Heparan and chondroitin sulfate on growth plate perlecan mediate binding and delivery of FGF-2 to FGF receptors.

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 regulates chondrocyte proliferation in the growth plate. Heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans bind FGF-2. Perlecan, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) in the developing growth plate, however, contains both HS and chondroitin sulfate (CS) chains. The binding of FGF-2 to perlecan isolated from the growth plate was evaluated using cationic filtration (CAF) and immunoprecipitation (IP) assays. FGF-2 bound to perlecan in both the CAF and IP assays primarily via the HS chains on perlecan. A maximum of 123 molecules of FGF-2 was calculated to bind per molecule of perlecan. When digested with chondroitinase ABC to remove its CS chains, perlecan augmented binding of FGF-2 to the FGFR-1 and FGFR-3 receptors and also increased FGF-2 stimulation of [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation in BaF3 cells expressing these FGF receptors. These data show that growth plate perlecan binds to FGF-2 by its HS chains but can only deliver FGF-2 to FGF receptors when its CS chains are removed.     

Specificity for fibroblast growth factors determined by heparan sulfate in a binary complex with the receptor kinase.

A divalent cation-dependent association between heparin or heparan sulfate and the ectodomain of the FGF receptor kinase (FGFR) restricts FGF-independent trans-phosphorylation and supports the binding of activating FGF to self-associated FGFR. Here we show that in contrast to heparin, cellular heparan sulfate forms a binary complex with FGFR that discriminates between FGF-1 and FGF-2. FGFR type 4 (FGFR4) in liver parenchymal cells binds only FGF-1, whereas FGFR1 binds FGF-1 and FGF-2 equally. Cell-free complexes of heparin and recombinant FGFR4 bound FGF-1 and FGF-2 equally. However, in contrast to FGFR1, when recombinant FGFR4 was expressed back in epithelial cells by transfection, it failed to bind FGF-2 unless heparan sulfate was depressed by chlorate or heparinase treatment. Isolated heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) from liver cells in cell-free complexes with FGFR4 restored the specificity for FGF-1 and supported the binding of both FGF-1 and FGF-2 when complexed with FGFR1. In contrast, FGF-2 bound equally well to complexes of both FGFR1 and FGFR4 formed with endothelial cell-derived HSPG, but the endothelial HSPG was deficient for the binding of FGF-1 to both FGFR complexes. These data suggest that a heparan sulfate subunit is a cell type- and FGFR-specific determinant of the selectivity of the FGFR signaling complex for FGF. In a physiological context, the heparan sulfate subunit may limit the redundancy among the current 18 FGF polypeptides for the 4 known FGFR.     

Dermatan sulfate binds and potentiates activity of keratinocyte growth factor (FGF-7)

FGF-7 is induced after injury and induces the proliferation of keratinocytes. Like most members of the FGF family, the activity of FGF-7 is strongly influenced by binding to heparin, but this glycosaminoglycan is absent on keratinocyte cell surfaces and minimally present in the wound environment. In this investigation we compared the relative activity of heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate B (dermatan sulfate), glycosaminoglycans that are present in wounds. A lymphoid cell line (BaF/KGFR) containing the FGF-7 receptor (FGFR2 IIIb) was treated with FGF-7 and with various glycosaminoglycans. FGF-7 did not support cell proliferation in the absence of glycosaminoglycan or with addition of heparan sulfate or chondroitin sulfate A/C but did stimulate BaF/KGFR division in the presence of dermatan sulfate or highly sulfated low molecular weight fractions of dermatan. Dermatan sulfate also enabled FGF-7-dependent phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and promoted binding of radiolabeled FGF-7 to FGFR2 IIIb. In addition, dermatan sulfate and FGF-7 stimulated growth of normal keratinocytes in culture. Thus, dermatan sulfate, the predominant glycosaminoglycan in skin, is the principle cofactor for FGF-7.     

Role of heparan sulfate as a tissue-specific regulator of FGF-4 and FGF receptor recognition.

