Complex formed by complementary RNA stem-loops and its stabilization by a protein: function of CoIE1 Rom protein.

A small plasmid-specified RNA (RNA I) inhibits formation of the RNA primer for CoIE1 DNA replication by binding to its precursor (RNA II). Binding is modulated by the plasmid-specified Rom protein. Both in the presence and absence of Rom, binding starts with interaction between loops of RNAs. To understand the mechanism of binding, we examined the interactions of pairs of single stem-loops that are complementary fragments of RNA I and RNA II. We found that these complementary single stem-loops bind to each other at their loops, forming an RNAase V1-sensitive structure. Rom protects the complex from cleavage and from alkylation of phosphate groups by ethyinitrosourea. A single dimer of Rom binds to the complex by recognizing the structure rather than its exact nucleotide sequence. Rom enhances complex formation by decreasing the rate of dissociation of the complex. Structures of RNA complexes formed in the presence and absence of Rom are proposed.     

Control of ColE1 plasmid replication. Intermediates in the binding of RNA I and RNA II.

Replication of plasmid ColE1 is regulated by a plasmid-specified small RNA (RNA I). RNA I binds to the precursor (RNA II) of the primer for DNA synthesis and inhibits primer formation. The process of binding of RNA I to RNA II that results in formation of a stably bound complex consists of a series of reactions forming complexes differing in the stability. Formation of a very unstable early intermediate that was previously inferred from the inhibition of stable binding caused by a second RNA I species was firmly established by more extensive studies. This complex is converted to a more stable yet reversible complex that was identified by its RNase sensitivity, which was altered from that of the earlier complex or from that of free RNA I or RNA II. In these complexes, most loops of RNA II interact with their complementary loops of RNA I. The kinetic and structural analyses of the binding process predict formation of a complex interacting at a single pair of complementary loops that precedes formation of these complexes. Thus the process of binding of RNA I to RNA II is seen to consist of a sequence of reactions producing a series of progressively more stable intermediates leading to the final product.     

High copy number of the pUC plasmid results from a Rom/Rop-suppressible point mutation in RNA II

The plasmids pUC18 and pUC19 are pBR322 derivatives that replicate at a copy number several fold higher than the parent during growth of Escherichia coli at 37 degrees C. We show here that the high copy number of pUC plasmids results from a single point mutation in the replication primer, RNA II, and that the phenotypic effects of this mutation can be suppressed by the Rom (RNA one modulator)/Rop protein or by lowering the growth temperature to 30 degrees C. The mutation's effects are enhanced by cell growth at 42 degrees C, at which copy number is further increased. During normal cell growth, the pUC mutation does not affect the length or function of RNA I, the antisense repressor of plasmid DNA replication, but may, as computer analysis suggests, alter the secondary structure of pUC RNA II. We suggest that the pUC mutation impedes interactions between the repressor and the primer by producing a temperature-dependent alteration of the RNA II conformation. The Rom/Rop protein may either promote normal folding of the mutated RNA II or, alternatively, may enable the interaction of sub-optimally folded RNA II with the repressor.     

Proteolytic removal of the COOH terminus of the T4 gene 32 helix-destabilizing protein alters the T4 in vitro replication complex

The proteolytic removal of about 60 amino acids from the COOH terminus of the bacteriophage T4 helix-destabilizing protein (gene 32 protein) produces 32*I, a 27,000-dalton fragment which still binds tightly and cooperatively to single-stranded DNA. The substitution of 32*I protein for intact 32 protein in the seven-protein T4 replication complex results in dramatic changes in some of the reactions catalyzed by this in vitro DNA replication system, while leaving others largely unperturbed. 1. Like intact 32 protein, the 32*I protein promotes DNA synthesis by the DNA polymerase when the T4 polymerase accessory proteins (gene 44/62 and 45 proteins) are also present. The host helix-destabilizing protein (Escherichia coli ssb protein) cannot replace the 32I protein for this synthesis. 2. Unlike intact 32 protein, 32*I protein strongly inhibits DNA synthesis catalyzed by the T4 DNA polymerase alone on a primed single-stranded DNA template. 3. Unlike intact 32 protein, the 32*I protein strongly inhibits RNA primer synthesis catalyzed by the T4 gene 41 and 61 proteins and also reduces the efficiency of RNA primer utilization. As a result, de novo DNA chain starts are blocked completely in the complete T4 replication system, and no lagging strand DNA synthesis occurs. 4. The 32*I protein does not bind to either the T4 DNA polymerase or to the T4 gene 61 protein in the absence of DNA; these associations (detected with intact 32 protein) would therefore appear to be essential for the normal control of 32 protein activity, and to account at least in part for observations 2 and 3, above. We propose that the COOH-terminal domain of intact 32 protein functions to guide its interactions with the T4 DNA polymerase and the T4 gene 61 RNA-priming protein. When this domain is removed, as in 32*I protein, the helix destabilization induced by the protein is controlled inadequately, so that polymerizing enzymes tend to be displaced from the growing 3'-OH end of a polynucleotide chain and are thereby inhibited. Eukaryotic helix-destabilizing proteins may also have similar functional domains essential for the control of their activities.