The economic effects of an estrus synchronization protocol using prostaglandin in beef heifers

We estimated the effect of estrus synchronization on reproduction, production and economic outcomes in 272 beef heifers randomly allocated to a synchronized Test group or an unsynchronized Control group. The Test group received AI upon estrus detection for 6 days followed by PGF2 treatment of heifers that had not shown estrus by day 6 (PGF/6). In both groups AI was continued for 50 days, followed by a 42-day bull breeding period. Heifers were followed through their second breeding season and until they had weaned their first calves. Synchronization resulted in a reduction in median days to first insemination (8 vs. 11 in the Test and Control groups, respectively, P < 0.01) and median days to calving of calves born to AI (14 vs. 20, P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate to the AI period (60.0% vs. 51.8%, P = 0.18), final pregnancy rate (82.2% vs. 83.2%, P = 0.87) or pregnancy rate to the subsequent breeding season (96.0% vs. 95.0%, P = 1.00). Although mean calf weaning mass was not significantly different (207.0 kg vs. 201.4 kg, P = 0.32), the total mass of calves weaned in this study was 14,843 kg vs. 13,060 kg and the benefit: cost ratio for synchronization was 2.8. It was therefore concluded that a PGF/6 protocol may affect the total mass of calves weaned by changing days to calving, weaning rate, the ratio of male: female calves born and/or the birth mass of calves.     

The economic effects of an estrus synchronization protocol using prostaglandin in beef heifers

We estimated the effect of estrus synchronization on reproduction, production and economic outcomes in 272 beef heifers randomly allocated to a synchronized Test group or an unsynchronized Control group. The Test group received AI upon estrus detection for 6 days followed by PGF2 treatment of heifers that had not shown estrus by day 6 (PGF/6). In both groups AI was continued for 50 days, followed by a 42-day bull breeding period. Heifers were followed through their second breeding season and until they had weaned their first calves. Synchronization resulted in a reduction in median days to first insemination (8 vs. 11 in the Test and Control groups, respectively, P < 0.01) and median days to calving of calves born to AI (14 vs. 20, P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate to the AI period (60.0% vs. 51.8%, P = 0.18), final pregnancy rate (82.2% vs. 83.2%, P = 0.87) or pregnancy rate to the subsequent breeding season (96.0% vs. 95.0%, P = 1.00). Although mean calf weaning mass was not significantly different (207.0 kg vs. 201.4 kg, P = 0.32), the total mass of calves weaned in this study was 14,843 kg vs. 13,060 kg and the benefit: cost ratio for synchronization was 2.8. It was therefore concluded that a PGF/6 protocol may affect the total mass of calves weaned by changing days to calving, weaning rate, the ratio of male: female calves born and/or the birth mass of calves.     

Synchronization of estrus and fertility in zebu beef heifers treated with three estrus synchronization protocols

The effects on estrus and fertility of 3 estrus synchronization protocols were studied in Brahman beef heifers. In Treatment 1 (PGF protocol; n=234), heifers received 7.5 mg, i.m. prostianol on Day 0 and were inseminated after observed estrus until Day 5. Treatment 2 (10-d NOR protocol; n = 220) consisted of norgestomet (NOR; 3 mg, s.c. implant and 3 mg, i.m.) and estradiol valerate (5 mg, i.m.) treatment on Day -10, NOR implant removal and 400 IU, i.m. PMSG on Day 0, and AI after observed estrus through to Day 5. Treatment 3 (14-d NOR+PGF protocol; n = 168) constituted a NOR implant (3 mg, sc) on Day -14, NOR implant removal on Day 0, PGF on Day 16, and AI after observed estrus through to Day 21. All heifers were examined for return to estrus at the next cycle and inseminated after observed estrus. The heifers were then exposed to bulls for at least 21 d. During the period of estrus observation (5 d) after treatment, those heifers treated with the PGF protocol had a lower (P<0.01) rate of estrual response (58%) than heifers treated with the 10-d NOR (87%) or 14-d NOR+PGF (88%) protocol. Heifers treated with the 10-d NOR protocol displayed estrus earlier and had a closer synchrony of estrus than heifers treated with either the PGF or the 14-d NOR+PGF protocol. Heifers treated with the 14-d NOR+PGF protocol had higher (P<0.05) conception and calving rates (51 and 46%) to AI at the induced estrus than heifers treated with the PGF (45 and 27%) or the 10-d NOR (38 and 33%) protocol. Calving rate to 2 rounds of AI was greater (P<0.05) for heifers treated with the 14-d NOR-PGF (50%) protocol than heifers treated with the 10-d NOR (38%) but not the PGF (43%) protocol. Breeding season calving rates were similar among the 3 protocols. The results show that the 14-d NOR+PGF estrus synchronization protocol induced a high incidence of estrus with comparatively high fertility in Brahman heifers.     

