Side-chain modified analogues of histaprodifen: asymmetric synthesis and histamine H1-receptor activity

New analogues of histaprodifen with polar side chains have been stereoselectively synthesized and evaluated as histamine H(1)-receptor agonists. As a key transformation the asymmetric aminohydroxylation has been used, which was successfully realized for the first time on an imidazolyl derivative. While all chiral analogues proved to be weak H(1)-receptor antagonists, an achiral keto derivative of histaprodifen turned out to be the first 2-acylated histamine congener displaying partial H(1)-receptor agonism (relative potency 12%).     

Benzimidazole-substituted (3-phenoxypropyl)amines as histamine H3 receptor ligands

A series of non-imidazole histamine H(3) receptor antagonists based on the (3-phenoxypropyl)amine motif, which is a common pharmacophore for H(3) antagonists, has been identified. A preliminary SAR study around the amine moiety has identified 8a as a potent H(3) antagonist possessing a good pharmacokinetic profile in the rat.     

Structure-activity relationships of non-imidazole H(3) receptor ligands. Part 1

SAR studies for novel non-imidazole containing H(3) receptor antagonists with high potency and selectivity for rat H(3) receptors are described. A high throughput screening lead, A-923, was further elaborated in a systematic manner to clarify a pharmacophore for this class of aryloxyalkyl piperazine based compounds.     

Synthesis and structure–activity relationships of 2-(1,4′-bipiperidin-1′-yl)thiazolopyridine as H3 receptor antagonists

A series of 2-(1,4′-bipiperidine-1′-yl)thiazolopyridines was synthesized and evaluated as a new lead of non-imidazole histamine H₃ receptor antagonists. Introduction of diversity at the 6-position of the pyridine ring was designed to enhance in vitro potency and decrease hERG activity. The structure–activity relationships for these new thiazolopyridine antagonists are discussed.     

Some chemical aspects of histamine H2-receptor antagonists.

Certain chemical properties, which may determine the biological actions of the recently discovered histamine H2-receptor antagonists burimamide and metiamide, are identified, partly by considering the derivation of these antagonists. Examples are given of attempts to design antagonists using histamine as starting point. A partial agonist was eventually obtained through modifying the side chain of histamine but retaining the imidazole ring. Further developments led to the synthesis of uncharged thioureido analogues and to the discovery of the antagonist, burimamide. Consideration of the relative concentration of imidazole tautomers led to the replacement of a methylene group (-CH2-) with an isosteric thioether (-S-) link in the side chain, and incorporation of a methyl group in the imidazole ring; these changes afforded metiamide, an orally active antagonist. These developments emphasize that the imidazole ring appears to have a special importance at H2 receptors. Burimamide and metiamide are hydrophilic molecules that resemble histamine in having an imidazole ring but differ in the side chain which, though polar, is uncharged. By contrast, the H1-receptor antihistaminic drugs are lipophilic molecules; their resemblance to histamine is in having a positively charged ammonium side chain. These substantial chemical differences between the respective antagonists probably determine their selectivity in distinguishing between the two types of histamine receptor. Furthermore, the very low lipophilicities of these H2-receptor antagonists probably account for the lack of central nervous system and local anesthetic effects normally associated with the use of antihistaminic drugs.     

Imidazole derivatives as a novel class of hybrid compounds with inhibitory histamine N-methyltransferase potencies and histamine hH3 receptor affinities

In this study, a novel series of imidazole-containing compounds with dual properties, that is, inhibitory potency at the enzyme histamine N(tau)-methyltransferase (HMT) and antagonist potency at histamine H(3) receptors was designed and synthesized. Pharmacologically, these new hybrid drugs were evaluated in functional assays for their inhibitory potencies at rat kidney HMT and for their antagonist activities on synaptosomes of rat cerebral cortex. For selected compounds, binding affinities at recombinant human histamine H(3) receptors were determined. The first compounds (1-10) of the series proved to be H(3) receptor ligands of high potency at rat synaptosomes or of high binding affinity at human H(3) receptors, respectively, but of only moderate activity as inhibitors of rat kidney HMT. In contrast, aminoquinoline- or tetrahydroacridine-containing derivatives 11-17 also displayed HMT inhibitory potency in the nanomolar concentration range. Preliminary data from molecular modeling investigations showed that the imidazole derivative 15 and the HMT inhibitor quinacrine possess identical binding areas. The most interesting compound (14) is simultaneously a highly potent H(3) receptor ligand (K(i)=4.1nM) and a highly potent HMT inhibitor (IC(50)=24nM), which makes this derivative a valuable pharmacological tool for further development.     

