin.ResultsFifty-nine participants were enrolled. No changes were seen in glucose level, insulin level, or HOMA-IR (all P > .05) after 6 months of chromium at either dosage level (500 mcg or 1000 mcg daily) when compared with placebo. None of the secondary outcomes improved with either chromium dosage compared with placebo (P > .05).ConclusionsChromium supplementation does not appear to ameliorate insulin resistance or impaired glucose metabolism in patients at risk for type 2 diabetes and thus is unlikely to attenuate diabetes risk. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:16-25)     

Successful treatment of prediabetes in clinical practice: targeting insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of targeted pharmacologic interventions to reverse documented pathophysiologic abnormalities in prediabetes.MethodsPatients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG) were treated with insulin sensitizers (pioglitazone + metformin) or insulin sensitizers + exenatide on the basis of oral glucose tolerance testing-derived indices of insulin resistance and impaired b-cell function. Patients who declined pharmacologic therapy received lifestyle modification only.ResultsOne hundred five patients with IGT and/or IFG were treated with insulin sensitizers (pioglitazone + metformin) (n = 40), insulin sensitizers + exenatide (n = 47), or lifestyle modification only (n = 18). After a mean follow-up period of 8.9 months, the lifestyle modification group demonstrated no significant changes in fasting plasma glucose, plasma glucose area under the curve during oral glucose tolerance testing, insulin sensitivity, or b-cell function. In the pioglitazone + metformin group (24 hours off medication), fasting plasma glucose fell from 109 to 102 mg/dL; plasma glucose area under the curve decreased by 12.0%; insulin sensitivity and b-cell function improved by 42% and 50%, respectively (all P < .001); 14.3% converted to normal glucose tolerance; and no patient developed diabetes. In the pioglitazone + metformin + exenatide group (24 hours off medication), fasting plasma glucose fell from 109 to 98 mg/dL; plasma glucose area under the curve decreased by 21.2%; insulin sensitivity and b-cell function improved by 52% and 109%, respectively (all P < .001); 59.1% of patients with IGT reverted to normal glucose tolerance; and no patient developed diabetes.ConclusionsTargeted pathophysiologic therapy based on oral glucose tolerance test-derived measures of insulin sensitivity and b-cell function can be implemented in general internal medicine and endocrine practice and is associated with marked improvement in glucose tolerance and reversion of prediabetes to normal glucose tolerance in more than 50% of patients. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18: 342-350)     

A Retrospective Study Comparing Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Glargine As Basal Therapy In Prednisone-Associated Diabetes Mellitus In Hospitalized Patients

ObjectiveTo compare glycemic outcomes in hospitalized patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) vs glargine as basal insulin for management of glucocorticoid-associated hyperglycemia.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records in prednisone-treated adult patients with hyperglycemia in a university hospital. Consecutive patients were selected in both the NPH and glargine cohorts using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were assessed in each cohort. Glycemic outcomes were analyzed by comparing fasting blood glucose, mean daily blood glucose concentration, median daily blood glucose concentration, and the number of hypoglycemic episodes on a prespecified index day.ResultsOne hundred twenty patients were included: 60 patients in the NPH cohort and 60 patients in the glargine cohort. The weight-based insulin requirement was lower in the NPH cohort than in the glargine cohort (0.27 ± 0.2 units/kg vs 0.34 ± 0.2 units/kg [P = .04] for basal insulin and 0.26 ± 0.2 units/kg vs 0.36 ± 0.2 units/kg [P = .03] for bolus insulin). NPH and glargine cohorts were similar regarding age, sex, race, body mass index, hemoglobin A_1c, serum creatinine, and prednisone dosage. Glycemic outcomes in the NPH cohort compared with outcomes in the glargine cohort were similar regarding mean fasting blood glucose concentration (134 ± 49 mg/dL vs 139 ± 54 mg/dL [P = .63]), mean daily blood glucose (167 ± 46 mg/dL vs 165 ± 52 mg/dL [P = .79]), median blood glucose (160 ± 49 mg/dL vs 159 ± 57 mg/dL [P = .90]), and number of hypoglycemic episodes per day (0.12 ± 0.3 vs 0.10 ± 0.3 [P = .77]).ConclusionsNPH and glargine appear to be equally effective as basal insulin in the management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients receiving prednisone. However, the total daily insulin doses used were lower in the NPH cohort. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:712-719)     

