Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein E Mediates Retrograde Spread from Epithelial Cells to Neurites

In animal models of infection, glycoprotein E (gE) is required for efficient herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (retrograde direction). Retrograde spread in vivo is a multistep process, in that HSV-1 first spreads between epithelial cells at the inoculation site, then infects neurites, and finally travels by retrograde axonal transport to the neuron cell body. To better understand the role of gE in retrograde spread, we used a compartmentalized neuron culture system, in which neurons were infected in the presence or absence of epithelial cells. We found that gE-deleted HSV-1 (NS-gEnull) retained retrograde axonal transport activity when added directly to neurites, in contrast to the retrograde spread defect of this virus in animals. To better mimic the in vivo milieu, we overlaid neurites with epithelial cells prior to infection. In this modified system, virus infects epithelial cells and then spreads to neurites, revealing a 100-fold retrograde spread defect for NS-gEnull. We measured the retrograde spread defect of NS-gEnull from a variety of epithelial cell lines and found that the magnitude of the spread defect from epithelial cells to neurons correlated with epithelial cell plaque size defect, indicating that gE plays a similar role in both types of spread. Therefore, gE-mediated spread between epithelial cells and neurites likely explains the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in vivo.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is an alphaherpesvirus that characteristically infects skin and mucosal surfaces before spreading to sensory neurons, where it establishes a lifelong persistent infection. The virus periodically returns to the periphery via sensory axons and causes recurrent lesions as well as asymptomatic shedding. This life cycle requires viral transport along axons in two directions: toward the neuron cell body (retrograde direction) and away from the neuron cell body (anterograde direction).Many studies of alphaherpesvirus neuronal spread have focused on pseudorabies virus (PRV), a virus whose natural host is the pig. Three PRV proteins, glycoprotein E (gE), gI, and Us9, have been shown to mediate anterograde neuronal spread both in animal models of infection and in cultured neurons. However, these three proteins are dispensable for retrograde spread (3, 8, 11, 12, 31, 46). In contrast, numerous animal models of infection have shown that HSV-1 gE is required for retrograde spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (4, 9, 44, 56). In the murine flank model, wild-type (WT) virus replicates in the skin and then infects sensory neurons and spreads in a retrograde direction to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). In this model, gE-deleted HSV-1 replicates in the skin but is not detected in the DRG (9, 44). This phenotype differs from gE-deleted PRV, which is able to reach the DRG at WT levels (8). Thus, unlike PRV, gE-deleted HSV-1 viruses have a retrograde spread defect in vivo.HSV-1 gE is a 552-amino-acid type I membrane protein found in the virion membrane as well as in the trans-Golgi and plasma membranes of infected cells (1). gE forms a heterodimer with another viral glycoprotein, gI. The gE/gI complex is important for HSV-1 immune evasion through its Fc receptor activity. gE/gI binds to the Fc domain of antibodies directed against other viral proteins, sequestering these antibodies and blocking antibody effector functions (27, 32, 40). Additionally, gE/gI promotes spread between epithelial cells. Viruses lacking either gE or gI form characteristically small plaques in cell culture and small inoculation site lesions in mice (4, 9, 18, 40, 58). In animal models, gE and gI also mediate viral spread in both anterograde and retrograde directions (4, 19, 44, 56).In order to better understand the role of gE in HSV-1 retrograde neuronal spread, we employed a compartmentalized neuron culture system that has been used to study directional neuronal spread of PRV and West Nile virus (12, 14, 45). In the Campenot chamber system, neurites are contained in a compartment that is separate from their corresponding cell bodies. Therefore, spread in an exclusively retrograde direction can be measured by infecting neurites and detecting spread to neuron cell bodies.HSV-1 replication requires retrograde transport of incoming viral genomes to the nucleus. In neurites, fusion between viral and cellular membranes occurs at the plasma membrane (43, 48). Upon membrane fusion, the capsid and a subset of tegument proteins (the inner tegument) dissociate from glycoproteins and outer tegument proteins, which remain at the plasma membrane (28, 38). Unenveloped capsids and the associated inner tegument proteins are then transported in the retrograde direction to the nucleus (7, 48, 49).For both neurons and epithelial cells, retrograde transport is dependent upon microtubules, ATP, the retrograde microtubule motor dynein, and the dynein cofactor dynactin (22, 34, 49, 52). Several viral proteins interact with components of the dynein motor complex (23, 39, 60). However, none of these proteins suggest a completely satisfactory mechanism by which viral retrograde transport occurs, either because they are not components of the complex that is transported to the nucleus (UL34, UL9, VP11/12) or because capsids lacking that protein retain retrograde transport activity (VP26) (2, 17, 21, 28, 37). This implies that additional viral proteins are involved in retrograde trafficking.We sought to better characterize the role of gE in retrograde spread and found that gE is dispensable for retrograde axonal transport; however, it promotes HSV-1 spread from epithelial cells to neurites. This epithelial cell-to-neuron spread defect provides a plausible explanation for the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in animal models of infection.     

Comparison of the Pseudorabies Virus Us9 Protein with Homologs from Other Veterinary and Human Alphaherpesviruses

Pseudorabies virus (PRV) Us9 is a small, tail-anchored (TA) membrane protein that is essential for axonal sorting of viral structural proteins and is highly conserved among other members of the alphaherpesvirus subfamily. We cloned the Us9 homologs from two human pathogens, varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), as well as two veterinary pathogens, equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) and bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1), and fused them to enhanced green fluorescent protein to examine their subcellular localization and membrane topology. Akin to PRV Us9, all of the Us9 homologs localized to the trans-Golgi network and had a type II membrane topology (typical of TA proteins). Furthermore, we examined whether any of the Us9 homologs could compensate for the loss of PRV Us9 in anterograde, neuron-to-cell spread of infection in a compartmented chamber system. EHV-1 and BHV-1 Us9 were able to fully compensate for the loss of PRV Us9, whereas VZV and HSV-1 Us9 proteins were unable to functionally replace PRV Us9 when they were expressed in a PRV background.Alphaherpesviruses are classified by their variable host range, short reproductive cycle, and ability to establish latency in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) (36, 37). Commonly studied pathogens of this subfamily include herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV), as well as the veterinary pathogens pseudorabies virus (PRV), equine herpesvirus (EHV), and bovine herpesvirus (BHV). Initial infection begins with the virus entering the host mucosal surfaces and spreading between cells of the mucosal epithelium. Invariably, virus enters the PNS through the infection of peripheral nerves that innervate this region. The virus establishes a latent infection in PNS neurons that can be reactivated and that persists for the life of the host (36). In most natural infections, virus replication in the PNS never spreads to the central nervous system (CNS). However, on rare occasions, invasion of the CNS does occur, resulting in devastating encephalitis (46). Trafficking of virus particles from infected epithelial cells into the axon and subsequent transport to neuronal cell bodies is known as retrograde spread of infection. Trafficking of virus particles that are assembled in the neuronal cell body and subsequently sorted into axons for transport to epithelial cells at the initial site of infection (upon reactivation from latency) is known as anterograde spread of infection.Though the natural host of PRV is swine, the virus infects a wide variety of animals, including rodents, cats, dogs, rabbits, cattle, and chicken embryos, but not higher primates (1, 30, 47). In contrast to the well-contained spread of PRV within its natural host, infection of other mammals is usually lethal. Instead of stopping in the PNS, infection continues on to second-order and third-order neurons in the CNS (reviewed in reference 35). This facet of PRV infection makes it a useful tracer of neuronal connections (18). Work in our lab has identified three PRV proteins, Us9 and the gE/gI heterodimer, which are critical for efficient anterograde spread of infection in vivo (i.e., spread from presynaptic to postsynaptic neurons) (6, 45). The molecular mechanism by which these proteins function has been further elucidated in vitro using primary neuronal cultures of superior cervical ganglion (SCG) harvested from embryonic rat pups. PRV Us9 and, to a lesser extent, gE/gI are required for efficient axonal targeting of viral structural proteins, a necessary step for subsequent anterograde, transneuronal spread (10, 11, 27, 28, 42).PRV Us9 is a type II, tail-anchored (TA) membrane protein that is highly enriched in lipid raft microdomains and resides predominantly in or near the trans-Golgi network (TGN) inside infected cells (5-7, 27). It has homologs in most of the alphaherpesviruses, including VZV (16), HSV-1 (22), HSV-2 (17), EHV-1 (21, 40), EHV-4 (41), BHV-1 (25), and BHV-5 (14). Though several studies have examined individually the Us9 proteins encoded by VZV (16), HSV-1 (4, 22, 34, 39), BHV-1 (13), and BHV-5 (14), several gaps in our understanding of Us9 biology remain, namely, whether all of the PRV Us9 homologs are type II membrane proteins, if the proteins localize to similar subcellular compartments within different cell types, and if they can functionally substitute for the loss of PRV Us9 in axonal sorting and anterograde spread of infection. The aim of this study is to examine PRV Us9 in parallel assays with its homologs from VZV, HSV-1, EHV-1, and BHV-1 to identify potential similarities and differences between these highly conserved alphaherpesvirus proteins.     

Virion-Incorporated Glycoprotein B Mediates Transneuronal Spread of Pseudorabies Virus