Antinociceptive activity of furan-containing congeners of improgan and ranitidine

Furan-containing congeners of the histamine H(2) receptor antagonist ranitidine were synthesized and tested for improgan-like antinociceptive activity. The most potent ligand of the series, VUF5498, is the most potent improgan-like agent described to date (ED(50)=25 nmol, icv). This compound is approximately equal in potency with morphine. These non-imidazole, improgan-like pain relievers further define the structural requirements for analgesics of this class and are important tools for ongoing mechanism-based studies.     

Synthesis and structure-activity relationships for biphenyl H3 receptor antagonists with moderate anti-cholinesterase activity

The combination of antagonism at histamine H(3) receptors and inhibition of acetylcholinesterase has been recently proposed as an approach to devise putative new therapeutic agents for cognitive diseases. The 4,4'-biphenyl fragment has been reported by us as a rigid scaffold leading to potent and selective non-imidazole H(3)-antagonists. Starting from these premises, the current work presents an expanded series of histamine H(3) receptor antagonists, characterized by a central 4,4'-biphenyl scaffold, where the structure-activity profile of both mono-basic and di-basic compounds is further explored and their ability to inhibit rat brain cholinesterase activity is determined. The steric properties and basicity of the terminal groups were modulated in symmetrical compounds, carrying identical substituents, and in asymmetrical compounds, having a piperidine ring at one end and different groups at the other. The length of the linker connecting the biphenyl scaffold to the terminal groups was also modulated. Binding studies at rat and human H(3) receptors evidenced the highest binding affinities for di-basic compounds, in the order of nM concentrations, and that the steric requirements for the two terminal groups are different. Many potent compounds showed good selectivity profiles over the other histamine receptors. Interestingly, some derivatives displayed a moderate ability to inhibit rat brain cholinesterase, for example compound 12 (1-[2-(4'-piperidinomethyl-biphenyl-4-yl)ethyl]piperidine) has a pIC(50)=5.96 for cholinesterase inhibition and high H(3) receptor binding affinity and antagonist potency (pK(i)=8.70; pK(B)=9.28). These compounds can be considered as rigid analogs of a recently reported class of dual-acting compounds and as a promising starting point for the design of new H(3)-antagonists with anti-cholinesterase activity.     

Analogues and derivatives of ciproxifan, a novel prototype for generating potent histamine H3-receptor antagonists

Novel derivatives of the highly potent and selective histamine H3-receptor antagonist ciproxifan (3) with different chain lengths as well as with structural variants of the cyclopropyl ketone moiety have been prepared and screened for their antagonist H3-receptor potencies in vitro and in vivo. Some derivatives (2, 6-8, 12) containing other functionalities were effective in vitro in the same (sub)nanomolar concentration range and in vivo in a remarkably low oral dose.     

Design, synthesis and pharmacological screening of a series of N1-(substituted) aryl-5,7-dimethyl-2-(substituted)pyrido(2,3-d)-pyrimidin-4(3H)-ones as potential histamine H1-receptor antagonists

A series of N1-(substituted)aryl-5,7-dimethyl-2-(substituted)pyrido(2,3-d)pyrimidin-4(3H)-one was designed on the basis of the triangular pharmacophoric requirement of histamine H1-receptor antagonists. The designed series was synthesized by cyclo-condensation of monoaryl thiourea with ethyl cyanoacetate in the presence of dry HCl gas to give N1-(substituted aryl)-2-mercaptopyrimidine-4(3H)-one, which on cyclo-condensation with acetylacetone gave the pyridopyrimidinone. Further methylation of the mercapto group at C-2 with methyl iodide followed by nucleophilic displacement of the methylmercapto group by various amines gave the targeted compounds. All the synthesized compounds were screened for histamine H1-receptor antagonistic activity by the in vitro method of inhibition of the isotonic contraction induced by histamine on isolated guinea pig ileum using cetirizine as a standard drug. All the compounds exhibited potent histamine H1-receptor antagonistic activity with pA2 values from 7.30- 9.75 (cetirizine, pA2 value 9.40). The potent compounds were screened for their in vivo antihistaminic activity by protection of animal from asphyxic shock. The sedative potential of potent compounds was checked on albino mice by photoactometer and they had comparative sedative potential to the standard drug cetirizine. None of the compound exhibited anticholinergic activity in the in vitro rat ileum model.     