Sitagliptin Compared with Thiazolidinediones as a Third-Line Oral Antihyperglycemic Agent in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo compare sitagliptin and thiazolidinediones as third-line oral antihyperglycemic agents among ethnic minority patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsIn an open-label, single-arm design, we treated type 2 diabetic patients who had suboptimal diabetes control on maximum tolerated dosages of metformin plus sulfonylureas with the addition of sitagliptin, 100 mg daily, and compared their responses with findings from a historical control group of similar patients treated with rosiglitazone, 8 mg daily, or pioglitazone, 45 mg daily, as their third-line oral agent. Patients were assessed bimonthly, and those who achieved hemoglobin A_1c levels less than 7.5% at 4 months continued through 1 year of follow-up.Results:One hundred eight patients were treated with sitagliptin, and 104 patients constituted the historical control group treated with rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. At baseline, sitagliptinand thiazolidinedione-treated patients had identical hemoglobin A_1c levels (mean ± SD) (9.4 ± 1.8% and 9.4 ± 1.9%, respectively) and similar known diabetes duration (6.7 ± 5.0 years and 7.6 ± 5.8 years, respectively). Hemoglobin A_1c was reduced in both groups at 4 months (P < .001), but the reduction was greater with thiazolidinediones than with sitagliptin (-2.0 ± 1.7% vs -1.3 ± 1.8%; P = .006), as was the proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin A_1c level less than 7.5% (62% vs 46%; P = .026). Of all patients achieving a hemoglobin A_1c level less than 7.5% at 4 months, the same proportions in each group sustained their hemoglobin A_1c level less than 7.5% by 12 months (59% vs 58%). Sitagliptin was well tolerated.ConclusionsAmong ethnic minority patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes while taking maximum tolerated dosages of metformin and sulfonylureas, thirdline add-on therapy with a thiazolidinedione controlled hyperglycemia more effectively than sitagliptin after 4 months. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:691-698)     

Liraglutide as Additional Treatment to Insulin in Obese Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveBecause approximately 40% of patients with type 1 diabetes have the metabolic syndrome, we tested the hypothesis that addition of liraglutide to insulin in obese patients with type 1 diabetes will result in an improvement in plasma glucose concentrations, a reduction in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), a fall in systolic blood pressure, and weight loss.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of data obtained from 27 obese patients with type 1 diabetes treated with liraglutide in addition to insulin. Patients were also treated for hypertension. Paired t tests were used to compare the changes in HbA1c, insulin doses, body weight, body mass index, 4-week mean blood glucose concentrations (28-day insulin pump mean blood glucose), blood pressure, and lipid parameters prior to and 180 ± 14 days after liraglutide therapy.ResultsMean glucose concentrations fell from 191 ± 6 to 170 ± 6 mg/dL (P = .002). HbA1c fell from 7.89 ± 0.13% to 7.46 ± 0.13% (P = .001), without an increase in frequency of hypoglycemia. Mean body weight fell from 96.20 ± 3.68 kg to 91.56 ± 3.78 kg (P<.0001). Daily total and bolus doses of insulin fell from 73 ± 6 to 60 ± 4 (P = .008) units and from 40 ± 5 to 29 ± 3 units (P = .011), respectively. Mean systolic blood pressure fell from 130 ± 3 to 120 ± 4 mm Hg (P = .020).ConclusionAddition of liraglutide to insulin in obese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus leads to improvements in glycemic control and HbA1c and to reductions in insulin dose, systolic blood pressure, and body weight. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:963-967)     

