The interrelation of the polytene chromosomes of generative tissues in Drosophila melanogaster]

The principles of three dimensional organization of primary and secondary orders polytene chromosomes in ovarian nurse cells of Drosophila melanogaster were elucidated. Contrary to somatic tissues, no joining of chromosome arms into local chromocentre was discovered. The chromosomes are separated in the nuclear space and are attached to the nuclear envelope by the centromeric (and the XL arm--by the telomeric) sites, the arms of autosomes (especially primary polytene chromosomes) being separated in the area of attachment. Polytenized XR arm of the X chromosomes were discovered. The architecture of chromosomes discovered in ovarian nurse cells is tissue-specific and differs considerably from the organization of polytene chromosomes of somatic tissues.     

A Reanalysis of Protein Polymorphism in Drosophila Melanogaster, D. Simulans, D. Sechellia and D. Mauritiana: Effects of Population Size and Selection

Comparison of synonymous and nonsynonymous variation/substitution within and between species at individual genes has become a widely used general approach to detect the effect of selection versus drift. The sibling species group comprised of two cosmopolitan (Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans) and two island (Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila sechellia) species has become a model system for such studies. In the present study we reanalyzed the pattern of protein variation in these species, and the results were compared against the patterns of nucleotide variation obtained from the literature, mostly available for melanogaster and simulans. We have mainly focused on the contrasting patterns of variation between the cosmopolitan pair. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) As expected the island species D. mauritiana and D. sechellia showed much less variation than the cosmopolitan species D. melanogaster and D. simulans. (2) The chromosome 2 showed significantly less variation than chromosome 3 and X in all four species which may indicate effects of past selective sweeps. (3) In contrast to its overall low variation, D. mauritiana showed highest variation for X-linked loci which may indicate introgression from its sibling, D. simulans. (4) An average population of D. simulans was as heterozygous as that of D. melanogaster (14.4% v.s. 13.9%) but the difference was large and significant when considering only polymorphic loci (37.2% v.s. 26.1%). (5) The species-wise pooled populations of these two species showed similar results (all loci = 18.3% v.s. 20.0%, polymorphic loci = 47.2% v.s. 37.6%). (6) An average population of D. simulans had more low-frequency alleles than D. melanogaster, and the D. simulans alleles were found widely distributed in all populations whereas the D. melanogaster alleles were limited to local populations. As a results of this, pooled populations of D. melanogaster showed more polymorphic loci than those of D. simulans (48.0% v.s. 32.0%) but the difference was reduced when the comparison was made on the basis of an average population (29.1% v.s. 21.4%). (7) While the allele frequency distributions within populations were nonsignificant in both D. melanogaster and D. simulans, melanogaster had fewer than simulans, but more than expected from the neutral theory, low frequency alleles. (8) Diallelic loci with the second allele with a frequency less than 20% had similar frequencies in all four species but those with the second allele with a frequency higher than 20% were limited to only melanogaster the latter group of loci have clinal (latitudinal) patterns of variation indicative of balancing selection. (9) The comparison of D. simulans/D. melanogaster protein variation gave a ratio of 1.04 for all loci and 1.42 for polymorphic loci, against a ratio of approximately 2-fold difference for silent nucleotide sites. This suggests that the species ratios of protein and silent nucleotide polymorphism are too close to call for selective difference between silent and allozyme variation in D. simulans. In conclusion, the contrasting levels of allozyme polymorphism, distribution of rare alleles, number of diallelic loci and the patterns of geographic differentiation between the two species suggest the role of natural selection in D. melanogaster, and of possibly ancient population structure and recent worldwide migration in D. simulans. Population size differences alone are insufficient as an explanation for the patterns of variation between these two species.     

Differences in Crossover Frequency and Distribution among Three Sibling Species of Drosophila

Comparisons of the genetic and cytogenetic maps of three sibling species of Drosophila reveal marked differences in the frequency and cumulative distribution of crossovers during meiosis. The maps for two of these species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, have previously been described, while this report presents new map data for D. mauritiana, obtained using a set of P element markers. A genetic map covering nearly the entire genome was constructed by estimating the recombination fraction for each pair of adjacent inserts. The P-based genetic map of mauritiana is ~1.8 times longer than the standard melanogaster map. It appears that mauritiana has higher recombination along the entire length of each chromosome, but the difference is greatest in centromere-proximal regions of the autosomes. The mauritiana autosomes show little or no centromeric recombinational suppression, a characteristic that is prominent in melanogaster. D. simulans appears to be intermediate both in terms of total map length and intensity of the autosomal centromeric effect. These interspecific differences in recombination have important evolutionary implications for DNA sequence organization and variability. In particular, mauritiana is expected to differ from melanogaster in patterns and amounts of sequence variation and transposon insertions.     

