Structure of the utrophin actin-binding domain bound to F-actin reveals binding by an induced fit mechanism

Utrophin is a large ubiquitously expressed cytoskeletal protein, homologous to dystrophin, the protein disrupted in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The association of both proteins with the actin cytoskeleton is functionally important and is mediated by a domain at their N termini, conserved in members of the spectrin superfamily, including alpha-actinin, beta-spectrin and fimbrin. We present the structure of the actin-binding domain of utrophin in complex with F-actin, determined by cryo-electron microscopy and helical reconstruction, and a pseudo-atomic model of the complex, generated by docking the crystal structures of the utrophin domain and F-actin into the reconstruction. In contrast to the model of actin binding proposed for fimbrin, the utrophin actin-binding domain appears to associate with actin in an extended conformation. This conformation places residues that are highly conserved in utrophin and other members of the spectrin superfamily at the utrophin interface with actin, confirming the likelihood of this binding orientation. This model emphasises the importance of protein flexibility in modeling interactions and presents the fascinating possibility of a diversity of actin-binding mechanisms among related proteins.     

The utrophin actin-binding domain binds F-actin in two different modes: implications for the spectrin superfamily of proteins

Utrophin, like its homologue dystrophin, forms a link between the actin cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. We have used a new method of image analysis to reconstruct actin filaments decorated with the actin-binding domain of utrophin, which contains two calponin homology domains. We find two different modes of binding, with either one or two calponin-homology (CH) domains bound per actin subunit, and these modes are also distinguishable by their very different effects on F-actin rigidity. Both modes involve an extended conformation of the CH domains, as predicted by a previous crystal structure. The separation of these two modes has been largely dependent upon the use of our new approach to reconstruction of helical filaments. When existing information about tropomyosin, myosin, actin-depolymerizing factor, and nebulin is considered, these results suggest that many actin-binding proteins may have multiple binding sites on F-actin. The cell may use the modular CH domains found in the spectrin superfamily of actin-binding proteins to bind actin in manifold ways, allowing for complexity to arise from the interactions of a relatively few simple modules with actin.     

An atomic model for actin binding by the CH domains and spectrin-repeat modules of utrophin and dystrophin

Utrophin and dystrophin link cytoskeletal F-actin filaments to the plasmalemma. Genetic strategies to replace defective dystrophin with utrophin in individuals with muscular dystrophy requires full characterization of these proteins. Both contain homologous N-terminal actin-binding motifs composed of a pair of calponin-homology (CH) domains (CH1 and CH2) that are connected by spectrin-repeat modules to C-terminal membrane-binding sequences. Here, electron microscopy and 3D reconstruction of F-actin decorated with utrophin and dystrophin actin-binding constructs were performed using Utr261 (utrophin's CH domain pair), Utr416 (utrophin's CH domains and first spectrin-repeat) and Dys246 (dystrophin's CH domain pair). The lozenge-like utrophin CH domain densities localized to the upper surface of actin subdomain 1 and extended azimuthally over subdomain 2 toward subdomains 3 and 4. The cylinder-shaped spectrin-repeat was located at the end of the CH domain pair and was aligned longitudinally along the cleft between inner and outer actin domains, where tropomyosin is present when on thin filaments. The connection between the spectrin-repeat module and the CH domains defined the orientation of CH1 and CH2 on actin. Resolution of utrophin's CH domains and spectrin-repeats permitted docking of crystal structures into respective EM densities, leading to an atomic model where both CH and spectrin-domains bind actin. The CH domain-actin interaction for dystrophin was found to be more complex than for utrophin. Binding assays showed that Utr261 and Utr416 interacted with F-actin as monomers, whereas Dys246 appeared to associate as a dimer, consistent with a bilobed Dys246 structure observed on F-actin in electron microscope reconstructions. One of the lobes was similar in shape, position and orientation to the monomeric CH domains of Utr261, while the other lobe apparently represented a second set of CH domains in the dimeric Dys246. The extensive contact made by dystrophin on actin may be used in vivo to help muscles dissipate mechanical stress from the contractile apparatus to the extracellular matrix.     