Outcomes Associated With Insulin Therapy Disruption After Hospital Discharge Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus who Had Used Insulin Before and During Hospitalization

ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes associated with insulin therapy disruption after hospital discharge in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had used insulin before and during hospitalization.MethodsIn this observational, retrospective analysis of medical records obtained from a coordinated health system in the United States, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had used insulin 30 days before and during hospitalization were included. Clinical and cost outcomes were compared between patients who continued insulin therapy and those who had disrupted insulin therapy after hospital discharge.ResultsIn total, 2160 records were analyzed (851 patients with continued insulin therapy and 1309 patients with disrupted insulin therapy). Mean baseline glycated hemoglobin A_1c levels were 8.56% and 7.73% in patients who continued insulin therapy and patients who disrupted insulin therapy, respectively (P <.001), suggesting that patients who discontinued insulin therapy had better glycemic control at baseline. Continued insulin therapy was associated with an expected greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin A_1c (P <.001); similar hypoglycemia rates; lower risks of all-cause hospital readmission, diabetesrelated readmission, and all-cause emergency department visits; and improved survival. Continued insulin therapy was associated with $3432 lower total medical service costs than disrupted therapy over the 6-month postdischarge period.ConclusionEnsuring adherence to insulin therapy in patients who require insulin therapy after hospitalization should be a priority for postdischarge patient care programs. However, the clinical implications of this study are limited by the fact that it could not be determined whether all patients required insulin therapy after hospital discharge. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:651-659)     

Exenatide Therapy in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Insulin

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of exenatide on clinical parameters in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose hyperglycemia is not adequately controlled despite treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, clinical progress of 52 obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide, 5 mcg twice daily, in an outpatient setting was reviewed. Treatment initiation was between September and December 2005. Mean follow-up period was 26 weeks. Thirty-eight patients took exenatide regularly (Group A); 14 patients discontinued exenatide because of insurance, personal, or economic reasons (Group B). Measurements at baseline and at follow-up included body weight; blood pressure; and levels of hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma lipids. Insulin dosage requirements were assessed.ResultsMean body weight (± standard error of the mean) decreased by 6.46 ± 0.8 kg (P < .001) in Group A and increased by 2.4 ± 0.6 kg in Group B (P < .001). In Group A, mean HbA_1c decreased by 0.6 ± 0.21% (P = .007), and the insulin dosage requirement decreased for rapid-acting and mixed insulins (P < .02). In Group A, means of the following parameters decreased: serum total cholesterol by 8.5 ± 3.3% (P = .03), triglycerides by 26 ± 7.6% (P = .01), systolic blood pressure by 9.2 ± 3.3 mm Hg (P = .02), and high-sensitivity CRP by 34 ± 14.3% (P = .05). These indices did not change in Group B.ConclusionExenatide effectively treats obese patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin, leading to weight loss and reduction in levels of HbA_lc, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and high-sensitivity CRP. (Endocr Pract 2007;13:444-450)     

Diurnal Glucose Patterns of Exenatide Once Weekly: A 1-Year Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Ambulatory Glucose Profile Analysis

