Chromium(III) bound to DNA templates promotes increased polymerase processivity and decreased fidelity during replication in vitro

Carcinogenic chromium [Cr(VI)] compounds are reduced intracellularly to DNA- and protein-reactive chromium(III) species. However, the role of Cr(III) ions in chromium-induced genotoxicity remains unclear. We have investigated the effects of chromium(III) binding on DNA replication and polymerase processivity in vitro. Chromium ions bind slowly and in a dose-dependent manner to DNA. Micromolar concentrations of free chromium inhibit DNA replication, but if the unbound chromium is removed by gel filtration, the rate of DNA replication by polymerase I (Klenow fragment) on the chromium-bound template is increased greater than 6-fold relative to the control. This increase is paralleled by as much as a 4-fold increase in processivity and a 2-fold decrease in replication fidelity. These effects are optimum when very low concentrations of chromium ions are bound to the DNA [3-4 Cr(III) ions per 1000 nucleotide phosphates]. Increased concentrations of chromium lead to the production of DNA-DNA cross-links and inhibition of polymerase activity. These results suggest that low levels of DNA-bound chromium(III) ions may contribute to chromium mutagenesis and carcinogenesis by altering the kinetics and fidelity of DNA replication.     

Fidelity and processivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta

The yeast RAD30 gene functions in error-free replication of UV-damaged DNA, and RAD30 encodes a DNA polymerase, pol eta, that has the ability to efficiently and correctly replicate past a cis-syn-thymine-thymine dimer in template DNA. To better understand the role of pol eta in damage bypass, we examined its fidelity and processivity on nondamaged DNA templates. Steady-state kinetic analyses of deoxynucleotide incorporation indicate that pol eta has a low fidelity, misincorporating deoxynucleotides with a frequency of about 10(-2) to 10(-3). Also pol eta has a low processivity, incorporating only a few nucleotides before dissociating. We suggest that pol eta's low fidelity reflects a flexibility in its active site rendering it more tolerant of DNA damage, while its low processivity limits its activity to reduce errors.     

Analysis of the stimulation of DNA polymerase V of Escherichia coli by processivity proteins

Bypass of replication-blocking lesions in Escherichia coli is carried out by DNA polymerase V (UmuC) in a reaction that requires UmuD', RecA, and single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB). The activity of this four-component basic bypass system is a low-fidelity and low-processivity activity. Addition of the processivity subunits of pol III, the beta subunit sliding DNA clamp, and the five-subunit gamma complex clamp loader increased the rate of translesion replication approximately 3-fold. This stimulation was specific to the lesion bypass step, with no effect on the initiation of synthesis by pol V. The beta subunit and gamma complex increased the processivity of pol V from 3 to approximately 14-18 nucleotides, providing a mechanistic basis for their stimulatory effect. Stimulation of bypass was observed over a range of RecA and SSB concentrations. ATPgammaS, which strongly inhibits translesion replication by pol V, primarily via inhibition of the initiation stage, caused the same inhibition also in the presence of the processivity proteins. The in vivo role of the processivity proteins in translesion replication was examined by assaying UV mutagenesis. This was done in a strain carrying the dnaN59 allele, encoding a temperature-sensitive beta subunit. When assayed in an excision repair-defective background, the dnaN59 mutant exhibited a level of UV mutagenesis reduced up to 3-fold compared to that of the isogenic dnaN(+) strain. This suggests that like in the in vitro system, the beta subunit stimulates lesion bypass in vivo.     

Coding properties of poly(deoxycytidylic acid) templates containing uracil or apyrimidinic sites: in vitro modulation of mutagenesis by deoxyribonucleic acid repair enzymes

Heat treatment of poly(deoxycytidylic acid)-[poly(dC)] induces the formation of dUMP residues, which code for dAMP when replicated by Escherichia coli DNA polymerases I and III. The specificity of dUMP coding properties is indicated by the quantitative relation between the dAMP incorporated and the frequency of dUMP residues in the heat-treated poly(dC). The dAMP incorporation is prevented by preincubation of uracil containing poly(dC) with uracil-DNA glycosylase. The excision of uracil by uracil-DNA glycosylase leads to the formation of apyrimidinic sites (AP sites), which are barely replicated in vitro under physiological conditions. However, the alteration of E. coli DNA polymerase I fidelity of replication by Mn2+ greatly stimulates the replication of AP sites. There is a preferential incorporation of dAMP, as compared to dTMP, opposite the AP sites. The dAMP incorporation is prevented by preincubation of poly(dC) containing AP sites with Micrococcus luteus AP endonuclease B. The results show a close association between DNA repair by base excision and the prevention of mutagenic processes in vitro. Furthermore, since the alteration of DNA polymerase fidelity allows some replication of the noncoding DNA lesion (AP site), this could imply a role in SOS-induced mutagenesis in vivo.     