Transneuronal spread of pseudorabies virus (PRV) is a multistep process that requires several virally encoded proteins. Previous studies have shown that PRV glycoprotein B (gB), a component of the viral fusion machinery, is required for the transmission of infection to postsynaptic, second-order neurons. We sought to identify the gB-mediated step in viral transmission. We determined that gB is not required for the sorting of virions into axons of infected neurons, anterograde transport, or the release of virions from the axon. trans or cis expression of gB on the cell surface was not sufficient for transneuronal spread of the virus; instead, efficient incorporation of gB into virions was required. Additionally, neuron-to-cell spread of PRV most likely does not proceed through syncytial connections. We conclude that, upon gB-independent release of virions at the site of neuron-cell contacts, the virion-incorporated gB/gH/gL fusion complex mediates entry into the axonally contacted cell by fusion of the closely apposed membranes.Alphaherpesviruses, which constitute a subfamily of the family Herpesviridae, include the human pathogens herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus and the swine pathogen pseudorabies virus (PRV). These closely related pantropic, neuroinvasive viruses establish latency in the peripheral nervous systems of their natural hosts. During the normal course of infection, periodic viral reactivation leads to recurrent epithelial lesions (38). Although rare in the natural host, transneuronal spread of the virus from the peripheral to the central nervous system (CNS) results in death or debilitating disease, such as encephalitis or keratitis (50). Nonnatural hosts infected with PRV almost invariably experience viral spread to the CNS and succumb to infection (36).Transneuronal spread of alphaherpesviruses is an incompletely understood multistep process that requires the concerted action of viral and cellular proteins. Following replication in the soma of an infected neuron, viral progeny may spread in the retrograde direction to the presynaptic cell or anterogradely to the postsynaptic cell. During anterograde spread of PRV, virus particles are sorted from the neuronal soma into the cognate axon. Upon entering the axonal compartment, virions are transported in a microtubule-dependent manner toward the synaptically connected cell (41). Recent in vitro evidence suggests that boutons en passant and axon termini serve as sites for PRV spread from the axon (13). Additionally, in vivo experiments demonstrate that the transneuronal spread of alphaherpesviruses is remarkably specific, occurring only between synaptically connected cells (15). This property has made alphaherpesviruses invaluable as neural circuit tracers in studies that aim to map the synaptic architecture of the CNS (14). However, the mechanisms that confer such specificity on the spread of infection are not well understood.The study of mechanisms underlying PRV trafficking revealed that the virally encoded membrane proteins Us9, glycoprotein E (gE), and gI are required for the efficient sorting of virions from an infected neuronal cell body into its cognate axon (6, 26, 29, 44, 49). Therefore, in the absence of any of these proteins, infection cannot be transmitted efficiently from a presynaptic to a postsynaptic cell (3, 23). Another viral membrane protein required for the transneuronal spread of PRV is gB (2, 21). Along with gH and gL, this 913-amino-acid type I viral membrane protein is part of the viral fusion machinery, and it is essential for infection by free virions and for cell-to-cell spread in epithelial cultures (25, 35, 37). gB is the most highly conserved glycoprotein in the family Herpesviridae. X-ray crystallography of the HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB ectodomain revealed a trimeric structure with a high degree of homology to fusion protein G of vesicular stomatitis virus (22). By homology to vesicular stomatitis virus fusion protein G, the ectodomain of gB is predicted to contain fusion loops; indeed, mutation of these regions in HSV-1 gB inhibits its fusion function (20). Mutagenesis of the gB cytoplasmic tail in HSV-1 and PRV revealed its role in the regulation of the fusion function, virion incorporation of gB, and interactions with cellular adaptor proteins (16, 32, 34, 48; summarized in reference 39). Tyrosine motif-mediated interaction of PRV gB with adaptor protein 2 leads to its clathrin-dependent internalization (48). In polarized epithelial cells, gB is targeted to the basolateral surface, presumably via interactions of its cytoplasmic tail with adaptor protein 1B. The basolateral sorting of gB is hypothesized to enhance the efficiency of direct cell-to-cell spread of the virus (16).While its requirement for transneuronal spread is known, the function that gB performs in this process has not been identified. The block in the transmission of gB-null PRV infection from a neuron to an axonally contacted cell may occur during viral trafficking in the neuron, egress from the axon, or entry into the postsynaptic cell. We investigated whether gB participates in the axonal targeting of newly synthesized virions. Our imaging data revealed that gB is not required for axonal sorting of PRV, placing gB function downstream of Us9, gE, and gI. Further experiments showed that gB is not required for virion egress from the infected neuron and that neuron-to-cell spread of PRV does not proceed through syncytia. Importantly, incorporation of gB into virions was required for efficient spread of infection. We conclude that PRV virions are released from axons in a gB-independent manner and enter the postsynaptic cell at synaptic contacts by gB-mediated fusion of the closely apposed viral and cellular membranes.     

Effects of Phosphorylation of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Envelope Glycoprotein B by Us3 Kinase In Vivo and In Vitro

We recently reported that the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) Us3 protein kinase phosphorylates threonine at position 887 (Thr-887) in the cytoplasmic tail of envelope glycoprotein B (gB) (A. Kato, J. Arii, I. Shiratori, H. Akashi, H. Arase, and Y. Kawaguchi, J. Virol. 83:250-261, 2009; T. Wisner, C. C. Wright, A. Kato, Y. Kawaguchi, F. Mou, J. D. Baines, R. J. Roller and D. C. Johnson, J. Virol. 83:3115-3126, 2009). In the studies reported here, we examined the effect(s) of this phosphorylation on viral replication and pathogenesis in vivo and present data showing that replacement of gB Thr-887 by alanine significantly reduced viral replication in the mouse cornea and development of herpes stroma keratitis and periocular skin disease in mice. The same effects have been reported for mice infected with a recombinant HSV-1 carrying a kinase-inactive mutant of Us3. These observations suggested that Us3 phosphorylation of gB Thr-887 played a critical role in viral replication in vivo and in HSV-1 pathogenesis. In addition, we generated a monoclonal antibody that specifically reacted with phosphorylated gB Thr-887 and used this antibody to show that Us3 phosphorylation of gB Thr-887 regulated subcellular localization of gB, particularly on the cell surface of infected cells.The herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) Us3 gene encodes a serine/threonine protein kinase with an amino acid sequence that is conserved in the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae (9, 20, 29). The Us3 kinase phosphorylation target site has been reported to be similar to that of protein kinase A (PKA), a cellular cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (3, 12). Us3 catalytic activity plays important roles in viral replication and pathogenesis in vivo, based on studies showing that recombinant Us3 null mutant viruses and recombinant viruses encoding catalytically inactive Us3 have significantly reduced virulence, pathogenicity, and replication in mouse models (21, 34). In contrast, Us3 is not essential for growth in tissue culture cells (29). Thus, recombinant Us3 mutants grow as well as wild-type virus in Vero cells and have modestly impaired growth in a specific cell line such as HEp-2 cells (32, 33). The catalytic activity of Us3 is, in part, regulated by autophosphorylation of its serine at position 147 (Ser-147), and regulation of Us3 activity by autophosphorylation of Ser-147 appears to play a critical role in HSV-1 replication in vivo and in HSV-1 pathogenesis (34). Numerous studies have elucidated the potential downstream effects of Us3, including blocking apoptosis (18, 26-28), promoting nuclear egress of progeny nucleocapsids through the nuclear membrane (24, 32, 33), redistributing and phosphorylating nuclear membrane-associated viral nuclear egress factors UL31 and UL34 (13, 24, 30, 31) and cellular proteins including lamin A/C and emerin (16, 22, 23), controlling infected cell morphology (12, 27), and downregulating cell surface expression of viral envelope glycoprotein B (gB) (11).Two substrates that mediate some of the Us3 functions described above have been identified. First, it has been shown that Us3 phosphorylates Thr-887 in the cytoplasmic tail of gB, which appears to downregulate cell surface expression of gB (11). This conclusion is based on the observation that a T887A mutation in gB (gB-T887A) markedly upregulated cell surface expression of gB in infected cells: this upregulation was also observed with a recombinant virus encoding a Us3 kinase-inactive mutant, whereas a phosphomimetic substitution for gB Thr-887 restored wild-type cell surface expression of gB (11). Us3 phosphorylation of gB Thr-887 has also been proposed to be involved in regulation of fusion of the nascent progeny virion envelope with the cell''s outer nuclear membrane, based on the observation that virions accumulated aberrantly in the perinuclear space in cells infected with a mutant virus carrying the gB-T887A substitution mutation and lacking the capacity to produce gH (42). Second, it has been shown that Us3 may phosphorylate some or all of the six serines in the UL31 N-terminal region (24). Such phosphorylation might regulate proper localization of UL31 and UL34 at the nuclear membrane, nuclear egress of nucleocapsids, and viral growth in cell cultures since the Us3 kinase-inactive mutant phenotype for nuclear egress (i.e., mislocalization of UL31 and UL34 at the nuclear membrane, aberrant accumulation of virions within herniations of the nuclear membrane, and decreased viral growth in cell cultures) is also produced by replacement of the six serines in the UL31 N-terminal region with alanines while phosphomimetic substitutions of the six serines restored the wild-type phenotype (24).Thus, the molecular mechanisms for some of the downstream effects of Us3 phosphorylation have been gradually elucidated. However, it remains to be shown whether the Us3 functions reported to date are in fact involved in viral replication and pathogenicity in vivo. In the present study, we focused on Us3 phosphorylation of gB Thr-887 and examined the effect(s) of this phosphorylation on viral replication and pathogenesis in vivo. These studies have shown that replacement of gB Thr-887 by alanine significantly reduced viral replication in the mouse cornea and development of herpes stroma keratitis (HSK) and periocular skin disease in mice, as reported for infection of mice with a recombinant virus carrying a Us3 kinase-inactive mutant (34). These observations suggested that Us3 phosphorylation of gB Thr-887 played a critical role in viral replication in vivo and in HSV-1 pathogenesis. In addition, we generated a monoclonal antibody that specifically recognized phosphorylated gB Thr-887 and used this antibody to directly study the functional consequences of Us3 phosphorylation of gB Thr-887 in infected cells. We also present data showing that Us3 phosphorylation of gB Thr-887 regulated subcellular localization of gB, particularly gB localization on the cell surface of infected cells.     

Characterization of Lassa Virus Glycoprotein Oligomerization and Influence of Cholesterol on Virus Replication