ObjectiveTo use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to characterize diurnal glucose patterns produced by a novel formulation of exenatide consisting of biodegradable polymeric microspheres that entrap exenatide and provide extended release enabling once-weekly administration.MethodsWe performed a subgroup analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes who participated in a multicenter trial (DURATION-1: Effects of Exenatide Long- Acting Release on Glucose Control and Safety in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) comparing once-weekly with twice-daily formulations of exenatide. We are the only center to use CGM with ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) analysis to characterize glucose exposure, variability, and stability in participants assigned to exenatide once weekly.ResultsSeven of the 303 patients in the larger study population were included in the subgroup analysis. Mean age (57.6 ± 7 years), weight (102 ± 17 kg), body mass index (34 ± 3 kg/m²), and duration of diabetes (5 ± 2 years) were comparable to characteristics of the larger study population. At 30 weeks and 52 weeks, participants treated with exenatide once weekly had a mean reduction in hemoglobin A_1c level of 1.3 ± 0.3% and 1.0 ± 0.3%, respectively (P < .05). CGM analysis revealed a significant (P < .01) decrease in diurnal glucose exposure for 4 participants during nocturnal and daytime periods. Excess glucose exposure (compared with reference values) decreased in 6 of 7 participants, as did glucose variability. Glucose stability improved in 5 participants. The percentage of glucose values less than 70 mg/dL initially increased during the first half of the study then decreased to baseline levels by study end.ConclusionsIndividual glucose profiles revealed that changes in hemoglobin A_1c did not consistently parallel alterations in glucose exposure, variability, and stability. AGPs provided a visual representation of improved glucose responses to exenatide once weekly. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:326-334)     

Fasting Versus Postprandial Hyperglycemia as a Treatment Target to Lower Elevated Hemoglobin A1C

Objective: Postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG) may need addressing when glycemic control cannot be maintained in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We investigated whether glycated hemoglobin A_1c (A_1c) levels ≥7.0% can indicate postprandial defects warranting prandial therapy after optimized basal insulin therapy.Methods: From 6 clinical trials of insulin glargine treatment, data were pooled from 496 patients with A_1c ≥7.0% after 24 weeks. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were summarized according to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) target achievement (<130 mg/dL), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) levels, and PPBG increments (ΔPPBG). Basal and postprandial contributions to hyperglycemia were determined.Results: After 24 weeks of insulin glargine titration, A_1c change from baseline was greater in patients with FPG <130 mg/dL versus ≥130 mg/dL (-1.35% versus -1.11%, respectively; P = .0275), but with increased confirmed hypoglycemia rates (blood glucose <70 mg/dL; 4.06 events/patient-year versus 3.31 events/patient-year; P = .0170). However, increased severe hypoglycemia rates were observed in patients with FPG ≥130 mg/dL. At week 24, postprandial contributions to hyperglycemia increased (>60% regardless of PPBG). Patients with high FPG had lower, but substantial, relative postprandial contributions versus patients achieving FPG target. A similar pattern was observed according to whether patients had a ΔPPBG ≥50 mg/dL after any meal.Conclusion: After optimized basal insulin therapy, elevated A_1c is the most effective indicator of residual PPHG, regardless of existent FPG or PPBG. When confronted with an uncontrolled A_1c after reasonable titration of basal insulin, clinicians should be aware of probable postprandial contributions to hyperglycemia and consider prandial therapy.Abbreviations:A_1c = glycated hemoglobin A_1cAUC = area under the curveAUC_B = area under the curve (basal hyperglycemia)AUC_G = total area under the curve (total glucose)AUC_N = area under the curve (normal glycemic exposure)AUC_P = area under the curve (postprandial hyperglycemia)BHG = basal hyperglycemiaFBG = fasting blood glucoseFPG = fasting plasma glucoseGLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1HE = hyperglycemic exposureOADs = oral antidiabetes drugsPPBG = postprandial blood glucoseΔPPBG = change in postprandial blood glucosePPHG = postprandial hyperglycemiaSMBG = self-monitored blood glucoseT2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