FGF signaling uses receptor tyrosine kinases that form high-affinity complexes with FGFs and heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans at the cell surface. It is hypothesized that assembly of these complexes requires simultaneous recognition of distinct sulfation patterns within the HS chain by FGF and the FGF receptor (FR), suggesting that tissue-specific HS synthesis may regulate FGF signaling. To address this, FGF-2 and FGF-4, and extracellular domain constructs of FR1-IIIc (FR1c) and FR2-IIIc (FR2c), were used to probe for tissue-specific HS in embryonic day 18 mouse embryos. Whereas FGF-2 binds HS ubiquitously, FGF-4 exhibits a restricted pattern, failing to bind HS in the heart and blood vessels and failing to activate signaling in mouse aortic endothelial cells. This suggests that FGF-4 seeks a specific HS sulfation pattern, distinct from that of FGF-2, which is not expressed in most vascular tissues. Additionally, whereas FR2c binds all FGF-4-HS complexes, FR1c fails to bind FGF-4-HS in most tissues, as well as in Raji-S1 cells expressing syndecan-1. Proliferation assays using BaF3 cells expressing either FR1c or FR2c support these results. This suggests that FGF and FR recognition of specific HS sulfation patterns is critical for the activation of FGF signaling, and that synthesis of these patterns is regulated during embryonic development.     

The role of vascular-derived perlecan in modulating cell adhesion,proliferation and growth factor signaling

Smooth muscle cell proliferation can be inhibited by heparan sulfate proteoglycans whereas the removal or digestion of heparan sulfate from perlecan promotes their proliferation. In this study we characterized the glycosaminoglycan side chains of perlecan isolated from either primary human coronary artery smooth muscle or endothelial cells and determined their roles in mediating cell adhesion and proliferation, and in fibroblast growth factor (FGF) binding and signaling. Smooth muscle cell perlecan was decorated with both heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate, whereas endothelial perlecan contained exclusively heparan sulfate chains. Smooth muscle cells bound to the protein core of perlecan only when the glycosaminoglycans were removed, and this binding involved a novel site in domain III as well as domain V/endorepellin and the α₂β₁ integrin. In contrast, endothelial cells adhered to the protein core of perlecan in the presence of glycosaminoglycans. Smooth muscle cell perlecan bound both FGF1 and FGF2 via its heparan sulfate chains and promoted the signaling of FGF2 but not FGF1. Also endothelial cell perlecan bound both FGF1 and FGF2 via its heparan sulfate chains, but in contrast, promoted the signaling of both growth factors. Based on this differential bioactivity, we propose that perlecan synthesized by smooth muscle cells differs from that synthesized by endothelial cells by possessing different signaling capabilities, primarily, but not exclusively, due to a differential glycanation. The end result is a differential modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and growth factor signaling in these two key cellular constituents of blood vessels.     

The involvement of heparan sulfate (HS) in FGF1/HS/FGFR1 signaling complex

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling begins with the formation of a ternary complex of FGF, FGF receptor (FGFR), and heparan sulfate (HS). Multiple models have been proposed for the ternary complex. However, major discrepancies exist among those models, and none of these models have evaluated the functional importance of the interacting regions on the HS chains. To resolve the discrepancies, we measured the size and molar ratio of HS in the complex and showed that both FGF1 and FGFR1 simultaneously interact with HS; therefore, a model of 2:2:2 FGF1.HS.FGFR1 was shown to fit the data. Using genetic and biochemical methods, we generated HSs that were defective in FGF1 and/or FGFR1 binding but could form the signaling ternary complex. Both genetically and chemically modified HSs were subsequently assessed in a BaF3 cell mitogenic activity assay. The ability of HS to support the ternary complex formation was found to be required for FGF1-stimulated cell proliferation. Our data also proved that specific critical groups and sites on HS support complex formation. Furthermore, the molar ratio of HS, FGF1, and FGFR1 in the ternary complex was found to be independent of the size of HS, which indicates that the selected model can take place on the cell surface proteoglycans. Finally, a mechanism for the FGF.FGFR signaling complex formation on cell membrane was proposed, where FGF and FGFR have their own binding sites on HS and a distinct ternary complex formation site is directly responsible for mitogenic activity.     

Differential effects of heparin saccharides on the formation of specific fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and FGF receptor complexes.

