Bacterial ApbC Protein Has Two Biochemical Activities That Are Required for in Vivo Function

The ApbC protein has been shown previously to bind and rapidly transfer iron-sulfur ([Fe-S]) clusters to an apoprotein (Boyd, J. M., Pierik, A. J., Netz, D. J., Lill, R., and Downs, D. M. (2008) Biochemistry 47, 8195–8202. This study utilized both in vivo and in vitro assays to examine the function of variant ApbC proteins. The in vivo assays assessed the ability of ApbC proteins to function in pathways with low and high demand for [Fe-S] cluster proteins. Variant ApbC proteins were purified and assayed for the ability to hydrolyze ATP, bind [Fe-S] cluster, and transfer [Fe-S] cluster. This study details the first kinetic analysis of ATP hydrolysis for a member of the ParA subfamily of “deviant” Walker A proteins. Moreover, this study details the first functional analysis of mutant variants of the ever expanding family of ApbC/Nbp35 [Fe-S] cluster biosynthetic proteins. The results herein show that ApbC protein needs ATPase activity and the ability to bind and rapidly transfer [Fe-S] clusters for in vivo function.Proteins containing iron-sulfur ([Fe-S]) clusters are employed in a wide array of metabolic functions (reviewed in Ref. 1). Research addressing the biosynthesis of the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase in Azotobacter vinelandii led to the discovery of an operon (iscA^nifnifUSVcysE1) involved in the biosynthesis of [Fe-S] clusters (reviewed in Ref. 2). Subsequent experiments led to the finding of two more systems involved in the de novo biosynthesis of [Fe-S] clusters, the isc and the suf systems (3, 4). Like Escherichia coli, the genome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium encodes for the isc and suf [Fe-S] cluster biosynthesis machinery.Recent studies have identified a number of additional or non-isc/-suf-encoded proteins that are involved in bacterial [Fe-S] cluster biosynthesis and repair. Examples include the following: CyaY, an iron-binding protein believed to be involved in iron trafficking and iron delivery (5–7); YggX, an Fe²⁺-binding protein that protects the cell from oxidative stress (8, 9); ErpA, an alternate A-type [Fe-S] cluster scaffolding protein (10); NfuA, a proposed intermediate [Fe-S] delivery protein (11–13); YtfE, a protein proposed to be involved in [Fe-S] cluster repair (14, 15); and CsdA-CsdE, an alternative cysteine desulferase (16).Analysis of the metabolic network anchored to thiamine biosynthesis in S. enterica identified lesions in three non-isc or -suf loci that compromise Fe-S metabolism as follows: apbC, apbE, and rseC (17–21). This metabolic system was subsequently used to dissect a role for cyaY and gshA in [Fe-S] cluster metabolism (6, 22, 23). Of these, the apbC (mrp in E. coli) locus was identified as the predominant site of lesions that altered thiamine synthesis by disrupting [Fe-S] cluster metabolism (17, 18).ApbC is a member of the ParA subfamily of proteins that have a wide array of functions, including electron transfer (24), initiation of cell division (25), and DNA segregation (26, 27). Importantly, ATP hydrolysis is required for function of all well characterized members of this subfamily, and all members contain a “deviant” Walker A motif, which contains two lysine residues instead of one (GKXXXGK(S/T)) (28). ApbC has been shown to hydrolyze ATP (17).Recently, five proteins with a high degree of identity to ApbC have been shown to be involved in [Fe-S] cluster metabolism in eukaryotes. The sequence alignments of the central portion of these proteins and bacterial ApbC are shown in Fig. 1. HCF101 was demonstrated to be involved in chloroplast [Fe-S] cluster metabolism (29, 30). The CFD1, Npb35, and huNbp35 (formally Nubp1) proteins were demonstrated to be involved in cytoplasmic [Fe-S] cluster metabolism (31, 32). Ind1 was demonstrated to be involved in the maturation of [Fe-S] clusters in the mitochondrial enzyme NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (33). There is currently no report of any of these proteins hydrolyzing ATP.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Protein sequence alignments of members of the ApbC/Nbp35 subfamily of ParA family of proteins. Protein alignments were assembled using the Clustal_W method in the Lasergene® software and show only the central portion of the proteins, which have the highest sequence conservation. The three boxed areas highlight the Walker A box, conserved Ser residue, and CXXC motif. Proteins listed are as follows: ApbC (S. enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2), CFD1 (S. cerevisiae), Nbp35 (S. cerevisiae), HCF101 (Arabidopsis thaliana), huNpb35 (formally Nubp1) (Homo sapiens), and Ind1 (Candida albicans).Biochemical analysis of ApbC indicated that it could bind and transfer [Fe-S] clusters to Saccharomyces cerevisiae apo-isopropylmalate isomerase (34). Additional genetic studies indicated that ApbC has a degree of functional redundancy with IscU, a known [Fe-S] cluster scaffolding protein (35, 36).In this study we investigate the correlation between the biochemical properties of ApbC (i.e. ATPase activity, [Fe-S] cluster binding, and [Fe-S] cluster transfer rates) and the in vivo function of this protein. This is the first detailed kinetic analysis of ATP hydrolysis for a member of the ParA subfamily of deviant Walker A proteins and the first functional analysis of a member of the ever expanding family of ApbC/Nbp35 proteins. Data presented indicate that noncomplementing variants have distinct biochemical properties that place them in three distinct classes.     

Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Rab1 Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor SidM Is a Major Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate-binding Effector Protein of Legionella pneumophila

The causative agent of Legionnaires disease, Legionella pneumophila, forms a replicative vacuole in phagocytes by means of the intracellular multiplication/defective organelle trafficking (Icm/Dot) type IV secretion system and translocated effector proteins, some of which subvert host GTP and phosphoinositide (PI) metabolism. The Icm/Dot substrate SidC anchors to the membrane of Legionella-containing vacuoles (LCVs) by specifically binding to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P). Using a nonbiased screen for novel L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins, we identified the Rab1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) SidM/DrrA as the predominant PtdIns(4)P-binding protein. Purified SidM specifically and directly bound to PtdIns(4)P, whereas the SidM-interacting Icm/Dot substrate LidA preferentially bound PtdIns(3)P but also PtdIns(4)P, and the L. pneumophila Arf1 GEF RalF did not bind to any PIs. The PtdIns(4)P-binding domain of SidM was mapped to the 12-kDa C-terminal sequence, termed “P4M” (PtdIns4P binding of SidM/DrrA). The isolated P4M domain is largely helical and displayed higher PtdIns(4)P binding activity in the context of the α-helical, monomeric full-length protein. SidM constructs containing P4M were translocated by Icm/Dot-proficient L. pneumophila and localized to the LCV membrane, indicating that SidM anchors to PtdIns(4)P on LCVs via its P4M domain. An L. pneumophila ΔsidM mutant strain displayed significantly higher amounts of SidC on LCVs, suggesting that SidM and SidC compete for limiting amounts of PtdIns(4)P on the vacuole. Finally, RNA interference revealed that PtdIns(4)P on LCVs is specifically formed by host PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ. Thus, L. pneumophila exploits PtdIns(4)P produced by PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ to anchor the effectors SidC and SidM to LCVs.The Gram-negative pathogen Legionella pneumophila is the causative agent of Legionnaires disease, but it evolved as a parasite of various species of environmental predatory protozoa, including the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum (1, 2). The human disease is linked to the inhalation of contaminated aerosols, followed by replication in alveolar macrophages. To accommodate the transfer between host cells, L. pneumophila alternates between replicative and transmissive phases, the regulation of which includes an apparent quorum-sensing system (3–5).In macrophages and amoebae, L. pneumophila forms a replicative compartment, the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV).³ LCVs avoid fusion with lysosomes (6), intercept vesicular traffic at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) exit sites (7), and fuse with the ER (8–10). The uptake of L. pneumophila and formation of LCVs in macrophages and amoebae depends on the Icm/Dot type IV secretion system (T4SS) (11–14). Although more than 100 Icm/Dot substrates (“effector” proteins) have been identified to date, only few are functionally characterized, including effectors that interfere with host cell signal transduction, vesicle trafficking, or apoptotic pathways (15–18).Two Icm/Dot-translocated substrates, SidM/DrrA (19, 20) and RalF (21), have been characterized as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rho subfamily of small GTPases. These bacterial GEFs are recruited to and activate their targets on LCVs. Small GTPases of the Rho subfamily are involved in many eukaryotic signal transduction pathways and in actin cytoskeleton regulation (22). Inactive Rho GTPases bind GDP and a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI). The GTPases are activated by removal of the GDI and the exchange of GDP with GTP by GEFs, which promotes the interaction with downstream effector proteins, such as protein or lipid kinases and various adaptor proteins. The cycle is closed by hydrolysis of the bound GTP, which is mediated by GTPase-activating proteins.SidM is a GEF for Rab1, which is essential for ER to Golgi vesicle transport, and additionally, SidM acts as a GDI displacement factor (GDF) to activate Rab1 (23, 24). The function of SidM is assisted by the Icm/Dot substrate LidA, which also localizes to LCVs. LidA preferentially binds to activated Rab1, thus supporting the recruitment of early secretory vesicles by SidM (19, 20, 23, 25, 26). Another Icm/Dot substrate, LepB (27), contributes to Rab1-mediated membrane cycling by inactivating Rab1 through its GTPase-activating protein function, thus acting as an antagonist of SidM (24).The Icm/Dot substrate RalF recruits and activates the small GTPase ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (Arf1), which is involved in retrograde vesicle transport from Golgi to ER (21). Dominant negative Arf1 (7, 28) or knockdown of Arf1 by RNA interference (29) impairs the formation of LCVs, as well as the recruitment of the Icm/Dot substrate SidC to the LCV (30).SidC and its paralogue SdcA localize to the LCV membrane (31), where the proteins specifically bind to the host cell lipid phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P) (32, 33). Phosphoinositides (PIs) regulate eukaryotic receptor-mediated signal transduction, actin remodeling, and membrane dynamics (34, 35). PtdIns(4)P is present on the cytoplasmic membrane, but localizes preferentially to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), where this PI is produced by an Arf-dependent recruitment of PtdIns(4)P kinase IIIβ (PI4K IIIβ) (36) to promote trafficking along the secretory pathway. Recently, PtdIns(4)P was found to also mediate the export of early secretory vesicles from ER exit sites (37). At present, the L. pneumophila effector proteins that mediate exploitation of host PI signaling remain ill defined.In a nonbiased screen for L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins using different PIs coupled to agarose beads, we identified SidM as a major PtdIns(4)P-binding effector. We mapped its PtdIns(4)P binding activity to a novel P4M domain within a 12-kDa C-terminal sequence. SidM constructs, including the P4M domain, were found to be translocated and bind the LCV membrane, where the levels of PtdIns(4)P are controlled by PI4K IIIβ.     