Computerized Physician Order Entry- Based Hyperglycemia Inpatient Protocol and Glycemic Outcomes: The CPOE-HIP Study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of implementing a computerized physician order entry (CPOE)-based hyperglycemia inpatient protocol (HIP) on glycemic outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study compared blood glucose values, hemoglobin A_1c values, diabetes medication profiles, and demographic data of diabetic patients admitted to medicine services between March 15, 2006, and April 11, 2006 (before CPOE-HIP protocol was adopted), with data of diabetic patients admitted between October 3, 2007, and October 30, 2007 (1 year after CPOE-HIP protocol was implemented).ResultsA total of 241 diabetic patients comprised the pre-CPOE-HIP group and 197 patients comprised the post-CPOE-HIP group. After the protocol was adopted, there was a decrease of 10.8 mg/dL in the mean glucose concentration per patient-day (175.5 ± 81.2 mg/dL vs 164.7 ± 82 mg/dL, P < .001). Additional glycemic control improvements included a 5% increase in patient-days with serum glucose concentrations between 70 and 150 mg/ dL (41.1% vs 46.1%, P = .008) and a 3.1% decrease in patient-days with glucose concentrations above 299 mg/dL (16.9% vs 13.8%, P = .023). The percentage of patientdays with glucose concentrations less than or equal to 50 mg/dL was not significantly different (0.95% vs 1.27%, P = .15). Compliance with the American Diabetes Association recommendation for hemoglobin A_1c inpatient testing frequency increased from 37.3% to 64.5% (P < .001). The length of stay did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsImplementation of a hospital-wide, CPOE-based, hyperglycemia management protocol had a favorable impact onglucose targets, decreasing excessively high glucose levels without increasing clinically meaningful hypoglycemic events. Compliance with hemoglobin A_1c testing recommendations also improved. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:389-397)     

Clinical Effects of Sodium-Glucose Transporter Type 2 Inhibitors in Patients With Partial Lipodystrophy

ObjectiveSevere insulin resistance syndromes, such as lipodystrophy, lead to diabetes, which is challenging to control. This study explored the safety and efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in a series of 12 patients with severe insulin resistance due to partial lipodystrophy.MethodsA retrospective chart review of the safety (N = 22) and efficacy (N = 12) of SGLT2is in patients with partial lipodystrophy was conducted at our institution. The efficacy outcomes included hemoglobin A1C level, insulin dose, fasting plasma glucose level, C-peptide level, lipid profile, 24-hour urinary glucose excretion, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood pressure before and after 12 months of SGLT2i treatment.ResultsThe hemoglobin A1C level decreased after SGLT2i treatment (at baseline: 9.2% ± 2.0% [77.0 ± 21.9 mmol/mol]; after 12 months: 8.4% ± 1.8% [68.0 ± 19.7 mmol/mol]; P = .028). Significant reductions were also noted in systolic (P = .011) and diastolic blood pressure (P = .013). There was a trend toward a decreased C-peptide level (P = .071). The fasting plasma glucose level, lipid level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged. The adverse effects included extremity pain, hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis (in a patient who was nonadherent to insulin), pancreatitis (in a patient with prior pancreatitis), and fungal infections.ConclusionSGLT2is reduced the hemoglobin A1C level in patients with partial lipodystrophy, with a similar safety profile compared with that in patients with type 2 diabetes. After individual consideration of the risks and benefits of SGLT2is, these may be considered a part of the treatment armamentarium for these rare forms of diabetes, but larger trials are needed to confirm these findings.     

Prevalencia de alteraciones del metabolismo hidrocarbonado en una población infanto-juvenil con obesidad grave

