RNA Structures Required for Production of Subgenomic Flavivirus RNA

Flaviviruses are a group of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses causing ∼100 million infections per year. We have recently shown that flaviviruses produce a unique, small, noncoding RNA (∼0.5 kb) derived from the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the genomic RNA (gRNA), which is required for flavivirus-induced cytopathicity and pathogenicity (G. P. Pijlman et al., Cell Host Microbe, 4: 579-591, 2008). This RNA (subgenomic flavivirus RNA [sfRNA]) is a product of incomplete degradation of gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, which stalls on the rigid secondary structure stem-loop II (SL-II) located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR. Mutations or deletions of various secondary structures in the 3′ UTR resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3). Here, we investigated in detail the importance of West Nile virus Kunjin (WNV_KUN) 3′ UTR secondary structures as well as tertiary interactions for sfRNA formation. We show that secondary structures SL-IV and dumbbell 1 (DB1) downstream of SL-II are able to prevent further degradation of gRNA when the SL-II structure is deleted, leading to production of sfRNA2 and sfRNA3, respectively. We also show that a number of pseudoknot (PK) interactions, in particular PK1 stabilizing SL-II and PK3 stabilizing DB1, are required for protection of gRNA from nuclease degradation and production of sfRNA. Our results show that PK interactions play a vital role in the production of nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is essential for viral cytopathicity in cells and pathogenicity in mice.Arthropod-borne flaviviruses such as West Nile virus (WNV), dengue virus (DENV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) cause major outbreaks of potentially fatal disease and affect over 50 million people every year. The highly pathogenic North American strain of WNV (WNV_NY99) has already claimed more than 1,000 lives with over 27,000 cases reported since its emergence in New York in 1999 and has raised global public health concerns (9). In contrast, the closely related Australian strain of WNV, WNV_KUN, is highly attenuated and does not cause overt disease in humans and animals (11). WNV_KUN has been used extensively as a model virus to study flavivirus replication and flavivirus-host interactions (13, 14, 16-19, 26, 38, 39).The ∼11-kb positive-stranded, capped WNV genomic RNA (gRNA) lacks a poly(A) tail and consists of 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) flanking one open reading frame, which encodes the viral proteins required for the viral life cycle (6, 15, 38, 39). Flavivirus UTRs are involved in translation and initiation of RNA replication and likely determine genome packaging (13, 14, 16, 21, 30, 39-41). Both the 5′ UTR (∼100 nucleotides [nt] in size) and the 3′ UTR (from ∼400 to 700 nucleotides) can form secondary and tertiary structures which are highly conserved among mosquito-borne flaviviruses (1, 8, 10, 14, 29, 32, 34). More specifically, the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR consists of several conserved regions and secondary structures (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) which were previously predicted or shown to exist in various flaviviruses by computational and chemical analyses, respectively (4, 10, 25, 26, 29-32). The 5′ end of the 3′ UTR starts with an AU-rich region which can form stem-loop structure I (SL-I) followed by SL-II, which we previously showed to be vitally important for subgenomic flavivirus RNA (sfRNA) production (26; see also below). SL-II is followed by a short, repeated conserved hairpin (RCS3) and SL-III (26). Further downstream of SL-III are the SL-IV and CS3 structures, which are remarkably similar to the preceding SL-II-RCS3 structure (26, 29). Further downstream of the SL-IV-CS3 structure are dumbbells 1 and 2 (DB1 and DB2, respectively) followed by a short SL and the 3′ SL (25, 26).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(A) Model of the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR RNA structure. Highlighted in bold are the secondary structures investigated here. Dashed lines indicate putative PKs. The two sites of the putative PK interactions are shown in open boxes. sfRNA1, -2, -3, and -4 start sites are indicated by arrows. (R)CS, (repeated) conserved sequence; DB, dumbbell structure; PK, pseudoknot; SL, stem-loop. (B) Structural model of PK1 in SL-II with disruptive mutations. Nucleotide numbering is from the end of the 3′ UTR. The sfRNA1 start is indicated by an arrow. Nucleotides forming PK1 are on a gray background, and mutated nucleotides are white on a black background. (C) Sequences mutated in the different constructs. Nucleotides in the wt PK sequences used for mutations are bold and underlined. Introduced mutations are shown under the corresponding nucleotides in the wt sequence.The described structures have been investigated in some detail for their requirement in RNA replication and translation. Generally, a progressive negative effect on viral growth was shown with progressive deletions into the 3′-proximal region of the JEV 3′ UTR (41). However, only a relatively short region of the JEV 3′ UTR, consisting of the 3′-terminal 193 nt, was shown to be absolutely essential for gRNA replication (41). The minimal region for DENV replication was reported to be even shorter (23). Extensive analysis has shown that the most 3′-terminal, essential regions of the 3′ UTR include the cyclization sequence and 3′ SL, which are required for efficient RNA replication (2, 14, 16, 23, 35). As we showed, deletion of SL-II or SL-I did not overtly affect WNV_KUN replication (26). However, deletion of CS2, RCS2, CS3, or RCS3 in WNV replicon RNA significantly reduced RNA replication but not translation (20), indicating that these elements facilitate but are not essential for RNA replication. In addition, it was shown that deletion of DB1 or DB2 resulted in a viable mutant virus that was reduced in growth efficiency, while deletion of both DB structures resulted in a nonviable mutant (23).In addition to the above-mentioned secondary stem-loop structures, computational and chemical analysis of the flavivirus 3′ UTR suggested the presence of 5 pseudoknot (PK) interactions (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (25, 26, 32). A PK is a structure formed upon base pairing of a single-stranded region of RNA in the loop of a hairpin to a stretch of complementary nucleotides elsewhere in the RNA chain (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). These structures are referred to as hairpin type (H-type) PKs (3), and they usually stabilize secondary RNA structures. Typically, the final tertiary structure does not significantly alter the preformed secondary structure (5). In general, PK interactions have been shown to be important in biological processes such as initiation and/or elongation of translation, initiation of gRNA replication, and ribosomal frameshifting for a number of different viruses, including flaviviruses (reviewed in references 3 and 22). The first PK in the WNV 3′ UTR was predicted to form in SL-II, followed by a similar PK in SL-IV (26) (PK1 and PK2 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). For the DENV, yellow fever virus (YFV), and JEV subgroup of flaviviruses, two PKs further downstream were predicted to form between DB1 and DB2 and corresponding single-stranded RNA regions located further downstream (25) (PK3 and PK4 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). The formation of these structures is supported by covariations in the WNV RNAs. In addition, a PK was proposed to form between a short SL and the 3′ SL at the 3′ terminus of the viral genome (32) (PK5 in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A).Importantly, in addition to its role in viral replication and translation, we have shown that the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR is important for the production of a small noncoding RNA fragment designated sfRNA (26). This short RNA fragment of ∼0.5 kb is derived from the 3′ UTR of the gRNA and exclusively produced by the members of the Flavivirus genus of the Flaviviridae family, where it is required for efficient viral replication, cytopathicity, and pathogenicity (26). Our studies suggested that sfRNA is a product of incomplete degradation of the gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, resulting from XRN1 stalling on the rigid secondary/tertiary structures located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR (26). XRN1 is an exoribonuclease which usually degrades mRNA from the 5′ to the 3′ end as part of cellular mRNA decay and turnover (33), and it was shown previously that XRN1 can be stalled by SL structures (28). Mutations or deletions of WNV 3′ UTR secondary structures resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3) (26). In particular, SL-II (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) was shown to be important for sfRNA1 production; deletion of this structure either alone or in conjunction with other structures located downstream of SL-II abolished sfRNA1 production, leading to the production of the smaller RNA fragments sfRNA2 and sfRNA3.Here, we extended our investigation and studied the importance of several predicted 3′ UTR secondary structures and PK interactions for the production of sfRNA. To further understand the generation mechanism of sfRNA and its requirements, we deleted or mutated a number of RNA structures in the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR and investigated the size and amount of sfRNA generated from these mutant RNAs. The results show that not only SLs but also PK interactions play a vital role in stabilizing the 3′ UTR RNA and preventing complete degradation of viral gRNA to produce nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is required for efficient virus replication and cytopathicity in cells and virulence in mice.     

