Aquaporin-2 in the ��-omics�� Era

Vasopressin controls renal water excretion largely through actions to regulate the water channel aquaporin-2 in collecting duct principal cells. Our knowledge of the mechanisms involved has increased markedly in recent years with the advent of methods for large-scale systems-level profiling such as protein mass spectrometry, yeast two-hybrid analysis, and oligonucleotide microarrays. Here we review this progress.Regulation of water excretion by the kidney is one of the most visible aspects of everyday physiology. An outdoor tennis game on a hot summer day can result in substantial water losses by sweating, and the kidneys respond by reducing water excretion. In contrast, excessive intake of water, a frequent occurrence in everyday life, results in excretion of copious amounts of clear urine. These responses serve to exact tight control on the tonicity of body fluids, maintaining serum osmolality in the range of 290–294 mosmol/kg of H₂O through the regulated return of water from the pro-urine in the renal collecting ducts to the bloodstream.The importance of this process is highlighted when the regulation fails. For example, polyuria (rapid uncontrolled excretion of water) is a sometimes devastating consequence of lithium therapy for bipolar disorder. On the other side of the coin are water balance disorders that result from excessive renal water retention causing systemic hypo-osmolality or hyponatremia. Hyponatremia due to excessive water retention can be seen with severe congestive heart failure, hepatic cirrhosis, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis.The chief regulator of water excretion is the peptide hormone AVP,² whereas the chief molecular target for regulation is the water channel AQP2. In this minireview, we describe new progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in regulation of AQP2 by AVP in collecting duct cells, with emphasis on new information derived from “systems-level” approaches involving large-scale profiling and screening techniques such as oligonucleotide arrays, protein mass spectrometry, and yeast two-hybrid analysis. Most of the progress with these techniques is in the identification of individual molecules involved in AVP signaling and binding interactions with AQP2. Additional related issues are addressed in several recent reviews (1–4).     

Pen2 and Presenilin-1 Modulate the Dynamic Equilibrium of Presenilin-1 and Presenilin-2 ��-Secretase Complexes

γ-Secretase is known to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease through production of amyloidogenic Aβ42 peptides. Early onset familial Alzheimer disease mutations in presenilin (PS), the catalytic core of γ-secretase, invariably increase the Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio. However, the mechanism by which these mutations affect γ-secretase complex formation and cleavage specificity is poorly understood. We show that our in vitro assay system recapitulates the effect of PS1 mutations on the Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio observed in cell and animal models. We have developed a series of small molecule affinity probes that allow us to characterize active γ-secretase complexes. Furthermore we reveal that the equilibrium of PS1- and PS2-containing active complexes is dynamic and altered by overexpression of Pen2 or PS1 mutants and that formation of PS2 complexes is positively correlated with increased Aβ42:Aβ40 ratios. These data suggest that perturbations to γ-secretase complex equilibrium can have a profound effect on enzyme activity and that increased PS2 complexes along with mutated PS1 complexes contribute to an increased Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio.β-Amyloid (Aβ)⁵ peptides are believed to play a causative role in Alzheimer disease (AD). Aβ peptides are generated from the processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by two proteases, β-secretase and γ-secretase. Although γ-secretase generates heterogenous Aβ peptides ranging from 37 to 46 amino acids in length, significant work has focused mainly on the Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptides that are the major constituents of amyloid plaques. γ-Secretase is a multisubunit membrane aspartyl protease comprised of at least four known subunits: presenilin (PS), nicastrin (Nct), anterior pharynx-defective (Aph), and presenilin enhancer 2 (Pen2). Presenilin is thought to contain the catalytic core of the complex (1–4), whereas Aph and Nct play critical roles in the