Strategies for breast cancer therapy with antiestrogens

Current clinical research is focused upon the application of adjuvant therapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Combination chemotherapy is the most successful adjuvant therapy for premenopausal patients whereas the antiestrogen tamoxifen (1 or 2 yr) is successful in postmenopausal disease. We have developed a unifying strategy for the treatment of breast cancer. The thesis is based upon the application of continuous adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen in a low estrogen environment. Chemotherapy causes a chemical castration in premenopausal patients. In contrast, tamoxifen causes an increase in steroidogenesis. A combination of both approaches will work against each other until ovarian failure occurs. Patients should be checked for castration to provide a low estrogen environment in which tamoxifen, a competitive antagonist of estrogen action, can effectively work. Laboratory evidence using carcinogen-induced rat mammary tumor models demonstrates the efficacy of long-term therapy. Studies with the human breast cell line MCF-7 grown in athymic mice show that tamoxifen is a tumoristatic agent so that once the therapy is stopped, tumors can be regrown by estrogen administration. Patients should receive continuous tamoxifen therapy to prevent the growth-stimulating effects of adrenal steroids, environmental and phyto-estrogens.     

Sensitivity and insensitivity of breast cancer to tamoxifen

Tamoxifen is the endocrine treatment of choice for breast cancer. In several laboratory models in vivo tamoxifen is a tumoristatic agent. When MCF-7 breast cancer cells are inoculated into athymic mice, palpable tumors do not grow unless the animals are treated with estrogen, and tamoxifen inhibits estrogen-stimulated growth. If tamoxifen is stopped, tumors regrow. These results suggest that adjuvant tamoxifen therapy should involve long treatment periods (even lifetime) to prevent tumor recurrence. Unfortunately resistance to therapy and patient relapse inevitably occur, and such disease recurrence involving tamoxifen resistance is difficult to treat successfully. A laboratory model of endocrine therapy failure has been developed. When athymic mice with MCF-7 tumors are treated for 6–8 months with tamoxifen, several tumors grew and continued to grow in tamoxifen-treated mice. These estrogen receptor-positive tumors grow with either tamoxifen or estradiol. Tamoxifen-stimulated tumor growth has been observed in human endometrial tumors implanted into athymic animals. Growth of these tamoxifen-stimulated tumors can be inhibited with the pure antiestrogen ICI 164,384 upon withdrawal of tamoxifen. These data are discussed in terms of treatment strategies for tamoxifen-failed patients.     

Signaling by estrogens and tamoxifen in the human endometrium

Tamoxifen is used as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The mechanism of action of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients is that tamoxifen inhibits growth of cancer cells by competitive antagonism for estrogens at the estrogen receptor (ER). In the endometrium, tamoxifen has an effect that varies with the ambient concentration of estrogen: in premenopausal women (high estrogen levels), tamoxifen displays an estrogen-antagonistic effect, while in postmenopausal women (low estrogen levels), tamoxifen displays an estrogen-agonistic mode of action. Here, using microarray technology we have compared estrogen signaling with tamoxifen signaling in the human endometrium. It was observed that on the one hand tamoxifen-treatment results in modulation of expression of specific genes (370 genes) and on the other hand tamoxifen-treatment results in modulation of a set of genes which are also regulated by estrogen treatment (142 genes). Upon focusing on regulation of proliferation, we found that tamoxifen-induced endometrial proliferation is largely accomplished by using the same set of genes as are regulated by estradiol. So, as far as regulation of proliferation goes, tamoxifen seems to act as estrogen agonist. Furthermore, tamoxifen-specific gene regulation may explain why tamoxifen-induced endometrial tumors behave more aggressively than sporadic endometrial tumors.     

