New clues for a cold case: nitric oxide response to low temperature

Low temperature is among the most frequent stresses met by plants during their lifespan, and a plant's ability to cold‐acclimate is a determinant for further growth and development. Although intensive research has provided a good picture of the molecular and metabolic changes triggered by cold, the underlying regulatory mechanisms remain elusive and are thus being actively sought. Recent studies have shed light on the importance of nitric oxide (NO), a ubiquitous signalling molecule in eukaryotes, for plant tolerance to chilling and freezing. Indeed, NO formation following cold exposure has been reported in a range of plant species, and a series of proteins targeted by NO‐based post‐translational modifications have been identified. Moreover, key cold‐regulated genes have been characterized as NO‐dependent, suggesting the crucial importance of NO signalling for cold‐responsive gene expression. This review provides a picture of our current understanding of the function of NO in the context of plant response to cold. Particular attention is dedicated to the open questions left by the fragmented data currently available concerning NO formation, transduction and biological significance for plant adaptation to low temperature.     

Characterisation of the nuclear proteome of a dehydration‐sensitive cultivar of chickpea and comparative proteomic analysis with a tolerant cultivar

Water deficit or dehydration hampers plant growth and development, and shrinks harvest size of major crop species worldwide. Therefore, a better understanding of dehydration response is the key to decipher the regulatory mechanism of better adaptation. In recent years, nuclear proteomics has become an attractive area of research, particularly to study the role of nucleus in stress response. In this study, a proteome of dehydration‐sensitive chickpea cultivar (ICCV‐2) was generated from nuclei‐enriched fractions. The LC‐MS/MS analysis led to the identification of 75 differentially expressed proteins presumably associated with different metabolic and regulatory pathways. Nuclear localisation of three candidate proteins was validated by transient expression assay. The ICCV‐2 proteome was then compared with that of JG‐62, a tolerant cultivar. The differential proteomics and in silico analysis revealed cultivar‐specific differential expression of many proteins involved in various cellular functions. The differential tolerance could be attributed to altered expression of many structural proteins and the proteins involved in stress adaptation, notably the ROS catabolising enzymes. Further, a comprehensive comparison on the abiotic stress‐responsive nuclear proteome was performed using the datasets published thus far. These findings might expedite the functional determination of the dehydration‐responsive proteins and their prioritisation as potential molecular targets for better adaptation.     

Differential modulation of S‐nitrosoproteome of Brassica juncea by low temperature: Change in S‐nitrosylation of Rubisco is responsible for the inactivation of its carboxylase activity

Nitric oxide (NO), a new addition to plant hormones, affects numerous processes in planta. It is produced as a part of stress response, but its signaling is poorly understood. S‐nitrosylation, a PTM, is currently the most investigated modification of NO. Recent studies indicate significant modulation of metabolome by S‐nitrosylation, as the identified targets span major metabolic pathways and regulatory proteins. Identification of S‐nitrosylation targets is necessary to understand NO signaling. By combining biotin switch technique and MS, 20 S‐nitrosylated proteins including four novel ones were identified from Brassica juncea. Further, to know if the abiotic stress‐induced NO evolution contributes to S‐nitrosothiols (SNO), the cellular NO reservoirs, SNO content was measured by Saville method. Low temperature (LT)‐stress resulted in highest (1.4‐fold) SNO formation followed by drought, high temperature and salinity. LT induced differentially nitrosylated proteins were identified as photosynthetic, plant defense related, glycolytic and signaling associated. Interestingly, both the subunits of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) showed an increase as well as a decrease in nitrosylation by LT. Inactivation of Rubisco carboxylase by LT is well documented but the mechanism is not known. Here, we show that LT‐induced S‐nitrosylation is responsible for significant (～40%) inactivation of Rubisco. This in turn could explain cold stress‐induced photosynthetic inhibition.     

Cross‐compartment proteostasis regulation during redox imbalance induced ER stress

Imbalance in protein homeostasis in specific subcellular organelles is alleviated through organelle‐specific stress response pathways. As a canonical example of stress activated pathway, accumulation of misfolded proteins in ER activates unfolded protein response (UPR) in almost all eukaryotic organisms. However, very little is known about the involvement of proteins of other organelles that help to maintain the cellular protein homeostasis during ER stress. In this study, using iTRAQ‐based LC–MS approach, we identified organelle enriched proteins that are differentially expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) during ER stress in the absence of UPR sensor Ire1p. We have identified about 750 proteins from enriched organelle fraction in three independent iTRAQ experiments. Induction of ER stress resulted in the differential expression of 93 proteins in WT strains, 40 of which were found to be dependent on IRE1. Our study reveals a cross‐talk between ER‐ and mitochondrial proteostasis exemplified by an Ire1p‐dependent induction of Hsp60p, a mitochondrial chaperone. Thus, in this study, we show changes in protein levels in various organelles in response to ER stress. A large fraction of these changes were dependent on canonical UPR signalling through Ire1, highlighting the importance of interorganellar cross‐talk during stress.     