The effect of estrus synchronization scheme, injection protocol and large ovarian follicle on response to superovulation in beef heifers

Two trials were conducted to examine the effects of estrus synchronization scheme, gonadotropin injection protocol and presence of a large ovarian follicle on response to superstimulation of follicular development and the ensuing superovulation. Estrus was synchronized with either a progestin compound (MGA) or by the use of a luteolytic agent (PGF). Superstimulation was induced with 280 mg equivalents of pFSH administered either by a single subcutaneous injection or by a series of 8 intramuscular injections over 4 d. Follicular development was followed for 5 d with real-time ultrasound, and the heifers were retrospectively classified as to the presence or absence of a large follicle (> or = 8 mm; morphologically dominant follicle) at the start of superstimulation. The 2 trials differed by season of the year and genetic origin of the heifers. In Trial I (20 heifers), the ovulation rate was influenced by the 3-way interaction of the synchronization scheme, injection protocol and morphologically dominant follicle (P = 0.05). The number of large follicles on Day 5 (Day 0 = day of start of superstimulation) and ovarian score (scale 1 to 5 based on extent of follicular development; 1 = least, 5 = most) on Day 5 were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with ovulation rate. In Trial II (20 heifers), the ovulation rate, number of embryos recovered, number of transferable embryos and ovarian weights were all greater (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01) with the 8-injection protocol than the 1-injection protocol. The number of medium follicles (5 to 7 mm) on Days 2 and 3, number of large follicles (> or = 8 mm) on Days 3, 4 and 5 and ovarian scores on Days 4 and 5 were all significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with ovulation rate. In both trials, differences in follicle populations were not seen until Day 3 of the superstimulation procedure. Collectively, these trials do not provide strong support for a single injection of FSH, as used here, nor does it indicate a clear advantage for either MGA or PGF as a means of enhancing the ovulation rate or embryo quality.     

Comparison of two MGA-PGF2alpha systems for synchronization of estrus in beef heifers

Yearling beef heifers (n = 193) were used to evaluate reproductive performance attained with 2 MGA-PGF(2)alpha synchronization systems. These treatments were compared with an untreated control group. The 14-d MGA heifers were synchronized by feeding 0.5 mg MGA/h/d for 14 d. At 17 d after the last MGA feeding, these heifers were injected with PGF(2)alpha (25 mg, im). Heifers in the 7-d MGA treatment group were fed 0.5 mg MGA/h/d for 7 d and received a 25-mg, im injection of PGF(2)alpha on the last day of the MGA feeding period. Heifers in all 3 treatment groups were observed for estrus every 12 h for 7 d beginning 24 h after the PGF(2)alpha injection. Heifers observed in estrus during this 7-d period were artificially inseminated approximately 12 h after the onset of estrus. The percentages of heifers in estrus during the 7-d synchronized period were 75.4, 56.3 and 17.2% for the 14-d MGA, 7-d MGA and control groups, respectively. The estrous responses were significantly different in each treatment. The percentage of heifers in estrus during the peak 24-h period was higher (P < 0.05) in heifers synchronized with the 14-d MGA system than in heifers synchronized with the 7-d MGA system (75.5 vs 50.0%). The synchronized conception rate of the 14-d MGA heifers was significantly higher (65.3%) than that of both the 7-d MGA (41.7%) and control (45.4%) heifers. Synchronized conception rates were similar (P = 0.79) in the 7-d MGA and control treatments. Synchronized pregnancy rates were 55.2, 32.4 and 15.2% for the 14-d MGA, 7-d MGA and control groups, respectively. Both synchronization treatments resulted in significantly higher synchronized pregnancy rates compared with that of the controls. The synchronized pregnancy rate was higher (P < 0.05) in the 14-d MGA group than it was in the 7-d MGA group. The mean day of conception within the breeding season was 11.5 and 9.3 d shorter in the 14-d MGA heifers than in the 7-d MGA and control heifers, respectively. Our results indicate that using the 14-d MGA system to synchronize estrus in beef heifers results in better reproductive performance than that attained in heifers synchronized with the 7-d MGA system or in control heifers.     