Proofreading of DNA polymerase eta-dependent replication errors

Human DNA polymerase eta, the product of the skin cancer susceptibility gene XPV, bypasses UV photoproducts in template DNA that block synthesis by other DNA polymerases. Pol eta lacks an intrinsic proofreading exonuclease and copies DNA with low fidelity, such that pol eta errors could contribute to mutagenesis unless they are corrected. Here we provide evidence that pol eta can compete with other human polymerases during replication of duplex DNA, and in so doing it lowers replication fidelity. However, we show that pol eta has low processivity and extends mismatched primer termini less efficiently than matched termini. These properties could provide an opportunity for extrinsic exonuclease(s) to proofread pol eta-induced replication errors. When we tested this hypothesis during replication in human cell extracts, pol eta-induced replication infidelity was found to be modulated by changing the dNTP concentration and to be enhanced by adding dGMP to a replication reaction. Both effects are classical hallmarks of exonucleolytic proofreading. Thus, pol eta is ideally suited for its role in reducing UV-induced mutagenesis and skin cancer risk, in that its relaxed base selectivity may facilitate efficient bypass of UV photoproducts, while subsequent proofreading by extrinsic exonuclease(s) may reduce its mutagenic potential.     

Silencing of the gene coding for the epsilon subunit of DNA polymerase III slows down the growth rate of Escherichia coli populations

Chromosome replication in Escherichia coli is accomplished by the multimeric enzyme DNA polymerase III; the relevance, in vivo, of the epsilon subunit (encoded by dnaQ) for processivity and fidelity of DNA polymerase III has been evaluated. To this aim, dnaQ has been conditionally silenced by means of in vivo expression of different antisense RNAs. Unexpectedly, the presence of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence is essential for the effectiveness of antisense constructs. Silencing of dnaQ induces a severe decrease in growth rate not paralleled by high mutation frequencies, suggesting that the epsilon subunit primarily affects the processivity of DNA polymerase III.     

The processivity factor β controls DNA polymerase IV traffic during spontaneous mutagenesis and translesion synthesis in vivo

The dinB-encoded DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) belongs to the recently identified Y-family of DNA polymerases. Like other members of this family, Pol IV is involved in translesion synthesis and mutagenesis. Here, we show that the C-terminal five amino acids of Pol IV are essential in targeting it to the β-clamp, the processivity factor of the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol III) of Escherichia coli. In vivo, the disruption of this interaction obliterates the function of Pol IV in both spontaneous and induced mutagenesis. These results point to the pivotal role of the processivity clamp during DNA polymerase trafficking in the vicinity of damaged-template DNA.     

When pol I goes into high gear: processive DNA synthesis by pol I in the cell

Pol I is the most abundant polymerase in E. coli and plays an important role in short patch repair. In accord with this role in the cell, the purified polymerase exhibits low processivity and high fidelity in vitro. Pol I is also the polymerase responsible for leader strand synthesis during ColE1 plasmid replication. In a previous publication, we described the generation of a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I. Expression of this mutant Pol I results in errors during the replication of a ColE1 plasmid. The distribution and spectrum of mutations in the ColE1 plasmid sequence downstream the ori indicates that Pol I is capable of more processive replication in vivo than previously accepted. Here, we review evidence suggesting that Pol I may be recruited into a replisome-like holoenzyme and speculate that processive DNA replication by Pol I may play a role in recombination-dependent DNA replication in the cell.     

When Pol I Goes into High Gear: Processive DNA Synthesis by Pol I in the Cell

Pol I is the most abundant polymerase in E. coli and plays an important role in short patch repair. In accord with this role in the cell, the purified polymerase exhibits low processivity and high fidelity in vitro. Pol I is also the polymerase responsible for leader strand synthesis during ColE1 plasmid replication. In a previous publication, we described the generation of a highly error-prone DNA polymerase I. Expression of this mutant Pol I results in errors during the replication of a ColE1 plasmid. The distribution and spectrum of mutations in the ColE1 plasmid sequence downstream the ori indicates that Pol I is capable of more processive replication in vivo than previously accepted. Here, we review evidence suggesting that Pol I may be recruited into a replisome-like holoenzyme and speculate that processive DNA replication by Pol I in the cell may play a role in recombination-dependent DNA replication.     

