Investigation of Clade B New World Arenavirus Tropism by Using Chimeric GP1 Proteins

Clade B of the New World arenaviruses contains both pathogenic and nonpathogenic members, whose surface glycoproteins (GPs) are characterized by different abilities to use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) protein as a receptor. Using closely related pairs of pathogenic and nonpathogenic viruses, we investigated the determinants of the GP1 subunit that confer these different characteristics. We identified a central region (residues 85 to 221) in the Guanarito virus GP1 that was sufficient to interact with hTfR1, with residues 159 to 221 being essential. The recently solved structure of part of the Machupo virus GP1 suggests an explanation for these requirements.Arenaviruses are bisegmented, single-stranded RNA viruses that use an ambisense coding strategy to express four proteins: NP (nucleoprotein), Z (matrix protein), L (polymerase), and GP (glycoprotein). The viral GP is sufficient to direct entry into host cells, and retroviral vectors pseudotyped with GP recapitulate the entry pathway of these viruses (5, 13, 24, 31). GP is a class I fusion protein comprising two subunits, GP1 and GP2, cleaved from the precursor protein GPC (4, 14, 16, 18, 21). GP1 contains the receptor binding domain (19, 28), while GP2 contains structural elements characteristic of viral membrane fusion proteins (8, 18, 20, 38). The N-terminal stable signal peptide (SSP) remains associated with the mature glycoprotein after cleavage (2, 39) and plays a role in transport, maturation, and pH-dependent fusion (17, 35, 36, 37).The New World arenaviruses are divided into clades A, B, and C based on phylogenetic relatedness (7, 9, 11). Clade B contains the human pathogenic viruses Junin (JUNV), Machupo (MACV), Guanarito (GTOV), Sabia, and Chapare, which cause severe hemorrhagic fevers in South America (1, 10, 15, 26, 34). Clade B also contains the nonpathogenic viruses Amapari (AMAV), Cupixi, and Tacaribe (TCRV), although mild disease has been reported for a laboratory worker infected with TCRV (29).Studies with both viruses and GP-pseudotyped retroviral vectors have shown that the pathogenic clade B arenaviruses use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) to gain entry into human cells (19, 30). In contrast, GPs from nonpathogenic viruses, although capable of using TfR1 orthologs from other species (1), cannot use hTfR1 (1, 19) and instead enter human cells through as-yet-uncharacterized hTfR1-independent pathways (19). In addition, human T-cell lines serve as useful tools to distinguish these GPs, since JUNV, GTOV, and MACV pseudotyped vectors readily transduce CEM cells, while TCRV and AMAV GP vectors do not (27; also unpublished data). These properties of the GPs do not necessarily reflect a tropism of the pathogenic viruses for human T cells, since viral tropism is influenced by many factors and T cells are not a target for JUNV replication in vivo (3, 22, 25).     

Critical Role of Cyclophilin A and Its Prolyl-Peptidyl Isomerase Activity in the Structure and Function of the Hepatitis C Virus Replication Complex

Replication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA occurs on intracellular membranes, and the replication complex (RC) contains viral RNA, nonstructural proteins, and cellular cofactors. We previously demonstrated that cyclophilin A (CyPA) is an essential cofactor for HCV infection and the intracellular target of cyclosporine''s anti-HCV effect. Here we investigate the mechanism by which CyPA facilitates HCV replication. Cyclosporine treatment specifically blocked the incorporation of NS5B into the RC without affecting either the total protein level or the membrane association of the protein. Other nonstructural proteins or viral RNAs in the RC were not affected. NS5B from the cyclosporine-resistant replicon was resistant to this disruption of RC incorporation. We also isolated membrane fractions from both naïve and HCV-positive cells and found that CyPA is recruited into membrane fractions in HCV-replicating cells via an interaction with RC-associated NS5B, which is sensitive to cyclosporine treatment. Finally, we introduced point mutations in the prolyl-peptidyl isomerase (PPIase) motif of CyPA and demonstrated a critical role of this motif in HCV replication in cDNA rescue experiments. We propose a model in which the incorporation of