Insights into the membrane proteome of rat liver peroxisomes: microsomal glutathione-S-transferase is shared by both subcellular compartments

Peroxisomes are ubiquitous "multipurpose" organelles of eukaryotic cells. Their matrix enzymes catalyze mainly catabolic and anabolic reactions of lipid metabolism, thus contributing to the regulation of lipid homeostasis. Since most metabolites must be actively transported across the peroxisomal membrane and since individual proteins and protein complexes play functional roles in such transport processes, we analyzed the peroxisomal membrane proteome. Benzyldimethyl-n-hexadecylammoniumchloride (16-BAC)/SDS-2-D-PAGE and mass spectrometry were used to characterize the proteomes of highly purified "light" and "heavy" peroxisomes of rat liver obtained by density gradient centrifugation. In both populations, the major integral membrane proteins could be detected in high concentrations, verifying 16-BAC/SDS-2-D-PAGE as a suitable tool for the preparation of membrane proteomes destined for mass spectrometric analysis. Both reliable and reproducible detection of a distinct set of microsomal (ER) membrane proteins, including microsomal glutathione-S-transferase (mGST), in light and heavy peroxisomal fractions was also possible. Compared with the abundance of most microsomal membrane proteins, we found mGST to be specifically enriched in peroxisomal membrane fractions. Furthermore, C terminus epitope-tagged mGST versions were localized at least in part to peroxisomes in different mammalian cell lines. Taken together, these data suggest that the peroxisomal GST is not a mere ER-contaminant, but a bona fide protein comprising the membrane proteome of both intracellular compartments. In addition, we could detect several mitochondrial proteins in light peroxisome fractions. This finding may likely indicate a physical association of light peroxisomes with mitochondria, since the organelles could be partly separated by mechanical stress. Whether this association is of functional importance awaits further investigation.     

Characterization of a novel component of the peroxisomal protein import apparatus using fluorescent peroxisomal proteins.

Fluorescent peroxisomal probes were developed by fusing green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the matrix peroxisomal targeting signals PTS1 and PTS2, as well as to an integral peroxisomal membrane protein (IPMP). These proteins were used to identify and characterize novel peroxisome assembly (pas) mutants in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Mutant cells lacking the PAS10 gene mislocalized both PTS1-GFP and PTS2-GFP to the cytoplasm but did incorporate IPMP-GFP into peroxisome membranes. Similar distributions were observed for endogenous peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins. While peroxisomes from translocation-competent pas mutants sediment in sucrose gradients at the density of normal peroxisomes, >98% of peroxisomes from pas10 cells migrated to a much lower density and had an extremely low ratio of matrix:membrane protein. These data indicate that Pas10p plays an important role in protein translocation across the peroxisome membrane. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that Pas10p is an integral protein of the peroxisome membrane. In addition, Pas10p contains a cytoplasmically-oriented C3HC4 zinc binding domain that is essential for its biological activity.     

Pex3 peroxisome biogenesis proteins function in peroxisome inheritance as class V myosin receptors

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, peroxisomal inheritance from mother cell to bud is conducted by the class V myosin motor, Myo2p. However, homologues of S. cerevisiae Myo2p peroxisomal receptor, Inp2p, are not readily identifiable outside the Saccharomycetaceae family. Here, we demonstrate an unexpected role for Pex3 proteins in peroxisome inheritance. Both Pex3p and Pex3Bp are peroxisomal integral membrane proteins that function as peroxisomal receptors for class V myosin through direct interaction with the myosin globular tail. In cells lacking Pex3Bp, peroxisomes are preferentially retained by the mother cell, whereas most peroxisomes gather and are transferred en masse to the bud in cells overexpressing Pex3Bp or Pex3p. Our results reveal an unprecedented role for members of the Pex3 protein family in peroxisome motility and inheritance in addition to their well-established role in peroxisome biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum. Our results point to a temporal link between peroxisome formation and inheritance and delineate a general mechanism of peroxisome inheritance in eukaryotic cells.     