Biochemical characterisation of the actin-binding properties of utrophin

Utrophin is a large ubiquitously expressed cytoskeletal protein that is important for maturation of vertebrate neuromuscular junctions. It is highly homologous to dystrophin, the protein defective in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Utrophin binds to the actin cytoskeleton via an N-terminal actin-binding domain, which is related to the actin-binding domains of members of the spectrin superfamily of proteins. We have determined the actin-binding properties of this utrophin domain and investigated its binding site on F-actin. An F-actin cosedimentation assay confirmed that the domain binds more tightly to beta-F-actin than to alpha-F-actin and that the full-length utrophin domain binds more tightly to both actin isoforms than a truncated construct, lacking a characteristic utrophin N-terminal extension. Both domain constructs exist in solution as compact monomers and bind to actin as 1:1 complexes. Analysis of the products of partial proteolysis of the domain in the presence of F-actin showed that the N-terminal extension was protected by binding to actin. The actin isoform dependence of utrophin binding could reflect differences at the N-termini of the actin isoforms, thus localising the utrophin-binding site on actin. The involvement of the actin N-terminus in utrophin binding was also supported by competition binding assays using myosin subfragment S1, which also binds F-actin near its N-terminus. Cross-linking studies suggested that utrophin contacts two actin monomers in the actin filament as does myosin S1. These biochemical approaches complement our structural studies and facilitate characterisation of the actin-binding properties of the utrophin actin-binding domain.     

The structure of the N-terminal actin-binding domain of human dystrophin and how mutations in this domain may cause Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND: Dystrophin is an essential component of skeletal muscle cells. Its N-terminal domain binds to F-actin and its C terminus binds to the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein (DAG) complex in the membrane. Dystrophin is therefore thought to serve as a link from the actin-based cytoskeleton of the muscle cell through the plasma membrane to the extracellular matrix. Pathogenic mutations in dystrophin result in Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy. RESULTS: The crystal structure of the dystrophin actin-binding domain (ABD) has been determined at 2.6 A resolution. The structure is an antiparallel dimer of two ABDs each comprising two calponin homology domains (CH1 and CH2) that are linked by a central alpha helix. The CH domains are both alpha-helical globular folds. Comparisons with the structures of utrophin and fimbrin ABDs reveal that the conformations of the individual CH domains are very similar to those of dystrophin but that the arrangement of the two CH domains within the ABD is altered. The dystrophin dimer reveals a change of 72 degrees in the orientation of one pair of CH1 and CH2 domains (from different monomers) relative to the other pair when compared with the utrophin dimer. The dystrophin monomer is more elongated than the fimbrin ABD. CONCLUSIONS: The dystrophin ABD structure reveals a previously uncharacterised arrangement of the CH domains within the ABD. This observation has implications for the mechanism of actin binding by dystrophin and related proteins. Examining the position of three pathogenic missense mutations within the structure suggests that they exert their effects through misfolding of the ABD, rather than through disruption of the binding to F-actin.     

Impacts of dystrophin and utrophin domains on actin structural dynamics: implications for therapeutic design