the HCV polymerase into the RC depends on its interaction with a cellular chaperone protein and in which cyclosporine inhibits HCV replication by blocking this critical interaction and the PPIase activity of CyPA. Our results provide a mechanism of action for the cyclosporine-mediated inhibition of HCV and identify a critical role of CyPA''s PPIase activity in the proper assembly and function of the HCV RC.Hepatitis C virus (HCV), of the family Flaviviridae, is an enveloped, positive-stranded RNA virus. Spread mostly by blood-borne transmission, HCV infects more than 170 million people worldwide. The viral genome is composed of a single open reading frame (ORF) plus 5′- and 3′-nontranslated regions. The ORF encodes a large polyprotein that is cleaved by cellular and viral proteases into 10 viral proteins. The structural proteins, including the capsid protein (core), two glycoproteins (E1 and E2), and a small ion channel protein (p7), reside in the N-terminal half of the polyprotein. The rest of the ORF encodes six nonstructural (NS) proteins: NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B. NS3 through NS5B assemble into a replication complex (RC) and are necessary and sufficient for HCV RNA replication in cell culture (8, 42). NS3 is a multifunctional protein with both a serine protease and an RNA helicase activity. The protease activity is responsible for cleavage at the NS3-NS4A, NS4A-NS4B, NS4B-NS5A, and NS5A-NS5B junctions (5), and the helicase activity is probably required to unwind the double-stranded RNA intermediates formed during replication (38). NS4A serves as an essential cofactor for the NS3 protease and anchors the NS3 protein to intracellular membranes (25, 36, 39). NS4B induces the formation of a “membranous web” that is probably the site of HCV replication (16). It also contains a GTP-binding motif that is required for replication (17). The web is derived from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartment, although proteins of early-endosome origin have also been found to locate to the web (62). NS5A is a phosphoprotein and an integral component of the viral RC. The precise function of NS5A in replication is still unknown but appears to be regulated by phosphorylation and its interaction with several cellular proteins (19, 22, 24, 51, 52, 59, 63, 67). In addition, it may be involved in the transition from replication and particle formation (4, 45, 64). NS5B is the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that is responsible for copying the RNA genome of the virus during replication. Several cellular cofactors interact with NS5B and modulate its activity in the context of the viral RC (22, 24, 35, 69, 71).Positive-stranded RNA viruses alter the intracellular membranes of host cells to form an RC in which RNA replication occurs. Modifications include the proliferation and reorganization of certain cellular membranes (1). HCV forms an RC associated with altered cellular membranes (16, 23), and crude RCs (CRCs) that maintain the replicase activity in vitro can be isolated by membrane sedimentation or flotation techniques (2, 3, 18, 27, 37).Cyclosporine is a widely used immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory drug for organ transplant patients. It functions by forming an inhibitory complex with cyclophilins (CyPs) that inhibits the phosphatase activity of calcineurin, which is important for T-cell activation. In recent years, cyclosporine and its derivatives have been shown to be highly effective in suppressing HCV replication in vitro (44, 49, 53, 68) and in vivo (30). The mechanism of this inhibition is independent of its immunosuppressive function and distinct from that of interferon (IFN) (44, 53, 56, 68).We recently showed that HCV infection in vitro is inhibited when CyPA, a major intracellular target of cyclosporine, is downregulated by RNA interference, and mutations in NS5B that confer cyclosporine-resistant binding to CyPA contribute to the cyclosporine resistance of the replicons harboring these mutations (56, 71). Here we report that CyPA is recruited into the HCV RC together with NS5B in HCV replicon or in HCV-infected cells. Cyclosporine disrupts the association between RC-incorporated NS5B and CyPA and results in an exclusion of the polymerase from the viral RC. We also show that the prolyl-peptidyl isomerase (PPIase) motif of CyPA is essential for HCV replication.     

