Early detection of depression by primary care physicians.

The overall prevalence of depression is from 3.5% to 27%. The burden of suffering is high and includes death through suicide. In most cases treatment is effective, but important episodes of depression are being missed. To determine whether a brief, systematic assessment for the early detection of depression should be part of the periodic health examination we searched MEDLINE and the Science Citation Index for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of early detection of depression with a questionnaire. Seven instruments met our quality criteria; the Beck Depression Inventory, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, the Zung Self-Assessment Depression Scale, the General Health Questionnaire, the Hopkins Symptom Checklist, the Mental Health Inventory and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The four randomized controlled trials failed to provide adequate evidence of the benefit of routine screening. Early detection is difficult because of depression''s natural history, the role of symptoms, the cultural diversity of Canada and how detection instruments have been developed. Depression deserves careful attention from primary care physicians; however, further research and development is required before the widespread routine use of any detection test can be recommended.     

CHRONOS: a data base management package for physicians and researchers.

This paper describes a general data base management package defined for medical applications. CHRONOS is a user-oriented system which has been designed for physicians to get periodical reports and for researchers to prepare statistical treatments. The basic principles of the data base and program organization are described: many possibilities are offered for data acquisition and specific efforts have been made in order to analyze easily the evolution of patients. Several medical applications are now operational with CHRONOS in fields as different as psychiatry and nephrology.     

Effectiveness of a program to improve hypertension screening in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a program to improve hypertension screening practices in primary care. DESIGN: Retrospective quasi-experimental study. SETTING: Two hospital-based family medicine centres (FMCs). PATIENTS: In the study FMC, two study groups of randomly selected adult patients: 425 who visited the FMC before implementation of the screening improvement program (from Apr. 1, 1983, to Mar. 31, 1984) and 418 who visited it afterward (from Apr. 1, 1986, to Mar. 31, 1987). These patients were matched with 392 and 442 control patients respectively seen during the same time frames at the second FMC. INTERVENTIONS: Educational sessions for physicians to standardize blood pressure measurement and knowledge of the recommendations from the Canadian Hypertension Society on hypertension screening and diagnosis, and specific operational incentives to improve hypertension screening, including a reference guide placed in each physician''s office, a coloured form for recording blood pressure measurements placed in every patient''s chart and a follow-up and recall card file. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Frequency of blood pressure measurements recorded in patient charts. RESULTS: The hypertension screening rate was 60% per year in the study group before program implementation and 79% in the study group afterward; the corresponding rates in the two control groups were 72% and 59% (p < 0.0001). Patients were more likely to be screened if they visited the physician for a periodic health examination than for other problems (e.g., psychosocial or dermatologic) and if they had a scheduled appointment rather than no appointment. Physician characteristics that were positive predictors of screening were low age, female sex and payment on a salary basis. CONCLUSION: Physician education and incentives are effective in improving hypertension screening practices in hospital-based FMCs without incurring additional costs or other use of resources. Further evaluation of such a program should be undertaken in other primary care settings.     

Randomised controlled trial of computer assisted management of hypertension in primary care.

The hypothesis that general practitioners would obtain better outcomes for patients with hypertension using a computer than doctors not using a computer was tested. Sixty family physicians were randomised to two treatment strategies. "Test" physicians completed a data collection form after each visit from a patient with hypertension and mailed the forms to the test centre for processing. Computer feedback on management was mailed to the doctors. This encouraged doctors to apply the "stepped care" protocol, supplied charts of diastolic blood pressure v time, and ranked patients'' diastolic blood pressures by percentile. Letters were mailed to patients to remind them of appointments. "Control" doctors filled out the same data collection forms as test physicians, but neither doctors nor patients received computer feedback. Physicians who used the computer saw more patients per practice than control doctors (test 50 patients, control 40). For all patients the length of follow up was significantly longer in test practices (test 199 days, control 167), and a smaller percentage dropped out of active treatment in test practices (test 37.5%, control 42.1%). For patients with "moderate" hypertension of a baseline diastolic pressure of greater than 104 mm Hg the mean score of the last recorded pressure was below the goal of 90 mm Hg in test practices (88.5 mm Hg), but it failed to reach this goal in control practices (93.3 mm Hg). A greater average reduction of diastolic pressure was achieved in test practices (test 21.7 mm Hg, control 16.7 mm Hg). Though patients with "moderate" hypertension were better controlled in test practices than in control practices, the patients in test practices visited their doctors less often (test 13.3 visits per patient-year, control 17.4 visits). Among patients with newly detected hypertension test practices achieved a greater reduction in diastolic pressure than control practices (test 15.1 mm Hg v control 11.3 mm Hg) and more sustained control of hypertension (test 323 days per patient-year with a diastolic pressure of 90 mm Hg or less v control 259 days).     