assembly, trafficking, and stability of γ-secretase as well as substrate recognition (5, 6). Lastly Pen2 facilitates the endoproteolysis of PS into its N-terminal (NTF) and C-terminal (CTF) fragments thereby yielding a catalytically competent enzyme (5, 7–10). All four proteins (PS, Nct, Aph1, and Pen2) are obligatory for γ-secretase activity in cell and animal models (11, 12). There are two homologs of PS, PS1 and PS2, and three isoforms of Aph1, Aph1aS, Aph1aL, and Aph1b. At least six active γ-secretase complexes have been reported (two presenilins × three Aph1s) (13, 14). The sum of apparent molecular masses of the four proteins (PS1-NTF/CTF ≈ 53 kDa, Nct ≈ 120 kDa, Aph1 ≈ 30 kDa, and Pen2 ≈ 10kDa) is ∼200 kDa. However, active γ-secretase complexes of varying sizes, ranging from 250 to 2000 kDa, have been reported (15–19). Recently a study suggested that the γ-secretase complex contains only one of each subunit (20). Collectively these studies suggest that a four-protein complex around 200–250 kDa may be the minimal functional γ-secretase unit with additional cofactors and/or varying stoichiometry of subunits existing in the high molecular weight γ-secretase complexes. CD147 and TMP21 have been found to be associated with the γ-secretase complex (21, 22); however, their role in the regulation of γ-secretase has been controversial (23, 24).Mutations of PS1 or PS2 are associated with familial early onset AD (FAD), although it is debatable whether these familial PS mutations act as “gain or loss of function” alterations in regard to γ-secretase activity (25–27). Regardless the overall outcome of these mutations is an increased ratio of Aβ42:Aβ40. Clearly these mutations differentially affect γ-secretase activity for the production of Aβ40 and Aβ42. Despite intensive studies of Aβ peptides and γ-secretase, the molecular mechanism controlling the specificity of γ-secretase activity for Aβ40 and Aβ42 production has not been resolved. It has been found that PS1 mutations affect the formation of γ-secretase complexes (28). However, the precise mechanism by which individual subunits alter the dynamics of γ-secretase complex formation and activity is largely unresolved. A better mechanistic understanding of γ-secretase activity associated with FAD mutations has been hindered by the lack of suitable assays and probes that are necessary to recapitulate the effect of these mutations seen in cell models and to characterize the active γ-secretase complex.In our present studies, we have determined the overall effect of Pen2 and PS1 expression on the dynamics of PS1- and PS2-containing complexes and their association with γ-secretase activity. Using newly developed biotinylated small molecular probes and activity assays, we revealed that expression of Pen2 or PS1 FAD mutants markedly shifts the equilibrium of PS1-containing active complexes to that of PS2-containing complexes and results in an overall increase in the Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio in both stable cell lines and animal models. Our studies indicate that perturbations to the equilibrium of active γ-secretase complexes by an individual subunit can greatly affect the activity of the enzyme. Moreover they serve as further evidence that there are multiple and distinct γ-secretase complexes that can exist within the same cells and that their equilibrium is dynamic. Additionally the affinity probes developed here will facilitate further study of the expression and composition of endogenous active γ-secretase from a variety of model systems.     

ULK1��ATG13��FIP200 Complex Mediates mTOR Signaling and Is Essential for Autophagy

Autophagy is a degradative process that recycles long-lived and faulty cellular components. It is linked to many diseases and is required for normal development. ULK1, a mammalian serine/threonine protein kinase, plays a key role in the initial stages of autophagy, though the exact molecular mechanism is unknown. Here we report identification of a novel protein complex containing ULK1 and two additional protein factors, FIP200 and ATG13, all of which are essential for starvation-induced autophagy. Both FIP200 and ATG13 are critical for correct localization of ULK1 to the pre-autophagosome and stability of ULK1 protein. Additionally, we demonstrate by using both cellular experiments and a de novo in vitro reconstituted reaction that FIP200 and ATG13 can enhance ULK1 kinase activity individually but both are required for maximal stimulation. Further, we show that ATG13 and ULK1 are phosphorylated by