RecR-mediated Modulation of RecF Dimer Specificity for Single- and Double-stranded DNA

RecF pathway proteins play an important role in the restart of stalled replication and DNA repair in prokaryotes. Following DNA damage, RecF, RecR, and RecO initiate homologous recombination (HR) by loading of the RecA recombinase on single-stranded (ss) DNA, protected by ssDNA-binding protein. The specific role of RecF in this process is not well understood. Previous studies have proposed that RecF directs the RecOR complex to boundaries of damaged DNA regions by recognizing single-stranded/double-stranded (ss/ds) DNA junctions. RecF belongs to ABC-type ATPases, which function through an ATP-dependent dimerization. Here, we demonstrate that the RecF of Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with DNA as an ATP-dependent dimer, and that the DNA binding and ATPase activity of RecF depend on both the structure of DNA substrate, and the presence of RecR. We found that RecR interacts as a tetramer with the RecF dimer. RecR increases the RecF affinity to dsDNA without stimulating ATP hydrolysis but destabilizes RecF binding to ssDNA and dimerization, likely due to increasing the ATPase rate. The DNA-dependent binding of RecR to the RecF-DNA complex occurs through specific protein-protein interactions without significant contributions from RecR-DNA interactions. Finally, RecF neither alone nor in complex with RecR preferentially binds to the ss/dsDNA junction. Our data suggest that the specificity of the RecFOR complex toward the boundaries of DNA damaged regions may result from a network of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions, rather than a simple recognition of the ss/dsDNA junction by RecF.Homologous recombination (HR)² is one of the primary mechanisms by which cells repair dsDNA breaks (DSBs) and ssDNA gaps (SSGs), and is important for restart of stalled DNA replication (1). HR is initiated when RecA-like recombinases bind to ssDNA forming an extended nucleoprotein filament, referred to as a presynaptic complex (2). The potential for genetic rearrangements dictates that HR initiation is tightly regulated at multiple levels (1). During replication, the ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) protects transiently unwound DNA chains, preventing interactions with recombinases. Following DNA damage, recombination mediator proteins (RMPs) initiate HR by facilitating the formation of the recombinase filaments with ssDNA, while removing SSB (3, 4). Mutations in human proteins involved in HR initiation are linked to cancer predisposition, chromosome instability, UV sensitivity, and premature aging diseases (4–8). To date, little is known about the mechanism by which RMPs regulate the formation of the recombinase filaments on the SSB-protected ssDNA.In Escherichia coli, there are two major recombination pathways, RecBCD and RecF (9, 10). A helicase/nuclease RecBCD complex processes DSBs and recruits RecA on ssDNA in a sequence-specific manner (11–13). The principle players in the RecF pathway are the RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins, which form an epistatic group that is important for SSG repair, for restart of stalled DNA replication, and under specific conditions, can also process DSBs (14–20). Homologs of RecF, -O, and -R are present in the majority of known bacteria (21), including Deinococcus radiodurans, extremely radiation-resistant bacteria that lacks the RecBCD pathway, yet is capable of repairing thousands of DSBs (22, 23). In addition, the sequence or functional homologs of RecF pathway proteins are involved in similar pathways in eukaryotes that include among others WRN, BLM, RAD52, and BRCA2 proteins (4–8).The involvement of all three RecF, -O, and -R proteins in HR initiation is well documented by genetic and cellular approaches (18, 24–30), yet their biochemical functions in the initiation process remain unclear, particularly with respect to RecF. RecO and RecR proteins are sufficient to promote formation of the RecA filament on SSB-bound ssDNA in vitro (27). The UV-sensitive phenotype of recF mutants can be suppressed by RecOR overexpression, suggesting that RecF may direct the RMP complex to DNA-damaged regions where HR initiation is required (31). In agreement with this hypothesis, RecF dramatically increases the efficiency of the RecA loading at ds/ssDNA junctions with a 3′ ssDNA extension under specific conditions (32). RecF and RecR proteins also prevent the RecA filaments from extending into dsDNA regions adjacent to SSGs (33). These data suggest that RecF may directly recognize an ss/dsDNA junction structure (34). However, DNA binding experiments have not provided clear evidence to support such a hypothesis (11).The targeting promoted by RecF may also occur through more complex processes. RecF shares a high structural similarity with the head domain of Rad50, an ABC-type ATPase that recognizes DSBs and initiates repair in archaea and eukaryotes (35). All known ABC-type ATPases function as oligomeric complexes in which a sequence of inter- and intra-molecular interactions is triggered by the ATP-dependent dimerization and the dimer-dependent ATP hydrolysis (36–39). RecF is also an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and a weak DNA-dependent ATPase (11, 40). RecF forms an ATP-dependent dimer and all three conserved motifs (Walker A, Walker B, and “signature”) of RecF are important for ATP-dependent dimerization, ATP hydrolysis, and functional resistance to DNA damage (35). Thus, RecF may function in recombination initiation through a complex pathway of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions regulated by ATP-dependent RecF dimerization.In this report, we present a detailed characterization of the RecF dimerization, and its role in the RecF interaction with various DNA substrates, with RecR, and in ATP hydrolysis. Our data outline the following key findings. First, RecF interacts with DNA as a dimer. Second, neither RecF alone nor the RecFR complex preferentially binds the ss/dsDNA junction. Finally, RecR changes the ATPase activity and the DNA binding of RecF by destabilizing the interaction with ssDNA, and greatly enhancing the interaction with dsDNA. Our results suggest that the specificity of RecF for the boundaries of SSGs is likely to result from a sequence of protein-protein interaction events rather than a simple RecF ss/dsDNA binding, underlining a highly regulated mechanism of the HR initiation by the RecFOR proteins.     

