An Extracellular Loop of the Mannose Phosphotransferase System Component IIC Is Responsible for Specific Targeting by Class IIa Bacteriocins

Class IIa bacteriocins target a phylogenetically defined subgroup of mannose-phosphotransferase systems (man-PTS) on sensitive cells. By the use of man-PTS genes of the sensitive Listeria monocytogenes (mpt) and the nonsensitive Lactococcus lactis (ptn) species to rationally design a series of man-PTS chimeras and site-directed mutations, we identified an extracellular loop of the membrane-located protein MptC that was responsible for specific target recognition by the class IIa bacteriocins.Bacteriocins are small, ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides that normally kill bacteria closely related to the bacteriocin producers, but some also target a wider spectrum of bacteria, including a number of pathogens and food spoilage bacterial species (5, 28). Class IIa (pediocin-like) bacteriocins display a broad antimicrobial spectrum, including important pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus faecalis. These peptides consist of 37 to 48 nonmodified amino acids, contain a conserved pediocin-box sequence (Y-G-N-G-V/L) in the N-terminal region, and have defined secondary features in their structure: a cationic β sheet at the conserved N terminus and a helix-containing domain at the less-conserved C terminus (16, 30). Class IIa bacteriocins target sensitive cells by using the mannose phosphotransferase system (man-PTS) as a receptor (6, 10, 17, 19, 33). This sugar uptake system is the major glucose transporter for many bacteria, particularly Firmicutes and Gammaproteobacteria (39). Each man-PTS complex consists of four structural domains: IIC and IID, represented by two membrane-located proteins, and IIA and IIB, which are normally represented by a single cytoplasmic protein that can form reversible contacts with its membrane-located partners (31).It has previously been shown that coexpression of the IIC and IID genes is needed to confer sensitivity to class IIa bacteriocins as well as to the lactococcal bacteriocin lactococcin A and that the cytoplasmic IIAB partner is not involved in this process (10). However, while lactococcin A (belonging to class IIc) targets only the lactococcal man-PTS, the class IIa bacteriocins target man-PTSs of species of diverse genera (e.g., Listeria, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus) but somehow not those of the Lactococcus genus (24). This genus specificity has been recognized for almost 2 decades (20, 23, 26); still, the molecular nature underlying the specificity has remained very enigmatic. In the present report we clarify this issue by demonstrating that these two types of bacteriocins exhibit different binding patterns on their receptors: class IIa bacteriocins specifically interact with a defined region of 40 amino acids in the IIC protein whereas lactococcin A has a more complex interaction involving regions from both IIC and IID.     

Enterocin X,a Novel Two-Peptide Bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium KU-B5, Has an Antibacterial Spectrum Entirely Different from Those of Its Component Peptides

Enterocin X, composed of two antibacterial peptides (Xα and Xβ), is a novel class IIb bacteriocin from Enterococcus faecium KU-B5. When combined, Xα and Xβ display variably enhanced or reduced antibacterial activity toward a panel of indicators compared to each peptide individually. In E. faecium strains that produce enterocins A and B, such as KU-B5, only one additional bacteriocin had previously been known.Bacteriocins are gene-encoded antibacterial peptides and proteins. Because of their natural ability to preserve food, they are of particular interest to researchers in the food industry. Bacteriocins are grouped into three main classes according to their physical properties and compositions (11, 12). Of these, class IIb bacteriocins are thermostable non-lanthionine-containing two-peptide bacteriocins whose full antibacterial activity requires the interaction of two complementary peptides (8, 19). Therefore, two-peptide bacteriocins are considered to function together as one antibacterial entity (14).Enterocins A and B, first discovered and identified about 12 years ago (2, 3), are frequently present in Enterococcus faecium strains from various sources (3, 5, 6, 9, 13, 16). So far, no other bacteriocins have been identified in these strains, except the enterocin P-like bacteriocin from E. faecium JCM 5804^T (18). Here, we describe the characterization and genetic identification of enterocin X in E. faecium KU-B5. Enterocin X (identified after the enterocin P-like bacteriocin was discovered) is a newly found class IIb bacteriocin in E. faecium strains that produce enterocins A and B.     