Novel proteins, putative membrane transporters, and an integrated metabolic network are revealed by quantitative proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis cell culture peroxisomes

Peroxisomes play key roles in energy metabolism, cell signaling, and plant development. A better understanding of these important functions will be achieved with a more complete definition of the peroxisome proteome. The isolation of peroxisomes and their separation from mitochondria and other major membrane systems have been significant challenges in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) model system. In this study, we present new data on the Arabidopsis peroxisome proteome obtained using two new technical advances that have not previously been applied to studies of plant peroxisomes. First, we followed density gradient centrifugation with free-flow electrophoresis to improve the separation of peroxisomes from mitochondria. Second, we used quantitative proteomics to identify proteins enriched in the peroxisome fractions relative to mitochondrial fractions. We provide evidence for peroxisomal localization of 89 proteins, 36 of which have not previously been identified in other analyses of Arabidopsis peroxisomes. Chimeric green fluorescent protein constructs of 35 proteins have been used to confirm their localization in peroxisomes or to identify endoplasmic reticulum contaminants. The distribution of many of these peroxisomal proteins between soluble, membrane-associated, and integral membrane locations has also been determined. This core peroxisomal proteome from nonphotosynthetic cultured cells contains a proportion of proteins that cannot be predicted to be peroxisomal due to the lack of recognizable peroxisomal targeting sequence 1 (PTS1) or PTS2 signals. Proteins identified are likely to be components in peroxisome biogenesis, beta-oxidation for fatty acid degradation and hormone biosynthesis, photorespiration, and metabolite transport. A considerable number of the proteins found in peroxisomes have no known function, and potential roles of these proteins in peroxisomal metabolism are discussed. This is aided by a metabolic network analysis that reveals a tight integration of functions and highlights specific metabolite nodes that most probably represent entry and exit metabolites that could require transport across the peroxisomal membrane.     

PEX19 binds multiple peroxisomal membrane proteins, is predominantly cytoplasmic, and is required for peroxisome membrane synthesis

Peroxisomes are components of virtually all eukaryotic cells. While much is known about peroxisomal matrix protein import, our understanding of how peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs) are targeted and inserted into the peroxisome membrane is extremely limited. Here, we show that PEX19 binds a broad spectrum of PMPs, displays saturable PMP binding, and interacts with regions of PMPs required for their targeting to peroxisomes. Furthermore, mislocalization of PEX19 to the nucleus leads to nuclear accumulation of newly synthesized PMPs. At steady state, PEX19 is bimodally distributed between the cytoplasm and peroxisome, with most of the protein in the cytoplasm. We propose that PEX19 may bind newly synthesized PMPs and facilitate their insertion into the peroxisome membrane. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the loss of PEX19 results in degradation of PMPs and/or mislocalization of PMPs to the mitochondrion.     

Evaluation of the role of the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi transit in the biogenesis of peroxisomal membrane proteins in wild type and peroxisome biogenesis mutant CHO cells

Peroxisomes are thought to be formed by division of pre-existing peroxisomes after the import of newly synthesized proteins. However, it has been recently suggested that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) provides an alternative de novo mechanism for peroxisome biogenesis in some cells. To test a possible role of the ER-Golgi transit in peroxisome biogenesis in mammalian cells, we evaluated the biogenesis of three peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs): ALDRP (adrenoleukodystrophy related protein), PMP70 and Pex3p in CHO cells. We constructed chimeric genes encoding these PMPs and green fluorescent protein (GFP), and transiently transfected them to wild type and mutant CHO cells, in which normal peroxisomes were replaced by peroxisomal membrane ghosts. The expressed proteins were targeted to peroxisomes and peroxisomal ghosts correctly in the presence or absence of Brefeldin A (BFA), a drug known to block the ER-Golgi transit. Furthermore, low temperature did not disturb the targeting of Pex3p-GFP to peroxisomes. We also constructed two chimeric proteins of PMPs containing an ER retention signal "DEKKMP": GFP-ALDRP-DEKKMP and myc- Pex3p-DEKKMP. These proteins were mostly targeted to peroxisomes. No colocalization with an ER maker was found. These results suggest that the classical ER-Golgi pathway does not play a major role in the biogenesis of mammalian PMPs.     

Involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum in peroxisome formation

The traditional view holds that peroxisomes are autonomous organelles multiplying by growth and division. More recently, new observations have challenged this concept. Herein, we present evidence supporting the involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in peroxisome formation by electron microscopy, immunocytochemistry and three-dimensional image reconstruction of peroxisomes and associated compartments in mouse dendritic cells. We found the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p and the ATP-binding cassette transporter protein PMP70 present in specialized subdomains of the ER that were continuous with a peroxisomal reticulum from which mature peroxisomes arose. The matrix proteins catalase and thiolase were only detectable in the reticula and peroxisomes. Our results suggest the existence of a maturation pathway from the ER to peroxisomes and implicate the ER as a major source from which the peroxisomal membrane is derived.     

A dual function for Pex3p in peroxisome formation and inheritance

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex3p has been shown to act at the ER during de novo peroxisome formation. However, its steady state is at the peroxisomal membrane, where its role is debated. Here we show that Pex3p has a dual function: one in peroxisome formation and one in peroxisome segregation. We show that the peroxisome retention factor Inp1p interacts physically with Pex3p in vitro and in vivo, and split-GFP analysis shows that the site of interaction is the peroxisomal membrane. Furthermore, we have generated PEX3 alleles that support peroxisome formation but fail to support recruitment of Inp1p to peroxisomes, and as a consequence are affected in peroxisome segregation. We conclude that Pex3p functions as an anchor for Inp1p at the peroxisomal membrane, and that this function is independent of its role at the ER in peroxisome biogenesis.     

Targeting elements in the amino-terminal part direct the human 70-kDa peroxisomal integral membrane protein (PMP70) to peroxisomes.

Peroxisomes are multipurpose organelles present in nearly all eukaryotic cells. All peroxisomale matrix and membrane proteins are synthesized in the cytoplasm. While a clear picture of the basic targeting mechanisms for peroxisomal matrix proteins has emerged over the past years, the targeting processes for peroxisomal membrane proteins are poorly understood. The 70-kDa peroxisomal integral membrane protein (PMP70) is one of the proteins located in the human peroxisome membrane. PMP70 belongs to the family of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter proteins. It consists of six transmembrane domains and an ATP-binding fold in the cytosol. Here we describe that efficient peroxisomal targeting of human PMP70 depends on three targeting elements in the amino-terminal protein region, namely amino acids 61 to 80 located in the cytosol as well as the first and second transmembrane domains. Furthermore, peroxin 19 (PEX19) interactions are not required for targeting human PMP70 to peroxisomes. PEX19 does not specifically bind to the targeting elements of human PMP70.     

The membrane peroxin PEX3 induces peroxisome-ubiquitination-linked pexophagy

Peroxisomes are degraded by a selective type of autophagy known as pexophagy. Several different types of pexophagy have been reported in mammalian cells. However, the mechanisms underlying how peroxisomes are recognized by autophagy-related machinery remain elusive. PEX3 is a peroxisomal membrane protein (PMP) that functions in the import of PMPs into the peroxisomal membrane and has been shown to interact with pexophagic receptor proteins during pexophagy in yeast. Thus, PEX3 is important not only for peroxisome biogenesis, but also for peroxisome degradation. However, whether PEX3 is involved in the degradation of peroxisomes in mammalian cells is unclear. Here, we report that high levels of PEX3 expression induce pexophagy. In PEX3-loaded cells, peroxisomes are ubiquitinated, clustered, and degraded in lysosomes. Peroxisome targeting of PEX3 is essential for the initial step of this degradation pathway. The degradation of peroxisomes is inhibited by treatment with autophagy inhibitors or siRNA against NBR1, which encodes an autophagic receptor protein. These results indicate that ubiquitin- and NBR1-mediated pexophagy is induced by increased expression of PEX3 in mammalian cells. In addition, another autophagic receptor protein, SQSTM1/p62, is required only for the clustering of peroxisomes. Expression of a PEX3 mutant with substitution of all lysine and cysteine residues by arginine and alanine, respectively, also induces peroxisome ubiquitination and degradation, hence suggesting that ubiquitination of PEX3 is dispensable for pexophagy and an endogenous, unidentified peroxisomal protein is ubiquitinated on the peroxisomal membrane.     