Influence of tamoxifen, aminoglutethimide and goserelin on human plasma IGF-I levels in breast cancer patients

Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) was measured in breast cancer patients before and during treatment with tamoxifen, goserelin or aminoglutethimide. 24 out of 27 postmenopausal women treated with tamoxifen 20 or 30 mg daily experienced a decrease in plasma IGF-I levels (mean levels before treatment 14.8 nM, during treatment 10.2 nM, P < 0.001). In 8 out of 12 premenopausal breast cancer patients there was a reduction in plasma IGF-I during treatment with goserelin (mean levels before treatment 23.3 nM, during treatment 19.4 nM, P = 0.052). Contrary, 15 out of 17 postmenopausal women treated with the aromatase inhibitor aminoglutethimide had an increase in plasma IGF-I level (mean level before treatment 17.0 nM, during treatment 21.1 nM, P < 0.01). These preliminary results indicate that different forms of endocrine treatment of breast cancer may influence plasma IGF-I levels in different directions.     

Presurgical (neoadjuvant) endocrine therapy is a useful model to predict response and outcome to endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients

Endocrine therapy of breast cancer has been improved continuously during the last decades. Currently, aromatase inhibitors are dominating treatment algorithms for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer while tamoxifen still is the most widely used drug for premenopausal women. Several research tools and study designs have been used to challenge established drugs and develop the field of antihormonal therapy. One pivotal study option has been the observation of clinical responses during presurgical/neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (PSET/NET). This strategy has several major advantages. First, the breast tumor, still present in the patient's breast during therapy, can be followed by clinical observations and radiological measurements and any treatment effect will be immediately registered. Second, tumor biopsies may be obtained before initiation and following therapy allowing intra-patient comparisons. These tumor-biopsies may be used for the evaluation of intra-tumor changes associated with drug treatment. As examples, presurgical breast cancer trials have been used to evaluate intra-tumor estrogen levels during therapy with aromatase inhibitors and also to study mechanisms involved in the adaptation processes to estrogen suppression. Biomarker studies have provided information that may be used for patient selection in the future. Finally, recently published results from presurgical trials testing combinations of classical endocrine drugs and novel targeted therapies have produced promising results.     

Treatment of breast cancer with different antiprogestins: Preclinical and clinical studies

Treatment with antiprogestins in a new treatment modality for breast cancer. Previously, in rats with DMBA-induced mammary tumors we observed significant growth inhibitory effects of chronic treatment with the antiprogestin mifepristone (RU486). In addition, in 11 postmenopausal breast cancer patients, we observed one objective response, six instances of short-term stable disease, and four instances of progressive disease. Side-effects appeared mainly due to antiglucocorticoid properties of the drug. Increased plasma estradiol levels were observed which probably resulted from ovarian (rat) and adrenal (patients) steroidogenesis.

Combined treatment with an antiestrogen in the rat model caused additive growth inhibitory effects. Tumor inhibition after single treatment with mifepristone or tamoxifen was 90 and 75%, respectively. In contrast, when combined, tumor remission similar to that caused by LHRH-agonist treatment (50%) was observed. Even higher tumor remission was found after combined treatment with mifepristone plus LHRH-agonist (75%). In first studies in the rat model we observed significant tumor growth inhibitory effects with two new antiprogestins of seemingly greater potency which cause less unfavorable endocrine side-effects.

In conclusion: combined treatment (antiprogestin plus antiestrogen or LHRH-agonist) may be of value in endocrine therapy of breast cancer.     

Development and evolution of therapies targeted to the estrogen receptor for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