Development of Bacteriocinogenic Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Heterologously Expressing and Secreting the Leaderless Enterocin L50 Peptides L50A and L50B from Enterococcus faecium L50

A segregationally stable expression and secretion vector for Saccharomyces cerevisiae, named pYABD01, was constructed by cloning the yeast gene region encoding the mating pheromone α-factor 1 secretion signal (MFα1_s) into the S. cerevisiae high-copy-number expression vector pYES2. The structural genes of the two leaderless peptides of enterocin L50 (EntL50A and EntL50B) from Enterococcus faecium L50 were cloned, separately (entL50A or entL50B) and together (entL50AB), into pYABD01 under the control of the galactose-inducible promoter P_GAL1. The generation of recombinant S. cerevisiae strains heterologously expressing and secreting biologically active EntL50A and EntL50B demonstrates the suitability of the MFα1_s-containing vector pYABD01 to direct processing and secretion of these antimicrobial peptides through the S. cerevisiae Sec system.Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely known for their ability to produce a variety of ribosomally synthesized proteins or peptides, referred to as bacteriocins, displaying antimicrobial activity against a broad range of gram-positive bacteria and, to a lesser extent, gram-negative bacteria, including spoilage and food-borne pathogenic microorganisms (11, 19, 33, 34, 36, 37). These antimicrobials may be classified into three main classes: (i) the lantibiotics, or posttranslationally modified peptides; (ii) the nonmodified, small, heat-stable peptides; and (iii) the large, heat-labile protein bacteriocins. Class II bacteriocins are further grouped into five subclasses: the subclass IIa (pediocin-like bacteriocins containing the N-terminal conserved motif YGNGVxC), the subclass IIb (two-peptide bacteriocins), the subclass IIc (leaderless bacteriocins), the subclass IId (circular bacteriocins), and the subclass IIe (other peptide bacteriocins) (17, 19, 21, 37). All lantibiotics and most class II bacteriocins are synthesized as biologically inactive precursors containing an N-terminal extension (the so-called double-glycine-type leader sequence or the Sec-dependent signal peptide), which is cleaved off concomitantly with externalization of biologically active bacteriocins by a dedicated ATP-binding cassette transporter and its accessory protein or by the Sec system and the signal peptidases, respectively (11, 17). Interestingly, only a few bacteriocins described to date are synthesized without an N-terminal extension, including enterocin L50 (L50A and L50B) (8), enterocin Q (EntQ) (10), enterocin EJ97 (41), and the bacteriocin LsbB (20).In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the application of bacteriocinogenic microorganisms and/or their bacteriocins as biopreservatives to guarantee the safety and quality of foods and beverages, such as fermented vegetables and meats, dairy and fish products, and wine and beer (12, 15, 16, 39, 47). Three main strategies for the use of bacteriocins as food biopreservatives have been proposed: (i) addition of a purified/semipurified bacteriocin preparation as a food additive; (ii) use of a substrate previously fermented by a bacteriocin-producing strain as a food ingredient; and/or (iii) inoculation of a culture to produce the bacteriocin in situ in fermented foods (13, 15). The lantibiotic nisin A is the most widely characterized bacteriocin and the only one that has been legally approved in more than 48 countries as a food additive for use in certain types of cheeses (13, 16). Likewise, nisin A has been approved as a beer additive in Australia and New Zealand (16). However, the difficulties encountered in addressing the regulatory approval of new bacteriocins as food additives have spurred the development of the other bacteriocin-based food biopreservation strategies (13, 17).Beer is a beverage with a remarkable microbiological stability and is considered as a food substrate difficult to spoil. However, some LAB, such as Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus lindneri, and Pediococcus damnosus, are able to spoil beer and are recognized as the most hazardous bacteria for breweries, being responsible for approximately 70% of microbial beer spoilage incidents (40, 47). The ever-growing consumer demand for less-processed and less chemically preserved foods and beverages is promoting the development of alternative biocontrol strategies, such as those based on the use of bacteriocins as biopreservatives (12, 15, 39, 47). However, beyond the strict requirements to fulfill legal regulations, the commercial application of bacteriocins as beer additives is hindered mainly by low bacteriocin production yields and increases in production costs (44). Considering that Saccharomyces cerevisiae is commonly used as starter culture for brewing (24, 28, 35), a novel beer biopreservation strategy based on the development of bactericidal S. cerevisiae brewing strains has been proposed to overcome the aforementioned challenges (44, 46, 47). In this respect, the heterologous production of LAB bacteriocins, namely, pediocin PA-1 (PedPA-1) from Pediococcus acidilactici PAC1.0 and plantaricin 423 from Lactobacillus plantarum 423, by laboratory strains of S. cerevisiae has been reported (44, 46).Enterocin L50 (EntL50) is a commonly found bacteriocin composed of two highly related leaderless antimicrobial peptides, enterocin L50A (EntL50A) and enterocin L50B (EntL50B), which possesses a broad antimicrobial spectrum against LAB, food-borne pathogenic bacteria, and human and animal clinical pathogens (8, 9, 10, 11). Previous work by our group showed that EntL50 (EntL50A and EntL50B) may be used as a beer biopreservative to inhibit the growth of beer spoilage bacteria (1). Therefore, genetically engineered strains of S. cerevisiae heterologously expressing and secreting EntL50A and EntL50B have been developed in this work. For this purpose, we constructed the segregationally stable expression and secretion vector pYABD01, which allowed the secretion of biologically active EntL50A and EntL50B directed by MFα1_s through the S. cerevisiae Sec system.     