A Forward Genetic Strategy Reveals Destabilizing Mutations in the Ebolavirus Glycoprotein That Alter Its Protease Dependence during Cell Entry

Ebolavirus (EBOV) entry into cells requires proteolytic disassembly of the viral glycoprotein, GP. This proteolytic processing, unusually extensive for an enveloped virus entry protein, is mediated by cysteine cathepsins, a family of endosomal/lysosomal proteases. Previous work has shown that cleavage of GP by cathepsin B (CatB) is specifically required to generate a critical entry intermediate. The functions of this intermediate are not well understood. We used a forward genetic strategy to investigate this CatB-dependent step. Specifically, we generated a replication-competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus bearing EBOV GP as its sole entry glycoprotein and used it to select viral mutants resistant to a CatB inhibitor. We obtained mutations at six amino acid positions in GP that independently confer complete resistance. All of the mutations reside at or near the GP1-GP2 intersubunit interface in the membrane-proximal base of the prefusion GP trimer. This region forms a part of the “clamp” that holds the fusion subunit GP2 in its metastable prefusion conformation. Biochemical studies suggest that most of the mutations confer CatB independence not by altering specific cleavage sites in GP but rather by inducing conformational rearrangements in the prefusion GP trimer that dramatically enhance its susceptibility to proteolysis. The remaining mutants did not show the preceding behavior, indicating the existence of multiple mechanisms for acquiring CatB independence during entry. Altogether, our findings suggest that CatB cleavage is required to facilitate the triggering of viral membrane fusion by destabilizing the prefusion conformation of EBOV GP.Filoviruses are enveloped, filamentous, nonsegmented negative-sense RNA viruses that can cause a deadly hemorrhagic fever with case fatality rates in excess of 90% (see references 4, 20, and 37 for recent reviews). All known filoviruses belong to one of two genera: Ebolavirus (EBOV), consisting of the five species Zaire (ZEBOV), Côte d''Ivoire, Sudan, Reston, and Bundibugyo (tentative); and Marburgvirus, consisting of the single Lake Victoria species (21, 62).Cell entry by filoviruses is mediated by their envelope glycoprotein, GP (60, 68). Mature GP is a trimer of three disulfide-linked GP1-GP2 heterodimers. GP1 and GP2 are generated by endoproteolytic cleavage of the GP0 precursor polypeptide by a furin-like protease during transport to the cell surface (31, 39, 63, 69). The membrane-distal subunit, GP1, mediates viral adhesion to host cells (10, 18, 38, 42, 56, 59) and regulates the activity of the transmembrane subunit, GP2, which catalyzes fusion of viral and cellular membrane bilayers (30, 39, 41, 64, 65). The consequence of membrane fusion is cytoplasmic delivery of the viral nucleocapsid cargo.Lee et al. (39) recently solved the crystal structure of a ZEBOV GP prefusion trimer lacking the heavily glycosylated GP1 mucin domain (Muc) and the GP2 transmembrane domain (see Fig. ​Fig.5).5). The three GP1 subunits together form a bowl-like structure encircled by sequences from the three GP2 subunits. The trimer is held together by GP1-GP2 and GP2-GP2 contacts; the hydrophobic GP2 fusion loop packs against the external surface of adjacent GP1 subunits, and each GP2 subunit contributes a strand to a trimeric α-helical coiled-coil stem. GP1 is organized into three subdomains. The base is intimately associated with GP2 and clamps it in its prefusion conformation. The head is proposed to mediate virus receptor binding during entry (10, 18, 38, 42). The glycan cap resides at the top of the trimer and is critical for GP assembly but must be removed during entry (see below) (31, 42). The base and glycan cap are connected by the β13-β14 loop, which was not visualized in the structure. The location and structure of the Muc domain are also unknown, but it is proposed to sheathe the top and/or sides of the prefusion GP trimer (39). Muc is dispensable for ZEBOV GP-dependent entry in tissue culture but may play roles in virus-cell adhesion and immune evasion in vivo (31, 42, 44, 56, 59).Open in a separate windowFIG. 5.CA074^R mutations localize at or near the GP1-GP2 interface in the GP prefusion crystal structure. In all diagrams, GP1 is depicted in blue, GP2 in red, GP1 CA074^R mutations in green, and GP2 CA074^R mutations in yellow. (A) Linear representation of the amino acid sequence of GPΔMuc. S-S indicates the intersubunit disulfide bond between C53 and C609. sp, signal peptide; fl, fusion loop; hr1 and hr2, heptad repeats; tm, transmembrane domain; N, N terminus; C, C terminus. (B) Structure of GP in a prefusion conformation (39). Cartoon representation of a GP1-GP2 monomer is shown. Remaining subunits are shown as a surface-shaded watermark. The boxed inset contains the membrane-proximal base of the trimer, in which the CA074^R mutations are located. The β13-β14 loop is modeled as a chain of blue circles. (C) Magnified view of the inset shown in panel B rotated by 90°. The side chains of D47, I584, K588, and their contacting residues are shown. Dashed pink lines connect atoms from different side chains separated by ≤3.9 Å. Other CA074^R residues are not shown for clarity. (D) View shown in panel C rotated by 90°. (E) Schematic diagram of the potential interactions made by residues mutated in the CA074^R viruses. Residues approaching ≤3.9 Å to each CA074^R residue are shown. Beige arcs, hydrophobic interactions; dashed lines, potential ionic interactions. Visualizations of the GP structures shown in panels B to D (Protein Data Bank accession no. 3CSY) were rendered in Pymol (Delano Scientific).Crystal structures of ZEBOV GP2 in its postfusion conformation indicate that filovirus GP is a “class I” viral membrane fusion protein (41, 65). Like the prototypic class I fusion proteins of human immunodeficiency virus and influenza virus, GP2 contains a hydrophobic fusion peptide near its N terminus and N- and C-terminal α-helical heptad repeat sequences (HR1 and