This article describes the origins and evolution of "antiestrogenic" medicines for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. Developing drugs that target the estrogen receptor (ER) either directly (tamoxifen) or indirectly (aromatase inhibitors) has improved the prognosis of breast cancer and significantly advanced healthcare. The development of the principles for treatment and the success of the concept, in practice, has become a model for molecular medicine and presaged the current testing of numerous targeted therapies for all forms of cancer. The translational research with tamoxifen to target the ER with the appropriate duration (5 years) of adjuvant therapy has contributed to the falling national death rates from breast cancer. Additionally, exploration of the endocrine pharmacology of tamoxifen and related nonsteroidal antiestrogen (e.g. keoxifene now known as raloxifene) resulted in the laboratory recognition of selective ER modulation and the translation of the concept to use raloxifene for the prevention of osteoporosis and breast cancer. However, the extensive evaluation of tamoxifen treatment revealed small but significant side effects such as endometrial cancer, blood clots and the development of acquired resistance. The solution was to develop drugs that targeted the aromatase enzyme specifically to prevent the conversion of androstenedione to estrone and subsequently estradiol. The successful translational research with the suicide inhibitor 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (known as formestane) pioneered the development of a range of oral aromatase inhibitors that are either suicide inhibitors (exemestane) or competitive inhibitors (letrozole and anastrozole) of the aromatase enzyme. Treatment with aromatase inhibitors is proving effective and is associated with reduction in the incidence of endometrial cancer and blood clots when compared with tamoxifen and there is also limited cross resistance so treatment can be sequential. Current clinical trials are addressing the value of aromatase inhibitors as chemopreventive agents for postmenopausal women.     

Comparative trial of endocrine versus cytotoxic treatment in advanced breast cancer.

Ninety-two women with advanced breast cancer were allocated at random to receive either cytotoxic or endocrine treatment. Out of 45 women included in the cytotoxic treatment group, 22 (49%) achieved complete or partial remission of their disease, whereas of the 47 included in the endocrine treatment group, only 10 (21%) achieved such remission. Significantly longer survival times in the cytotoxic treatment group were most apparent among premenopausal women, 75% of such patients responding to cytotoxic drugs (median survival 46 weeks) compared with only 11% benefiting from ovarian ablation (median survival 12 weeks). In postmenopausal women with predominantly soft-tissue disease, however, additive hormonal treatment with tamoxifen produced remission rates and survival times equivalent to those produced by cytotoxic drugs.     

Src Drives Growth of Antiestrogen Resistant Breast Cancer Cell Lines and Is a Marker for Reduced Benefit of Tamoxifen Treatment

The underlying mechanisms leading to antiestrogen resistance in estrogen-receptor α (ER)-positive breast cancer is still poorly understood. The aim of this study was therefore to identify biomarkers and novel treatments for antiestrogen resistant breast cancer. We performed a kinase inhibitor screen on antiestrogen responsive T47D breast cancer cells and T47D-derived tamoxifen and fulvestrant resistant cell lines. We found that dasatinib, a broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor, inhibited growth of the antiestrogen resistant cells compared to parental T47D cells. Furthermore western blot analysis showed increased expression and phosphorylation of Src in the resistant cells and that dasatinib inhibited phosphorylation of Src and also signaling via Akt and Erk in all cell lines. Immunoprecipitation revealed Src: ER complexes only in the parental T47D cells. In fulvestrant resistant cells, Src formed complexes with the Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor (HER)1 and HER2. Neither HER receptors nor ER were co-precipitated with Src in the tamoxifen resistant cell lines. Compared to treatment with dasatinib alone, combined treatment with dasatinib and fulvestrant had a stronger inhibitory effect on tamoxifen resistant cell growth, whereas dasatinib in combination with tamoxifen had no additive inhibitory effect on fulvestrant resistant growth. When performing immunohistochemical staining on 268 primary tumors from breast cancer patients who had received tamoxifen as first line endocrine treatment, we found that membrane expression of Src in the tumor cells was significant associated with reduced disease-free and overall survival. In conclusion, Src was identified as target for treatment of antiestrogen resistant T47D breast cancer cells. For tamoxifen resistant T47D cells, combined treatment with dasatinib and fulvestrant was superior to treatment with dasatinib alone. Src located at the membrane has potential as a new biomarker for reduced benefit of tamoxifen.     