Specific Activation of mTORC1 by Rheb G-protein in Vitro Involves Enhanced Recruitment of Its Substrate Protein

Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand, the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42 did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition, the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins (1). We have shown that Rheb proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human (2). Although yeast and fruit fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1) (2). Structurally, these proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide binding (1, 3, 4). Rheb proteins have a conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras (1). The effector domain required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and its adjacent sequences (1, 5). Structural analysis by x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues 35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange (6). In addition, all Rheb proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins are farnesylated (7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions (10–14). Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a GTPase-activating protein for Rheb (15–19). Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional domain for the down-regulation of Rheb (20). Mutations in the Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts of the body as well as neurological symptoms (21, 22). Overexpression of Rheb results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients (15, 16). Two mTOR complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified (23, 24). Whereas mTORC1 is involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2 (25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex (26–28). Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was reported (29). Rheb has been shown to interact with mTOR (27, 30), and this may involve direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR (27). However, this Rheb/mTOR interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP bound to Rheb (27, 28). Recently, a different model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein 38) mediates the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed (31, 32). In this model, FKBP38 binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent reports dispute this idea (33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR.     

Identification and Manipulation of the Caprazamycin Gene Cluster Lead to New Simplified Liponucleoside Antibiotics and Give Insights into the Biosynthetic Pathway

