Replication of Epstein–Barr Viral DNA

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a paradigm for human tumor viruses: it is the first virus recognized to cause cancer in people; it causes both lymphomas and carcinomas; yet these tumors arise infrequently given that most people in the world are infected with the virus. EBV is maintained extrachromosomally in infected normal and tumor cells. Eighty-four percent of these viral plasmids replicate each S phase, are licensed, require a single viral protein for their synthesis, and can use two functionally distinct origins of DNA replication, oriP, and Raji ori. Eighty-eight percent of newly synthesized plasmids are segregated faithfully to the daughter cells. Infectious viral particles are not synthesized under these conditions of latent infection. This plasmid replication is consistent with survival of EBV’s host cells. Rare cells in an infected population either spontaneously or following exogenous induction support EBV’s lytic cycle, which is lethal for the cell. In this case, the viral DNA replicates 100-fold or more, uses a third kind of viral origin of DNA replication, oriLyt, and many viral proteins. Here we shall describe the three modes of EBV’s replication as a function of the viral origins used and the viral and cellular proteins that mediate the DNA synthesis from these origins focusing, where practical, on recent advances in our understanding.     

Human DNA Polymerase η Is Required for Common Fragile Site Stability during Unperturbed DNA Replication

Human DNA polymerase η (Pol η) modulates susceptibility to skin cancer by promoting translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) past sunlight-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. Despite its well-established role in TLS synthesis, the role of Pol η in maintaining genome stability in the absence of external DNA damage has not been well explored. We show here that short hairpin RNA-mediated depletion of Pol η from undamaged human cells affects cell cycle progression and the rate of cell proliferation and results in increased spontaneous chromosome breaks and common fragile site expression with the activation of ATM-mediated DNA damage checkpoint signaling. These phenotypes were also observed in association with modified replication factory dynamics during S phase. In contrast to that seen in Pol η-depleted cells, none of these cellular or karyotypic defects were observed in cells depleted for Pol ι, the closest relative of Pol η. Our results identify a new role for Pol η in maintaining genomic stability during unperturbed S phase and challenge the idea that the sole functional role of Pol η in human cells is in TLS DNA damage tolerance and/or repair pathways following exogenous DNA damage.Mutations in the POLH gene that encodes DNA polymerase η (Pol η) are responsible for the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP-V). XP-V is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by extreme sensitivity to sunlight and a very high incidence of sunlight-induced skin cancer, as are the other forms of “classical” XP (17, 27). However, in contrast to the other nucleotide excision repair (NER)-defective XP complementation groups (XP-A to XP-G), XP-V cells have normal NER but cannot support translesion synthesis (TLS) past DNA-containing cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) (27). Purified Pol η, the TLS polymerase that is mutated in XP-V, is able to synthesize past this lesion with a high level of efficiency (28), and in a majority of cases it inserts the correct nucleotide, adenine, opposite the two thymines contained in the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer ring (26).The ability to replicate efficiently past UV pyrimidine dimers has been the principal—or sole—function assigned thus far to Pol η. In the absence of Pol η, cells display an increased rate of UV-induced mutagenesis and carcinogenesis (23) that may reflect inefficient or error-prone synthesis by another polymerase. In mouse cells, this back-up polymerase may be Pol ι (12). Despite its ability to replicate past cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, Pol η does not appear to be able to carry out TLS past the other major UV photoproduct, the pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone photoproduct [(6-4)PP] in vitro or in vivo. It can, however, replicate past a limited number of other types of DNA damage in vitro, albeit with a lower level of efficiency than past CPDs (21). Whether the bypass of these lesions is performed in vivo by Pol η is less clear. For example, XP-V cells are sensitive to cisplatin, suggesting that bypass of cisplatin lesions may depend on Pol η (1). Combined NER- and Pol η-mediated lesion bypass has also been suggested as the likely mechanism for repairing DNA interstrand cross-links formed by mitomycin C (46) and psoralen (32). In contrast, Pol η does not appear to play a role in replication past endogenous lesions such as 8-oxoguanine (3) or abasic sites (2).It has been difficult to visualize or identify sites of action of Pol η or any of the other TLS polymerases by immunofluorescence due to their low levels of expression. However, in cells that mildly overexpress Pol η, it has been possible to localize the polymerase to nuclear replication factories during S phase. This localization depends on several motifs located close to the C terminus of Pol η, including an NLS and a ubiquitin-binding zinc finger domain (7, 18). Localization of Pol η in replication factories may concentrate the polymerase near sites of replication to facilitate recruitment to carry out TLS. If cells cannot remove or synthesize through a lesion blocking the replication fork, then homology-dependent recombinational repair (HRR) may be used to restart the replication fork (11, 34). RAD51-mediated HRR has been shown to be important for the repair of DNA damage during replication in all organisms (20, 31, 42). Recent evidence has suggested that Pol η, in addition to its role in TLS, may participate in HRR. This has been suggested by analyses of gene conversion in chicken DT40 cells during immunoglobulin gene diversification (19), as well as by in vitro experiments showing that Pol η is capable of promoting extension of the invading strand in D-loop structures to facilitate RAD52-mediated second-end capture during recombination-mediated repair (29, 30). The functional importance of this observation is less clear. Recent evidence from yeast argues that the bulk of heteroduplex DNA strand extension during HRR is mediated by the preferential recruitment of a replicative DNA polymerase, Pol δ (25). Moreover, there is no obvious recombination deficit in XP-V patients or in XP-V cells beyond a modest elevation in the frequency of UV-induced sister chromatid exchanges (10).In order to better understand the functional roles and importance of Pol η in human cells, we used short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to selectively deplete Pol η from cells and then determined how the loss of Pol η affected cell cycle progression, DNA replication dynamics, and cell proliferation in otherwise unperturbed cells. These experiments revealed an unexpected role for Pol η in maintaining chromosomal stability and preventing common fragile site (CFS) breakage during unperturbed S phase. Our results thus broaden the functional role of Pol η in human cells to include the maintenance of genomic stability during unperturbed DNA replication in S phase.     