IntroductionThere is currently a disproportionate increase in childhood and adolescent obesity worldwide, together with other disorders involving substantial cardiometabolic risk in adulthood, such as alterations in carbohydrate metabolism.ObjectiveTo establish the prevalence of prediabetes, defined as impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) after an oral glucose tolerance test, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2) in a pediatric population with severe obesity. Additionally, we aimed to assess clinical metabolic differences between prediabetic obese patients and obese subjects without prediabetes.Material and methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in children and adolescents with severe obesity (>97th percentile). The variables studied were age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose and oral glucose tolerance test, insulinemia, insulin resistance assessed by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure.ResultsA total of 133 patients were included: 67 boys (50.4%) and 66 girls (49.6%), with a mean age of 12.17±3.27 years. Fourteen patients (10.52%) had prediabetes (10 IFG, 3 IGT, 1 IFG+IGT): 7 girls and 8 boys, with a mean age of 13.2±3.3 years. One patient had DM2 (0.75%). Patients with prediabetes had significantly higher concentrations of fasting glucose (98±10.76 vs 88.53±6.3 mg/d; p=0.001), insulinemia (35.38±14.22 vs 22.95±14.30 μU/ml; p=0.009) and HOMA index (8.10±3.24 vs 4.89±3.27; p=0.004) than patients without impaired carbohydrate metabolism. These patients also had higher values of HbA_1c, triglycerides, blood pressure and HDL concentrations, although differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionsThe prevalence of prediabetes (IFG/IGT) in children with severe obesity was high (10.52%). These patients should therefore be investigated to establish early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Obese patients with prediabetes have significantly higher levels of insulin and insulin resistance than individuals without impaired carbohydrate metabolism.     

Preadmission Glycemic Control and Changes to Diabetes Mellitus Treatment Regimen After Hospitalization

ObjectiveTo evaluate treatment patterns associated with diabetes medication regimen changes after hospitalization on the basis on preadmission hemoglobin A_1c levels.MethodsIn this retrospective database analysis, patients with a diabetes diagnosis, hospitalization, and documented hemoglobin A_1c level within the 90 days leading up to hospital admission were identified in an administrative claims database. Treatment regimens were assessed before and after hospitalization. The proportion of patients who had progression, reduction, or no change in therapy was compared across hemoglobin A_1c subgroups: hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0%, hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9%, and hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0%.ResultsFour hundred patients were included (192 in hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% group, 94 in hemoglobin A_1c 7.0% 7.9% group, and 114 in hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% group). Demographically, hemoglobin A_1c subgroups did not differ significantly (mean age, 57 years; 47.5% male). With respect to therapeutic regimen overall, 28%, 24%, and 48% of patients experienced progression, reduction, and no change, respectively. Across hemoglobin A_1c subgroups, 37.7% of patients in the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup had therapy progression compared with 26% and 20.2% in the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% and hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroups, respectively (P = .032 and P = .006, respectively). Within the progression category, progression via insulin initiation was significantly higher in the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup (55.8%) than in the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% subgroup (16%, P < .001), but not significantly higher than in the hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroup (36.8%, P = .084). In the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup, a lower percentage of patients, 35.1%, experienced no therapy change than in both the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% subgroup (52.6%) and the hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroup (54.3%) (P = .003 and P = .006, respectively). There was no difference between subgroups in reduction of therapy.ConclusionsA higher proportion of patients with a hemoglobin A_1c level ≥ 8.0% had progression of their antidiabetes therapy after hospitalization and fewer patients had no change in therapy than those in lower hemoglobin A_1c subgroups. These data suggest that clinicians may be using hemoglobin A_1c measurements to guide discharge planning treatment decisions. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:371-375)     

Benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Clinical Practice

ObjectiveTo determine the benefits of personal con- tinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) outside of a controlled clinical trial in a single ambulatory diabetes clinic.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed medical records of all patients who began CGM in our university-based clinical practice between July 2006 and October 2008. Data pertaining to 1 year before initiation of CGM through January 2009 were collected. All patient visits were performed by any 1 of 7 board-certified endo- crinologists and/or 5 certified diabetes educators. A severe hypoglycemic event was considered to have occurred if the patient reported requiring assistance or losing conscious- ness, or if there was documentation from another source (eg, an emergency department visit). Analysis of the effect of CGM on hemoglobin A_1c and occurrence of severe hypoglycemia was performed.ResultsA total of 117 patients initiated CGM between July 2006 and October 2008 and used CGM for at least 2 months (total experience on CGM, 1136 patient-months; average 9.7 months per patient). Mean age was 44.5 ± 12.8 years (range, 14.3-71.7 years), and average duration of dia- betes mellitus was 23.9 years. All patients were using insu- lin pumps before initiation of CGM, including 10 patients with type 2 diabetes. Sixty-eight patients (58%) had pre- existing hypoglycemia unawareness. Average hemoglobin A_1c level for 1 year before CGM initiation was 7.6 ± 1.1%, and with CGM use it dropped to 7.2 ± 0.8% (P <.001). Forty-two patients had severe hypoglycemic events in the year before CGM use or during CGM use. Overall, CGM use was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of severe hypoglycemic episodes (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.65).ConclusionsPersonal CGM, in a real-world setting, improves glucose control and reduces the rate of severe hypoglycemic episodes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:371-375)     