Aromatase and its inhibitors

Inhibitors of aromatase (estrogen synthetase) have been developed as treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer. Both steroidal substrate analogs, type I inhibitors, which inactivate the enzyme and non-steroidal competitive reversible, type II inhibitors, are now available. 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA), the first selective aromatase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce serum estrogen concentrations and cause complete and partial responses in approximately 25% of patients with hormone responsive disease who have relapsed from previous endocrine treatment. Letrozole (CGS 20, 269) and anastrozole (ZN 1033) have been recently approved for treatment. Both suppress serum estrogen levels to the limit of assay detection. Letrozole has been shown to be significantly superior to megace in overall response rates and time to treatment failure, whereas anastrozole was found to improve survival in comparison to megace. Both were better tolerated than the latter. The potential of aromatase within the breast as a significant source of estrogen mediating tumor proliferation and which might determine the outcome of inhibitor treatment was explored. Using immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization, aromatase and mRNA_arom was detected mainly in the epithelial cells of the terminal ductal lobular units (TDLU) of the normal breast and also in breast tumor epithelial cells as well as some stromal cells. Increase in proliferation, measured by increased thymidine incorporation into DNA and by PCNA immunostaining in response to testosterone was observed in histocultures of breast cancer samples. This effect could be inhibited by 4-OHA and implies that intratumoral aromatase has functional significance. An intratumoral aromatase model in the ovariectomized nude mouse was developed which simulated the hormone responsive postmenopausal breast cancer patient. This model also allows evaluation of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens in tumors of estrogen receptor positive, human breast carcinoma cells transfected with the human aromatase gene. Thus, the cells synthesized estrogen which stimulated tumor formation. Both aromatase inhibitors and antiestrogens were effective in suppressing tumor growth in this model. However, letrozole was more effective than tamoxifen. When the aromatase inhibitors were combined with tamoxifen, tumor growth was suppressed to about the same extent as with the aromatase inhibitors alone. Thus, there was no additive or synergistic effects of combining tamoxifen with aromatase inhibitors. This suggests that sequential treatment with these agents is likely to be more beneficial to the patient in terms of longer response to treatment.     

Functional screen for genes responsible for tamoxifen resistance in human breast cancer cells

Antiestrogens, such as tamoxifen, are widely used for endocrine treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. However, as breast cancer progresses, development of tamoxifen resistance is inevitable. The mechanisms underlying this resistance are not well understood. To identify genes involved in tamoxifen resistance, we have developed a rapid screening method. To alter the tamoxifen-sensitive phenotype of human ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells into a tamoxifen-resistant phenotype, the cells were infected with retroviral cDNA libraries derived from human placenta, human brain, and mouse embryo. Subsequently, the cells were selected for proliferation in the presence of 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (OH-TAM) and integrated cDNAs were identified by sequence similarity searches. From 155 OH-TAM-resistant cell colonies, a total of 25 candidate genes were isolated. Seven of these genes were identified in multiple cell colonies and thus cause antiestrogen resistance. The epidermal growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta, colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor, neuregulin1, and fibroblast growth factor 17 that we have identified have been described as key regulators in the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Therefore, this pathway could be a valuable target in the treatment of patients with breast cancer resistant to endocrine treatment. In addition, the putative gene LOC400500, predicted by in silico analysis, was identified. We showed that ectopic expression of this gene, designated as breast cancer antiestrogen resistance 4 (BCAR4), caused OH-TAM resistance and anchorage-independent cell growth in ZR-75-1 cells and that the intact open reading frame was required for its function. We conclude that retroviral transfer of cDNA libraries into human breast cancer cells is an efficient method for identifying genes involved in tamoxifen resistance.     

The development, application and limitations of breast cancer cell lines to study tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor resistance