Replication fidelity in E. coli: Differential leading and lagging strand effects for dnaE antimutator alleles

DNA Pol III holoenzyme (HE) is the major DNA replicase of Escherichia coli. It is a highly accurate enzyme responsible for simultaneously replicating the leading- and lagging DNA strands. Interestingly, the fidelity of replication for the two DNA strands is unequal, with a higher accuracy for lagging-strand replication. We have previously proposed this higher lagging-strand fidelity results from the more dissociative character of the lagging-strand polymerase. In support of this hypothesis, an E. coli mutant carrying a catalytic DNA polymerase subunit (DnaE915) characterized by decreased processivity yielded an antimutator phenotype (higher fidelity). The present work was undertaken to gain deeper insight into the factors that influence the fidelity of chromosomal DNA replication in E. coli. We used three different dnaE alleles (dnaE915, dnaE911, and dnaE941) that had previously been isolated as antimutators. We confirmed that each of the three dnaE alleles produced significant antimutator effects, but in addition showed that these antimutator effects proved largest for the normally less accurate leading strand. Additionally, in the presence of error-prone DNA polymerases, each of the three dnaE antimutator strains turned into mutators. The combined observations are fully supportive of our model in which the dissociative character of the DNA polymerase is an important determinant of in vivo replication fidelity. In this model, increased dissociation from terminal mismatches (i.e., potential mutations) leads to removal of the mismatches (antimutator effect), but in the presence of error-prone (or translesion) DNA polymerases the abandoned terminal mismatches become targets for error-prone extension (mutator effect). We also propose that these dnaE alleles are promising tools for studying polymerase exchanges at the replication fork.     

HeLa cell single-stranded DNA-binding protein increases the accuracy of DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase alpha in vitro.

To determine whether cellular replication factors can influence the fidelity of DNA replication, the effect of HeLa cell single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) on the accuracy of DNA replication by HeLa cell DNA polymerase alpha has been examined. An in vitro gap-filling assay, in which the single-stranded gap contains the supF target gene, was used to measure mutagenesis. Addition of SSB to the in vitro DNA synthesis reaction increased the accuracy of DNA polymerase alpha by 2- to 8-fold. Analysis of the products of DNA synthesis indicated that SSB reduces pausing by the polymerase at specific sites in the single-stranded supF template. Sequence analysis of the types of errors resulting from synthesis in the absence or presence of SSB reveals that, while the errors are primarily base substitutions under both conditions, SSB reduces the number of errors found at 3 hotspots in the supF gene. Thus, a cellular replication factor (SSB) can influence the fidelity of a mammalian DNA polymerase in vitro, suggesting that the high accuracy of cellular DNA replication may be determined in part by the interaction between replication factors, DNA polymerase and the DNA template in the replication complex.     

Fidelity of DNA replication under conditions used for oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis

The fidelity of DNA replication in vitro by DNA polymerase I (large subfragment) of Escherichia coli has been measured by the standard bioassay: single-stranded φX174 DNA (plus strand) containing an amber codon was primed with a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide, replicated and the frequency of point mutations formed in the synthetic minus strand of the resultant double-stranded DNA determined from the number of revertant phage produced in a spheroplast assay. Since the assay depends crucially on the frequency of expression of the mutations in the heteroduplex, and this can vary for a variety of reasons, parallel control experiments were performed using a primer that covered the amber codon but contained the same mismatch that occurred during replication. The frequency of expression of these mutations was found to vary from 40 to 100% in fully ligated heteroduplexes, depending upon the age and batch of spheroplasts used. The variation probably reflects the viability of the post-replicative mismatch repair enzymes in the spheroplasts used for transfection. Far lower frequencies of expression were found under conditions of poor replication. Accurate data and rate laws for fidelity are obtained only when the bioassay is normalized for the variation in the expression frequency.There is active proofreading by the 3′-5′-exonuclease activity of the polymerase of a misincorporation resulting from a dGTP: T mismatch. The contribution of proofreading to fidelity is low: accuracy is enhanced by a factor of less than 7 at the concentrations of dNTPs in vivo. The lower accuracy of Pol I than Pol III is due mainly to poorer proofreading, which is manifested in a lower “cost” of replication: only 0.7 to 1.7% of the dNTPs are turned over to dNMPs during replication compared with 6 to 13% for Pol III. The error rates measured for Pol I under conditions used for oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis are sufficiently low that extraneous errors should not be induced when the concentrations of dNTPs are balanced. However, even higher fidelity will be obtained using the lowest concentrations of dNTPs consistent with efficient replication (~20 μm). Highly unbalanced concentrations as used in pulsed labelling should be avoided.     

