Capacitation state-dependent changes in adenosine receptors and their regulation of adenylyl cyclase/cAMP

This study was designed to localize adenosine receptors and to provide evidence that specific receptors are active only in either uncapacitated or capacitated mouse spermatozoa, where they play a role in regulating cAMP production. Using specific antibodies, stimulatory A(2A) receptors were localized primarily on the acrosomal cap region and the flagellar principal piece. Interestingly, the staining was much more pronounced in uncapacitated than in capacitated spermatozoa, suggesting capacitation-dependent changes in epitope accessibility. A(1) receptors showed a very similar distribution, but the staining was markedly greater in capacitated than in uncapacitated cells. After addition of purified decapacitation factor (DF) to capacitated cells, strong staining for A(2A) was regained, suggesting reversibility in epitope accessibility. Chlortetracycline analysis revealed that an agonist specific for A(2A) receptors had no detectable effect on capacitated cells, but after DF-induced decapacitation, the agonist then stimulated capacitation. That agonist also significantly stimulated cAMP production in uncapacitated cells, had no effect on capacitated cells, but regained the ability to stimulate cAMP in the latter following DF treatment. In contrast, an A(1) agonist inhibited cAMP in capacitated cells. These results indicate that specific adenosine receptors function in a reversible manner in one or other capacitation state, resulting in regulation of cAMP.     

Permissive role of adenosine A2A receptors on metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5)-mediated effects in the striatum

The metabotropic glutamate receptors 5 (mGlu5Rs) and the adenosine A2A receptors (A2ARs) have been reported to functionally interact in the striatum. The aim of the present work was to verify the hypothesis that the state of activation of A2A Rs could influence mGlu5R-mediated effects in the striatum. In electrophysiological experiments (extracellular recording in rat corticostriatal slices), the ability of the selective mGlu5R agonist CHPG to potentiate the reduction of the field potential amplitude induced by NMDA was prevented not only by the selective mGlu5R antagonist MPEP, but also by the selective A2AR antagonist ZM 241385. Analogously, the application of CHPG potentiated NMDA-induced toxicity (measured by LDH release) in cultured striatal neurons, an effect that was abolished by both MPEP and ZM 241385. Finally, the A2AR agonist CGS 21680 potentiated CHGP effects, an action that was reproduced and abolished, respectively, by forskolin (an activator of the cAMP/protein kinase A, PKA, pathway) and KT 5720 (a PKA inhibitor). The results indicate that A2ARs exert a permissive role on mGlu5R-induced effects in the striatum. Such an interaction may represent an additional target for the development of therapeutic strategies towards striatal disorders.     

Chronic intake of caffeine during gestation down regulates metabotropic glutamate receptors in maternal and fetal rat heart

Summary. Caffeine is the most widely consumed substance in the world which antagonizes adenosine effects. Adenosine acting through A₁ receptors inhibits glutamate release which binds to metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Recently, we have shown that maternal caffeine intake during gestation causes down-regulation of A₁ and metabotropic glutamate receptors in the brain of both rat mothers and fetuses. In the present work we provide evidence that caffeine also affects receptors in hearts, causing a decrease in mGluRs from both maternal and fetal hearts. A decrease in G_q/11 and PLC β₁ proteins level was also observed in both tissues. However, phospholipase C activity was only affected in fetal heart, being significantly decreased. These results suggest an in vivo cross-talk mechanism between adenosine and glutamate receptors in peripheral tissues. Therefore, special attention should be paid to caffeine ingestion during gestation.     

Regulation of A(2A) adenosine receptor expression and functioning following permanent focal ischemia in rat brain

Ischemia, through modulation of adenosine receptors (ARs), may influence adenosine-mediated-cellular responses. In the present study, we investigated the modulation of rat A_2A receptor expression and functioning, in rat cerebral cortex and striatum, following in vivo focal ischemia (24 h). In cortex, middle cerebral artery occlusion did not induce any alterations in A_2A receptor binding and functioning. On the contrary, in striatum, a significant decrease in A_2A ligand affinity, associated with an increase in receptor density, were detected. In striatum, ischemia also induced a significant reduction both in G protein pool and in A_2A receptor-G protein coupling. On the contrary, A_2A receptor functional responsiveness, measured as stimulation of adenylyl cyclise, was not affected by ischemia, suggesting receptor up-regulation may represent a compensatory mechanism to maintain receptor functioning during cerebral damage. Immunohistochemical study showed that following 24 h middle cerebral artery occlusion, A_2A ARs were definitely expressed both on neurons and activated microglia in ischemic striatum and cortex, but were not detected on astrocytes. In the non-ischemic hemisphere and in sham-operated rats A_2A ARs were barely detected. Modifications of ARs may play a significant role in determining adenosine effects during ischemia and therefore should be taken into account when evaluating time-dependent protective effects of specific A_2A active compounds.     