DNA Sequencing and Homologous Expression of a Small Peptide Conferring Immunity to Gassericin A,a Circular Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus gasseri LA39

Gassericin A, produced by Lactobacillus gasseri LA39, is a hydrophobic circular bacteriocin. The DNA region surrounding the gassericin A structural gene, gaaA, was sequenced, and seven open reading frames (ORFs) of 3.5 kbp (gaaBCADITE) were found with possible functions in gassericin A production, secretion, and immunity. The deduced products of the five consecutive ORFs gaaADITE have homology to those of genes involved in butyrivibriocin AR10 production, although the genetic arrangements are different in the two circular bacteriocin genes. GaaI is a small, positively charged hydrophobic peptide of 53 amino acids containing a putative transmembrane segment. Heterologous expression and homologous expression of GaaI in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363 and L. gasseri JCM1131^T, respectively, were studied. GaaI-expressing strains exhibited at least sevenfold-higher resistance to gassericin A than corresponding control strains, indicating that gaaI encodes an immunity peptide for gassericin A. Comparison of GaaI to peptides with similar characteristics found in the circular bacteriocin gene loci is discussed.Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides that act primarily against related bacterial species. The classification of bacteriocins remains controversial. Here, we use the classification of Maqueda et al. (30): class I (lantibiotics); class II (nonlantibiotics) with subclasses IIa (antilisteral pediocin-like bacteriocins), IIb (two-peptide bacteriocins), and IIc (leaderless bacteriocins); class III (large heat-labile bacteriocins); and class IV (circular bacteriocins linked at the N- and C-terminal amino acids).Nine class IV circular bacteriocins have been reported to date. They can be further divided into two major groups by using their primary structures, biochemical characteristics, and genetic arrangements. One group is the family of enterocin AS-48 (32), the first circular bacteriocin described (in 1994), which includes circularin A (25) and uberolysin (40). The other group is the family of gassericin A (19, 21), the second bacteriocin found (in 1998), which includes acidocin B (28), reutericin 6 (with a primary structure 100% identical to that of gassericin A) (22, 23), butyrivibriocin AR10 (17), and carnocyclin A, from Carnobacterium maltaromaticum UAL307 (33). The lantibiotic-like subtilosin A produced by Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis strain 168 (24) is an orphan member of the class IV bacteriocins. The gassericin A family of bacteriocins have been isolated from various bacterial species in several countries, suggesting the bacteriocin genes may be associated with transferable genetic elements.The bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and bacteriocin-producing LAB strains isolated from foods are promising food preservative candidates, and strains of human origin are expected to be probiotics that could help to prevent the growth of harmful bacteria in food and the human intestine. Lactobacillus gasseri belongs to the Lactobacillus acidophilus group of LAB, which are natural inhabitants of the human intestinal tract (35), and many L. gasseri strains have been shown to produce bacteriocins (16, 20). Gassericin A was produced by L. gasseri LA39 isolated from the feces of a human infant; it has bactericidal activity against the food-borne pathogens Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, and Staphylococcus aureus (16). Recently, using proteose peptone, some strains of L. gasseri containing LA39 were successfully cultured in reconstituted skim milk and cheese whey, where L. gasseri LA39 produced gassericin A; these low-cost, safe media could be used to improve the safety of biopreservation (1). Gassericin A has been purified and characterized, and its structural gene (gaaA) has been cloned and sequenced (21, 22). Determination of the complete chemical structure of gassericin A showed that the bacteriocin belongs to class IV and consists of 58 amino acid residues linked at the N and C termini (19). Little is known about the mechanisms of secretion and circularization of gassericin A and immunity to the circular bacteriocin.Here, we sequenced six genes surrounding gaaA thought to be related to production of and immunity to gassericin A and examined the homologous and heterologous expression of a small hydrophobic peptide, GaaI; we found that gaaI is an immunity gene providing protection against gassericin A.     

