Galectin-8 Induces Apoptosis in Jurkat T Cells by Phosphatidic Acid-mediated ERK1/2 Activation Supported by Protein Kinase A Down-regulation

Galectins have been implicated in T cell homeostasis playing complementary pro-apoptotic roles. Here we show that galectin-8 (Gal-8) is a potent pro-apoptotic agent in Jurkat T cells inducing a complex phospholipase D/phosphatidic acid signaling pathway that has not been reported for any galectin before. Gal-8 increases phosphatidic signaling, which enhances the activity of both ERK1/2 and type 4 phosphodiesterases (PDE4), with a subsequent decrease in basal protein kinase A activity. Strikingly, rolipram inhibition of PDE4 decreases ERK1/2 activity. Thus Gal-8-induced PDE4 activation releases a negative influence of cAMP/protein kinase A on ERK1/2. The resulting strong ERK1/2 activation leads to expression of the death factor Fas ligand and caspase-mediated apoptosis. Several conditions that decrease ERK1/2 activity also decrease apoptosis, such as anti-Fas ligand blocking antibodies. In addition, experiments with freshly isolated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, previously stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28, show that Gal-8 is pro-apoptotic on activated T cells, most likely on a subpopulation of them. Anti-Gal-8 autoantibodies from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus block the apoptotic effect of Gal-8. These results implicate Gal-8 as a novel T cell suppressive factor, which can be counterbalanced by function-blocking autoantibodies in autoimmunity.Glycan-binding proteins of the galectin family have been increasingly studied as regulators of the immune response and potential therapeutic agents for autoimmune disorders (1). To date, 15 galectins have been identified and classified according with the structural organization of their distinctive monomeric or dimeric carbohydrate recognition domain for β-galactosides (2, 3). Galectins are secreted by unconventional mechanisms and once outside the cells bind to and cross-link multiple glycoconjugates both at the cell surface and at the extracellular matrix, modulating processes as diverse as cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (4–10). Several galectins have been involved in T cell homeostasis because of their capability to kill thymocytes, activated T cells, and T cell lines (11–16). Pro-apoptotic galectins might contribute to shape the T cell repertoire in the thymus by negative selection, restrict the immune response by eliminating activated T cells at the periphery (1), and help cancer cells to escape the immune system by eliminating cancer-infiltrating T cells (17). They have also a promising therapeutic potential to eliminate abnormally activated T cells and inflammatory cells (1). Studies on the mostly explored galectins, Gal-1, -3, and -9 (14, 15, 18–20), as well as in Gal-2 (13), suggest immunosuppressive complementary roles inducing different pathways to apoptosis. Galectin-8 (Gal-8)⁴ is one of the most widely expressed galectins in human tissues (21, 22) and cancerous cells (23, 24). Depending on the cell context and mode of presentation, either as soluble stimulus or extracellular matrix, Gal-8 can promote cell adhesion, spreading, growth, and apoptosis (6, 7, 9, 10, 22, 25). Its role has been mostly studied in relation to tumor malignancy (23, 24). However, there is some evidence regarding a role for Gal-8 in T cell homeostasis and autoimmune or inflammatory disorders. For instance, the intrathymic expression and pro-apoptotic effect of Gal-8 upon CD4^highCD8^high thymocytes suggest a role for Gal-8 in shaping the T cell repertoire (16). Gal-8 could also modulate the inflammatory function of neutrophils (26), Moreover Gal-8-blocking agents have been detected in chronic autoimmune disorders (10, 27, 28). In rheumatoid arthritis, Gal-8 has an anti-inflammatory action, promoting apoptosis of synovial fluid cells, but can be counteracted by a specific rheumatoid version of CD44 (CD44vRA) (27). In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a prototypic autoimmune disease, we recently described function-blocking autoantibodies against Gal-8 (10, 28). Thus it is important to define the role of Gal-8 and the influence of anti-Gal-8 autoantibodies in immune cells.In Jurkat T cells, we previously reported that Gal-8 interacts with specific integrins, such as α1β1, α3β1, and α5β1 but not α4β1, and as a matrix protein promotes cell adhesion and asymmetric spreading through activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) (10). These early effects occur within 5–30 min. However, ERK1/2 signaling supports long term processes such as T cell survival or death, depending on the moment of the immune response. During T cell activation, ERK1/2 contributes to enhance the expression of interleukin-2 (IL-2) required for T cell clonal expansion (29). It also supports T cell survival against pro-apoptotic Fas ligand (FasL) produced by themselves and by other previously activated T cells (30, 31). Later on, ERK1/2 is required for activation-induced cell death, which controls the extension of the immune response by eliminating recently activated and restimulated T cells (32, 33). In activation-induced cell death, ERK1/2 signaling contributes to enhance the expression of FasL and its receptor Fas/CD95 (32, 33), which constitute a preponderant pro-apoptotic system in T cells (34). Here, we ask whether Gal-8 is able to modulate the intensity of ERK1/2 signaling enough to participate in long term processes involved in T cell homeostasis.The functional integration of ERK1/2 and PKA signaling (35) deserves special attention. cAMP/PKA signaling plays an immunosuppressive role in T cells (36) and is altered in SLE (37). Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that degrade cAMP release the immunosuppressive action of cAMP/PKA during T cell activation (38, 39). PKA has been described to control the activity of ERK1/2 either positively or negatively in different cells and processes (35). A little explored integration among ERK1/2 and PKA occurs via phosphatidic acid (PA) and PDE signaling. Several stimuli activate phospholipase D (PLD) that hydrolyzes phosphatidylcholine into PA and choline. Such PLD-generated PA plays roles in signaling interacting with a variety of targeting proteins that bear PA-binding domains (40). In this way PA recruits Raf-1 to the plasma membrane (41). It is also converted by phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolase (PAP) activity into diacylglycerol (DAG), which among other functions, recruits and activates the GTPase Ras (42). Both Ras and Raf-1 are upstream elements of the ERK1/2 activation pathway (43). In addition, PA binds to and activates PDEs of the type 4 subfamily (PDE4s) leading to decreased cAMP levels and PKA down-regulation (44). The regulation and role of PA-mediated control of ERK1/2 and PKA remain relatively unknown in T cell homeostasis, because it is also unknown whether galectins stimulate the PLD/PA pathway.Here we found that Gal-8 induces apoptosis in Jurkat T cells by triggering cross-talk between PKA and ERK1/2 pathways mediated by PLD-generated PA. Our results for the first time show that a galectin increases the PA levels, down-regulates the cAMP/PKA system by enhancing rolipram-sensitive PDE activity, and induces an ERK1/2-dependent expression of the pro-apoptotic factor FasL. The enhanced PDE activity induced by Gal-8 is required for the activation of ERK1/2 that finally leads to apoptosis. Gal-8 also induces apoptosis in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), especially after activating T cells with anti-CD3/CD28. Therefore, Gal-8 shares with other galectins the property of killing activated T cells contributing to the T cell homeostasis. The pathway involves a particularly integrated signaling context, engaging PLD/PA, cAMP/PKA, and ERK1/2, which so far has not been reported for galectins. The pro-apoptotic function of Gal-8 also seems to be unique in its susceptibility to inhibition by anti-Gal-8 autoantibodies.     