Caprazamycins are potent anti-mycobacterial liponucleoside antibiotics isolated from Streptomyces sp. MK730-62F2 and belong to the translocase I inhibitor family. Their complex structure is derived from 5′-(β-O-aminoribosyl)-glycyluridine and comprises a unique N-methyldiazepanone ring. The biosynthetic gene cluster has been identified, cloned, and sequenced, representing the first gene cluster of a translocase I inhibitor. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of 23 open reading frames putatively involved in export, resistance, regulation, and biosynthesis of the caprazamycins. Heterologous expression of the gene cluster in Streptomyces coelicolor M512 led to the production of non-glycosylated bioactive caprazamycin derivatives. A set of gene deletions validated the boundaries of the cluster and inactivation of cpz21 resulted in the accumulation of novel simplified liponucleoside antibiotics that lack the 3-methylglutaryl moiety. Therefore, Cpz21 is assigned to act as an acyltransferase in caprazamycin biosynthesis. In vivo and in silico analysis of the caprazamycin biosynthetic gene cluster allows a first proposal of the biosynthetic pathway and provides insights into the biosynthesis of related uridyl-antibiotics.Caprazamycins (CPZs)² (Fig. 1, 1) are liponucleoside antibiotics isolated from a fermentation broth of Streptomyces sp. MK730-62F2 (1, 2). They show excellent activity in vitro against Gram-positive bacteria, in particular against the genus Mycobacterium including Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium avium, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (3). In a pulmonary mouse model with M. tuberculosis H37Rv, administration of caprazamycin B exhibited a therapeutic effect but no significant toxicity (4). Structural elucidation (2) revealed a complex and unique composition of elements the CPZs share only with the closely related liposidomycins (LPMs, 2) (5). The core skeleton is the (+)-caprazol (5) composed of an N-alkylated 5′-(β-O-aminoribosyl)-glycyluridine, also known from FR-900493 (6) (6) and the muraymycins (7) (7), which is cyclized to form a rare diazepanone ring. Attached to the 3′″-OH are β-hydroxy fatty acids of different chain length resulting in CPZs A–G (1). They differ from the LPMs in the absence of a sulfate group at the 2″-position of the aminoribose and the presence of a permethylated l-rhamnose β-glycosidically linked to the 3-methylglutaryl (3-MG) moiety.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Nucleoside antibiotics of the translocase I inhibitor family.The LPMs have been shown to inhibit biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall by targeting the formation of lipid I (8). The CPZs are expected to act in the same way and are assigned to the growing number of translocase I inhibitors that include other nucleoside antibiotics, like the tunicamycins and mureidomycins (9). During peptidoglycan formation, translocase I catalyzes the transfer of UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide to the undecaprenyl phosphate carrier to generate lipid I (10). This reaction is considered an unexploited and promising target for new anti-infective drugs (11).Recent investigations indicate that the 3″-OH group (12), the amino group of the aminoribosyl-glycyluridine, and an intact uracil moiety (13) are essential for the inhibition of the Escherichia coli translocase I MraY. The chemical synthesis of the (+)-caprazol (5) was recently accomplished (14), however, this compound only shows weak antibacterial activity. In contrast, the acylated compounds 3 and 4 exhibit strong growth inhibition of mycobacteria, suggesting a potential role of the fatty acid side chain in penetration of the bacterial cell (15, 16). Apparently, the acyl-caprazols (4) represent the most simplified antibiotically active liponucleosides and a good starting point for further optimization of this class of potential therapeutics.Although chemical synthesis and biological activity of CPZs and LPMs has been studied in some detail, their biosynthesis remains speculative and only few data exists about the formation of other translocase I inhibitors (17, 18). Nevertheless, we assume that the CPZ biosynthetic pathway is partially similar to that of LPMs, FR-90043 (6), and muraymycins (7) and presents a model for the comprehension and manipulation of liponucleoside formation. Considering the unique structural features of the CPZs we also expect some unusual biotransformations to be involved in the formation of, e.g. the (+)-caprazol.Here we report the identification and analysis of the CPZ gene cluster, the first cluster of a translocase I inhibitor. A set of gene disruption experiments provide insights into the biosynthetic origin of the CPZs and moreover, heterologous expression of the gene cluster allows the generation of novel bioactive derivatives by pathway engineering.     

Intersectin Regulates Dendritic Spine Development and Somatodendritic Endocytosis but Not Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Hippocampal Neurons