Mature glycoprotein spikes are inserted in the Lassa virus envelope and consist of the distal subunit GP-1, the transmembrane-spanning subunit GP-2, and the signal peptide, which originate from the precursor glycoprotein pre-GP-C by proteolytic processing. In this study, we analyzed the oligomeric structure of the viral surface glycoprotein. Chemical cross-linking studies of mature glycoprotein spikes from purified virus revealed the formation of trimers. Interestingly, sucrose density gradient analysis of cellularly expressed glycoprotein showed that in contrast to trimeric mature glycoprotein complexes, the noncleaved glycoprotein forms monomers and oligomers spanning a wide size range, indicating that maturation cleavage of GP by the cellular subtilase SKI-1/S1P is critical for formation of the correct oligomeric state. To shed light on a potential relation between cholesterol and GP trimer stability, we performed cholesterol depletion experiments. Although depletion of cholesterol had no effect on trimerization of the glycoprotein spike complex, our studies revealed that the cholesterol content of the viral envelope is important for the infectivity of Lassa virus. Analyses of the distribution of viral proteins in cholesterol-rich detergent-resistant membrane areas showed that Lassa virus buds from membrane areas other than those responsible for impaired infectivity due to cholesterol depletion of lipid rafts. Thus, derivation of the viral envelope from cholesterol-rich membrane areas is not a prerequisite for the impact of cholesterol on virus infectivity.Lassa virus (LASV) is a member of the family Arenaviridae, of which Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) is the prototype. Arenaviruses comprise more than 20 species, divided into the Old World and New World virus complexes (19). The Old World arenaviruses include the human pathogenic LASV strains, Lujo virus, which was first identified in late 2008 and is associated with an unprecedented high case fatality rate in humans, the nonhuman pathogenic Ippy, Mobala, and Mopeia viruses, and the recently described Kodoko virus (10, 30, 49). The New World virus complex contains, among others, the South American hemorrhagic fever-causing viruses Junín virus, Machupo virus, Guanarito virus, Sabiá virus, and the recently discovered Chapare virus (22).Arenaviruses contain a bisegmented single-stranded RNA genome encoding the polymerase L, matrix protein Z, nucleoprotein NP, and glycoprotein GP. The bipartite ribonucleoprotein of LASV is surrounded by a lipid envelope derived from the plasma membrane of the host cell. The matrix protein Z has been identified as a major budding factor, which lines the interior of the viral lipid membrane, in which GP spikes are inserted (61, 75). The glycoprotein is synthesized as precursor protein pre-GP-C and is cotranslationally cleaved by signal peptidase into GP-C and the signal peptide, which exhibits unusual length, stability, and topology (3, 27, 28, 33, 70, 87). Moreover, the arenaviral signal peptide functions as trans-acting maturation factor (2, 26, 33). After processing by signal peptidase, GP-C of both New World and Old World arenaviruses is cleaved by the cellular subtilase subtilisin kexin isozyme-1/site-1 protease (SKI-1/S1P) into the distal subunit GP-1 and the membrane-anchored subunit GP-2 within the secretory pathway (5, 52, 63). For LCMV, it has been shown that GP-1 subunits are linked to each other by disulfide bonds and are noncovalently connected to GP-2 subunits (14, 24, 31). GP-1 is responsible for binding to the host cell receptor, while GP-2 mediates fusion between the virus envelope and the endosomal membrane at low pH due to a bipartite fusion peptide near the amino terminus (24, 36, 44). Sequence analysis of the LCMV GP-2 ectodomain revealed two heptad repeats that most likely form amphipathic helices important for this process (34, 86).In general, viral class I fusion proteins have triplets of α-helical structures in common, which contain heptad repeats (47, 73). In contrast, class II fusion proteins are characterized by β-sheets that form dimers in the prefusion status and trimers in the postfusion status (43). The class III fusion proteins are trimers that, unlike class I fusion proteins, were not proteolytically processed N-terminally of the fusion peptide, resulting in a fusion-active membrane-anchored subunit (39, 62). Previous studies with LCMV described a tetrameric organization of the glycoprotein spikes (14), while more recent data using a bacterially expressed truncated ectodomain of the LCMV GP-2 subunit pointed toward a trimeric spike structure (31). Due to these conflicting data regarding the oligomerization status of LCMV GP, it remains unclear to which class of fusion proteins the arenaviral glycoproteins belong.The state of oligomerization and the correct conformation of viral glycoproteins are crucial for membrane fusion during virus entry. The early steps of infection have been shown for several viruses to be dependent on the cholesterol content of the participating membranes (i.e., either the virus envelope or the host cell membrane) (4, 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, 40, 42, 53, 56, 76, 78, 79). In fact, it has been shown previously that entry of both LASV and LCMV is susceptible to cholesterol depletion of the target host cell membrane using methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) treatment (64, 71). Moreover, cholesterol not only plays an important role in the early steps during entry in the viral life cycle but also is critical in the virus assembly and release process. Several viruses of various families, including influenza virus, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), measles virus, and Ebola virus, use the ordered environment of lipid raft microdomains. Due to their high levels of glycosphingolipids and cholesterol, these domains are characterized by insolubility in nonionic detergents under cold conditions (60, 72). Recent observations have suggested that budding of the New World arenavirus Junin virus occurs from detergent-soluble membrane areas (1). Assembly and release from distinct membrane microdomains that are detergent soluble have also been described for vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (12, 38, 68). At present, however, it is not known whether LASV requires cholesterol in its viral envelope for successful virus entry or whether specific membrane microdomains are important for LASV assembly and release.In this study, we first investigated the oligomeric state of the premature and mature LASV glycoprotein complexes. Since it has been shown for several membrane proteins that the oligomerization and conformation are dependent on cholesterol (58, 59, 76, 78), we further analyzed the dependence of the cholesterol content of the virus envelope on glycoprotein oligomerization and virus infectivity. Finally, we characterized the lipid membrane areas from which LASV is released.     

Differences in the Regulatory and Functional Effects of the Us3 Protein Kinase Activities of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2

Us3 protein kinases encoded by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2) are serine/threonine protein kinases and play critical roles in viral replication and pathogenicity in vivo. In the present study, we investigated differences in the biological properties of HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases and demonstrated that HSV-2 Us3 did not have some of the HSV-1 Us3 kinase functions, including control of nuclear egress of nucleocapsids, localization of UL31 and UL34, and cell surface expression of viral envelope glycoprotein B. In agreement with the observations that HSV-2 Us3 was less important for these functions, the effect of HSV-2 Us3 kinase activity on virulence in mice following intracerebral inoculation was much lower than that of HSV-1 Us3. Furthermore, we showed that alanine substitution in HSV-2 Us3 at a site (aspartic acid at position 147) corresponding to one that can be autophosphorylated in HSV-1 Us3 abolished HSV-2 Us3 kinase activity. Thus, the regulatory and functional effects of Us3 kinase activity are different between HSV-1 and HSV-2.Us3 protein kinases encoded by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2) are serine/threonine protein kinases with amino acid sequences that are conserved in the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae (6, 24, 36). Based on studies showing that recombinant Us3 mutants of HSV-1 and HSV-2 have significantly impaired viral replication and virulence in mice models, it has been concluded that both HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases play important roles in viral replication and pathogenicity in vivo (25, 33, 41). In contrast, HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases are not essential for growth in tissue culture cells (33, 36). Thus, recombinant Us3 mutants grow as well as wild-type viruses in Vero cells, and the mutants exhibit modestly impaired replication in HEp-2 cells (33, 36, 39, 40). The possible functions of Us3 have been extensively studied and gradually elucidated for HSV-1 Us3, but much less is known about HSV-2 Us3. These functions include (i) blocking apoptosis (1, 22, 30, 31, 35); (ii) promoting nuclear egress of progeny nucleocapsids through the nuclear membrane (39, 40, 45); (iii) redistributing and phosphorylating nuclear membrane-associated viral nuclear egress factors UL31 and UL34 (14, 37, 38) and cellular proteins, including lamin A/C and emerin (21, 27, 28); (iv) controlling infected cell morphology (13, 31, 32); and (v) downregulating cell surface expression of viral envelope glycoprotein B (gB) (12).To determine the molecular mechanisms for a viral protein kinase''s effects in infected cells, the kinase''s physiological substrates and its phosphorylation sites must be identified. This can involve studies showing that the altered phenotypes observed in cells infected with a mutant virus lacking the protein kinase activity is also detected in cells infected with a mutant virus in which the substrate''s phosphorylation sites have been modified by mutations. Although more than 15 potential HSV Us3 substrates have been reported, HSV-1 Us3 phosphorylation of only three substrates (Us3 itself, gB, and UL31) has been demonstrated to be linked directly with Us3 functions in infected cells (12, 13, 29, 41) as follows. (i) Us3 has been reported to autophosphorylate serine at position 147 (Ser-147), and this phosphorylation augments Us3''s kinase activity in infected cells (13, 41). Even though only a small fraction of Us3 is autophosphorylated at Ser-147 in infected cells, alanine replacement of Ser-147 in Us3 significantly reduced HSV-1 replication in the mouse cornea and pathogenic manifestations of herpes stroma keratitis and periocular skin disease in mice (41). These results indicated that Us3 kinase activity was, in part, regulated by autophosphorylation of Ser-147, and regulation of Us3 activity by autophosphorylation played a critical role in viral replication in vivo and HSV-1 pathogenesis. (ii) It has been reported that HSV-1 Us3 phosphorylates Thr-887 in the cytoplasmic tail of gB, and this phosphorylation downregulates the cell surface expression of gB (12). Us3 phosphorylation of gB at Thr-887 also has been proposed to be involved in the regulation of fusion of the nascent progeny virion envelope with the cell''s outer nuclear membrane, based on the observation that virions accumulated aberrantly in the perinuclear space in cells infected with mutant viruses carrying the amino acid substitution mutation T887A in gB and lacking the capacity to produce gH (45). The Us3 phosphorylation of gB at Thr-887 appeared to be critical for HSV-1 replication and pathogenesis in vivo, based on studies showing that the T887A substitution in the phosphorylation site in gB significantly reduced viral replication in the mouse cornea and pathogenic manifestations of herpes stroma keratitis and periocular skin disease in mice (Takahiko Imai, Ken Sagou, and Yasushi Kawaguchi, unpublished observations). (iii) It has been shown that Us3 phosphorylated some or all of the six serines in the UL31 N-terminal region, and this phosphorylation regulated the proper localization of UL31 and UL34 at the nuclear membrane and nuclear egress of nucleocapsids (29). Thus, the molecular basis of HSV-1 Us3 effects in infected cells have been gradually elucidated.However, the Us3 phosphorylation sites in Us3 itself and in gB are not conserved between HSV serotypes (12, 13). The amino acid residues in HSV-2 Us3 and gB corresponding to HSV-1 Us3 Ser-147 and gB Thr-887 are aspartic acid (Asp-147) and alanine (Ala-887), respectively. These results suggest that some HSV-1 Us3 functions, such as regulation of its own catalytic activity and control of gB expression on the cell surface, are not regulated by HSV-2 Us3 or are regulated in a manner(s) different from HSV-1 Us3. In agreement with this suggestion, there is a marked difference between HSV-1 and HSV-2 virulence in mice following intracerebral infection, with the HSV-1 Us3 null mutant being >10⁴-fold less virulent than the parent wild-type virus (25), while the HSV-2 Us3 null mutant was only ∼10-fold less virulent (33). Although these results were from different reports and the mouse strains used in the studies were different, they indicate that some HSV-1 Us3 functions are different from those of HSV-2 Us3.Therefore, we investigated differences in the biological properties of HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases. It was of particular interest to examine whether Asp-147 in HSV-2 Us3 is required for its own kinase activity, since it is well established that acidic amino acids such as Asp or glutamic acid sometimes mimic the negative charges produced by phosphorylation (29, 46). In the present study, using a genetic manipulation system of HSV-2 with our newly constructed HSV-2 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone, we have shown that HSV-2 Us3 exhibited marked differences from HSV-1 Us3 in its catalytic functions, including the regulation of UL31/UL34 localization, nuclear egress of nucleocapsids, cell surface expression of gB, and virulence in mice. We also found that Asp-147 in HSV-2 Us3 was critical for its kinase activity, raising a possibility that the activity of Us3 kinases was regulated differently in HSV-1 and HSV-2.     

