N- and C-terminal domains determine differential nucleosomal binding geometry and affinity of linker histone isotypes H1(0) and H1c

Eukaryotic linker or H1 histones modulate DNA compaction and gene expression in vivo. In mammals, these proteins exist as multiple isotypes with distinct properties, suggesting a functional significance to the heterogeneity. Linker histones typically have a tripartite structure composed of a conserved central globular domain flanked by a highly variable short N-terminal domain and a longer highly basic C-terminal domain. We hypothesized that the variable terminal domains of individual subtypes contribute to their functional heterogeneity by influencing chromatin binding interactions. We developed a novel dual color fluorescence recovery after photobleaching assay system in which two H1 proteins fused to spectrally separable fluorescent proteins can be co-expressed and their independent binding kinetics simultaneously monitored in a single cell. This approach was combined with domain swap and point mutagenesis to determine the roles of the terminal domains in the differential binding characteristics of the linker histone isotypes, mouse H1(0) and H1c. Exchanging the N-terminal domains between H1(0) and H1c changed their overall binding affinity to that of the other variant. In contrast, switching the C-terminal domains altered the chromatin interaction surface of the globular domain. These results indicate that linker histone subtypes bind to chromatin in an intrinsically specific manner and that the highly variable terminal domains contribute to differences between subtypes. The methods developed in this study will have broad applications in studying dynamic properties of additional histone subtypes and other mobile proteins.     

Origin of H1 linker histones.

In which taxa did H1 linker histones appear in the course of evolution? Detailed comparative analysis of the histone H1 and histone H1-related sequences available to date suggests that the origin of histone H1 can be traced to bacteria. The data also reveal that the sequence corresponding to the 'winged helix' motif of the globular structural domain, a domain characteristic of all metazoan histone H1 molecules, is evolutionarily conserved and appears separately in several divergent lines of protists. Some protists, however, appear to have only a lysine-rich basic protein, which has compositional similarity to some of the histone H1-like proteins from eubacteria and to the carboxy-terminal domain of the H1 linker histones from animals and plants. No lysine-rich basic proteins have been described in archaebacteria. The data presented in this review provide the surprising conclusion that whereas DNA-condensing H1-related histones may have arisen early in evolution in eubacteria, the appearance of the sequence motif corresponding to the globular domain of metazoan H1s occurred much later in the protists, after and independently of the appearance of the chromosomal core histones in archaebacteria.     

Histone H1 and chromatin higher order structure. Does histone H1 exhibit specific self-association?

1. Histones H1 and H5 in chromatin and in free solution can be cross-linked to higher multimers. Is this due to a specific protein/protein interaction? If so, this interaction might be the structural basis of the condensation of the chromosomal nucleofilament, known to be mediated by histones H1 and H5. 2. Since only the central domain of H1 and H5 exhibits tertiary folding and globular structure, this is the most likely site of specific interaction. 3. Formaldehyde has been used to test whether the central domains of histone H1 from calf thymus or from sea urchin sperm or histone H5 from chicken erythrocytes self-interact. 4. The cross-linking shown by each globular peptide was compared with that of its parent histone. 5. In all three cases the peptide cross-linked to a much lower extent than its intact parent histone and the observed cross-linked rates were roughly in proportion to the relative number of lysine residues parent histone and peptide. 6. It is concluded that there is no specific self-interaction between the globular domains of either H1 or H5 molecules in free solution. 7. This result suggests that specific H1/H1 protein/protein interactions are not the basic cause of chromatin condensation.     

A K52Q substitution in the globular domain of histone H1t modulates its nucleosome binding properties

A comparison of the globular domain sequences of the somatic H1d and testis-specific H1t revealed a single substitution of lysine 52 in H1d to glutamine 54 in H1t, which is one of the three crucial residues within the second DNA binding site. The globular domains of both histones were modeled using the crystal structure of chicken GH5 as a template and was also docked onto the nucleosome structure. The glutamine residue in histone H1t forms a hydrogen bond with main chain carbonyl of methionine-52 (in H1t) and is spatially oriented away from the nucleosome dyad axis. A consequence of this change was a lower affinity of recombinant histone H1t towards Four-way junction DNA and reconstituted 5S mononucleosomes. When Gln-54 in Histone H1t was mutated to lysine, its binding affinity towards DNA substrates was comparable to that of histone H1d. The differential binding of histones H1d and H1t towards reconstituted mononucleosomes was also reflected in the chromatosome-stop assay.     