Interaction of Mint2 with TrkA Is Involved in Regulation of Nerve Growth Factor-induced Neurite Outgrowth

TrkA receptor signaling is essential for nerve growth factor (NGF)-induced survival and differentiation of sensory neurons. To identify possible effectors or regulators of TrkA signaling, yeast two-hybrid screening was performed using the intracellular domain of TrkA as bait. We identified muc18-1-interacting protein 2 (Mint2) as a novel TrkA-binding protein and found that the phosphotyrosine binding domain of Mint2 interacted with TrkA in a phosphorylation- and ligand-independent fashion. Coimmunoprecipitation assays showed that endogenous TrkA interacted with Mint2 in rat tissue homogenates, and immunohistochemical evidence revealed that Mint2 and TrkA colocalized in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. Furthermore, Mint2 overexpression inhibited NGF-induced neurite outgrowth in both PC12 and cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons, whereas inhibition of Mint2 expression by RNA interference facilitated NGF-induced neurite outgrowth. Moreover, Mint2 was found to promote the retention of TrkA in the Golgi apparatus and inhibit its surface sorting. Taken together, our data provide evidence that Mint2 is a novel TrkA-regulating protein that affects NGF-induced neurite outgrowth, possibly through a mechanism involving retention of TrkA in the Golgi apparatus.The neurotrophin family member nerve growth factor (NGF)³ is essential for proper development, patterning, and maintenance of nervous systems (1, 2). NGF has two known receptors; TrkA, a single-pass transmembrane receptor-tyrosine kinase that binds selectively to NGF, and p75, a transmembrane glycoprotein that binds all members of the neurotrophin family (3, 4). NGF binding activates the kinase domain of TrkA, leading to autophosphorylation (5). The resulting phosphotyrosines become docking sites for adaptor proteins involved in signal transduction pathways that lead to the activation of Ras, Rac, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, phospholipase Cγ, and other effectors (2, 6). Many of these TrkA-interacting adaptor proteins have been identified and include, Grb2, APS, SH2B, fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS-2), Shc, and human tumor imaginal disc 1 (TID1) (7-10). The identification of these binding partners has contributed greatly to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the functional diversity of NGF-TrkA signaling.Studies have indicated that the transmission of NGF signaling in neurons involves retrograde transport of NGF-TrkA complexes from the neurite tip to the cell body (11-14). TrkA associates with components of cytoplasmic dynein, and it is thought that vesicular trafficking of neurotrophins occurs via direct interaction of Trk receptors with the dynein motor machinery (14). Furthermore, the atypical protein kinase C-interacting protein, p62, associates with TrkA and plays a novel role in connecting receptor signals with the endosomal signaling network required for mediating TrkA-induced differentiation (15). Recently, the membrane-trafficking protein Pincher has been found to mediate macroendocytosis underlying retrograde signaling by TrkA (16). Despite the progress made to date in understanding Trk complex internalization and trafficking, the mechanisms remain poorly understood.Mint2 (muc18-1-interacting protein 2) belongs to the Mint protein family, which consists of three members, Mint1, Mint2, and Mint3. Mint proteins were first identified as interacting proteins of the synaptic vesicle-docking protein Munc18-1 (17, 18). Mint1 is also sometimes referred to as mLIN-10, as it is the mammalian orthologue of the Caenorhabditis elegans LIN-10 (19). Additionally, Mint1, Mint2, and Mint3 are also referred to as X11α or X11, X11β or X11L (X11-like), and X11γ or X11L2 (X11-like 2), respectively (20). All Mint proteins contain a conserved central phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domain and two contiguous C-terminal PDZ domains (repeated sequences in the brain-specific protein PSD-95, the Drosophila septate junction protein Discs large, and the epithelial tight junction protein ZO-1) (17, 18, 21). Mint1 and Mint2 are expressed only in neuronal tissue (17), whereas Mint3 is ubiquitously expressed (18). Although the function of Mints proteins is not fully clear, their interactions with the docking and exocytosis factors Mun18 -1 and CASK, ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf) GTPases involved in vesicle budding (22), and other synaptic adaptor proteins, such as neurabin-II/spinophilin (23), tamalin (24), and kalirin-7 (25), all suggest possible roles for Mints in synaptic vesicle docking and exocytosis. Mint proteins have also been implicated in the trafficking and/or processing of β-amyloid precursor protein (β-APP). Through their PTB domains, all three Mints bind to a motif within the cytoplasmic domain of β-APP (21, 26-29), and Mint1 and Mint2 can stabilize β-APP, affect β-APP processing, and inhibit the production and secretion of Aβ (28, 30-32). Although the mechanisms by which Mints inhibit β-APP processing are not yet well known, Mints and their binding partners have emerged as potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of Alzheimer disease.To uncover new TrkA-interacting factors and gain insight into the mechanisms that guide TrkA intracellular trafficking and other aspects of TrkA signaling, we conducted a yeast two-hybrid screen of a brain cDNA library using the intracellular domain of TrkA as bait. The screen identified several candidate TrkA-interacting proteins, one of which was Mint2. Follow-up binding assays showed that the PTB domain of Mint2 alone was necessary and sufficient for mediating the interaction with TrkA. Endogenous Mint2 was also coimmunoprecipitated and colocalized with TrkA in rat DRG tissue. Overexpression and knockdown studies showed that Mint2 could significantly inhibit NGF-induced neurite outgrowth in both TrkA-expressing PC12 cells and DRG neurons. Moreover, Mint2 was found to induce the retention of TrkA in the Golgi apparatus and inhibit its surface sorting. Our results suggest that Mint2 is a novel regulator of TrkA receptor signaling.     

Energetic Requirements for Processive Elongation of Actin Filaments by FH1FH2-formins

Formin-homology (FH) 2 domains from formin proteins associate processively with the barbed ends of actin filaments through many rounds of actin subunit addition before dissociating completely. Interaction of the actin monomer-binding protein profilin with the FH1 domain speeds processive barbed end elongation by FH2 domains. In this study, we examined the energetic requirements for fast processive elongation. In contrast to previous proposals, direct microscopic observations of single molecules of the formin Bni1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae labeled with quantum dots showed that profilin is not required for formin-mediated processive elongation of growing barbed ends. ATP-actin subunits polymerized by Bni1p and profilin release the γ-phosphate of ATP on average >2.5 min after becoming incorporated into filaments. Therefore, the release of γ-phosphate from actin does not drive processive elongation. We compared experimentally observed rates of processive elongation by a number of different FH2 domains to kinetic computer simulations and found that actin subunit addition alone likely provides the energy for fast processive elongation of filaments mediated by FH1FH2-formin and profilin. We also studied the role of FH2 structure in processive elongation. We found that the flexible linker joining the two halves of the FH2 dimer has a strong influence on dissociation of formins from barbed ends but only a weak effect on elongation rates. Because formins are most vulnerable to dissociation during translocation along the growing barbed end, we propose that the flexible linker influences the lifetime of this translocative state.Formins are multidomain proteins that assemble unbranched actin filament structures for diverse processes in eukaryotic cells (reviewed in Ref. 1). Formins stimulate nucleation of actin filaments and, in the presence of the actin monomer-binding protein profilin, speed elongation of the barbed ends of filaments (2-6). The ability of formins to influence elongation depends on the ability of single formin molecules to remain bound to a growing barbed end through multiple rounds of actin subunit addition (7, 8). To stay associated during subunit addition, a formin molecule must translocate processively on the barbed end as each actin subunit is added (1, 9-12). This processive elongation of a barbed end by a formin is terminated when the formin dissociates stochastically from the growing end during translocation (4, 10).The formin-homology (FH)² 1 and 2 domains are the best conserved domains of formin proteins (2, 13, 14). The FH2 domain is the signature domain of formins, and in many cases, is sufficient for both nucleation and processive elongation of barbed ends (2-4, 7, 15). Head-to-tail homodimers of FH2 domains (12, 16) encircle the barbed ends of actin filaments (9). In vitro, association of barbed ends with FH2 domains slows elongation by limiting addition of free actin monomers. This “gating” behavior is usually explained by a rapid equilibrium of the FH2-associated end between an open state competent for actin monomer association and a closed state that blocks monomer binding (4, 9, 17).Proline-rich FH1 domains located N-terminal to FH2 domains are required for profilin to stimulate formin-mediated elongation. Individual tracks of polyproline in FH1 domains bind 1:1 complexes of profilin-actin and transfer the actin directly to the FH2-associated barbed end to increase processive elongation rates (4-6, 8, 10, 17).Rates of elongation and dissociation from growing barbed ends differ widely for FH1FH2 fragments from different formin homologs (4). We understand few aspects of FH1FH2 domains that influence gating, elongation or dissociation. In this study, we examined the source of energy for formin-mediated processive elongation, and the influence of FH2 structure on elongation and dissociation from growing ends. In contrast to previous proposals (6, 18), we found that fast processive elongation mediated by FH1FH2-formins is not driven by energy from the release of the γ-phosphate from ATP-actin filaments. Instead, the data show that the binding of an actin subunit to the barbed end provides the energy for processive elongation. We found that in similar polymerizing conditions, different natural FH2 domains dissociate from growing barbed ends at substantially different rates. We further observed that the length of the flexible linker between the subunits of a FH2 dimer influences dissociation much more than elongation.     

