The mother-bud neck as a signaling platform for the coordination between spindle position and cytokinesis in budding yeast

During asymmetric cell division, spindle positioning is critical for ensuring the unequal inheritance of polarity factors. In budding yeast, the mother-bud neck determines the cleavage plane and a correct nuclear division between mother and daughter cell requires orientation of the mitotic spindle along the mother-bud axis. A surveillance device called the spindle position/orientation checkpoint (SPOC) oversees this process and delays mitotic exit and cytokinesis until the spindle is properly oriented along the division axis, thus ensuring genome stability. Cytoskeletal proteins called septins form a ring at the bud neck that is essential for cytokinesis. Furthermore, septins and septin-associated proteins are implicated in spindle positioning and SPOC. In this review, we discuss the emerging connections between septins and the SPOC and the role of the mother-bud neck as a signaling platform to couple proper chromosome segregation to cytokinesis.     

Interphase microtubules determine the initial alignment of the mitotic spindle

In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, interphase microtubules (MTs) position the nucleus [1, 2], which in turn positions the cell-division plane [1, 3]. It is unclear how the spindle orients, with respect to the predetermined division plane, to ensure that the chromosomes are segregated across this plane. It has been proposed that, during prometaphase, the astral MT interaction with the cell cortex aligns the spindle with the cell axis [4] and also participates in a spindle orientation checkpoint (SOC), which delays entry into anaphase as long as the spindle is misaligned [5-7]. Here, we trace the position of the spindle throughout mitosis in a single-cell assay. We find no evidence for the SOC. We show that the spindle is remarkably well aligned with the cell longitudinal axis at the onset of mitosis, by growing along the axis of the adjacent interphase MT. Misalignment of nascent spindles can give rise to anucleate cells when spindle elongation is impaired. We propose a new role for interphase microtubules: through interaction with the spindle pole body, interphase microtubules determine the initial alignment of the spindle in the subsequent cell division.     

Chromosome- and spindle-pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation

Mitotic spindle positioning by cortical pulling forces defines the cell division axis and location, which is critical for proper cell division and development. Although recent work has identified developmental and extrinsic cues that regulate spindle orientation, the contribution of intrinsic signals to spindle positioning and orientation remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that cortical force generation in human cells is controlled by distinct spindle-pole- and chromosome-derived signals that regulate cytoplasmic dynein localization. First, dynein exhibits a dynamic asymmetric cortical localization that is negatively regulated by spindle-pole proximity, resulting in spindle oscillations to centre the spindle within the cell. We find that this signal comprises the spindle-pole-localized polo-like kinase (Plk1), which regulates dynein localization by controlling the interaction between dynein-dynactin and its upstream cortical targeting factors NuMA and LGN. Second, a chromosome-derived RanGTP gradient restricts the localization of NuMA-LGN to the lateral cell cortex to define and maintain the spindle orientation axis. RanGTP acts in part through the nuclear localization sequence of NuMA to locally alter the ability of NuMA-LGN to associate with the cell cortex in the vicinity of chromosomes. We propose that these chromosome- and spindle-pole-derived gradients generate an intrinsic code to control spindle position and orientation.     

The relation between cell size,chromosome length and the orientation of chromosomes in dividing root cortex cells

Cells in the root meristem are organised in longitudinal files. Repeated transverse cell divisions in these files are the prime cause of root growth. Because of the orientation of the cell divisions, we expected to find mitoses with an spindle axis parallel to the file axis. However, we observed in the root cortex ofVicia faba large number of oblique chromosome orientations. From metaphase to telophase there was a dramatic increase of the rotation of the spindle axis. Measurements of both the size of the cortex cells and the chromosome configurations indicated that most cells were too small for an orientation of the spindle parallel to the file axis. Space limitation force the spindle into an oblique position. Despite this spindle axis rotation, most daughter cells remained within the original cell file. Only in extremely flat cells did the position of the daughter nuclei forced the cell to set a plane of division parallel to the file axis, which result in side-by-side orientation of the daughter cells. Telophase spindle axis rotations are also observed inCrepis capillaris andPetunia hybrida.. These species have respectively medium and small sized chromosomes compared toVicia. Since space limitation, which causes the rotation, depends both on cell and chromosome size, the frequency and extent of the phenomenon in former two species is comparatively low.     

