Differential effects of adenosine A2a and A2b receptors on cardiac contractility

The mammalian myocardium expresses four adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes: A(1)AR, A(2a)AR, A(2b)AR, and A(3)AR. The A(1)AR is well known for its profound antiadrenergic effects, but the roles of other AR subtypes in modulating contractility remain inconclusive. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the direct and indirect effects of A(2a)AR and A(2b)AR on cardiac contractility. Experiments were conducted in paced, constant pressure-perfused isolated hearts from wild-type (WT), A(2a)AR knockout (KO), and A(2b)AR KO mice. The A(2a)AR agonist CGS-21680 did not alter basal contractility or β-adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol (Iso)-mediated positive inotropic responses, and Iso-induced effects were unaltered in A(2a)AR KO hearts. However, A(2a)AR gene ablation resulted in a potentiation of the antiadrenergic effects mediated by the A(1)AR agonist 2-chloro-N-cyclopentyladenosine. The nonselective AR agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine and the selective A(2b)AR agonist BAY 60-6583 induced coronary flow-independent increases in contractility, but BAY 60-6583 did not alter Iso-induced contractile responses. The A(1)AR antiadrenergic effect was not potentiated in A(2b)AR KO hearts. The expression of all four AR subtypes in the heart and ventricular myocytes was confirmed using real-time quantitative PCR. Taken together, these results indicate that A(2a)AR does not increase cardiac contractility directly but indirectly alters contractility by modulating the A(1)AR antiadrenergic effect, whereas A(2b)AR exerts direct contractile effects but does not alter β-adrenergic or A(1)AR antiadrenergic effects. These results indicate that multiple ARs differentially modulate cardiac function.     

Expression of adenosine receptors in cardiac fibroblasts as a function of insulin and glucose level

Adenosine among other factors is known to regulate the growth and function of cardiac fibroblasts (CFs). Its action is mediated by cell-surface receptors linked to a variety of signaling systems. The goal of present work was to examine the effects of glucose and insulin on adenosine receptors (ARs) mRNA and protein level in primary culture of rat CFs by means of real-time PCR and Western blot. Elevated glucose level increased the expression of A(1)-AR, A(2A)-AR, decreased the expression of A(3)-AR, and had no effect on A(2B)-AR expression. On the other hand insulin suppressed the expression of A(1)-AR, and A(2B)-AR, and had no effect on A(2A)-AR and A(3)-AR expression. Our measurements showed that accumulation of cAMP in response to ARs agonists correlated well with the changes in receptors expression level. These results indicate that changes in glucose and insulin level independently and differentially regulate the ARs expression and functional state in CFs.     

Functional striatal hypodopaminergic activity in mice lacking adenosine A(2A) receptors.

Adenosine and caffeine modulate locomotor activity and striatal gene expression, partially through the activation and blockade of striatal A(2A) receptors, respectively. The elucidation of the roles of these receptors benefits from the construction of A(2A) receptor-deficient mice (A(2A)-R(-/-)). These mice presented alterations in locomotor behaviour and striatal expression of genes studied so far, which are unexpected regarding the specific expression of A(2A) receptor by striatopallidal neurones. To clarify the functions of A(2A) receptors in the striatum and to identify the mechanisms leading to these unexpected modifications, we studied the basal expression of immediate early and constitutive genes as well as dopamine and glutamate neurotransmission in the striatum. Basal zif268 and arc mRNAs expression was reduced in mutant mice by 60-80%, not only in the striatum but also widespread in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Striatal expression of substance P and enkephalin mRNAs was reduced by about 50% and 30%, respectively, whereas the expression of GAD67 and GAD65 mRNAs was slightly increased and unaltered, respectively. In vivo microdialysis in the striatum revealed a 45% decrease in the extracellular dopamine concentration and three-fold increase in extracellular glutamate concentration. This was associated with an up-regulation of D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors expression but not with changes in ionotropic glutamate receptors. The levels of tyrosine hydroxylase and of striatal and cortical glial glutamate transporters as well as adenosine A(1) receptors expression were indistinguishable between A(2A)-R(-/-) and wild-type mice. Altogether these results pointed out that the lack of A(2A) receptors leads to a functional hypodopaminergic state and demonstrated that A(2A) receptors are necessary to maintain a basal level in immediate early and constitutive genes expression in the striatum and cerebral cortex, possibly via their control of dopamine pathways.     