the mTOR pathway in a nutrient starvation-regulated manner, indicating that the ULK1·ATG13·FIP200 complex acts as a node for integrating incoming autophagy signals into autophagosome biogenesis.Macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is a catabolic process whereby long-lived proteins and damaged organelles are shuttled to lysosomes for degradation. This process is conserved in all eukaryotes. Under normal growth conditions a housekeeping level of autophagy exists. Under stress, such as nutrient starvation, autophagy is strongly induced resulting in the engulfment of cytosolic components and organelles in specialized double-membrane structures termed autophagosomes. Following fusion of the outer autophagosomal membrane with lysosomes, the inner membrane and its cytoplasmic cargo are degraded and recycled (1–3). Recent work has implicated autophagy in many disease pathologies, including cancer, neurodegeneration, as well as in eliminating intracellular pathogens (4–8).The morphology of autophagy was first described in mammalian cells over 50 years ago (9). However, it is only recently through yeast genetic screens, that multiple autophagy-related (ATG) genes have been identified (10–12). The yeast ATG proteins have been classified into four major groups: the Atg1 protein kinase complex, the Vps34 phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate kinase complex, the Atg8/Atg12 conjugation systems, and the Atg9 recycling complex (13). Even though many ATG genes are now known, most of which have functional homologs in mammalian cells (14, 15), the molecular mechanism by which they sense the initial triggers and subsequently dictate autophagy-specific intracellular membrane events is far from understood.In yeast, one of the earliest autophagy-specific events is believed to involve the Atg1 protein kinase complex. Atg1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase and a key autophagy-regulator (16). Atg1 is complexed to at least two other proteins during autophagy, Atg13 and Atg17, both of which are required for normal Atg1 function and autophagosome generation (17–19). Classical signaling pathways such as the cAMP-dependent kinase (PKA) pathway or the Tor kinase pathway appear to converge upon this complex, placing Atg1 at an early stage during autophagosome biogenesis (20–22). Atg1 phosphorylation by PKA blocks its association with the forming autophagosome (21), while the Tor pathway hyperphosphorylates Atg13 causing a reduced affinity of Atg13 for Atg1, resulting in repression of autophagy (17, 19). In contrast, nutrient starvation or inhibition of Tor leads to dephosphorylation of Atg13 thus increased Atg1 complex formation and kinase activity, resulting in stimulation of autophagy (19). Surprisingly, the physiological substrates of Atg1 kinase have not been identified; thus how Atg1 transduces upstream autophagic signaling is undefined. Recently, mammalian homologs of Atg1 have been identified as ULK1 and ULK2 (Unc-51-like kinase)² (23–25). ULK1 and ULK2 are ubiquitously expressed and localize to the isolation membrane, or forming autophagosome, upon nutrient starvation (25); RNAi-mediated depletion of ULK1 in HEK293 cells compromises autophagy (23, 24). The exact role of ULK1 versus ULK2 in autophagy is unclear, and it is possible some redundancy exists between the two isoforms (26).Given the conservation of autophagy from yeast to man, it is interesting to note that no mammalian counterpart to yeast Atg13 or Atg17 had been identified until very recently. The protein FIP200 (focal adhesion kinase family-interacting protein of 200 kDa) was identified as an autophagy-essential binding partner of both ULK1 and ULK2 (25), and it has been speculated that FIP200 might be the equivalent of yeast Atg17, despite low sequence similarity (25, 27).In this study, we delve deeper into the molecular regulation of ULK1 to gain a better insight into how mammalian signaling pathways affect autophagy initiation. We describe here the identification of a triple complex consisting of ULK1, FIP200, and the mammalian equivalent of Atg13. This complex is required not only for localization of ULK1 to the isolation membrane but also for maximal kinase activity. In addition, both ATG13 and ULK1 are kinase substrates in the mTOR pathway and thus might function to sense nutrient starvation. Therefore, this study defines the role of mammalian ULK1-ATG13-FIP200 complex in mediating the initial autophagic triggers and to transduce the signal to the core autophagic machinery.     