Heparan sulfates (HS) play an important role in the control of cell growth and differentiation by virtue of their ability to modulate the activities of heparin-binding growth factors, an issue that is particularly well studied for fibroblast growth factors (FGFs). HS/heparin co-ordinate the interaction of FGFs with their receptors (FGFRs) and are thought to play a critical role in receptor dimerization. Biochemical and crystallographic studies, conducted mainly with FGF-2 or FGF-1 and FGF receptors 1 and 2, suggests that an octasaccharide is the minimal length required for FGF- and FGFR-induced dimerization and subsequent activation. In addition, 6-O-sulfate groups are thought to be essential for binding of HS to FGFR and for receptor dimerization. We show here that oligosaccharides shorter than 8 sugar units support activation of FGFR2 IIIb by FGF-1 and interaction of FGFR4 with FGF-1. In contrast, only relatively long oligosaccharides supported receptor binding and activation in the FGF-1.FGFR1 or FGF-7.FGFR2 IIIb setting. In addition, both 6-O- and 2-O-desulfated heparin activated FGF-1 signaling via FGFR2 IIIb, whereas neither one stimulated FGF-1 signaling via FGFR1 or FGF-7 via FGFR2 IIIb. These findings indicate that the structure of HS required for activating FGFs is dictated by the specific FGF and FGFR combination. These different requirements may reflect the differences in the mode by which a given FGFR interacts with the various FGFs.     

Epac1 increases migration of endothelial cells and melanoma cells via FGF2‐mediated paracrine signaling

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF2) regulates endothelial and melanoma cell migration. The binding of FGF2 to its receptor requires N‐sulfated heparan sulfate (HS) glycosamine. We have previously reported that Epac1, an exchange protein activated by cAMP, increases N‐sulfation of HS in melanoma. Therefore, we examined whether Epac1 regulates FGF2‐mediated cell–cell communication. Conditioned medium (CM) of melanoma cells with abundant expression of Epac1 increased migration of human umbilical endothelial cells (HUVEC) and melanoma cells with poor expression of Epac1. CM‐induced increase in migration was inhibited by antagonizing FGF2, by the removal of HS and by the knockdown of Epac1. In addition, knockdown of Epac1 suppressed the binding of FGF2 to FGF receptor in HUVEC, and in vivo angiogenesis in melanoma. Furthermore, knockdown of Epac1 reduced N‐sulfation of HS chains attached to perlecan, a major secreted type of HS proteoglycan that mediates the binding of FGF2 to FGF receptor. These data suggested that Epac1 in melanoma cells regulates melanoma progression via the HS–FGF2‐mediated cell–cell communication.     

Requirement for anticoagulant heparan sulfate in the fibroblast growth factor receptor complex.

A divalent cation-dependent association between heparin or heparan sulfate and the ectodomain of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor kinase (FGFR) restricts FGF-independent trans-phosphorylation between self-associated FGFR and determines specificity for and mediates binding of activating FGF. Here we show that only the fraction of commercial heparin or rat liver heparan sulfate which binds to immobilized antithrombin formed an FGF-binding binary complex with the ectodomain of the FGFR kinase. Conversely, only the fraction of heparin that binds to immobilized FGFR inhibited Factor Xa in the presence of antithrombin. Only the antithrombin-bound fraction of heparin competed with (3)H-heparin bound to FGFR in absence of FGF, whereas both antithrombin-bound and unretained fractions competed with radiolabeled heparin bound independently to FGF-1 and FGF-2. The antithrombin-bound fraction of heparin was required to support the heparin-dependent stimulation of DNA synthesis of endothelial cells by FGF-1. The requirement for divalent cations and the antithrombin-binding motif distinguish the role of heparan sulfate as an integral subunit of the FGFR complex from the wider range of effects of heparan sulfates and homologues on FGF signaling through FGFR-independent interactions with FGF.     

Specific heparan sulfate structures modulate FGF10-mediated submandibular gland epithelial morphogenesis and differentiation