Comparison of timed insemination with insemination at estrus following synchronization of estrus with a MGA-prostaglandin system in beef heifers

Three trials utilizing 231 beef heifers were conducted in 1993 to determine if a timed insemination would result in similar synchronized pregnancy rates as insemination by estrus following synchronization of estrus using the 14-d MGA-prostaglandin system. All heifers were fed 0.5 mg MGA/h/d fof 14 d and given a 25 mg injection of PGF(2)alpha im 17 d after the final day of MGA feeding. Heifers in Group 1 (timed AI treatment) were inseminated at 72 h after the prostaglandin injection independent of whether or not they were observed in estrus. Heifers in Group 2 (AI by estrus) were inseminated 12 to 18 h after the onset of estrus. Since the trial was a significant source of variation for synchronized pregnancy rate, the effect of treatment on pregnancy rate was analyzed for each trial. Synchronized pregnancy rates in Trials 2 and 3 were similar in both treatment groups; 37 vs 35% and 61 vs 58% for the timed AI vs AI by estrus (Groups 1 and 2) in Trials 2 and 3, respectively. In both of these trials the degree of estrous synchrony was high. In Trial 1, the synchronized pregnancy rate in heifers that were time-inseminated was significantly lower than that of heifers that were inseminated by estrus (29 vs 57%). The lower synchronized pregnancy rate of Group 1 (timed AI) heifers in Trial 1 appeared to be due to the low degree of estrous synchrony in this trial. Our results indicate that using timed insemination with the 14-d MGA-prostaglandin system will give similar synchronized pregnancy rates as inseminating by estrus in groups of beef heifers where the degree of synchrony is high. However, in heifers where the degree of estrous synchrony is low, a timed insemination reduces synchronized pregnancy rates.     

Comparison of Melengestrol Acetate-Prostaglandin F(2)alpha to Syncro-Mate B for estrus synchronization in beef heifers

Three hundred and ten yearling heifers of various breeds were used in five trials to compare two estrus synchronization treatments. Treatment 1 consisted of Melengestrol Acetate-Prostaglandin F(2)alpha (MGA-PGF(2)alpha). Heifers were fed 0.5 mg MGA/head/d for 14 to 16 d. Sixteen or 17 d after the final MGA feeding, heifers were injected i.m. with 25 mg PGF(2)alpha. Treatment 2 consisted of Syncro-Mate B (SMB). Heifers were given a 9-d norgestomet implant plus an injection containing 3 mg norgestomet and 5 mg estradiol valerate i.m. at implant insertion. Heifers were observed for estrus at 6-h intervals for 120 h after the end of treatments and were artificially inseminated 12 to 18 h after observed estrus. Heifers synchronized with MGA-PGF(2)alpha and SMB had a similar (P > 0.10) estrous response (83.4 vs 90.2%) and a similar (P > 0.10) degree of synchrony (71.8 vs 79.0%) following treatment. However, the synchronized conception rate (68.7 vs 40.6%) and the synchronized pregnancy rate (57.3 vs 36.6%) were higher (P < 0.01) in MGA-PGF(2)alpha than SMB heifers. Breeding season pregnancy rates were similar in both treatment groups. Heifers in both groups that were classified as cycling prior to initiation of treatment had improved reproductive performance following synchronization compared with those classified as noncycling. Based on higher synchronized conception and pregnancy rates and lower labor requirements and drug costs, the MGA-PGF(2)alpha system appears to be a better method to synchronize estrus in beef heifers than the SMB system.     