KIF18B is a cell type–specific regulator of spindle orientation in the epidermis

Proper spindle orientation is required for asymmetric cell division and the establishment of complex tissue architecture. In the developing epidermis, spindle orientation requires a conserved cortical protein complex of LGN/NuMA/dynein-dynactin. However, how microtubule dynamics are regulated to interact with this machinery and properly position the mitotic spindle is not fully understood. Furthermore, our understanding of the processes that link spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division to cell fate specification in distinct tissue contexts remains incomplete. We report a role for the microtubule catastrophe factor KIF18B in regulating microtubule dynamics to promote spindle orientation in keratinocytes. During mitosis, KIF18B accumulates at the cell cortex, colocalizing with the conserved spindle orientation machinery. In vivo we find that KIF18B is required for oriented cell divisions within the hair placode, the first stage of hair follicle morphogenesis, but is not essential in the interfollicular epidermis. Disrupting spindle orientation in the placode, using mutations in either KIF18B or NuMA, results in aberrant cell fate marker expression of hair follicle progenitor cells. These data functionally link spindle orientation to cell fate decisions during hair follicle morphogenesis. Taken together, our data demonstrate a role for regulated microtubule dynamics in spindle orientation in epidermal cells. This work also highlights the importance of spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division to dictate cell fate specification.     

Key role played by RhoA in the balance between planar and apico-basal cell divisions in the chick neuroepithelium

The cell division axis determines the position of daughter cells and is therefore critical for cell fate. During vertebrate neurogenesis, most cell divisions take place within the plane of the neuroepithelium (Das, T., Payer, B., Cayouette, M., and Harris, W.A. (2003). In vivo time-lapse imaging of cell divisions during neurogenesis in the developing zebrafish retina. Neuron 37, 597-609. Haydar, T.F., Ang, E., Jr., and Rakic, P. (2003). Mitotic spindle rotation and mode of cell division in the developing telencephalon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 2890-5. Kosodo, Y., Roper, K., Haubensak, W., Marzesco, A. M., Corbeil, D., and Huttner, W. B. (2004). Asymmetric distribution of the apical plasma membrane during neurogenic divisions of mammalian neuroepithelial cells. EMBO J. 23, 2314-24). The cellular constraints responsible for this preferential orientation are poorly understood. Combining electroporation and time-lapse confocal imaging of chick neural progenitors, the events responsible for positioning the mitotic spindle and their dependence on RhoA were investigated. The results indicate that the spindle forms with a random orientation. However, the final orientation of cell divisions is dependent on two main factors: (i) an early rotation of the spindle that aligns it within the plane of the neuroepithelium, and (ii) a specific limitation of spindle oscillations, despite free rotation around the apico-basal axis. Expressing a dominant-negative RhoA leads to apico-basal cell divisions after a correct initial rotation of the spindle. Our data reveal a specific role for RhoA in the maintenance of spindle orientation, prior to anaphase. Thus, RhoA could be a key player potentially regulated by the neurogenic program or by the neural stem cell environment to control the balance between planar and apico-basal divisions, during normal or pathological development.     

Spindle orientation in animal cell mitosis: roles of integrin in the control of spindle axis

The orientation of mitotic spindles, which determines the plane of cell division, is tightly regulated in polarized cells such as epithelial cells, but it has been unclear whether there is a mechanism regulating spindle orientation in non-polarized cultured cells. In adherent cultured cells, spindles are positioned at the center of the cells and the axis of the spindle lies in the longest axis of the cell. Thus, cell geometry is thought to be one of cues for spindle orientation and positioning in cultured cells because this defines the center and the long axis of the cell. Recent work provides a new insight into the spindle orientation in cultured cells; spindles are aligned along the axis parallel to the cell-substrate adhesion plane. Concomitantly, integrin-mediated cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM), rather than gravitation, cell-cell adhesion or cell geometry, has shown to be essential for this mechanism of spindle orientation. Several independent lines of evidence confirm the involvement of cell-ECM adhesion in spindle orientation in both cultured cells and in developing organisms. The important future challenge is to identify a molecular mechanism(s) that links integrin and spindles in the control of spindle axis.     