Contractile effects of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in isolated murine hearts

The adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) inhibits beta-adrenergic-induced contractile effects (antiadrenergic action), and the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) both opposes the A1R action and enhances contractility in the heart. This study investigated the A1R and A2AR function in beta-adrenergic-stimulated, isolated wild-type and A2AR knockout murine hearts. Constant flow and pressure perfused preparations were employed, and the maximal rate of left ventricular pressure (LVP) development (+dp/dt(max)) was used as an index of cardiac function. A1R activation with 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) resulted in a 27% reduction in contractile response to the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol (ISO). Stimulation of A2AR with 2-P(2-carboxyethyl)phenethyl-amino-5'-N-ethylcarboxyamidoadenosine (CGS-21680) attenuated this antiadrenergic effect, resulting in a partial (constant flow preparation) or complete (constant pressure preparation) restoration of the ISO contractile response. These effects of A2AR were absent in knockout hearts. Up to 63% of the A2AR influence was estimated to be mediated through its inhibition of the A1R antiadrenergic effect, with the remainder being the direct contractile effect. Further experiments examined the effects of A2AR activation and associated vasodilation with low-flow ischemia in the absence of beta-adrenergic stimulation. A2AR activation reduced by 5% the depression of contractile function caused by the flow reduction and also increased contractile performance over a wide range of perfusion flows. This effect was prevented by the A2AR antagonist 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol (ZM-241385). It is concluded that in the murine heart, A1R and A2AR modulate the response to beta-adrenergic stimulation with A2AR, attenuating the effects of A1R and also increasing contractility directly. In addition, A2AR supports myocardial contractility in a setting of low-flow ischemia.     

Targeted deletion of A2A adenosine receptors attenuates the protective effects of myocardial postconditioning

Endogenous adenosine is an important ligand trigger for the cardioprotective effects of postconditioning (POC), yet it is unclear which adenosine receptor subtype is primarily responsible. To evaluate the role of A(2A) adenosine receptors in POC-induced protection, global ischemia-reperfusion was performed with and without POC in isolated wild-type (WT) and A(2A) adenosine receptor knockout (A(2A)KO) mouse hearts. Injury was measured in terms of postischemic functional recovery and release of cardiac troponin I (cTnI). Activation of protective signaling with POC was assessed by Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 phosphorylation. In WT hearts, POC improved recovery of postischemic developed pressure in early (81.6 +/- 6.4% of preischemic baseline vs. 37.5 +/- 5.6% for non-POC WT at 1 min) and late (62.2 +/- 4.2% of baseline vs. 45.5 +/- 5.3% for non-POC WT at 30 min) reperfusion, reduced cTnI release by 37%, and doubled the phosphorylation of both Akt and ERK1/2. These beneficial effects of POC were blocked by treatment with the selective A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonist ZM-241385 during reperfusion. Postischemic functional recovery, cTnI release, and phosphorylation of Akt and ERK1/2 were not different between non-POC WT and A(2A)KO hearts. In A(2A)KO hearts, POC did not improve functional recovery, reduce cTnI release, nor increase phosphorylation of Akt or ERK1/2. Thus the protective effects of POC are attenuated by both selective A(2A) receptor antagonism and targeted deletion of the gene encoding A(2A) adenosine receptors. These observations support the conclusion that endogenous activation of A(2A) adenosine receptors is an essential trigger leading to the protective effects of POC in isolated murine hearts.     

Involvement of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors on guanosine-mediated anti-tremor effects in reserpinized mice

Parkinson’s disease (PD) signs and symptoms regularly include tremor. Interestingly, the nucleoside guanosine (GUO) has already proven to be effective in reducing reserpine-induced tremulous jaw movements (TJMs) in rodent models, thus becoming a promising antiparkinsonian drug. Here, we aimed at revealing the mechanism behind GUO antiparkinsonian efficacy by assessing the role of adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors (A₁R and A_2AR) on GUO-mediated anti-tremor effects in the reserpinized mouse model of PD. Reserpinized mice showed elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and cellular membrane damage in striatal slices assessed ex vivo and GUO treatment reversed ROS production. Interestingly, while the simultaneous administration of sub-effective doses of GUO (5 mg/kg) and SCH58261 (0.01 mg/kg), an A_2AR antagonist, precluded reserpine-induced TJMs, these were ineffective on reverting ROS production in ex vivo experiments. Importantly, GUO was able to reduce TJM and ROS production in reserpinized mouse lacking the A_2AR, thus suggesting an A_2AR-independent mechanism of GUO-mediated effects. Conversely, the administration of DPCPX (0.75 mg/kg), an A₁R antagonist, completely abolished both GUO-mediated anti-tremor effects and blockade of ROS production. Overall, these results indicated that GUO anti-tremor and antioxidant effects in reserpinized mice were A₁R dependent but A_2AR independent, thus suggesting a differential participation of adenosine receptors in GUO-mediated effects.