Pex19p binds Pex30p and Pex32p at regions required for their peroxisomal localization but separate from their peroxisomal targeting signals

The assembly of proteins in the peroxisomal membrane is a multistep process requiring their recognition in the cytosol, targeting to and insertion into the peroxisomal membrane, and stabilization within the lipid bilayer. The peroxin Pex19p has been proposed to be either the receptor that recognizes and targets newly synthesized peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMP) to the peroxisome or a chaperone required for stabilization of PMPs at the peroxisomal membrane. Differentiating between these two roles for Pex19p could be achieved by determining whether the peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS) and the region of Pex19p binding of a PMP are the same or different. We addressed the role for Pex19p in the assembly of two PMPs, Pex30p and Pex32p, of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pex30p and Pex32p control peroxisome size and number but are dispensable for peroxisome formation. Systematic truncations from the carboxyl terminus, together with in-frame deletions of specific regions, have identified PTSs essential for targeting Pex30p and Pex32p to peroxisomes. Both Pex30p and Pex32p interact with Pex19p in regions that do not overlap with their PTSs. However, Pex19p is required for localizing Pex30p and Pex32p to peroxisomes, because mutations that disrupt the interaction of Pex19p with Pex30p and Pex32p lead to their mislocalization to a compartment other than peroxisomes. Mutants of Pex30p and Pex32p that localize to peroxisomes but produce cells exhibiting the peroxisomal phenotypes of cells lacking these proteins demonstrate that the regions in these proteins that control peroxisomal targeting and cell biological activity are separable. Together, our data show that the interaction of Pex19p with Pex30p and Pex32p is required for their roles in peroxisome biogenesis and are consistent with a chaperone role for Pex19p in stabilizing or maintaining membrane proteins in peroxisomes.     

Characterization of the targeting signal of the Arabidopsis 22-kD integral peroxisomal membrane protein

Using a combination of in vivo and in vitro assays, we characterized the sorting pathway and molecular targeting signal for the Arabidopsis 22-kD peroxisome membrane protein (PMP22), an integral component of the membrane of all peroxisomes in the mature plant. We show that nascent PMP22 is sorted directly from the cytosol to peroxisomes and that it is inserted into the peroxisomal boundary membrane with its N- and C-termini facing the cytosol. This direct sorting of PMP22 to peroxisomes contrasts with the indirect sorting reported previously for cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum) ascorbate peroxidase, an integral PMP that sorts to peroxisomes via a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, at least two different sorting pathways for PMPs exist in plant cells. At least four distinct regions within the N-terminal one-half of PMP22, including a positively charged domain present in most peroxisomal integral membrane-destined proteins, functions in a cooperative manner in efficient peroxisomal targeting and insertion. In addition, targeting with high fidelity to peroxisomes requires all four membrane-spanning domains in PMP22. Together, these results illustrate that the PMP22 membrane peroxisomal targeting signal is complex and that different elements within the signal may be responsible for mediating unique aspects of PMP22 biogenesis, including maintaining the solubility before membrane insertion, targeting to peroxisomes, and ensuring proper assembly in the peroxisomal boundary membrane.     