We have used time-resolved phosphorescence anisotropy (TPA) of actin to evaluate domains of dystrophin and utrophin, with implications for gene therapy in muscular dystrophy. Dystrophin and its homolog utrophin bind to cytoskeletal actin to form mechanical linkages that prevent muscular damage. Because these proteins are too large for most gene therapy vectors, much effort is currently devoted to smaller constructs. We previously used TPA to show that both dystrophin and utrophin have a paradoxical effect on actin rotational dynamics-restricting amplitude while increasing rate, thus increasing resilience, with utrophin more effective than dystrophin. Here, we have evaluated individual domains of these proteins. We found that a "mini-dystrophin," lacking one of the two actin-binding domains, is less effective than dystrophin in regulating actin dynamics, correlating with its moderate effectiveness in rescuing the dystrophic phenotype in mice. In contrast, we found that a "micro-utrophin," with more extensive internal deletions, is as effective as full-length dystrophin in the regulation of actin dynamics. Each of utrophin's actin-binding domains promotes resilience in actin, while dystrophin constructs require the presence of both actin-binding domains and the C-terminal domain for full function. This work supports the use of a utrophin template for gene or protein therapy designs. Resilience of the actin-protein complex, measured by TPA, correlates remarkably well with previous reports of functional rescue by dystrophin and utrophin constructs in mdx mice. We propose the use of TPA as an in vitro method to aid in the design and testing of emerging gene therapy constructs.     

Actin-binding domain of mouse plectin. Crystal structure and binding to vimentin.

Plectin, a large and widely expressed cytolinker protein, is composed of several subdomains that harbor binding sites for a variety of different interaction partners. A canonical actin-binding domain (ABD) comprising two calponin homology domains (CH1 and CH2) is located in proximity to its amino terminus. However, the ABD of plectin is unique among actin-binding proteins as it is expressed in the form of distinct, plectin isoform-specific versions. We have determined the three-dimensional structure of two distinct crystalline forms of one of its ABD versions (pleABD/2alpha) from mouse, to a resolution of 1.95 and 2.0 A. Comparison of pleABD/2alpha with the ABDs of fimbrin and utrophin revealed structural similarity between plectin and fimbrin, although the proteins share only low sequence identity. In fact, pleABD/2alpha has been found to have the same compact fold as the human plectin ABD and the fimbrin ABD, differing from the open conformation described for the ABDs of utrophin and dystrophin. Plectin harbors a specific binding site for intermediate filaments of various types within its carboxy-terminal R5 repeat domain. Our experiments revealed an additional vimentin-binding site of plectin, residing within the CH1 subdomain of its ABD. We show that vimentin binds to this site via the amino-terminal part of its rod domain. This additional amino-terminal intermediate filament protein binding site of plectin may have a function in intermediate filament dynamics and assembly, rather than in linking and stabilizing intermediate filament networks.     

Dystrophin and utrophin bind actin through distinct modes of contact

This study was designed to define the molecular epitopes of dystrophin-actin interaction and to directly compare the actin binding properties of dystrophin and utrophin. According to our data, dystrophin and utrophin both bound alongside actin filaments with submicromolar affinities. However, the molecular epitopes involved in actin binding differed between the two proteins. In utrophin, the amino-terminal domain and an adjacent string of the first 10 spectrin-like repeats more fully recapitulated the activities measured for full-length protein. The homologous region of dystrophin bound actin with low affinity and near 1:1 stoichiometry as previously measured for the isolated amino-terminal, tandem (CH) domain. In contrast, a dystrophin construct including a cluster of basic spectrin-like repeats and spanning from the amino terminus through repeat 17, bound actin with properties most similar to full-length dystrophin. Dystrophin and utrophin both stabilized preformed actin filaments from forced depolymerization with similar efficacies but did not appear to compete for binding sites on actin. We also found that dystrophin binding to F-actin was markedly sensitive to increasing ionic strength, although utrophin binding was unaffected. Although dystrophin and utrophin are functionally homologous actin-binding proteins, these results indicate that their respective modes of contact with actin filaments are markedly different. Finally, we reassessed the abundance of dystrophin in striated muscle using full-length protein as the standard and measured greater than 10-fold higher values than previously reported.     