Rab1 Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor SidM Is a Major Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate-binding Effector Protein of Legionella pneumophila

The causative agent of Legionnaires disease, Legionella pneumophila, forms a replicative vacuole in phagocytes by means of the intracellular multiplication/defective organelle trafficking (Icm/Dot) type IV secretion system and translocated effector proteins, some of which subvert host GTP and phosphoinositide (PI) metabolism. The Icm/Dot substrate SidC anchors to the membrane of Legionella-containing vacuoles (LCVs) by specifically binding to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P). Using a nonbiased screen for novel L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins, we identified the Rab1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) SidM/DrrA as the predominant PtdIns(4)P-binding protein. Purified SidM specifically and directly bound to PtdIns(4)P, whereas the SidM-interacting Icm/Dot substrate LidA preferentially bound PtdIns(3)P but also PtdIns(4)P, and the L. pneumophila Arf1 GEF RalF did not bind to any PIs. The PtdIns(4)P-binding domain of SidM was mapped to the 12-kDa C-terminal sequence, termed “P4M” (PtdIns4P binding of SidM/DrrA). The isolated P4M domain is largely helical and displayed higher PtdIns(4)P binding activity in the context of the α-helical, monomeric full-length protein. SidM constructs containing P4M were translocated by Icm/Dot-proficient L. pneumophila and localized to the LCV membrane, indicating that SidM anchors to PtdIns(4)P on LCVs via its P4M domain. An L. pneumophila ΔsidM mutant strain displayed significantly higher amounts of SidC on LCVs, suggesting that SidM and SidC compete for limiting amounts of PtdIns(4)P on the vacuole. Finally, RNA interference revealed that PtdIns(4)P on LCVs is specifically formed by host PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ. Thus, L. pneumophila exploits PtdIns(4)P produced by PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ to anchor the effectors SidC and SidM to LCVs.The Gram-negative pathogen Legionella pneumophila is the causative agent of Legionnaires disease, but it evolved as a parasite of various species of environmental predatory protozoa, including the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum (1, 2). The human disease is linked to the inhalation of contaminated aerosols, followed by replication in alveolar macrophages. To accommodate the transfer between host cells, L. pneumophila alternates between replicative and transmissive phases, the regulation of which includes an apparent quorum-sensing system (3–5).In macrophages and amoebae, L. pneumophila forms a replicative compartment, the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV).³ LCVs avoid fusion with lysosomes (6), intercept vesicular traffic at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) exit sites (7), and fuse with the ER (8–10). The uptake of L. pneumophila and formation of LCVs in macrophages and amoebae depends on the Icm/Dot type IV secretion system (T4SS) (11–14). Although more than 100 Icm/Dot substrates (“effector” proteins) have been identified to date, only few are functionally characterized, including effectors that interfere with host cell signal transduction, vesicle trafficking, or apoptotic pathways (15–18).Two Icm/Dot-translocated substrates, SidM/DrrA (19, 20) and RalF (21), have been characterized as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rho subfamily of small GTPases. These bacterial GEFs are recruited to and activate their targets on LCVs. Small GTPases of the Rho subfamily are involved in many eukaryotic signal transduction pathways and in actin cytoskeleton regulation (22). Inactive Rho GTPases bind GDP and a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI). The GTPases are activated by removal of the GDI and the exchange of GDP with GTP by GEFs, which promotes the interaction with downstream effector proteins, such as protein or lipid kinases and various adaptor proteins. The cycle is closed by hydrolysis of the bound GTP, which is mediated by GTPase-activating proteins.SidM is a GEF for Rab1, which is essential for ER to Golgi vesicle transport, and additionally, SidM acts as a GDI displacement factor (GDF) to activate Rab1 (23, 24). The function of SidM is assisted by the Icm/Dot substrate LidA, which also localizes to LCVs. LidA preferentially binds to activated Rab1, thus supporting the recruitment of early secretory vesicles by SidM (19, 20, 23, 25, 26). Another Icm/Dot substrate, LepB (27), contributes to Rab1-mediated membrane cycling by inactivating Rab1 through its GTPase-activating protein function, thus acting as an antagonist of SidM (24).The Icm/Dot substrate RalF recruits and activates the small GTPase ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (Arf1), which is involved in retrograde vesicle transport from Golgi to ER (21). Dominant negative Arf1 (7, 28) or knockdown of Arf1 by RNA interference (29) impairs the formation of LCVs, as well as the recruitment of the Icm/Dot substrate SidC to the LCV (30).SidC and its paralogue SdcA localize to the LCV membrane (31), where the proteins specifically bind to the host cell lipid phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P) (32, 33). Phosphoinositides (PIs) regulate eukaryotic receptor-mediated signal transduction, actin remodeling, and membrane dynamics (34, 35). PtdIns(4)P is present on the cytoplasmic membrane, but localizes preferentially to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), where this PI is produced by an Arf-dependent recruitment of PtdIns(4)P kinase IIIβ (PI4K IIIβ) (36) to promote trafficking along the secretory pathway. Recently, PtdIns(4)P was found to also mediate the export of early secretory vesicles from ER exit sites (37). At present, the L. pneumophila effector proteins that mediate exploitation of host PI signaling remain ill defined.In a nonbiased screen for L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins using different PIs coupled to agarose beads, we identified SidM as a major PtdIns(4)P-binding effector. We mapped its PtdIns(4)P binding activity to a novel P4M domain within a 12-kDa C-terminal sequence. SidM constructs, including the P4M domain, were found to be translocated and bind the LCV membrane, where the levels of PtdIns(4)P are controlled by PI4K IIIβ.     

Long Patch Base Excision Repair Proceeds via Coordinated Stimulation of the Multienzyme DNA Repair Complex