Structural Evidence of Glycoprotein Assembly in Cellular Membrane Compartments prior to Alphavirus Budding

Membrane glycoproteins of alphavirus play a critical role in the assembly and budding of progeny virions. However, knowledge regarding transport of viral glycoproteins to the plasma membrane is obscure. In this study, we investigated the role of cytopathic vacuole type II (CPV-II) through in situ electron tomography of alphavirus-infected cells. The results revealed that CPV-II contains viral glycoproteins arranged in helical tubular arrays resembling the basic organization of glycoprotein trimers on the envelope of the mature virions. The location of CPV-II adjacent to the site of viral budding suggests a model for the transport of structural components to the site of budding. Thus, the structural characteristics of CPV-II can be used in evaluating the design of a packaging cell line for replicon production.Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is an enveloped alphavirus belonging to the family Togaviridae. This T=4 icosahedral virus particle is approximately 70 nm in diameter (30) and consists of 240 copies of E1/E2 glycoprotein dimers (3, 8, 24). The glycoproteins are anchored in a host-derived lipid envelope that encloses a nucleocapsid, made of a matching number of capsid proteins and a positive single-stranded RNA molecule. After entry of the virus via receptor-mediated endocytosis, a low-pH-induced fusion of the viral envelope with the endosomal membrane delivers the nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm, where the replication events of SFV occur (8, 19, 30). Replication of the viral genome and subsequent translation into structural and nonstructural proteins followed by assembly of the structural proteins and genome (7) lead to budding of progeny virions at the plasma membrane (18, 20). The synthesis of viral proteins shuts off host cell macromolecule synthesis, which allows for efficient intracellular replication of progeny virus (7). The expression of viral proteins leads to the formation of cytopathic vacuolar compartments as the result of the reorganization of cellular membrane in the cytoplasm of an infected cell (1, 7, 14).Early studies using electron microscopy (EM) have characterized the cytopathic vacuoles (CPVs) in SFV-infected cells (6, 13, 14) and identified two types of CPV, namely, CPV type I (CPV-I) and CPV-II. It was found that CPV-I is derived from modified endosomes and lysosomes (18), while CPV-II is derived from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) (10, 11). Significantly, the TGN and CPV-II vesicles are the major membrane compartments marked with E1/E2 glycoproteins (9, 11, 12). Inhibition by monensin results in the accumulation of E1/E2 glycoproteins in the TGN (12, 26), thereby indicating the origin of CPV-II. While CPV-II is identified as the predominant vacuolar structure at the late stage of SFV infection, the exact function of this particular cytopathic vacuole is less well characterized than that of CPV-I (2, 18), although previous observations have pointed to the involvement of CPV-II in budding, because an associated loss of viral budding was observed when CPV-II was absent (9, 36).In this study, we characterized the structure and composition of CPV-II in SFV-infected cells in situ with the aid of electron tomography and immuno-electron microscopy after physical fixation of SFV-infected cells by high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution (21, 22, 33). The results revealed a helical array of E1/E2 glycoproteins within CPV-II and indicate that CPV-II plays an important role in intracellular transport of glycoproteins prior to SFV budding.     

The Amino Terminus of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein K (gK) Modulates gB-Mediated Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Virion Egress

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-induced cell fusion is mediated by viral glycoproteins and other membrane proteins expressed on infected cell surfaces. Certain mutations in the carboxyl terminus of HSV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) and in the amino terminus of gK cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion. Although gB is known to be a fusogenic glycoprotein, the mechanism by which gK is involved in virus-induced cell fusion remains elusive. To delineate the amino-terminal domains of gK involved in virus-induced cell fusion, the recombinant viruses gKΔ31-47, gKΔ31-68, and gKΔ31-117, expressing gK carrying in-frame deletions spanning the amino terminus of gK immediately after the gK signal sequence (amino acids [aa] 1 to 30), were constructed. Mutant viruses gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 exhibited a gK-null (ΔgK) phenotype characterized by the formation of very small viral plaques and up to a 2-log reduction in the production of infectious virus in comparison to that for the parental HSV-1(F) wild-type virus. The gKΔ31-68 mutant virus formed substantially larger plaques and produced 1-log-higher titers than the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 mutant virions at low multiplicities of infection. Deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB (gBΔ28syn) caused extensive virus-induced cell fusion. However, the gBΔ28syn mutation was unable to cause virus-induced cell fusion in the presence of the gKΔ31-68 mutation. Transient expression of a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 aa of gK (gKa) produced a glycosylated peptide that was efficiently expressed on cell surfaces only after infection with the HSV-1(F), gKΔ31-68, ΔgK, or UL20-null virus. The gKa peptide complemented the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-68 mutant viruses for infectious-virus production and for gKΔ31-68/gBΔ28syn-mediated cell fusion. These data show that the amino terminus of gK modulates gB-mediated virus-induced cell fusion and virion egress.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) specifies at least 11 virally encoded glycoproteins, as well as several nonglycosylated and lipid-anchored membrane-associated proteins, which serve important functions in virion infectivity and virus spread. Although cell-free enveloped virions can efficiently spread viral infection, virions can also spread by causing cell fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Virus-induced cell fusion, which is caused by viral glycoproteins expressed on infected cell surfaces, enables transmission of virions from one cell to another, avoiding extracellular spaces and exposure of free virions to neutralizing antibodies (reviewed in reference 56). Most mutations that cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial or syn mutations) have been mapped to at least four regions of the viral genome: the UL20 gene (5, 42, 44); the UL24 gene (37, 58); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein B (gB) (9, 51); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57).Increasing evidence suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action of glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL. Recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2). Binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including Nectin-1, HVEM, and others (12, 29, 48, 59, 60, 62, 63), is thought to trigger conformation changes in gH/gL and gB that cause fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry and virus-induced cell fusion (32, 34). Transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (49, 68). However, this phenomenon does not accurately model viral fusion, because other viral glycoproteins and membrane proteins known to be important for virus-induced cell fusion are not required (6, 14, 31). Specifically, gK and UL20 were shown to be absolutely required for virus-induced cell fusion (21, 46). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57) or UL20 (5, 42, 44) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than wild-type virus into susceptible cells (25). Furthermore, transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while coexpression of the wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL inhibited cell fusion (3).Glycoproteins gB and gH are highly conserved across all subfamilies of herpesviruses. gB forms a homotrimeric type I integral membrane protein, which is N glycosylated at multiple sites within the polypeptide. An unusual feature of gB is that syncytial mutations that enhance virus-induced cell fusion are located exclusively in the carboxyl terminus of gB, which is predicted to be located intracellularly (51). Single-amino-acid substitutions within two regions of the intracellular cytoplasmic domain of gB were shown to cause syncytium formation and were designated region I (amino acid [aa] positions 816 and 817) and region II (aa positions 853, 854, and 857) (9, 10, 28, 69). Furthermore, deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB, disrupting the small predicted alpha-helical domain H17b, causes extensive virus-induced cell fusion as well as extensive glycoprotein-mediated cell fusion in the gB, gD, and gH/gL transient-coexpression system (22, 49, 68). The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of gB has been determined and is predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB. Therefore, perturbation of the carboxyl terminus of gB may alter the conformation of the amino terminus of gB, thus favoring one of the two predicted conformational structures that causes membrane fusion (34).The UL53 (gK) and UL20 genes encode multipass transmembrane proteins of 338 and 222 aa, respectively, which are conserved in all alphaherpesviruses (15, 42, 55). Both proteins have multiple sites where posttranslational modification can occur; however, only gK is posttranslationally modified by N-linked carbohydrate addition (15, 35, 55). The specific membrane topologies of both gK and UL20 protein (UL20p) have been predicted and experimentally confirmed using epitope tags inserted within predicted intracellular and extracellular domains (18, 21, 44). Syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (18), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p, shown to be located intracellularly (44). A series of recent studies have shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20 functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport and cell surface expression (16, 18, 21, 26, 45). Specifically, direct protein-protein interactions between the amino terminus of HSV-1 UL20 and gK domain III, both of which are localized intracellularly, were recently demonstrated by two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments (19).According to the most prevalent model for herpesvirus intracellular morphogenesis, capsids initially assemble within the nuclei and acquire a primary envelope by budding into the perinuclear spaces. Subsequently, these virions lose their envelope through fusion with the outer nuclear lamellae. Within the cytoplasm, tegument proteins associate with the viral nucleocapsid and final envelopment occurs by budding of cytoplasmic capsids into specific trans-Golgi network (TGN)-associated membranes (8, 30, 47, 70). Mature virions traffic to cell surfaces, presumably following the cellular secretory pathway (33, 47, 61). In addition to their significant roles in virus-induced cell fusion, gK and UL20 are required for cytoplasmic virion envelopment. Viruses with deletions in either the gK or the UL20 gene are unable to translocate from the cytoplasm to extracellular spaces and accumulated as unenveloped virions in the cytoplasm (5, 15, 20, 21, 26, 35, 36, 38, 44, 55). Current evidence suggests that the functions of gK and UL20 in cytoplasmic virion envelopment and virus-induced cell fusion are carried out by different, genetically separable domains of UL20p. Specifically, UL20 mutations within the amino and carboxyl termini of UL20p allowed cotransport of gK and UL20p to cell surfaces, virus-induced cell fusion, and TGN localization, while effectively inhibiting cytoplasmic virion envelopment (44, 45).In this paper, we demonstrate that the amino terminus of gK expressed as a free peptide of 82 aa (gKa) is transported to infected cell surfaces by viral proteins other than gK or UL20p and facilitates virus-induced cell fusion caused by syncytial mutations in the carboxyl terminus of gB. Thus, functional domains of gK can be genetically separated, as we have shown previously (44, 45), as well as physically separated into different peptide portions that retain functional activities of gK. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amino terminus of gK directly or indirectly interacts with and modulates the fusogenic properties of gB.     

Low pH-Induced Conformational Change in Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein B

Herpesviruses can enter host cells using pH-dependent endocytosis pathways in a cell-specific manner. Envelope glycoprotein B (gB) is conserved among all herpesviruses and is a critical component of the complex that mediates membrane fusion and entry. Here we demonstrate that mildly acidic pH triggers specific conformational changes in herpes simplex virus (HSV) gB. The antigenic structure of gB was specifically altered by exposure to low pH both in vitro and during entry into host cells. The oligomeric conformation of gB was altered at a similar pH range. Exposure to acid pH appeared to convert virion gB into a lower-order oligomer. The detected conformational changes were reversible, similar to those in other class III fusion proteins. Exposure of purified, recombinant gB to mildly acidic pH resulted in similar changes in conformation and caused gB to become more hydrophobic, suggesting that low pH directly affects gB. We propose that intracellular low pH induces alterations in gB conformation that, together with additional triggers such as receptor binding, are essential for virion-cell fusion during herpesviral entry by endocytosis.Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is an important human pathogen, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. HSV enters host cells by fusion of the viral envelope with either an endosomal membrane (38) or the plasma membrane (63). The entry pathway taken is thought to be determined by both virus (17, 45) and host cell (4, 17, 35, 39, 45) factors. Based on experiments with lysosomotropic agents, which elevate the normally low pH of endosomes, acidic pH has been implicated in the endocytic entry of HSV into several cell types, including human epithelial cells (37). Low pH has also recently been implicated in cell infection by several other human and veterinary herpesviruses (1, 21, 26, 47). The mechanistic role of endosomal pH in herpesvirus entry into cells is not known.Herpesviruses are a paradigm for membrane fusion mediated by a complex of several glycoproteins. We have proposed that HSV likely encodes machinery to mediate both pH-dependent and pH-independent membrane fusion reactions. Envelope glycoproteins glycoprotein B (gB) and gD and the heterodimer gH-gL are required for both pH-independent and pH-dependent entry pathways (11, 22, 30, 39, 46). Interaction of gD with one of its cognate receptors is an essential trigger for membrane fusion and entry (13, 52), regardless of the cellular pathway. However, engagement of a gD receptor is not sufficient for fusion, and at least one additional unknown trigger involving gB or gH-gL is likely necessary. gB is conserved among all herpesviruses, and in all cases studied to date, it plays roles in viral entry, including receptor binding and membrane fusion. The crystal structure of an ectodomain fragment of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) gB is an elongated, rod-like structure containing hydrophobic internal fusion loops (28). This structure bears striking architectural homology to the low pH, postfusion form of G glycoprotein from vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G) (43). Both the gB and G structures have features of class I and class II fusion proteins and are thus designated class III proteins (57).During entry of the majority of virus families, low pH acts directly on glycoproteins to induce membrane fusion (60). In some cases, the low pH trigger is not sufficient, or it plays an indirect role. For example, host cell proteases, such as cathepsins D and L, require intravesicular low pH to cleave Ebola virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) glycoproteins to trigger fusion (14, 51).We investigated the role of low pH in the molecular mechanism of herpesviral entry. The results suggest that mildly acidic pH, similar to that found within endosomes, triggers a conformational change in gB. We propose that, together with other cellular cues such as receptor interaction, intracellular low pH can play a direct activating role in HSV membrane fusion and entry.     