Intersectin-short (intersectin-s) is a multimodule scaffolding protein functioning in constitutive and regulated forms of endocytosis in non-neuronal cells and in synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates, alternative splicing generates a second isoform, intersectin-long (intersectin-l), that contains additional modular domains providing a guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42. In mammals, intersectin-s is expressed in multiple tissues and cells, including glia, but excluded from neurons, whereas intersectin-l is a neuron-specific isoform. Thus, intersectin-I may regulate multiple forms of endocytosis in mammalian neurons, including SV endocytosis. We now report, however, that intersectin-l is localized to somatodendritic regions of cultured hippocampal neurons, with some juxtanuclear accumulation, but is excluded from synaptophysin-labeled axon terminals. Consistently, intersectin-l knockdown (KD) does not affect SV recycling. Instead intersectin-l co-localizes with clathrin heavy chain and adaptor protein 2 in the somatodendritic region of neurons, and its KD reduces the rate of transferrin endocytosis. The protein also co-localizes with F-actin at dendritic spines, and intersectin-l KD disrupts spine maturation during development. Our data indicate that intersectin-l is indeed an important regulator of constitutive endocytosis and neuronal development but that it is not a prominent player in the regulated endocytosis of SVs.Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME)⁴ is a major mechanism by which cells take up nutrients, control the surface levels of multiple proteins, including ion channels and transporters, and regulate the coupling of signaling receptors to downstream signaling cascades (1-5). In neurons, CME takes on additional specialized roles; it is an important process regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) availability through endocytosis and recycling of SV membranes (6, 7), it shapes synaptic plasticity (8-10), and it is crucial in maintaining synaptic membranes and membrane structure (11).Numerous endocytic accessory proteins participate in CME, interacting with each other and with core components of the endocytic machinery such as clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) through specific modules and peptide motifs (12). One such module is the Eps15 homology domain that binds to proteins bearing NPF motifs (13, 14). Another is the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, which binds to proline-rich domains in protein partners (15). Intersectin is a multimodule scaffolding protein that interacts with a wide range of proteins, including several involved in CME (16). Intersectin has two N-terminal Eps15 homology domains that are responsible for binding to epsin, SCAMP1, and numb (17-19), a central coil-coiled domain that interacts with Eps15 and SNAP-23 and -25 (17, 20, 21), and five SH3 domains in its C-terminal region that interact with multiple proline-rich domain proteins, including synaptojanin, dynamin, N-WASP, CdGAP, and mSOS (16, 22-25). The rich binding capability of intersectin has linked it to various functions from CME (17, 26, 27) and signaling (22, 28, 29) to mitogenesis (30, 31) and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (23).Intersectin functions in SV recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and C. elegans where it acts as a scaffold, regulating the synaptic levels of endocytic accessory proteins (21, 32-34). In vertebrates, the intersectin gene is subject to alternative splicing, and a longer isoform (intersectin-l) is generated that is expressed exclusively in neurons (26, 28, 35, 36). This isoform has all the binding modules of its short (intersectin-s) counterpart but also has additional domains: a DH and a PH domain that provide guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Cdc42 (23, 37) and a C2 domain at the C terminus. Through its GEF activity and binding to actin regulatory proteins, including N-WASP, intersectin-l has been implicated in actin regulation and the development of dendritic spines (19, 23, 24). In addition, because the rest of the binding modules are shared between intersectin-s and -l, it is generally thought that the two intersectin isoforms have the same endocytic functions. In particular, given the well defined role for the invertebrate orthologs of intersectin-s in SV endocytosis, it is thought that intersectin-l performs this role in mammalian neurons, which lack intersectin-s. Defining the complement of intersectin functional activities in mammalian neurons is particularly relevant given that the protein is involved in the pathophysiology of Down syndrome (DS). Specifically, the intersectin gene is localized on chromosome 21q22.2 and is overexpressed in DS brains (38). Interestingly, alterations in endosomal pathways are a hallmark of DS neurons and neurons from the partial trisomy 16 mouse, Ts65Dn, a model for DS (39, 40). Thus, an endocytic trafficking defect may contribute to the DS disease process.Here, the functional roles of intersectin-l were studied in cultured hippocampal neurons. We find that intersectin-l is localized to the somatodendritic regions of neurons, where it co-localizes with CHC and AP-2 and regulates the uptake of transferrin. Intersectin-l also co-localizes with actin at dendritic spines and disrupting intersectin-l function alters dendritic spine development. In contrast, intersectin-l is absent from presynaptic terminals and has little or no role in SV recycling.     