Holding on through DNA Replication: Histone Modification or Modifier?

Histone methylation is widely believed to contribute to epigenetic inheritance by persevering through DNA replication and subsequently templating methylation of daughter chromosome regions. However, a report in this issue (Petruk et?al.) suggests that chromatin association of the methytransferase complexes themselves persists through replication and re-establishes histone methylation.     

3'' -> 5'' Exonucleases of DNA Polymerases ε and δ Correct Base Analog Induced DNA Replication Errors on opposite DNA Strands in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

The base analog 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine (HAP) induces bidirectional GC -> AT and AT -> GC transitions that are enhanced in DNA polymerase ε and δ 3' -> 5' exonuclease-deficient yeast mutants, pol2-4 and pol3-01, respectively. We have constructed a set of isogenic strains to determine whether the DNA polymerases δ and ε contribute equally to proofreading of replication errors provoked by HAP during leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis. Site-specific GC -> AT and AT -> GC transitions in a Pol(+), pol2-4 or pol3-01 genetic background were scored as reversions of ura3 missense alleles. At each site, reversion was increased in only one proofreading-deficient mutant, either pol2-4 or pol3-01, depending on the DNA strand in which HAP incorporation presumably occurred. Measurement of the HAP-induced reversion frequency of the ura3 alleles placed into chromosome III near to the defined active replication origin ARS306 in two orientations indicated that DNA polymerases ε and δ correct HAP-induced DNA replication errors on opposite DNA strands.     