A subtle interplay between three Pex11 proteins shapes de novo formation and fission of peroxisomes

The organization of eukaryotic cells into membrane-bound compartments must be faithfully sustained for survival of the cell. A subtle equilibrium exists between the degradation and the proliferation of organelles. Commonly, proliferation is initiated by a membrane remodeling process. Here, we dissect the function of proteins driving organelle proliferation in the particular case of peroxisomes. These organelles are formed either through a growth and division process from existing peroxisomes or de novo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Among the proteins involved in the biogenesis of peroxisomes, peroxins, members of the Pex11 protein family participate in peroxisomal membrane alterations. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Pex11 family consists of three proteins, Pex11p, Pex25p and Pex27p. Here we demonstrate that yeast mutants lacking peroxisomes require the presence of Pex25p to regenerate this organelle de novo. We also provide evidence showing that Pex27p inhibits peroxisomal function and illustrate that Pex25p initiates elongation of the peroxisomal membrane. Our data establish that although structurally conserved each of the three Pex11 protein family members plays a distinct role. While ScPex11p promotes the proliferation of peroxisomes already present in the cell, ScPex25p initiates remodeling at the peroxisomal membrane and ScPex27p acts to counter this activity. In addition, we reveal that ScPex25p acts in concert with Pex3p in the initiation of de novo peroxisome biogenesis from the ER.     

Give what you can and keep what you need!

