Modulation of prolactin but not corticosterone responses to stress in relation to parental effort in a long-lived bird

We tested the hypothesis that parental effort modulates the magnitude of corticosterone and prolactin responses to stress in a long-lived bird, the Black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla). To do so, we compared corticosterone and prolactin responses to capture/restraint stress between chick-rearing birds and failed breeders (no parental effort). We predicted that (1) the increase in plasma corticosterone levels in response to stress should be lower in chick-rearing birds, (2) the decrease in plasma prolactin levels in response to stress should be lower in chick-rearing birds, and (3) as both sexes care for the chick, there should be no sex difference in the hormonal response to stress. Baseline plasma corticosterone and prolactin levels were higher in chick-rearing birds and were not influenced by body condition. Failed breeders were in better condition than chick-rearing individuals. Corticosterone response to stress was unaffected by parental effort as both chick-rearing and failed birds exhibited a robust corticosterone increase. Prolactin response to stress was however clearly influenced by parental effort: chick-rearing birds showed a modest 9% prolactin decrease whereas in failed birds prolactin concentrations fell by 41%. Body condition did not influence hormonal responses to stress. When facing stressful condition, breeding kittiwakes attenuate their prolactin response to stress while enhancing their secretion of corticosterone. Increasing corticosterone secretion triggers foraging efforts and diminishes nest attendance whereas an attenuation of prolactin response to stress maintains parental behavior. We suggest that this hormonal mechanism facilitates a flexible time-budget that has been interpreted as a buffer against environmental variability.     

Prey-induced changes to a predator's behaviour and morphology: Implications for shell-claw covariance in the northwest Atlantic

Whereas many plasticity studies demonstrate the importance of inducible defences among prey, far fewer investigate the potential role of inducible offences among predators. Here we ask if natural differences in a snail's shell hardness can induce developmental changes to a predatory crab's claw size. To do this, we fed Littorina obtusata snails from either thick- or thin-shelled populations to captive European green crabs Carcinus maenas. The crabs' shell-breaking behaviour dominated among those fed thin-shelled snails, whereas crabs fed thick-shelled snails mostly winkled flesh through the shell opening without damaging the shell itself (a.k.a. aperture-probing behaviour). Significantly, the size of crab crusher claws grew in proportion to the frequency of shell-crushing behaviour and, for a same shell-crushing frequency, crabs fed thick-shelled snails grew larger crusher claws than those fed thin-shelled snails after two experimental moults. Diet and behaviour had no effect on the growth of the smaller cutter claws of same individuals, providing good evidence that allometric changes to crusher claws were indeed a result of differential use while feeding. Findings indicate that both predation habits and claw sizes are affected by green crabs' diet, supporting the hypothesis that prey-induced phenotypic plasticity contributes to earlier accounts of shell-claw covariance between this predator and its Littorina prey in the wild.