HR2, respectively) (22, 28, 30, 39, 41, 64, 65, 67) (see Fig. ​Fig.5).5). GP2 drives membrane fusion by undergoing large-scale conformational changes; the prefusion HR1 helix-loop-helix rearranges to an unbroken α-helix, projecting the fusion loop into the endosomal membrane, and GP2 jackknifes on itself to form a hairpin-like structure in which the HR2s pack against grooves in the trimeric HR1 coiled coil (41, 65).The available GP structures make clear that the transition of GP2 from prefusion to postfusion conformation requires its release from its binding groove in the GP1 base subdomain. For all known class I fusion proteins, this transition is controlled by priming and triggering events. Priming typically involves a single endoproteolytic cleavage of the glycoprotein mediated by a cellular protease within the secretory pathway of the virus-producer cells (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus ENV → SU + TM by furin [27]). This cleavage is essential because it liberates an N-terminal fusion peptide and allows the glycoprotein to rearrange during fusion. Unusually for a class I fusion glycoprotein, however, ZEBOV GP does not require cleavage to GP1 and GP2 by a furin-like protease, even though this cleavage occurs efficiently (46, 69). Instead, the GP trimer is primed by extensive proteolytic remodeling during entry. This process is mediated by cysteine cathepsins, a class of papain superfamily cysteine proteases active within the cellular endosomal/lysosomal pathway (14, 54).The cysteine cathepsins B (CatB) and L (CatL) play essential and accessory roles, respectively, in ZEBOV entry into Vero cells (14). The functions of these enzymes in viral entry can be recapitulated in vitro. Incubation of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) pseudotypes bearing ZEBOV GP (VSV-GP) with a mixture of purified human CatL and CatB, or with the bacterial protease thermolysin (THL), results in the cleavage and removal of GP1 Muc and glycan cap sequences, leaving a stable ∼17-kDa N-terminal GP1 fragment and intact GP2 (see Fig. ​Fig.5)5) (18, 54). VSV particles containing this GP_17K intermediate no longer require CatB activity within cells, strongly suggesting that this protease plays a critical role in generating a related primed species during viral entry (54). Strikingly, incubation of VSV-GP with CatL alone (14, 54) or with bovine chymotrypsin (CHT) (this study) (Fig. ​(Fig.1;1; see also Fig. ​Fig.7)7) generates a similar but distinct GP_18K intermediate (containing a slightly larger ∼18-kDa GP1 fragment) that cannot bypass the requirement for CatB during entry. Therefore, the removal of a few residues from GP_18K by CatB is crucial for viral entry. The reason for this requirement is unknown. Finally, VSV-GP_17K particles cannot infect cells completely devoid of cysteine cathepsin activity, indicating the existence of at least one additional cysteine protease-dependent step during entry (34, 54; present study). The signal that acts on a fully primed GP intermediate to trigger membrane fusion remains unknown.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.CatB activity is required for entry of ZEBOV GP-dependent entry, whereas CatL activity is dispensable. Vero cells were pretreated for 4 h with 1% (vol/vol) DMSO (vehicle), 0.5 μM FYdmk (CatL-selective inhibitor), 80 μM CA074 (CatB-selective inhibitor), 0.5 μM FYdmk plus 80 μM CA074, or 300 μM E64 (pan-cysteine cathepsin inhibitor). (A) The cells were then challenged with VSV-GPΔMuc, CHT-derived VSV-GP_18K (CHT-GP_18K), THL-derived VSV-GP_17K (THL-GP_17K), or VSV-G pseudotypes at a low MOI (0.02 to 0.1 eGFP-positive infectious units [iu] per cell) in the presence of drug, and viral titers (iu/ml) were determined at 18 h postinfection. CatB and CatL activities in extracts prepared from a parallel set of pretreated cells were measured by fluorogenic peptide turnover and are shown (bottom). Averages ± standard deviations (SD) for six trials from three independent experiments are shown. CatL activity below the detection threshold is indicated as zero without an accompanying SD. (B) Vero cells pretreated with protease inhibitors were challenged with VSV-GPΔMuc, cathepsin L-derived VSV-GP_18K (CatL-GP_18K), or cathepsin B-derived VSV-GP_17K (CatB-GP_17K), and viral infectivity was measured as described above. Averages ± SD for three trials from a representative experiment are shown.Open in a separate windowFIG. 7.rVSV-GPΔMuc mutants resemble the WT in cleavage to GP_18K and GP_17K intermediates. WT or mutant rVSV-GPΔMuc was incubated with the indicated protease(s) as described in Materials and Methods and then deglycosylated with PNGaseF (except for N40K and T42A, which lack the N40 glycan and do not require deglycosylation at this position). The resulting GP1 proteolytic fragments were resolved by SDS-PAGE and detected by Western blotting. Shorter protease incubation times were necessary to obtain cleavage intermediates for some mutants (see text for details). Positions of uncleaved GP1 and the ∼18-kDa and ∼17-kDa cleavage fragments are indicated on the left. *, partially cleaved GP fragment of unknown composition. Experimental samples shown on each gel (bold labels) were flanked by WT samples cleaved with CHT (WT 18K) or THL (WT 17K) to provide markers of band mobility.In this study, we used a forward genetic strategy to investigate the CatB-dependent step in ZEBOV entry. Specifically, we engineered and rescued a recombinant VSV (rVSV) encoding a mucin domain-deleted ZEBOV GP in place of the VSV glycoprotein G and used it to select viral mutants resistant to the CatB inhibitor CA074. Analysis of these viruses identified mutations in both GP1 and GP2 that allow CatB-independent cell entry. We found that GP_18K and/or GP_17K intermediates derived from some but not all of the mutant GPs are conformationally distinct from the wild type (WT), suggesting the existence of multiple mechanisms for CA074 resistance. Taken together, our results indicate that ZEBOV GP→GP_17K cleavage by CatB promotes fusion triggering and viral entry by destabilizing the prefusion conformation of GP.     