Base excision repair, a major repair pathway in mammalian cells, is responsible for correcting DNA base damage and maintaining genomic integrity. Recent reports show that the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex (9-1-1) stimulates enzymes proposed to perform a long patch-base excision repair sub-pathway (LP-BER), including DNA glycosylases, apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1), DNA polymerase β (pol β), flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), and DNA ligase I (LigI). However, 9-1-1 was found to produce minimal stimulation of FEN1 and LigI in the context of a complete reconstitution of LP-BER. We show here that pol β is a robust stimulator of FEN1 and a moderate stimulator of LigI. Apparently, there is a maximum possible stimulation of these two proteins such that after responding to pol β or another protein in the repair complex, only a small additional response to 9-1-1 is allowed. The 9-1-1 sliding clamp structure must serve primarily to coordinate enzyme actions rather than enhancing rate. Significantly, stimulation by the polymerase involves interaction of primer terminus-bound pol β with FEN1 and LigI. This observation provides compelling evidence that the proposed LP-BER pathway is actually employed in cells. Moreover, this pathway has been proposed to function by sequential enzyme actions in a “hit and run” mechanism. Our results imply that this mechanism is still carried out, but in the context of a multienzyme complex that remains structurally intact during the repair process.The mammalian genome experiences constant stress from both external and internal factors that causes genomic instability. Eukaryotic cells have developed a number of DNA repair pathways that correct DNA damage before it results in permanent chromosomal alteration. Base excision repair (BER)³ is the major pathway responsible for reversing DNA damage sustained by individual nucleotide bases. Mammalian BER is initiated by DNA glycosylases, which recognize structural alteration of a nitrogenous base and excise it leaving an intact sugar-phosphate backbone with an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site (1). AP sites in humans are detected by AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) that cleaves the phosphate backbone of the damaged strand, leaving a nick with a 3′-OH group and a 5′-deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) residue. The dRP-bordered nick is not a substrate for ligation. If the dRP residue is not oxidized or reduced, repair can proceed via a short patch-BER pathway, in which the dRP residue is removed by the 5′-lyase activity of DNA polymerase β (pol β), which concurrently fills in the 1-nt gap, and the resulting nick is sealed by the DNA ligase III-XRCC1 complex (2-4).However, if the oxidative state of the dRP is altered, the lyase activity of pol β is inhibited, but the polymerase activity of pol β can still displace the oxidized or reduced dRP residue into a 2-10-nt 5′ flap intermediate, which will then be cleaved by FEN1 and subsequently joined by LigI (4-7). This process is known as long patch-base excision repair (LP-BER). Recent studies examining the relevance of the two different pathways in vitro predict a predominant role for short patch-BER in the cell as compared with LP-BER (8). Because the cell undergoes constant repair of damaged bases, it is very difficult to assess the relative use of one pathway over the other in vivo. Studies using plasmid DNA containing defined DNA damage have been used as an indirect approach to evaluate the role of the two different BER pathways in cells and the size of the DNA repair patches (9). Results from these studies have shown that repair patches of 6-12 nucleotides are generated during repair of plasmids that contain a single base lesion, at least supporting the existence of LP-BER in vivo.LP-BER has also been proposed to proceed by either a PCNA-dependent sub-pathway involving the use of DNA pol δ/ε or a PCNA-independent sub-pathway that uses only DNA pol β. However, most LP-BER reconstitution experiments in vitro indicate that pol β works more efficiently than pol δ with the other proposed LP-BER proteins. FEN1 is known to stimulate pol β-mediated DNA synthesis on an LP-BER substrate suggesting that these two proteins interact functionally and mechanistically (10). pol β has also been shown to interact with LigI by co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicating that they might be a part of a multiprotein DNA repair complex (11).The heterotrimeric protein complex, Rad9, Rad1, and Hus1 (the 9-1-1 complex), plays a significant role in the early recognition of DNA damage and recruiting appropriate proteins to repair sites. The 9-1-1 complex interacts with several of the proteins involved in the proposed BER pathways, including DNA glycosylases (12-14), APE1 (15), pol β (16), FEN1 (17,18), and LigI (19, 20). In a recent report (15), the 9-1-1 complex was shown to interact both physically and functionally with APE1 and pol β and to stimulate their respective activities. Stimulation of the endonuclease ensures the abasic site is recognized and cleaved off efficiently. Stimulation of nucleotide addition by pol β is expected to promote the LP-BER sub-pathway, as 9-1-1 stimulates the strand displacement activity of pol β, thereby requiring FEN1 flap cleavage before ligation to repair the site of damage. Because 9-1-1 is structurally similar to the sliding clamp PCNA, early studies were focused on determining the effects of 9-1-1 on DNA replication and repair proteins previously shown to be stimulated by PCNA. The 9-1-1 complex has been reported to stimulate both FEN1 cleavage (17, 18) and nick sealing by LigI (20) in vitro. However, the 9-1-1 clamp poorly stimulated FEN1 and LigI in the entire LP-BER-reconstituted system as compared with strong stimulation by 9-1-1 of individual cognate substrates (15). The authors (15) suggest that FEN1 and LigI evolved to respond to stimulation by PCNA and not 9-1-1 during LP-BER. The issue with this explanation is that it does not take into consideration how LP-BER would be efficiently carried out when damage-induced p21 binds and inhibits PCNA (21).To define how 9-1-1 interacts with the components of BER, we have reconstituted the entire LP-BER pathway using purified human enzymes and substrates that simulate an abasic site created after recognition and cleavage of damaged base by a glycosylase. Similar to results of Gembka et al. (15), we observe much less stimulation of either FEN1 or LigI by 9-1-1 in the fully reconstituted system compared with 9-1-1 stimulation of FEN1 on a flap substrate or LigI on a nicked substrate alone. Our subsequent analysis of the protein-protein interactions among the various LP-BER enzymes provides insight into why the 9-1-1 clamp exhibits minimal stimulation in the reconstituted system. Moreover, our mechanistic characterization of the significant role of pol β in mediating the activities of various enzymes in the multiprotein repair complex both explains the behavior of 9-1-1 and strongly suggests the existence of the LP-BER pathway in vivo.     

Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Protein Is a Substrate for the Peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans Isomerase Activity of Cyclophilins A and B

We report here a biochemical and structural characterization of domain 2 of the nonstructural 5A protein (NS5A) from the JFH1 Hepatitis C virus strain and its interactions with cyclophilins A and B (CypA and CypB). Gel filtration chromatography, circular dichroism spectroscopy, and finally NMR spectroscopy all indicate the natively unfolded nature of this NS5A-D2 domain. Because mutations in this domain have been linked to cyclosporin A resistance, we used NMR spectroscopy to investigate potential interactions between NS5A-D2 and cellular CypA and CypB. We observed a direct molecular interaction between NS5A-D2 and both cyclophilins. The interaction surface on the cyclophilins corresponds to their active site, whereas on NS5A-D2, it proved to be distributed over the many proline residues of the domain. NMR heteronuclear exchange spectroscopy yielded direct evidence that many proline residues in NS5A-D2 form a valid substrate for the enzymatic peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase (PPIase) activity of CypA and CypB.Hepatitis C virus (HCV)⁴ is a small, positive strand, RNA-enveloped virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family and the genus Hepacivirus. With 120–180 million chronically infected individuals worldwide, hepatitis C virus infection represents a major cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (1). The HCV viral genome (∼9.6 kb) codes for a unique polyprotein of ∼3000 amino acids (recently reviewed in Refs. 2–4). Following processing via viral and cellular proteases, this polyprotein gives rise to at least 10 viral proteins, divided into structural (core, E1, and E2 envelope glycoproteins) and nonstructural proteins (p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, NS5B). Nonstructural proteins are involved in polyprotein processing and viral replication. The set composed of NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B constitutes the minimal protein component required for viral replication (5).Cyclophilins are cellular proteins that have been identified first as CsA-binding proteins (6). As FK506-binding proteins (FKBP) and parvulins, cyclophilins are peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases (PPIase) that catalyze the cis/trans isomerization of the peptide linkage preceding a proline (6, 7). Several subtypes of cyclophilins are present in mammalian cells (8). They share a high sequence homology and a well conserved three-dimensional structure but display significant differences in their primary cellular localization and in abundance (9). CypA, the most abundant of the cyclophilins, is primarily cytoplasmic, whereas CypB is directed to the endoplasmic reticulum lumen or the secretory pathway. CypD, on the other hand, is the mitochondrial cyclophilin. Cyclophilins are involved in numerous physiological processes such as protein folding, immune response, and apoptosis and also in the replication cycle of viruses including vaccinia virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-coronavirus, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (for review see Ref. 10). For HIV, CypA has been shown to interact with the capsid domain of the HIV Gag precursor polyprotein (11). CypA thereby competes with capsid domain/TRIM5 interaction, resulting in a loss of the antiviral protective effect of the cellular restriction factor TRIM5α (12, 13). Moreover, it has been shown that CypA catalyzes the cis/trans isomerization of Gly²²¹-Pro²²² in the capsid domain and that it has functional consequences for HIV replication efficiency (14–16). For HCV, Watashi et al. (17) have described a molecular and functional interaction between NS5B, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), and cyclophilin B (CypB). CypB may be a key regulator in HCV replication by modulating the affinity of NS5B for RNA. This regulation is abolished in the presence of cyclosporin A (CsA), an inhibitor of cyclophilins (6). These results provided for the first time a molecular mechanism for the early-on observed anti-HCV activity of CsA (18–20). Although this initial report suggests that only CypB would be involved in the HCV replication process (17), a growing number of studies have recently pointed out a role for other cyclophilins (21–25).In vitro selection of CsA-resistant HCV mutants indicated the importance of two HCV nonstructural proteins, NS5B and NS5A (26), with a preponderant effect for mutations in the C-terminal half of NS5A. NS5A is a large phosphoprotein (49 kDa), indispensable for HCV replication and particle assembly (27–29), but for which the exact function(s) in the HCV replication cycle remain to be elucidated. This nonstructural protein is anchored to the cytoplasmic leaflet of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane via an N-terminal amphipathic α-helix (residues 1–27) (30, 31). Its cytoplasmic sequence can be divided into three domains: D1 (residues 27–213), D2 (residues 250–342), and D3 (residues 356–447), all connected by low complexity sequences (32). D1, a zinc-binding domain, adopts a dimeric claw-shaped structure, which is proposed to interact with RNA (33, 34). NS5A-D2 is essential for HCV replication, whereas NS5A-D3 is a key determinant for virus infectious particle assembly (27, 35). NS5A-D2 and -D3, for which sequence conservation among HCV genotypes is significantly lower than for D1, have been proposed to be natively unfolded domains (28, 32). Molecular and structural characterization of NS5A-D2 from HCV genotype 1a has confirmed the disordered nature of this domain (36, 37).As it is still not clear which cyclophilins are cofactors for HCV replication, and as mutations in HCV NS5A protein have been associated with CsA resistance, we decided to examine the interaction between both CypA and CypB and domain 2 of the HCV NS5A protein. We first characterized, at the molecular level, NS5A-D2 from the HCV JFH1 infectious strain (genotype 2a) and showed by NMR spectroscopy that this natively unfolded domain indeed interacts with both cyclophilin A and cyclophilin B. Our NMR chemical shift mapping experiments indicated that the interaction occurs at the level of the cyclophilin active site, whereas it lacks a precise localization on NS5A-D2. A peptide derived from the only well conserved amino acid motif in NS5A-D2 did interact with cyclophilin A but only with a 10-fold lower affinity than the full domain. We concluded from this that the many proline residues form multiple anchoring points, especially when they adopt the cis conformation. NMR exchange spectroscopy further demonstrated that NS5A-D2 is a substrate for the PPIase activities of both CypA and CypB. Both the NS5A/cyclophilin interaction and the PPIase activity of the cyclophilins on NS5A-D2 were abolished by CsA, underscoring the specificity of the interaction.     