The Block of DNA Polymerase �� Strand Displacement Activity by an Abasic Site Can Be Rescued by the Concerted Action of DNA Polymerase �� and Flap Endonuclease 1

Abasic (AP) sites are very frequent and dangerous DNA lesions. Their ability to block the advancement of a replication fork has been always viewed as a consequence of their inhibitory effect on the DNA synthetic activity of replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols). Here we show that AP sites can also affect the strand displacement activity of the lagging strand DNA pol δ, thus preventing proper Okazaki fragment maturation. This block can be overcome through a polymerase switch, involving the combined physical and functional interaction of DNA pol β and Flap endonuclease 1. Our data identify a previously unnoticed deleterious effect of the AP site lesion on normal cell metabolism and suggest the existence of a novel repair pathway that might be important in preventing replication fork stalling.Loss of purine and pyrimidine bases is a significant source of DNA damage in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Abasic (apurinic and apyrimidinic) lesions occur spontaneously in DNA; in eukaryotes it has been estimated that about 10⁴ depurination and 10² depyrimidation events occur per genome per day. An equally important source of abasic DNA lesions results from the action of DNA glycosylases, such as uracil glycosylase, which excises uracil arising primarily from spontaneous deamination of cytosines (1). Although most AP sites are removed by the base excision repair (BER)⁵ pathway, a small fraction of lesions persists, and DNA with AP lesions presents a strong block to DNA synthesis by replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols) (2, 3). Several studies have been performed to address the effects of AP sites on the template DNA strand on the synthetic activity of a variety of DNA pols. The major replicative enzyme of eukaryotic cells, DNA pol δ, was shown to be able to bypass an AP lesion, but only in the presence of the auxiliary factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and at a very reduced catalytic efficiency if compared with an undamaged DNA template (4). On the other hand, the family X DNA pols β and λ were shown to bypass an AP site but in a very mutagenic way (5). Recent genetic evidence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells showed that DNA pol δ is the enzyme replicating the lagging strand (6). According to the current model for Okazaki fragment synthesis (7–9), the action of DNA pol δ is not only critical for the extension of the newly synthesized Okazaki fragment but also for the displacement of an RNA/DNA segment of about 30 nucleotides on the pre-existing downstream Okazaki fragment to create an intermediate Flap structure that is the target for the subsequent action of the Dna2 endonuclease and the Flap endonuclease 1 (Fen-1). This process has the advantage of removing the entire RNA/DNA hybrid fragment synthesized by the DNA pol α/primase, potentially containing nucleotide misincorporations caused by the lack of a proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA pol α/primase. This results in a more accurate copy synthesized by DNA pol δ. The intrinsic strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ, in conjunction with Fen-1, PCNA, and replication protein A (RP-A), has been also proposed to be essential for the S phase-specific long patch BER pathway (10, 11). Although it is clear that an AP site on the template strand is a strong block for DNA pol δ-dependent synthesis on single-stranded DNA, the functional consequences of such a lesion on the ability of DNA pol δ to carry on strand displacement synthesis have never been investigated so far. Given the high frequency of spontaneous hydrolysis and/or cytidine deamination events, any detrimental effect of an AP site on the strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ might have important consequences both for lagging strand DNA synthesis and for long patch BER. In this work, we addressed this issue by constructing a series of synthetic gapped DNA templates with a single AP site at different positions with respect to the downstream primer to be displaced by DNA pol δ (see Fig. 1A). We show that an AP site immediately upstream of a single- to double-strand DNA junction constitutes a strong block to the strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ, even in the presence of RP-A and PCNA. Such a block could be resolved only through a “polymerase switch” involving the concerted physical and functional interaction of DNA pol β and Fen-1. The closely related DNA pol λ could only partially substitute for DNA pol β. Based on our data, we propose that stalling of a replication fork by an AP site not only is a consequence of its ability to inhibit nucleotide incorporation by the replicative DNA pols but can also stem from its effects on strand displacement during Okazaki fragment maturation. In summary, our data suggest the existence of a novel repair pathway that might be important in preventing replication fork stalling and identify a previously unnoticed deleterious effect of the AP site lesion on normal cell metabolism.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.An abasic site immediately upstream of a double-stranded DNA region inhibits the strand displacement activity of DNA polymerase δ. The reactions were performed as described under “Experimental Procedures.” A, schematic representation of the various DNA templates used. The size of the resulting gaps is indicated in nt. The position of the AP site on the 100-mer template strand is indicated relative to the 3′ end. Base pairs in the vicinity of the lesion are indicated by dashes. The size of the gaps (35–38 nt) is consistent with the size of ssDNA covered by a single RP-A molecule, which has to be released during Okazaki fragment synthesis when the DNA pol is approaching the 5′-end of the downstream fragment. When the AP site is covered by the downstream terminator oligonucleotide (Gap-3 and Gap-1 templates) the nucleotide placed on the opposite strand is C to mimic the situation generated by spontaneous loss of a guanine or excision of an oxidized guanine, whereas when the AP site is covered by the primer (nicked AP template), the nucleotide placed on the opposite strand is A to mimic the most frequent incorporation event occurring opposite an AP site. B, human PCNA was titrated in the presence of 15 nm (lanes 2–4 and 10–12) or 30 nm (lanes 6–8 and 14–16) recombinant human four subunit DNA pol δ, on a linear control (lanes 1–8) or a 38-nt gap control (lanes 9–16) template. Lanes 1, 5, 9, and 13, control reactions in the absence of PCNA. C, human PCNA was titrated in the presence of 60 nm DNA pol δ, on a linear AP (lanes 2–4) or 38-nt gap AP (lanes 6–9) template. Lanes 1 and 5, control reactions in the absence of PCNA.     