Rab2 Utilizes Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase and Protein Kinase C�� to Associate with Microtubules and to Recruit Dynein

Rab2 requires glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and atypical protein kinase Cι (aPKCι) for retrograde vesicle formation from vesicular tubular clusters that sort secretory cargo from recycling proteins returned to the endoplasmic reticulum. However, the precise role of GAPDH and aPKCι in the early secretory pathway is unclear. GAPDH was the first glycolytic enzyme reported to co-purify with microtubules (MTs). Similarly, aPKC associates directly with MTs. To learn whether Rab2 also binds directly to MTs, a MT binding assay was performed. Purified Rab2 was found in a MT-enriched pellet only when both GAPDH and aPKCι were present, and Rab2-MT binding could be prevented by a recombinant fragment made to the Rab2 amino terminus (residues 2-70), which directly interacts with GAPDH and aPKCι. Because GAPDH binds to the carboxyl terminus of α-tubulin, we characterized the distribution of tyrosinated/detyrosinated α-tubulin that is recruited by Rab2 in a quantitative membrane binding assay. Rab2-treated membranes contained predominantly tyrosinated α-tubulin; however, aPKCι was the limiting and essential factor. Tyrosination/detyrosination influences MT motor protein binding; therefore, we determined whether Rab2 stimulated kinesin or dynein membrane binding. Although kinesin was not detected on membranes incubated with Rab2, dynein was recruited in a dose-dependent manner, and binding was aPKCι-dependent. These combined results suggest a mechanism by which Rab2 controls MT and motor recruitment to vesicular tubular clusters.The small GTPase Rab2 is essential for membrane trafficking in the early secretory pathway and associates with vesicular tubular clusters (VTCs)² located between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the cis-Golgi compartment (1, 2). VTCs are pleomorphic structures that sort anterograde-directed cargo from recycling proteins and trafficking machinery retrieved to the ER (3-6). Rab2 bound to a VTC microdomain stimulates recruitment of soluble factors that results in the release of vesicles containing the recycling protein p53/p58 (7). In that regard, we have previously reported that glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and atypical PKC ι (aPKCι) are Rab2 effectors that interact directly with the Rab2 amino terminus and with each other (8, 9). Their interaction requires Src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of GAPDH and aPKCι (10). Moreover, GAPDH is a substrate for aPKCι (11). GAPDH catalytic activity is not required for ER to Golgi transport indicating that GAPDH provides a specific function essential for membrane trafficking from VTCs independent of glycolytic function (9). Indeed, phospho-GAPDH influences MT dynamics in the early secretory pathway (11).GAPDH was the first glycolytic enzyme reported to co-purify with microtubules (MTs) (12) and subsequently was shown to interact with the carboxyl terminus of α-tubulin (13). The binding of GAPDH to MTs promotes formation of cross-linked parallel MT arrays or bundles (14, 15). GAPDH has also been reported to possess membrane fusogenic activity, which is inhibited by tubulin (16). Similarly, aPKC associates directly with tubulin and promotes MT stability and MT remodeling at specific intracellular sites (17-21). It may not be coincidental that these two Rab2 effectors influence MT dynamics because recent studies indicate that the cytoskeleton plays a central role in the organization and operation of the secretory pathway (22).MTs are dynamic structures that grow or shrink by the addition or loss of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers from the ends of protofilaments (23). Their assembly and stability is regulated by a variety of proteins traditionally referred to as microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). In addition to the multiple α/β isoforms that are present in eukaryotes, MTs undergo an assortment of post-translational modifications, including acetylation, glycylation, glutamylation, phosphorylation, palmitoylation, and detyrosination, which further contribute to their biochemical heterogeneity (24, 25). It has been proposed that these tubulin modifications regulate intracellular events by facilitating interaction with MAPs and with other specific effector proteins (24). For example, the reversible addition of tyrosine to the carboxyl terminus of α-tubulin regulates MT interaction with plus-end tracking proteins (+TIPs) containing the cytoskeleton-associated protein glycine-rich (CAP-Gly) motif and with dynein-dynactin (27-29). Additionally, MT motility and cargo transport rely on the cooperation of the motor proteins kinesin and dynein (30). Kinesin is a plus-end directed MT motor, whereas cytoplasmic dynein is a minus-end MT-based motor, and therefore the motors transport vesicular cargo toward the opposite end of a MT track (31).Although MT assembly does not appear to be directly regulated by small GTPases, Rab proteins provide a molecular link for vesicle movement along MTs to the appropriate target (22, 32-34). In this study, the potential interaction of Rab2 with MTs and motor proteins was characterized. We found that Rab2 does not bind directly to preassembled MTs but does associate when both GAPDH and aPKCι are present and bound to MTs. Moreover, the MTs predominantly contained tyrosinated α-tubulin (Tyr-tubulin) suggesting that a dynamic pool of MTs that differentially binds MAPs/effector proteins/motors associates with VTCs in response to Rab2. To that end, we determined that Rab2-promoted dynein/dynactin binding to membranes and that the recruitment required aPKCι.     