Enterocin 96, a Novel Class II Bacteriocin Produced by Enterococcus faecalis WHE 96, Isolated from Munster Cheese

Enterococcus faecalis WHE 96, a strain isolated from soft cheese based on its anti-Listeria activity, produced a 5,494-Da bacteriocin that was purified to homogeneity by ultrafiltration and cation-exchange and reversed-phase chromatographies. The amino acid sequence of this bacteriocin, named enterocin 96, was determined by Edman degradation, and its structural gene was sequenced, revealing a double-glycine leader peptide. After a comparison with other bacteriocins, it was shown that enterocin 96 was a new class II bacteriocin that showed very little similarity with known structures. Enterocin 96 was indeed a new bacteriocin belonging to class II bacteriocins. The activity spectrum of enterocin 96 covered a wide range of bacteria, with strong activity against most gram-positive strains but very little or no activity against gram-negative strains.Bacteriocins are a heterogeneous group of ribosomally synthesized antibacterial peptides that inhibit strains and species that are usually, but not always, closely related to the producing bacteria (16). Enterococcal bacteriocins, often termed enterocins, have been widely investigated, mainly because they are active against gram-positive food-borne pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus cereus. The vast majority of enterocins are active only against gram-positive bacteria (10, 17); however, some exceptions with broad activity spectra described in recent years showed the ability to inhibit the growth of gram-negative microorganisms (5, 11, 13).The increasing number of enterocins reported in the literature and the emergence of novel structures that could not be included in classical bacteriocin classifications (12, 14, 17) prompted the grouping of enterocins into a new four-class scheme by Franz et al. (8). Most enterocins known so far were included in class II (small, nonlantibiotic peptides), which was divided into three subgroups: class II.1, enterocins of the pediocin family; class II.2, enterocins synthesized without a leader peptide; and class II.3, other linear, non-pediocin-like enterocins.The fact that numerous Enterococcus strains found in a variety of fermented and nonfermented foods produce bacteriocins, often more than one per strain, has sparked interest in their use in food preservation (4). Despite the concerns over enterococci as opportunistic pathogens and indicators of fecal contamination, they are indigenous species in the gastrointestinal tract and have long been used as human and/or animal probiotics (1, 2, 7).In this work, we describe and characterize a new class II enterocin produced by Enterococcus faecalis WHE 96, previously isolated from Munster cheese, for its anti-Listeria properties. The amino acid sequence, the structural gene, and the spectrum of activity of this bacteriocin are reported.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Specific Degradation of the Mucus Adhesion-Promoting Protein (MapA) of Lactobacillus reuteri to an Antimicrobial Peptide