FGF10, a heparan sulfate (HS)-binding growth factor, is required for branching morphogenesis of mouse submandibular glands (SMGs). HS increases the affinity of FGF10 for FGFR2b, which forms an FGF10.FGFR2b.HS ternary signaling complex, and results in diverse biological outcomes, including proliferation and epithelial morphogenesis. Defining the HS structures involved in specific FGF10-mediated events is critical to understand how HS modulates growth factor signaling in specific developmental contexts. We used HS-deficient BaF3/FGFR2b cells, which require exogenous HS to proliferate, to investigate the HS requirements for FGF10-mediated proliferation and primary SMG epithelia to investigate the structural requirements of HS for FGF10-mediated epithelial morphogenesis. In BaF3/FGFR2b cells, heparin with at least 10 saccharides and 6-O-, 2-O-, and N-sulfates were required for maximal proliferation. During FGF10-mediated SMG epithelial morphogenesis, HS increased proliferation and end bud expansion. Defined heparin decasaccharide libraries showed that 2-O-sulfation with either an N-or 6-O-sulfate induced end bud expansion, whereas decasaccharides with 6-O-sulfation alone induced duct elongation. End bud expansion resulted from increased FGFR1b signaling, with increased FGFR1b, Fgf1, and Spry1 as well as increased Aqp5 expression, a marker of end bud differentiation. Duct elongation was associated with expression of Cp2L1, a marker of developing ducts. Collectively, these findings show that the size and sulfate patterns of HS modulate specific FGF10-mediated events, such as proliferation, duct elongation, end bud expansion, and differentiation, and provide mechanistic insight as to how the developmental localization of specific HS structures in tissues influences FGF10-mediated morphogenesis and differentiation.     

The cell surface proteoglycan syndecan-1 mediates fibroblast growth factor-2 binding and activity

Binding of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) to receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs) and signaling is facilitated by binding of FGF to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). There are multiple families of HSPGs, including extracellular and cell surface forms. An important and potentially controversial question is whether cell surface forms of HSPGs act as positive or negative regulators of FGF signaling. This study examines the ability of the cell surface HSPG syndecan-1 to regulate FGF binding and signaling. HSPG-deficient Raji lymphoma cells, expressing a transfected syndecan-1 cDNA (Raji S1 cells), were used as HSPG “donor” cells. BaF3 cells, expressing an FGFR1 cDNA (FR1C-11 cells), were used as FGFR “reporter” cells. Using Raji S1 cells preincubated with FGF, it was found that they formed heterotypic aggregates with FR1C-11 cells in the presence of FGF-2, but not FGF-1. In addition, the FR1C-11 cells demonstrated FGF-2, but not FGF-1, dependent survival when cultured on fixed Raji S1 cells. Thus, Raji syndecan-1 (1) differentially regulates the binding and signaling of FGFs 1 and 2 and (2) acts as a positive regulator of FGF-2 signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 174:310–321, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Quantitative assessment of FGF regulation by cell surface heparan sulfates

Heparin/heparan sulfate-like glycosaminoglycans (HSGAGs) modulate the activity of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family of proteins. Through interactions with both FGFs and FGF receptors (FGFRs), HSGAGs mediate FGF-FGFR binding and oligomerization leading to FGFR phosphorylation and initiation of intracellular signaling cascades. We describe a methodology to examine the impact of heparan sulfate fine structure and source on FGF-mediated signaling. Mitogenic assays using BaF3 cells transfected with specific FGFR isoforms allow for the quantification of FGF1 and FGF2 induced responses independent of conflicting influences. As such, this system enables a systematic investigation into the role of cell surface HSGAGs on FGF signaling. We demonstrate this approach using cell surface-derived HSGAGs and find that distinct HSGAGs elicit differential FGF response patterns through FGFR1c and FGFR3c. We conclude that this assay system can be used to probe the ability of distinct HSGAG species to regulate the activity of specific FGF-FGFR pairs.     

Heparan sulfate is required for interaction and activation of the epithelial cell fibroblast growth factor receptor-2IIIb with stromal-derived fibroblast growth factor-7

Summary Fibroblast growth factor-7 (FGF-7) and a specific splice variant of the FGF tyrosine kinase receptor family (FGFR2IIIb) constitute a paracrine signaling system from stroma to epithelium. Different effects of the manipulation of cellular heparan sulfates and heparin on activities of FGF-7 relative to FGF-1 in epithelial cells suggest that pericellular heparan sulfates may regulate the activity of FGF-7 by a different mechanism than other FGFs. In this report, we employ the heparan sulfate-binding protein, protamine sulfate, to reversibly block cellular heparan sulfates. Protamine sulfate, which does not bind significantly to FGF-7 or FGFR2IIIb, inhibited FGF-7 activities, but not those of epidermal growth factor. The inhibition was overcome by increasing the concentrations of FGF-7 or heparin. Heparin was essential for binding of FGF-7 to recombinant FGFR2IIIb expressed in insect cells or FGFR2IIIb purified away from cell products. These results suggest that, similar to other FGF polypeptides, heparan sulfate within the pericellular matrix is required for activity of FGF-7. Differences in response to heparin and alterations in the BULK heparan sulfate content of cells likely reflect FGF-specific differences in the cellular repertoire of multivalent heparan sulfate chains required for assembly and activation of the FGF signal transduction complex.     