Kindlin-1 and -2 Directly Bind the C-terminal Region of �� Integrin Cytoplasmic Tails and Exert Integrin-specific Activation Effects

Integrin activation, the rapid conversion of integrin adhesion receptors from low to high affinity, occurs in response to intracellular signals that act on the short cytoplasmic tails of integrin β subunits. Talin binding to integrin β tails provides one key activation signal, but additional factors are likely to cooperate with talin to regulate integrin activation. The integrin β tail-binding proteins kindlin-2 and kindlin-3 were recently identified as integrin co-activators. Here we report an analysis of kindlin-1 and kindlin-2 interactions with β1 and β3 integrin tails and describe the effect of kindlin expression on integrin activation. We demonstrate a direct interaction of kindlin-1 and -2 with recombinant integrin β tails in pulldown binding assays. Our mutational analysis shows that the second conserved NXXY motif (Tyr⁷⁹⁵), a preceding threonine-containing region (Thr⁷⁸⁸ and Thr⁷⁸⁹) of the integrin β1A tail, and a conserved tryptophan in the F3 subdomain of the kindlin FERM domain (kindlin-1 Trp⁶¹² and kindlin-2 Trp⁶¹⁵) are required for direct kindlin-integrin interactions. Similar interactions were observed for integrin β3 tails. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting we further show that transient expression of kindlin-1 or -2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells inhibits the activation of endogenous α5β1 or stably expressed αIIbβ3 integrins. This inhibition is not dependent on direct kindlin-integrin interactions because mutant kindlins exhibiting impaired integrin binding activity effectively inhibit integrin activation. Consistent with previous reports, we find that when co-expressed with the talin head, kindlin-1 or -2 can activate αIIbβ3. This effect is dependent on an intact integrin-binding site in kindlin. Notably however, even when co-expressed with activating levels of talin head, neither kindlin-1 or -2 can cooperate with talin to activate β1 integrins; instead they strongly inhibit talin-mediated activation. We suggest that kindlins are adaptor proteins that regulate integrin activation, that kindlin expression levels determine their effects, and that kindlins may exert integrin-specific effects.Integrins are a family of αβ heterodimeric transmembrane receptors that mediate cell adhesion to extracellular matrix, cell surface, or soluble protein ligands and modulate a variety of intracellular signaling cascades. A key feature of integrins is their ability to dynamically regulate their affinity for extracellular ligands. In a tightly regulated process generally termed integrin activation, intracellular signals that impinge upon the β subunit cytoplasmic tail induce conformational rearrangements in the integrin extracellular domains, increasing the binding affinity for extracellular ligands (1-3). Ligand-bound integrins then recruit additional signaling, adaptor, and cytoskeletal proteins to the integrin cytoplasmic domains, providing mechanical connections to the actin cytoskeleton and a link to a variety of signal transduction pathways (2-8).Recent years have seen significant advances in our understanding of integrin activation. Notable among these is the identification of the actin- and integrin-binding protein talin as a key integrin activator (1, 9). The 50-kDa talin head contains the principal integrin-binding site, and expression of the talin head is sufficient to activate β1 and β3 integrins (10, 11). The talin head contains a FERM (four point one ezrin radixin moesin) domain. FERM domains consist of trefoil arrangement of three subdomains (F1, F2, and F3). The phosphotyrosine-binding domain-like F3 subdomain of the talin FERM directly binds a conserved NP(I/L)Y motif in integrin β tails, and this interaction is necessary for integrin activation in vitro and in vivo (10, 12-19). However, although abundant evidence supports the importance of talin binding to integrin β tails during integrin activation, differences in sensitivity of integrins to talin activation and submaximal activation by overexpressed talin suggested that other activating factors may cooperate with talin (10, 20). In an attempt to identify and characterize potential co-activators, we investigated the kindlin family of FERM domain-containing proteins.Kindlin family proteins (21) were first characterized in nematodes where the sole Caenorhabditis elegans kindlin, UNC-112, was identified in an embryonic screen for defective motility and shown to be essential for the assembly of proper cell-matrix adhesion structures, where it normally co-localized with β integrin (22-24). UNC-112 is conserved across many