The intestinal flora of mammals contains lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that may provide positive health effects for the host. Such bacteria are referred to as probiotic bacteria. From a pig, we have isolated a Lactobacillus reuteri strain that produces an antimicrobial peptide (AMP). The peptide was purified and characterized, and it was unequivocally shown that the AMP was a well-defined degradation product obtained from the mucus adhesion-promoting protein (MapA); it was therefore termed AP48-MapA. This finding demonstrates how large proteins might inherit unexpected pleiotropic functions by conferring antimicrobial capacities on the producer. The MapA/AP48-MapA system is the first example where a large protein of an intestinal LAB is shown to give rise to such an AMP. It is also of particular interest that the protein that provides this AMP is associated with the binding of the bacterium producing it to the surface/lining of the gut. This finding gives us new perspective on how some probiotic bacteria may successfully compete in this environment and thereby contribute to a healthy microbiota.Mammals have a microbiota in their digestive tract that contains lactic acid bacteria (LAB). It has been increasingly evident that some of these lactic acid bacteria produce antimicrobial peptides that may contribute to the positive effect on their host. Such bacteria are often referred to as probiotics, and one of their important beneficial effects is their ability to produce antimicrobial compounds that prevent or interfere with the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the host.It is known that the fecal microflora of pigs/piglets is large and diverse and develops rapidly after birth. Lactobacillus reuteri is among the very first lactic acid bacteria that colonize the intestine of new-born piglets, and their numbers gradually increase until they become the most dominant LAB in pigs (5, 17, 28). Other lactobacilli that are also part of the gut microbiota of pigs include L. amylovorus, L. acidophilus, L. salivarius, and L. casei (4, 8). Probiotic isolates have been identified within all these species, and many of them are today used as food/feed supplements to support good health (4, 11, 27). An important part of the antimicrobial arsenal produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is a group of peptides called bacteriocins, which are ribosomally synthesized antibiotic-like peptides (antimicrobial peptides [AMPs]) (3, 7, 19). The bacteriocins constitute a wide range of structurally different peptides that are divided into different classes and subclasses. Some are modified (the lantibiotics, or class I), while others are basically unmodified (class II) (3, 6, 19).Most bacteriocins are derived from prepeptides, each containing a short leader sequence (14 to 30 amino acids [aa]) which is cleaved off during the secretion of the mature peptide (19). In recent years, a new group of AMPs have been recognized (18); these are different from regular bacteriocins in that they are derived from larger proteins through specific degradations, leading to a defined peptide possessing antimicrobial activity. Such antimicrobial peptides have been known for a long time in mammalian systems. For instance, lactoferrin, a protein in milk, is readily degraded to a specific antimicrobial peptide through heat, acid treatment, or pepsin digestion (14, 24, 26). Defined histone fragments with antimicrobial properties have been isolated from different eukaryotic species (1, 2, 15, 21, 23), and a few antimicrobial peptides derived from larger proteins have been isolated in bacteria, including Helicobacter pylori (22), propionic acid bacteria (9, 10), and Clostridium beijerinckii (13). Such antimicrobial peptides are most likely formed by proteolytic degradation during cell proliferation or death.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Roles of Minor Pilin Subunits Spy0125 and Spy0130 in the Serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes Strain SF370