The core protein of growth plate perlecan binds FGF-18 and alters its mitogenic effect on chondrocytes

Fibroblast growth factor-18 (FGF-18) has been shown to regulate the growth plate chondrocyte proliferation, hypertrophy and cartilage vascularization necessary for endochondral ossification. The heparan sulfate proteoglycan perlecan is also critical for growth plate chondrocyte proliferation. FGF-18 null mice exhibit a skeletal dwarfism similar to that of perlecan null mice. Growth plate perlecan contains chondroitin sulfate (CS) and heparan sulfate (HS) chains and FGF-18 is known to bind to heparin and to heparan sulfate from some sources. We used cationic filtration and immunoprecipitation assays to investigate the binding of FGF-18 to perlecan purified from the growth plate and to recombinant perlecan domains expressed in COS-7 cells. FGF-18 bound to perlecan with a K_d of 145 nM. Near saturation, ∼103 molecules of FGF-18 bound per molecule of perlecan. At the lower concentrations used, FGF-18 bound with a K_d of 27.8 nM. This binding was not significantly altered by chondroitinase nor heparitinase digestion of perlecan, but was substantially and significantly reduced by reduction and alkylation of the perlecan core protein. This indicates that the perlecan core protein (and not the CS nor HS chains) is involved in FGF-18 binding. FGF-18 bound equally to full-length perlecan purified from the growth plate and to recombinant domains I-III and III of perlecan. These data indicate that low affinity binding sites for FGF-18 are present in cysteine-rich regions of domain III of perlecan. FGF-18 stimulated ³H-thymidine incorporation in growth plate chondrocyte cultures derived from the lower and upper proliferating zones by 9- and 14-fold, respectively. The addition of perlecan reversed this increased incorporation in the lower proliferating chondrocytes by 74% and in the upper proliferating cells by 37%. These results suggest that perlecan can bind FGF-18 and alter the mitogenic effect of FGF-18 on growth plate chondrocytes.     

Membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan-supported FGF2-FGFR1 signaling: evidence in support of the "cooperative end structures" model

Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2)-initiated FGF receptor (FGFR)-signaling requires the assistance of heparin/heparan sulfate. Here, we evaluated the effects of different heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG)-expressing cell lines and HSPGs derived from these cells on FGF2-induced FGFR1-phosphorylation in heparan sulfate-negative BaF3 cells. HSPGs supplied in membrane-associated form, by presenting cells, were all effective promotors of FGF2-initiated FGFR1 phosphorylation, independently of their nature (syndecan/glypican) or cellular origin (human lung fibroblasts, transfected Namalwa cells, or transfected K562 cells). A treatment with heparitinase initially stimulated, but finally completely inhibited, the activity of these presenting cells. In comparison, equivalent amounts of soluble HSPGs, obtained by trypsinization of these cells or by immunopurification from cell extracts, did not promote FGF2-induced FGFR1-phosphorylation, yet removal of the less anionic species or a further treatment with heparitinase converted these soluble fractions into potent activators of FGF2/FGFR1 signaling. Extrapolating from current structural models, we suggest that FGFR dimerization and autophosphorylation is supported by cooperative "heparin-like end structures," and that cell surface association and concentration compensate for the relative scarcity of such end structures in native HSPGs. In this model, "proteolytic" shedding of heparan sulfate would act as a diluting, down-regulatory mechanism, while "heparanolytic" shedding might act as an up-regulatory mechanism, by increasing the concentration of these end structures.     