The S Helix Mediates Signal Transmission as a HAMP Domain Coiled-Coil Extension in the NarX Nitrate Sensor from Escherichia coli K-12

In the nitrate-responsive, homodimeric NarX sensor, two cytoplasmic membrane α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain. The HAMP domain, a four-helix parallel coiled-coil built from two α-helices (HD1 and HD2), immediately follows the second transmembrane helix. Previous computational studies identified a likely coiled-coil-forming α-helix, the signaling helix (S helix), in a range of signaling proteins, including eucaryal receptor guanylyl cyclases, but its function remains obscure. In NarX, the HAMP HD2 and S-helix regions overlap and apparently form a continuous coiled-coil marked by a heptad repeat stutter discontinuity at the distal boundary of HD2. Similar composite HD2-S-helix elements are present in other sensors, such as Sln1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We constructed deletions and missense substitutions in the NarX S helix. Most caused constitutive signaling phenotypes. However, strongly impaired induction phenotypes were conferred by heptad deletions within the S-helix conserved core and also by deletions that remove the heptad stutter. The latter observation illuminates a key element of the dynamic bundle hypothesis for signaling across the heptad stutter adjacent to the HAMP domain in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (Q. Zhou, P. Ames, and J. S. Parkinson, Mol. Microbiol. 73:801-814, 2009). Sequence comparisons identified other examples of heptad stutters between a HAMP domain and a contiguous coiled-coil-like heptad repeat sequence in conventional sensors, such as CpxA, EnvZ, PhoQ, and QseC; other S-helix-containing sensors, such as BarA and TorS; and the Neurospora crassa Nik-1 (Os-1) sensor that contains a tandem array of alternating HAMP and HAMP-like elements. Therefore, stutter elements may be broadly important for HAMP function.Transmembrane signaling in homodimeric bacterial sensors initiates upon signal ligand binding to the extracytoplasmic domain. In methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), the resulting conformational change causes a displacement of one transmembrane α-helix (TM α-helix) relative to the other. This motion is conducted by the HAMP domain to control output domain activity (reviewed in references 33 and 39).Certain sensors of two-component regulatory systems share topological organization with MCPs. For example, the paralogous nitrate sensors NarX and NarQ contain an amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module similar to those in MCPs, in which a pair of TM α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (24) (reviewed in references 32 and 62). The second TM α-helix connects to the HAMP domain. Hybrid proteins in which the NarX transmembrane signaling module regulates the kinase control modules of the MCPs Tar, DifA, and FrzCD demonstrate that NarX and MCPs share a mechanism for transmembrane signaling (73, 74, 81, 82).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.NarX modular structure. Linear representation of the NarX protein sequence, from the amino (N) to carboxyl (C) termini, drawn to scale. The four modules are indicated at the top of the figure and shown in bold typeface, whereas domains within each module are labeled with standard (lightface) typeface. The nomenclature for modules follows that devised by Swain and Falke (67) for MCPs. Overlap between the HAMP domain HD2 and S-helix elements is indicated in gray. The three conserved Cys residues within the central module (62) are indicated. TM1 and TM2 denote the two transmembrane helices. Helices H1 to H4 of the periplasmic domain (24), and the transmitter domain H, N, D, G (79), and X (41) boxes, are labeled. The HPK 7 family of transmitter sequences, including NarX, have no F box and an unconventional G box (79). The scale bar at the bottom of the figure shows the number of aminoacyl residues.The HAMP domain functions as a signal conversion module in a variety of homodimeric proteins, including histidine protein kinases, adenylyl cyclases, MCPs, and certain phosphatases (12, 20, 77). This roughly 50-residue domain consists of a pair of amphiphilic α-helices, termed HD1 and HD2 (formerly AS1 and AS2) (67), joined by a connector (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Results from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, Cys and disulfide scanning, and mutational analysis converge on a model in which the HD1 and HD2 α-helices form a four-helix parallel coiled-coil (7, 20, 30, 42, 67, 75, 84). The mechanisms through which HAMP domains mediate signal conduction remain to be established (30, 42, 67, 84) (for commentary, see references 43, 49, and 50).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.HAMP domain extensions. (A) Sequences from representative MCPs (E. coli Tsr and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium Tar) and S-helix-containing sensors (E. coli NarX, NarQ, and BarA, and S. cerevisiae Sln1p). The HAMP domain, S-helix element, and the initial sequence of the MCP adaptation region are indicated. Flanking numbers denote positions of the terminal residues within the overall sequence. Sequential heptad repeats are indicated in alternating bold and standard (lightface) typeface. Numbering for heptad repeats in the methylation region and S-helix sequences has been described previously (4, 8). Numbers within the HD1 and HD2 helices indicate interactions within the HAMP domain (42). Residues at heptad positions a and d are enclosed within boxes, residues at the stutter position a/d are enclosed within a thickly outlined box, and residues in the S-helix ERT signature are in bold typeface. (B) NarX mutational alterations. Deletions are depicted as boxes, and missense substitutions are shown above the sequence. Many of these deletions were reported previously (10) and are presented here for comparison. The phenotypes conferred by the alterations are indicated as follows: impaired induction, black box; constitutive and elevated basal, light gray box; reversed response, dark gray box; wild-type, white box; null, striped box.Coiled-coils result from packing of two or more α-helices (27). The primary sequence of coiled-coils exhibits a characteristic heptad repeat pattern, denoted as a-b-c-d-e-f-g (52, 61), in which positions a and d are usually occupied by nonpolar residues (reviewed in references 1, 47, and 80). For example, the coiled-coil nature of the HAMP domain can be seen in the heptad repeat patterns within the HD1 and HD2 sequences (Fig. ​(Fig.2A2A).Coiled-coil elements adjacent to the HAMP domain have been identified in several sensors, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sln1p (69) and Escherichia coli NarX (60). Recently, this element was defined as a specific type of dimeric parallel coiled-coil, termed the signaling helix (S helix), present in a wide range of signaling proteins (8). Sequence comparisons delimit a roughly 40-residue element with a conserved heptad repeat pattern (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Based on mutational analyses of Sln1p and other proteins, the S helix is suggested to function as a switch that prevents constitutive activation of adjacent output domains (8).The term “signaling helix” previously was used to define the α4-TM2 extended helix in MCPs (23, 33). Here, we use the term S helix to denote the element described by Anantharaman et al. (8).The NarX and NarQ sensors encompass four distinct modules (Fig. ​(Fig.1):1): the amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module, the signal conversion module (including the HAMP domain and S-helix element), the central module of unknown function, and the carboxyl-terminal transmitter module (62). The S-helix element presumably functions together with the HAMP domain in conducting ligand-responsive motions from the transmembrane signaling module to the central module, ultimately regulating transmitter module activity.Regulatory output by two-component sensors reflects opposing transmitter activities (reviewed in reference 55). Positive function results from transmitter autokinase activity; the resulting phosphosensor serves as a substrate for response regulator autophosphorylation. Negative function results from transmitter phosphatase activity, which accelerates phosphoresponse regulator autodephosphorylation (reviewed in references 64 and 65). We envision a homogeneous two-state model for NarX (17), in which the equilibrium between these mutually exclusive conformations is modulated by ligand-responsive signaling.Previous work from our laboratory concerned the NarX and other HAMP domains (9, 10, 26, 77) and separately identified a conserved sequence in NarX and NarQ sensors, the Y box, that roughly corresponds to the S helix (62). Therefore, we were interested to explore the NarX S helix and to test some of the predictions made for its function. Results show that the S helix is critical for signal conduction and suggest that it functions as an extension of the HAMP HD2 α-helix in a subset of sensors exemplified by Sln1p and NarX. Moreover, a stutter discontinuity in the heptad repeat pattern was found to be essential for the NarX response to signal and to be conserved in several distinct classes of HAMP-containing sensors.     