Dibasic non-imidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists with a rigid biphenyl scaffold

A class of rigid, dibasic, non-imidazole H3 antagonists was developed, starting from a series of previously described flexible compounds. The original polymethylene chain between two tertiary amine groups was replaced by a rigid scaffold, composed by a phenyl ring or a biphenyl fragment. Modulation of the distance between the two amine groups, and of their alkyl substituents, was driven by superposition of molecular models and docking into a receptor model, resulting in the identification of 1,1'-[biphenyl-4,4'-diylbis(methylene)]bis-piperidine (5) as a subtype-selective H3 antagonist with high binding affinity (pKi=9.47) at human H3 histamine receptor.     

Search for multifunctional agents against Alzheimer’s disease among non-imidazole histamine H3 receptor ligands. In vitro and in vivo pharmacological evaluation and computational studies of piperazine derivatives

In the search for new treatments for complex disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease the Multi-Target-Directed Ligands represent a very promising approach. The aim of the present study was to identify multifunctional compounds among several series of non-imidazole histamine H3 receptor ligands, derivatives of 1-[2-thiazol-5-yl-(2-aminoethyl)]-4-n-propylpiperazine, 1-[2-thiazol-4-yl-(2-aminoethyl)]-4-n-propylpiperazine and 1-phenoxyalkyl-4-(amino)alkylopiperazine using in vitro and in vivo pharmacological evaluation and computational studies. Performed in vitro assays showed moderate potency of tested compounds against acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). Molecular modeling studies have revealed possible interactions between the active compounds and both AChE and BuChE as well as the human H3 histamine receptor. Computational studies showed the high drug-likeness of selected compounds with very good physicochemical profiles. The parallel artificial membrane permeation assay proved outstanding blood–brain barrier penetration in test conditions. The most promising compound, A12, chemically methyl(4-phenylbutyl){2-[2-(4-propylpiperazin-1-yl)-1,3-thiazol-5-yl]ethyl}amine, possesses good balanced multifunctional profile with potency toward studied targets - H3 antagonist activity (pA₂ = 8.27), inhibitory activity against both AChE (IC₅₀ = 13.96 μM), and BuChE (IC₅₀ = 14.62 μM). The in vivo pharmacological studies revealed the anti-amnestic properties of compound A12 in the passive avoidance test on mice.     

Histamine modulation of eosinophil migration.

Preincubation of eosinophils with 10(-5) M or higher concentrations of histamine inhibited the eosinophil chemotactic response to endotoxin-activated serum whether by using the nucleopore filter assay and counting the cells migrating through the filter, or by using the Zigmond-Hirsch assay and counting the cells at each 10-mum interval. When the H2-receptor sites on the eosinophils were blocked by metiamide, the inhibitory capacity of histamine was prevented. Preincubation of eosinophils with 10(-6) M histamine increased the number of responding eosinophils to endotoxin-activated serum and this enhancement was blocked by an H1-receptor antagonist. Isoproteronol and aminophylline inhibited eosinophil movement and increasing concentrations of dibutryl cyclic AMP inhibited eosinophil migration. Concentrations of histamine that consistently resulted in inhibition of eosinophil movement stimulated an increase in cyclic AMP that was prevented by blocking the H2-receptor but not the H1-receptor. Thus, histamine-dependent inhibition of the eosinophil chemotactic response to other agents is mediated through the H2-receptor and is associated with an increase in the intracellular level of cyclic AMP whereas histamine dependent enhancement of eosinophil migration to other agents appears to be mediated through the H1-receptor. Eosinophils behave as a heterogeneous population as assessed by the ability of histamine to augment or inhibit cell migration. This may reflect differences in H1 to H2 receptor density or cell responsiveness to receptor stimulation. The chemoattractant activity of histamine itself is not influenced by H1 or H2 receptor antagonists, thus it is possible that an eosinophil has a third type of histamine receptor.     