Courtship song recognition in the Drosophila melanogaster complex: heterospecific songs make females receptive in D. melanogaster, but not in D. sechellia

Abstract. The courtship song emitted by male wing vibration has been regarded as one of the most important signals in sexual isolation in the species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex. Inter- and intraspecific crosses were observed using males whose wings were removed (mute) or females whose aristae were removed (deaf). Females of D. melanogaster, D. simulans , and D. mauritiana mated with heterospecific males in the song-present condition (cross between normal females and winged males) more often than in the no-song condition (cross between normal females and wingless males or between aristaless females and winged males) or they showed no preference between the two conditions. It is possible that in these females heterospecific courtship songs play a role as if they were conspecific. In contrast, the females of D. sechellia mated with D. melanogaster or D. simulans males in the no-song condition more often than in the song-present condition, suggesting that they reject males with heterospecific song. Female mate recognition depending on the courtship song in D. melanogaster, D. simulans , and D. mauritiana is considered to be relatively broader and that in D. sechellia narrower.     

Chromosome localization of the lambda20p1.4 clone of the Drosophila melanogaster nuclear lamina DNA in the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora)

Chromosome localization of sequences homologous to lambda 20p1.4 of the Drosophila melanogaster nuclear lamina DNA (nlDNA) was established by in situ hybridization in species of the melanogaster subgroup. DNA of the lambda 20p1.4 clone was shown to be located in the chromocenter in all the species examined. Laboratory strains of D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia exhibited interspecific differences in localization of lambda 20p1.4 nlDNA on chromosome arms. In eight natural populations, intraspecific polymorphism of lambda 20p1.4 nlDNA chromosome localization was shown to be present in D. simulans but absent in D. melanogaster. The possible participation of transposable elements in nlDNA relocation is discussed.     

Distribution and conservation of sequences homologous to the 1731 retrotransposon in Drosophila

The distribution of 1731 retrotransposon-hybridizing sequences in the family Drosophilidae has been studied using a 1731 probe from Drosophila melanogaster. Squash blot and Southern blot analyses of 42 species reveal that the 1731 sequences are widespread within both the Sophophora and Drosophila subgenera and are also present in the genera Scaptomyza and Zaprionus. Hence the 1731 retrotransposon family appears to have a long evolutionary history in the Drosophilidae genome. Differences of hybridization signal intensity suggested that the 1731 sequence is well conserved only in the three species most closely related to D. melanogaster (D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia). A survey of insertion sites in numerous different populations of the previous four species by in situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes has shown in all cases both chromocentric hybridizations and a low number of sites (0-5) on the chromosomal arms. This number of sites is among the lowest observed in D. melanogaster and D. simulans when 1731 is compared with other retrotransposon families. In addition, we have observed species-specific patterns of the chromocentric hybridization signal, suggesting rapid modifications of the beta-heterochromatin components since the radiation of the melanogaster subgroup.      

hobo transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Genomic patterns of occurrence of the transposable element hobo are polymorphic in the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Most tested strains of both species have apparently complete (3.0 kb) and smaller hobo elements (H lines), but in both species some strains completely lack such canonical hobo elements (E lines). The occurrence of H and E lines in D. simulans as well as in D. melanogaster implies that an hypothesis of recent introduction in the latter species is inadequate to explain the phylogenetic occurrence of hobo. Particular internally deleted elements, the approximately 1.5 kb Th1 and Th2 elements, are abundant in many lines of D. melanogaster, and an analogous 1.1 kb internally deleted element, h del sim, is abundant in most lines of D. simulans. Besides the canonical hobo sequences, both species (and their sibling species D. sechellia and D. mauritiana) have many hobo-hybridizing sequences per genome that do not appear to be closely related to the canonical hobo sequence.     

Analysis of copia sequence variation within and between Drosophila species

The sequences of the 5' long-terminal repeat (LTR) and adjacent leader regions of 27 full-length copia elements isolated from natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. mauritiana are presented. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that although D. melanogaster copia elements are distinct from those of D. simulans and D. mauritiana, the elements of these latter two species are not distinguishable from one another. LTRs and adjacent 5' leader regions of elements isolated from D. simulans and D. mauritiana are structurally similar to one another and carry substantial deletional variation mapping to regions previously identified as being of potential importance for copia expression.      