Understanding the expanding role of primary care physicians (PCPs) to primary psychiatric care physicians (PPCPs): enhancing the assessment and treatment of psychiatric conditions

Aim In the current healthcare system primary care physicians (PCPs) have, in effect, become the primary psychiatric care physicians (PPCPs) for many of their patients. Being the PPCP in an already busy and stressful medical industry presents additional time management and treatment challenges to successfully manage patients' medical and psychiatric needs. The aim of the study was to ascertain PCPs' psychiatric assessment and treatment practices and to determine the extent to which PCPs have a need for using a structured psychiatric assessment tool.Method We sent 300 PCPs a survey to examine their psychiatric assessment and treatment practices. A one-page questionnaire was used to inquire about PCPs' psychiatric care practice habits including types of conditions treated, psychiatric medications prescribed, assessment methods used, interest in using a structured assessment tool and referral sources used. Sixty-eight usable surveys (23%) were returned.Results PCPs identify approximately one-third of their patients as mental health patients. They are treating a wide range of psychiatric conditions and prescribing a variety of psychiatric medications. The vast majority are using traditional clinical interviewing as their primary method of psychiatric assessment. However, the majority were willing to use a structured psychiatric assessment tool.Conclusion PCPs are serving a useful role in providing psychiatric treatment to many of their patients. Using a more structured psychiatric assessment method in practice could ultimately strengthen the assessment and treatment of psychiatric conditions in primary care settings.     

Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians in the management of elevated serum cholesterol levels.

We conducted a telephone survey of 102 randomly selected Ottawa family physicians to determine their attitudes and practices regarding the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Of the 102, 56% routinely measured serum cholesterol levels in all their patients over the age of 30 years, and 24% did so for patients in more restricted age ranges. The level at which they started dietary therapy averaged 6.95 mmol/L (270 mg/dl); for 25% it was less than 6.22 mmol/L (240 mg/dl). The level at which they started drug therapy averaged 8.9 mmol/L (345 mg/dl); for only 15% was it 7.23 mmol/L (280 mg/dl) or less. Two-thirds were unable to give numerical values to the serum cholesterol levels at which they started diet therapy, and 38% used the upper limits of laboratory normal values as an indication to start therapy. Our findings contrast markedly with results reported for US family physicians, who treat hypercholesterolemia much more aggressively. The variability in practices must be addressed if public campaigns to lower serum cholesterol levels are to be undertaken.     

Randomised trial of treatment of hypertension in elderly patients in primary care.

A randomised trial of the treatment of hypertension in 884 patients aged 60 to 79 years at the onset showed a reduction of 18/11 mm Hg in blood pressure over a mean follow up period of 4.4 years. The principal antihypertensive agents were atenolol and bendrofluazide. There was a reduction in the rate of fatal stroke in the treatment group to 30% of that in the control group (95% confidence interval 11-84%, p less than 0.025). The rate of all strokes (fatal and non-fatal) in the treatment group was 58% of that in the control group (95% confidence interval 35-96%, p less than 0.03). The incidence of myocardial infarction and total mortality was unaffected by treatment. Questionnaires completed by the patients and their relatives failed to identify any differences in symptoms that were likely to be due to treatment.     

When is a patient's use of primary care services unwarranted? Some answers from physicians.

To explore physicians'' perceptions of what constitutes unwarranted use of their services, examples of patient-initiated encounters considered unwarranted were contributed by physicians and categorized as requests for unnecessary services, inappropriately timed encounters or inconsiderate requests. A random sample of family and general practitioners in Ontario was surveyed with a questionnaire derived from these examples. Although there was no unanimity, examples of missed appointments, requests for further, unnecessary investigations, consultations or admissions to hospital, duplication of services, visits prompted by a desire to obtain free samples of over-the-counter drugs, some out-of-hours calls, and visits of healthy workers to obtain notes regarding fitness for work were seen as unwarranted by 70% or more of the respondents.     

Cancer screening practices among primary care physicians serving Chinese Americans in San Francisco

Previous research has reported a lack of regular cancer screening among Chinese Americans. The overall objectives of this study were to use a mail survey of primary care physicians who served Chinese Americans in San Francisco to investigate: a) the attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening and b) factors influencing the use of these cancer screening tests. The sampling frame for our mail survey consisted of: a) primary care physicians affiliated with the Chinese Community Health Plan and b) primary care physicians with a Chinese surname listed in the Yellow Pages of the 1995 San Francisco Telephone Directory. A 5-minute, self-administered questionnaire was developed and mailed to 80 physicians, and 51 primary care physicians completed the survey. A majority reported performing regular clinical breast examinations (84%) and teaching their patients to do self-breast examinations (84%). However, the rate of performing Pap smears was only 61% and the rate of ordering annual mammograms for patients aged 50 and older was 63%. The rates of ordering annual fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy at regular intervals of three to five years among patients aged 50 and older were 69% and 20%, respectively. Barriers (patient-specific, provider-specific, and practice logistics) to using cancer screening tests were identified. The data presented in this study provide a basis for developing interventions to increase performance of regular cancer screening among primary care physicians serving Chinese Americans. Cancer screening rates may be improved by targeting the barriers to screening identified among these physicians. Strategies to help physicians overcome these barriers are discussed.     

Guidelines for physicians reviewing proposed legislation on health care occupations

The premise of the CMA guidelines is that legislation on health care occupations should protect the public and therefore should be based on the needs of the patient rather than on the wishes of the health care worker. Health care should be provided by personnel with appropriate training; thus, the scope of practice of any group must be based on relevant educational preparation. In a review of legislation the procedure for amending both the statutes and the regulations should be examined.