Structural variations of 1-(4-(phenoxymethyl)benzyl)piperidines as nonimidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists

Recent bioisoteric replacements in histamine H3 receptor ligands with an exchange of the imidazole moiety by a piperidino group as well as of the trimethylene chain in 4-((3-phenoxy)propyl)-lH-imidazole derivatives (proxifan class) by an alpha,alpha'-xylendiyl linker represents the starting point in the development of 1-(4-(phenoxymethyl)benzyl)piperidines as a new class of nonimidazole histamine H3 receptor antagonists. According to different strategies in optimization of imidazole-containing antagonists the central benzyl phenyl ether moiety was replaced by numerous other polar functionalities. Additionally, the ortho- and meta-analogues of the lead were synthesized to determine the influence of the position of the piperidinomethyl substituent. The new compounds were tested in an in vitro binding assay for their affinities for cloned human H3 receptors stably expressed in CHO-K1 cells and for their oral in vivo potencies brain in a functional screening assay in the brain of mice. Additionally, activities of selected compounds were determined in the guinea-pig ileum functional test model. In contrast to the analogues ortho-substituted compounds all other compounds maintained respectable affinities for the human H3 receptor (-log Ki values 6.3-7.5). Despite the results from other classes of compounds the 4-methyl substituted derivatives generally displayed higher affinities than the corresponding 4-chloro substituted compounds. In vivo only the inverse phenyl benzyl ether (3) showed worthwhile antagonist potencies.     

H3-Receptors Control Histamine Release in Human Brain

The regulation of histamine release was studied on slices prepared from pieces of human cerebral cortex removed during neurosurgery and labeled with L-[3H]histidine. Depolarization by increased extracellular K+ concentration induced [3H]histamine release, although to a lesser extent than from rat brain slices. Exogenous histamine reduced by up to 60% the K+-evoked release, with an EC50 of 3.5 +/- 0.5 X 10(-8) M. The H3-receptor antagonists impromidine and thioperamide reversed the histamine effect in an apparently competitive manner and enhanced the K+-evoked release, indicating a participation of endogenous histamine in the release control process. The potencies of histamine and the H3-receptor antagonists were similar to those of these agents at presynaptic H3-autoreceptors controlling [3H]histamine release from rat brain slices. It is concluded that H3-receptors control histamine release in the human brain.     

In vitro and in vivo comparisons of antiandrogenic potencies of two histamine H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and etintidine--HCl

The antiandrogenic potency of cimetidine was compared to that of a new histamine H2-receptor antagonist, etintidine-HCl (ORF 16753-02). Although both compounds displaced [3H]dihydrotestosterone from androgen receptors in vitro and inhibited androgen-stimulated growth of the accessory sex organs of male rats in vivo, etintidine-HCl was significantly less antiandrogenic than cimetidine in the analysis of androgen receptor binding and in the inhibition of seminal vesicle weights. Because etintidine-HCl has been shown previously to have more potent gastric antisecretory activity than cimetidine, its lower antiandrogenic activity suggests that etintidine-HCl has a much wider therapeutic ratio and that its use clinically will result in fewer antiandrogenic side effects.     

Structure activity relationships for bradykinin antagonists on the inhibition of cytokine release and the release of histamine

Highly potent bradykinin antagonists were found to inhibit bradykinin-induced release of cytokines but to stimulate histamine release. Both actions show structural requirements completely different from those for bradykinin B1 and B2 receptors, indicating that the release of some cytokines from spleen mononuclear cells and of histamine from rat mast cells is not mediated by these receptors. Most potent bradykinin antagonists release histamine at lower concentrations than does bradykinin itself. Dimers of bradykinin antagonists are the most potent compounds for histamine release. In contrast to enhanced histamine release, potent inhibition of cytokine release enhances the applicability of these compounds as anti-inflammatory drugs. Many of the peptides designed for high B2-receptor antagonism were found to be compared by their concentrations far more potent for inhibition of cytokine release than for smooth muscle contraction. Thus, for some antagonists inhibition of cytokine release was detected at concentrations as low as 10(-15) M. The rational design of peptide and nonpeptide bradykinin antagonists for therapeutic use requires not only knowledge about the potency but also knowledge about the structure-activity relationships of such important side effects as cytokine and histamine release.     