Distinction and similarity in the structure of histones H1 and H5 as indicated by 13C nuclear-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy

The 13C nuclear magnetic resonance studies have been carried out on histones H1 and H5, by focusing our interest on possible formation of specific salt bridges between acidic and basic amino acid residues in the proteins and also on the structural difference between the two proteins. The 13C chemical shift and pKa values of the carboxyl group of glutamic acid residues in the histones coincided with those of free glutamic acid. Based on this result and another experiment using completely modified lysine residues in the histones, no evidence for a specific interaction between acidic and basic residues has been found. It has also been shown that the pH-effects of aliphatic and aromatic resonances are quite different between H1 and H5, suggesting that the globular domain of H5 is more stable than that of H1. The correlation time (1.5 ns) for the alpha-carbons of H5 estimated from 13C nuclear Overhauser enhancement was twice as long as that of H1 (0.9 ns), indicating that the backbone in the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of H5 is less mobile than that of H1.     

H1 family histones in the nucleus. Control of binding and localization by the C-terminal domain

H1 histones bind to DNA as they enter and exit the nucleosome. H1 histones have a tripartite structure consisting of a short N-terminal domain, a highly conserved central globular domain, and a lysine-and arginine-rich C-terminal domain. The C-terminal domain comprises approximately half of the total amino acid content of the protein, is essential for the formation of compact chromatin structures, and contains the majority of the amino acid variations that define the individual histone H1 family members. This region contains several cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation sites and is thought to function through a charge-neutralization process, neutralizing the DNA phosphate backbone to allow chromatin compaction. In this study, we use fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to define the behavior of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo. We find that there are dramatic differences in the binding affinity of the individual histone H1 subtypes in vivo and differences in their preference for euchromatin and heterochromatin. Further, we show that subtype-specific properties originate with the C terminus and that the differences in histone H1 binding are not consistent with the relatively small changes in the net charge of the C-terminal domains.     

Phosphorylation at clustered -Ser-Pro-X-Lys/Arg- motifs in sperm-specific histones H1 and H2B.

Sea urchin sperm-specific histones H1 and H2B have distinctive N-terminal, and in the case of H1 also C-terminal, domains containing repeats of a basic motif (-Ser-Pro-Lys/Arg-Lys/Arg- or a closely related sequence). The histones in spermatids (the precursors of sperm) are phosphorylated, and the unphosphorylated histones of mature sperm are rephosphorylated upon fertilization. These changes correlate with finely tuned changes in chromatin packing in the nucleus, and the domains responsible are evidently the N-terminal domains. We show that in spermatids there are six tandemly repeated phosphorylation sites in the N-terminal domain of H1 (a typical cAMP dependent protein kinase site is not phosphorylated) and that H2B is phosphorylated in the N-terminal domain at two or three sites in the case of H2B1 and four sites in H2B2. The consensus sequence for phosphorylation is -Ser-Pro-X-Lys/Arg-, where X is Thr, Gln, Lys or Arg. There is an additional phosphorylated site in the C-terminal domain of H1 but most (or possibly all) copies of the consensus motif, which are here dispersed, are not phosphorylated. The negative charge introduced upon phosphorylation would be expected to weaken or abolish electrostatic interaction with DNA of this motif, which also occurs, and is phosphorylated, in somatic H1s.     

The carboxyl-terminal domain of murine H1(0). Immunochemical and partial amino acid sequence comparisons with other H1(0)/H1/H5 histones

The carboxyl-terminal domain of murine H1(0) histone was compared with that of human H1(0), bovine H1(0) and other H1 and H5 histones. Two sets of antibodies were induced by murine H1(0). One set reacted with only the carboxyl-terminal domain of murine H1(0) and preferred the murine over the bovine and human proteins. The second set of antibodies reacted with the globular domain of murine H1(0) and did not distinguish among murine, bovine and human H1(0) species. There were five positions in the first 60 residues of the carboxyl-terminal domain in which the murine H1(0) differed from the human H1(0). In this region, the murine H1(0) had no more than 49% overall homology with other H1 and H5 histones; however, short sequences in the domain were very similar to short sequences that occur in rabbit H1.3, trout H1 and goose or chicken H5. In comparisons based on these and other published data, the carboxyl-terminal domain of H1(0) is found to be more variable among species than is the globular domain; the first two-thirds of the H1(0) carboxyl-terminal domain is largely unique and does not show great overall homology with H1 or H5, whereas the last third is again more conserved. As the first two-thirds of the domain is the only portion where the homology with H5 is less than 50%, it may be responsible for functional differences between H1(0) and H5.     

Mapping the interaction surface of linker histone H1(0) with the nucleosome of native chromatin in vivo

H1 linker histones stabilize the nucleosome, limit nucleosome mobility and facilitate the condensation of metazoan chromatin. Here, we have combined systematic mutagenesis, measurement of in vivo binding by photobleaching microscopy, and structural modeling to determine the binding geometry of the globular domain of the H1(0) linker histone variant within the nucleosome in unperturbed, native chromatin in vivo. We demonstrate the existence of two distinct DNA-binding sites within the globular domain that are formed by spatial clustering of multiple residues. The globular domain is positioned via interaction of one binding site with the major groove near the nucleosome dyad. The second site interacts with linker DNA adjacent to the nucleosome core. Multiple residues bind cooperatively to form a highly specific chromatosome structure that provides a mechanism by which individual domains of linker histones interact to facilitate chromatin condensation.     