Mapping Daunorubicin-binding Sites in the ATP-binding Cassette Transporter MsbA Using Site-specific Quenching by Spin Labels

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters transduce the free energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the mechanical work of substrate translocation across cell membranes. MsbA is an ABC transporter implicated in trafficking lipid A across the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. It has sequence similarity and overlapping substrate specificity with multidrug ABC transporters that export cytotoxic molecules in humans and prokaryotes. Despite rapid advances in structure determination of ABC efflux transporters, little is known regarding the location of substrate-binding sites in the transmembrane segment and the translocation pathway across the membrane. In this study, we have mapped residues proximal to the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site in MsbA using site-specific, ATP-dependent quenching of DNR intrinsic fluorescence by spin labels. In the nucleotide-free MsbA intermediate, DNR-binding residues cluster at the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 at a site accessible from the membrane/water interface and extending into an aqueous chamber formed at the interface between the two transmembrane domains. Binding of a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog inverts the transporter to an outward-facing conformation and relieves DNR quenching by spin labels suggesting DNR exclusion from proximity to the spin labels. The simplest model consistent with our data has DNR entering near an elbow helix parallel to the water/membrane interface, partitioning into the open chamber, and then translocating toward the periplasm upon ATP binding.ATP-binding cassette (ABC)² transporters transduce the energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the movement of a wide range of substrates across the cell membranes (1, 2). They constitute the largest family of prokaryotic transporters, import essential cell nutrients, flip lipids, and export toxic molecules (3). Forty eight human ABC transporters have been identified, including ABCB1, or P-glycoprotein, which is implicated in cross-resistance to drugs and cytotoxic molecules (4, 5). Inherited mutations in these proteins are linked to diseases such as cystic fibrosis, persistent hypoglycemia of infancy, and immune deficiency (6).The functional unit of an ABC transporter consists of four modules. Two highly conserved ABCs or nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) bind and hydrolyze ATP to supply the active energy for transport (7). ABCs drive the mechanical work of proteins with diverse functions ranging from membrane transport to DNA repair (3, 5). Substrate specificity is determined by two transmembrane domains (TMDs) that also provide the translocation pathway across the bilayer (7). Bacterial ABC exporters are expressed as monomers, each consisting of one NBD and one TMD, that dimerize to form the active transporter (3). The number of transmembrane helices and their organization differ significantly between ABC importers and exporters reflecting the divergent structural and chemical nature of their substrates (1, 8, 9). Furthermore, ABC exporters bind substrates directly from the cytoplasm or bilayer inner leaflet and release them to the periplasm or bilayer outer leaflet (10, 11). In contrast, bacterial importers have their substrates delivered to the TMD by a dedicated high affinity substrate-binding protein (12).In Gram-negative bacteria, lipid A trafficking from its synthesis site on the inner membrane to its final destination in the outer membrane requires the ABC transporter MsbA (13). Although MsbA has not been directly shown to transport lipid A, suppression of MsbA activity leads to cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid A and inhibits bacterial growth strongly suggesting a role in translocation (14-16). In addition to this role in lipid A transport, MsbA shares sequence similarity with multidrug ABC transporters such as human ABCB1, LmrA of Lactococcus lactis, and Sav1866 of Staphylococcus aureus (16-19). ABCB1, a prototype of the ABC family, is a plasma membrane protein whose overexpression provides resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer cells (1). LmrA and MsbA have overlapping substrate specificity with ABCB1 suggesting that both proteins can function as drug exporters (18, 20). Indeed, cells expressing MsbA confer resistance to erythromycin and ethidium bromide (21). MsbA can be photolabeled with the ABCB1/LmrA substrate azidopine and can transport Hoechst 33342 ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342) across membrane vesicles in an energy-dependent manner (21).The structural mechanics of ABC exporters was revealed from comparison of the MsbA crystal structures in the apo- and nucleotide-bound states as well as from analysis by spin labeling EPR spectroscopy in liposomes (17, 19, 22, 23). The energy harnessed from ATP binding and hydrolysis drives a cycle of NBD association and dissociation that is transmitted to induce reorientation of the TMD from an inward- to outward-facing conformation (17, 19, 22). Large amplitude motion closes the cytoplasmic end of a chamber found at the interface between the two TMDs and opens it to the periplasm (23). These rearrangements lead to significant changes in chamber hydration, which may drive substrate translocation (22).Substrate binding must precede energy input, otherwise the cycle is futile, wasting the energy of ATP hydrolysis without substrate extrusion (7). Consistent with this model, ATP binding reduces ABCB1 substrate affinity, potentially through binding site occlusion (24-26). Furthermore, the TMD substrate-binding event signals the NBD to stimulate ATP hydrolysis increasing transport efficiency (1, 27, 28). However, there is a paucity of information regarding the location of substrate binding, the transport pathway, and the structural basis of substrate recognition by ABC exporters. In vitro studies of MsbA substrate specificity identify a broad range of substrates that stimulate ATPase activity (29). In addition to the putative physiological substrates lipid A and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the ABCB1 substrates Ilmofosine, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342, and verapamil differentially enhance ATP hydrolysis of MsbA (29, 30). Intrinsic MsbA tryptophan (Trp) fluorescence quenching by these putative substrate molecules provides further support of interaction (29).Extensive biochemical analysis of ABCB1 and LmrA provides a general model of substrate binding to ABC efflux exporters. This so-called “hydrophobic cleaner model” describes substrates binding from the inner leaflet of the bilayer and then translocating through the TMD (10, 31, 32). These studies also identified a large number of residues involved in substrate binding and selectivity (33). When these crucial residues are mapped onto the crystal structures of MsbA, a subset of homologous residues clusters to helices 3 and 6 lining the putative substrate pathway (34). Consistent with a role in substrate binding and specificity, simultaneous replacement of two serines (Ser-289 and Ser-290) in helix 6 of MsbA reduces binding and transport of ethidium and taxol, although {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342 and erythromycin interactions remain unaffected (34).The tendency of lipophilic substrates to partition into membranes confounds direct analysis of substrate interactions with ABC exporters (35, 36). Such partitioning may promote dynamic collisions with exposed Trp residues and nonspecific cross-linking in photo-affinity labeling experiments. In this study, we utilize a site-specific quenching approach to identify residues in the vicinity of the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site (37). Although the data on DNR stimulation of ATP hydrolysis is inconclusive (20, 29, 30), the quenching of MsbA Trp fluorescence suggests a specific interaction. Spin labels were introduced along transmembrane helices 3, 4, and 6 of MsbA to assess their ATP-dependent quenching of DNR fluorescence. Residues that quench DNR cluster along the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 consistent with specific binding of DNR. Furthermore, many of these residues are not lipid-exposed but face the putative substrate chamber formed between the two TMDs. These residues are proximal to two Trps, which likely explains the previously reported quenching (29). Our results suggest DNR partitions to the membrane and then binds MsbA in a manner consistent with the hydrophobic cleaner model. Interpretation in the context of the crystal structures of MsbA identifies a putative translocation pathway through the transmembrane segment.     

Analysis of Intracellular Substrates and Products of Thimet Oligopeptidase in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells

Thimet oligopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.15; EP24.15) is an intracellular enzyme that has been proposed to metabolize peptides within cells, thereby affecting antigen presentation and G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction. However, only a small number of intracellular substrates of EP24.15 have been reported previously. Here we have identified over 100 peptides in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells that are derived from intracellular proteins; many but not all of these peptides are substrates or products of EP24.15. First, cellular peptides were extracted from HEK293 cells and incubated in vitro with purified EP24.15. Then the peptides were labeled with isotopic tags and analyzed by mass spectrometry to obtain quantitative data on the extent of cleavage. A related series of experiments tested the effect of overexpression of EP24.15 on the cellular levels of peptides in HEK293 cells. Finally, synthetic peptides that corresponded to 10 of the cellular peptides were incubated with purified EP24.15 in vitro, and the cleavage was monitored by high pressure liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Many of the EP24.15 substrates identified by these approaches are 9–11 amino acids in length, supporting the proposal that EP24.15 can function in the degradation of peptides that could be used for antigen presentation. However, EP24.15 also converts some peptides into products that are 8–10 amino acids, thus contributing to the formation of peptides for antigen presentation. In addition, the intracellular peptides described here are potential candidates to regulate protein interactions within cells.Intracellular protein turnover is a crucial step for cell functioning, and if this process is impaired, the elevated levels of aged proteins usually lead to the formation of intracellular insoluble aggregates that can cause severe pathologies (1). In mammalian cells, most proteins destined for degradation are initially tagged with a polyubiquitin chain in an energy-dependent process and then digested to small peptides by the 26 S proteasome, a large proteolytic complex involved in the regulation of cell division, gene expression, and other key processes (2, 3). In eukaryotes, 30–90% of newly synthesized proteins may be degraded by proteasomes within minutes of synthesis (3, 4). In addition to proteasomes, other extralysosomal proteolytic systems have been reported (5, 6). The proteasome cleaves proteins into peptides that are typically 2–20 amino acids in length (7). In most cases, these peptides are thought to be rapidly hydrolyzed into amino acids by aminopeptidases (8–10). However, some intracellular peptides escape complete degradation and are imported into the endoplasmic reticulum where they associate with major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I)³ molecules and traffic to the cell surface for presentation to the immune system (10–12). Additionally, based on the fact that free peptides added to the intracellular milieu can regulate cellular functions mediated by protein interactions such as gene regulation, metabolism, cell signaling, and protein targeting (13, 14), intracellular peptides generated by proteasomes that escape degradation have been suggested to play a role in regulating protein interactions (15). Indeed, oligopeptides isolated from rat brain tissue using the catalytically inactive EP24.15 (EC 3.4.24.15) were introduced into Chinese hamster ovarian-S and HEK293 cells and were found capable of altering G protein-coupled receptor signal transduction (16). Moreover, EP24.15 overexpression itself changed both angiotensin II and isoproterenol signal transduction, suggesting a physiological function for its intracellular substrates/products (16).EP24.15 is a zinc-dependent peptidase of the metallopeptidase M3 family that contains the HEXXH motif (17). This enzyme was first described as a neuropeptide-degrading enzyme present in the soluble fraction of brain homogenates (18). Whereas EP24.15 can be secreted (19, 20), its predominant location in the cytosol and nucleus suggests that the primary function of this enzyme is not the extracellular degradation of neuropeptides and hormones (21, 22). EP24.15 was shown in vivo to participate in antigen presentation through MHC-I (23–25) and in vitro to bind (26) or degrade (27) some MHC-I associated peptides. EP24.15 has also been shown in vitro to degrade peptides containing 5–17 amino acids produced after proteasome digestion of β-casein (28). EP24.15 shows substrate size restriction to peptides containing from 5 to 17 amino acids because of its catalytic center that is located in a deep channel (29). Despite the size restriction, EP24.15 has a broad substrate specificity (30), probably because a significant portion of the enzyme-binding site is lined with potentially flexible loops that allow reorganization of the active site following substrate binding (29). Recently, it has also been suggested that certain substrates may be cleaved by an open form of EP24.15 (31). This characteristic is supported by the ability of EP24.15 to accommodate different amino acid residues at subsites S4 to S3′, which even includes the uncommon post-proline cleavage (30). Such biochemical and structural features make EP24.15 a versatile enzyme to degrade structurally unrelated oligopeptides.Previously, brain peptides that bound to catalytically inactive EP24.15 were isolated and identified using mass spectrometry (22). The majority of peptides captured by the inactive enzyme were intracellular protein fragments that efficiently interacted with EP24.15; the smallest peptide isolated in these assays contained 5 and the largest 17 amino acids (15, 16, 22, 32), which is within the size range previously reported for natural and synthetic substrates of EP24.15 (18, 30, 33, 34). Interestingly, the peptides released by the proteasome are in the same size range of EP24.15 competitive inhibitors/substrates (7, 35, 36). Taken altogether, these data suggest that in the intracellular environment EP24.15 could further cleave proteasome-generated peptides unrelated to MHC-I antigen presentation (15).Although the mutated inactive enzyme “capture” assay was successful in identifying several cellular protein fragments that were substrates for EP24.15, it also found some interacting peptides that were not substrates. In this study, we used several approaches to directly screen for cellular peptides that were cleaved by EP24.15. The first approach involved the extraction of cellular peptides from the HEK293 cell line, incubation in vitro with purified EP24.15, labeling with isotopic tags, and analysis by mass spectrometry to obtain quantitative data on the extent of cleavage. The second approach examined the effect of EP24.15 overexpression on the cellular levels of peptides in the HEK293 cell line. The third set of experiments tested synthetic peptides with purified EP24.15 in vitro, and examined cleavage by high pressure liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Collectively, these studies have identified a large number of intracellular peptides, including those that likely represent the endogenous substrates and products of EP24.15, and this original information contributes to a better understanding of the function of this enzyme in vivo.