Selective stimulation of histamine H3 autoreceptors

A simple derivative of histamine, alpha-methylhistamine i.e. 4-(2-aminopropyl)-imidazole, was shown to potently inhibit the K+-induced release of [3H] histamine from slices of rat cerebral cortex previously incubated in the presence of [3H] histidine. The maximal inhibition elicited by alpha-methylhistamine was of about 60% i.e. similar to that elicited by exogenous histamine. The effect occurred with an EC50 value of 4.3 +/- 1.1 X 10(-9) M about 10 times lower than that of histamine and was reversed by a H3-receptor antagonist. Since alpha-methylhistamine is known to display negligible potency at H1- and H2-receptors, this compound appears to be the first highly potent and selective H3-receptor agonist to be identified.     

Identification and Characterization of ZEL-H16 as a Novel Agonist of the Histamine H(3) Receptor

The histamine H3 receptor (H3R) has been recognized as a promising target for the treatment of various central and peripheral nervous system diseases. In this study, a non-imidazole compound, ZEL-H16, was identified as a novel histamine H3 receptor agonist. ZEL-H16 was found to bind to human H3R with a Ki value of approximately 2.07 nM and 4.36 nM to rat H3R. Further characterization indicated that ZEL-H16 behaved as a partial agonist on the inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (the efficacy was 60% of that of histamine) and activation of ERK1/2 signaling (the efficacy was 50% of that of histamine) at H3 receptors, but acted as a full agonist just like histamin in the guinea-pig ileum contraction assay. These effects were blocked by pertussis toxin and H3 receptor specific antagonist thioperamide. ZEL-H16 showed no agonist or antagonist activities at the cloned human histamine H1, H2, and H4 receptors and other biogenic amine GPCRs in the CRE-driven reporter assay. Furthermore, our present data demonstrated that treatment of ZEL-H16 resulted in intensive H3 receptor internalization and delayed recycling to the cell surface as compared to that of control with treatment of histamine. Thus, ZEL-H16 is a novel and potent nonimidazole agonist of H3R, which might serve as a pharmacological tool for future investigations or as possible therapeutic agent of H3R.     

Bronchial vasodilation by histamine in sheep: characterization of receptor subtype.

Histamine has been shown to mediate features of pulmonary allergic reactions including increased tracheobronchial blood flow. To determine whether the increase in blood flow was due to stimulation of H1- or H2-histamine receptors, we gave histamine base (0.1 micrograms/kg iv) or histamine dihydrochloride as an aerosol (10 breaths of 0.5% "low dose" or 5% "high dose") before and after H1- or H2-receptor antagonists. Blood velocity in the common bronchial branch of the bronchoesophageal artery (Vbr) was continuously measured using a chronically implanted Doppler flow probe. Pretreatment with H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine, ranitidine, or metiamide did not affect the increase in Vbr induced by intravenous histamine [106 +/- 45% (SD)]. Addition of the H1-receptor antagonists diphenhydramine or chlorpheniramine, however, reduced the Vbr response to 16 +/- 22, 21 +/- 28, 23 +/- 23, and 37 +/- 32% of the unblocked responses (P less than 0.05) when intravenous histamine was given at 3, 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively, after the H1 antagonist. At 40, 50, and 60 min the H1-receptor blockade appeared to attenuate, but subsequent continuous infusion of chlorpheniramine (2 mg.kg-1.min-1) then blocked the histamine response for 60 min. Low-dose histamine aerosol did not change mean arterial or pulmonary arterial pressures, cardiac output, or arterial blood gases but increased Vbr transiently from 15.2 +/- 3.4 to 37.6 +/- 8.4 (SE) cm/s. After chlorpheniramine, the Vbr response to histamine, 16.3 +/- 2.2 to 22.6 +/- 3.6 cm/s, was significantly reduced (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)