Flexibility in the N‐terminal actin‐binding domain: Clues from in silico mutations and molecular dynamics

Dystrophin is a long, rod‐shaped cytoskeleton protein implicated in muscular dystrophy (MDys). Utrophin is the closest autosomal homolog of dystrophin. Both proteins have N‐terminal actin‐binding domain (N‐ABD), a central rod domain and C‐terminal region. N‐ABD, composed of two calponin homology (CH) subdomains joined by a helical linker, harbors a few disease causing missense mutations. Although the two proteins share considerable homology (>72%) in N‐ABD, recent structural and biochemical studies have shown that there are significant differences (including stability, mode of actin‐binding) and their functions are not completely interchangeable. In this investigation, we have used extensive molecular dynamics simulations to understand the differences and the similarities of these two proteins, along with another actin‐binding protein, fimbrin. In silico mutations were performed to identify two key residues that might be responsible for the dynamical difference between the molecules. Simulation points to the inherent flexibility of the linker region, which adapts different conformations in the wild type dystrophin. Mutations T220V and G130D in dystrophin constrain the flexibility of the central helical region, while in the two known disease‐causing mutants, K18N and L54R, the helicity of the region is compromised. Phylogenetic tree and sequence analysis revealed that dystrophin and utrophin genes have probably originated from the same ancestor. The investigation would provide insight into the functional diversity of two closely related proteins and fimbrin, and contribute to our understanding of the mechanism of MDys. Proteins 2015; 83:696–710. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of?Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to?F-actin

Deficiency of the vital muscle protein dystrophin triggers Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy, but the structure-function relationship of dystrophin is poorly understood. To date, molecular structures of three dystrophin domains have been determined, of which the N-terminal actin-binding domain (N-ABD or ABD1) is of particular interest. This domain is composed of two calponin-homology (CH) domains, which form an important class of ABDs in muscle proteins. A previously determined x-ray structure indicates that the dystrophin N-ABD is a domain-swapped dimer, with each monomer adopting an extended, open conformation in which the two CH domains do not interact. This structure is controversial because it contradicts functional studies and known structures of similar ABDs from other muscle proteins. Here, we investigated the solution conformation of the dystrophin N-ABD using a very simple and elegant technique of pyrene excimer fluorescence. Using the wild-type protein, which contains two cysteines, and the corresponding single-cysteine mutants, we show that the protein is a monomer in solution and is in a closed conformation in which the two CH domains seem to interact, as observed from the excimer fluorescence of pyrene-labeled wild-type protein. Excimer fluorescence was also observed in its actin-bound form, indicating that the dystrophin N-ABD binds to F-actin in a closed conformation. Comparison of the dystrophin N-ABD conformation with other ABDs indicates that the tandem CH domains in general may be monomeric in solution and predominantly occur in closed conformation, whereas their actin-bound conformations may differ.     

Binding of dystrophin's tandem calponin homology domain to F-actin is modulated by actin's structure

Dystrophin has been shown to be associated in cells with actin bundles. Dys-246, an N-terminal recombinant protein encoding the first 246 residues of dystrophin, includes two calponin-homology (CH) domains, and is similar to a large class of F-actin cross-linking proteins including alpha-actinin, fimbrin, and spectrin. It has been shown that expression or microinjection of amino-terminal fragments of dystrophin or the closely related utrophin resulted in the localization of these protein domains to actin bundles. However, in vitro studies have failed to detect any bundling of actin by either intact dystrophin or Dys-246. We show here that the structure of F-actin can be modulated so that there are two modes of Dys-246 binding, from bundling actin filaments to only binding to single filaments. The changes in F-actin structure that allow Dys-246 to bundle filaments are induced by covalent modification of Cys-374, proteolytic cleavage of F-actin's C-terminus, mutation of yeast actin's N-terminus, and different buffers. The present results suggest that F-actin's structural state can have a large influence on the nature of actin's interaction with other proteins, and these different states need to be considered when conducting in vitro assays.     

Do the utrophin tandem calponin homology domains bind F-actin in a compact or extended conformation?