Neuroprotective Secreted Amyloid Precursor Protein Acts by Disrupting Amyloid Precursor Protein Dimers

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) is implied both in cell growth and differentiation and in neurodegenerative processes in Alzheimer disease. Regulated proteolysis of APP generates biologically active fragments such as the neuroprotective secreted ectodomain sAPPα and the neurotoxic β-amyloid peptide. Furthermore, it has been suggested that the intact transmembrane APP plays a signaling role, which might be important for both normal synaptic plasticity and neuronal dysfunction in dementia. To understand APP signaling, we tracked single molecules of APP using quantum dots and quantitated APP homodimerization using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy for the detection of Förster resonance energy transfer in living neuroblastoma cells. Using selective labeling with synthetic fluorophores, we show that the dimerization of APP is considerably higher at the plasma membrane than in intracellular membranes. Heparan sulfate significantly contributes to the almost complete dimerization of APP at the plasma membrane. Importantly, this technique for the first time structurally defines the initiation of APP signaling by binding of a relevant physiological extracellular ligand; our results indicate APP as receptor for neuroprotective sAPPα, as sAPPα binding disrupts APP dimers, and this disruption of APP dimers by sAPPα is necessary for the protection of neuroblastoma cells against starvation-induced cell death. Only cells expressing reversibly dimerized wild-type, but not covalently dimerized mutant APP are protected by sAPPα. These findings suggest a potentially beneficial effect of increasing sAPPα production or disrupting APP dimers for neuronal survival.The amyloid precursor protein (APP)⁴ is known both for its important role in the development and plasticity of the nervous system (1–6) and for its involvement in Alzheimer disease (AD) (7, 8). Despite intensive research efforts, the initial events that lead to the prevalent sporadic, i.e. non-familial, forms of AD are still unclear. Furthermore, although a higher gene dose of APP (9) or the presence of pathological APP mutations is sufficient to induce familial AD (for review, see Ref. 10), the exact pathological mechanism that is triggered by APP is still under debate.Some fragments of APP, such as the β-amyloid peptide (Aβ), are thought to contribute to synaptic dysfunction and neurotoxicity (11, 12). On the other hand, the α-secretase-derived extracellular fragment of APP (sAPPα), which is present at lower levels in AD patients than in controls (13), has been shown to be beneficial for memory function, to possess neuroprotective properties, and to counteract the effects of Aβ (14–18).Signaling by transmembrane APP may directly contribute to neurodegeneration in AD (19–24); however, the signal transduction pathway for transmembrane APP remains unknown, although several potential regulatory proteins, glycosaminoglycans, and metal ions are known to bind with high affinity to APP and sAPPα (25, 26). The most common form of signal transduction for single-pass transmembrane proteins is the ligand-induced perturbation of a monomer/dimer equilibrium. Indeed, the dimerization of transmembrane APP has been implied several times in the past. Several studies have investigated the effects of presumed dimer-breaking perturbations on biological read-outs, such as the production of Aβ (27, 28), but without directly measuring the APP aggregation state, or have investigated the aggregation state of APP subdomains, often reconstituted in cell-free systems (27–32). Dimerization interfaces in both the extracellular and the transmembrane domain have been suggested.In the studies investigating the aggregation state of full-length APP, most of the employed methods, such as chemical cross-linking and co-immunoprecipitation, do not lend themselves readily to a rigorous quantitative analysis of the abundance of potentially instable dimers (31, 33), whereas in other cases the use of chimeras may have influenced the dimerization potential or precluded the search for a natural stimulus (23, 34). The only previously reported direct observation of APP dimerization by Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy uses an assay in which the FRET efficiency varies with the level of overexpression (35). Therefore, a concentration-dependent FRET component due to nonspecific stochastic encounters cannot be excluded in this study.Most importantly, as none of the published procedures permitted the selective detection of APP dimers on the surface of live cells, where they would encounter ligands, they could not differentiate between subpopulations of APP. This may be one reason why no natural ligand of APP has ever been shown to signal via modulation of its monomer/dimer equilibrium.Another elusive goal is the identity of the receptor for neuroprotective sAPPα (36–39). The ligand-dependent dimerization of sAPPα in solution (40) and its origination from transmembrane APP suggest that APP might serve as receptor for sAPPα, but this binding has never been experimentally shown.     

Engineered Protein Connectivity to Actin Mimics PDZ-dependent Recycling of G Protein-coupled Receptors but Not Its Regulation by Hrs

Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) recycle after agonist-induced endocytosis by a sequence-dependent mechanism, which is distinct from default membrane flow and remains poorly understood. Efficient recycling of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) requires a C-terminal PDZ (PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (PDZbd), an intact actin cytoskeleton, and is regulated by the endosomal protein Hrs (hepatocyte growth factor-regulated substrate). The PDZbd is thought to link receptors to actin through a series of protein interaction modules present in NHERF/EBP50 (Na⁺/H+ exchanger 3 regulatory factor/ezrin-binding phosphoprotein of 50 kDa) family and ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) family proteins. It is not known, however, if such actin connectivity is sufficient to recapitulate the natural features of sequence-dependent recycling. We addressed this question using a receptor fusion approach based on the sufficiency of the PDZbd to promote recycling when fused to a distinct GPCR, the δ-opioid receptor, which normally recycles inefficiently in HEK293 cells. Modular domains mediating actin connectivity promoted receptor recycling with similarly high efficiency as the PDZbd itself, and recycling promoted by all of the domains was actin-dependent. Regulation of receptor recycling by Hrs, however, was conferred only by the PDZbd and not by downstream interaction modules. These results suggest that actin connectivity is sufficient to mimic the core recycling activity of a GPCR-linked PDZbd but not its cellular regulation.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)² comprise the largest family of transmembrane signaling receptors expressed in animals and transduce a wide variety of physiological and pharmacological information. While these receptors share a common 7-transmembrane-spanning topology, structural differences between individual GPCR family members confer diverse functional and regulatory properties (1-4). A fundamental mechanism of GPCR regulation involves agonist-induced endocytosis of receptors via clathrin-coated pits (4). Regulated endocytosis can have multiple functional consequences, which are determined in part by the specificity with which internalized receptors traffic via divergent downstream membrane pathways (5-7).Trafficking of internalized GPCRs to lysosomes, a major pathway traversed by the δ-opioid receptor (δOR), contributes to proteolytic down-regulation of receptor number and produces a prolonged attenuation of subsequent cellular responsiveness to agonist (8, 9). Trafficking of internalized GPCRs via a rapid recycling pathway, a major route traversed by the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), restores the complement of functional receptors present on the cell surface and promotes rapid recovery of cellular signaling responsiveness (6, 10, 11). When co-expressed in the same cells, the δOR and β2AR are efficiently sorted between these divergent downstream membrane pathways, highlighting the occurrence of specific molecular sorting of GPCRs after endocytosis (12).Recycling of various integral membrane proteins can occur by default, essentially by bulk membrane flow in the absence of lysosomal sorting determinants (13). There is increasing evidence that various GPCRs, such as the β2AR, require distinct cytoplasmic determinants to recycle efficiently (14). In addition to requiring a cytoplasmic sorting determinant, sequence-dependent recycling of the β2AR differs from default recycling in its dependence on an intact actin cytoskeleton and its regulation by the conserved endosomal sorting protein Hrs (hepatocyte growth factor receptor substrate) (11, 14). Compared with the present knowledge regarding protein complexes that mediate sorting of GPCRs to lysosomes (15, 16), however, relatively little is known about the biochemical basis of sequence-directed recycling or its regulation.The β2AR-derived recycling sequence conforms to a canonical PDZ (PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (henceforth called PDZbd), and PDZ-mediated protein association(s) with this sequence appear to be primarily responsible for its endocytic sorting activity (17-20). Fusion of this sequence to the cytoplasmic tail of the δOR effectively re-routes endocytic trafficking of engineered receptors from lysosomal to recycling pathways, establishing the sufficiency of the PDZbd to function as a transplantable sorting determinant (18). The β2AR-derived PDZbd binds with relatively high specificity to the NHERF/EBP50 family of PDZ proteins (21, 22). A well-established biochemical function of NHERF/EBP50 family proteins is to associate integral membrane proteins with actin-associated cytoskeletal elements. This is achieved through a series of protein-interaction modules linking NHERF/EBP50 family proteins to ERM (ezrin-radixin-moesin) family proteins and, in turn, to actin filaments (23-26). Such indirect actin connectivity is known to mediate other effects on plasma membrane organization and function (23), however, and NHERF/EBP50 family proteins can bind to additional proteins potentially important for endocytic trafficking of receptors (23, 25). Thus it remains unclear if actin connectivity is itself sufficient to promote sequence-directed recycling of GPCRs and, if so, if such connectivity recapitulates the normal cellular regulation of sequence-dependent recycling. In the present study, we took advantage of the modular nature of protein connectivity proposed to mediate β2AR recycling (24, 26), and extended the opioid receptor fusion strategy used successfully for identifying diverse recycling sequences in GPCRs (27-29), to address these fundamental questions.Here we show that the recycling activity of the β2AR-derived PDZbd can be effectively bypassed by linking receptors to ERM family proteins in the absence of the PDZbd itself. Further, we establish that the protein connectivity network can be further simplified by fusing receptors to an interaction module that binds directly to actin filaments. We found that bypassing the PDZ-mediated interaction using either domain is sufficient to mimic the ability of the PDZbd to promote efficient, actin-dependent recycling of receptors. Hrs-dependent regulation, however, which is characteristic of sequence-dependent recycling of wild-type receptors, was recapitulated only by the fused PDZbd and not by the proposed downstream interaction modules. These results support a relatively simple architecture of protein connectivity that is sufficient to mimic the core recycling activity of the β2AR-derived PDZbd, but not its characteristic cellular regulation. Given that an increasing number of GPCRs have been shown to bind PDZ proteins that typically link directly or indirectly to cytoskeletal elements (17, 27, 30-32), the present results also suggest that actin connectivity may represent a common biochemical principle underlying sequence-dependent recycling of various GPCRs.     

Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

Overexpression of E-cadherin on Melanoma Cells Inhibits Chemokine-promoted Invasion Involving p190RhoGAP/p120ctn-dependent Inactivation of RhoA

Melanoma cells express the chemokine receptor CXCR4 that confers high invasiveness upon binding to its ligand CXCL12. Melanoma cells at initial stages of the disease show reduction or loss of E-cadherin expression, but recovery of its expression is frequently found at advanced phases. We overexpressed E-cadherin in the highly invasive BRO lung metastatic cell melanoma cell line to investigate whether it could influence CXCL12-promoted cell invasion. Overexpression of E-cadherin led to defective invasion of melanoma cells across Matrigel and type I collagen in response to CXCL12. A decrease in individual cell migration directionality toward the chemokine and reduced adhesion accounted for the impaired invasion. A p190RhoGAP-dependent inhibition of RhoA activation was responsible for the impairment in chemokine-stimulated E-cadherin melanoma transfectant invasion. Furthermore, we show that p190RhoGAP and p120ctn associated predominantly on the plasma membrane of cells overexpressing E-cadherin, and that E-cadherin-bound p120ctn contributed to RhoA inactivation by favoring p190RhoGAP-RhoA association. These results suggest that melanoma cells at advanced stages of the disease could have reduced metastatic potency in response to chemotactic stimuli compared with cells lacking E-cadherin, and the results indicate that p190RhoGAP is a central molecule controlling melanoma cell invasion.Cadherins are a family of Ca²⁺-dependent adhesion molecules that mediate cell-cell contacts and are expressed in most solid tissues providing a tight control of morphogenesis (1, 2). Classical cadherins, such as epithelial (E) cadherin, are found in adherens junctions, forming core protein complexes with β-catenin, α-catenin, and p120 catenin (p120ctn). Both β-catenin and p120ctn directly interact with E-cadherin, whereas α-catenin associates with the complex through its binding to β-catenin, providing a link with the actin cytoskeleton (1, 2). E-cadherin is frequently lost or down-regulated in many human tumors, coincident with morphological epithelial to mesenchymal transition and acquisition of invasiveness (3-6).Although melanoma only accounts for 5% of skin cancers, when metastasis starts, it is responsible for 80% of deaths from skin cancers (7). Melanocytes express E-cadherin (8-10), but melanoma cells at early radial growth phase show a large reduction in the expression of this cadherin, and surprisingly, expression has been reported to be partially recovered by vertical growth phase and metastatic melanoma cells (9, 11, 12).Trafficking of cancer cells from primary tumor sites to intravasation into blood circulation and later to extravasation to colonize distant organs requires tightly regulated directional cues and cell migration and invasion that are mediated by chemokines, growth factors, and adhesion molecules (13). Solid tumor cells express chemokine receptors that provide guidance of these cells to organs where their chemokine ligands are expressed, constituting a homing model resembling the one used by immune cells to exert their immune surveillance functions (14). Most solid cancer cells express CXCR4, a receptor for the chemokine CXCL12 (also called SDF-1), which is expressed in lungs, bone marrow, and liver (15). Expression of CXCR4 in human melanoma has been detected in the vertical growth phase and on regional lymph nodes, which correlated with poor prognosis and increased mortality (16, 17). Previous in vivo experiments have provided evidence supporting a crucial role for CXCR4 in the metastasis of melanoma cells (18).Rho GTPases control the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton during cell migration (19, 20). The activity of Rho GTPases is tightly regulated by guanine-nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs),⁴ which stimulate exchange of bound GDP by GTP, and inhibited by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which promote GTP hydrolysis (21, 22), whereas guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) appear to mediate blocking of spontaneous activation (23). Therefore, cell migration is finely regulated by the balance between GEF, GAP, and GDI activities on Rho GTPases. Involvement of Rho GTPases in cancer is well documented (reviewed in Ref. 24), providing control of both cell migration and growth. RhoA and RhoC are highly expressed in colon, breast, and lung carcinoma (25, 26), whereas overexpression of RhoC in melanoma leads to enhancement of cell metastasis (27). CXCL12 activates both RhoA and Rac1 in melanoma cells, and both GTPases play key roles during invasion toward this chemokine (28, 29).Given the importance of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in melanoma cell invasion and metastasis, in this study we have addressed the question of whether changes in E-cadherin expression on melanoma cells might affect cell invasiveness. We show here that overexpression of E-cadherin leads to impaired melanoma cell invasion to CXCL12, and we provide mechanistic characterization accounting for the decrease in invasion.     