species, because the nematode, fly, and human homologs are ∼60% similar (∼41% identical) over their entire length (24). Humans express three known homologs of UNC-112: kindlin-1 (Kindlerin, URP1, and FERMT1), kindlin-2 (Mig2 and mig-2), and kindlin-3 (Mig2B and URP2) (25-27). Kindlin-1 and -2 are most closely related, sharing 60% identity and 74% similarity, whereas kindlin-3 shares 53% identity and 69% similarity to kindlin-1 and 49% identity and 67% similarity to kindlin-2 (28). The kindlin proteins all contain a predicted Pleckstrin homology domain and a FERM domain that is most closely related to the talin FERM domain, particularly within the integrin-binding F3 subdomain (29). Based on this sequence similarity we proposed that kindlin FERM domains may directly bind integrin β tails, and we previously showed that kindlin-1 could be pulled down from cell lysates using recombinant integrin β1 and β3 tails and that kindlin-1 co-localized with integrins in focal adhesions (29). A similar localization was reported for kindlin-2 (26, 30), and recent reports provided clear evidence implicating kindlin-2 and kindlin-3 in regulation of integrin activation (31-33). Here, we have used integrin pulldown assays to demonstrate direct binding of full-length kindlin-1 to the cytoplasmic tails of β1A and β3 integrins and to identify key binding residues within the integrin tails and the kindlin F3 subdomain. We confirm that these interactions are important for recruiting kindlin-1 to focal adhesions and show that, contrary to expectations, overexpressed kindlin-1 or -2 inhibit β1 and β3 integrin activation. Overexpressed kindlin-1 or -2 can, however, cooperate with expressed talin head to activate β3 but not β1 integrins. We therefore provide the first data suggesting that kindlin-1 and -2 effects on integrin activation may show β subunit specificity.     

Spermine Synthase Deficiency Leads to Deafness and a Profound Sensitivity to ��-Difluoromethylornithine

Male gyro (Gy) mice, which have an X chromosomal deletion inactivating the SpmS and Phex genes, were found to be profoundly hearing impaired. This defect was due to alteration in polyamine content due to the absence of spermine synthase, the product of the SpmS gene. It was reversed by breeding the Gy strain with CAG/SpmS mice, a transgenic line that ubiquitously expresses spermine synthase under the control of a composite cytomegalovirus-IE enhancer/chicken β-actin promoter. There was an almost complete loss of the endocochlear potential in the Gy mice, which parallels the hearing deficiency, and this was also reversed by the production of spermine from the spermine synthase transgene. Gy mice showed a striking toxic response to treatment with the ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO). Within 2–3 days of exposure to DFMO in the drinking water, the Gy mice suffered a catastrophic loss of motor function resulting in death within 5 days. This effect was due to an inability to maintain normal balance and was also prevented by the transgenic expression of spermine synthase. DFMO treatment of control mice or Gy-CAG/SpmS had no effect on balance. The loss of balance in Gy mice treated with DFMO was due to inhibition of polyamine synthesis because it was prevented by administration of putrescine. Our results are consistent with a critical role for polyamines in regulation of Kir channels that maintain the endocochlear potential and emphasize the importance of normal spermidine:spermine ratio in the hearing and balance functions of the inner ear.Polyamines are essential for viability in mammals. Knockouts of the genes for ornithine decarboxylase and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, which are enzymes needed for the synthesis of putrescine, spermidine, and spermine, are lethal at early stages of embryonic development (1, 2). There is convincing evidence that the formation of hypusine in eIF5A, which requires spermidine as a precursor, is essential for eukaryotes (3). However, the function(s) of spermine is not so well established. Yeast mutants with inactivated spermine synthase grow at a normal rate (4). Mammalian cells in culture also grow normally in the presence of inhibitors of spermine synthase (5) or after inactivation of the spermine synthase gene (SpmS) (6–8). Inactivation of both of the genes that were originally described as encoding spermine synthases in plants leads to profound developmental defects (9–11), but recently it was discovered that one of these genes actually encodes a thermospermine synthase, and it appears that the lack of thermospermine may be responsible for these defects (12).In contrast, spermine is clearly required for normal development in mammals. The rare human