Evolution and functional cross‐talk of protein post‐translational modifications

Protein post‐translational modifications (PTMs) allow the cell to regulate protein activity and play a crucial role in the response to changes in external conditions or internal states. Advances in mass spectrometry now enable proteome wide characterization of PTMs and have revealed a broad functional role for a range of different types of modifications. Here we review advances in the study of the evolution and function of PTMs that were spurred by these technological improvements. We provide an overview of studies focusing on the origin and evolution of regulatory enzymes as well as the evolutionary dynamics of modification sites. Finally, we discuss different mechanisms of altering protein activity via post‐translational regulation and progress made in the large‐scale functional characterization of PTM function.     

Regulation of connexin‐ and pannexin‐based channels by post‐translational modifications

Connexin (Cx) and pannexin (Panx) proteins form large conductance channels, which function as regulators of communication between neighbouring cells via gap junctions and/or hemichannels. Intercellular communication is essential to coordinate cellular responses in tissues and organs, thereby fulfilling an essential role in the spreading of signalling, survival and death processes. The functional properties of gap junctions and hemichannels are modulated by different physiological and pathophysiological stimuli. At the molecular level, Cxs and Panxs function as multi‐protein channel complexes, regulating their channel localisation and activity. In addition to this, gap junctional channels and hemichannels are modulated by different post‐translational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation, glycosylation, proteolysis, N‐acetylation, S‐nitrosylation, ubiquitination, lipidation, hydroxylation, methylation and deamidation. These PTMs influence almost all aspects of communicating junctional channels in normal cell biology and pathophysiology. In this review, we will provide a systematic overview of PTMs of communicating junction proteins and discuss their effects on Cx and Panx‐channel activity and localisation.     

MOTS‐c: A Mitochondrial‐Encoded Regulator of the Nucleus

Mitochondria are increasingly being recognized as information hubs that sense cellular changes and transmit messages to other cellular components, such as the nucleus, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the Golgi apparatus, and lysosomes. Nonetheless, the interaction between mitochondria and the nucleus is of special interest because they both host part of the cellular genome. Thus, the communication between genome‐bearing organelles would likely include gene expression regulation. Multiple nuclear‐encoded proteins have been known to regulate mitochondrial gene expression. On the contrary, no mitochondrial‐encoded factors are known to actively regulate nuclear gene expression. MOTS‐c (mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S ribosomal RNA type‐c) is a recently identified peptide encoded within the mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA gene that has metabolic functions. Notably, MOTS‐c can translocate to the nucleus upon metabolic stress (e.g., glucose restriction and oxidative stress) and directly regulate adaptive nuclear gene expression to promote cellular homeostasis. It is hypothesized that cellular fitness requires the coevolved mitonuclear genomes to coordinate adaptive responses using gene‐encoded factors that cross‐regulate the opposite genome. This suggests that cellular gene expression requires the bipartite split genomes to operate as a unified system, rather than the nucleus being the sole master regulator.     

Comparative proteomics of dehydration response in the rice nucleus: New insights into the molecular basis of genotype‐specific adaptation

Dehydration is the most crucial environmental factor that considerably reduces the crop harvest index, and thus has become a concern for global agriculture. To better understand the role of nuclear proteins in water‐deficit condition, a nuclear proteome was developed from a dehydration‐sensitive rice cultivar IR‐64 followed by its comparison with that of a dehydration‐tolerant c.v. Rasi. The 2DE protein profiling of c.v. IR‐64 coupled with MS/MS analysis led to the identification of 93 dehydration‐responsive proteins (DRPs). Among those identified proteins, 78 were predicted to be destined to the nucleus, accounting for more than 80% of the dataset. While the detected number of protein spots in c.v. IR‐64 was higher when compared with that of Rasi, the number of DRPs was found to be less. Fifty‐seven percent of the DRPs were found to be common to both sensitive and tolerant cultivars, indicating significant differences between the two nuclear proteomes. Further, we constructed a functional association network of the DRPs of c.v. IR‐64, which suggests that a significant number of the proteins are capable of interacting with each other. The combination of nuclear proteome and interactome analyses would elucidate stress‐responsive signaling and the molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants.     