The RIG-I-like Receptor LGP2 Recognizes the Termini of Double-stranded RNA

The RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), RIG-I and MDA5, recognize single-stranded RNA with 5′ triphosphates and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to initiate innate antiviral immune responses. LGP2, a homolog of RIG-I and MDA5 that lacks signaling capability, regulates the signaling of the RLRs. To establish the structural basis of dsRNA recognition by the RLRs, we have determined the 2.0-Å resolution crystal structure of human LGP2 C-terminal domain bound to an 8-bp dsRNA. Two LGP2 C-terminal domain molecules bind to the termini of dsRNA with minimal contacts between the protein molecules. Gel filtration chromatography and analytical ultracentrifugation demonstrated that LGP2 binds blunt-ended dsRNA of different lengths, forming complexes with 2:1 stoichiometry. dsRNA with protruding termini bind LGP2 and RIG-I weakly and do not stimulate the activation of RIG-I efficiently in cells. Surprisingly, full-length LGP2 containing mutations that abolish dsRNA binding retained the ability to inhibit RIG-I signaling.The innate immune response is the first line of defense against invading pathogens; it is the ubiquitous system of defense against microbial infections (1). Toll-like receptors (TLRs)³ and RIG-I (retinoic acid-inducible gene 1)-like receptors (RLRs) play key roles in innate immune response toward viral infection (2-5). Toll-like receptors TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8 sense viral RNA released in the endosome following phagocytosis of the pathogens (6). RIG-I-like receptors RIG-I and MDA5 detect viral RNA from replicating viruses in infected cells (3, 7, 8). Stimulation of these receptors leads to the induction of type I interferons (IFNs) and other proinflammatory cytokines, conferring antiviral activity to the host cells and activating the acquired immune responses (4, 9).RIG-I discriminates between viral and host RNA through specific recognition of the uncapped 5′-triphosphate of single-stranded RNA (5′ ppp ssRNA) generated by viral RNA polymerases (10, 11). In addition, RIG-I also recognizes double-stranded RNA generated during RNA virus replication (7, 12). Transfection of cells with synthetic double-stranded RNA stimulates the activation of RIG-I (13, 14). Synthetic dsRNA mimics, such as polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly(I·C)), can activate MDA5 when introduced into the cytoplasm of cells. Digestion of poly(I·C) with RNase III transforms poly(I·C) from a ligand for MDA5 into a ligand for RIG-I, suggesting that MDA5 recognizes long dsRNA, whereas RIG-I recognizes short dsRNA (15). Studies of RIG-I and MDA5 knock-out mice confirmed the essential roles of these receptors in antiviral immune responses and demonstrated that they sense different sets of RNA viruses (12, 16).RIG-I and MDA5 contain two caspase recruiting domains (CARDs) at their N termini, a DEX(D/H) box RNA helicase domain, and a C-terminal regulatory or repressor domain (CTD). The helicase domain and the CTD are responsible for viral RNA binding, whereas the CARDs are required for signaling (3, 8). The current model of RIG-I activation suggests that under resting conditions RIG-I is in a suppressed conformation, and viral RNA binding triggers a conformation change that leads to the exposure of the CARDs for the recruitment of the downstream protein IPS-1 (also known as MAVS, Cardif, or VISA) (14, 17). Limited proteolysis of the RIG-I·dsRNA complex showed that RIG-I residues 792-925 of the CTD are involved in dsRNA and 5′ ppp ssRNA binding (14). The CTD of RIG-I overlaps with the C terminus of the previously identified repressor domain (18). The structures of RIG-I and LGP2 (laboratory of genetics and physiology 2) CTD in isolation have been determined by x-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy (14, 19, 20). A large, positively charged surface on RIG-I recognizes the 5′ triphosphate group of viral ssRNA (14, 19). RNA binding studies by titrating RIG-I CTD with dsRNA and 5′ ppp ssRNA suggested that overlapping sets of residues on this charged surface are involved in RNA binding (14). Mutagenesis of several positively charged residues on this surface either reduces or disrupts RNA binding by RIG-I, and these mutations also affect the induction of IFN-β in vivo (14, 19). However, the exact nature of how the RLRs recognize viral RNA and how RNA binding activates these receptors remains to be established.LGP2 is a homolog of RIG-I and MDA5 that lacks the CARDs and thus has no signaling capability (21, 22). The expression of LGP2 is inducible by dsRNA or IFN treatment as well as virus infection (21). Overexpression of LGP2 inhibits Sendai virus and Newcastle disease virus signaling (21). When coexpressed with RIG-I, LGP2 can inhibit RIG-I signaling through the interaction of its CTD with the CARD and the helicase domain of RIG-I (18). LGP2 could suppress RIG-I signaling by three possible ways (23): 1) binding RNA with high affinity, thereby sequestering RNA ligands from RIG-I; 2) interacting directly with RIG-I to block the assembly of the signaling complex; and 3) competing with IKKi (IκB kinase ε) in the NF-κB signaling pathway for a common binding site on IPS-1. To elucidate the structural basis of dsRNA recognition by the RLRs, we have crystallized human LGP2 CTD (residues 541-678) bound to an 8-bp double-stranded RNA and determined the structure of the complex at 2.0 Å resolution. The structure revealed that LGP2 CTD binds to the termini of dsRNA. Mutagenesis and functional studies showed that dsRNA binding is likely not required for the inhibition of RIG-I signaling by LGP2.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Specific Activation of mTORC1 by Rheb G-protein in Vitro Involves Enhanced Recruitment of Its Substrate Protein

Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand, the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42 did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition, the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins (1). We have shown that Rheb proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human (2). Although yeast and fruit fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1) (2). Structurally, these proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide binding (1, 3, 4). Rheb proteins have a conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras (1). The effector domain required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and its adjacent sequences (1, 5). Structural analysis by x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues 35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange (6). In addition, all Rheb proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins are farnesylated (7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions (10–14). Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a GTPase-activating protein for Rheb (15–19). Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional domain for the down-regulation of Rheb (20). Mutations in the Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts of the body as well as neurological symptoms (21, 22). Overexpression of Rheb results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients (15, 16). Two mTOR complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified (23, 24). Whereas mTORC1 is involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2 (25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex (26–28). Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was reported (29). Rheb has been shown to interact with mTOR (27, 30), and this may involve direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR (27). However, this Rheb/mTOR interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP bound to Rheb (27, 28). Recently, a different model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein 38) mediates the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed (31, 32). In this model, FKBP38 binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent reports dispute this idea (33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR.     

Oligomeric Structure of the Human Reduced Folate Carrier: IDENTIFICATION OF HOMO-OLIGOMERS AND DOMINANT-NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON CARRIER EXPRESSION AND FUNCTION*