Virion Incorporation of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Tegument Protein VP22 Occurs via Glycoprotein E-Specific Recruitment to the Late Secretory Pathway

The mechanism by which herpesviruses acquire their tegument is not yet clear. One model is that outer tegument proteins are recruited by the cytoplasmic tails of viral glycoproteins. In the case of herpes simplex virus tegument protein VP22, interactions with the glycoproteins gE and gD have been shown. We have previously shown that the C-terminal half of VP22 contains the necessary signal for assembly into the virus. Here, we show that during infection VP22 interacts with gE and gM, as well as its tegument partner VP16. However, by using a range of techniques we were unable to demonstrate VP22 binding to gD. By using pulldown assays, we show that while the cytoplasmic tails of both gE and gM interact with VP22, only gE interacts efficiently with the C-terminal packaging domain of VP22. Furthermore, gE but not gM can recruit VP22 to the Golgi/trans-Golgi network region of the cell in the absence of other virus proteins. To examine the role of the gE-VP22 interaction in infection, we constructed a recombinant virus expressing a mutant VP22 protein with a 14-residue deletion that is unable to bind gE (ΔgEbind). Coimmunoprecipitation assays confirmed that this variant of VP22 was unable to complex with gE. Moreover, VP22 was no longer recruited to its characteristic cytoplasmic trafficking complexes but exhibited a diffuse localization. Importantly, packaging of this variant into virions was abrogated. The mutant virus exhibited poor growth in epithelial cells, similar to the defect we have observed for a VP22 knockout virus. These results suggest that deletion of just 14 residues from the VP22 protein is sufficient to inhibit binding to gE and hence recruitment to the viral envelope and assembly into the virus, resulting in a growth phenotype equivalent to that produced by deleting the entire reading frame.The herpesvirus tegument is the virion compartment located between the DNA-containing capsid and the virus envelope (6). Although it is well defined that the viral capsid assembles in the nucleus (37, 38) and the viral envelope is acquired from cellular membranes (3, 24), the mechanism of tegument protein acquisition is still to be established. At least 20 virus-encoded components are recruited into the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) tegument (32), and there is increasing evidence to suggest that subsets of these proteins may be added as assembly progresses along the maturation pathway (28). To ensure efficient incorporation, it is likely that individual tegument proteins are specifically targeted to their cellular site of recruitment. Such targeting could involve interaction with a viral partner, a cellular partner, or both. A clearer understanding of how individual tegument proteins are acquired by newly assembling virions will help to define the herpesvirus assembly pathway.A number of protein-protein interactions between individual tegument proteins (13, 40, 42), and between tegument proteins and glycoproteins (19, 20, 22, 32), have been described that may provide useful insight into the assembly process. In particular, the interaction of tegument proteins with the cytoplasmic tails of virus glycoproteins provides an attractive mechanism for the virion recruitment of at least the outer components of the tegument. In the case of VP22, the homologues from pseudorabies virus (PRV) and HSV-1 have been shown to interact with the cytoplasmic tail of gE (19, 20, 32). However, the role of this interaction in virus infection has not yet been clearly defined and the fact that additional glycoprotein interactions have been described, with gM in the case of PRV and gD in the case of HSV-1, may point to potential redundancy in the mechanism of VP22 packaging (4, 19, 20). In addition, we and others have previously shown that HSV-1 VP22 interacts directly with a second tegument protein, namely, VP16 (13, 33), an interaction that could provide an alternative route for VP22 to enter the virion. In a previous study, we concluded that the region of VP22 containing its VP16 interaction domain was required but not sufficient for optimal VP22 packaging into the assembling virion, with an additional C-terminal determinant also involved (23). We also demonstrated that the same region of VP22 that was required for virion packaging was essential to target the protein to its characteristic cytoplasmic trafficking complexes, suggesting that these specific sites may be the location in the cell for VP22 assembly into the virion (23). Since that study, O''Regan and coworkers have reported that the C-terminal half of HSV-1 VP22 also contains the binding site for gE (32), providing a possible candidate for an additional VP22 binding partner. Furthermore, as HSV-1 VP22 has been shown to bind to gD and PRV VP22 interacts with gM, it is possible that the C terminus of VP22 contains a gD and/or a gM binding site (4, 20).In the present study, we aimed to clarify the molecular mechanism by which VP22 is recruited into the virus particle. We show that HSV-1 VP22 binds efficiently to VP16, gE, and gM in the infected cell, but we cannot detect an interaction with gD. We show that the packaging domain of VP22 binds to the cytoplasmic tail of gE but not gM and that the same region of VP22 is recruited to the secretory pathway by gE in the absence of other virus proteins. Finally, we show that a mutant VP22 protein lacking a 14-residue peptide from its packaging domain is unable to interact with gE during infection, exhibits a different subcellular localization, and fails to assemble into the virus particle. This is the first characterization of a single protein-protein interaction essential for the packaging of an HSV-1 tegument protein.     

Ebola Virus Glycoprotein Counteracts BST-2/Tetherin Restriction in a Sequence-Independent Manner That Does Not Require Tetherin Surface Removal

BST-2/tetherin is an interferon-inducible protein that restricts the release of enveloped viruses from the surface of infected cells by physically linking viral and cellular membranes. It is present at both the cell surface and in a perinuclear region, and viral anti-tetherin factors including HIV-1 Vpu and HIV-2 Env have been shown to decrease the cell surface population. To map the domains of human tetherin necessary for both virus restriction and sensitivity to viral anti-tetherin factors, we constructed a series of tetherin derivatives and assayed their activity. We found that the cytoplasmic tail (CT) and transmembrane (TM) domains of tetherin alone produced its characteristic cellular distribution, while the ectodomain of the protein, which includes a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor, was sufficient to restrict virus release when presented by the CT/TM regions of a different type II membrane protein. To counteract tetherin restriction and remove it from the cell surface, HIV-1 Vpu required the specific sequence present in the TM domain of human tetherin. In contrast, the HIV-2 Env required only the ectodomain of the protein and was sensitive to a point mutation in this region. Strikingly, the anti-tetherin factor, Ebola virus GP, was able to overcome restriction conferred by both tetherin and a series of functional tetherin derivatives, including a wholly artificial tetherin molecule. Moreover, GP overcame restriction without significantly removing tetherin from the cell surface. These findings suggest that Ebola virus GP uses a novel mechanism to circumvent tetherin restriction.Pathogenic viruses often have evolved mechanisms to neutralize host defenses that act at the cellular level to interfere with the virus life cycle. Such cellular restriction factors have been most extensively characterized for HIV-1 (38) and include the interferon-inducible membrane protein BST-2/HM1.24/CD317/tetherin (28, 40). If unchecked, tetherin blocks the release of newly formed HIV-1 particles from cells by physically tethering them at the cell surface (7, 28, 32, 40). In addition, tetherin has been shown to act against a broad range of enveloped viral particles, including retroviruses, filoviruses, arenaviruses, and herpesviruses (17, 18, 23, 35). In turn, certain viruses that are targeted by tetherin appear to have evolved counteracting activities, and anti-tetherin factors so far identified include HIV-1 Vpu; HIV-2 Env; simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Nef, Vpu, and Env proteins; Ebola virus GP; and Kaposi''s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) K5 (11, 16, 18, 20, 23, 28, 36, 40, 44, 45).Tetherin is a homodimeric type II integral membrane protein containing an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail (CT), a single-pass transmembrane domain (TM), an ectodomain-containing predicted coiled-coil regions, two glycoslyation sites, three conserved cysteines, and a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor (2, 19, 31). This unusual topology, with two independent membrane anchors, has led to the suggestion that the retention of virions at the cell surface arises from tetherin''s ability to be inserted simultaneously in both host and viral membranes (28, 32, 41) or, alternatively, that dimers or higher-order complexes of tetherin conferred by the ectodomain mediate this effect (39). Interestingly, an artificial tetherin containing the same structural features as the native protein but constructed from unrelated sequences was able to restrict both HIV-1 and Ebola virus particles (32). This suggests that the viral lipid envelope is the target of tetherin and provides an explanation for tetherin''s broad activity against diverse enveloped viruses.A fraction of tetherin is present at the plasma membrane of cells (9, 14), and it has been proposed that viral anti-tetherin factors function by removing this cell surface fraction (40). This now has been shown to occur in the presence of HIV-1 Vpu (5, 7, 15, 26, 34, 40, 44), HIV-2 Env (5, 20), SIV Env (11), SIV Nef (15), and KSHV K5 (3, 23). In addition, certain anti-tetherin factors also may promote the degradation of tetherin, as has been observed for both HIV-1 Vpu (3, 5, 7, 10, 22, 26, 27) and KSHV K5 (3, 23), although Vpu also appears able to block tetherin restriction in the absence of degradation (8), and no effects on tetherin steady-state levels have been observed in the presence of either the HIV-2 or SIVtan Env (11, 20). Simply keeping tetherin away from the cell surface, or targeting it for degradation, may not be the only mechanism used by anti-tetherin factors, since it also has been reported that Vpu does not affect the levels of surface tetherin or its total cellular levels in certain T-cell lines (27).The interactions between tetherin and viral anti-tetherin factors show evidence of species specificity, suggesting ongoing evolution between viruses and their hosts. HIV-1 Vpu is active against human and chimpanzee tetherin but not other primate tetherins (10, 25, 34, 36, 44, 45), while SIV Nef proteins are active against primate but not human tetherins (16, 36, 44, 45). This suggests that, unlike tetherin restriction, the action of the anti-tetherin factors may involve specific sequence interactions. Indeed, the TM domain has been recognized as a target for HIV-1 Vpu (10, 15, 16, 25, 34), while a single point mutation introduced into the extracellular domain of human tetherin can block its antagonism by the SIVtan Env (11).In the present study, we investigated the roles of the different domains of tetherin in both promoting virus restriction and conferring susceptibility to the anti-tetherin factors encoded by HIV-1, HIV-2, and Ebola virus. We confirmed that tetherin restriction can be conferred by proteins that retain the two distinct membrane anchors, while signals for the cellular localization of the protein reside in the CT/TM domains of the protein. We found that the Vpu protein targets the TM domain of tetherin, while the HIV-2 Env targets the ectodomain of the protein. In contrast, the Ebola virus GP appears to use a non-sequence-specific mechanism to counteract tetherin restriction, since even an artificial tetherin could be successfully overcome by GP expression. Interestingly, Ebola virus GP counteracted tetherin restriction without removing the protein from the cell surface, suggesting that it is possible to overcome this restriction by mechanisms other than blocking tetherin''s cell surface expression.     