Genetic inactivation of the adenosine A(2A) receptor exacerbates brain damage in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Studies with multiple sclerosis patients and animal models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) implicate adenosine and adenosine receptors in modulation of neuroinflammation and brain injury. Although the involvement of the A(1) receptor has been recently demonstrated, the role of the adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A) R) in development of EAE pathology is largely unknown. Using mice with genetic inactivation of the A(2A) receptor, we provide direct evidence that loss of the A(2A) R exacerbates EAE pathology in mice. Compared with wild-type mice, A(2A) R knockout mice injected with myelin oligodendroglia glycoprotein peptide had a higher incidence of EAE and exhibited higher neurological deficit scores and greater decrease in body weight. A(2A) R knockout mice displayed increased inflammatory cell infiltration and enhanced microglial cell activation in cortex, brainstem, and spinal cord. In addition, demyelination and axonal damage in brainstem were exacerbated, levels of Th1 cytokines increased, and Th2 cytokines decreased. Collectively, these findings suggest that extracellular adenosine acting at A(2A) Rs triggers an important neuroprotective mechanism. Thus, the A(2A) receptor is a potential target for therapeutic approaches to multiple sclerosis.     

Modulation of adenylyl cyclase by FPP and adenosine involves stimulatory and inhibitory adenosine receptors and g proteins

FPP and adenosine modulate the adenylyl cyclase (AC)/cAMP signal transduction pathway in mammalian spermatozoa to elicit a biphasic response, initially stimulating capacitation and then inhibiting spontaneous acrosome loss. This study addressed the hypothesis that responses to FPP involve interactions between receptors for FPP and adenosine, the biphasic responses involving stimulatory and inhibitory adenosine receptors. Gln‐FPP, a competitive inhibitor of FPP, significantly inhibited binding of an adenosine analogue and responses to adenosine, especially in capacitated suspensions, consistent with interaction between FPP and adenosine receptors. CGS‐21680 (1 μM), a stimulatory A_2a adenosine receptor agonist, significantly stimulated capacitation and cAMP in uncapacitated cells, while cyclopentyl adenosine (1 μM), an inhibitory A₁ adenosine receptor agonist only affected capacitated cells, inhibiting spontaneous acrosome loss. Responses to FPP and adenosine were inhibited in uncapacitated cells by a selective A_2a antagonist and in capacitated cells by a selective A₁ antagonist; subsequent investigations indicated possible involvement of G proteins. Like FPP, cholera toxin stimulated capacitation and cAMP production in uncapacitated cells, suggesting involvement of a G protein with a Gα_s subunit. In contrast, pertussis toxin prevented FPP's inhibition of both spontaneous acrosome loss and cAMP production, suggesting involvement of a Gα_i/_o subunit. Immunoblotting evidence revealed the presence of proteins of the appropriate molecular weights for Gα_s, Gα_i2, Gα _i3, and Gα_o subunits. This study provides the first direct evidence suggesting the involvement of two different types of adenosine receptors and both Gα_s and Gα_i/_o subunits in the regulation of capacitation, resulting in modulation of AC activity and availability of cAMP. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 53:459–471, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Adenosine A 2A receptor antagonists prevent the increase in striatal glutamate levels induced by glutamate uptake inhibitors

Active uptake by neurons and glial cells is the main mechanism for maintaining extracellular glutamate at low, non-toxic concentrations. Activation of adenosine A(2A) receptors increases extracellular glutamate levels, while A(2A) receptor antagonists reduce stimulated glutamate outflow. Whether a modulation of the glutamate uptake system is involved in the effects elicited by A(2A) receptor blockers has never been investigated. This study examined the ability of adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists to prevent the increase in glutamate levels induced by blockade of the glutamate uptake. In rats implanted with a microdialysis probe in the dorsal striatum, perfusion with 4 mm l-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylic acid (PDC, a transportable competitive inhibitor of glutamate uptake), or 10 mm dihydrokainic acid (DHK, a non-transportable competitive inhibitor that mainly blocks the glial glutamate transporter GLT-1), significantly increased extracellular glutamate levels. The effects of PDC and DHK were completely prevented by the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists SCH 58261 (0.01 mg/kg i.p.) and/or ZM 241385 (5 nm via probe). Since an impairment in glutamate transporter function is thought to play a major role in neurodegenerative disorders, the regulation of glutamate uptake may be one of the mechanisms of the neuroprotective effects of A(2A) receptor antagonists.     