The Hepatitis C Virus NS4B Protein Can trans-Complement Viral RNA Replication and Modulates Production of Infectious Virus

Studies of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) life cycle have been aided by development of in vitro systems that enable replication of viral RNA and production of infectious virus. However, the functions of the individual proteins, especially those engaged in RNA replication, remain poorly understood. It is considered that NS4B, one of the replicase components, creates sites for genome synthesis, which appear as punctate foci at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. In this study, a panel of mutations in NS4B was generated to gain deeper insight into its functions. Our analysis identified five mutants that were incapable of supporting RNA replication, three of which had defects in production of foci at the ER membrane. These mutants also influenced posttranslational modification and intracellular mobility of another replicase protein, NS5A, suggesting that such characteristics are linked to focus formation by NS4B. From previous studies, NS4B could not be trans-complemented in replication assays. Using the mutants that blocked RNA synthesis, defective NS4B expressed from two mutants could be rescued in trans-complementation replication assays by wild-type protein produced by a functional HCV replicon. Moreover, active replication could be reconstituted by combining replicons that were defective in NS4B and NS5A. The ability to restore replication from inactive replicons has implications for our understanding of the mechanisms that direct viral RNA synthesis. Finally, one of the NS4B mutations increased the yield of infectious virus by five- to sixfold. Hence, NS4B not only functions in RNA replication but also contributes to the processes engaged in virus assembly and release.Recent estimates predict that the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is approximately 2.2% worldwide, equivalent to about 130 million persons (22). The virus typically establishes a chronic infection that frequently leads to serious liver disease (1), and current models indicate that both morbidity and mortality as a consequence of HCV infection will continue to rise for about the next 20 years (10, 11, 29).HCV is the only assigned species of the Hepacivirus genus within the family Flaviviridae. The virus can be classified into six genetic groups or clades (numbered 1 to 6) and then further separated into subtypes (e.g., 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, etc.) (53, 55). HCV has a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome that is approximately 9.6 kb in length (reviewed in reference 46). Genomic RNA carries a single open reading frame flanked by 5′ and 3′ nontranslated regions, which are important for both replication and translation (19, 20, 34, 47, 56). Viral RNA is translated by the host ribosomal machinery, and the resultant polyprotein is co- and posttranslationally cleaved to generate the mature viral proteins. The structural proteins (core, E1, and E2) and a small hydrophobic polypeptide called p7 are produced by the cellular proteases signal peptidase and signal peptide peptidase (28, 45, 54). Two virus-encoded proteases, the NS2-3 autoprotease and the NS3 serine protease (5, 13, 26), are responsible for maturation of the nonstructural (NS) proteins (NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B). With the exception of NS2, the NS proteins are necessary for genome replication (8, 40) and form replication complexes (RCs), which are located at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane (14, 24, 52, 57, 59). The functions of all viral constituents of RCs have not been characterized in detail. It is known that NS5B is the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (6), while NS3 possesses helicase and nucleoside triphosphatase activities in addition to acting as a protease (32, 58). However, the precise roles of the other proteins remain to be firmly established.Expression of NS4B, one of the replicase proteins, generates rearrangements at the ER membrane that have been termed the “membranous web” (14, 24) and “membrane-associated foci” (MAFs) (25). Detection of viral RNA at such foci suggests that NS4B is involved in creating the sites where genome synthesis occurs (18, 24, 59). It is predicted that NS4B has an amphipathic α-helix within its N-terminal region, which is followed by four transmembrane domains (TMDs) in the central portion of the protein (17, 42). As a result, the majority of NS4B is likely to be tightly anchored to membranes, and experimental evidence indicates that it has characteristics consistent with an integral membrane protein (27). It is thought that after membrane association, NS4B rearranges membranes into a network, thereby generating foci which act as a “scaffold” to facilitate RNA replication. The mechanisms engaged in formation of foci are not known but include the notion that the NS4B N terminus can translocate into the ER lumen, resulting in rearrangement of cellular membranes (41, 42). Alternatively, palmitoylation, a lipid modification, might facilitate polymerization of NS4B, in turn promoting formation of RCs on the ER membrane (68).Apart from inducing membranous changes required for replication, NS4B may perform other tasks in HCV RNA synthesis. For example, studies of cell culture adaptive mutations in subgenomic replicons (SGRs) have identified amino acid changes that can stimulate RNA production (39), suggesting that NS4B may exert a regulatory role in determining replication efficiency. In support of a regulatory function, replacement of NS4B sequences in an SGR from strain H77 (a genotype 1a strain) with those from strain Con-1 (a genotype 1b strain) gave higher levels of replication than for a wild-type (wt) strain H77 SGR (7). The corresponding replacement of strain Con-1 NS4B sequences with those from strain H77 reduced the replication efficiency of a Con-1 SGR (7). Moreover, interactions of NS4B with the RC can affect the behavior of other replicase proteins. For example, NS4B is needed for hyperphosphorylation of NS5A (35, 48) and restricts its intracellular movement (30).To try to gain greater insight into the functional organization of the components that constitute RCs, trans-complementation assays using defective and helper SGRs have been established (2, 64). Such studies reveal that the only protein capable of trans-complementation is NS5A, while active replication cannot be restored for replicons harboring deleterious mutations in NS3, NS4B, and NS5B. These data led to the conclusion that functional NS5A may be able to exchange between RCs (2), whereas, by inference, such exchange would not be possible for other HCV replicase proteins. In transient-replication assays, complementation by NS5A also relied on its expression as part of a polyprotein (minimally NS3-NS5A), and production of the protein alone failed to restore replication for an inactive SGR (2). However, in a separate study, stable expression of wt NS5A was capable of complementing a defective replicon (64). Thus, different assay systems can give dissimilar results for complementation by NS5A.In this study, we have created a series of mutations in the NS4B gene of HCV strain JFH1 (31) to explore the function of the protein in the HCV life cycle. We focused our attention on the C-terminal portion of NS4B, downstream from the predicted TMD regions, since it is relatively well conserved and is predicted to lie on the cytosolic side of the ER membrane (15, 42). Our analysis examines the impact of mutations on replication efficiency and the intracellular characteristics of the mutants compared to the behavior of the wt protein. In addition, we have utilized this series of mutants to reassess trans-complementation of NS4B in replication assays. Finally, we also analyze the impact of mutations which do not affect replication on the production of infectious virus to determine whether NS4B plays a role in virus assembly and release.     

The Direct Binding of Mrc1, a Checkpoint Mediator,to Mcm6, a Replication Helicase,Is Essential for the Replication Checkpoint against Methyl Methanesulfonate-Induced Stress

Mrc1 plays a role in mediating the DNA replication checkpoint. We surveyed replication elongation proteins that interact directly with Mrc1 and identified a replicative helicase, Mcm6, as a specific Mrc1-binding protein. The central portion of Mrc1, containing a conserved coiled-coil region, was found to be essential for interaction with the 168-amino-acid C-terminal region of Mcm6, and introduction of two amino acid substitutions in this C-terminal region abolished the interaction with Mrc1 in vivo. An mcm6 mutant bearing these substitutions showed a severe defect in DNA replication checkpoint activation in response to stress caused by methyl methanesulfonate. Interestingly, the mutant did not show any defect in DNA replication checkpoint activation in response to hydroxyurea treatment. The phenotype of the mcm6 mutant was suppressed when the mutant protein was physically fused with Mrc1. These results strongly suggest for the first time that an Mcm helicase acts as a checkpoint sensor for methyl methanesulfonate-induced DNA damage through direct binding to the replication checkpoint mediator Mrc1.Progression of the DNA replication machinery along chromosomes is a complex process. Replication forks pause occasionally when they encounter genomic regions that are difficult to replicate, such as highly transcribed regions, tRNA genes, and regions with specialized chromatin structure, like centromeric and heterochromatic regions (17). Replication forks also stall when treated with chemicals like methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), which causes DNA damage, or hydroxyurea (HU), which limits the cellular concentration of the deoxynucleoside triphosphate pool (17). Because de novo assembly and programming of the replisome do not occur after the onset of S phase (18), DNA replication forks must be protected from replicative stresses. The DNA replication checkpoint constitutes a surveillance mechanism for