The Fz-Dsh planar cell polarity pathway induces oriented cell division via Mud/NuMA in Drosophila and zebrafish

The Frizzled receptor and Dishevelled effector regulate mitotic spindle orientation in both vertebrates and invertebrates, but how Dishevelled orients the mitotic spindle is unknown. Using the Drosophila S2 cell "induced polarity" system, we find that Dishevelled cortical polarity is sufficient to orient the spindle and that Dishevelled's DEP domain mediates this function. This domain binds a C-terminal domain of Mud (the Drosophila NuMA ortholog), and Mud is required for Dishevelled-mediated spindle orientation. In Drosophila, Frizzled-Dishevelled planar cell polarity (PCP) orients the sensory organ precursor (pI) spindle along the anterior-posterior axis. We show that Dishevelled and Mud colocalize at the posterior cortex of pI, Mud localization at the posterior cortex requires Dsh, and Mud loss-of-function randomizes spindle orientation. During zebrafish gastrulation, the Wnt11-Frizzled-Dishevelled PCP pathway orients spindles along the animal-vegetal axis, and reducing NuMA levels disrupts spindle orientation. Overall, we describe a Frizzled-Dishevelled-NuMA pathway that orients division from Drosophila to vertebrates.     

The inner compass of spindle positioning and orientation

Polarized cortical cues are known to guide spindle movements to dictate division axis and cleavage site during asymmetric cell division. In a recent issue of Nature Cell Biology, Kiyomitsu and Cheeseman (2012) report two novel spindle-intrinsic signals that regulate spindle orientation and position in symmetrically dividing human cells.     

A lateral belt of cortical LGN and NuMA guides mitotic spindle movements and planar division in neuroepithelial cells

To maintain tissue architecture, epithelial cells divide in a planar fashion, perpendicular to their main polarity axis. As the centrosome resumes an apical localization in interphase, planar spindle orientation is reset at each cell cycle. We used three-dimensional live imaging of GFP-labeled centrosomes to investigate the dynamics of spindle orientation in chick neuroepithelial cells. The mitotic spindle displays stereotypic movements during metaphase, with an active phase of planar orientation and a subsequent phase of planar maintenance before anaphase. We describe the localization of the NuMA and LGN proteins in a belt at the lateral cell cortex during spindle orientation. Finally, we show that the complex formed of LGN, NuMA, and of cortically located Gαi subunits is necessary for spindle movements and regulates the dynamics of spindle orientation. The restricted localization of LGN and NuMA in the lateral belt is instructive for the planar alignment of the mitotic spindle, and required for its planar maintenance.     

Automated tracking of mitotic spindle pole positions shows that LGN is required for spindle rotation but not orientation maintenance

Spindle orientation defines the plane of cell division and, thereby, the spatial position of all daughter cells. Here, we develop a live cell microscopy-based methodology to extract spindle movements in human epithelial cell lines and study how spindles are brought to a pre-defined orientation. We show that spindles undergo two distinct regimes of movements. Spindles are first actively rotated toward the cells’ long-axis and then maintained along this pre-defined axis. By quantifying spindle movements in cells depleted of LGN, we show that the first regime of rotational movements requires LGN that recruits cortical dynein. In contrast, the second regime of movements that maintains spindle orientation does not require LGN, but is sensitive to 2ME2 that suppresses microtubule dynamics. Our study sheds first insight into spatially defined spindle movement regimes in human cells, and supports the presence of LGN and dynein independent cortical anchors for astral microtubules.     