EMBO J 32 18, 2439–2453 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.170; published online July302013During cell division, peroxisomes are inherited to daughter cells but some are retained in the mother cells. Our knowledge on how peroxisome inheritance and retention is balanced and how this is regulated for each individual organelle remains incompletely understood. The new findings by Knoblach et al (2013) published in this issue of The EMBO Journal demonstrate that Inp1p functions as a bridging protein to connect ER-resident Pex3p and peroxisomal Pex3p, which anchors peroxisomes to the cortical ER for organelle retention in the mother cell. Asymmetric peroxisome division generates peroxisomes, which lack Inp1p but contain Inp2p instead, and only these peroxisomes are primed for myosin-driven transport to daughter cells.Peroxisomes are single membrane-bound organelles found in almost all eukaryotic cells. They harbour a wide spectrum of metabolic activities that vary among different species, developmental stages and cell types (Schlüter et al, 2010). Eukaryotic cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms to ensure the maintenance of peroxisomes. New peroxisomes can form either de novo by budding from the ER or by growth and division of pre-existing organelles (Lazarow and Fujiki, 1985; Hoepfner et al, 2005). Despite the fact that peroxisomes can form de novo, yeast favours to multiply peroxisomes by growth and division (Motley and Hettema, 2007). It therefore has to be ensured that both mother and daughter cells get their share of peroxisomes during cell division. Thus, some peroxisomes need to be retained in the mother cell, while other peroxisomes are directed for transport and inheritance to daughter cells. Both processes have to be balanced to ensure a successful distribution of the organelles between the mother cell and the newly formed bud.The molecular details of how an even peroxisome distribution of dividing cells are maintained have now been disclosed by Knoblach et al (2013), advancing an exciting scientific journey. This journey originally started by the finding that the partitioning of peroxisomes between mother cell and bud is dependent on actin filaments and the myosin motor protein Myo2p (Hoepfner et al, 2001). Inp1p and Inp2p were identified by the Rachubinski group and Inp2p turned out to function as the peroxisomal tether, which interacts with Myo2p and hooks the organelle onto the actin-track on the road to the bud (Fagarasanu et al, 2006). Inp1p was shown to be a peripheral peroxisomal membrane protein, which acts as a peroxisome-retention factor, tethering peroxisomes to putative anchoring structures within the mother cell and bud (Fagarasanu et al, 2005). Later on, Pex3p, a multi-functional protein of the peroxisomal life cycle, was identified as peroxisomal membrane anchor of Inp1p (Munck et al, 2009). Until now, it was therefore known that peroxisomes hook onto Inp1p by Pex3p and Inp1p connects peroxisomes to cortical structures of unknown nature. Thus, it was an open question how peroxisomes are trapped in the mother cell and which additional factors are required for this process.The work of Knoblach et al (2013) published in this issue of The EMBO Journal now unravelled this mystery, allowing for a more complete picture of the whole process of peroxisome retention and inheritance (Figure 1A). The authors show that peroxisomes are recruited to mitochondria that artificially expose Inp1p on their surface, clearly demonstrating that Inp1p acts as a peroxisome tether. Most importantly, they identified the mechanism of how peroxisomes are directed and anchored to the cell cortex: the ER acts as a membrane anchor for the retention of peroxisomes during cell division. In vitro binding assays revealed that Inp1p contains two independent binding sites for Pex3p, located at the C- and the N-terminal region of the protein, respectively. Since Pex3p exhibits a dual localization at the peroxisomal membrane and at the ER, Inp1p seems to bind to Pex3p of both compartments in vivo and thus link Pex3p molecules across two membranes. Indeed, it turned out that ER-located Pex3p recruits Inp1p to discrete foci in close proximity to the cortical ER. Using the split-GFP assay, the authors confirmed that Inp1p interacts not only with ER-bound Pex3p but also with Pex3p in the peroxisomal membrane. Thus, the core of the ER-peroxisome tether is generated by the Inp1p-mediated linkage of ER-bound Pex3p with peroxisomal Pex3p. The functional relevance of this ER-peroxisome tether is disclosed by the phenotype of peroxisome inheritance mutants. Accordingly, the Pex3p–V81E mutant, affected in the recruitment of Inp1p to the ER, is characterized by a defect of ER retention of peroxisomes, which drives all peroxisomes into the bud and leaves no peroxisomes in the mother cell (Figure 1B).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Peroxisome retention and inheritance (A) free peroxisomes in the mother cell (stage I) are anchored to cortical ER by a tethering complex consisting of two molecules Pex3p, one located at the ER and the other associated with the peroxisomal membrane and Inp1p, which connects the ER-bound and peroxisome-bound Pex3p (stage II). Accordingly, Inp1p contains two Pex3p-binding domains, allowing the protein to function as a bridge between the two Pex3p-containing organelles. Peroxisomes elongate and divide, and Inp2p is loaded onto peroxisomes with an asymmetric distribution (stage III). The peroxisomal population that lacks Inp2p is anchored to the cortical ER, whereas the population of cytosolic peroxisomes containing Inp2p is destined for the transport to the bud (stage IV). To this end, Inp2p interacts with Myo2p and thus triggers the movement of the peroxisome along actin cables to the bud. The process is completed when the peroxisome is released from Myo2p in the bud (stage I). In wild-type cells, the described retention and inheritance process leads to an equal distribution of peroxisomes between mother cell. The described molecular mechanism results in a regulated balance of retention and inheritance of peroxisomes, ensuring that both the mother cell and the newly formed bud gain their share of peroxisomes. (B) However, when the endogenous Pex3p is replaced by a Pex3p-mutant (Pex3p–V81E), which lost its strong binding capacity to Inp1p, peroxisomes are not anchored to the cortical ER anymore, with the consequence that during cells'' division the entire organelle population is transported to the bud and peroxisomes are not retained in the mother cell.To piece together the puzzle, a final gap had to be filled. How is the peroxisomal fraction remaining in the mother cell discriminated from those ferried to the bud during cell division? In budding wild-type cells, Inp1p exhibits a striking asymmetry along the cell division axis. Knoblach et al (2013) show that most peroxisomes of the mother cell contain Inp1p, while peroxisomes that are ferried towards the bud contain little or no Inp1p. Live-cell video microscopy of individual peroxisome revealed that Inp1p-containing peroxisomes were mostly immobile and retained in the mother cell, while highly mobile peroxisomes contained Inp2p and were predominantly found in the bud. The question remains of how peroxisomes lacking Inp1p but containing Inp2p are formed? To tackle this question, the authors took advantage of the fact that cells defective in peroxisome division contain single enlarged peroxisomes and project a tubular extension into the bud upon cell division (Kuravi et al, 2006). Remarkably, Knoblach et al (2013) show that Inp1p and Inp2p localized to opposite ends of the giant peroxisome. Inp1p was confined to the part of the peroxisome that was retained in the mother cell, while Inp2p enriched at the tubule that protruded into the bud.In summary, Knoblach et al (2013) discovered the ER as the site for peroxisome binding to the cell cortex that is responsible for the retention of peroxisomes in the mother cells during cell division and identified Inp1p as a molecular hinge connecting Pex3p of peroxisomal and ER membranes. Furthermore, peroxisome division is shown to result in an asymmetric distribution of inheritance factors with Inp1p-containing organelles remaining tethered to the ER in the mother cell, while Inp2p-containing peroxisomes hook onto myosin motor proteins for movement to the bud. These remarkable discoveries disclose the molecular mechanism of peroxisome retention and inheritance during cell division. Moreover, this study adds to other known functions of Pex3p, which besides its newly discovered role as ER-tether for peroxisomes is also known as an initiator of de novo formation of peroxisomes, a docking factor for the transport of peroxisomal membrane proteins and a tether for the regulated degradation of peroxisomes. This study adds more complexity to the network of regulated processes in peroxisome biogenesis that all merge at Pex3p, and will certainly provide the ground for further exploration.     