Impact of Quaternary Organization on the Antigenic Structure of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Envelope Glycoprotein E

The envelope protein E of flaviviruses mediates both receptor-binding and membrane fusion. At the virion surface, 180 copies of E are tightly packed and organized in a herringbone-like icosahedral structure, whereas in noninfectious subviral particles, 60 copies are arranged in a T=1 icosahedral symmetry. In both cases, the basic building block is an E dimer which exposes the binding sites for neutralizing antibodies at its surface. It was the objective of our study to assess the dependence of the antigenic structure of E on its quaternary arrangement, i.e., as part of virions, recombinant subviral particles, or soluble dimers. For this purpose, we used a panel of 11 E protein-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, mapped to distinct epitopes in each of the three E protein domains, and studied their reactivity with the different soluble and particulate forms of tick-borne encephalitis virus E protein under nondenaturing immunoassay conditions. Significant differences in the reactivities with these forms were observed that could be related to (i) limited access of certain epitopes at the virion surface; (ii) limited occupancy of epitopes in virions due to steric hindrance between antibodies; (iii) differences in the avidity to soluble forms compared to the virion, presumably related to the flexibility of E at its domain junctions; and (iv) modulations of the external E protein surface through interactions with its stem-anchor structure. We have thus identified several important factors that influence the antigenicity of the flavivirus E protein and have an impact on the interaction with neutralizing antibodies.Flaviviruses form a genus in the family Flaviviridae (52) and comprise a number of important human pathogens such as yellow fever, dengue, Japanese encephalitis, West Nile, and tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) viruses (30). They are small, enveloped viruses with only three structural proteins, designated C (capsid), M (membrane), and E (envelope). The E protein is oriented parallel to the viral membrane and forms a head-to-tail homodimeric complex (Fig. 1A and B). The structure of the E ectodomain (soluble E [sE])—consisting of about 400 amino acids and lacking the 100 C-terminal amino acids (including the so-called stem and two transmembrane helices)—has been determined by X-ray crystallography for several flaviviruses (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (25, 34, 36, 38, 44, 55). Both of the essential entry functions—receptor-binding and membrane fusion after uptake by receptor-mediated endocytosis—are mediated by E, which is therefore the primary target for virus-neutralizing antibodies (11, 42, 43, 45).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Structures and schematic representations of the TBE virus E protein, virions, and RSPs. In all panels, DI, DII, and DIII of the E protein are shown in red, yellow, and blue, respectively, and the fusion peptide (FP) is in orange. (A) Ribbon diagram of the sE dimer (top view). (B) Schematic of the full-length E dimer in a top view (upper panel) and side view (lower panel). The position of the two transmembrane helices of the membrane anchor and the two helices of the stem are based on Zhang et al. (54) and are shown in green and purple, respectively. (C) Pseudo-atomic structure of the virion based on cryo-EM reconstructions of dengue and West Nile viruses (27, 37, 54). One of the 30 rafts, each consisting of three parallel dimers, is highlighted. DIIIs of three monomers belonging to one icosahedral asymmetric unit are labeled by white stars. (D) Pseudo-atomic structure of RSP based on cryo-EM reconstructions (12).As revealed by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), mature infectious virions have smooth surfaces, comparable to a golf ball (27, 37). Their envelopes are icosahedrally symmetric and consist of a closed shell of 180 E monomers that are arranged in a herringbone-like pattern of 30 rafts of three dimers each (Fig. ​(Fig.1C)1C) (27). On the other hand, capsid-lacking subviral particles, which can be produced in recombinant form by the coexpression of prM and E, have a different symmetry, with 30 E dimers in a T=1 icosahedral structure (Fig. ​(Fig.1D)1D) (12, 49).The peculiar organization of E in virions is reminiscent of the tight packing of capsid proteins in nonenveloped viruses, for which it was shown that the native antigenic structure is strongly dependent on the intact capsid structure and not completely represented by isolated forms of capsid proteins (1, 41, 53). Such modulations of antigenic structure may be due to conformational changes in the course of packaging the capsid proteins into virions and/or to the fact that antibody binding sites at the virion surface are composed of residues that come together only through the juxtaposition of capsid proteins or neighboring protein subunits. Even in the case of spiky viral envelope proteins, the dependence of certain epitopes on the quaternary organization of the envelope glycoproteins has been described (8, 47).For flaviviruses, structural studies provide evidence for the considerable flexibility of E, especially at the junctions between the individual domains I, II, and III (DI, DII, and DIII) (7, 35, 55), suggesting that soluble forms may display differences in antigenic structure compared to those fixed in the closed envelope shell of whole virions. Furthermore, because of the tight packing of E at the virion surface, certain epitopes may be cryptic in the context of whole virus particles but accessible in soluble forms of E (40, 51).Studies on the antigenic structure of flaviviruses have used different antigen preparations including virions, recombinant subviral particles (RSPs), and soluble forms and subunits of E (10, 15-17, 32, 39, 40, 46, 49, 51), but so far no systematic comparative analysis of E in different physical forms and quaternary arrangements has been conducted. It was therefore the objective of our study, using TBE virus as a model, to investigate possible structural and/or antigenic differences between (i) soluble dimeric forms of E, including C-terminally truncated sE and detergent-solubilized full-length E (Fig. 1A and B); (ii) E in the context of whole virions (Fig. ​(Fig.1C);1C); and (iii) E in the context of RSPs (Fig. ​(Fig.1D).1D). For this purpose we used, and further characterized, a set of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to each of the three domains of E. All of these MAbs have neutralizing activity (17, 24) and therefore, by definition, react with infectious virions.Through these analyses, we demonstrate that the reactivity of several MAbs is significantly dependent on the quaternary arrangement of E and differs between virions, RSPs, and/or sE dimers. We thus provide evidence for previously unrecognized structural factors that have an impact on the antigenicity of the flavivirus E protein.     