Estrogen plays important roles in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapies, such as the antiestrogen tamoxifen, antagonize the binding of estrogen to estrogen receptor (ER), whereas aromatase inhibitors (AIs) directly inhibit the production of estrogen. Understanding the mechanisms of endocrine resistance and the ways in which we may better treat these types of resistance has been aided by the development of cellular models for resistant breast cancers. In this review, we will discuss what is known thus far regarding both de novo and acquired resistance to tamoxifen or AIs. Our laboratory has generated a collection of AI- and tamoxifen-resistant cell lines in order to comprehensively study the individual types of resistance mechanisms. Through the use of microarray analysis, we have determined that our cell lines resistant to a particular AI (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane) or tamoxifen are distinct from each other, indicating that these mechanisms can be quite complex. Furthermore, we will describe two novel de novo AI-resistant cell lines that were generated from our laboratory. Initial characterization of these cells reveals that they are distinct from our acquired AI-resistant cell models. In addition, we will review potential therapies which may be useful for overcoming resistant breast cancers through studies using endocrine resistant cell lines. Finally, we will discuss the benefits and shortcomings of cell models. Together, the information presented in this review will provide us a better understanding of acquired and de novo resistance to tamoxifen and AI therapies, the use of appropriate cell models to better study these types of breast cancer, which are valuable for identifying novel treatments and strategies for overcoming both tamoxifen and AI-resistant breast cancers.     

Aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapies in patients with breast cancer

There is increasing evidence that endocrine therapy has an important role in patients with oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Several large meta-analyses have reinforced the value of both ovarian ablation and tamoxifen in improving survival. Over the past decade, aromatase inhibitors have become the treatment of choice for second-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer, and the third generation inhibitors have now an established reputation for good patient tolerability. Early studies indicated that aminoglutethimide/hydrocortisone could benefit postmenopausal patients with primary breast cancer, and in 2001, the ATAC study showed that the third generation aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, seemed superior to tamoxifen in that anastrozole-treated patients had a longer disease-free survival. Other studies will report on the relative merits of the steroidal inhibitor exemestane as well as non-steroidal letrozole. The exact duration and sequencing of treatment, together with the long-term effects on bone are at present, unknown.     

Progress in the prevention of breast cancer: concept to reality

In 1936, Professor Antoine Lacassagne suggested that breast cancer could be prevented by developing drugs to block estrogen action in the breast. Jensen discovered the physiologic target, the estrogen receptor, that regulates estrogen action in its target tissues and Lerner discovered the first nonsteroidal antiestrogen MER25. However, the success of tamoxifen as a treatment of breast cancer opened the door for the testing of the worth of tamoxifen to reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women. In 1998, Fisher showed that tamoxifen could reduce breast cancer incidence by 50%. Nevertheless, only half the women who develop breast cancer have risk factors other than age, so what can be done for women without risk factors? The recognition that nonsteroidal antiestrogens have the ability to modulate estrogen action selectively has advanced the design and development of new drug for multiple diseases. Tamoxifen and raloxifene maintain bone density and raloxifene is now used to prevent osteoporosis and is being tested as a preventive for coronary heart disease and breast cancer. The drug group is now known as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and the challenge is to design new agents for multiple applications. If the 20th century was the era of chemotherapy, the 21st century will be the era of chemoprevention.     

RSF1 and Not Cyclin D1 Gene Amplification May Predict Lack of Benefit from Adjuvant Tamoxifen in High-Risk Pre-Menopausal Women in the MA.12 Randomized Clinical Trial

Most women with estrogen receptor expressing breast cancers receiving anti-estrogens such as tamoxifen may not need or benefit from them. Besides the estrogen receptor, there are no predictive biomarkers to help select breast cancer patients for tamoxifen treatment. CCND1 (cyclin D1) gene amplification is a putative candidate tamoxifen predictive biomarker. The RSF1 (remodeling and spacing factor 1) gene is frequently co-amplified with CCND1 on chromosome 11q. We validated the predictive value of these biomarkers in the MA.12 randomized study of adjuvant tamoxifen vs. placebo in high-risk premenopausal early breast cancer. Premenopausal women with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer received standard adjuvant chemotherapy and then were randomized to tamoxifen (20 mg/day) or placebo for 5 yrs. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were evaluated. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization was performed on a tissue microarray of 495 breast tumors (74% of patients) to measure CCND1 and RSF1 copy number. A multivariate Cox model to obtain hazard ratios (HR) adjusting for clinico-pathologic factors was used to assess the effect of these biomarkers on Os and RFS. 672 women were followed for a median of 8.4 years. We were able to measure the DNA copy number of CCND1 in 442 patients and RSF1 in 413 patients. CCND1 gene amplification was observed in 8.7% and RSF1 in 6.8% of these patients, preferentially in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. No statistically significant interaction with treatment was observed for either CCND1 or RSF1 amplification, although patients with high RSF1 copy number did not show benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen (HR = 1.11, interaction p = 0.09). Unlike CCND1 amplification, RSF1 amplification may predict for outcome in high-risk premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.     