     

Activated cardiac adenosine A(1) receptors translocate out of caveolae

The cardiac affects of the purine nucleoside, adenosine, are well known. Adenosine increases coronary blood flow, exerts direct negative chronotropic and dromotropic effects, and exerts indirect anti-adrenergic effects. These effects of adenosine are mediated via the activation of specific G protein-coupled receptors. There is increasing evidence that caveolae play a role in the compartmentalization of receptors and second messengers in the vicinity of the plasma membrane. Several reports demonstrate that G protein-coupled receptors redistribute to caveolae in response to receptor occupation. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that adenosine A(1) receptors would translocate to caveolae in the presence of agonists. Surprisingly, in unstimulated rat cardiac ventricular myocytes, 67 +/- 5% of adenosine A(1) receptors were isolated with caveolae. However, incubation with the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist 2-chlorocyclopentyladenosine induced the rapid translocation of the A(1) receptors from caveolae into non-caveolae plasma membrane, an effect that was blocked by the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine. An adenosine A(2a) receptor agonist did not alter the localization of A(1) receptors to caveolae. These data suggest that the translocation of A(1) receptors out of caveolae and away from compartmentalized signaling molecules may explain why activation of ventricular myocyte A(1) receptors are associated with few direct effects.     

Expression of A1 adenosine receptors in the developing avian retina: in vivo modulation by A2A receptors and endogenous adenosine

Little is known about the mechanisms that regulate the expression of adenosine receptors during CNS development. We demonstrate here that retinas from chick embryos injected in ovo with selective adenosine receptor ligands show changes in A1 receptor expression after 48 h. Exposure to A1 agonist N⁶‐cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) or antagonist 8‐Cyclopentyl‐1, 3‐dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) reduced or increased, respectively, A1 receptor protein and [³H]DPCPX binding, but together, CHA+DPCPX had no effect. Interestingly, treatment with A_2A agonist 3‐[4‐[2‐[[6‐amino‐9‐[(2R,3R,4S,5S)‐5‐(ethylcarbamoyl)‐3,4‐dihydroxy‐oxolan‐2‐yl]purin‐2‐yl]amino] ethyl]phenyl] propanoic acid (CGS21680) increased A1 receptor protein and [³H]DPCPX binding, and reduced A_2A receptors. The A_2A antagonists 7‐(2‐phenylethyl)‐5‐amino‐2‐(2‐furyl)‐pyrazolo‐[4,3‐e]‐1,2,4‐trizolo[1,5‐c] pyrimidine (SCH58261) and 4‐(2‐[7‐amino‐2‐[2‐furyl][1,2,4]triazolo[2,3‐a][1,3,5]triazo‐5‐yl‐amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM241385) had opposite effects on A1 receptor expression. Exposure to CGS21680 + CHA did not change A1 receptor levels, whereas CHA + ZM241385 or CGS21680 + DPCPX had no synergic effect. The blockade of adenosine transporter with S‐(4‐nitrobenzyl)‐6‐thioinosine (NBMPR) also reduced [³H]DPCPX binding, an effect blocked by DPCPX, but not enhanced by ZM241385. [³H]DPCPX binding kinetics showed that treatment with CHA reduced and CGS21680 increased the Bmax, but did not affect Kd values. CHA, DPCPX, CGS21680, and ZM241385 had no effect on A1 receptor mRNA. These data demonstrated an in vivo regulation of A1 receptor expression by endogenous adenosine or long‐term treatment with A1 and A_2A receptors modulators.     