Replication Stress Leads to Genome Instabilities in Arabidopsis DNA Polymerase δ Mutants

Impeded DNA replication or a deficiency of its control may critically threaten the genetic information of cells, possibly resulting in genome alterations, such as gross chromosomal translocations, microsatellite instabilities, or increased rates of homologous recombination (HR). We examined an Arabidopsis thaliana line derived from a forward genetic screen, which exhibits an elevated frequency of somatic HR. These HR events originate from replication stress in endoreduplicating cells caused by reduced expression of the gene coding for the catalytic subunit of the DNA polymerase δ (POLδ1). The analysis of recombination types induced by diverse alleles of polδ1 and by replication inhibitors allows the conclusion that two not mutually exclusive mechanisms lead to the generation of recombinogenic breaks at replication forks. In plants with weak polδ1 alleles, we observe genome instabilities predominantly at sites with inverted repeats, suggesting the formation and processing of aberrant secondary DNA structures as a result of the accumulation of unreplicated DNA. Stalled and collapsed replication forks account for the more drastic enhancement of HR in plants with strong polδ1 mutant alleles. Our data suggest that efficient progression of DNA replication, foremost on the lagging strand, relies on the physiological level of the polymerase δ complex and that even a minor disturbance of the replication process critically threatens genomic integrity of Arabidopsis cells.     

Initiation of New DNA Strands by the Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Primase-Helicase Complex and Either Herpes DNA Polymerase or Human DNA Polymerase ��

A key set of reactions for the initiation of new DNA strands during herpes simplex virus-1 replication consists of the primase-catalyzed synthesis of short RNA primers followed by polymerase-catalyzed DNA synthesis (i.e. primase-coupled polymerase activity). Herpes primase (UL5-UL52-UL8) synthesizes products from 2 to ∼13 nucleotides long. However, the herpes polymerase (UL30 or UL30-UL42) only elongates those at least 8 nucleotides long. Surprisingly, coupled activity was remarkably inefficient, even considering only those primers at least 8 nucleotides long, and herpes polymerase typically elongated <2% of the primase-synthesized primers. Of those primers elongated, only 4–26% of the primers were passed directly from the primase to the polymerase (UL30-UL42) without dissociating into solution. Comparing RNA primer-templates and DNA primer-templates of identical sequence showed that herpes polymerase greatly preferred to elongate the DNA primer by 650–26,000-fold, thus accounting for the extremely low efficiency with which herpes polymerase elongated primase-synthesized primers. Curiously, one of the DNA polymerases of the host cell, polymerase α (p70-p180 or p49-p58-p70-p180 complex), extended herpes primase-synthesized RNA primers much more efficiently than the viral polymerase, raising the possibility that the viral polymerase may not be the only one involved in herpes DNA replication.Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)² encodes seven proteins essential for replicating its double-stranded DNA genome; five of these encode the heterotrimeric helicase-primase (UL5-UL52-UL8 gene products) and the heterodimeric polymerase (UL30-UL42 gene products) (1, 2). The helicase-primase unwinds the DNA at the replication fork and generates single-stranded DNA for both leading and lagging strand synthesis. Primase synthesizes short RNA primers on the lagging strand that the polymerase presumably elongates using dNTPs (i.e. primase-coupled polymerase activity). These two protein complexes are thought to replicate the viral genome on both the leading and lagging strands (1, 2).Previous studies have focused on the helicase-primase and polymerase separately. The helicase-primase contains three subunits, UL5, UL52, and UL8 in a 1:1:1 ratio (3–5). The UL5 subunit has helicase-like motifs and the UL52 subunit has primase-like motifs, yet the minimal active complex that demonstrates either helicase or primase activities contains both UL5 and UL52 (6, 7). Although the UL8 subunit has no known catalytic activity, several functions have been proposed, including enhancing helicase and primase activities, enhancing primer synthesis on ICP8 (the HSV-1 single-stranded binding protein)-coated DNA strands, and facilitating formation of the replisome (8–12). Although primase will synthesize short (2–3 nucleotides long) primers on a variety of template sequences, synthesis of longer primers up to 13 nucleotides long requires the template sequence, 3′-deoxyguanidine-pyrimidine-pyrimidine-5′ (13). Primase initiates synthesis at the first pyrimidine via the polymerization of two purine NTPs (13). Even after initiation at this sequence, however, the vast majority of products are only 2–3 nucleotides long (13, 14).The herpes polymerase consists of the UL30 subunit, which has polymerase and 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activities (1, 2), and the UL42 subunit, which serves as a processivity factor (15–17). Unlike most processivity factors that encircle the DNA, the UL42 protein binds double-stranded DNA and thus directly tethers the polymerase to the DNA (18). Using pre-existing DNA primer-templates as the substrate, the heterodimeric polymerase (UL30-UL42) incorporates dNTPs at a rate of 150 s^–1, a rate much faster than primer synthesis (for primers >7 nucleotides long, 0.0002–0.01 s^–1) (19, 20).We examined primase-coupled polymerase activity by the herpes primase and polymerase complexes. Although herpes primase synthesizes RNA primers 2–13 nucleotides long, the polymerase only effectively elongates those at least 8 nucleotides long. Surprisingly, the polymerase elongated only a small fraction of the primase-synthesized primers (<1–2%), likely because of the polymerase elongating RNA primer-templates much less efficiently than DNA primer-templates. In contrast, human DNA polymerase α (pol α) elongated the herpes primase-synthesized primers very efficiently. The biological significance of these data is discussed.     