Concurrent or sequential use of cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormone treatment in advanced breast cancer: report of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research.

In a trial of combined hormone treatment and cytotoxic chemotherapy 464 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly allocated to either concurrent or sequential treatment. Cytotoxic drugs were given only if the antitumour activity of the hormone treatment was inadequate. Hormone treatment consisted of oophorectomy for premenopausal and tamoxifen administration for postmenopausal patients. Length of survival was better, though not significantly, in premenopausal patients (p = 0.29) treated concurrently and in postmenopausal women (p = 0.17) treated sequentially; the difference was highly significant (p = 0.003) only for postmenopausal women in the low-risk category. The findings suggest that postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer should probably be treated primarily by carefully monitored hormone treatment.     

Characterization of BCAR4, a novel oncogene causing endocrine resistance in human breast cancer cells

Resistance to the antiestrogen tamoxifen remains a major problem in the management of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Knowledge on the resistance mechanisms is needed to develop more effective therapies. Breast cancer antiestrogen resistance 4 (BCAR4) was identified in a functional screen for genes involved in tamoxifen resistance. BCAR4 is expressed in 27% of primary breast tumors. In patients treated with tamoxifen for metastized disease high BCAR4 mRNA levels are associated with reduced clinical benefit and progression-free survival. Regarding tumor aggressiveness high BCAR4 mRNA levels are associated with a shorter metastasis free survival and overall survival. In the present study, we investigated the role of BCAR4 in endocrine resistance. Forced expression of BCAR4 in human ZR-75-1 and MCF7 breast cancer cells resulted in cell proliferation in the absence of estrogen and in the presence of various antiestrogens. Inhibition of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) expression with small interfering RNA (siRNA), implied that the BCAR4-induced mechanism of resistance is independent of ESR1. Highly conserved BCAR4 homologues of rhesus monkey, green monkey, and the less conserved common marmoset gene induced tamoxifen-resistant cell proliferation, in contrast to the distant BCAR4 homologues of bovine and rabbit. Injection of BCAR4-expressing ZR-75-1 cells into nude mice resulted in rapidly growing tumors. In silico analysis showed that BCAR4 mRNA is highly expressed in human placenta and oocyte, and absent in other normal tissues. In conclusion, BCAR4 is a strong transforming gene causing estrogen-independent growth and antiestrogen resistance, and induces tumor formation in vivo. Due to its restricted expression, BCAR4 may be a good target for treating antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer.     

Heat shock 70 kDa protein 5/glucose-regulated protein 78 “AMP”ing up autophagy

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in women, with more than 240,000 new cases reported in the United States in 2011. Classification of breast cancer based upon hormone and growth factor receptor profiling shows that approximately 70% of all breast cancers express estrogen receptor-α. Thus, drugs that either block estrogen biosynthesis (aromatase inhibitors like Letrozole), or compete with estrogen for estrogen receptor (ER) binding (selective ER modulators including tamoxifen; TAM) and/or cause ER degradation (selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as fulvestrant), are among the most prescribed targeted therapeutics for breast cancer. However, overall clinical benefit from the use of these drugs is often limited by resistance; ER⁺ breast cancers either fail to respond to endocrine therapies initially (de novo resistance), or they respond and then lose sensitivity over time (acquired resistance). While several preclinical studies postulate how antiestrogen resistance occurs, for the most part, the molecular mechanism(s) of resistance is unknown.