Tudor domains of the PRC2 components PHF1 and PHF19 selectively bind to histone H3K36me3

PRC2 is the major H3K27 methyltransferase and is responsible for maintaining repressed gene expression patterns throughout development. It contains four core components: EZH2, EED, SUZ12 and RbAp46/48 and some cell-type specific components. In this study, we focused on characterizing the histone binding domains of PHF1 and PHF19, and found that the Tudor domains of PHF1 and PHF19 selectively bind to histone H3K36me3. Structural analysis of these Tudor domains also shed light on how these Tudor domains selectively bind to histone H3K36me3. The histone H3K36me3 binding by the Tudor domains of PHF1, PHF19 and likely MTF2 provide another recruitment and regulatory mechanism for the PRC2 complex. In addition, we found that the first PHD domains of PHF1 and PHF19 do not exhibit histone H3K4 binding ability, nor do they affect the Tudor domain binding to histones.     

Trithorax-group protein ASH1 methylates histone H3 lysine 36

Drosophila discs absent, small, or homeotic-1 (ASH1) is a member of trithorax-group proteins that play essential roles in epigenetic regulation of Hox genes. Drosophila ASH1 genetically interacts with trithorax and has been reported to methylate histone H3 lysine 4 (K4) as well as H3 K9 and H4 K20. The function of mammalian ASH1, by contrast, has remained largely unknown. Here we report a histone lysine scanning mutation assay using recombinant core histones and in vitro reconstituted nucleosomes to identify targets of mammalian methyltransferases by fluorographic, Western blot, and mass spectrometric analyses. The assay reproduced specificities of previously known histone methyltransferases and further revealed unexpectedly that mammalian ASH1 mono- or di-methylates histone H3 K36 but not any other lysine residues of recombinant unmodified mammalian histones. Under the same experimental condition, lysine to arginine substitution of histone H3 at position 36 abolished the methyltransferase activity of Drosophila ASH1, suggesting that K36 is their specific target. We also demonstrate that native ASH1 proteins, consisting of the carboxy-terminal domains including the catalytic site, retain the specificity for K36. Taken together, our data suggest that ASH1 subfamily of SET domain proteins have K36-specific methyltransferase activities evolutionarily conserved from flies to mammals.     

Roles of H1 domains in determining higher order chromatin structure and H1 location

Peptides derived from calf thymus H1 and rat liver H1, comprising only the globular and COOH-terminal domains of the intact molecule and therefore lacking NH2-terminal domains, have been shown by reconstitution to be as effective as the complete H1 molecule in inducing higher-order-chromatin structure. As the globular domain of H1 alone cannot induce chromatin folding, our results demonstrate that this function is primarily controlled by the COOH-terminal domain of the molecule. Surprisingly, these peptides do not locate correctly with respect to the nucleosome. This is demonstrated by their failure to confer upon reconstitutes the ability to protect DNA fragments of chromatosome length when digested with micrococcal nuclease. The precise placement of the H1 molecule (globular domain) with respect to the nucleosome is shown to be influenced by the "tail" domains of both H1 and the core histones.     

Distinct properties of the two putative "globular domains" of the yeast linker histone, Hho1p

The putative linker histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hho1p, has two regions of sequence (GI and GII) that are homologous to the single globular domains of linker histones H1 and H5 in higher eukaryotes. However, the two Hho1p "domains" differ with respect to the conservation of basic residues corresponding to the two putative DNA-binding sites (sites I and II) on opposite faces of the H5 globular domain. We find that GI can protect chromatosome-length DNA, like the globular domains of H1 and H5 (GH1 and GH5), but GII does not protect. However, GII, like GH1 and GH5, binds preferentially (and with higher affinity than GI) to four-way DNA junctions in the presence of excess linear DNA competitor, and binds more tightly than GI to linker-histone-depleted chromatin. Surprisingly, in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), GII is largely unfolded, whereas GI, like GH1 and GH5, is structured, with a high alpha-helical content. However, in the presence of high concentrations of large tetrahedral anions (phosphate, sulphate, perchlorate) GII is also folded; the anions presumably mimic DNA in screening the positive charge. This raises the possibility that chromatin-bound Hho1p may be bifunctional, with two folded nucleosome-binding domains.     

Cooperative binding of the globular domains of histones H1 and H5 to DNA.