Error-Prone Replication through UV Lesions by DNA Polymerase θ Protects against Skin Cancers

1. Download high-res image (204KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Differential regulation of cell death programs in males and females by Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 and 17 β estradiol

Cell death can be divided into the anti-inflammatory process of apoptosis and the pro-inflammatory process of necrosis. Necrosis, as apoptosis, is a regulated form of cell death, and Poly-(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and Receptor-Interacting Protein (RIP) 1/3 are major mediators. We previously showed that absence or inhibition of PARP-1 protects mice from nephritis, however only the male mice. We therefore hypothesized that there is an inherent difference in the cell death program between the sexes. We show here that in an immune-mediated nephritis model, female mice show increased apoptosis compared to male mice. Treatment of the male mice with estrogens induced apoptosis to levels similar to that in female mice and inhibited necrosis. Although PARP-1 was activated in both male and female mice, PARP-1 inhibition reduced necrosis only in the male mice. We also show that deletion of RIP-3 did not have a sex bias. We demonstrate here that male and female mice are prone to different types of cell death. Our data also suggest that estrogens and PARP-1 are two of the mediators of the sex-bias in cell death. We therefore propose that targeting cell death based on sex will lead to tailored and better treatments for each gender.     

Active Site Mutations in Mammalian DNA Polymerase δ Alter Accuracy and Replication Fork Progression

DNA polymerase δ (pol δ) is one of the two main replicative polymerases in eukaryotes; it synthesizes the lagging DNA strand and also functions in DNA repair. In previous work, we demonstrated that heterozygous expression of the pol δ L604G variant in mice results in normal life span and no apparent phenotype, whereas a different substitution at the same position, L604K, is associated with shortened life span and accelerated carcinogenesis. Here, we report in vitro analysis of the homologous mutations at position Leu-606 in human pol δ. Four-subunit human pol δ variants that harbor or lack 3′ → 5′-exonucleolytic proofreading activity were purified from Escherichia coli. The pol δ L606G and L606K holoenzymes retain catalytic activity and processivity similar to that of wild type pol δ. pol δ L606G is highly error prone, incorporating single noncomplementary nucleotides at a high frequency during DNA synthesis, whereas pol δ L606K is extremely accurate, with a higher fidelity of single nucleotide incorporation by the active site than that of wild type pol δ. However, pol δ L606K is impaired in the bypass of DNA adducts, and the homologous variant in mouse embryonic fibroblasts results in a decreased rate of replication fork progression in vivo. These results indicate that different substitutions at a single active site residue in a eukaryotic polymerase can either increase or decrease the accuracy of synthesis relative to wild type and suggest that enhanced fidelity of base selection by a polymerase active site can result in impaired lesion bypass and delayed replication fork progression.     

Biochemical Analysis of DNA Polymerase η Fidelity in the Presence of Replication Protein A

DNA polymerase η (pol η) synthesizes across from damaged DNA templates in order to prevent deleterious consequences like replication fork collapse and double-strand breaks. This process, termed translesion synthesis (TLS), is an overall positive for the cell, as cells deficient in pol η display higher mutation rates. This outcome occurs despite the fact that the in vitro fidelity of bypass by pol η alone is moderate to low, depending on the lesion being copied. One possible means of increasing the fidelity of pol η is interaction with replication accessory proteins present at the replication fork. We have previously utilized a bacteriophage based screening system to measure the fidelity of bypass using purified proteins. Here we report on the fidelity effects of a single stranded binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), when copying the oxidative lesion 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-guanine(8-oxoG) and the UV-induced cis-syn thymine-thymine cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (T-T CPD). We observed no change in fidelity dependent on RPA when copying these damaged templates. This result is consistent in multiple position contexts. We previously identified single amino acid substitution mutants of pol η that have specific effects on fidelity when copying both damaged and undamaged templates. In order to confirm our results, we examined the Q38A and Y52E mutants in the same full-length construct. We again observed no difference when RPA was added to the bypass reaction, with the mutant forms of pol η displaying similar fidelity regardless of RPA status. We do, however, observe some slight effects when copying undamaged DNA, similar to those we have described previously. Our results indicate that RPA by itself does not affect pol η dependent lesion bypass fidelity when copying either 8-oxoG or T-T CPD lesions.     

Promiscuous Usage of Nucleotides by the DNA Helicase of Bacteriophage T7: DETERMINANTS OF NUCLEOTIDE SPECIFICITY*S?