S-phase progression that safeguards replication forks from various replicative stresses (22, 38, 40), and malfunction of this checkpoint leads to chromosome instability and cancer development in higher organisms (4, 9).The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA replication checkpoint mediator Mrc1 is functionally conserved and is involved directly in DNA replication as a component of the replisome (1, 8, 16, 19, 29, 30). Mrc1, together with Tof1 and Csm3, is required for forming a replication pausing complex when the fork is exposed to replicative stress by HU (16). The pausing complex subsequently triggers events leading to DNA replication checkpoint activation and hence stable replicative arrest. A sensor kinase complex, Mec1-Ddc2 (ATR-ATRIP homolog of higher eukaryotes), is then recruited to the complex (14, 16). Mec1-Ddc2-mediated phosphorylation of Mrc1 activates the pausing complex, and phosphorylated Mrc1 likely recruits Rad53 (a putative homolog of CHK2 of higher eukaryotes), which is then activated via phosphorylation by Mec1-Ddc2 (1, 16, 20, 30). Activated Rad53 subsequently elicits a stress responses, i.e., stabilization of replication forks, induction of repair genes, and suppression of late-firing origins (24). It remains unclear, however, whether DNA replication checkpoint activation is induced in response to DNA damage by MMS, a reagent commonly used to study the DNA replication stress response. Several lines of evidence have suggested that MMS-induced damage is also sensed directly by the replication machinery (38, 40).Although biochemical and genetic interaction data have placed Mrc1 at the center of the replication checkpoint signal transduction cascade, its molecular function remains largely unknown. The proteins Mrc1, Tof1, and Csm3 associate with the Mcm complex (8, 27), a heterohexameric DNA helicase consisting of Mcm2 to Mcm7 proteins which unwinds the parental DNA duplex to allow replisome progression (3, 12, 18, 31, 32, 35). The Mcm complex associates with a specific set of regulatory proteins at forks to form replisome progression complexes (8). In addition to Mcm, Tof1, Csm3, and Mrc1, replisome progression complexes include factors such as Cdc45 and the GINS complex that are also required for fork progression (13, 26, 31, 32, 39). Claspin, a putative Xenopus laevis homolog of Mrc1, is also reported to associate with Cdc45, DNA polymerase ɛ (Polɛ), replication protein A, and two of the replication factor C complexes in aphidicolin-treated Xenopus egg extracts (19). Recently, Mrc1 was reported to interact directly with Polɛ (23).The aim of this study was to provide mechanistic insight into Mrc1 function in the DNA replication checkpoint. For this purpose, it was essential to identify, among all the essential proteins in the replication machinery, a specific protein that interacts with Mrc1 and to examine the role of this interaction in the DNA replication checkpoint. We found that Mrc1 interacts with Mcm6 directly and specifically. When the interaction between Mrc1 and Mcm6 was impaired, cells no longer activated the DNA replication checkpoint in response to MMS-induced replicative stress. Interestingly and unexpectedly, this interaction was not required for DNA replication checkpoint activation in response to HU-induced replicative stress. Our results provide the first mechanistic evidence that cells use separate mechanisms to transmit replicative stresses caused by MMS and HU for DNA replication checkpoint activation.     

Distinct Molecular Pathways to X4 Tropism for a V3-Truncated Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Lead to Differential Coreceptor Interactions and Sensitivity to a CXCR4 Antagonist

During the course of infection, transmitted HIV-1 isolates that initially use CCR5 can acquire the ability to use CXCR4, which is associated with an accelerated progression to AIDS. Although this coreceptor switch is often associated with mutations in the stem of the viral envelope (Env) V3 loop, domains outside V3 can also play a role, and the underlying mechanisms and structural basis for how X4 tropism is acquired remain unknown. In this study we used a V3 truncated R5-tropic Env as a starting point to derive two X4-tropic Envs, termed ΔV3-X4A.c5 and ΔV3-X4B.c7, which took distinct molecular pathways for this change. The ΔV3-X4A.c5 Env clone acquired a 7-amino-acid insertion in V3 that included three positively charged residues, reestablishing an interaction with the CXCR4 extracellular loops (ECLs) and rendering it highly susceptible to the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. In contrast, the ΔV3-X4B.c7 Env maintained the V3 truncation but acquired mutations outside V3 that were critical for X4 tropism. In contrast to ΔV3-X4A.c5, ΔV3-X4B.c7 showed increased dependence on the CXCR4 N terminus (NT) and was completely resistant to AMD3100. These results indicate that HIV-1 X4 coreceptor switching can involve (i) V3 loop mutations that establish interactions with the CXCR4 ECLs, and/or (ii) mutations outside V3 that enhance interactions with the CXCR4 