Impact of Race/Ethnicity on the Efficacy and Safety of Commonly used Insulin Regimens: A Post HOC Analysis of Clinical Trials in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo explore the impact of race/ethnicity on the efficacy and safety of commonly used insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsIn this post hoc analysis, pooled data from 11 multinational clinical trials involving 1455 patients with type 2 diabetes were used to compare specific insulin treatments in Latino/Hispanic, Asian, African-descent, and Caucasian patients. Insulin treatments included once daily insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn (BASAL), insulin lispro mix 75/25 twice daily (LMBID), or insulin lispro mix 50/50 three times daily (LMTID).ResultsRace/ethnicity was associated with significant outcome differences for each of the insulin regimens. BASAL therapy was associated with greater improvement in several measures of glycemic control among Latino/Hispanic patients compared with Caucasian patients (lower end point hemoglobin A1c, greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c from baseline, and a larger proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin A1c level < 7%). In contrast, LMBID therapy was associated with higher end point hemoglobin A_1c and a smaller decrease in hemoglobin A_1c from baseline in Latino/Hispanic and Asian patients than in Caucasian patients. Furthermore, fewer Asian patients attained a hemoglobin A_1c level < 7% than did Caucasians patients. For LMTID therapy, hemoglobin A_1c outcomes were comparable across patient groups. Fasting blood glucose and glycemic excursions varied among racial/ethnic groups for the 3 insulin regimens. Weight change was comparable among racial/ethnic groups in each insulin regimen. During treatment with LMTID, Asian patients experienced higher incidence and rate of severe hypoglycemia than Caucasian patients.ConclusionsLatino/Hispanic, Asian, and African-descent patients with type 2 diabetes show different metabolic responses to insulin therapy, dependent in part on insulin type and regimen intensity. (Endocr Pract. 2010: 818-828:pp)     

Continuous Subcutaneous Pramlintide Infusion Therapy In Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Observations From A Pilot Study

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous (basal-bolus) subcutaneous pramlintide infusion (CSPI) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.MethodsA 16-week, open-label, single-arm pilot study enrolled 11 patients (mean ± SD values: age, 39.9 ± 4.0 years; hemoglobin A1c, 8.20% ± 0.60%; weight, 92.3 ± 18.4 kg; body mass index, 29.7 ± 5.1 kg/m²) with longterm type 1 diabetes mellitus (20.7 ± 1.3 years; duration of pump therapy, 9.5 ± 6.0 years). Pramlintide basal infusion was begun with continuous subcutaneous infusion at 9 μg/h. After 3 days, premeal bolus doses of pramlintide were initiated at 15 μg and titrated to 60 μg per meal. Basal and bolus insulin doses were reduced 10% on initiation of CSPI and adjusted thereafter as needed to prevent hypoglycemia.ResultsAfter 16 weeks of pramlintide therapy, mean ± SD hemoglobin A1c decreased to 7.85% ± 0.74% (-0.35%). The fasting glucose level declined from 198.2 ± 66.9 mg/dL to 135.8 ± 63.9 mg/dL. The mean weight decreased to 91.8 ± 20.1 kg (-0.5 kg) at week 12. The daily bolus insulin requirement decreased 20%; daily basal insulin was unchanged (27.7 ± 11.7 U). All patients experienced mild postprandial hypoglycemia, but no severe hypoglycemia was reported. Three of the 11 study participants experienced mild initial nausea, but all patients successfully titrated bolus doses to 60 μg within 3 weeks.ConclusionIn this pilot study of 11 patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin pumps, CSPI seemed safe and well tolerated, did not alter pramlintide pharmacokinetic variables, and reduced fasting glucose levels. Larger studies of this method for pramlintide administration seem warranted. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:689-695)     