Ligand binding properties of binary complexes of heparin and immunoglobulin-like modules of FGF receptor 2

Epithelial cells, which express FGFR2IIIb, bind and respond to FGF-1, FGF-7 and FGF-10, but not FGF-2. Stromal cells, which bind and respond to FGF-1 and FGF-2, but not FGF-7 and FGF-10, express FGFR2IIIc or FGFR1IIIc. Here we show that when both isolated FGFR2betaIIIb and FGFR2betaIIIc or their common Ig module II are allowed to affinity select heparin from a mixture, the resultant binary complexes bound FGF-1, FGF-2, and FGF-7 with nearly equal affinity. In addition, FGF-2 and FGF-7 bound to both heparin-Ig module IIIb and IIIc complexes, but FGF-1 bound to neither Ig module III. The results show that in isolation both Ig modules II and III of FGFR2 can interact with heparin and that each exhibits a binding site for FGF. We suggest that the specificity of FGFR2IIIb and FGFR2IIIc is dependent on the cell membrane environment and heparin/heparan sulfate. Ig modules II and III cooperate both within monomers and across dimers with cellular heparan sulfates to confer cell type-dependent specificity of the FGFR complex for FGF.     

Differential ability of heparan sulfate proteoglycans to assemble the fibroblast growth factor receptor complex in situ.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) require heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) as cofactors for signaling. The heparan sulfate chains (HS) mediate stable high affinity binding of FGFs to their receptor tyrosine kinases (FR) and may specifically regulate FGF activity. A novel in situ binding assay was developed to examine the ability of HSPGs to promote FGF/FR binding using a soluble FR fusion construct (FR1-AP). This fusion protein probe forms a dimer in solution, simulating the dimerization or oligomerization that is thought to occur at the cell surface physiologically. In frozen sections of human skin, FGF-2 binds to keratinocytes and basement membranes of epidermis and dermal blood vessels. In contrast, in skin preincubated with FGF-2, FR1-AP binds avidly to FGF-2 immobilized on keratinocyte cell surfaces, but fails to bind to basement membranes at the dermo-epidermal junction or dermal microvessels despite the fact that these structures bind large amounts of FGF-2. Apparently, basement membrane and cell surface HSPGs differ in their ability to mediate the assembly of a FGF/FR signaling complex presumably due to structural differences of the heparan sulfate chains.     

Heparin differentially regulates the interaction of fibroblast growth factor-4 with FGF receptors 1 and 2.

Fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF4), like other FGFs, shares a high affinity for the anionic glycosaminoglycans heparin and heparan sulfate (HS), which in turn enhance FGF-receptor (FGFR) binding and activation. Here we demonstrate using a cell free system that, at low concentrations of heparin, FGF4 binds only to FGFR-2, while much higher heparin levels are required for binding to FGFR-1. Chemical crosslinking of radiolabeled FGF4 to the soluble FGF receptors confirms the preferential formation of FGF4-FGFR-2 complexes under restricted heparin availability, with maximal ligand-receptor interactions at almost 20-fold lower heparin concentrations then those required for the affinity labeling of FGFR-1. In accordance, HS-deficient cells expressing FGFR-2 proliferate in response to FGF4 at extremely low exogenous heparin concentrations, while FGFR-1 expressing cells are completely unresponsive under the same conditions. We suggest that FGFR-2 is the preferred receptor for FGF4 under restricted HS conditions and that the bioavailability of structurally distinct HS motifs may differentially control receptor specificity of FGF4 in vivo.     

The proliferative and migratory activities of breast cancer cells can be differentially regulated by heparan sulfates

To explore how heparan sulfate (HS) controls the responsiveness of the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 to fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), we have exposed them to HS preparations known to have specificity for FGF-1 (HS glycosaminoglycan (HSGAG A)) or FGF-2 (HSGAGB). Proliferation assays confirmed that MCF-7 cells were highly responsive to FGF-2 complexed with GAGB, whereas migration assays indicated that FGF-1/HSGAGA combinations were stimulatory for the highly invasive MDA-MB-231 cells. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction for the levels of FGF receptor (FGFR) isoforms revealed that MCF-7 cells have greater levels of FGFR1 and that MDA-MB-231 cells have greater relative levels of FGFR2. Cross-linking demonstrated that FGF-2/HSGAGB primarily activated FGFR1, which in turn up-regulated the activity of mitogen-activated protein kinase; in contrast, FGF-1/HSGAGA led to the phosphorylation of equal proportions of both FGFR1 and FGFR2, which in turn led to the up-regulation of Src and p125(FAK). MDA-MB-231 cells were particularly responsive to vitronectin substrates in the presence of FGF-1/HSGAGA, and blocking antibodies established that they used the alpha(v)beta(3) integrin to bind to it. These results suggest that the clustering of particular FGFR configurations on breast cancer cells induced by different HS chains leads to distinct phenotypic behaviors.