In view of the likely role of H1-H1 interactions in the stabilization of chromatin higher order structure, we have asked whether interactions can occur between the globular domains of the histone molecules. We have studied the properties of the isolated globular domains of H1 and the variant H5 (GH1 and GH5) and we have shown (by sedimentation analysis, electron microscopy, chemical cross-linking and nucleoprotein gel electrophoresis) that although GH1 shows no, and GH5 little if any, tendency to self-associate in dilute solution, they bind highly cooperatively to DNA. The resulting complexes appear to contain essentially continuous arrays of globular domains bridging 'tramlines' of DNA, similar to those formed with intact H1, presumably reflecting the ability of the globular domain to bind more than one DNA segment, as it is likely to do in the nucleosome. Additional (thicker) complexes are also formed with GH5, probably resulting from association of the primary complexes, possibly with binding of additional GH5. The highly cooperative nature of the binding, in close apposition, of GH1 and GH5 to DNA is fully compatible with the involvement of interactions between the globular domains of H1 and its variants in chromatin folding.     

Accumulation of the isolated carboxy-terminal domain of histone H1 in the Xenopus oocyte nucleus

Histone H1 accumulates in the nucleus after injection into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes. A proteolytic fragment of 89 amino acids encompassing the carboxy-terminal domain also accumulates in the nucleus. Lysine, alanine and proline compose 84% of this domain. Accumulation is not due solely to the high lysine content since poly-L-lysine does not accumulate in the nucleus when injected into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes. Proteolytic fragments encompassing other domains of the molecule are degraded in the oocyte after injection. In these instances degradation is more rapid in the cytoplasm than in the nucleus giving the false impression of accumulation in the nucleus, an artefact which is likely to confuse other studies of protein migration. Susceptibility to rapid degradation is a dominant feature, thus the globular domain destabilises the contiguous carboxy-terminal domain. The properties of the carboxy-terminal domain of H1 and the possible involvement of the amino acids lysine, proline and alanine in migration are discussed and compared with those of a domain that specifies migration of nucleoplasmin into the oocyte nucleus.     

The BAH domain of Rsc2 is a histone H3 binding domain

Bromo-adjacent homology (BAH) domains are commonly found in chromatin-associated proteins and fall into two classes; Remodels the Structure of Chromatin (RSC)-like or Sir3-like. Although Sir3-like BAH domains bind nucleosomes, the binding partners of RSC-like BAH domains are currently unknown. The Rsc2 subunit of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex contains an RSC-like BAH domain and, like the Sir3-like BAH domains, we find Rsc2 BAH also interacts with nucleosomes. However, unlike Sir3-like BAH domains, we find that Rsc2 BAH can bind to recombinant purified H3 in vitro, suggesting that the mechanism of nucleosome binding is not conserved. To gain insight into the Rsc2 BAH domain, we determined its crystal structure at 2.4 Å resolution. We find that it differs substantially from Sir3-like BAH domains and lacks the motifs in these domains known to be critical for making contacts with histones. We then go on to identify a novel motif in Rsc2 BAH that is critical for efficient H3 binding in vitro and show that mutation of this motif results in defective Rsc2 function in vivo. Moreover, we find this interaction is conserved across Rsc2-related proteins. These data uncover a binding target of the Rsc2 family of BAH domains and identify a novel motif that mediates this interaction.     

Identification of two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5.

The nature of the complexes of histones H1 and H5 and their globular domains (GH1 and GH5) with DNA suggested two DNA-binding sites which are likely to be the basis of the preference of H1 and H5 for the nucleosome, compared with free DNA. More recently the X-ray and NMR structures of GH5 and GH1, respectively, have identified two basic clusters on opposite sides of the domains as candidates for these sites. Removal of the positive charge at either location by mutagenesis impairs or abolishes the ability of GH5 to assemble cooperatively in ''tramline'' complexes containing two DNA duplexes, suggesting impairment or loss of its ability to bind two DNA duplexes. The mutant forms of GH5 also fail to protect the additional 20 bp of nucleosomal DNA that are characteristically protected by H1, H5 and wild-type recombinant GH5. They still bind to H1/H5-depleted chromatin, but evidently inappropriately. These results confirm the existence of, and identify the major components of, two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5, and they strongly suggest that both binding sites are required to position the globular domain correctly on the nucleosome.     

Histones H1(0) and H5 share common epitopes with RNA polymerase II

We report here the cross-reaction of RNA polymerase II antiserum with histones H1(0) and H5 and the complementary cross-reactions of antisera to the globular domain of histone H1(0) (GH1(0)) and histone H5 (GH5) with RNA polymerase II. Immunoblotting of RNA polymerase II antiserum with fragments of histone H1(0) localized the cross-reaction at the junction of the globular and C-terminal domains of histone H1(0). The structural homology implied by these cross-reactions is interesting in light of reports that suggest H1(0) may play a role in differentiation and development.