Patterns of Microsatellite Variability in the Drosophila Melanogaster Complex

Forty-seven microsatellite loci were amplified in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila sechellia. The two cosmopolitan species D. melanogaster and D. simulans were found to be the most variable ones, followed by D. mauritiana and D. sechellia. A model based clustering algorithm was applied to the population samples of D. melanogaster, D. simulans and D. sechellia. No evidence for population substructure was detected within species--most likely due to insufficient power. A Markov chain Monte Carlo method developed for demographic inference based on microsatellites provided unambiguous evidence for population contraction in D. melanogaster, D. simulans and D. sechellia, despite that the D. melanogaster and D. simulans population samples were of non-African origin and represented recently expanded populations.     

Intraspecific diversity of nucleotide sequences within the adenine + thymine-rich region of mitochondrial DNA molecules of Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) molecules from Drosophila mauritiana, D. melanogaster, and D. simulans contain a single adenine + thymine (A+T)-rich region, which is similarly located in all molecules, but varies in size among these species. Using agarose gel electrophoresis and electron microscopy, a difference in occurrence of one EcoRI site, and a difference in size (approximately 0.7 kb) of the A+T-rich regions was found between mtDNA molecules of flies of two female lines of D. mauritiana. In heteroduplexes constructed between these two kinds of mtDNA molecules, two or three regions of strand separation, each comprising single strands of unequal length, were apparent near the center of the A+T-rich region. Using the structural differences between D. mauritiana mtDNA molecules it was demonstrated the mtDNA of this species is maternally inherited. Differences in length of A+T-rich regions were also found between mtDNA molecules of two geographically separated strains of D. melanogaster, and between mtDNA molecules of two geographically separated strains of D. simulans. However, in both cases, in heteroduplexes constructed between mtDNA molecules of different strains of one species, the A+T-rich regions appeared completely paired.     

Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex

Two regions of the genome, a 1-kbp portion of the zeste locus and a 1.1- kbp portion of the yolk protein 2 locus, were sequenced in six individuals from each of four species: Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia. The species and strains were the same as those of a previous study of a 1.9-kbp region of the period locus. No evidence was found for recent balancing or directional selection or for the accumulation of selected differences between species. Yolk protein 2 has a high level of amino acid replacement variation and a low level of synonymous variation, while zeste has the opposite pattern. This contrast is consistent with information on gene function and patterns of codon bias. Polymorphism levels are consistent with a ranking of effective population sizes, from low to high, in the following order: D. sechellia, D. melanogaster, D.mauritiana, and D. simulans. The apparent species relationships are very similar to those suggested by the period locus study. In particular, D. simulans appears to be a large population that is still segregating variation that arose before the separation of D. mauritiana and D. sechellia. It is estimated that the separation of ancestral D. melanogaster from the other species occurred 2.5-3.4 Mya. The separations of D. sechellia and D. mauritiana from ancestral D. simulans appear to have occurred 0.58- 0.86 Mya, with D. mauritiana having diverged from ancestral D. simulans 0.1 Myr more recently than D. sechellia.      

Horizontal transfer of hobo transposable elements within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex: evidence from DNA sequencing.

The hobo family of transposable elements, one of three transposable-element families that cause hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster, appears to be present in all members of the D. melanogaster species complex: D. melanogaster, D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia. Some hobo-hybridizing sequences are also found in the other members of the melanogaster subgroup and in many members of the related montium subgroup. Surveys of older isofemale lines of D. melanogaster suggest that complete hobo elements were absent prior to 50 years ago and that hobo has recently been introduced into the species by horizontal transfer. To test the horizontal transfer hypothesis, the 2.6-kb XhoI fragments of hobo elements from D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. mauritiana were cloned and sequenced. The DNA sequences reveal an extremely low level of divergence and support the conclusion that the active hobo element has been horizontally transferred into or among these species in the recent past.     