Snyder-Robinson syndrome is caused by mutations in SpmS located in the X chromosome that drastically reduces the amount of spermine synthase (13, 14). This leads to mental retardation, hypotonia, cerebellar circuitry dysfunction, facial asymmetry, thin habitus, osteoporosis, and kyphoscoliosis. Male mice, which have an X chromosomal deletion that includes SpmS and have no detectable spermine synthase activity, do survive but are only viable on the B6C3H background (15–17). This mouse strain having an X-linked dominant mutation was isolated from a female offspring of an irradiated mouse and was termed gyro (Gy)² based on a circling behavior pattern in affected males (18). Subsequent studies have shown that the Gy mice have a deletion of part of the X chromosome that inactivates both Phex, a gene that regulates phosphate metabolism, and SpmS (16, 19). The lack of SpmS causes a total absence of spermine (6, 7, 15, 16). Such Gy mice suffer from hypophosphatemia, have a greatly reduced size, sterility, and neurological abnormalities, and have a short life span (6, 16, 18). All of these changes except the hypophosphatemia are reversed when spermine synthase activity is restored (20).The original characterization of Gy mice also reported preliminary indications that these mice had hearing defects lacking the Preyer reflex (21, 22). This is of particular interest in the context of polyamine metabolism because a drug, α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO, Eflornithine), that targets ornithine decarboxylase has been shown to cause occasional hearing loss in some patients (23–26). Although DFMO was ineffective for cancer treatment, it is an extremely promising agent for cancer chemoprevention (27, 28). When combined with sulindac, DFMO treatment produced a substantial reduction in the recurrence of colorectal adenomas in a large clinical trial (27). DFMO is a major drug for the treatment of African sleeping sickness caused by Trypanosoma brucei (29, 30). It is also used as a topically applied cream for treatment of unwanted facial hair in women (31, 32). DFMO is generally well tolerated even at high doses, but reversible hearing loss has been reported in multiple clinical trials (25, 33), and a rarer irreversible defect has also been reported (34). These side effects are not observed at lower doses of DFMO (26, 27).Ototoxicity has been demonstrated to occur in experimental animals treated with DFMO including rats (35), guinea pigs (36), gerbils (37), and mice (38). Using immunohistochemistry, a high level of ornithine decarboxylase was observed in the inner ear of the rat, with the highest in the organ of Corti and lateral wall followed by the cochlear nerve (39). Measurements of polyamines in the relevant structures are very difficult due to the small amount of tissue available, but as expected, DFMO treatment reduced polyamine levels and ornithine decarboxylase activity in the inner ear of the guinea pig (36). A plausible explanation for the importance of polyamines in auditory physiology is based on their well documented role as regulators of potassium channels (38). The inward rectification of Kir channels is caused by blockage of the outward current by polyamines (40–42). Studies of the cloned mouse cochlear lateral wall-specific Kir4.1 channel showed that inward rectification was reduced and that there was a marked reduction in endocochlear potential (EP). It was proposed that DFMO treatment increases the outward Kir4.1 current, resulting in a drop in EP (38).In the experiments reported here, we have studied in more detail the role of polyamines in auditory physiology using Gy mice and crosses of these mice with transgenic CAG/SpmS mice (43). These mice express spermine synthase under the control of a composite cytomegalovirus-IE enhancer/chicken β-actin promoter, which was designed to provide ubiquitous expression (44–46). Assays of the spermine synthase activity in CAG/SpmS line 8 confirmed that there was a high level of expression of the transgene in many different organs and that this level was maintained for at least 1 year (43). Our studies confirm that Gy mice are totally deaf and that this condition is reversed by the expression of the SpmS gene. These changes are due to a virtually complete loss of the EP in the Gy mice. We have also examined the effect of DFMO on the Gy mice. Unexpectedly, it was found that these mice show a rapid and profound toxicity to this drug, leading to death within a few days. Within 5 days of exposure to DFMO in the drinking water, the DFMO-treated mice suffered a catastrophic loss of balance due to inner ear effects. This toxicity was also prevented by the transgenic expression of spermine synthase in the Gy background.     