The expression of MMP‐1 and MMP‐9 is up‐regulated by smooth muscle cells after their cross‐talk with macrophages in high glucose conditions

Patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease‐related death, exhibiting highly vulnerable plaques. Many studies have highlighted the major role of macrophages (MAC) and smooth muscle cells (SMC) and the essential part of metalloproteases (MMPs) in atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability. We hypothesize that in diabetes, the interplay between MAC and SMC in high glucose conditions may modify the expression of MMPs involved in plaque vulnerability. The SMC‐MAC cross‐talk was achieved using trans‐well chambers, where human SMC were grown at the bottom and human MAC in the upper chamber in normal (NG) or high (HG) glucose concentration. After cross‐talk, the conditioned media and cells were isolated and investigated for the expression of MMPs, MCP‐1 and signalling molecules. We found that upon cross‐talk with MAC in HG, SMC exhibit: (i) augmented expression of MMP‐1 and MMP‐9; (ii) significant increase in the enzymatic activity of MMP‐9; (iii) higher levels of soluble MCP‐1 chemokine which is functionally active and involved in MMPs up‐regulation; (iv) activated PKCα signalling pathway which, together with NF‐kB are responsible for MMP‐1 and MMP‐9 up‐regulation, and (v) impaired function of collagen assembly. Taken together, our data indicate that MCP‐1 released by cell cross‐talk in diabetic conditions binds to CCR2 and triggers MMP‐1 and MMP‐9 over‐expression and activity, features that could explain the high vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaque found at diabetic patients.     

Nitric oxide function in plant abiotic stress

Abiotic stress is one of the main threats affecting crop growth and production. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underpin plant responses against environmental insults will be crucial to help guide the rational design of crop plants to counter these challenges. A key feature during abiotic stress is the production of nitric oxide (NO), an important concentration dependent, redox‐related signalling molecule. NO can directly or indirectly interact with a wide range of targets leading to the modulation of protein function and the reprogramming of gene expression. The transfer of NO bioactivity can occur through a variety of potential mechanisms but chief among these is S‐nitrosylation, a prototypic, redox‐based, post‐translational modification. However, little is known about this pivotal molecular amendment in the regulation of abiotic stress signalling. Here, we describe the emerging knowledge concerning the function of NO and S‐nitrosylation during plant responses to abiotic stress.     

Antibiotic‐dependent perturbations of extended spectrum beta‐lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae proteome

Extended spectrum beta‐lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL‐KP) causes life‐threatening infections in susceptible and immuno‐compromised individuals. Because of the emergence of multidrug resistance and tolerance, it is crucial to better understand the mechanisms by which ESBL‐KP can adapt to antibiotic stress. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the global proteome changes occurring in ESBL‐KP in response to sub‐lethal concentrations of the antibiotics doxycycline (DC, bacteriostatic) and streptomycin (SM, bactericidal), which both impair ribosomal synthesis of bacterial proteins. These results represent the greatest experimental coverage of the ESBL‐KP proteome yet described. The 1538 proteins, representing 30% of the 5126 predicted KP gene products were identified from the combined experimental groups. Antibiotic stress resulted in significantly elevated levels of 42 proteins for DC and 55 for SM treatments, whereas 53 proteins were reduced for DC‐ and six for SM‐treated bacteria. Specifically, the ESBL‐KP response to DC was accompanied by the reduced levels of the porins LamB, CirA, FepA, and OmpC. In contrast to DC, the stress response to SM demonstrated a dramatic increase in the peroxidase detoxification pathway proteins PutA, KatG, KatE, and Dps, which prevent harmful hydroxyl radical formation. The results from this proteomic study are important for understanding adaptive responses to antibiotics, and may provide novel targets for the development of new therapeutic strategies.     

Taxonomic distribution,repeats, and functions of the S1 domain‐containing proteins as members of the OB‐fold family

Proteins of the nucleic acid‐binding proteins superfamily perform such functions as processing, transport, storage, stretching, translation, and degradation of RNA. It is one of the 16 superfamilies containing the OB‐fold in protein structures. Here, we have analyzed the superfamily of nucleic acid‐binding proteins (the number of sequences exceeds 200,000) and obtained that this superfamily prevalently consists of proteins containing the cold shock DNA‐binding domain (ca. 131,000 protein sequences). Proteins containing the S1 domain compose 57% from the cold shock DNA‐binding domain family. Furthermore, we have found that the S1 domain was identified mainly in the bacterial proteins (ca. 83%) compared to the eukaryotic and archaeal proteins, which are available in the UniProt database. We have found that the number of multiple repeats of S1 domain in the S1 domain‐containing proteins depends on the taxonomic affiliation. All archaeal proteins contain one copy of the S1 domain, while the number of repeats in the eukaryotic proteins varies between 1 and 15 and correlates with the protein size. In the bacterial proteins, the number of repeats is no more than 6, regardless of the protein size. The large variation of the repeat number of S1 domain as one of the structural variants of the OB‐fold is a distinctive feature of S1 domain‐containing proteins. Proteins from the other families and superfamilies have either one OB‐fold or change slightly the repeat numbers. On the whole, it can be supposed that the repeat number is a vital for multifunctional activity of the S1 domain‐containing proteins. Proteins 2017; 85:602–613. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.