The ER-peroxisome connection in plants: development of the "ER semi-autonomous peroxisome maturation and replication" model for plant peroxisome biogenesis

The perceived role of the ER in the biogenesis of plant peroxisomes has evolved significantly from the original "ER vesiculation" model, which portrayed co-translational import of proteins into peroxisomes originating from the ER, to the "ER semi-autonomous peroxisome" model wherein membrane lipids and post-translationally acquired peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs) were derived from the ER. Results from more recent studies of various plant PMPs including ascorbate peroxidase, PEX10 and PEX16, as well as a viral replication protein, have since led to the formulation of a more elaborate "ER semi-autonomous peroxisome maturation and replication" model. Herein we review these results in the context of this newly proposed model and its predecessor models. We discuss also key distinct features of the new model pertaining to its central premise that the ER defines the semi-autonomous maturation (maintenance/assembly/differentiation) and duplication (division) features of specialized classes of pre-existing plant peroxisomes. This model also includes a novel peroxisome-to-ER retrograde sorting pathway that may serve as a constitutive protein retrieval/regulatory system. In addition, new plant peroxisomes are envisaged to arise primarily by duplication of the pre-existing peroxisomes that receive essential membrane components from the ER.     

The peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex prevents pexophagy and development of peroxisome biogenesis disorders

Peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) are metabolic disorders caused by the loss of peroxisomes. The majority of PBDs result from mutation in one of 3 genes that encode for the peroxisomal AAA ATPase complex (AAA-complex) required for cycling PEX5 for peroxisomal matrix protein import. Mutations in these genes are thought to result in a defect in peroxisome assembly by preventing the import of matrix proteins. However, we show here that loss of the AAA-complex does not prevent matrix protein import, but instead causes an upregulation of peroxisome degradation by macroautophagy, or pexophagy. The loss of AAA-complex function in cells results in the accumulation of ubiquitinated PEX5 on the peroxisomal membrane that signals pexophagy. Inhibiting autophagy by genetic or pharmacological approaches rescues peroxisome number, protein import and function. Our findings suggest that the peroxisomal AAA-complex is required for peroxisome quality control, whereas its absence results in the selective degradation of the peroxisome. Thus the loss of peroxisomes in PBD patients with mutations in their peroxisomal AAA-complex is a result of increased pexophagy. Our study also provides a framework for the development of novel therapeutic treatments for PBDs.     