Alterations in 5-HT(1A) receptors and adenylyl cyclase response by trazodone in regions of rat brain

The in vivo effect of trazodone on the density of [(3)H]5-HT binding sites and 5-HT(1A) receptors and adenylyl cyclase (AC) response was studied in regions of rat brain. The chronic administration of trazodone (10 mg/Kg body wt, 40 days) resulted in a significant downregulation of [(3)H]5-HT binding sites and 5-HT(1A) receptors in cortex and hippocampus. Trazodone significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased the density of [(3)H]5-HT binding sites in cortex (42.6 +/- 3.6 fmol/mg protein, 65%) and hippocampus (12.6 +/- 1.6 fmol/mg protein, 87%) when compared to control values of 121.9 +/- 5.4 and 99.3 +/- 7.5 fmol/mg protein in these regions, respectively. Similarly there was a significant (p < 0.0001) decrease in the density of 5-HT(1A) receptors in both cortex (7.2 +/- 0.5 fmol/mg protein, 70%) and hippocampus (6.3 +/- 1.2 fmol/mg protein, 79%) when compared to control values of 24.2 +/- 2.1 and 30.6 +/- 3.7 fmol/mg protein, in these regions respectively. However, the affinity of [(3)H]5-HT to 5-HT binding sites (1.83 +/- 0.26 nM, p < 0.0001) and [(3)H]8-OH-DPAT to 5-HT(1A) receptors (0.60 +/- 0.06 nM, p < 0.05) was significantly decreased only in cortex when compared to the control K(d) values of 0.88 +/- 0.04 nM and 0.47 +/- 0.02 nM in these regions, respectively.The basal AC activity did not alter in treated rats, where as, the inhibition of forskolin-stimulated AC activity by 5-HT (10 microM) was significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased both in cortex (43%) and hippocampus (40%) when compared to control levels. In conclusion, chronic treatment with trazodone results in downregulation of 5-HT(1A) receptors in cortex and hippocampus along with concomitant increased AC response, suggesting the involvement of 5-HT(1A) receptor-mediated AC response in the mechanism of action of trazodone.     

Neuroprotection afforded by adenosine A2A receptor blockade is modulated by corticotrophin‐releasing factor (CRF) in glutamate injured cortical neurons

In situations of hypoxia, glutamate excitotoxicity induces neuronal death. The release of extracellular adenosine is also triggered and is accompanied by an increase of the stress mediator, corticotrophin‐releasing factor (CRF). Adenosine A_2A receptors contribute to glutamate excitoxicity and their blockade is effective in stress‐induced neuronal deficits, but the involvement of CRF on this effect was never explored. We now evaluated the interaction between A_2A and CRF receptors (CRFR) function, upon glutamate insult. Primary rat cortical neuronal cultures (9 days in vitro) expressing both CRF₁R and CRF₂R were challenged with glutamate (20–1000 μM, 24 h). CRF₁R was found to co‐localize with neuronal markers and CRF₂R to be present in both neuronal and glial cells. The effects of the CRF and A_2A receptors ligands on cell viability were measured using propidium iodide and Syto‐13 fluorescence staining. Glutamate decreased cell viability in a concentration‐dependent manner. Urocortin (10 pM), an agonist of CRF receptors, increased cell survival in the presence of glutamate. This neuroprotective effect was abolished by blocking either CRF₁R or CRF₂R with antalarmin (10 nM) or anti‐Sauvagine‐30 (10 nM), respectively. The blockade of A_2A receptors with a selective antagonist SCH 58261 (50 nM) improved cell viability against the glutamate insult. This effect was dependent on CRF₂R, but not on CRF₁R activation. Overall, these data show a protective role of CRF in cortical neurons, against glutamate‐induced death. The neuroprotection achieved by A_2A receptors blockade requires CRF₂R activation. This interaction between the adenosine and CRF receptors can explain the beneficial effects of using A_2A receptor antagonists against stress‐induced noxious effects.     