Mutations within a Conserved Region of the Hepatitis C Virus E2 Glycoprotein That Influence Virus-Receptor Interactions and Sensitivity to Neutralizing Antibodies

Cell culture-adaptive mutations within the hepatitis C virus (HCV) E2 glycoprotein have been widely reported. We identify here a single mutation (N415D) in E2 that arose during long-term passaging of HCV strain JFH1-infected cells. This mutation was located within E2 residues 412 to 423, a highly conserved region that is recognized by several broadly neutralizing antibodies, including the mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) AP33. Introduction of N415D into the wild-type (WT) JFH1 genome increased the affinity of E2 to the CD81 receptor and made the virus less sensitive to neutralization by an antiserum to another essential entry factor, SR-BI. Unlike JFH1_WT, the JFH1_N415D was not neutralized by AP33. In contrast, it was highly sensitive to neutralization by patient-derived antibodies, suggesting an increased availability of other neutralizing epitopes on the virus particle. We included in this analysis viruses carrying four other single mutations located within this conserved E2 region: T416A, N417S, and I422L were cell culture-adaptive mutations reported previously, while G418D was generated here by growing JFH1_WT under MAb AP33 selective pressure. MAb AP33 neutralized JFH1_T416A and JFH1_I422L more efficiently than the WT virus, while neutralization of JFH1_N417S and JFH1_G418D was abrogated. The properties of all of these viruses in terms of receptor reactivity and neutralization by human antibodies were similar to JFH1_N415D, highlighting the importance of the E2 412-423 region in virus entry.Hepatitis C virus (HCV), which belongs to the Flaviviridae family, has a positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome encoding a polyprotein that is cleaved by cellular and viral proteases to yield mature structural and nonstructural proteins. The structural proteins consist of core, E1 and E2, while the nonstructural proteins are p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B (42). The hepatitis C virion comprises the RNA genome surrounded by the structural proteins core (nucleocapsid) and E1 and E2 (envelope glycoproteins). The HCV glycoproteins lie within a lipid envelope surrounding the nucleocapsid and play a major role in HCV entry into host cells (21). The development of retrovirus-based HCV pseudoparticles (HCVpp) (3) and the cell culture infectious clone JFH1 (HCVcc) (61) has provided powerful tools to study HCV entry.HCV entry is initiated by the binding of virus particles to attachment factors which are believed to be glycosaminoglycans (2), low-density lipoprotein receptor (41), and C-type lectins such as DC-SIGN and L-SIGN (12, 37, 38). Upon attachment at least four entry factors are important for particle internalization. These include CD81 (50), SR-BI (53) and the tight junction proteins claudin-1 (15) and occludin (6, 36, 51).CD81, a member of the tetraspanin family, is a cell surface protein with various functions including tissue differentiation, cell-cell adhesion and immune cell maturation (34). It consists of a small and a large extracellular loop (LEL) with four transmembrane domains. Viral entry is dependent on HCV E2 binding to the LEL of CD81 (3, 50). The importance of HCV glycoprotein interaction with CD81 is underlined by the fact that many neutralizing antibodies compete with CD81 and act in a CD81-blocking manner (1, 5, 20, 45).SR-BI is a multiligand receptor expressed on liver cells and on steroidogenic tissue. It binds to high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL) (31). The SR-BI binding site is mapped to the hypervariable region 1 (HVR-1) of HCV E2 (53). SR-BI ligands, such as HDL and oxidized LDL have been found to affect HCV infectivity (4, 14, 58-60). Indeed, HDL has been shown to enhance HCV infection in an SR-BI-dependent manner (4, 14, 58, 59). Antibodies against SR-BI and knockdown of SR-BI in cells result in a significant inhibition of viral infection in both the HCVpp and the HCVcc systems (5, 25, 32).Although clearly involved in entry and immune recognition, the more downstream function(s) of HCV glycoproteins are poorly understood, as their structure has not yet been solved. Nonetheless, mutational analysis and mapping of neutralizing antibody epitopes have delineated several discontinuous regions of E2 that are essential for HCV particle binding and entry (24, 33, 45, 47). One of these is a highly conserved sequence spanning E2 residues 412 to 423 (QLINTNGSWHIN). Several broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) bind to this epitope. These include mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb) AP33, rat MAb 3/11, and the human MAbs e137, HCV1, and 95-2 (8, 16, 44, 45, 49). Of these, MAbs AP33, 3/11, and e137 are known to block the binding of E2 to CD81.Cell culture-adaptive mutations within the HCV glycoproteins are valuable for investigating the virus interaction(s) with cellular receptors (18). In the present study, we characterize an asparagine-to-aspartic acid mutation at residue 415 (N415D) in HCV strain JFH1 E2 that arose during the long-term passaging of infected human hepatoma Huh-7 cells. Alongside N415D, we also characterize three adjacent cell culture adaptive mutations reported previously and a novel substitution generated in the present study by propagating virus under MAb AP33 selective pressure to gain further insight into the function of this region of E2 in viral infection.     

Virological Synapse-Mediated Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 between T Cells Is Sensitive to Entry Inhibition

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate between CD4⁺ T cells via diffusion-limited cell-free viral spread or by directed cell-cell transfer using virally induced structures termed virological synapses. Although T-cell virological synapses have been well characterized, it is unclear whether this mode of viral spread is susceptible to inhibition by neutralizing antibodies and entry inhibitors. We show here that both cell-cell and cell-free viral spread are equivalently sensitive to entry inhibition. Fluorescence imaging analysis measuring virological synapse lifetimes and inhibitor time-of-addition studies implied that inhibitors can access preformed virological synapses and interfere with HIV-1 cell-cell infection. This concept was supported by electron tomography that revealed the T-cell virological synapse to be a relatively permeable structure. Virological synapse-mediated HIV-1 spread is thus efficient but is not an immune or entry inhibitor evasion mechanism, a result that is encouraging for vaccine and drug design.As with enveloped viruses from several viral families, the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate both by fluid-phase diffusion of viral particles and by directed cell-cell transfer (39). The primary target cell for HIV-1 replication in vivo is the CD4⁺ T-cell (13), which is infectible by CCR5-tropic (R5) and CXCR4-tropic (X4) viral variants (29). R5 HIV-1 is the major transmitted viral phenotype and dominates the global pandemic, whereas X4 virus is found later in infection in ca. 50% of infected individuals, and its presence indicates a poor disease progression prognosis (23). Cell-cell HIV-1 transfer between T cells is more efficient than diffusion-limited spread (8, 16, 32, 38), although recent estimates for the differential range from approximately 1 (42) to 4 (6) orders of magnitude. Two structures have been proposed to support contact-mediated intercellular movement of HIV-1 between T cells: membrane nanotubes (33, 43) and macromolecular adhesive contacts termed virological synapses (VS) (15, 17, 33). VS appear to be the dominant structure involved in T-cell-T-cell spread (33), and both X4 (17) and R5 HIV-1 (6, 15, 42) can spread between T cells via this mechanism.VS assembly and function are dependent on HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) engaging its primary cellular receptor CD4 (2, 6, 17). This interaction recruits more CD4 and coreceptor to the site of cell-cell contact in an actin-dependent manner (17). Adhesion molecules cluster at the intercellular junction and are thought to stabilize the VS (18). In parallel, viral Env and Gag are recruited to the interface by a microtubule-dependent mechanism (19), where polarized viral budding may release virions into the synaptic space across which the target cell is infected (17). The precise mechanism by which HIV-1 subsequently enters the target T-cell cytoplasm remains unclear: by fusion directly at the plasma membrane, fusion from within an endosomal compartment, or both (4, 6, 15, 25, 34).Viruses from diverse families including herpesviruses (9), poxviruses (22) and hepatitis C virus (44) evade neutralizing antibody attack by direct cell-cell spread, since the tight junctions across which the these viruses move are antibody impermeable. It has been speculated that transfer of HIV-1 across VS may promote evasion from immune or therapeutic intervention with the inference that the junctions formed in retroviral VS may be nonpermissive to antibody entry (39). However, available evidence regarding whether neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and other entry inhibitors can inhibit HIV-1 cell-cell spread is inconsistent (25). An early analysis suggested that HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread is relatively resistant to neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NMAb) (12). A later study agreed with this conclusion by demonstrating a lack of permissivity of HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread, measured by transfer of viral Gag, to interference with viral fusion using a gp41-specific NMAb and a peptidic fusion inhibitor (6). In contrast, another analysis reported that anti-gp41-specific NMAb interfered effectively with HIV-1 spread between T cells (26). Inhibitors of the HIV-1 surface glycoprotein (gp120)-CD4 or gp120-CXCR4 interaction reduced X4 HIV-1 VS assembly and viral transfer if applied prior to mixing of infected and receptor-expressing target cells (17, 19), but the effect of these inhibitors has not been tested on preformed VS. Thus, the field is currently unclear on whether direct T-cell-T-cell infectious HIV-1 spread is susceptible or not to antibody and entry inhibitor-mediated disruption of VS assembly, and the related question, whether the VS is permeable to viral entry inhibitors, including NAb. Addressing these questions is of central importance to understanding HIV-1 pathogenesis and informing future drug and vaccine design.Since estimates reported in the literature of the relative efficiency of direct HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread compared to cell-free spread vary by approximately 3 orders of magnitude (6, 38, 42), and the evidence for the activity of viral entry inhibitors on cell-cell spread is conflicting, we set out to quantify the efficiency of infection across the T-cell VS and analyze the susceptibility of this structure to NAb and viral entry inhibitors. Assays reporting on events proximal to productive infection show that the R5 HIV-1 T-cell VS is approximately 1 order of magnitude more efficient than cell-free virus infection, and imaging analyses reveal that the VS assembled by HIV-1 is most likely permeable to inhibitors both during, and subsequent to, VS assembly. Thus, we conclude that the T-cell VS does not provide a privileged environment allowing HIV-1 escape from entry inhibition.     