The multifunctional protein encoded by gene 4 of bacteriophage T7 (gp4) provides both helicase and primase activity at the replication fork. T7 DNA helicase preferentially utilizes dTTP to unwind duplex DNA in vitro but also hydrolyzes other nucleotides, some of which do not support helicase activity. Very little is known regarding the architecture of the nucleotide binding site in determining nucleotide specificity. Crystal structures of the T7 helicase domain with bound dATP or dTTP identified Arg-363 and Arg-504 as potential determinants of the specificity for dATP and dTTP. Arg-363 is in close proximity to the sugar of the bound dATP, whereas Arg-504 makes a hydrogen bridge with the base of bound dTTP. T7 helicase has a serine at position 319, whereas bacterial helicases that use rATP have a threonine in the comparable position. Therefore, in the present study we have examined the role of these residues (Arg-363, Arg-504, and Ser-319) in determining nucleotide specificity. Our results show that Arg-363 is responsible for dATP, dCTP, and dGTP hydrolysis, whereas Arg-504 and Ser-319 confer dTTP specificity. Helicase-R504A hydrolyzes dCTP far better than wild-type helicase, and the hydrolysis of dCTP fuels unwinding of DNA. Substitution of threonine for serine 319 reduces the rate of hydrolysis of dTTP without affecting the rate of dATP hydrolysis. We propose that different nucleotides bind to the nucleotide binding site of T7 helicase by an induced fit mechanism. We also present evidence that T7 helicase uses the energy derived from the hydrolysis of dATP in addition to dTTP for mediating DNA unwinding.Helicases are molecular machines that translocate unidirectionally along single-stranded nucleic acids using the energy derived from nucleotide hydrolysis (1–3). The gene 4 protein encoded by bacteriophage T7 consists of a helicase domain and a primase domain, located in the C-terminal and N-terminal halves of the protein, respectively (4). The T7 helicase functions as a hexamer and has been used as a model to study ring-shaped replicative helicases. In the presence of dTTP, T7 helicase binds to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)³ as a hexamer and translocates 5′ to 3′ along the DNA strand using the energy of hydrolysis of dTTP (5–7). T7 helicase hydrolyzes a variety of ribo and deoxyribonucleotides; however, dTTP hydrolysis is optimally coupled to DNA unwinding (5).Most hexameric helicases use rATP to fuel translocation and unwind DNA (3). T7 helicase does hydrolyze rATP but with a 20-fold higher K_m as compared with dTTP (5, 8). It has been suggested that T7 helicase actually uses rATP in vivo where the concentration of rATP is 20-fold that of dTTP in the Escherichia coli cell (8). However, hydrolysis of rATP, even at optimal concentrations, is poorly coupled to translocation and unwinding of DNA (9). Other ribonucleotides (rCTP, rGTP, and rUTP) are either not hydrolyzed or the poor hydrolysis observed is not coupled to DNA unwinding (8). Furthermore, Patel et al. (10) found that the form of T7 helicase found in vivo, an equimolar mixture of the full-length gp4 and a truncated form lacking the zinc binding domain of the primase, prefers dTTP and dATP. Therefore, in the present study we have restricted our examination of nucleotides to the deoxyribonucleotides.The nucleotide binding site of the replicative DNA helicases, such as T7 gene 4 protein, bind nucleotides at the subunit interface (Fig. 1) located between two RecA-like subdomains that bind ATP (11, 12). The location of the nucleotide binding site at the subunit interface provides multiple interactions of residues with the bound NTP. A number of cis- and trans-acting amino acids stabilize the bound nucleotide in the nucleotide binding site and also provide for communication between subunits (13–15). Earlier reports revealed that the arginine finger (Arg-522) in T7 helicase is positioned to interact with the γ-phosphate of the bound nucleotide in the adjacent subunit (12, 16). However, His-465 (phosphate sensor), Glu-343 (catalytic base), and Asp-424 (Walker motif B) interacts with the γ-phosphate of the bound nucleotide in the same subunit (12, 17, 18). The arginine finger and the phosphate sensor have been proposed to couple NTP hydrolysis to DNA unwinding. Substitution of Glu-343, the catalytic base, eliminates dTTP hydrolysis (19), and substitution of Asp-424 with Asn leads to a severe reduction in dTTP hydrolysis (20). The conserved Lys-318 in Walker motif A interacts with the β-phosphate of the bound nucleotide and plays an important role in dTTP hydrolysis (21).