Location of adenosine release and adenosine A2 receptors to rat striatal neurons

Three types of striatal lesions were performed to determine the site of adenosine synthesis and release and the location of adenosine A2 receptors: decortication; injection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the median forebrain bundle; and injection of kainic acid into the striatum. The parameters measured in the striatum were content of adenosine, activation of adenylate cyclase by N⁶-(L-phenylisopropyl) adenosine (PIA) and release of endogenous adenosine from a perfused slice. Decortication and 6-OHDA had only minimal affects on the parameters measured. In contrast, kainic acid injection into the striatum decreased the content of adenosine, the release of adenosine from a slice preparation and diminished the ability of PIA to activate adenylate cyclase. We postulate that neurons which synthesize and release adenosine, originate in the striatum. The adenosine receptors appear to be of the adenosine A2 type and they may be located on adjacent neurons or on the adenosine releasing neurons themselves.     

Oligomerization of adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors in living cells

We investigated whether oligomerization of adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R) and dopamine D(2) receptor (D(2)R) exists in living cells using modified bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET(2)) technology. Fusion of these receptors to a donor, Renilla luciferase (Rluc), and to an acceptor, modified green fluorescent protein (GFP(2)), did not affect the ligand binding affinity, subcellular distribution, and coimmunoprecipitation of the receptors. BRET was detected not only between Myc-D(2)R-Rluc and A(2A)R-GFP(2) but also between HA-tagged A(2A)R-Rluc and A(2A)R-GFP(2). These results indicate A(2A)R, either homomeric or heteromeric with D(2)R, exists as an oligomer in living cells.     

Transgenic overexpression of cardiac A(1) adenosine receptors mimics ischemic preconditioning

The role of A(1) adenosine receptors (A(1)AR) in ischemic preconditioning was investigated in isolated crystalloid-perfused wild-type and transgenic mouse hearts with increased A(1)AR. The effect of preconditioning on postischemic myocardial function, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and infarct size was examined. Functional recovery was greater in transgenic versus wild-type hearts (44.8 +/- 3.4% baseline vs. 25.6 +/- 1.7%). Preconditioning improved functional recovery in wild-type hearts from 25.6 +/- 1.7% to 37.4 +/- 2.2% but did not change recovery in transgenic hearts (44.8 +/- 3.4% vs. 44.5 +/- 3.9%). In isovolumically contracting hearts, pretreatment with selective A(1) receptor antagonist 1, 3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine attenuated the improved functional recovery in both wild-type preconditioned (74.2 +/- 7.3% baseline rate of pressure development over time untreated vs. 29.7 +/- 7.3% treated) and transgenic hearts (84.1 +/- 12.8% untreated vs. 42.1 +/- 6.8% treated). Preconditioning wild-type hearts reduced LDH release (from 7,012 +/- 1,451 to 1,691 +/- 1,256 U. l(-1). g(-1). min(-1)) and infarct size (from 62.6 +/- 5.1% to 32.3 +/- 11.5%). Preconditioning did not affect LDH release or infarct size in hearts overexpressing A(1)AR. Compared with wild-type hearts, A(1)AR overexpression markedly reduced LDH release (from 7,012 +/- 1,451 to 917 +/- 1,123 U. l(-1). g(-1). min(-1)) and infarct size (from 62.6 +/- 5.1% to 6.5 +/- 2.1%). These data demonstrate that murine preconditioning involves endogenous activation of A(1)AR. The beneficial effects of preconditioning and A(1)AR overexpression are not additive. Taken with the observation that A(1)AR blockade equally eliminates the functional protection resulting from both preconditioning and transgenic A(1)AR overexpression, we conclude that the two interventions affect cardioprotection via common mechanisms or pathways.     

Neutrophil adherence to endothelium is enhanced via adenosine A1 receptors and inhibited via adenosine A2 receptors.