Cardioprotective effects of adenosine A1 and A 3 receptor activation during hypoxia in isolated rat cardiac myocytes

Adenosine (ADO) is a well-known regulator of a variety of physiological functions in the heart. In stress conditions, like hypoxia or ischemia, the concentration of adenosine in the extracellular fluid rises dramatically, mainly through the breakdown of ATP. The degradation of adenosine in the ischemic myocytes induced damage in these cells, but it may simultaneously exert protective effects in the heart by activation of the adenosine receptors. The contribution of ADO to stimulation of protective effects was reported in human and animal hearts, but not in rat hearts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of adenosine A₁ and A₃ receptors (A₁R and A₃R), in protection of isolated cardiac myocytes of newborn rats from ischemic injury. The hypoxic conditions were simulated by exposure of cultured rat cardiomyocytes (4–5 days in vitro), to an atmosphere of a N₂ (95%) and CO₂ (5%) mixture, in glucose-free medium for 90 min. The cardiotoxic and cardioprotective effects of ADO ligands were measured by the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the medium. Morphological investigation includes immunohistochemistry, image analysis of living and fixed cells and electron microscopy were executed. Pretreatment with the adenosine deaminase considerably increased the hypoxic damage in the cardiomyocytes indicating the importance of extracellular adenosine. Blocking adenosine receptors with selective A₁ and A₃ receptor antagonists abolished the protective effects of adenosine. A₁R and A₃R activation during the hypoxic insult delays onset of irreversible cell injury and collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential as assessed using DASPMI fluorochrom. Cardioprotection induced by the A₁R agonist, CCPA, was abolished by an A₁R antagonist, DPCPX, and was not affected by an A₃R antagonist, MRS1523. Cardioprotection caused by the A₃R agonist, Cl-IB-MECA, was antagonized completely by MRS1523 and only partially by DPCPX. Activation of both A₁R and A₃R together was more efficient in protection against hypoxia than by each one alone. Our study indicates that activation of either A₁ or A₃ adenosine receptors in the rat can attenuate myocyte injury during hypoxia. Highly selective A₁R and A₃R agonists may have potential as cardioprotective agents against ischemia or heart surgery.     

Cortical 5-HT(1A) receptor downregulation by antidepressants in rat brain

Total 5-HT binding sites and 5-HT_1A receptor density was measured in brain regions of rats treated with imipramine (5 mg/kg body wt), desipramine (10 mg/kg body wt) and clomipramine (10 mg/kg body wt), for 40 days, using [³H]5-HT and [³H]8-OH-DPAT, respectively. It was observed that chronic exposure to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) results in significant downregulation of total [³H]5-HT binding sites in cortex (42–76%) and hippocampus (35–67%). The 5-HT_1A receptor density was, however, decreased significantly (32–60%) only in cortex with all the three drugs. Interestingly, in hippocampus imipramine treatment increased the 5-HT_1A receptor density (14%). The affinity of [³H]8-OH-DPAT was increased only with imipramine treatment both in cortex and hippocampus. The affinity of [³H]5-HT to 5-HT binding sites in cortex was increased with imipramine treatment and decreased with desipramine and clomipramine treatment. 5-HT sensitive adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity was significantly increased in cortex with imipramine (72%) and clomipramine (17%) treatment, whereas in hippocampus only imipramine treatment significantly increased AC activity (50%). In conclusion, chronic treatment with TCAs results in downregulation of cortical 5-HT_1A receptors along with concomitant increase in 5-HT stimulated AC activity suggesting the involvement of cortical 5-HT_1A receptors in the mechanism of action of TCAs.     

Repeated cocaine administration changes the function and subcellular distribution of adenosine A1 receptor in the rat nucleus accumbens

Adenosine A1 receptor (A1) protein and mRNA is increased in the nucleus accumbens following repeated cocaine treatment. In spite of this protein up-regulation, A1 agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding was attenuated in accumbens homogenates of rats withdrawn for 3 weeks from 1 week of daily cocaine injections. Cellular subfractionation revealed that the discrepancy between total A1 protein and G protein coupling resulted from a smaller proportion of receptors in the plasma membrane. The decrease in functional receptor in the plasma membrane was further indicated by diminished formation of heteromeric receptor complex consisting of A1 and dopamine D1A receptors. To explore the functional significance of the altered distribution of A1 receptors, at 3 weeks after discontinuing repeated cocaine or saline, animals were injected with cocaine and 45 min later the subcellular distribution of A1 receptors quantified. Whereas a cocaine challenge in repeated saline-treated animals induced a marked increase in membrane localization of the A1 receptor, the relative distribution of receptors in repeated cocaine rats was not affected by acute cocaine. These data suggest that the sorting and recycling of A1 receptors is dysregulated in the nucleus accumbens as the consequence of repeated cocaine administration.     

