Distinct Parasegmental and Imaginal Enhancers and the Establishment of the Expression Pattern of the Ubx Gene

The expression domain of the Ubx gene in Drosophila embryos is bounded by the product of the hb gene, acting as a repressor. We show that all Ubx fragments that bind Hb protein in vitro contain parasegmental enhancers active in the embryo in specific parasegmental patterns. We have found three new embryonic enhancer elements in the upstream region, in addition to the two previously identified. Each produces a pattern initially bounded at PS6 by Hb but sooner or later breaks down this boundary and begins to express in the anterior region. These enhancers do not respond to the long-term maintenance mediated by the Polycomb group of genes. They also cease functioning after germ band extension. Expression in imaginal tissues is due to a set of entirely separate and independent imaginal disc enhancers. These do not contain Hb binding sites and by themselves have no anterior/posterior positional information, although some distinguish between ventral and dorsal discs. A third kind of element, the Polycomb Response Element (PRE), has no enhancer activity but causes long-term maintenance of the expression domain of other enhancers present in the vicinity. The interaction of these elements results in the correct expression of Ubx in imaginal tissues.     

Anterior repression of a Drosophila stripe enhancer requires three position-specific mechanisms

The striped expression pattern of the pair-rule gene even skipped (eve) is established by five stripe-specific enhancers, each of which responds in a unique way to gradients of positional information in the early Drosophila embryo. The enhancer for eve stripe 2 (eve 2) is directly activated by the morphogens Bicoid (Bcd) and Hunchback (Hb). As these proteins are distributed throughout the anterior half of the embryo, formation of a single stripe requires that enhancer activation is prevented in all nuclei anterior to the stripe 2 position. The gap gene giant (gt) is involved in a repression mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, but genetic removal of gt (or deletion of Gt-binding sites) causes stripe expansion only in the anterior subregion that lies adjacent to the stripe border. We identify a well-conserved sequence repeat, (GTTT)(4), which is required for repression in a more anterior subregion. This site is bound specifically by Sloppy-paired 1 (Slp1), which is expressed in a gap gene-like anterior domain. Ectopic Slp1 activity is sufficient for repression of stripe 2 of the endogenous eve gene, but is not required, suggesting that it is redundant with other anterior factors. Further genetic analysis suggests that the (GTTT)(4)-mediated mechanism is independent of the Gt-mediated mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, and suggests that a third mechanism, downregulation of Bcd activity by Torso, prevents activation near the anterior tip. Thus, three distinct mechanisms are required for anterior repression of a single eve enhancer, each in a specific position. Ectopic Slp1 also represses eve stripes 1 and 3 to varying degrees, and the eve 1 and eve 3+7 enhancers each contain GTTT repeats similar to the site in the eve 2 enhancer. These results suggest a common mechanism for preventing anterior activation of three different eve enhancers.     

Comparative cis-regulatory analyses identify new elements of the mouse Hoxc8 early enhancer

The Hoxc8 early enhancer is a 200 bp region that controls the early phase of Hoxc8 expression during mouse embryonic development. This enhancer defines the domain of Hoxc8 expression in the neural tube and mesoderm of the posterior regions of the developing embryo. Five distinct cis-acting elements, A-E, were previously shown to govern early phase Hoxc8 expression. Significant divergence between mammalian and fish Hoxc8 early enhancer sequences and activities suggested additional cis-acting elements. Here we describe four additional cis-acting elements (F-I) within the 200 bp Hoxc8 early enhancer region identified by comparative regulatory analysis and transgene-mutation studies. These elements affect posterior neural tube and mesoderm expression of the reporter gene, either singly or in combination. Surprisingly, these new elements are missing from the zebrafish and Fugu Hoxc8 early enhancer sequences. Considering that fish enhancers direct robust reporter expression in transgenic mouse embryos, it is tempting to postulate that fish and mammalian Hoxc8 early enhancers utilize different sets of elements to direct Hoxc8 early expression. These observations reveal a remarkable plasticity in the Hoxc8 early enhancer, suggesting different modes of initiation and establishment of Hoxc8 expression in different species. We postulate that extensive restructuring and remodeling of Hox cis-regulatory regions occurring in different taxa lead to relatively different Hox expression patterns, which in turn may act as a driving force in generating diverse axial morphologies.