SDF2L1, a Component of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Complex, Differentially Interacts with ��-, ��-, and ��-Defensin Propeptides

Mammalian defensins are cationic antimicrobial peptides that play a central role in host innate immunity and as regulators of acquired immunity. In animals, three structural defensin subfamilies, designated as α, β, and θ, have been characterized, each possessing a distinctive tridisulfide motif. Mature α- and β-defensins are produced by simple proteolytic processing of their prepropeptide precursors. In contrast, the macrocyclic θ-defensins are formed by the head-to-tail splicing of nonapeptides excised from a pair of prepropeptide precursors. Thus, elucidation of the θ-defensin biosynthetic pathway provides an opportunity to identify novel factors involved in this unique process. We incorporated the θ-defensin precursor, proRTD1a, into a bait construct for a yeast two-hybrid screen that identified rhesus macaque stromal cell-derived factor 2-like protein 1 (SDF2L1), as an interactor. SDF2L1 is a component of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone complex, which we found to also interact with α- and β-defensins. However, analysis of the SDF2L1 domain requirements for binding of representative α-, β-, and θ-defensins revealed that α- and β-defensins bind SDF2L1 similarly, but differently from the interactions that mediate binding of SDF2L1 to pro-θ-defensins. Thus, SDF2L1 is a factor involved in processing and/or sorting of all three defensin subfamilies.Mammalian defensins are tridisulfide-containing antimicrobial peptides that contribute to innate immunity in all species studied to date. Defensins are comprised of three structural subfamilies: the α-, β-, and θ-defensins (1). α- and β-Defensins are peptides of about 29–45-amino acid residues with similar three-dimensional structures. Despite their similar tertiary conformations, the disulfide motifs of α- and β-defensins differ. Expression of human α-defensins is tissue-specific. Four myeloid α-defensins (HNP1–4) are expressed predominantly by neutrophils and monocytes wherein they are packaged in granules, while two enteric α-defensins (HD-5 and HD-6) are expressed at high levels in Paneth cells of the small intestine. Myeloid α-defensins constitute about 5% of the protein mass of human neutrophils. HNPs are discharged into the phagosome during phagocytic ingestion of microbial particles. HD-5 and HD-6 are produced and stored as propeptides in Paneth cell granules and are processed extracellularly by intestinal trypsin (2). β-Defensins are produced primarily by various epithelia (e.g. skin, urogenital tract, airway) and are secreted by the producing cells in their mature forms. In contrast to pro-α-defensins, which contain a conserved prosegment of ∼40 amino acids, the prosegments in β-defensins vary in length and sequence. θ-Defensins are found only in Old World monkeys and orangutans and are the only known circular peptides in animals. These 18-residue macrocyclic peptides are formed by ligation of two nonamer sequences excised from two precursor polypeptides, which are truncated versions of ancestral α-defensins. Like myeloid α-defensins, θ-defensins are stored primarily in neutrophil and monocyte granules (3).Numerous laboratories have demonstrated that the antimicrobial properties of defensins derive from their ability to bind and disrupt target cell membranes (4), and studies have shown defensins to be active against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria (5), viruses (6–9), fungi (10, 11), and parasites such as Giardia lamblia (12). Defensins also play a regulatory role in acquired immunity as they are known to chemoattract T lymphocytes, monocytes, and immature dendritic cells (13, 14), act as adjuvants, stimulate B cell responses, and up-regulate proliferation and cytokine production by spleen cells and T helper cells (15, 16).Defensins are produced as pre-propeptides and undergo post-translational processing to form the mature peptides. While much has been learned about regulation of defensin expression, little is known about the factors involved in their biosynthesis. Valore and Ganz (17) investigated the processing of defensins in cultured cells and demonstrated that maturation of HNPs occurs through two proteolytic steps that lead to formation of mature α-defensins, but the proteases involved have yet to be identified. Moreover, there are virtually no published data regarding endoplasmic reticulum (ER)² factors that are responsible for the folding, processing, and sorting steps necessary for defensin maturation and secretion or trafficking to the proper subcellular compartment. It is likely that several chaperones, proteases, and protein-disulfide isomerase (PDI) family proteins are involved. Consistent with this possibility, Gruber et al. (18) recently demonstrated the role of a PDI in biosynthesis of cyclotides, small ∼30-residue macrocyclic peptides produced by plants.The primary structures of α- and θ-defensin precursors are closely related. We therefore undertook studies to identify proteins that interact with representative propeptides of each defensin subfamily with the goal of determining common and unique processes that regulate biosynthesis of α- and θ-defensins. We used two-hybrid analysis to first identify interactors of the θ-defensin precursor, proRTD1a. As described, we identified SDF2L1, a component of the ER-chaperone complex as an interactor, and showed that it also specifically interacts with α- and β-defensins. This suggests that SDF2L1 is involved in the maturation/trafficking of defensins at a step common to all three subfamilies of mammalian defensins.