Fixed-time insemination in peripuberal,lightweight replacement beef heifers after estrus synchronization with PGF2alpha and GnRH

Estrus synchronization contributes to optimizing the use of time, labor, and financial resources by shortening the calving season, in addition to increasing the uniformity of the calf crop. We determined whether acceptable pregnancy rates could be achieved after synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) in peripuberal replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and PGF2alpha. Crossbred heifers from two herds (MH, n=239; SS, n=330) were wintered at a single location. After a prebreeding examination revealed that 55 heifers had a reproductive tract score (RTS) of 1 (infantile reproductive tracts), they were culled and the remaining heifers were assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups: administration of 25mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Days -12 and 0 followed by estrus detection and insemination between 10 and 14 h after an observed estrus (Control; n=173); administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day -6, followed by 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 0, then fixed-time AI and administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day +2 (GPG; n=172); and, treatment as for group GPG in addition to administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day -12 (GGPG; n=169). Bulls were introduced 10 days after AI for 60 days to breed heifers which did not conceive after AI (clean-up bulls). On Days -12, -6, and 0 transrectal ultrasonography was used to monitor ovarian structures in a subset of heifers (30 per treatment). At 30-35 days after AI, ultrasound was used to determine the presence of a viable fetus. Presence of a fetus and stage of pregnancy were determined via palpation per rectum 61-63 days after the conclusion of the breeding season. Heifers in the MH herd (309+/-1.9 kg) were heavier (P<0.001) than those in the SS herd (283+/-1.7 kg) at initiation of the breeding season. Synchronized pregnancy rates were greater (P<0.05) in GGPG (25.4%) and GPG (22.1%) than Control (12.7%) heifers. Pregnancy rates were 9, 21, 32, or 31% for heifers with RTS of 2, 3, 4, or 5, respectively. The average diameter of 22 follicles induced to ovulate in heifers treated with GnRH (GPG and GGPG treatments) was 14.2+/-0.8 mm (range=10.0-23.6 mm). In conclusion, a fixed-time ovulation synchronization program using GnRH and PGF2alpha improved pregnancy rates in peripuberal, lightweight replacement beef heifers.     

Comparison of long-term CIDR-based protocols to synchronize estrus in beef heifers

Two experiments evaluated long-term controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus and compare differences in their potential ability to facilitate fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in beef heifers. In Experiment 1 estrous cycling heifers (n = 85) were assigned to one of two treatments by age and body weight (BW). Heifers with T1 received a CIDR from days 0 to 14, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on day 23, and prostaglandin F_2α (PG) on day 30. Heifers with T2 received a CIDR from days 2 to 16, GnRH on day 23, and PG on day 30. Ovaries were evaluated by ultrasonography on days 23 and 25 to determine ovulatory response to GnRH. In Experiment 2 heifers (n = 353) were assigned within reproductive tract scores by age and BW to one of four treatments. Heifers in T1 and T2 received the same treatments described in Experiment 1. Heifers in T3 and T4 received the same treatments as T1 and T2, respectively, minus the addition of GnRH. In Experiments 1 and 2, heifers were fitted with HeatWatch transmitters for estrous detection and AI was performed 12 h after estrus. In Experiment 1 heifers assigned to T1 had larger dominant follicles at GnRH compared to T2 (P < 0.01) but response to GnRH, estrous response after PG, mean interval to estrus, and variance for interval to estrus after PG did not differ (P > 0.10). AI conception and final pregnancy rate were similar (P > 0.50). In Experiment 2 estrous response after PG did not differ (P > 0.70). Differences in mean interval to estrus and variance for interval to estrus (P < 0.05) differed based on the three-way interaction of treatment length, GnRH, and estrous cyclicity status. AI conception and final pregnancy rates were similar (P > 0.10). In summary, the greater estrous response following PG and resulting AI conception and final pregnancy rates reported for heifers assigned to the two treatments in Experiment 1 and among the four treatments in Experiment 2 suggest that each of these long-term CIDR-based protocols was effective in synchronizing estrus in prepubertal and estrous cycling beef heifers. However, the three-way interaction involving treatment length, GnRH, and estrous cyclicity status in Experiment 2 clearly suggests that further evaluation of long-term CIDR-based protocols is required with and without the addition of GnRH and on the basis of estrous cyclicity status to determine the efficacy of these protocols for use in facilitating FTAI.     