Adenosine A2A receptors and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors are co-localized and functionally interact in the hippocampus: a possible key mechanism in the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate effects

Hippocampal metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGlu5Rs) regulate both physiological and pathological responses to glutamate. Because mGlu5R activation enhances NMDA-mediated effects, and given the role played by NMDA receptors in synaptic plasticity and excitotoxicity, modulating mGlu5R may influence both the physiological and the pathological effects elicited by NMDA receptor stimulation. We evaluated whether adenosine A2A receptors (A(2A)Rs) modulated mGlu5R-dependent effects in the hippocampus, as they do in the striatum. Co-application of the A(2A)R agonist CGS 21680 with the mGlu5R agonist (RS)-2-chloro-s-hydroxyphenylglycine(CHPG) synergistically reduced field excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices. Endogenous tone at A(2A)Rs seemed to be required to enable mGlu5R-mediated effects, as the ability of CHPG to potentiate NMDA effects was antagonized by the selective A(2A)R antagonist ZM 241385 in rat hippocampal slices and cultured hippocampal neurons, and abolished in the hippocampus of A(2A)R knockout mice. Evidence for the interaction between A(2A)Rs and mGlu5Rs was further strengthened by demonstrating their co-localization in hippocampal synapses. This is the first evidence showing that hippocampal A(2A)Rs and mGlu5Rs are co-located and act synergistically, and that A(2A)Rs play a permissive role in mGlu5R receptor-mediated potentiation of NMDA effects in the hippocampus.     

Agonist-induced internalization and recycling of the human A(3) adenosine receptors: role in receptor desensitization and resensitization

A(3) adenosine receptors have been proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia with a regimen-dependent nature of the therapeutic effects probably related to receptor desensitization and down-regulation. Here we studied the agonist-induced internalization of human A(3) adenosine receptors in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells, and then we evaluated the relationship between internalization and signal desensitization and resensitization. Binding of N(6)-(4-amino-3-[(125)I]iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide to membranes from Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the human A(3) adenosine receptor showed a profile typical of these receptors in other cell lines (K:(D) = 1.3+/-0.08 nM; B(max) = 400+/-28 fmol/mg of proteins). The iodinated agonist, bound at 4 degrees C to whole transfected cells, was internalized by increasing the temperature to 37 degrees C with a rate constant of 0.04+/-0.034 min(-1). Agonist-induced internalization of A(3) adenosine receptors was directly demonstrated by immunogold electron microscopy, which revealed the localization of these receptors in plasma membranes and intracellular vesicles. Moreover, short-term exposure of these cells to the agonist caused rapid desensitization as tested in adenylyl cyclase assays. Subsequent removal of the agonist led to restoration of the receptor function and recycling of the receptors to the cell surface. The rate constant of receptor recycling was 0.02+/-0.0017 min(-1). Blockade of internalization and recycling demonstrated that internalization did not affect signal desensitization, whereas recycling of internalized receptors was implicated in the signal resensitization.     

Differential nature of cross-talk among three G-coupled receptors regulating adenylyl cyclase in rat cardiomyocytes chronically exposed to receptor agonists

Chronic exposure of cells to cognate agonists has been established to cause homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors. In this work, we show that exposure of adult rat eardiomyoeytes to isoproterenol (ISO) for 24 h led to the desensitization of -adrenoceptor (-AR) coupled adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity, which was associated with an increased inhibition of AC by M₂-muscarinic receptor (MR) agonist, carbachol (Cch), and a decreased inhibition of AC by A₁-adenosine receptor (AdR) agonist, N6-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA). Chronic exposure of eells to Cch caused the desensitization of M₂-MR-coupled AC, decreased the inhibitory action of R-PIA on AC and increased ISO-stimulated AC, while chronic exposure to R-PIA caused the desensitization of A₁-AdR-coupled AC and modestly increased ISO-stimulated AC without any significant effect on Cch inhibition of the enzyme. Thus, chronic exposure ol cardiomyocytes revealed for the first time a more complex and differential nature of cross-talk among the three major G-coupled receptors in modulating AC.     