Antagonism to and Intracellular Sequestration of Human Tetherin by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Envelope Glycoprotein

Tetherin (CD317/BST-2), an interferon-induced membrane protein, restricts the release of nascent retroviral particles from infected cell surfaces. While human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes the accessory gene vpu to overcome the action of tetherin, the lineage of primate lentiviruses that gave rise to HIV-2 does not. It has been previously reported that the HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein has a Vpu-like function in promoting virus release. Here we demonstrate that the HIV-2 Rod envelope glycoprotein (HIV-2 Rod Env) is a tetherin antagonist. Expression of HIV-2 Rod Env, but not that of HIV-1 or the closely related simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVmac1A11, counteracts tetherin-mediated restriction of Vpu-defective HIV-1 in a cell-type-specific manner. This correlates with the ability of the HIV-2 Rod Env to mediate cell surface downregulation of tetherin. Antagonism requires an endocytic motif conserved across HIV/SIV lineages in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail, but specificity for tetherin is governed by extracellular determinants in the mature Env protein. Coimmunoprecipitation studies suggest an interaction between HIV-2 Rod Env and tetherin, but unlike studies with Vpu, we found no evidence of tetherin degradation. In the presence of HIV-2 Rod Env, tetherin localization is restricted to the trans-Golgi network, suggesting Env-mediated effects on tetherin trafficking sequester it from virus assembly sites on the plasma membrane. Finally, we recapitulated these observations in HIV-2-infected CD4⁺ T-cell lines, demonstrating that tetherin antagonism and sequestration occur at physiological levels of Env expression during virus replication.Various stages of the replication cycle of primate lentiviruses can be targeted by host antiviral restriction factors (reviewed in reference 49). In addition to the well-characterized antiviral effects of members of the APOBEC3 family of cytidine deaminases, particularly APOBEC3G and -3F, and species-specific variants of tripartite motif family 5α, the release of nascent retroviral particles has recently been shown to be a target for a novel restriction factor, tetherin (CD317/bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 [BST-2]) (31, 46). Tetherin is an interferon-inducible gene that was originally shown to impart a restriction on the release of mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that lack a vpu gene (31, 46). In tetherin-positive cells, mature Vpu-defective HIV-1 particles are retained on the cell surface, linked to the plasma membrane (PM) and each other via protease-sensitive tethers, and can be subsequently endocytosed and accumulate in late endosomes (30, 31). Tetherin is not HIV specific and restricts the release of virus-like particles derived from all retroviruses tested (18), as well as those of filoviruses and arenaviruses (18, 19, 39).Tetherin is a small (181-amino-acid) type II membrane protein with an unusual topology that exists mainly as a disulfide-linked dimer (34). It consists of an N-terminal cytoplasmic tail, a transmembrane anchor, an extracellular domain that includes three cysteine residues important for dimerization, a putative coiled-coil, and finally a glycophosphatidyinosityl-linked lipid anchor (22) that is essential for restriction (31). Tetherin localizes to retroviral assembly sites on the PM (18, 31), and this unusual structure is highly suggestive that tetherin restricts virion release by incorporation into the viral membrane and cross-linking virions to cells. Such a mechanism would make tetherin a powerful antiviral effector that can target an obligate part of most, if not all, enveloped virus assembly strategies. Moreover, since tetherin restriction has no specific requirement for virus protein sequences, to avoid its action, mammalian viruses have evolved to encode several distinct countermeasures that specifically inhibit tetherin''s antiviral function.The Vpu accessory protein antagonizes tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 (31, 46). In the presence of Vpu, tetherin is downregulated from the cell surface (2, 46) and is targeted for degradation (10, 13, 14), although whether these processes are required for antagonism of tetherin function is unclear (27). HIV-1 Vpu displays a distinct species specificity in that it is unable to target tetherin orthologues from rhesus macaques or African green monkeys (14, 25). This differential sensitivity maps to the tetherin transmembrane domain, particularly residues that are predicted to have been under high positive selection pressure during primate evolution (14, 16, 25). This suggests that tetherin evolution may have been driven in part by viral countermeasures like Vpu. Vpu, however, is only encoded by HIV-1 and its direct simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) lineage precursors. The majority of SIVs, including the SIVsm, the progenitor of both HIV-2 and SIVmac, do not encode a Vpu protein (21). In some of these SIVs, tetherin antagonism was recently shown to map to the nef gene (16, 51). SIV Nef proteins, however, are generally ineffective against human tetherin because they target a (G/D)DIWK motif that was deleted from the human tetherin cytoplasmic tail sometime after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees (51). This raises the question of how HIV-2 is able to overcome human tetherin, as recent data show chronically HIV-2-infected CEM T cells have reduced tetherin levels on their surface (10).Interestingly, it has long been known that the envelope glycoprotein of certain HIV-2 isolates can stimulate the release of Vpu-defective HIV-1 virions from cells we now know to be tetherin positive (5, 6, 43). HIV and SIV Envs form trimeric spikes of dimers of the surface subunit (SU-gp105 in HIV-2/SIVmac and gp120 in HIV-1) that bind CD4 and the chemokine coreceptor and gp41 (the transmembrane [TM] subunit that facilitates fusion with and entry into the target cell). Envelope precursors (gp140 or gp160) are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, where they become glycosylated and are exported to the surface via the secretory pathway (8). During transit through the Golgi apparatus and possibly in endosomal compartments, the immature precursors are cleaved by furin-like proteases to form mature spikes (15, 29). Multiple endocytosis motifs in the gp41 cytoplasmic tail lead to only minor quantities of Env being exposed at the cell surface at any given time (7, 40). Recent data demonstrated that the conserved GYxxθ motif, a binding site for the clathrin adaptor protein AP-2 (3), in the membrane-proximal region of HIV-2 gp41 is required to promote Vpu-defective HIV-1 release from HeLa cells (1, 32). Based on experiments with HIV-1/HIV-2 chimeric envelopes, an additional requirement in the extracellular component was suggested (1). In this study we set out to examine the Vpu-like activity of HIV-2 envelope in light of the discovery of tetherin. We demonstrate that the HIV-2 Env is a tetherin antagonist, and we provide mechanistic insight into the basis of this antagonism.     

A Single Asparagine-Linked Glycosylation Site of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Glycoprotein Facilitates Inhibition by Mannose-Binding Lectin through Multiple Mechanisms

Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) is a serum protein that plays an important role in host defenses as an opsonin and through activation of the complement system. The objective of this study was to assess the interactions between MBL and severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike (S) glycoprotein (SARS-S). MBL was found to selectively bind to retroviral particles pseudotyped with SARS-S. Unlike several other viral envelopes to which MBL can bind, both recombinant and plasma-derived human MBL directly inhibited SARS-S-mediated viral infection. Moreover, the interaction between MBL and SARS-S blocked viral binding to the C-type lectin, DC-SIGN. Mutagenesis indicated that a single N-linked glycosylation site, N330, was critical for the specific interactions between MBL and SARS-S. Despite the proximity of N330 to the receptor-binding motif of SARS-S, MBL did not affect interactions with the ACE2 receptor or cathepsin L-mediated activation of SARS-S-driven membrane fusion. Thus, binding of MBL to SARS-S may interfere with other early pre- or postreceptor-binding events necessary for efficient viral entry.A novel coronavirus (CoV), severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV (SARS-CoV), is the causal agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome, which afflicted thousands of people worldwide in 2002 and 2003 (10, 39). SARS-CoV is an enveloped, single- and positive-strand RNA virus that encodes four major structural proteins: S, spike glycoprotein (GP); E, envelope protein; M, membrane glycoprotein; and N, nucleocapsid protein (46, 55). Similar to other coronaviruses, the S glycoprotein of the virus mediates the initial attachment of the virus to host cell receptors, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (44) and/or DC-SIGNR (dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin-related molecule; also CD209L or L-SIGN[liver/lymph node-SIGN]) (32) and subsequent fusion of the viral and cellular membranes to allow viral entry into susceptible target cells. The S glycoprotein of SARS-CoV (SARS-S) is a 1,255-amino-acid (aa) type I membrane glycoprotein (46) with 23 potential N-linked glycosylation sites (55). The S glycoproteins of some coronaviruses are translated as a large polypeptide that is subsequently proteolytically cleaved into two functional subunits, S1 (harboring the receptor-binding domain [RBD]) and S2 (containing the membrane fusion domains) (1, 31, 51), during biogenesis, but others are not. The S glycoprotein on mature SARS-CoV virions does not appear to be cleaved (50, 61), but sequence alignments with other coronavirus S glycoproteins allow definition of S1 and S2 regions (46, 55). More recently, studies showed the proteolysis of the S glycoprotein of SARS-CoV on mature virions by cathepsin L (CTSL) (28, 59), as well as trypsin (43, 61) and factor Xa (11), suggesting that a critical cleavage event may occur during cell entry rather than during virion biogenesis.Mannose-binding lectin (MBL; also known as mannose-binding or mannan-binding protein [MBP]) is a Ca²⁺-dependent (C-type) serum lectin that plays an important role in innate immunity by binding to carbohydrates on the surface of a wide range of pathogens (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa) (8, 14, 18), where it activates the complement system or acts directly as an opsonin (30, 40, 52). In order to activate the complement system, MBL must be in complex with a group of MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs), MASP-1, -2, and -3. Currently, only the role of MASP-2 in complement activation has been clearly defined (65). The MBL-MASP-2 complex cleaves C4 and C2 to form C3 convertase (C4bC2a), which, in turn, activates the downstream complement cascade. MBL is a pattern recognition molecule (9), and surface recognition is mediated through its C-terminal carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs), which are linked to collagenous stems by a short coiled-coil of alpha-helices. MBL is a mixture of oligomers assembled from subunits that are formed from three identical polypeptide chains (9) and usually has two to six clusters of CRDs. Within each of the clusters, the carbohydrate-binding sites have a fixed orientation, which allows selective recognition of patterns of carbohydrate residues on the surfaces of a wide range of microorganisms (8, 14, 18). The concentration of MBL in the serum varies greatly and is affected by mutations of the promoter and coding regions of the human MBL gene (45). MBL deficiency is associated with susceptibility to various infections, as well as autoimmune, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases, although MBL-deficient individuals are generally healthy (13, 37, 67).There are conflicting results with regard to the role of MBL in SARS-CoV infection (29, 42, 72, 73). While the association of MBL gene polymorphisms with susceptibility to SARS-CoV infection was reported in some studies (29, 73), Yuan et al. demonstrated that there were no significant differences in MBL genotypes and allele frequencies among SARS patients and controls (72). Ip et al. observed binding to, and inhibition of, SARS-CoV by MBL (29). However, in other studies, no binding of MBL to purified SARS-CoV S glycoprotein was detected (42).In this study, retroviral particles pseudotyped with SARS-S and in vitro assays were used to characterize the role of MBL in SARS-CoV infection. The data indicated that MBL selectively bound to SARS-S and mediated inhibition of viral infection in susceptible cell lines. Moreover, we identified a single N-linked glycosylation site, N330, on SARS-S that is critical for the specific interactions with MBL.     