Sources of sire-specific genetic variance for birth and weaning weight in Bruna dels Pirineus beef calves

This research investigated two sources of sire-specific genetic effects on the birth weight (BWT) and weaning weight (WWT) of Bruna dels Pirineus beef calves. More specifically, we focused on the influence of genes located in the non-autosomal region of the Y chromosome and the contribution of paternal imprinting. Our analyses were performed on 8130 BWT and 1245 WWT records from 12 and 2 purebred herds, respectively, they being collected between years 1986 and 2010. All animals included in the study were registered in the Yield Recording Scheme of the Bruna dels Pirineus breed. Both BWT and WWT were analyzed using a univariate linear animal model, and the relevance of paternal imprinting and Y chromosome-linked effects were checked by the deviance information criterion (DIC). In addition to sire-specific and direct genetic effects, our model accounted for random permanent effects (dam and herd-year-season) and three systematic sources of variation, that is, sex of the calf (male or female), age of the dam at calving (six levels) and birth type (single or twin). Both weight traits evidenced remarkable effects from the Y chromosome, whereas paternal imprinting was only revealed in WWT. Note that differences in DIC between the preferred model and the remaining ones exceed 39 000 and 2 800 000 DIC units for BWT and WWT, respectively. It is important to highlight that Y chromosome accounted for ∼2% and ∼6% of the total phenotypic variance for BWT and WWT, respectively, and paternal imprinting accounted for ∼13% of the phenotypic variance for WWT. These results revealed two relevant sources of sire-specific genetic variability with potential contributions to the current breeding scheme of the Bruna dels Pirineus beef cattle breed; moreover, these sire-specific effects could be included in other beef cattle breeding programs or, at least, they must be considered and appropriately analyzed.     

Synchronization of estrus after treatment with Luprostiol in beef cows and in beef and dairy heifers

Four trials were conducted to study synchronous estrous response in beef cows and in beef and dairy heifers to Luprostiol (13, thia-PG-F(2)alpha analog) in comparison with other prostaglandin products. In Trial 1, 60 virgin beef heifers were observed for estrus for 5 d and artificially inseminated. Heifers not observed in estrus within 5 d were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg Luprostiol or 25 mg Lutalyse. In Trial 2, 75 multiparous, lactating beef cows were randomly assigned to receive either 15 mg Luprostiol, 25 mg Lutalyse or 500 mcg Estrumate. All cows received a second injection of the respective treatment 11 d later. In Trial 3, 96 multiparous, lactating beef cows were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg Luprostiol or 25 mg Lutalyse. All cows received a second injection of the respective treatment 11 d later. In Trial 4, virgin dairy heifers were palpated per rectum. Seventy-seven heifers with a palpable corpus luteum (CL) were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg Luprostiol or 500 mcg Estrumate. In all trials animals were artificially inseminated 12 h following observed estrus. Estrous response during the 5-d synchronized period was 44% for Luprostiol and 42% for Lutalyse treated heifers in Trial 1. It was 52, 56 and 60%, respectively, for Luprostiol, Lutalyse and Estrumate treated cows in Trial 2; 23% for Luprostiol and 19% for Lutalyse treated cows in Trial 3; and 68% for Luprostiol and 70% for Estrumate treated heifers in Trial 4. Treatment with Luprostiol results in a similar synchronous estrous response as with the other prostaglandin products used in these studies.     