Identification of the Biosynthetic Gene Cluster for the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimetabolite l-2-Amino-4-Methoxy-trans-3-Butenoic Acid

l-2-Amino-4-methoxy-trans-3-butenoic acid (AMB) is a potent antibiotic and toxin produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using a novel biochemical assay combined with site-directed mutagenesis in strain PAO1, we have identified a five-gene cluster specifying AMB biosynthesis, probably involving a thiotemplate mechanism. Overexpression of this cluster in strain PA7, a natural AMB-negative isolate, led to AMB overproduction.The Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that causes a wide range of human infections and is considered the main pathogen responsible for chronic pneumonia in cystic fibrosis patients (7, 23). P. aeruginosa also infects other organisms, such as insects (4), nematodes (6), plants (18), and amoebae (20). Its ability to thrive as a pathogen and to compete in aquatic and soil environments can be partly attributed to the production and interplay of secreted virulence factors and secondary metabolites. While the importance of many of these exoproducts has been studied, the antimetabolite l-2-amino-4-methoxy-trans-3-butenoic acid (AMB; methoxyvinylglycine) (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) has received only limited attention. Identified during a search for new antibiotics, AMB was found to reversibly inhibit the growth of Bacillus spp. (26) and Escherichia coli (25) and was later shown to inhibit the growth and metabolism of cultured Walker carcinosarcoma cells (28). AMB is a γ-substituted vinylglycine, a naturally occurring amino acid with a β,γ-C=C double bond. Other members of this family are aminoethoxyvinylglycine from Streptomyces spp. (19) and rhizobitoxine, made by Bradyrhizobium japonicum (16) and Pseudomonas andropogonis (15) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). As inhibitors of pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzymes (13, 17, 21, 22), γ-substituted vinylglycines have multiple targets in bacteria, animals, and plants (3, 5, 10, 21, 22, 29). However, the importance of AMB as a toxin in biological interactions with P. aeruginosa has not been addressed, as AMB biosynthesis and the genes involved have not been elucidated.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Chemical structures of the γ-substituted vinylglycines AMB, aminoethoxyvinylglycine, and rhizobitoxine.     

Interactions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles

The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms. Biofilm-derived membrane vesicles (MVs) and DNA, both matrix components, demonstrated concentration-, pH-, and cation-dependent interactions. Furthermore, MV-DNA association influenced MV surface properties. This bears consequences for the reactivity and availability for interaction of matrix polymers and other constituents.The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms and is crucial for the development of fundamental biofilm properties (46, 47). Early studies defined polysaccharides as the matrix component, but proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are all now acknowledged as important contributors (7, 15). Indeed, DNA has emerged as a vital participant, fulfilling structural and functional roles (1, 5, 6, 19, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44). The phosphodiester bond of DNA renders this polyanionic at a physiological pH, undoubtedly contributing to interactions with cations, humic substances, fine-dispersed minerals, and matrix entities (25, 41, 49).In addition to particulates such as flagella and pili, membrane vesicles (MVs) are also found within the matrices of gram-negative and mixed biofilms (3, 16, 40). MVs are multifunctional bilayered structures that bleb from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (reviewed in references 4, 24, 27, 28, and 30) and are chemically heterogeneous, combining the known chemistries of the biofilm matrix. Examination of biofilm samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has suggested that matrix material interacts with MVs (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Since MVs produced in planktonic culture have associated DNA (11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 30, 39, 48), could biofilm-derived MVs incorporate DNA (1, 39, 40, 44)?Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Possible interactions between matrix polymers and particulate structures. Shown is an electron micrograph of a thin section through a P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. During processing, some dehydration occurred, resulting in collapse of matrix material into fibrillate arrangements (black filled arrows). There is a suggestion of interactions occurring with particulate structures such as MVs (hollow white arrow) and flagella (filled white arrows) (identified by the appearance and cross-dimension of these highly ordered structures when viewed at high magnification), which was consistently observed with other embedded samples and also with whole-mount preparations of gently disrupted biofilms (data not shown). The scale bar represents 200 nm.     