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Crystal structure of T7 helicase. A, crystal structure of the hexameric helicase C-terminal domain of gp4 (17). The structure reveals a ring-shaped molecule with a central core through which ssDNA passes. The inset shows the interface between two subunits of the helicase with adenosine 5′-{β,γ-imidol}-triphosphate in the nucleotide binding site. B, the nucleotide binding site of a monomer of the gp4 with the crucial amino acid residues reported earlier and in the present study is shown in sticks. The crystal structures of the T7 gene 4 helicase domain (12) with bound dTTP (C) and dATP (D). The structures shown are the nucleotide binding site of T7 helicase as viewed in Pymol by analyzing the PDB files 1cr1 and 1cr2 (12). Arg-504 and Tyr-535 sandwiches the base of the bound dNTP. Additionally, Arg-504 forms a hydrogen bridge with dTTP. Arg-363 interacts specifically with the 3-OH group of bound dATP. AMPPNP, adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imino)triphosphate.Considering the wealth of information on the above residues that are involved in the hydrolysis of dTTP and the coupling of hydrolysis to unwinding, it is intriguing that little information is available on nucleotide specificity. Several crystal structures of T7 helicase in complex with a nucleotide triphosphate are available. However, most of structures were crystallized with a non-hydrolyzable analogue of dTTP or the nucleotide was diffused into the crystal. The crystal structure of the T7 helicase domain bound with dTTP or dATP was reported by Sawaya et al. (12). These structures assisted us in identifying two basic residues (Arg-363 and Arg-504) in close proximity to the sugar and base of the bound nucleotide whose orientation suggested that these residues could be involved in nucleotide selection. Arg-504 together with Tyr-535 sandwich the base of the bound nucleotide at the subunit interface of the hexameric helicase (Fig. 1). Arg-504 and Tyr-535 are structurally well conserved in various helicases (12). However, Arg-504 could make a hydrogen bridge with the OH group of thymidine, thus suggesting a role in dTTP specificity. On the other hand, Arg-363 is in close proximity (∼3.4 Å) to the sugar 3′-OH of bound dATP, whereas in the dTTP-bound structure this residue is displaced by 7.12 Å (Fig. 1) from the equivalent position. Consequently Arg-363 could play a role in dATP binding. The crystal structures do not provide any information on different interaction of residues with the phosphates of dATP and dTTP. However, alignment of the residues in the P-loops of different hexameric helicases reveals that the serine adjacent to the invariant lysine at position 319 (Ser-319) is conserved in bacteriophages, whereas bacterial helicases have a conserved threonine in the equivalent position (supplemental Fig. 1). Bacterial helicases use rATP in the DNA unwinding reactions. whereas T7 helicase preferentially uses dTTP, and bacteriophage T4 gene 41 uses rGTP or rATP (22).Although considerable information is available on the role of residues in nucleotide binding and dTTP hydrolysis, very little is known on the determinants of nucleotide specificity. In the present study we made an attempt to address the role of a few selected residues (Arg-363, Arg-504, and Ser-319) in determining nucleotide specificity, especially dTTP and dATP, both of which are hydrolyzed and mediate DNA unwinding. We show that under physiological conditions T7 helicase uses the energy derived from the hydrolysis of dATP in addition to dTTP for mediating DNA unwinding.