Adhesive pili on the surface of the serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes strain SF370 are composed of a major backbone subunit (Spy0128) and two minor subunits (Spy0125 and Spy0130), joined covalently by a pilin polymerase (Spy0129). Previous studies using recombinant proteins showed that both minor subunits bind to human pharyngeal (Detroit) cells (A. G. Manetti et al., Mol. Microbiol. 64:968-983, 2007), suggesting both may act as pilus-presented adhesins. While confirming these binding properties, studies described here indicate that Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role as a wall linker. Pili were localized predominantly to cell wall fractions of the wild-type S. pyogenes parent strain and a spy0125 deletion mutant. In contrast, they were found almost exclusively in culture supernatants in both spy0130 and srtA deletion mutants, indicating that the housekeeping sortase (SrtA) attaches pili to the cell wall by using Spy0130 as a linker protein. Adhesion assays with antisera specific for individual subunits showed that only anti-rSpy0125 serum inhibited adhesion of wild-type S. pyogenes to human keratinocytes and tonsil epithelium to a significant extent. Spy0125 was localized to the tip of pili, based on a combination of mutant analysis and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of purified pili. Assays comparing parent and mutant strains confirmed its role as the adhesin. Unexpectedly, apparent spontaneous cleavage of a labile, proline-rich (8 of 14 residues) sequence separating the N-terminal ∼1/3 and C-terminal ∼2/3 of Spy0125 leads to loss of the N-terminal region, but analysis of internal spy0125 deletion mutants confirmed that this has no significant effect on adhesion.The group A Streptococcus (S. pyogenes) is an exclusively human pathogen that commonly colonizes either the pharynx or skin, where local spread can give rise to various inflammatory conditions such as pharyngitis, tonsillitis, sinusitis, or erysipelas. Although often mild and self-limiting, GAS infections are occasionally very severe and sometimes lead to life-threatening diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis or streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. A wide variety of cell surface components and extracellular products have been shown or suggested to play important roles in S. pyogenes virulence, including cell surface pili (1, 6, 32). Pili expressed by the serotype M1 S. pyogenes strain SF370 mediate specific adhesion to intact human tonsil epithelia and to primary human keratinocytes, as well as cultured keratinocyte-derived HaCaT cells, but not to Hep-2 or A549 cells (1). They also contribute to adhesion to a human pharyngeal cell line (Detroit cells) and to biofilm formation (29).Over the past 5 years, pili have been discovered on an increasing number of important Gram-positive bacterial pathogens, including Bacillus cereus (4), Bacillus anthracis (4, 5), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (13, 14, 19, 26, 27, 44, 46, 47), Streptococcus agalactiae (7, 23, 38), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (2, 3, 24, 25, 34), as well as S. pyogenes (1, 29, 32). All these species produce pili that are composed of a single major subunit plus either one or two minor subunits. During assembly, the individual subunits are covalently linked to each other via intermolecular isopeptide bonds, catalyzed by specialized membrane-associated transpeptidases that may be described as pilin polymerases (4, 7, 25, 41, 44, 46). These are related to the classical housekeeping sortase (usually, but not always, designated SrtA) that is responsible for anchoring many proteins to Gram-positive bacterial cell walls (30, 31, 33). The C-terminal ends of sortase target proteins include a cell wall sorting (CWS) motif consisting, in most cases, of Leu-Pro-X-Thr-Gly (LPXTG, where X can be any amino acid) (11, 40). Sortases cleave this substrate between the Thr and Gly residues and produce an intermolecular isopeptide bond linking the Thr to a free amino group provided by a specific target. In attaching proteins to the cell wall, the target amino group is provided by the lipid II peptidoglycan precursor (30, 36, 40). In joining pilus subunits, the target is the ɛ-amino group in the side chain of a specific Lys residue in the second subunit (14, 18, 19). Current models of pilus biogenesis envisage repeated transpeptidation reactions adding additional subunits to the base of the growing pilus, until the terminal subunit is eventually linked covalently via an intermolecular isopeptide bond to the cell wall (28, 41, 45).The major subunit (sometimes called the backbone or shaft subunit) extends along the length of the pilus and appears to play a structural role, while minor subunits have been detected either at the tip, the base, and/or at occasional intervals along the shaft, depending on the species (4, 23, 24, 32, 47). In S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae one of the minor subunits acts as an adhesin, while the second appears to act as a linker between the base of the assembled pilus and the cell wall (7, 15, 22, 34, 35). It was originally suggested that both minor subunits of C. diphtheriae pili could act as adhesins (27). However, recent data showed one of these has a wall linker role (26, 44) and may therefore not function as an adhesin.S. pyogenes strain SF370 pili are composed of a major (backbone) subunit, termed Spy0128, plus two minor subunits, called Spy0125 and Spy0130 (1, 32). All three are required for efficient adhesion to target cells (1). Studies employing purified recombinant proteins have shown that both of the minor subunits, but not the major subunit, bind to Detroit cells (29), suggesting both might act as pilus-presented adhesins. Here we report studies employing a combination of recombinant proteins, specific antisera, and allelic replacement mutants which show that only Spy0125 is the pilus-presented adhesin and that Spy0130 has a distinct role in linking pili to the cell wall.     

Conjugative Plasmid from Lactobacillus gasseri LA39 That Carries Genes for Production of and Immunity to the Circular Bacteriocin Gassericin A