Crystal Structure of a Novel Conformational State of the Flavivirus NS3 Protein: Implications for Polyprotein Processing and Viral Replication

The flavivirus genome comprises a single strand of positive-sense RNA, which is translated into a polyprotein and cleaved by a combination of viral and host proteases to yield functional proteins. One of these, nonstructural protein 3 (NS3), is an enzyme with both serine protease and NTPase/helicase activities. NS3 plays a central role in the flavivirus life cycle: the NS3 N-terminal serine protease together with its essential cofactor NS2B is involved in the processing of the polyprotein, whereas the NS3 C-terminal NTPase/helicase is responsible for ATP-dependent RNA strand separation during replication. An unresolved question remains regarding why NS3 appears to encode two apparently disconnected functionalities within one protein. Here we report the 2.75-Å-resolution crystal structure of full-length Murray Valley encephalitis virus NS3 fused with the protease activation peptide of NS2B. The biochemical characterization of this construct suggests that the protease has little influence on the helicase activity and vice versa. This finding is in agreement with the structural data, revealing a single protein with two essentially segregated globular domains. Comparison of the structure with that of dengue virus type 4 NS2B-NS3 reveals a relative orientation of the two domains that is radically different between the two structures. Our analysis suggests that the relative domain-domain orientation in NS3 is highly variable and dictated by a flexible interdomain linker. The possible implications of this conformational flexibility for the function of NS3 are discussed.Flaviviruses such as dengue virus (DENV), yellow fever virus (YFV), West Nile virus (WNV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) belong to the family Flaviviridae and are the causative agents of a range of serious human diseases including hemorrhagic fever, meningitis, and encephalitis (37). They remain a global health priority, as many viruses are endemic in large parts of the Americas, Africa, Australia, and Asia, and vaccines remain unavailable for most members (31, 46, 57).Flaviviruses have a positive-sense single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) genome (approximately 11 kb) that encodes one large open reading frame containing a 5′ type 1 cap and conserved RNA structures at both the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions that are important for viral genome translation and replication. The genomic RNA is translated into a single polyprotein precursor (11) consisting of three structural (C [capsid], prM [membrane], and E [envelope]) and seven nonstructural (NS1, NS2a, NS2b, NS3, NS4a, NS4b, and NS5) proteins arranged in the order C-prM-E-NS1-NS2a-NS2b-NS3-NS4a-NS4b-NS5 (reviewed in reference 33) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Only the structural proteins become part of the mature, infectious virion, whereas the nonstructural proteins are involved in polyprotein processing, viral RNA synthesis, and virus morphogenesis (33, 43). The precursor protein is directed by signal sequences into the host endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where NS1 and the exogenous domains of prM and E face the lumen, while C, NS3, and NS5 are cytoplasmic. NS2A, NS2B, NS4A, and NS4B are largely hydrophobic transmembrane proteins with small hydrophilic segments (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The post- and cotranslational cleavage of the polyprotein is performed by NS3 in the cytoplasm and by host proteases in the ER lumen to yield the mature proteins (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (33, 43). Of the nonstructural proteins, NS3 and NS5 are the best characterized, and both are essential for viral replication (23, 27, 41). Both proteins are multifunctional. The N-terminal one-third of NS3 contains the viral protease (NS3pro), which requires a portion of NS2B for its activity, while the remaining portion codes for the RNA helicase/NTPase/RTPase domain (NS3hel) (21, 22, 32, 55). NS5, however, contains both an N-terminal methyltransferase and a C-terminal RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (16, 51). The functions of NS1, NS2A, NS4A, and NS4B are not well understood, but they appear to play important roles in replication and virus assembly/maturation and have been found to bind to NS3 and NS5, possibly modulating their activity (33, 36).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic diagram of flavivirus polyprotein organization and processing. (Top) Linear organization of the structural and nonstructural proteins within the polyprotein. (Middle) Putative membrane topology of the polyprotein predicted from biochemical and cellular analyses, which is then processed by cellular and viral proteases (indicated by arrows). (Bottom) Different complexes that are thought to arise in different cellular compartments during and following polyprotein processing.Because of its enzymatic activities and its critical role in viral replication and polyprotein processing, NS3 constitutes a promising drug target for antiviral therapy (31). NS3pro (residues 1 to 169) is a trypsin-like serine protease with the characteristic catalytic triad (Asp-His-Ser) and a highly specific substrate recognition sequence, conserved in all flaviviruses, consisting of two basic residues in P2 and P1 followed by a small unbranched amino acid in P1′ (11). NS3pro has an aberrant fold compared to the canonical trypsin structure, and its folding and protease activity are dependent on a noncovalent association with a central 47-amino-acid hydrophilic domain of NS2B (19, 21). The remainder of NS2B contains three transmembrane helices involved in membrane associations. NS3 mediates cleavages at the C-terminal side of the highly conserved dibasic residue located at the coding junctions NS2A/NS2B, NS2B/NS3, NS3/NS4A, and NS4B/NS5 and also between the C terminus of C and NS4A (11, 33) (Fig. ​(Fig.11).The C-terminal portion of NS3 (NS3hel, residues 170 to 619) performs several catalytically related activities, namely, RNA strand separation and (poly)nucleotide hydrolysis (5, 22, 32, 55) at a common, RecA-like NTPase catalytic center that couples the energy released from the hydrolysis of the triphosphate moieties of nucleotides to RNA unwinding. Although the precise role of NS3 in replication has not been established, its helicase activity is thought to separate nascent RNA strands from the template strands and to assist replication initiation by unwinding RNA secondary structure in the 3′ untranslated region (11, 13, 15, 33). NS3 is a member of the DEAH/D box family within helicase superfamily 2 (SF2) and is characterized by seven conserved sequence motifs involved in nucleic acid binding and hydrolysis (45). In addition, its RNA triphosphatase activity is thought to be involved in the capping of the viral RNA. In the process of replication, NS3 interacts, most likely via its C-terminal domain, with NS5 (13, 15, 24, 26, 58, 62). The NS3 5′ triphosphatase and NS5 methyltransferase activities probably cooperate in cap formation by removing the terminal γ-phosphate and performing sequential N7 and 2′ O methylations, respectively (16, 28, 46, 56). The guanylyltransferase activity required for cap formation remains elusive at present, although recent evidence suggests that it may be present in NS5 (8, 17). In addition, the interaction between NS3 and NS5 can stimulate NS3 helicase/NTPase activity (15, 62).The atomic structures of NS3pro in the presence and absence of ligands and/or the NS2B activating domain (2, 19, 47) and NS3hel (35, 38, 39, 49, 58-60) are known, and recently, the structure of full-length DENV4 (one of four dengue virus serotypes) NS3 fused to an 18-residue NS2B cofactor (NS2B₁₈NS3) was reported (34). This structure revealed an elongated conformation, with the protease domain interfacing with the NTP binding pocket and being separated from NS3hel by a relatively flexible linker, which suggested that the protease domain may have a positive effect on the activity of the NTPase/helicase domain. However, other reports suggested that NS3pro has no or a very limited effect on the activity of NS3hel (32, 62). In addition, since current evidence suggests that NS2B is not part of the replication complex (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (36), and it is known that in the absence of the NS2B cofactor, NS3pro is unfolded and inactive, it becomes hard to envisage what effect the NS3 protease domain may have on the helicase domain in a biologically relevant context. Equally, it is still not clear what role the helicase domain plays during polyprotein processing by NS3pro and, in general, why these two apparently distinct and unrelated catalytic activities are harbored within a single polypeptide.In order to gain further insights into these questions, we report the biochemical analysis and crystallographic structure at a 2.75-Å resolution of full-length NS3 from Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV), a member of the JEV group of flaviviruses, fused to the entire protease activation peptide of the NS2B cofactor (NS2B₄₅NS3). The structure reveals the protease and helicase domains to be structurally independent and differs dramatically from the structure observed for DENV4 NS2B₁₈NS3. We discuss the implications of this unexpectedly different configuration of the NS3 protein and argue that the structural flexibility observed is likely to be crucial for its multifunctional nature.     