Cloning and characterization of PAS5: a gene required for peroxisome biogenesis in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris

The biogenesis and maintenance of cellular organelles is of fundamental importance in all eukaryotic cells. One such organelle is the peroxisome. The establishment of a genetic system to study peroxisome biogenesis in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris has yielded many different complementation groups of peroxisomal assembly (pas) or peroxisome-deficient (per) mutants. Each appears to be deficient in functional peroxisomes. One of these mutants, pas5, has been characterized, complemented, and the gene sequenced. Ultrastructural studies show that normal peroxisomes are not present in pas5, but aberrant peroxisomal structures resembling "membranous ghosts" are frequently observed. The "peroxisome ghosts" appear to be induced and segregated to daughter cells normally. Biochemical fractionation analysis of organelles of the pas5 mutant reveals that peroxisomal matrix enzymes are induced normally but are found mostly in the cytosol. However, purification of peroxisome ghosts from the mutant shows that small amounts (< 5%) of matrix enzymes are imported. The PAS5 gene was cloned and found to encode a 127-kD protein, which contains a 200-amino acid-long region of homology with PAS1, NEM- sensitive factor (NSF), and other related ATPases. Weak homology to a yeast myosin was also observed. The gene is not essential for growth on glucose but is essential for growth on oleic acid and methanol. The role of PAS5 in peroxisome biogenesis is discussed.     

Peroxisomal protein import is conserved between yeast, plants, insects and mammals.

We have previously demonstrated that firefly luciferase can be imported into peroxisomes of both insect and mammalian cells. To determine whether the process of protein transport into the peroxisome is functionally similar in more widely divergent eukaryotes, the cDNA encoding firefly luciferase was expressed in both yeast and plant cells. Luciferase was translocated into peroxisomes in each type of organism. Experiments were also performed to determine whether a yeast peroxisomal protein could be transported to peroxisomes in mammalian cells. We observed that a C-terminal segment of the yeast (Candida boidinii) peroxisomal protein PMP20 could act as a peroxisomal targeting signal in mammalian cells. These results suggest that at least one mechanism of protein translocation into peroxisomes has been conserved throughout eukaryotic evolution.     

Peroxisomes exhibit compromised structure and matrix protein content in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus that has triggered global health and economic crises. Here we report the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on peroxisomes of human cell lines Huh-7 and SK-N-SH. Peroxisomes undergo dramatic changes in morphology in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. Rearrangement of peroxisomal membranes is followed by redistribution of peroxisomal matrix proteins to the cytosol, resulting in a dramatic decrease in the number of mature peroxisomes. The SARS-CoV-2 ORF14 protein was shown to interact physically with human PEX14, a peroxisomal membrane protein required for matrix protein import and peroxisome biogenesis. Given the important roles of peroxisomes in innate immunity, SARS-CoV-2 may directly target peroxisomes, resulting in loss of peroxisome structural integrity, matrix protein content and ability to function in antiviral signaling.     

The sorting signals for peroxisomal membrane-bound ascorbate peroxidase are within its C-terminal tail

Peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (APX) is a carboxyl tail-anchored, type II (N(cytosol)-C(matrix)) integral membrane protein that functions in the regeneration of NAD(+) in glyoxysomes of germinated oilseeds and protection of peroxisomes in other organisms from toxic H(2)O(2). Recently we showed that cottonseed peroxisomal APX was sorted post-translationally from the cytosol to peroxisomes via a novel reticular/circular membranous network that was interpreted to be a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), named peroxisomal ER (pER). Here we report on the molecular signals responsible for sorting peroxisomal APX. Deletions or site-specific substitutions of certain amino acid residues within the hydrophilic C-terminal-most eight-amino acid residues (includes a positively charged domain found in most peroxisomal integral membrane-destined proteins) abolished sorting of peroxisomal APX to peroxisomes via pER. However, the C-terminal tail was not sufficient for sorting chloramphenicol acetyltransferase to peroxisomes via pER, whereas the peptide plus most of the immediately adjacent 21-amino acid transmembrane domain (TMD) of peroxisomal APX was sufficient for sorting. Replacement of the peroxisomal APX TMD with an artificial TMD (devoid of putative sorting sequences) plus the peroxisomal APX C-terminal tail also sorted chloramphenicol acetyltransferase to peroxisomes via pER, indicating that the peroxisomal APX TMD does not possess essential sorting information. Instead, the TMD appears to confer the proper context required for the conserved positively charged domain to function within peroxisomal APX as an overlapping pER sorting signal and a membrane peroxisome targeting signal type 2.