NT. The cooperative contributions of CXCR4 NT and ECL interactions with gp120 in acquiring X4 tropism likely impart flexibility on pathways for viral evolution and suggest novel approaches to isolate these interactions for drug discovery.For human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) to enter a target cell, the gp120 subunit of the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) must engage CD4 and a coreceptor on the cell surface. Although numerous coreceptors have been identified in vitro, the two most important coreceptors in vivo are the CCR5 (3, 11, 19, 22, 24) and CXCR4 (27) chemokine receptors. HIV-1 variants that can use only CCR5 (R5 viruses) are critical for HIV-1 transmission and predominate during the early stages of infection (86, 90). The importance of CCR5 for HIV-1 transmission is underscored by the fact that individuals bearing a homozygous 32-bp deletion in the CCR5 gene (ccr5-Δ32) are largely resistant to HIV-1 infection (15, 49, 84). Although R5 viruses typically persist into late disease stages, viruses that can use CXCR4, either alone (X4 viruses) or in addition to CCR5 (R5X4 viruses), emerge in approximately 50% of individuals infected with subtype B or D viruses (12, 39, 44). Although not required for disease progression, the appearance of X4 and/or R5X4 viruses is associated with a more rapid depletion of CD4⁺ cells in peripheral blood and faster progression to AIDS (12, 44, 77, 86). However, it remains unclear whether these viruses are a cause or a consequence of accelerated CD4⁺ T cell decline (57). The emergence of CXCR4-using viruses has also complicated the use of small-molecule CCR5 antagonists as anti-HIV-therapeutics as these compounds can select for the outgrowth of X4 or R5X4 escape variants (93).Following triggering by CD4, gp120 binds to a coreceptor via two principal interactions: (i) the bridging sheet, a four-stranded antiparallel beta sheet that connects the inner and outer domains of gp120, together with the base of the V3 loop, engages the coreceptor N terminus (NT); and (ii) more distal regions of V3 interact with the coreceptor extracellular loops (ECLs) (13, 14, 36-38, 43, 59, 60, 78, 79, 88). Although both the NT and ECL interactions are important for coreceptor binding and entry, their relative contributions vary among different HIV-1 strains (23). For example, V3 interactions with the ECLs, particularly ECL2, serve a dominant role in CXCR4 utilization (7, 21, 50, 63, 72), while R5 viruses exhibit a more variable use of CCR5 domains, with the NT interaction being particularly important (4, 6, 20, 67, 83). Although V3 is the primary determinant of coreceptor preference (34), it is unclear how specificity for CCR5 and/or CXCR4 is determined, and, in particular, it is unknown how X4 tropism is acquired. Several reports have shown that the emergence of X4 tropism correlates with the acquisition of positively charged residues in the V3 stem (17, 29, 87), particularly at positions 11, 24, and 25 (8, 17, 28, 29, 42, 75), raising the possibility that these mutations directly or indirectly mediate interactions with negatively charged residues in the CXCR4 ECLs. However, Env domains outside V3, including V1/V2 (9, 32, 45, 46, 61, 64, 65, 80, 95) and even gp41 (40), can also contribute to coreceptor switching, and it is unclear mechanistically or structurally how X4 tropism is determined.We previously derived a replication-competent variant of the R5X4 HIV-1 clone R3A that contained a markedly truncated V3 loop (47). This Env was generated by introducing a mutation termed ΔV3(9,9), which deleted the distal 15 amino acids of V3. The ΔV3(9,9) mutation selectively ablated X4 tropism but left R5 tropism intact, consistent with the view that an interaction between the distal half of V3 and the ECLs is critical for CXCR4 usage (7, 21, 43, 50, 59, 60, 63, 72). This V3-truncated virus provided a unique opportunity to address whether CXCR4 utilization could be regained on a background in which this critical V3-ECL interaction had been ablated and, if so, by what mechanism. Here, we characterize two novel X4 variants of R3A ΔV3(9,9) derived by adapting this virus to replicate in CXCR4⁺ CCR5⁻ SupT1 cells. We show that R3A ΔV3(9,9) could indeed reacquire X4 tropism but through two markedly different mechanisms. One X4 variant, designated ΔV3-X4A, acquired changes in the V3 remnant that reestablished an interaction with the CXCR4 ECLs; the other, ΔV3-X4B, acquired changes outside V3 that engendered interactions with the CXCR4 NT. These divergent evolutionary pathways led to profound differences in sensitivity to the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, with ΔV3-X4A showing increased sensitivity relative to R3A and with ΔV3-X4B becoming completely resistant. These findings demonstrate the contributions that interactions with distinct coreceptor regions have in mediating tropism and drug sensitivity and illustrate how HIV''s remarkable evolutionary plasticity in adapting to selection pressures can be exploited to better understand its biological potential.     