The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis

The cell division axis determines the future positions of daughter cells and is therefore critical for cell fate. The positioning of the division axis has been mostly studied in systems such as embryos or yeasts, in which cell shape is well defined. In these cases, cell shape anisotropy and cell polarity affect spindle orientation. It remains unclear whether cell geometry or cortical cues are determinants for spindle orientation in mammalian cultured cells. The cell environment is composed of an extracellular matrix (ECM), which is connected to the intracellular actin cytoskeleton via transmembrane proteins. We used micro-contact printing to control the spatial distribution of the ECM on the substrate and demonstrated that it has a role in determining the orientation of the division axis of HeLa cells. On the basis of our analysis of the average distributions of actin-binding proteins in interphase and mitosis, we propose that the ECM controls the location of actin dynamics at the membrane, and thus the segregation of cortical components in interphase. This segregation is further maintained on the cortex of mitotic cells and used for spindle orientation.     

Spindle polarity in S. cerevisiae: MEN can tell

Spatial coordination between the axis of the spindle and the division plane is critical in asymmetric cell divisions. In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, orientation of the mitotic spindle responds to two intertwined programs dictating the position of the spindle poles: one providing the blueprint for built-in pole asymmetry, the other sequentially confining microtubule-cortex interactions to the bud and the bud neck. The first program sets a temporal asymmetry to limit astral microtubules to a single pole prior to spindle pole separation. The second enforces this polarity by allowing these early formed microtubules to undergo capture at the bud cell cortex while stopping newly formed microtubules once cortical capture shifts to the bud neck. The remarkable precision of this integrated program results in an invariant pattern of spindle pole inheritance in which the "old" spindle pole is destined to the bud. An additional layer of asymmetry is superimposed to couple successful chromosomal segregation between the mother and the bud with mitotic exit. This is based on the asymmetric localization to the committed daughter-bound pole of signaling components of the mitotic exit network. This system operates irrespective of intrinsic spindle polarity to ensure that it is always the pole translocating into the bud that carries the signal to regulate mitotic exit.     

Cell shape and cell division

The correlation between cell shape elongation and the orientation of the division axis described by early cell biologists is still used as a paradigm in developmental studies. However, analysis of early embryo development and tissue morphogenesis has highlighted the role of the spatial distribution of cortical cues able to guide spindle orientation. In vitro studies of cell division have revealed similar mechanisms. Recent data support the possibility that the orientation of cell division in mammalian cells is dominated by cell adhesion and the associated traction forces developed in interphase. Cell shape is a manifestation of these adhesive and tensional patterns. These patterns control the spatial distribution of cortical signals and thereby guide spindle orientation and daughter cell positioning. From these data, cell division appears to be a continuous transformation ensuring the maintenance of tissue mechanical integrity.     

SLK-dependent activation of ERMs controls LGN–NuMA localization and spindle orientation

Mitotic spindle orientation relies on a complex dialog between the spindle microtubules and the cell cortex, in which F-actin has been recently implicated. Here, we report that the membrane–actin linkers ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERMs) are strongly and directly activated by the Ste20-like kinase at mitotic entry in mammalian cells. Using microfabricated adhesive substrates to control the axis of cell division, we found that the activation of ERMs plays a key role in guiding the orientation of the mitotic spindle. Accordingly, impairing ERM activation in apical progenitors of the mouse embryonic neocortex severely disturbed spindle orientation in vivo. At the molecular level, ERM activation promotes the polarized association at the mitotic cortex of leucine-glycine-asparagine repeat protein (LGN) and nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) protein, two essential factors for spindle orientation. We propose that activated ERMs, together with Gαi, are critical for the correct localization of LGN–NuMA force generator complexes and hence for proper spindle orientation.     