Recurrent deletion and gene presence/absence polymorphism: telomere dynamics dominate evolution at the tip of 3L in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans

Although Drosophila melanogaster has been the subject of intensive analysis of polymorphism and divergence, little is known about the distribution of variation at the most distal regions of chromosomes arms. Here we report a survey of genetic variation on the tip of 3L in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Levels of single nucleotide polymorphism in the most distal euchromatic sequence are approximately one order of magnitude less than that typically observed in genomic regions of normal crossing over, consistent with what might be expected under models of linked selection in regions of low crossing over. However, despite this reduced level of nucleotide variation, we found abundant deletion polymorphism. These deletions create at least three gene presence/absence polymorphisms within D. melanogaster: the putative G-protein coupled receptor mthl-8 (which is the most distal known or predicted gene on 3L) and the unannotated mRNAs AY060886 and BT006009. Strikingly, D. simulans is also segregating deletions that cause mthl8 presence/absence polymorphism. Breakpoint sequencing and tests of correlations with segregating SNPs in D. melanogaster suggest that each deletion is unique. Cloned breakpoint sequences revealed the presence of Het-A elements just distal to unique, canonical euchromatic sequences. This pattern suggests a model in which repeated telomeric deficiencies cause deletions of euchromatic sequence followed by subsequent "healing" by retrotranposition of Het-A elements. These data reveal the dominance of telomeric dynamics on the evolution of closely linked sequences in Drosophila.     

Comparative analysis of the localization and mobility of retrotransposons in sibling species Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster]

The distribution of four retrotransposon families (MDG1, MDG3, MDG4 and copia) on polytene chromosomes of different (from 9 to 15) Drosophila simulans strains is studied. The mean number of MDG1 and copia euchromatic hybridization sites (3 sites for each element) is drastically decreased in D. simulans in comparison with D. melanogaster (24 and 18 sites respectively). The mean number of MDG3 sites of hybridization is 5 in D. simulans against 12 in D. melanogaster. As for MDG4 both species have on the average about 2-3 euchromatic sites. The majority of MDG1 and copia and about a half of MDG3 euchromatic copies are localized in restricted number of sites (hot spots) on D. simulans polytene chromosomes. In D. melanogaster these elements are scattered along the chromosomes though there are some hot spots too. It appears that euchromatic copies of MDG1 and copia are considerably less mobile in D. simulans in contrast to D. melanogaster. Some common hot spots of retrotransposon localization in D. simulans and D. melanogaster were earlier described as intercalary heterochromatin regions in D. melanogaster. The level of interstrain variability of MDG4 hybridization sites is comparable in both species. Comparative blot-analysis of adult and larval salivary gland DNA shows that MDG1 and copia are situated mainly in euchromatic regions of D. melanogaster chromosomes. In D. simulans genome they are located mainly in heterochromatic regions underreplicated in salivary gland polytene chromosomes. There are interspecies differences in the distribution of retrotransposons in beta-heterochromatic chromosome regions.     

Inviability of hybrids between D. melanogaster and D. simulans results from the absence of simulans X not the presence of simulans Y chromosome.

Interspecific crosses between D. melanogaster and D. simulans or its sibling species result in unisexual inviability of the hybrids. Mostly, crosses of D. melanogaster females x D. simulans males produce hybrid females. On the other hand, only hybrid males are viable in the reciprocal crosses. A classical question is the cause of the unisexual hybrid inviability on the chromosomal level. Is it due to the absence of a D. simulans X chromosome or is it due to the presence of a D. simulans Y chromosome? A lack of adequate chromosomal rearrangements available in D. simulans has made it difficult to answer this question. However, it has been assumed that the lethality results from the absence of the D. simulans X rather than the presence of the D. simulans Y. Recently I synthesized the first D. simulans compound-XY chromosome that consists of almost the entire X and Y chromosomes. Males carrying the compound-XY and no free Y chromosome are fertile. By utilizing the compound-XY chromosome, the viability of hybrids with various constitutions of cytoplasm and sex chromosomes has been examined. The results consistently demonstrate that the absence of a D. simulans X chromosome in hybrid genome, and not the presence of the Y chromosome, is a determinant of the hybrid inviability.     