The Globoside Receptor Triggers Structural Changes in the B19 Virus Capsid That Facilitate Virus Internalization

Globoside (Gb4Cer), Ku80 autoantigen, and α5β1 integrin have been identified as cell receptors/coreceptors for human parvovirus B19 (B19V), but their role and mechanism of interaction with the virus are largely unknown. In UT7/Epo cells, expression of Gb4Cer and CD49e (integrin alpha-5) was high, but expression of Ku80 was insignificant. B19V colocalized with Gb4Cer and, to a lesser extent, with CD49e. However, only anti-Gb4Cer antibodies could disturb virus attachment. Only a small proportion of cell-bound viruses were internalized, while the majority became detached from the receptor. When added to uninfected cells, the receptor-detached virus showed superior cell binding capacity and infectivity. Attachment of B19V to cells triggered conformational changes in the capsid leading to the accessibility of the N terminus of VP1 (VP1u) to antibodies, which was maintained in the receptor-detached virus. VP1u became similarly accessible to antibodies following incubation of B19V particles with increasing concentrations of purified Gb4Cer. The receptor-mediated exposure of VP1u is critical for virus internalization, since capsids lacking VP1 could bind to cells but were not internalized. Moreover, an antibody against the N terminus of VP1u disturbed virus internalization, but only when present during and not after virus attachment, indicating the involvement of this region in binding events required for internalization. These results suggest that Gb4Cer is not only the primary receptor for B19V attachment but also the mediator of capsid rearrangements required for subsequent interactions leading to virus internalization. The capacity of the virus to detach and reattach again would enhance the probability of productive infections.Human parvovirus B19 (B19V) belongs to the Erythrovirus genus of the Parvoviridae family. The virus has a worldwide distribution and typically causes a mild childhood febrile illness known as erythema infectiosum or fifth disease. In patients with underlying immunologic and hematologic disorders, B19V has been associated with more severe manifestations, such as arthropathies, aplastic anemia, hydrops fetalis, and fetal death (4).B19V has a single-stranded DNA genome encapsidated in a T=1 nonenveloped icosahedral capsid. The capsid is assembled from two structural proteins, VP1 (83 kDa) and VP2 (58 kDa). VP1 is identical to VP2, with the exception of 227 amino acids (aa) in the N-terminal part, the so-called VP1 unique region (VP1u) (9, 26). Despite VP1u being the minor component of the capsid, the dominant immune response against B19V is elicited by the VP1u region, which harbors strong neutralizing epitopes (2, 31, 41). A secreted phospholipase A₂ (PLA₂)-like activity has been located in the VP1 unique region of B19V (12), which is required for infection (13, 17, 40). Despite all these properties, we recently showed that VP1u is not accessible to antibodies. However, brief exposure to mild temperatures or low pH can render this region accessible (30). In this sense, B19V is similar to other parvoviruses in which VP1u is not accessible but can become exposed in vitro by mild heat or low-pH treatment (10, 21). In all parvoviruses tested so far, VP1u becomes exposed during the intracellular trafficking of the virus (18, 23, 28, 32, 33). However, B19V VP1u harbors strong neutralizing epitopes, meaning that its accessibility to antibody binding should occur prior to uptake by cells. In line with this hypothesis, we have demonstrated that incubation of B19V with red blood cells, which allow virus binding but not virus internalization, can trigger the externalization of VP1u in a proportion of the bound particles (3).The glycosphingolipid globoside (globotetraosylceramide [Gb4Cer]) is the cellular receptor of B19V (5, 6). Gb4Cer is largely expressed in human erythroid progenitor cells in the bone marrow, which are the main target cells for the virus. However, the pathogenicity and tropism of B19V cannot be explained if Gb4Cer is the only receptor. Previous studies have suggested that Gb4Cer is necessary for B19V to bind to cells but is not sufficient for cell entry (35). Subsequently, α5β1 integrin (36, 37) and the Ku80 autoantigen (25) were identified as coreceptors for B19V infection. While Ku80 might assist in virus attachment (25), α5β1 integrin is thought to be required for internalization (36, 37). In line with a complex mechanism of internalization based on multiple