Synchronization of estrus in cyclic beef heifers with the prostaglandin analog alfaprostol

Seventy-eight Hereford-Angus crossbred heifers were injected intramuscularly twice with 6 mg of alfaprostol^b in 6 ml of propylene glycol. On each representative day of a 20-day estrous cycle (estrus = Day 0), either three or four heifers received their first injection. The second injection was given 12 days after the first, regardless of the response to the first injection. Thirty-nine heifers were not treated. The first alfaprostol injection reduced serum progesterone to less than 1 ng/ml in all heifers injected after Day 4. A total of 79.5% ($\text{62}\text{78}$) of the heifers exhibited estrus by five days after the first injection. Average interval from injection to estrus was 63 hours. The second injection occurred on Days 6 through 16 for all but one heifer, with 75.6% ($\text{59}\text{78}$) falling on Days 8 through 11 of the estrous cycle. Estrus was detected in 93.6% ($\text{73}\text{78}$) of the heifers within five days after the second injection, with an average interval to estrus of 66 hours.Day of cycle at second injection did not affect the interval to estrus. Conception occurred in 79.4% ($\text{58}\text{73}$) of the heifers inseminated in the five days after the second injection. Occurrence of estrus and conception was no different in treated heifers after five days of the insemination period than in nontreated heifers after 21 days of the insemination period, where 94.9% ($\text{37}\text{39}$) were observed in estrus and 83.8% ($\text{31}\text{37}$) conceived. Overall percent conception for a 55-day insemination period was 89.7 ($\text{70}\text{78}$) for treated and 87.2 ($\text{34}\text{39}$) for nontreated heifers. Day of cycle at first or second injection did not affect conception after the second injection. Some signs of estrus were observed in 11 of the 16 heifers injected before Day 5.A second trial to determine if alfaprostol induced luteolysis early in the cycle was conducted. Twenty purebred Angus, Hereford, or Simmental heifers received either one or two injections of alfaprostol on either Day 1, 2, 3, or 4. Only five heifers showed any signs of estrus, and the three that were inseminated did not conceive. Subsequent cycle length indicated that luteolysis occurred in only one heifer.Data suggest that alfaprostol is an effective luteolytic agent in cyclic beef heifers after Day 4 and that two injections 12 days apart will effectively synchronize estrus in heifers when distributed throughout the cycle at the first injection without affecting conception rate.     

Evaluation of a melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F(2)alpha system for the synchronization of estrus in beef heifers

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of feeding melengestrol acetate (MGA) for 14 days and administering prostaglandin F(2)alpha (PGF) 17 days after MGA to synchronize or induce estrus in yearling beef heifers. The study involved 56 Angus (n = 19), Hereford (n = 15) and Simmental (n = 22) heifers that were assigned by breed and pubertal status to either MGA+PGF or to control groups. Heifers in the synchronized group were fed 0.5 mg MGA per head per day for 14 days from a grain carrier and were injected with 25 mg, i.m. PGF 17 days after the last daily feeding of MGA. Control heifers were fed from a grain carrier without MGA and were not treated with PGF. Heifers were classified as pubertal when concentrations of progesterono in the serum exceeded 1 ng/ml in 1 of 2 samples collected prior to the initiation of treatments. Blood samples were collected 7 days before and on the day that treatment with MGA or carrier began and 7 days before and on the day that PGF was administered. Progesterone concentrations in the serum were elevated ( > 1 ng/ml) in 61% (17 28 ) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers and in 61% (17 28 ) of the control heifers prior to feeding MGA. However, concentrations of progesterone in the serum at the time PGF was administered differed (P<0.05) between MGA+PGF and control groups. Concentrations of progesterone in the serum exceeded 1 ng/ml in 100% (28 28 ) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers and in 71% (20 28 ) of control heifers at the time PGF was administered (P<0.05). All heifers were inseminated 12 hours after the first detected estrus. Twenty-two of 28 (79%) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 6 days after PGF compared with 9 of 28 (32%) of control heifers (P<0.05). The conception rate at first service did not differ between MGA+PGF and control groups (64% and 67%, respectively). Synchronized pregnancy rates were higher (P<0.05) for MGA+PGF-treated heifers than for control heifers (14 28 , 50% vs 6 28 , 21%). Increased concentrations of progesterone in serum at the time PGF was administered and higher pregnancy rates during the synchronized period among MGA+PGF-treated heifers demonstrate the efficacy of this treatment for use in estrus synchronization. Moreover, this treatment may have a potential effect on inducing puberty in breeding age heifers.     