The ubiquitously expressed reduced folate carrier (RFC) is the major transport system for folate cofactors in mammalian cells and tissues. Previous considerations of RFC structure and mechanism were based on the notion that RFC monomers were sufficient to mediate transport of folate and antifolate substrates. The present study examines the possibility that human RFC (hRFC) exists as higher order homo-oligomers. By chemical cross-linking, transiently expressed hRFC in hRFC-null HeLa (R5) cells with the homobifunctional cross-linker 1,3-propanediyl bis-methanethiosulfonate and Western blotting, hRFC species with molecular masses of hRFC homo-oligomers were identified. Hemagglutinin- and Myc epitope-tagged hRFC proteins expressed in R5 cells were co-immunoprecipitated from both membrane particulate and surface-enriched membrane fractions, indicating that oligomeric hRFC is expressed at the cell surface. By co-expression of wild type and inactive mutant S138C hRFCs, combined with surface biotinylation and confocal microscopy, a dominant-negative phenotype was demonstrated involving greatly decreased cell surface expression of both mutant and wild type carrier caused by impaired intracellular trafficking. For another hRFC mutant (R373A), expression of oligomeric wild type-mutant hRFC was accompanied by a significant and disproportionate loss of wild type activity unrelated to the level of surface carrier. Collectively, our results demonstrate the existence of hRFC homo-oligomers. They also establish the likely importance of these higher order hRFC structures to intracellular trafficking and carrier function.Folates are members of the B class of vitamins that are required for the synthesis of nucleotide precursors, serine, and methionine in one-carbon transfer reactions (1). Because mammals cannot synthesize folates de novo, cellular uptake of these derivatives is essential for cell growth and tissue regeneration (2, 3). Folates are hydrophilic anionic molecules that do not cross biological membranes by diffusion alone, so it is not surprising that sophisticated membrane transport systems have evolved to facilitate their accumulation by mammalian cells.The ubiquitously expressed reduced folate carrier (RFC)² is widely considered to be the major transport system for folate co-factors in mammalian cells and tissues (3, 4). RFC plays a generalized role in folate transport and provides specialized tissue functions such as transport across the basolateral membrane of renal proximal tubules (5), transplacental transport of folates (6), and folate transport across the blood-brain barrier (7), although the contribution of RFC to intestinal absorption of folates remains controversial (8, 9). Loss of RFC expression or function portends potentially profound physiologic and developmental consequences associated with folate deficiency (10). RFC is also a major transporter of antifolate drugs used for cancer chemotherapy such as methotrexate (Mtx), pemetrexed, and raltitrexed (4). Loss of RFC expression or synthesis of mutant RFC protein in tumor cells results in antifolate resistance caused by incomplete inhibition of cellular enzyme targets and low levels of antifolate substrate for polyglutamate synthesis (4, 11).Reflecting its particular physiologic and pharmacologic importance, interest in RFC structure and function has been high. Since 1994, when murine RFC was first cloned (12), application of state-of-the-art molecular biology and biochemistry methods for characterizing polytopic membrane proteins has led to a progressively detailed picture of the molecular structure of the carrier, including its membrane topology, N-glycosylation, functionally or structurally important domains and amino acids, and packing of α-helix transmembrane domains (TMDs) (4, 13). Although no crystal structure for RFC has yet been reported, a detailed homology model for human RFC (hRFC) based on the bacterial lactose/proton symporter LacY and glycerol 3-phosphate/inorganic phosphate antiporter GlpT was generated (13, 14) that permits testing of hypotheses related to hRFC structure and mechanism in a manner not previously possible.Considerations of hRFC structure and mechanism to date have all been based on the notion that a single 591-amino acid hRFC molecule is sufficient to mediate concentrative uptake of folate and antifolate substrates. However, a growing literature suggests that quaternary structure involving the formation of higher order oligomers (e.g. dimers, tetramers, etc.) is commonly an important feature of the structure and function of many membrane transporters (15-18). For major facilitator superfamily proteins, both monomeric (e.g. LacY, GlpT, UhpT, and GLUT3) (19-22) and oligomeric (e.g. LacS, AE1, GLUT1, and TetA) (23-28) structures have been reported, establishing the lack of a clear structural consensus for these related proteins.In this report, we explore the question of whether hRFC exists as a homo-oligomeric species composed of multiple hRFC monomers. Based on results with an assortment of biochemical methods with wt and a collection of mutant hRFC proteins, we not only demonstrate the existence of oligomeric hRFC but also establish the probable importance of these higher order structures to intracellular trafficking and carrier function.     

Structural and Mechanistic Insights into Lunatic Fringe from a Kinetic Analysis of Enzyme Mutants

The Notch receptor is critical for proper development where it orchestrates numerous cell fate decisions. The Fringe family of β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases are regulators of this pathway. Fringe enzymes add N-acetylglucosamine to O-linked fucose on the epidermal growth factor repeats of Notch. Here we have analyzed the reaction catalyzed by Lunatic Fringe (Lfng) in detail. A mutagenesis strategy for Lfng was guided by a multiple sequence alignment of Fringe proteins and solutions from docking an epidermal growth factor-like O-fucose acceptor substrate onto a homology model of Lfng. We targeted three main areas as follows: residues that could help resolve where the fucose binds, residues in two conserved loops not observed in the published structure of Manic Fringe, and residues predicted to be involved in UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) donor specificity. We utilized a kinetic analysis of mutant enzyme activity toward the small molecule acceptor substrate 4-nitrophenyl-α-l-fucopyranoside to judge their effect on Lfng activity. Our results support the positioning of O-fucose in a specific orientation to the catalytic residue. We also found evidence that one loop closes off the active site coincident with, or subsequent to, substrate binding. We propose a mechanism whereby the ordering of this short loop may alter the conformation of the catalytic aspartate. Finally, we identify several residues near the UDP-GlcNAc-binding site, which are specifically permissive toward UDP-GlcNAc utilization.Defects in Notch signaling have been implicated in numerous human diseases, including multiple sclerosis (1), several forms of cancer (2-4), cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with sub-cortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (5), and spondylocostal dysostosis (SCD)³ (6-8). The transmembrane Notch signaling receptor is activated by members of the DSL (Delta, Serrate, Lag2) family of ligands (9, 10). In the endoplasmic reticulum, O-linked fucose glycans are added to the epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats of the Notch extracellular domain by protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 (11-13). These O-fucose monosaccharides can be elongated in the Golgi apparatus by three highly conserved β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases of the Fringe family (Lunatic (Lfng), Manic (Mfng), and Radical Fringe (Rfng) in mammals) (14-16). The formation of this GlcNAc-β1,3-Fuc-α1, O-serine/threonine disaccharide is necessary and sufficient for subsequent elongation to a tetrasaccharide (15, 19), although elongation past the disaccharide in Drosophila is not yet clear (20, 21). Elongation of O-fucose by Fringe is known to potentiate Notch signaling from Delta ligands and inhibit signaling from Serrate ligands (22). Delta ligands are termed Delta-like (Delta-like1, -2, and -4) in mammals, and the homologs of Serrate are known as Jagged (Jagged1 and -2) in mammals. The effects of Fringe on Drosophila Notch can be recapitulated in Notch ligand in vitro binding assays using purified components, suggesting that the elongation of O-fucose by Fringe alters the binding of Notch to its ligands (21). Although Fringe also appears to alter Notch-ligand interactions in mammals, the effects of elongation of the glycan past the O-fucose monosaccharide is more complicated and appears to be cell type-, receptor-, and ligand-dependent (for a recent review see Ref. 23).The Fringe enzymes catalyze the transfer of GlcNAc from the donor substrate UDP-α-GlcNAc to the acceptor fucose, forming the GlcNAc-β1,3-Fuc disaccharide (14-16). They belong to the GT-A-fold of inverting glycosyltransferases, which includes N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I and β1,4-galactosyltransferase I (17, 18). The mechanism is presumed to proceed through the abstraction of a proton from the acceptor substrate by a catalytic base (Asp or Glu) in the active site. This creates a nucleophile that attacks the anomeric carbon of the nucleotide-sugar donor, inverting its configuration from α (on the nucleotide sugar) to β (in the product) (24, 25). The enzyme then releases the acceptor substrate modified with a disaccharide and UDP. The Mfng structure (26) leaves little doubt as to the identity of the catalytic residue, which in all likelihood is aspartate 289 in mouse Lfng (we will use numbering for mouse Lunatic Fringe throughout, unless otherwise stated). The structure of Mfng with UDP-GlcNAc soaked into the crystals (26) showed density only for the UDP portion of the nucleotide-sugar donor and no density for two loops flanking either side of the active site. The presence of flexible loops that become ordered upon substrate binding is a common observation with glycosyltransferases in the GT-A fold family (18, 25). Density for the entire donor was observed in the structure of rabbit N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (27). In this case, ordering of a previously disordered loop upon UDP-GlcNAc binding may have contributed to increased stability of the donor. In the case of bovine β1,4-galactosyltransferase I, a section of flexible random coil from the apo-structure was observed to change its conformation to α-helical upon donor substrate binding (28). Both loops in Lfng are highly conserved, and we have mutated a number of residues in each to test the hypothesis that they interact with the substrates. The mutagenesis strategy was also guided by docking of an EGF-O-fucose acceptor substrate into the active site of the Lfng model as well as comparison of the Lfng model with a homology model of the β1,3-glucosyltransferase (β3GlcT) that modifies O-fucose on thrombospondin type 1 repeats (29, 30). The β3GlcT is predicted to be a GT-A fold enzyme related to the Fringe family (17, 18, 29).