receptors is the observation that B19V does not stably bind membrane-associated globoside in vitro (20), indicating that B19V probably binds globoside jointly with other molecular structures present on cell membranes.In the present studies, the interaction of B19V with cell surface receptors and the implication of this interaction for the capsid structure were examined. The cells chosen for this study were of the erythropoietin (Epo)-dependent bone marrow megakaryoblastic leukemia UT7/Epo cell line, which is commonly used to study B19V infection. UT7/Epo cells support viral DNA replication and protein expression; however, intracellular factors limit the production of infectious progeny virus. The results indicate that B19V interacts dynamically with cell surface receptors and that internalization is a complex process involving sequential steps. B19V binds initially to Gb4Cer, which triggers the externalization of VP1u. The modified capsid is then ready for a subsequent interaction. Whenever the second interaction is not possible, the virus detaches from Gb4Cer and is ready for another attempt. This mechanism of “detachment-reattachment” is repeated until the required second interaction occurs, after which the virus is internalized.     

Genetic Characterization of Vibrio vulnificus Strains from Tilapia Aquaculture in Bangladesh

Outbreaks of Vibrio vulnificus wound infections in Israel were previously attributed to tilapia aquaculture. In this study, V. vulnificus was frequently isolated from coastal but not freshwater aquaculture in Bangladesh. Phylogenetic analyses showed that strains from Bangladesh differed remarkably from isolates commonly recovered elsewhere from fish or oysters and were more closely related to strains of clinical origin.Vibrio vulnificus causes severe wound infections and life-threatening septicemia (mortality, >50%), primarily in patients with underlying chronic diseases (10, 19, 23) and primarily from raw oyster consumption (21). This Gram-negative halophile is readily recovered from oysters (27, 35, 43) and fish (14) and was initially classified into two biotypes (BTs) based on growth characteristics and serology (5, 18, 39). Most human isolates are BT1, while BT2 is usually associated with diseased eels (1, 39). An outbreak of wound infections from aquacultured tilapia in Israel (6) revealed a new biotype (BT3). Phenotypic assays do not consistently distinguish biotypes (33), but genetic analyses have helped resolve relationships (20). A 10-locus multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme (8, 9) and a similar analysis of 6 loci (13) segregated V. vulnificus strains into two clusters. BT1 strains were in both clusters, while BT2 segregated into a single cluster and BT3 was a genetic mosaic of the two lineages. Significant associations were observed between MLST clusters and strain origin: most clinical strains (BT1) were in one cluster, and the other cluster was comprised mostly of environmental strains (some BT1 and all BT2). Clinical isolates were also associated with a unique genomic island (13).The relationship between genetic lineages and virulence has not been determined, and confirmed virulence genes are universally present in V. vulnificus strains from both clinical and environmental origins (19, 23). However, segregation of several polymorphic alleles agreed with the MLST analysis and correlated genotype with either clinical or environmental strain origin. Alleles include 16S rRNA loci (15, 26, 42), a virulence-correlated gene (vcg) locus (31, 41, 42), and repetitive sequence in the CPS operon (12). DiversiLab repetitive extrageneic palindromic (rep-PCR) analysis also confirmed these genetic distinctions and showed greater diversity among clinical strains (12).Wound infections associated with tilapia in Israel implicated aquaculture as a potential source of V. vulnificus in human disease (6, 40). Tilapia aquaculture is increasing rapidly, as shown by a 2.8-fold increase in tons produced from 1998 to 2007 (Food and Agriculture Organization; http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/en). Therefore, presence of V. vulnificus in tilapia aquaculture was examined in Bangladesh, a region that supports both coastal and freshwater sources of industrial-scale aquaculture. V. vulnificus strains were recovered from market fish, netted fish, and water samples, and the phylogenetic relationship among strains was examined relative to clinical and environmental reference strains collected elsewhere.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).