Mycoplasma pneumoniae Cytoskeletal Protein HMW2 and the Architecture of the Terminal Organelle

The terminal organelle of Mycoplasma pneumoniae mediates cytadherence and gliding motility and functions in cell division. The defining feature of this complex membrane-bound cell extension is an electron-dense core of two segmented rods oriented longitudinally and enlarging to form a bulb at the distal end. While the components of the core have not been comprehensively identified, previous evidence suggested that the cytoskeletal protein HMW2 forms parallel bundles oriented lengthwise to yield the major rod of the core. In the present study, we tested predictions emerging from that model by ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopy analyses of cores from wild-type M. pneumoniae and mutants producing HMW2 derivatives. Antibodies specific for the N or C terminus of HMW2 labeled primarily peripheral to the core along its entire length. Furthermore, truncation of HMW2 did not correlate specifically with core length. However, mutant analysis correlated specific HMW2 domains with core assembly, and examination of core-enriched preparations confirmed that HMW2 was a major component of these fractions. Taken together, these findings yielded a revised model for HMW2 in terminal organelle architecture.Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a cell wall-less pathogen of the human respiratory tract causing community-acquired tracheobronchitis and atypical, or “walking,” pneumonia (38). Colonization of the respiratory mucosa is mediated in large part by the terminal organelle, a polar, tapered extension of the mycoplasma cell having a high density of receptor-binding proteins (4, 22, 28). The terminal organelle also constitutes the motor in gliding motility (5, 11), and its duplication precedes cell division (5, 12, 32).Ultrastructurally, the terminal organelle is defined by a characteristic electron-dense core consisting of a thick rod and a thin rod oriented longitudinally in parallel and capped by a terminal button at the distal end (4, 16, 17, 39, 41). The core and terminal button are elements of the mycoplasma cytoskeleton (triton shell), a complex network of proteins resistant to extraction with Triton X-100 (TX) (1, 7, 24), much like the cytoskeletal fraction of eukaryotic cells (18, 33, 34). The composition of the M. pneumoniae triton shell has been examined by using antibody probes (22) and by mass spectrometry (29), but the identities of proteins specific to the electron-dense core are largely unknown, although cores fail to assemble in the absence of cytoskeletal proteins HMW1 and HMW2, both of which localize to the terminal organelle (3, 31, 36).HMW2 is a large protein (1,818 residues) predicted to have a globular N terminus followed by 10 dimeric or trimeric coiled-coil domains interspersed with leucine zipper motifs (23) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Spontaneously arising mutant I-2 lacks HMW2 due to a frameshift in the corresponding MPN310 open reading frame, which also encodes protein P28 at its 3′ end, in the same reading frame encoding HMW2 (6). Mutants C1 and H9 are similar to mutant I-2 but result from Tn4001 disruption of MPN310 (15, 23) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The loss of HMW2 and the inability of these mutants to assemble a core are accompanied by an abnormal morphology, reduced levels of terminal organelle proteins HMW1, HMW3, P24, P28, P41, and P65, failure to localize the major adhesin P1 to the terminal organelle, and the loss of cytadherence (6, 20, 22, 31). Imprecise transposon excision from mutant C1 yielded excision revertant C1R1, having an in-frame deletion in MPN310 that truncates HMW2 and eliminates P28 (6) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Analysis using immunofluorescence (40) or fluorescent protein fusions (3, 19) localizes HMW2 generally to the terminal organelle. Based on its localization, its requirement for core formation, and its deduced length relative to that of the core, we proposed previously that HMW2 is a major component of the electron-dense core and, with P28, may form bundles oriented longitudinally to yield the large rod of the core (3).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Structural features of the indicated wild-type (WT), engineered, and mutant HMW2 proteins. White boxes, predicted dimeric coiled coils; black boxes, predicted trimeric coiled coils; dark gray boxes, leucine zipper motifs; arrows, predicted N terminus of P28; black triangles, cysteine residues. The numbers above each diagram correspond to the coiled-coil regions, while the letters below correspond to the leucine zipper motifs.In the present study, we explored further the role of HMW2 in core formation relative to the current model, by which (i) HMW2 is predicted to orient with its N- and C-terminal domains at the ends of the large rod of the core and (ii) mutants producing shorter HMW2 proteins are expected to have correspondingly shorter cores. We report here the successful localization of HMW2 by immunoelectron microscopy (immuno-EM) and the ultrastructural analysis of electron-dense cores in several HMW2 truncation mutants, allowing us to correlate specific regions of HMW2 with normal core formation. Finally, we evaluated core enrichment following detergent and salt extractions, demonstrating that HMW2 was a major component of a core-enriched fraction (CEF). Alternative models for HMW2 in core architecture are considered, based on our observations.