We have recently demonstrated that human neutrophils (PMN) possess two different classes of adenosine receptors (A1 and A2) that, when occupied, promote chemotaxis and inhibit the generation of reactive oxygen species (e.g., O2- and H2O2), respectively. We have previously demonstrated that adenosine protects endothelial cells (EC) from injury by stimulated neutrophils (PMN) both by diminishing generation of H2O2 and inhibiting adherence of PMN to EC. We therefore determined whether occupancy of A1 or A2 adenosine receptors regulated adherence of PMN to EC. At concentrations similar to those required to inhibit release of O2- by ligation of A2 receptors, both adenosine (IC50 = 56 nM) and 5'N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA, IC50 = 8 nM), the most potent A2 agonist, inhibited adherence to EC by stimulated PMN (FMLP, 0.1 microM). In direct contrast, the specific A1 agonists N6-phenylisopropyladenosine and N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) promoted PMN adherence to EC at concentrations of 1-100 nM. To further investigate the mechanisms by which adenosine receptor agonists affected the adherence of stimulated PMN we examined the effect of NECA (A2) and CPA (A1) on the adherence of PMN to fibrinogen (a ligand for the beta 2 integrin CD11b/CD18) and to gelatin. In a dose-dependent manner (IC50 = 2 nM), NECA inhibited the adherence of FMLP-treated PMN to fibrinogen- but not gelatin-coated plates. In contrast, CPA (A1) promoted adherence of stimulated PMN to gelatin-(EC50 = 13 pM) but not fibrinogen-coated plates. Theophylline (10 microM), an adenosine receptor antagonist, reversed the inhibition by NECA (0.3 microM) of stimulated neutrophil adherence to fibrinogen. These observations not only confirm the presence of A1 and A2 receptors on PMN but also suggest two opposing roles for adenosine in inflammation. Occupancy of A1 receptors promotes neutrophil adherence to endothelium and chemotaxis (a proinflammatory role) whereas occupancy of A2 receptors inhibits adherence and generation of toxic oxygen metabolites (an antiinflammatory role).     

腺苷A2A受体在小鼠颅脑创伤与外周组织损伤模型中的作用差异

本文旨在探索腺苷A2A受体在颅脑创伤、皮肤创伤及放射损伤复合创伤中的作用差异.分别观察和检测野生型小鼠、A2A受体基因敲除小鼠以及给予A2A受体激动剂CGS21680治疗的小鼠在皮肤创伤、放射损伤复合创伤后的伤口愈合时间以及颅脑创伤后的神经功能缺损情况、伤侧皮层脑含水量、脑脊液中谷氨酸浓度.结果表明,CGS21680促进外周组织伤口愈合,却加重颅脑创伤模型的神经功能损害,这与其促进谷氨酸释放有关.相反,A2A受体基因敲除显著延迟小鼠皮肤创伤及放射损伤复合创伤模型的伤口愈合,而在颅脑创伤模型中通过抑制谷氨酸释放产生保护效应.本研究初步证实,A2A受体激活促进谷氨酸大量释放可能是其在中枢损伤与外周损伤产生作用差异的机理之一,这为将来临床应用A2A受体激动剂减轻外周损伤,而用A2A受体拈抗剂减轻颅脑损伤提供了一定的实验依据.     

Agonist derived molecular probes for A2 adenosine receptors

The adenosine agonist 2-(4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino)-5'-N- ethylcarboxamidoadenos ine (CGS21680) was recently reported to be selective for the A2 adenosine receptor subtype, which mediates its hypotensive action. To investigate structure/activity relationships at a distal site, CGS21680 was derivatized using a functionalized congener approach. The carboxylic group of CGS21680 has been esterified to form a methyl ester, which was then treated with ethylenediamine to produce an amine congener. The amine congener was an intermediate for acylation reactions, in which the reactive acyl species contained a reported group, or the precursor for such. For radioiodination, derivatives of p-hydroxyphenylpropionic, 2-thiophenylacetic, and p-aminophenylacetic acids were prepared. The latter derivative (PAPA-APEC) was iodinated electrophilically using [125I]iodide resulting in a radioligand which was used for studies of competition of binding to striatal A2 adenosine receptors in bovine brain. A biotin conjugate and an aryl sulfonate were at least 350-fold selective for A2 receptors. For spectroscopic detection, a derivative of the stable free radical tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO) was prepared. For irreversible inhibition of receptors, meta- and para-phenylenediisothiocyanate groups were incorporated in the analogs. We have demonstrated that binding at A2 receptors is relatively insensitive to distal structural changes at the 2-position, and we report high affinity molecular probes for receptor characterization by radioactive, spectroscopic and affinity labelling methodology.     