Tandem calponin-homology (CH) domains play an important role in the actin-binding function of many spectrin superfamily proteins. Crystal structures from several of these proteins have suggested a flexibility between these domains, and the manner in which these domains bind to F-actin has been the subject of some controversy. A recent paper has used electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction to examine the complex of the utrophin tandem CH domain with F-actin. In contrast to our previously published study, a closed conformation of the two calponin-homology domains was suggested in the new work. We show here that the new results can be explained by incomplete binding of utrophin to actin, heterogeneity in the mode of binding, and angular disorder in F-actin. We conclude that helical averaging applied to disordered filaments is responsible for their results, and that approaches designed to separate out homogeneous subsets within such filamentous complexes offer many advantages.     

The crystal structures of dystrophin and utrophin spectrin repeats: implications for domain boundaries

Dystrophin and utrophin link the F-actin cytoskeleton to the cell membrane via an associated glycoprotein complex. This functionality results from their domain organization having an N-terminal actin-binding domain followed by multiple spectrin-repeat domains and then C-terminal protein-binding motifs. Therapeutic strategies to replace defective dystrophin with utrophin in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy require full-characterization of both these proteins to assess their degree of structural and functional equivalence. Here the high resolution structures of the first spectrin repeats (N-terminal repeat 1) from both dystrophin and utrophin have been determined by x-ray crystallography. The repeat structures both display a three-helix bundle fold very similar to one another and to homologous domains from spectrin, α-actinin and plectin. The utrophin and dystrophin repeat structures reveal the relationship between the structural domain and the canonical spectrin repeat domain sequence motif, showing the compact structural domain of spectrin repeat one to be extended at the C-terminus relative to its previously defined sequence repeat. These structures explain previous in vitro biochemical studies in which extending dystrophin spectrin repeat domain length leads to increased protein stability. Furthermore we show that the first dystrophin and utrophin spectrin repeats have no affinity for F-actin in the absence of other domains.     

Evidence for a Conformational Change in Actin Induced by Fimbrin (N375) Binding

Fimbrin belongs to a superfamily of actin cross-linking proteins that share a conserved 27-kD actin-binding domain. This domain contains a tandem duplication of a sequence that is homologous to calponin. Calponin homology (CH) domains not only cross-link actin filaments into bundles and networks, but they also bind intermediate filaments and some signal transduction proteins to the actin cytoskeleton. This fundamental role of CH domains as a widely used actin-binding domain underlines the necessity to understand their structural interaction with actin. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we have determined the three-dimensional structure of F-actin and F-actin decorated with the NH₂-terminal CH domains of fimbrin (N375). In a difference map between actin filaments and N375-decorated actin, one end of N375 is bound to a concave surface formed between actin subdomains 1 and 2 on two neighboring actin monomers. In addition, a fit of the atomic model for the actin filament to the maps reveals the actin residues that line, the binding surface. The binding of N375 changes actin, which we interpret as a movement of subdomain 1 away from the bound N375. This change in actin structure may affect its affinity for other actin-binding proteins and may be part of the regulation of the cytoskeleton itself. Difference maps between actin and actin decorated with other proteins provides a way to look for novel structural changes in actin.     

Dystrophin and Utrophin Complexed with Different Associated Proteins in Cardiac Purkinje Fibres

Abnormal dystrophin expression is directly responsible for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. In skeletal muscle, dystrophin provides a link between the actin network and the extracellular matrix via the dystrophin-associated protein complex. In mature skeletal muscle, utrophin is a dystrophin-related protein localized mainly at the neuromuscular junction, with the same properties as dystrophin in terms of linking the protein complex. Utrophin could potentially overcome the absence of dystrophin in dystrophic skeletal muscles. In cardiac muscle, dystrophin and utrophin were both found to be present with a distinct subcellular distribution in Purkinje fibres, i.e. utrophin was limited to the cytoplasm, while dystrophin was located in the cytoplasmic membrane.In this study, we used this particular characteristic of cardiac Purkinje fibres and demonstrated that associated proteins of dystrophin and utrophin are different in this structure. We conclude, contrary to skeletal muscle, dystrophin-associated proteins do not form a complex in Purkinje fibres. In addition, we have indirect evidence of the presence of two different 400kDa dystrophins in Purkinje fibres.     