Single appointment insemination for heifers after prostaglandin or progestin synchronization of estrus

Pregnancy rates to a single appointment insemination were compared in seven groups of beef or dairy heifers following estrus synchronization with the prostaglandin F(2a) product, cloprostenol, versus the progestín product, Syncro-Mate-B. For cloprostenol synchronization, two injections of cloprostenol were given 11 d apart, with insemination occurring at 61+/-1 h after the second injection. The Syncro-Mate-B treatment consisted of a norgestomet/estradiol injection and a norgestomet implant on Day 0, followed by insemination at 49+/-1 h after implant removal on Day 9. Treatments were coordinated so all heifers in each group were housed together at the time of and for 48 h before a common insemination time so that the treatment received by individual heifers was not known. Overall pregnancy rates did not differ between treatment groups: 42% for 111 heifers treated with cloprostenol and 38% for 108 heifers treated with Syncro-Mate-B. Four blood samples per heifer taken during each replicate showed that two groups (n = 67) had many noncyclic heifers, while five groups (n = 152) had very few. Differences in pregnancy rates between these categories existed for both estrus synchronization methods, 18 versus 53% for cloprostenol and 21 versus 45% for Syncro-Mate-B. Thus the two methods were equally effective for cyclic heifers and equally ineffective for noncyclic heifers.     

Induction of follicular wave emergence for estrus synchronization and artificial insemination in heifers

The objective was to synchronize follicular wave emergence among cattle for synchronization of estrus and ovulation, and to determine pregnancy rate after AI at observed estrus. At random stages of the estrous cycle, a controlled internal drug release device (CIDR-B) was inserted intravaginally (Day 0) in 67 cross-bred beef heifers, and they were randomly allocated to receive either no further treatment (Control; n = 18); 5 mg of estradiol-17beta and 100 mg of progesterone im (E/P; n = 16); 100 microg im of GnRH (GnRH; n = 16); or transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular ablation of all follicles > or = 5 mm (FA; n = 17). All heifers received a luteolytic dose of PGF (repeated 12 h later), and CIDR-B were removed on Days 9, 8, 6 or 5, in Control, E/P, GnRH or FA groups, respectively, so the dominant follicle of the induced wave was exposed to exogenous progesterone for a similar period of time in each group. Mean (+/- SEM) intervals (and range, in days) from treatment to follicular wave emergence in these groups were 3.5 +/- 0.6 (-2 to 8), 3.4 +/- 0.1 (3 to 4), 1.5 +/- 0.3 (-1 to 4), and 1.0 +/- 0.1 (0 to 2), respectively. Although the interval was longest (P<0.01) in the E/P and Control groups, it was least variable (P<0.01) in the E/P and FA groups. Intervals (and range, in days) from CIDR-B removal (and first PGF treatment) to estrus were 2.3 +/- 0.2 (1.5 to 4.5), 2.2 +/- 0.2 (1.5 to 3.0), 2.1 +/- 0.1,(1.5 to 3.5), and 2.5 +/- 0.1 (2.0 to 3.5), and to ovulation were 3.5 +/- 0.2 (2.5 to 5.5), 3.4 +/- 0.1 (3.0 to 4.5), 3.5 +/- 0.1 (2.5 to 4.5), and 3.8 +/- 0.1 (3.0 to 4.5), for Control, E/P, GnRH and FA groups, respectively (ns). The proportion of heifers displaying estrus was higher in the Control than in the FA group (94% versus 65%, P<0.05) and intermediate in EP and GnRH groups (87% and 75%). Heifers were inseminated approximately 12 h prior to ovulation (based on estrous behavior and ultrasound examinations). Pregnancy rates were 78%, 80%, 69% and 65% for Control, E/P, GnRH and FA groups, respectively (P=0.73). Results support the hypothesis that synchronous follicular wave emergence results in synchronous follicle development and, following progesterone removal, synchronous estrus and ovulation with high pregnancy rates to AI. The synchrony of estrus and ovulation in the E/P, GnRH and FA groups suggest that these treatments, in combination with CIDR-B, could be adapted to fixed-time insemination programs.     