Gassericin A is a circular bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus gasseri strain LA39. We found a 33,333-bp plasmid, designated pLgLA39, in this strain. pLgLA39 contained 44 open reading frames, including seven genes related to gassericin A production/immunity (gaa), as well as genes for replication, plasmid maintenance, and conjugative transfer. pLgLA39 was transferred from LA39 to the type strain of L. gasseri (JCM 1131) by filter mating. The transconjugant exhibited >30-fold-higher more resistance to gassericin A and produced antibacterial activity. Lactobacillus reuteri LA6, the producer of reutericin 6, was proved to harbor a plasmid indistinguishable from pLgLA39 and carrying seven genes 100% identical to gaa. This suggests that pLgLA39 might have been transferred naturally between L. gasseri LA39 and L. reuteri LA6. The seven gaa genes of pLgLA39 were cloned into a plasmid vector to construct pGAA. JCM 1131^T transformed with pGAA expressed antibacterial activity and resistance to gassericin A. pGAA was segregationally more stable than a pGAA derivative plasmid from which gaaA was deleted and even was more stable than the vector. This suggests the occurrence of postsegregational host killing by the gaa genes. pLgLA39 carried a pemIK homolog, and segregational stabilization of a plasmid by the pLgLA39-type pemIK genes was also confirmed. Thus, pLgLA39 was proved to carry the genes for at least two plasmid maintenance mechanisms, i.e., gaa and pemIK. Plasmids containing a repA gene similar to pLgLA39 repA were distributed in several L. gasseri strains.Lactobacillus species are normal inhabitants of the human gastrointestinal tract, and Lactobacillus gasseri is one of the most commonly detected of these species (37, 47). Health-promoting effects of this species, such as immunomodulation (35), suppression of Helicobacter pylori-induced interleukin-8 production (44), and improvement of intestinal conditions (34), have been reported, and some L. gasseri strains are used in commercial probiotic products.Bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides, proteins, or protein complexes produced by bacteria and active mainly against related bacterial species (38). Several bacteriocins also inhibit the growth of food-borne pathogens, such as Listeria, Bacillus cereus, and Clostridium perfringens. Production of bacteriocin is thought to be a desired feature for probiotic strains, since bacteriocin is believed to provide an advantage for survival in the ecological niche and to prevent the growth of pathogens. Several L. gasseri strains are known to produce bacteriocins (18). The classification of bacteriocins remains controversial. We use the definition proposed by Maqueda et al. (30), where bacteriocins are classified into class I (lantibiotics), class II (nonlantibiotics), class III (large heat-labile bacteriocins), and class IV (circular bacteriocins linked at the N- and C-terminal ends). Among these, the class IV circular bacteriocins have attracted increasing attention, since they are the simplest prokaryotic representatives of the ubiquitous circular peptides with various physiological activities (6). Enterocin AS-48 from Enterococcus faecalis strain S-48 is the first and most vigorously characterized member of the class IV bacteriocins (30). L. gasseri strain LA39 (JCM 11657) produces a 58-amino-acid (aa) circular bacteriocin, gassericin A (18). Gassericin A is a representative of the non-AS-48-like circular bacteriocin group including butyrivibriocin AR10 from Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens AR10 (15) and carnocyclin A from Carnobacterium maltaromaticum UAL307 (32), as well as reutericin 6 from Lactobacillus reuteri LA6 (17) and acidocin B from Lactobacillus acidophilus M46 (26). The last two bacteriocins have nearly identical amino acid sequences to that of gassericin A. Though the number of reported circular bacteriocins has been increasing, their primary sequences and the genes responsible for production of and immunity to them are diversified (for a review, see reference 31). Recently, we isolated and sequenced seven genes (gaaBCADITE) from LA39 deduced to be responsible for production of and immunity to gassericin A (20). The gaa genes add new information to the complex world of the class IV bacteriocin genes.The structural gene of gassericin A, gaaA, was reported to be located on the chromosome of LA39 (19). However, the high amino acid sequence identity of gassericin A to reutericin 6 (100%) and to acidocin B (98%) suggests recent horizontal gene transfers of the relevant bacteriocin genes, possibly via mobile elements. In fact, the acidocin B genes were reported to be located on a plasmid, namely, pCV461 (26). Many Lactobacillus strains are known to harbor one or more plasmids of various sizes, and several Lactobacillus plasmids have been reported to contain genes for production of bacteriocins (48). To our knowledge, however, only three have been sequenced entirely: these are pLA103 from Lactobacillus acidophilus TK8912 (16), pRC18 from Lactobacillus curvatus (previously known as Lactobacillus casei) CRL705 (7), and pMP118 from Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. salivarius UCC118 (5). Thus, genetic information about bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus plasmids is still limited. Furthermore, little has been known about plasmids of L. gasseri, even though the existence of plasmids in a few strains has been reported, including a 26.5-kb anonymous plasmid in strain ADH (27) and pK7 in strain K7 (28).Here we describe a 33.3-kb plasmid, designated pLgLA39, from L. gasseri LA39. The gaa genes are located on this plasmid. pLgLA39 carries a set of genes for conjugative transfer and was shown to be transmitted to another L. gasseri strain. L. reuteri LA6 also harbors a plasmid almost identical to pLgLA39. We demonstrated that production of gassericin A increased the apparent segregational stability of a plasmid carrying the gaa genes. A pemIK homolog in pLgLA39 was also functional as a plasmid-stabilizing mechanism. This is the first report describing the entire nucleotide sequence and detailed genetic analysis of an L. gasseri plasmid, which contains functional genes for circular bacteriocin production, conjugation, and plasmid maintenance.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.