Regulation of A2B adenosine receptor functioning by tumour necrosis factor a in human astroglial cells

Low-affinity A2B adenosine receptors (A2B ARs), which are expressed in astrocytes, are mainly activated during brain hypoxia and ischaemia, when large amounts of adenosine are released. Cytokines, which are also produced at high levels under these conditions, may regulate receptor responsiveness. In the present study, we detected A2B AR in human astrocytoma cells (ADF) by both immunoblotting and real-time PCR. Functional studies showed that the receptor stimulated adenylyl cyclase through Gs proteins. Moreover, A2B ARs were phosphorylated and desensitized following stimulation of the receptors with high agonist concentration. Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) treatment (24- h) increased A2B AR functional response and receptor G protein coupling, without any changes in receptor protein and mRNA levels. TNF-alpha markedly reduced agonist-dependent receptor phosphorylation on threonine residues and attenuated agonist-mediated A2B ARs desensitization. In the presence of TNF-alpha, A2B AR stimulation in vitro induced the elongation of astrocytic processes, a typical morphological hallmark of in vivo reactive astrogliosis. This event was completely prevented by the selective A2B AR antagonist MRS 1706 and required the presence of TNF-alpha. These results suggest that, in ADF cells, TNF-alpha selectively modulates A2B AR coupling to G proteins and receptor functional response, providing new insights to clarify the pathophysiological role of A2B AR in response to brain damage.     

Adenosine A(1) receptor in cultured neurons from rat cerebral cortex: colocalization with adenosine deaminase

Adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)Rs) have been characterized in primary cultures of neurons from cerebral cortex. The specific adenosine A(1) antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-[(3)H]dipropylxanthine bound to both membranes and intact cells. When saturation experiments were performed in membranes, a K(D) value of 0.76 nM and a B(max) of 57 fmol/mg of protein were obtained. Competition assays revealed a pharmacological profile characteristic of A(1)Rs. The presence of this receptor was further confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. The expression of the receptor showed no significant changes during the period of culture studied, up to 12 days in vitro. A(1)R agonist inhibited forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase, showing the functional coupling of these receptors with the effector. alphaG(i1, 2) protein level, detected by immunoblot, presented an increase during the period of culture. This increase correlated with an increase in the mRNA level of alphaG(i1) but not alphaG(i2). By immunochemical assays, it is shown that these receptors are expressed in both the neuronal cell body and the proximal dendrites. Colocalization of A(1)Rs with microtubule-associated protein 2 and cell surface adenosine deaminase was shown by confocal microscopy. The high degree of colocalization observed between A(1)Rs and ectoadenosine deaminase in neurons could suggest an important role of the enzyme in adenosine-mediated neuromodulation.     

Co-localization and functional interaction between adenosine A(2A) and metabotropic group 5 receptors in glutamatergic nerve terminals of the rat striatum

The anti-Parkinsonian effect of glutamate metabotropic group 5 (mGluR5) and adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists is believed to result from their ability to postsynaptically control the responsiveness of the indirect pathway that is hyperfunctioning in Parkinson's disease. mGluR5 and A(2A) antagonists are also neuroprotective in brain injury models involving glutamate excitotoxicity. Thus, we hypothesized that the anti-Parkinsonian and neuroprotective effects of A(2A) and mGluR5 receptors might be related to their control of striatal glutamate release that actually triggers the indirect pathway. The A(2A) agonist, CGS21680 (1-30 nM) facilitated glutamate release from striatal nerve terminals up to 57%, an effect prevented by the A(2A) antagonist, SCH58261 (50 nM). The mGluR5 agonist, CHPG (300-600 mum) also facilitated glutamate release up to 29%, an effect prevented by the mGluR5 antagonist, MPEP (10 microm). Both mGluR5 and A(2A) receptors were located in the active zone and 57 +/- 6% of striatal glutamatergic nerve terminals possessed both A(2A) and mGluR5 receptors, suggesting a presynaptic functional interaction. Indeed, submaximal concentrations of CGS21680 (1 nM) and CHPG (100 microm) synergistically facilitated glutamate release and the facilitation of glutamate release by 10 nM CGS21680 was prevented by 10 microm MPEP, whereas facilitation by 300 microm CHPG was prevented by 10 nM SCH58261. These results provide the first direct evidence that A(2A) and mGluR5 receptors are co-located in more than half of the striatal glutamatergic terminals where they facilitate glutamate release in a synergistic manner. This emphasizes the role of the modulation of glutamate release as a likely mechanism of action of these receptors both in striatal neuroprotection and in Parkinson's disease.