Regulation of mitotic spindle orientation: an integrated view

Mitotic spindle orientation is essential for cell fate decisions, epithelial maintenance, and tissue morphogenesis. In most animal cell types, the dynein motor complex is anchored at the cell cortex and exerts pulling forces on astral microtubules to position the spindle. Early studies identified the evolutionarily conserved Gαi/LGN/NuMA complex as a key regulator that polarizes cortical force generators. In recent years, a combination of genetics, biochemistry, modeling, and live imaging has contributed to decipher the mechanisms of spindle orientation. Here, we highlight the dynamic nature of the assembly of this complex and discuss the molecular regulation of its localization. Remarkably, a number of LGN‐independent mechanisms were described recently, whereas NuMA remains central in most pathways involved in recruiting force generators at the cell cortex. We also describe the emerging role of the actin cortex in spindle orientation and discuss how dynamic astral microtubule formation is involved. We further give an overview on instructive external signals that control spindle orientation in tissues. Finally, we discuss the influence of cell geometry and mechanical forces on spindle orientation.     

A Highlights from MBoC Selection: Cell shape impacts on the positioning of the mitotic spindle with respect to the substratum

All known mechanisms of mitotic spindle orientation rely on astral microtubules. We report that even in the absence of astral microtubules, metaphase spindles in MDCK and HeLa cells are not randomly positioned along their x-z dimension, but preferentially adopt shallow β angles between spindle pole axis and substratum. The nonrandom spindle positioning is due to constraints imposed by the cell cortex in flat cells that drive spindles that are longer and/or wider than the cell''s height into a tilted, quasidiagonal x-z position. In rounder cells, which are taller, fewer cortical constraints make the x-z spindle position more random. Reestablishment of astral microtubule–mediated forces align the spindle poles with cortical cues parallel to the substratum in all cells. However, in flat cells, they frequently cause spindle deformations. Similar deformations are apparent when confined spindles rotate from tilted to parallel positions while MDCK cells progress from prometaphase to metaphase. The spindle disruptions cause the engagement of the spindle assembly checkpoint. We propose that cell rounding serves to maintain spindle integrity during its positioning.     

Spindle Polarity in S. cerevisiae: MEN Can Tell

Spatial coordination between the axis of the spindle and the division plane is critical in asymmetric cell divisions. In the budding yeast S. cerevisiae, orientation of the mitotic spindle responds to two intertwined programs dictating the position of the spindle poles: one providing the blueprint for built-in pole asymmetry, the other sequentially confining microtubule-cortex interactions to the bud and the bud neck. The first program sets a temporal asymmetry to limit astral microtubules to a single pole prior to spindle pole separation. The second enforces this polarity by allowing these early formed microtubules to undergo capture at the bud cell cortex while stopping newly formed microtubules once cortical capture shifts to the bud neck. The remarkable precision of this integrated program results in an invariant pattern of spindle pole inheritance in which the "old" spindle pole is destined to the bud. An additional layer of asymmetry is superimposed to couple successful chromosomal segregation between the mother and the bud with mitotic exit. This is based on the asymmetric localization to the committed daughter-bound pole of signaling components of the mitotic exit network. This system operates irrespective of intrinsic spindle polarity to ensure that it is always the pole translocating into the bud that carries the signal to regulate mitotic exit.

Key Words:

Cell cycle, Polarity, checkpoint, Microtubule, Cortical cues     

The force and effect of cell proliferation

EMBO J 32: 2790–2803 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.197; published online September102013The spatiotemporal control of cell divisions is a key factor in epithelial morphogenesis and patterning. Mao et al (2013) now describe how differential rates of proliferation within the Drosophila wing disc epithelium give rise to anisotropic tissue tension in peripheral/proximal regions of the disc. Such global tissue tension anisotropy in turn determines the orientation of cell divisions by controlling epithelial cell elongation.Oriented cell divisions play important roles in the establishment of the animal body plan by both influencing tissue morphogenesis and generating cellular diversity. Generally, the direction of the cell division plane is determined by the orientation of the mitotic spindle prior to cytokinesis. The observation that the mitotic spindle in most animal cell types aligns with the cell''s longest axis has led to the formulation of the ‘long-axis-rule'', postulating that cell shape anisotropy is the main determinant of spindle orientation (Minc et al, 2011). However, cell shape anisotropy is unlikely to be the only determinant since many cell types round up during mitosis, thereby losing their shape anisotropy and others do not follow the long-axis-rule at all. In such cases, division orientation is determined by the polarizing activity of biochemical signals originating from the environment (reviewed in Morin and Bellaïche, 2011). In addition, externally applied forces have also been suggested to control division orientation of single cells in culture independently from their effect on cell shape (Fink et al, 2011).Epithelial growth implies that cells divide parallel to the tissue plane with both daughter cells remaining integrated within the tissue. Although it has been recognized that defects in apico-basal polarity lead to spindle misalignment and disruption of epithelial architecture, the molecular mechanisms underlying this regulation are still unknown. Recent work in the Drosophila wing disc epithelium uncovered that the junctional proteins Scribbled and Discs large 1 (Dlg1) are required for proper spindle alignment parallel to the tissue plane (Nakajima et al, 2013). Similarly, in the Drosophila follicular epithelium, spindle orientation is dependent on the lateral localization of Dlg1, independently of its role in apico-basal polarity (Bergstralh et al, 2013). While such mechanisms ensure that cells divide parallel to the epithelial plane, other mechanisms must still be present to determine the orientation of the mitotic spindle within this plane.In the Drosophila wing disc epithelium, symmetric cell divisions preferentially align with the proximal-distal (PD) axis, thus elongating the organ along this axis (Baena-López et al, 2005). This preferential cell division orientation is determined by the Fat-Dachsous pathway, which promotes accumulation of the atypical myosin Dachs at PD cellular junctions. The polarized activity of Dachs in turn drives cell elongation along the PD axis, leading to a preferential orientation of the mitotic spindle along this axis (Mao et al, 2011). In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Mao et al (2013) report that while mitotic cells located in central regions of the wing disc indeed elongate and divide along the PD axis, cells located in the periphery (proximal edge) elongate and divide orthogonally to the PD axis (Figure 1). These results suggested some type of global planar tissue polarization in proximal regions of the wing disc overriding the local effects of Dachs on spindle orientation. By using laser ablation to reveal tissue tension, the authors showed that in peripheral/proximal regions of the wing disc, junctions oriented orthogonal to the PD axis (PD junctions) are under higher tension than junctions oriented along this axis (lateral junctions; Figure 1). This led them to hypothesize that anisotropic tissue tension might control division orientation of proximal wing cells. Through a combination of elegant genetic experiments and theoretical modelling, the authors then demonstrated that this global tension anisotropy in the proximal wing disc arises from higher cell division rates observed in central versus proximal regions of the wing disc. Furthermore, this apparent tension anisotropy causes concentric elongation of proximal wing disc cells orienting their mitotic spindle orthogonal to the PD axis (Figure 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Differential rates of cell division between distal (green) and proximal (red) regions of the Drosophila wing disc epithelium (1) give rise to global patterns of tension anisotropy within the tissue (2). This tension anisotropy promotes cell elongation along the main axis of tension, thereby controlling the orientation of cell division via cell shape anisotropies in proximal regions of the wing disc (3); D, distal; P, proximal.Collectively, these results demonstrate that differential proliferation rates within a tissue can generate global tension anisotropies, which promote cell shape changes that again influence cell division orientation. Further dissection of the mechanisms by which tissue tension controls cell division orientation will clarify if anisotropic tension controls division orientation solely through cell elongation, or if additional mechanosensing mechanisms exist that more directly convey tissue tension information to the mitotic spindle. It might also be worth exploring whether cell divisions along the main axis of tension within the wing disc affect global tension anisotropy, and whether the formation of anisotropic tension around areas of cell proliferation affects the rate of cell division therein. Such interplay between tissue tension anisotropy and cell division orientation/rate will likely be critical for maintaining physiological degrees of tissue tension and growth.In general, the work by Mao et al (2013) provides compelling evidence for a functional link between tissue tension and cell division orientation in a physiological relevant context, paving the way for future studies addressing the reciprocal relationship between these two aspects in tissue morphogenesis.