Analysis of unassisted translesion replication by the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme

DNA damage-induced mutations are formed when damaged nucleotides present in single-stranded DNA are replicated. We have developed a new method for the preparation of gapped plasmids containing site-specific damaged nucleotides, as model DNA substrates for translesion replication. Using these substrates, we show that the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme from Escherichia coli can bypass a synthetic abasic site analogue with high efficiency (30% bypass in 16 min), unassisted by other proteins. The theta and tau subunits of the polymerase were not essential for bypass. No bypass was observed when the enzyme was assayed on a synthetic 60-mer oligonucleotide carrying the same lesion, and bypass on a linear gapped plasmid was 3-4-fold slower than on a circular gapped plasmid. There was no difference in the bypass when standing-start and running-start replication were compared. A comparison of translesion replication by DNA polymerase I, DNA polymerase II, the DNA polymerase III core, and the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme clearly showed that the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme was by far the most effective in performing translesion replication. This was not only due to the high processivity of the pol III holoenzyme, because increasing the processivity of pol II by adding the gamma complex and beta subunit, did not increase bypass. These results support the model that SOS regulation was imposed on a fundamentally constitutive translesion replication reaction to achieve tight control of mutagenesis.     

The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polzeta and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The use of translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases to bypass DNA lesions during replication constitutes an important mechanism to restart blocked/stalled DNA replication forks. Because TLS polymerases generally have low fidelity on undamaged DNA, the cell must regulate the interaction of TLS polymerases with damaged versus undamaged DNA to maintain genome integrity. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint proteins Ddc1, Rad17, and Mec3 form a clamp-like structure (the 9-1-1 clamp) that has physical similarity to the homotrimeric sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen, which interacts with and promotes the processivity of the replicative DNA polymerases. In this work, we demonstrate both an in vivo and in vitro physical interaction between the Mec3 and Ddc1 subunits of the 9-1-1 clamp and the Rev7 subunit of the Polzeta TLS polymerase. In addition, we demonstrate that loss of Mec3, Ddc1, or Rad17 results in a decrease in Polzeta-dependent spontaneous mutagenesis. These results suggest that, in addition to its checkpoint signaling role, the 9-1-1 clamp may physically regulate Polzeta-dependent mutagenesis by controlling the access of Polzeta to damaged DNA.     

Mechanism of the E. coli tau processivity switch during lagging-strand synthesis

The E. coli replication machinery employs a beta clamp that tethers the polymerase to DNA, thus ensuring high processivity. The replicase also contains a processivity switch that dissociates the polymerase from its beta clamp. The switch requires the tau subunit of the clamp loader and is regulated by different DNA structures. At a primed site, the switch is "off." When the replicase reaches the downstream primer to form a nick, the switch is flipped, and tau ejects the polymerase from beta. This switch has high fidelity for completed synthesis, remaining "off" until just prior to incorporation of the last nucleotide and turning "on" only after addition of the last dNTP. These actions of tau are confined to its C-terminal region, which is located outside the clamp loading apparatus. Thus, this highly processive replication machine has evolved a mechanism to specifically counteract processivity at a defined time in the lagging-strand cycle.     

Exchange between Escherichia coli polymerases II and III on a processivity clamp

Escherichia coli has three DNA polymerases implicated in the bypass of DNA damage, a process called translesion synthesis (TLS) that alleviates replication stalling. Although these polymerases are specialized for different DNA lesions, it is unclear if they interact differently with the replication machinery. Of the three, DNA polymerase (Pol) II remains the most enigmatic. Here we report a stable ternary complex of Pol II, the replicative polymerase Pol III core complex and the dimeric processivity clamp, β. Single-molecule experiments reveal that the interactions of Pol II and Pol III with β allow for rapid exchange during DNA synthesis. As with another TLS polymerase, Pol IV, increasing concentrations of Pol II displace the Pol III core during DNA synthesis in a minimal reconstitution of primer extension. However, in contrast to Pol IV, Pol II is inefficient at disrupting rolling-circle synthesis by the fully reconstituted Pol III replisome. Together, these data suggest a β-mediated mechanism of exchange between Pol II and Pol III that occurs outside the replication fork.     