Reduction of Insulin Resistance and Plasma Glucose Level by Salsalate Treatment in Persons With Prediabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of salsalate as an antiinflammatory agent on insulin resistance and glycemic control in persons with prediabetes.MethodsIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 66 persons who had prediabetes on the basis of the American Diabetes Association criteria were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to receive salsalate (3 g daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and insulin, glucose 2 hours after oral administration of 75 g of glucose, hemoglobin A_1c, lipid profile, homeo stasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function were determined before and after treatment.ResultsSalsalate treatment reduced the FPG level from 5.86 ± 0.07 mmol/L to 5.20 ± 0.11 mmol/L and HOMA-IR from 4.2 ± 0.9 to 3.8 ± 0.3 (P = .01 for both changes). Homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell func tion increased in the salsalate-treatment group from 139.8 ± 11.0 to 189.4 ± 24.6 (P = .01). At the end of the study, FPG, HOMA-IR, and insulin levels were significantly different between salsalate and placebo groups (5.20 ± 0.11 mmol/L versus 5.53 ± 0.10 mmol/L, 3.8 ± 0.3 versus 4.4 ± 0.9, and 16.1 ± 1.9 μIU/mL versus 18.2 ± 2 μIU/mL, respectively; P < .05 for all). There were no persistent complications after salsalate therapy.ConclusionTreatment with salsalate can reduce insu lin resistance and the FPG level in subjects with predia betes. Determination of the long-term safety and efficacy of the use of salsalate necessitates further investigation. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:826-833)     

Clinical effects of long-term metreleptin treatment in patients with lipodystrophy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term clinical effect of treatment with metreleptin (an analogue of human leptin) on glycemic and lipid abnormalities and markers of hepatic steatosis in patients with inherited or acquired lipodystrophy.MethodsFifty-five patients (36 with generalized lipodystrophy and 19 with partial lipodystrophy) with at least 1 of 3 metabolic abnormalities (diabetes mellitus, fasting triglyceride level ≥ 200 mg/dL, and insulin resistance) and low leptin levels received subcutaneous injections of metreleptin once or twice daily in an ongoing clinical trial at the National Institutes of Health.ResultsAt baseline, hemoglobin A_1c-8.5% ± 2.1% (mean ± standard deviation [SD])-and triglycerides—479 ± 80 mg/dL (geometric mean ± standard error [SE])-were substantially elevated. Robust and sustained reductions in both variables were evident for the observed patient population during a 3-year metreleptin treatment period (-2.1% ± 0.5% [mean ± SE] and -35.4% ± 13.7% [mean ± SE], respectively). Mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were elevated at baseline (100 ± 120 U/L and 71 ± 77 U/L [mean ± SD], respectively) and decreased by -45 ± 19 U/L and -33 ± 14 U/L (mean ± SE), respectively, during the 3-year metreleptin treatment period. Improvements in hemoglobin A_1c, triglycerides, ALT, and AST were more pronounced in the subsets of patients having elevated levels at baseline. The most notable adverse events observed in this patient population were likely attributable to underlying metabolic abnormalities or comorbidities.ConclusionMetreleptin treatment substantially reduced glycemic variables, triglycerides, and liver enzymes (ALT and AST) and demonstrated durability of response throughout a 3-year treatment period. These results support metreleptin as a potential treatment for certain metabolic disorders (for example, diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia) associated with lipodystrophy. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:922-932)