Thermodynamic stability, unfolding kinetics, and aggregation of the N-terminal actin-binding domains of utrophin and dystrophin

Muscular dystrophy (MD) is the most common genetic lethal disorder in children. Mutations in dystrophin trigger the most common form of MD, Duchenne, and its allelic variant Becker MD. Utrophin is the closest homologue and has been shown to compensate for the loss of dystrophin in human disease animal models. However, the structural and functional similarities and differences between utrophin and dystrophin are less understood. Both proteins interact with actin through their N-terminal actin-binding domain (N-ABD). In this study, we examined the thermodynamic stability and aggregation of utrophin N-ABD and compared with that of dystrophin. Our results show that utrophin N-ABD has spectroscopic properties similar to dystrophin N-ABD. However, utrophin N-ABD has decreased denaturant and thermal stability, unfolds faster, and is correspondingly more susceptible to proteolysis, which might account for its decreased in vivo half-life compared to dystrophin. In addition, utrophin N-ABD aggregates to a lesser extent compared with dystrophin N-ABD, contrary to the general behavior of proteins in which decreased stability enhances protein aggregation. Despite these differences in stability and aggregation, both proteins exhibit deleterious effects of mutations. When utrophin N-ABD mutations analogous in position to the dystrophin disease-causing mutations were generated, they behaved similarly to dystrophin mutants in terms of decreased stability and the formation of cross-β aggregates, indicating a possible role for utrophin mutations in disease mechanisms.     

Absence of utrophin in intercalated discs of human cardiac muscle

Utrophin is the autosomal homologue of dystrophin. In normal skeletal muscle it is localised only to neuromuscular and myotendinous junctions, nerves and vascular tissue. In Xp21 muscular dystrophies, utrophin is also detected on the sarcolemma of skeletal and cardiac muscle, while dystrophin is absent or reduced. In normal cardiac muscle, some reports have demonstrated utrophin at intercalated discs and T-tubules. We have re-examined the distribution of utrophin in normal human cardiac muscle using a panel of eight monoclonal antibodies against different epitopes in N- and C-terminal domains. In contrast to previous studies, utrophin was not detected at the intercalated discs or T-tubules, although labelling of blood vessels was strong. We conclude that the primary location of utrophin in normal heart is in the vascular system. In addition, our results show that the utrophin on cardiac blood vessels is full length, similar to that of skeletal muscle blood vessels.     

Crystal structure of the actin-binding domain of alpha-actinin 1: evaluating two competing actin-binding models

Alpha-actinin belongs to the spectrin family of actin crosslinking and bundling proteins that function as key regulators of cell motility, morphology and adhesion. The actin-binding domain (ABD) of these proteins consists of two consecutive calponin homology (CH) domains. Electron microscopy studies on ABDs appear to support two competing actin-binding models, extended and compact, whereas the crystal structures typically display a compact conformation. We have determined the 1.7A resolution structure of the ABD of alpha-actinin 1, a ubiquitously expressed isoform. The structure displays the classical compact conformation. We evaluated the two binding models by surface conservation analysis. The results show a conserved surface that spans both domains and corresponds to two previously identified actin-binding sites (ABS2 and ABS3). A third, and probably less important site, ABS1, is mostly buried in the compact conformation. However, a thorough examination of existing structures suggests a weak and semi-polar binding interface between the two CHs, leaving open the possibility of domain reorientation or opening. Our results are consistent with a two-step binding mechanism in which the ABD interacts first in the compact form observed in the structures, and then transitions toward a higher affinity state, possibly through minor rearrangement of the domains.