Coaggregation, cointernalization, and codesensitization of adenosine A2A receptors and dopamine D2 receptors

Antagonistic and reciprocal interactions are known to exist between adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum. In the present study, double immunofluorescence experiments with confocal laser microscopy showed a high degree of colocalization of adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)R) and dopamine D(2) receptors (D(2)R) in cell membranes of SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with human D(2)R and in cultured striatal cells. A(2A)R/D(2)R heteromeric complexes were demonstrated in coimmunoprecipitation experiments in membrane preparations from D(2)R-transfected SH-SY5Y cells and from mouse fibroblast Ltk(-) cells stably transfected with human D(2)R (long form) and transiently cotransfected with the A(2A)R double-tagged with hemagglutinin. Long term exposure to A(2A)R and D(2)R agonists in D(2)R-cotransfected SH-SY5Y cells resulted in coaggregation, cointernalization and codesensitization of A(2A)R and D(2)R. These results give a molecular basis for adenosine-dopamine antagonism at the membrane level and have implications for treatment of Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia, in which D(2)R are involved.     

Hetero-oligomerization of adenosine A1 receptors with P2Y1 receptors in rat brains

Adenosine and ATP modulate cellular and tissue functions via specific P1 and P2 receptors, respectively. Although, in general, adenosine inhibits excitability and ATP functions as an excitatory transmitter in the central nervous system, little is known about the direct interaction between P1 and P2 receptors. We recently demonstrated that the G(i/o)-coupled adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) and G(q/11)-coupled P2Y1 receptor (P2Y1R) form a heteromeric complex with a unique pharmacology in cotransfected HEK293T cells using the coimmunoprecipitation of differentially epitope-tagged forms of the receptor [Yoshioka et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 7617-7622], although it remained to be determined whether this hetero-oligomerization occurs in vivo. In the present study, we first demonstrated a high degree of colocalization of A1R and P2Y1R by double immunofluorescence experiments with confocal laser microscopy in rat cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum in addition to primary cultures of cortical neurons. Then, a direct association of A1R with P2Y1R was shown in coimmunoprecipitation studies using membrane extracts from these regions of rat brain. Together, these results suggest the widespread colocalization of A1R and P2Y1R in rat brain, and both receptors can exist in the same neuron, and therefore associate as hetero-oligomeric complexes in the rat brain.     

Definition of subclasses of adenosine receptors associated with adenylate cyclase: interaction of adenosine analogs with inhibitory A1 receptors and stimulatory A2 receptors

The structure-activity relationships of 63 adenosine analogs as agonists for the A1 adenosine receptors that mediate inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity in rat fat cells and for the A2 adenosine receptors that mediate stimulation of adenylate cyclase in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells and human platelets were determined. The lack of correspondence between the structure-activity relationships of these analogs at the A1 and A2 receptors appear definitive in terms of establishing the existence of A1 and A2 subclasses of adenosine receptors. However, significant differences in the agonist profiles at A2 receptors of platelet and PC12 indicate a certain degree of structural heterogeneity within the members of the A2 adenosine receptor subclass. Whether such differences are due to different species or different cell types is not known. A set of adenosine analogs, such as N6-cyclohexyl-, N6-R-, and S-1-phenyl-2- propyladenosines, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine and its N6-cyclohexyl derivative, 2-chloroadenosine, and 2-phenylaminoadenosine, appear to represent a series of analogs useful for pharmacological characterization of A1 and A2 classes of adenosine receptors.     

Identification of zebrafish A2 adenosine receptors and expression in developing embryos

The A2A adenosine receptor (AdR) subtype has emerged as an attractive target in the pursuit of improved therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD). This report focuses on characterization of zebrafish a2 AdRs. By mining the zebrafish EST and genomic sequence databases, we identified two zebrafish a2a (adora2a.1 and adora2a.2) genes and one a2b (adora2b) AdR gene. Sequence comparisons indicate that the predicted zebrafish A2 AdR polypeptides share 62–74% amino acid identity to mammalian A2 AdRs. We mapped the adora2a.1 gene to chromosome 8, the adora2a.2 gene to chromosome 21, and the adora2b gene to chromosome 5. Whole mount in situ hybridization analysis indicates zebrafish a2 AdR genes are expressed primarily within the central nervous system (CNS). Zebrafish are known to be sensitive to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), a neurotoxin that causes selective loss of dopaminergic neurons and PD-like symptoms in humans as well as in animal models. Here we show that caffeine, an A2A AdR antagonist, is neuroprotective against the adverse effects of MPTP in zebrafish embryos. These results suggest that zebrafish AdRs may serve as useful targets for testing novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of PD.