Hybrid Lethal Systems in the Drosophila Melanogaster Species Complex. II. the Zygotic Hybrid Rescue (Zhr) Gene of D. Melanogaster

Hybrid females from Drosophila simulans females X Drosophila melanogaster males die as embryos while hybrid males from the reciprocal cross die as larvae. We have recovered a mutation in melanogaster that rescues the former hybrid females. It was located on the X chromosome at a position close to the centromere, and it was a zygotically acting gene, in contrast with mhr (maternal hybrid rescue) in simulans that rescues the same hybrids maternally. We named it Zhr (Zygotic hybrid rescue). The gene also rescues hybrid females from embryonic lethals in crosses of Drosophila mauritiana females X D. melanogaster males and of Drosophila sechellia females X D. melanogaster males. Independence of the hybrid embryonic lethality and the hybrid larval lethality suggested in a companion study was confirmed by employing two rescue genes, Zhr and Hmr (Hybrid male rescue), in doubly lethal hybrids. A model is proposed to explain the genetic mechanisms of hybrid lethalities as well as the evolutionary pathways.     

Incompatibility between X chromosome factor and pericentric heterochromatic region causes lethality in hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling species

The Dobzhansky-Muller model posits that postzygotic reproductive isolation results from the evolution of incompatible epistatic interactions between species: alleles that function in the genetic background of one species can cause sterility or lethality in the genetic background of another species. Progress in identifying and characterizing factors involved in postzygotic isolation in Drosophila has remained slow, mainly because Drosophila melanogaster, with all of its genetic tools, forms dead or sterile hybrids when crossed to its sister species, D. simulans, D. sechellia, and D. mauritiana. To circumvent this problem, we used chromosome deletions and duplications from D. melanogaster to map two hybrid incompatibility loci in F(1) hybrids with its sister species. We mapped a recessive factor to the pericentromeric heterochromatin of the X chromosome in D. simulans and D. mauritiana, which we call heterochromatin hybrid lethal (hhl), which causes lethality in F(1) hybrid females with D. melanogaster. As F(1) hybrid males hemizygous for a D. mauritiana (or D. simulans) X chromosome are viable, the lethality of deficiency hybrid females implies that a dominant incompatible partner locus exists on the D. melanogaster X. Using small segments of the D. melanogaster X chromosome duplicated onto the Y chromosome, we mapped a dominant factor that causes hybrid lethality to a small 24-gene region of the D. melanogaster X. We provide evidence suggesting that it interacts with hhl(mau). The location of hhl is consistent with the emerging theme that hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila involve heterochromatic regions and factors that interact with the heterochromatin.     

Evidence for Complex Genic Interactions between Conspecific Chromosomes Underlying Hybrid Female Sterility in the Drosophila Simulans Clade

F(1) hybrid females between the sibling species Drosophila simulans, Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila sechellia are completely fertile. However, we have found that female sterility can be observed in F(2) backcross females who are homozygous for D. simulans X chromosomes and homozygous for autosomal regions from either D. mauritiana or D. sechellia. Our results indicate that neither D. mauritiana autosome (2 or 3) can cause complete female sterility in a D. simulans background. The simultaneous presence of homozygous regions from both the second and third chromosomes of D. mauritiana, however, causes nearly complete female sterility which cannot be accounted for by their individual effects. The two autosomes of D. sechellia may show a similar pattern. From the same crosses, we also obtained evidence against a role for cytoplasmic or maternal effects in causing hybrid male sterility between these species. Taken with the results presented elsewhere, these observations suggest that epistatic interactions between conspecific genes in a hybrid background may be the prevalent mode of hybrid sterility between recently diverged species.     

Spatial organization of chromosomes in the salivary gland nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster

Using a computer-based system for model building and analysis, three-dimensional models of 24 Drosophila melanogaster salivary gland nuclei have been constructed from optically or physically sectioned glands, allowing several generalizations about chromosome folding and packaging in these nuclei. First and most surprising, the prominent coiling of the chromosomes is strongly chiral, with right-handed gyres predominating. Second, high frequency appositions between certain loci and the nuclear envelope appear almost exclusively at positions of intercalary heterochromatin; in addition, the chromocenter is always apposed to the envelope. Third, chromosomes are invariably separated into mutually exclusive spatial domains while usually extending across the nucleus in a polarized (Rabl) orientation. Fourth, the arms of each autosome are almost always juxtaposed, but no other relative arm positions are strongly favored. Finally, despite these nonrandom structural features, each chromosome is found to fold into a wide variety of different configurations. In addition, a set of nuclei has been analyzed in which the normally aggregrated centromeric regions of the chromosomes are located far apart from one another. These nuclei have the same architectural motifs seen in normal nuclei. This implies that such characteristics as separate chromosome domains and specific chromosome-nuclear envelope contacts are largely independent of the relative placement of the different chromosomes within the nucleus.