A V3 Loop-Dependent gp120 Element Disrupted by CD4 Binding Stabilizes the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Trimer

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) entry into cells is mediated by a trimeric complex consisting of noncovalently associated gp120 (exterior) and gp41 (transmembrane) envelope glycoproteins. The binding of gp120 to receptors on the target cell alters the gp120-gp41 relationship and activates the membrane-fusing capacity of gp41. Interaction of gp120 with the primary receptor, CD4, results in the exposure of the gp120 third variable (V3) loop, which contributes to binding the CCR5 or CXCR4 chemokine receptors. We show here that insertions in the V3 stem or polar substitutions in a conserved hydrophobic patch near the V3 tip result in decreased gp120-gp41 association (in the unliganded state) and decreased chemokine receptor binding (in the CD4-bound state). Subunit association and syncytium-forming ability of the envelope glycoproteins from primary HIV-1 isolates were disrupted more by V3 changes than those of laboratory-adapted HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. Changes in the gp120 β2, β19, β20, and β21 strands, which evidence suggests are proximal to the V3 loop in unliganded gp120, also resulted in decreased gp120-gp41 association. Thus, a gp120 element composed of the V3 loop and adjacent beta strands contributes to quaternary interactions that stabilize the unliganded trimer. CD4 binding dismantles this element, altering the gp120-gp41 relationship and rendering the hydrophobic patch in the V3 tip available for chemokine receptor binding.The entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is mediated by the viral envelope glycoproteins (9, 79). The HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins are synthesized as an ∼850-amino acid precursor, which trimerizes and is posttranslationally modified by carbohydrates to create a 160-kDa glycoprotein (gp160). The gp160 envelope glycoprotein precursor is proteolytically processed in the Golgi apparatus, resulting in a gp120 exterior envelope glycoprotein and a gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoprotein (16, 17, 66, 76). In the mature HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimer, the three gp120 subunits are noncovalently bound to three membrane-anchored gp41 subunits (32).HIV-1 entry involves the binding of gp120 in a sequential fashion to CD4 and one of the chemokine receptors, CCR5 or CXCR4 (1, 8, 15, 18, 25, 36). CD4 binding triggers the formation of an activated intermediate that is competent for binding to CCR5 or CXCR4 (29, 69, 73, 78). These chemokine receptors are G protein-coupled, 7-transmembrane segment receptors with relatively short N termini. The choice of chemokine receptors is dictated primarily by the sequence of a gp120 region, the third variable (V3) loop, that exhibits variability among HIV-1 strains and becomes exposed upon CD4 binding (4, 8, 10, 33, 37, 38, 49, 59, 75). X-ray crystal structures of CD4-bound HIV-1 gp120 have revealed that the gp120 “core” consists of a gp41-interactive inner domain, a surface-exposed and heavily glycosylated outer domain, and a conformationally flexible bridging sheet (38, 43, 79). In the CD4-bound state, the V3 loop projects 30 Å from the gp120 core, toward the chemokine receptor (38). The V3 loop in these structures consists of three elements: (i) conserved antiparallel β strands that contain a disulfide bond at the base of the loop; (ii) a conformationally flexible stem; and (iii) a conserved tip (37, 38). During the virus entry process, the base of the gp120 V3 loop and elements of the bridging sheet interact with the CCR5 N terminus, which is acidic and contains sulfotyrosine residues (12-14, 23, 24). Sulfotyrosine 14 of CCR5 is thought to insert into a highly conserved pocket near the V3 base, driving further conformational rearrangements that result in the rigidification of the V3 stem (37). The conserved β-turn at the tip of the V3 loop, along with some residues in the V3 stem, is believed to bind the “body” of CCR5, i.e., the extracellular loops and membrane-spanning helices. CCR5 binding is thought to induce further conformational changes in the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins, leading to the fusion of the viral and target cell membranes by the gp41 transmembrane envelope glycoproteins.CCR5 binding involves two points of contact with the gp120 V3 loop: (i) the CCR5 N terminus with the V3 base and (ii) the CCR5 body with the V3 tip and distal stem (12-14, 23, 24, 37, 38). The intervening V3 stem can tolerate greater conformational and sequence variation, features that might decrease HIV-1 susceptibility to host antibodies (30). Despite amino acid variation, the length of the V3 loop is well conserved among naturally occurring group M (major group) HIV-1 strains (30, 42). This conserved length may be important for aligning the two CCR5-binding elements of the V3 loop. In addition to allowing optimal CCR5 binding, the conserved V3 length and orientation may be important for CCR5 binding to exert effects on the conformation of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. We examine here the consequences of introducing extra amino acid residues into the V3 stem. The residues were introduced either into both strands of the V3 loop, attempting to preserve the symmetry of the structure, or into one of the strands, thereby kinking the loop. The effects of these changes on assembly, stability, receptor binding, and the membrane-fusing capacity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins were assessed. In addition to effects on chemokine receptor binding, unexpected disruption of gp120-gp41 association was observed. Further investigation revealed a conserved patch in the tip of the V3 loop that is important for the association of gp120 with the trimeric envelope glycoprotein complex, as well as for chemokine receptor binding. Apparently, the V3 loop and adjacent gp120 structures contribute to the stability of the trimer in the unliganded HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. These structures are known to undergo rearrangement upon CD4 binding, suggesting their involvement in receptor-induced changes in the virus entry process.     

Cell-Cell Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Overcomes Tetherin/BST-2-Mediated Restriction in T cells

Direct cell-to-cell spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) between T cells at the virological synapse (VS) is an efficient mechanism of viral dissemination. Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is an interferon-induced, antiretroviral restriction factor that inhibits nascent cell-free particle release. The HIV-1 Vpu protein antagonizes tetherin activity; however, whether tetherin also restricts cell-cell spread is unclear. We performed quantitative cell-to-cell transfer analysis of wild-type (WT) or Vpu-defective HIV-1 in Jurkat and primary CD4⁺ T cells, both of which express endogenous levels of tetherin. We found that Vpu-defective HIV-1 appeared to disseminate more efficiently by cell-to-cell contact between Jurkat cells under conditions where tetherin restricted cell-free virion release. In T cells infected with Vpu-defective HIV-1, tetherin was enriched at the VS, and VS formation was increased compared to the WT, correlating with an accumulation of virus envelope proteins on the cell surface. Increasing tetherin expression with type I interferon had only minor effects on cell-to-cell transmission. Furthermore, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of tetherin decreased VS formation and cell-to-cell transmission of both Vpu-defective and WT HIV-1. Taken together, these data demonstrate that tetherin does not restrict VS-mediated T cell-to-T cell transfer of Vpu-defective HIV-1 and suggest that under some circumstances tetherin might promote cell-to-cell transfer, either by mediating the accumulation of virions on the cell surface or by regulating integrity of the VS. If so, inhibition of tetherin activity by Vpu may balance requirements for efficient cell-free virion production and cell-to-cell transfer of HIV-1 in the face of antiviral immune responses.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 can disseminate between and within hosts by cell-free infection or by direct cell-cell spread. Cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between CD4⁺ T cells is an efficient means of viral dissemination (65) and has been estimated to be several orders of magnitude more rapid than cell-free virus infection (6, 8, 41, 64, 74). Cell-cell transmission of HIV-1 takes place at the virological synapse (VS), a multimolecular structure that forms at the interface between an HIV-1-infected T cell and an uninfected target T cell during intercellular contact (27). Related structures that facilitate cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between dendritic cells and T cells (42) and between macrophages and T cells (16, 17) and for cell-cell spread of the related retrovirus human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) (24) have also been described. Moreover, more long-range cell-cell transfer can occur via cellular projections, including filopodia (71) and membrane nanotubes (75). The VS is initiated by binding of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env), which is expressed on the surfaces of infected T cells, to HIV-1 entry receptors (CD4 and either CXCR4 or CCR5) present on the target cell membrane (6, 22, 27, 41, 61, 73). Interactions between LFA-1 and ICAM-1 and ICAM-3 further stabilize the conjugate interface and, together with Env receptor binding, help trigger the recruitment of viral proteins, CD4/coreceptor, and integrins to the contact site (27, 28, 61). The enrichment of viral and cellular proteins at the VS is an active process, dependent on cytoskeletal remodeling, and in the infected T cell both the actin and tubulin network regulate polarization of HIV-1 proteins at the cell-cell interface, thus directing HIV-1 assembly and egress toward the engaged target cell (27, 29). Virus is transferred by budding into the synaptic cleft, and virions subsequently attach to the target cell membrane to mediate entry, either by fusion at the plasma membrane or possibly following endocytic uptake (2, 22). In this way, the VS promotes more rapid infection kinetics and may enhance HIV-1 pathogenesis in vivo.Cells have evolved a number of barriers to resist invading microorganisms. One mechanism that appears to be particularly important in counteracting HIV-1 infection is a group of interferon-inducible, innate restriction factors that includes TRIM5α, APOBEC3G, and tetherin (38, 49, 69, 79). Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is a host protein expressed by many cell types, including CD4⁺ T cells, that acts at a late stage of the HIV-1 life cycle to trap (or “tether”) mature virions at the plasma membranes of virus-producing cells, thereby inhibiting cell-free virus release (49, 56, 81). This antiviral activity of tetherin is not restricted to HIV-1, and tetherin can also inhibit the release of other enveloped viruses from infected cells (31, 40, 54, 62). What the cellular function of tetherin is besides its antiviral activity is unclear, but because expression is upregulated following alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β) treatment (1) and tetherin can restrict a range of enveloped viruses, tetherin has been postulated to be a broad-acting mediator of the innate immune defense against enveloped viruses.To circumvent restriction of particle release, HIV-1 encodes the 16-kDa accessory protein Vpu, which antagonizes tetherin and restores normal virus budding (47, 78). The molecular mechanisms by which Vpu does this are not entirely clear, but evidence suggests that Vpu may exert its antagonistic function by downregulating tetherin from the cell surface, trapping it in the trans-Golgi network (10) and targeting it for degradation by the proteasome (12, 39, 81) or lysosome (9, 25, 44); however, degradation of tetherin may be dispensable for Vpu activity (13), and in HIV-1-infected T cells, surface downregulation of tetherin has been reported to be minor (45), suggesting that global removal of tetherin from the plasma membrane may not be necessary to antagonize its function.Tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 and antagonism by Vpu have been the focus of much research, and inhibition of cell-free virus infection has been well documented (33, 47-49, 77, 81, 82). In contrast, less studied is the impact of tetherin on direct cell-cell dissemination. For example, it is not clear if tetherin-mediated restriction inhibits T cell-T cell spread as efficiently as cell-free release or whether tetherin affects VS formation. To address these questions, we analyzed Vpu⁺ and Vpu⁻ viruses for their ability to spread directly between Jurkat T cells and primary CD4⁺ T cells in the presence or absence of endogenous tetherin. Our data suggest that tetherin does not restrict HIV-1 in the context of cell-to-cell transmission of virus between T cells expressing endogenous tetherin. Interestingly, we also that observed that Vpu-defective virus may disseminate more efficiently by cell-cell spread at the VS. We postulate that cell-cell spread may favor viral pathogenesis by allowing HIV-1 to disseminate in the presence of tetherin during an interferon-producing innate response.