Fidelity and processivity of DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase kappa, the product of the human DINB1 gene

Mammalian DNA polymerase kappa (pol kappa), a member of the UmuC/DinB nucleotidyl transferase superfamily, has been implicated in spontaneous mutagenesis. Here we show that human pol kappa copies undamaged DNA with average single-base substitution and deletion error rates of 7 x 10(-3) and 2 x 10(-3), respectively. These error rates are high when compared to those of most other DNA polymerases. pol kappa also has unusual error specificity, producing a high proportion of T.CMP mispairs and deleting and adding non-reiterated nucleotides at extraordinary rates. Unlike other members of the UmuC/DinB family, pol kappa can processively synthesize chains of 25 or more nucleotides. This moderate processivity may reflect a contribution of C-terminal residues, which include two zinc clusters. The very low fidelity and moderate processivity of pol kappa is novel in comparison to any previously studied DNA polymerase, and is consistent with a role in spontaneous mutagenesis.     

Strand specificity of ribonucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, replication of both strands of genomic DNA is carried out by a single replicase—DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (pol III HE). However, in certain genetic backgrounds, the low-fidelity TLS polymerase, DNA polymerase V (pol V) gains access to undamaged genomic DNA where it promotes elevated levels of spontaneous mutagenesis preferentially on the lagging strand. We employed active site mutants of pol III (pol IIIα_S759N) and pol V (pol V_Y11A) to analyze ribonucleotide incorporation and removal from the E. coli chromosome on a genome-wide scale under conditions of normal replication, as well as SOS induction. Using a variety of methods tuned to the specific properties of these polymerases (analysis of lacI mutational spectra, lacZ reversion assay, HydEn-seq, alkaline gel electrophoresis), we present evidence that repair of ribonucleotides from both DNA strands in E. coli is unequal. While RNase HII plays a primary role in leading-strand Ribonucleotide Excision Repair (RER), the lagging strand is subject to other repair systems (RNase HI and under conditions of SOS activation also Nucleotide Excision Repair). Importantly, we suggest that RNase HI activity can also influence the repair of single ribonucleotides incorporated by the replicase pol III HE into the lagging strand.     

Tobacco proliferating cell nuclear antigen binds directly and stimulates both activity and processivity of ddNTP-sensitive mungbean DNA polymerase

PCNA is well known as a component of DNA replication system and plays important roles in multiple cellular pathways in addition to replication and repair. In this work we have demonstrated the physical and functional interaction between tobacco PCNA and mungbean ddNTP-sensitive DNA polymerase which shares many physicochemical properties with family X-DNA polymerases except with the moderately processive mode of nucleotide incorporation. We have shown here that recombinant PCNA binds directly to mungbean DNA polymerase as revealed in affinity chromatography, pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation approaches. In vitro DNA polymerase activity assay and processivity analyses indicated recombinant PCNA specifically stimulates both activity and processivity of mungbean DNA polymerase. These observations lead to interesting speculation about the functional significance of the ddNTP-sensitive enzyme in replication event in higher plants since the enzyme has been shown to be active and expressed at an elevated level during the endoreduplication stages in developing mungbean seeds.     

Distinct β‐clamp interactions govern the activities of the Y family PolIV DNA polymerase

The prototypic Y family DNA polymerase IV (PolIV) of Escherichia coli is involved in multiple replication‐associated processes including spontaneous mutagenesis, translesion synthesis (TLS), cell fitness, survival under stressful conditions and checkpoint like functions. It interacts physically and functionally with the replisome's β processivity clamp through the canonical PolIV C‐terminal peptide (CTP). A second interaction that involves a portion of the little finger (LF) domain of PolIV has been structurally described. Here we show that the LF–β interaction stabilizes the clamp–polymerase complex in vitro and is necessary for the access of PolIV to ongoing replication forks in vivo. However, in contrast to the CTP–β, the LF–β interaction is dispensable for the role of the polymerase in TLS. This discloses two independent modes of action for PolIV and, in turn, uncovers a novel way by which the cell may regulate the potentially deleterious effect of such low fidelity polymerases during replication.