Short synchronization system for estrus cycles in dairy heifers: a preliminary report

In previous studies we demonstrated that the administration of a luteolytic dose of cloprostenol to dairy cows in luteal phase, followed by hCG plus estradiol benzoate (EB) 12 h later, led to successful timed AI 48 h after the initiation of treatment. This article reports two consecutive studies. In Study 1 we determined the pregnancy rate of dairy heifers in luteal phase (established by palpation per rectum) treated with cloprostenol followed by 250 IU of hCG plus 1 mg of EB 12 h later, and inseminated 48 h after cloprostenol injection. Study 2 was designed to evaluate the efficiency this synchronization protocol, irrespective of the estrus stage of the animals. In Study 1, 1272 Friesian heifers aged 14 to 16 months with a palpable corpus luteum received 500 mcg cloprostenol. Heifers were then synchronized either according to the hCG plus EB protocol (hCG-EB, n=637), or by a second dose of cloprostenol 11 d later (PG, n=636). Animals in this last group served as controls and were inseminated 72 and 96 h after the second cloprostenol injection. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P<0.0001) in the hCG-EB group (59.5%, 379/637) than in PG (44.8%, 285/636). In Study 2, 135 contemporary heifers (with no corresponding information on estrus stage) were subjected to the same protocol as those in the hCG-EB group of Study 1. These animals were classified in retrospect according to estrus stage established by plasma progesterone concentration. Pregnancy rates were 66.7% (24/36), 51% (25/49) and 58% (29/50) for animals in the follicular, early/late luteal, and mid-luteal phase, respectively. The total pregnancy rate was 57.8% (78/135). These findings indicate an improved pregnancy rate for heifers subjected to single insemination after cloprostenol/hCG/EB synchronization, compared to double insemination after synchronization by 2 cloprostenol injections 11 d apart. The cloprostenol/hCG/EB protocol did result in acceptable pregnancy rates after timed AI of dairy heifers regardless of their estrus cycle phase.     

Minimising the stress of weaning of beef calves: a review

Weaning of beef calves is usually done abruptly and early compared to the natural weaning of the species, and is associated with simultaneous exposure of calves to a range of social and environmental stressors. Behavioural and physiological responses to weaning indicate detrimental effects on the welfare of these animals. The development and assessment of weaning methods aiming at reducing or avoiding this problem must be supported by scientific knowledge of the morphological, physiological and psychological mechanisms involved in the establishment, maintenance and braking of the cow-calf bond. Solutions also depend on the understanding of the various stressors associated with weaning, among which are the change in diet, cessation of nursing, separation from the dam, the change to a new spatial environment and the need for social reorganization following removal of the adults from the group. This review discusses these issues and assesses the effectiveness of the methods so far proposed for improving the welfare of beef calves during the weaning period.     

The effect of partial weaning on the rebreeding performance of primiparous Hereford heifers

One or two 6–7 or 9–10 day old blastocysts were transferred to 39 pure-bred or cross-bred Charolais heifer recipients.The embryos were collected after slaughter of the donors. An insemination catheter (Cassou gun) was used to transfer the blastocysts through the cervix into the uterus. Placement was approximately 5cm beyond the body of the uterus.Pregnancy was determined by slaughter of the recipients on the 45th day of gestation. Nineteen of the 39 recipients were pregnant. The survival rate of embryos transferred was as follows: 6–7 day old embryos: 7 out of 23 (30.4%); 9–10 day old embryos: 18 out of 36 (50%). All embryos: 25 out of 59 (42.3%). The difference between the 6–7 day old embryos and the 9–10 day old embryos was not significant. Twelve of the 20 recipients receiving a bilateral transfer were pregnant, and 6 were carrying twins. This is a satisfactory technique for use in field conditions for the transfer of bovine blastocysts.     

Luteolytic effect of oestrone sulphate on cyclic beef heifers

The action of oestrone sulphate on luteal function was tested in cyclic beef heifers. Once daily injection of 28 or 56 mg oestrone sulphate in corn oil beginning on Day 10 of the cycle had a significant luteolytic effect as compared to corn oil-treated controls.