Specific Activation of mTORC1 by Rheb G-protein in Vitro Involves Enhanced Recruitment of Its Substrate Protein

Rheb G-protein plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling pathway by activating mTORC1. The activation of mTORC1 by Rheb can be faithfully reproduced in vitro by using mTORC1 immunoprecipitated by the use of anti-raptor antibody from mammalian cells starved for nutrients. The low in vitro kinase activity against 4E-BP1 of this mTORC1 preparation is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. On the other hand, the addition of Rheb does not activate mTORC2 immunoprecipitated from mammalian cells by the use of anti-rictor antibody. The activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb, because other G-proteins such as KRas, RalA/B, and Cdc42 did not activate mTORC1. Both Rheb1 and Rheb2 activate mTORC1. In addition, the activation is dependent on the presence of bound GTP. We also find that the effector domain of Rheb is required for the mTORC1 activation. FKBP38, a recently proposed mediator of Rheb action, appears not to be involved in the Rheb-dependent activation of mTORC1 in vitro, because the preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of FKBP38 is still activated by Rheb. The addition of Rheb results in a significant increase of binding of the substrate protein 4E-BP1 to mTORC1. PRAS40, a TOR signaling (TOS) motif-containing protein that competes with the binding of 4EBP1 to mTORC1, inhibits Rheb-induced activation of mTORC1. A preparation of mTORC1 that is devoid of raptor is not activated by Rheb. Rheb does not induce autophosphorylation of mTOR. These results suggest that Rheb induces alteration in the binding of 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 to regulate mTORC1 activation.Rheb defines a unique member of the Ras superfamily G-proteins (1). We have shown that Rheb proteins are conserved and are found from yeast to human (2). Although yeast and fruit fly have one Rheb, mouse and human have two Rheb proteins termed Rheb1 (or simply Rheb) and Rheb2 (RhebL1) (2). Structurally, these proteins contain G1-G5 boxes, short stretches of amino acids that define the function of the Ras superfamily G-proteins including guanine nucleotide binding (1, 3, 4). Rheb proteins have a conserved arginine at residue 15 that corresponds to residue 12 of Ras (1). The effector domain required for the binding with downstream effectors encompasses the G2 box and its adjacent sequences (1, 5). Structural analysis by x-ray crystallography further shows that the effector domain is exposed to solvent, is located close to the phosphates of GTP especially at residues 35–38, and undergoes conformational change during GTP/GDP exchange (6). In addition, all Rheb proteins end with the CAAX (C is cysteine, A is an aliphatic amino acid, and X is the C-terminal amino acid) motif that signals farnesylation. In fact, we as well as others have shown that these proteins are farnesylated (7–9).Rheb plays critical roles in the TSC/Rheb/mTOR signaling, a signaling pathway that plays central roles in regulating protein synthesis and growth in response to nutrient, energy, and growth conditions (10–14). Rheb is down-regulated by a TSC1·TSC2 complex that acts as a GTPase-activating protein for Rheb (15–19). Recent studies established that the GAP domain of TSC2 defines the functional domain for the down-regulation of Rheb (20). Mutations in the Tsc1 or Tsc2 gene lead to tuberous sclerosis whose symptoms include the appearance of benign tumors called hamartomas at different parts of the body as well as neurological symptoms (21, 22). Overexpression of Rheb results in constitutive activation of mTOR even in the absence of nutrients (15, 16). Two mTOR complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2, have been identified (23, 24). Whereas mTORC1 is involved in protein synthesis activation mediated by S6K and 4EBP1, mTORC2 is involved in the phosphorylation of Akt in response to insulin. It has been suggested that Rheb is involved in the activation of mTORC1 but not mTORC2 (25).Although Rheb is clearly involved in the activation of mTOR, the mechanism of activation has not been established. We as well as others have suggested a model that involves the interaction of Rheb with the TOR complex (26–28). Rheb activation of mTOR kinase activity using immunoprecipitated mTORC1 was reported (29). Rheb has been shown to interact with mTOR (27, 30), and this may involve direct interaction of Rheb with the kinase domain of mTOR (27). However, this Rheb/mTOR interaction is a weak interaction and is not dependent on the presence of GTP bound to Rheb (27, 28). Recently, a different model proposing that FKBP38 (FK506-binding protein 38) mediates the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb was proposed (31, 32). In this model, FKBP38 binds mTOR and negatively regulates mTOR activity, and this negative regulation is blocked by the binding of Rheb to FKBP38. However, recent reports dispute this idea (33).To further characterize Rheb activation of mTOR, we have utilized an in vitro system that reproduces activation of mTORC1 by the addition of recombinant Rheb. We used mTORC1 immunoprecipitated from nutrient-starved cells using anti-raptor antibody and have shown that its kinase activity against 4E-BP1 is dramatically increased by the addition of recombinant Rheb. Importantly, the activation of mTORC1 is specific to Rheb and is dependent on the presence of bound GTP as well as an intact effector domain. FKBP38 is not detected in our preparation and further investigation suggests that FKBP38 is not an essential component for the activation of mTORC1 by Rheb. Our study revealed that Rheb enhances the binding of a substrate 4E-BP1 with mTORC1 rather than increasing the kinase activity of mTOR.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Rab1 Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor SidM Is a Major Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate-binding Effector Protein of Legionella pneumophila

The causative agent of Legionnaires disease, Legionella pneumophila, forms a replicative vacuole in phagocytes by means of the intracellular multiplication/defective organelle trafficking (Icm/Dot) type IV secretion system and translocated effector proteins, some of which subvert host GTP and phosphoinositide (PI) metabolism. The Icm/Dot substrate SidC anchors to the membrane of Legionella-containing vacuoles (LCVs) by specifically binding to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P). Using a nonbiased screen for novel L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins, we identified the Rab1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) SidM/DrrA as the predominant PtdIns(4)P-binding protein. Purified SidM specifically and directly bound to PtdIns(4)P, whereas the SidM-interacting Icm/Dot substrate LidA preferentially bound PtdIns(3)P but also PtdIns(4)P, and the L. pneumophila Arf1 GEF RalF did not bind to any PIs. The PtdIns(4)P-binding domain of SidM was mapped to the 12-kDa C-terminal sequence, termed “P4M” (PtdIns4P binding of SidM/DrrA). The isolated P4M domain is largely helical and displayed higher PtdIns(4)P binding activity in the context of the α-helical, monomeric full-length protein. SidM constructs containing P4M were translocated by Icm/Dot-proficient L. pneumophila and localized to the LCV membrane, indicating that SidM anchors to PtdIns(4)P on LCVs via its P4M domain. An L. pneumophila ΔsidM mutant strain displayed significantly higher amounts of SidC on LCVs, suggesting that SidM and SidC compete for limiting amounts of PtdIns(4)P on the vacuole. Finally, RNA interference revealed that PtdIns(4)P on LCVs is specifically formed by host PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ. Thus, L. pneumophila exploits PtdIns(4)P produced by PtdIns 4-kinase IIIβ to anchor the effectors SidC and SidM to LCVs.The Gram-negative pathogen Legionella pneumophila is the causative agent of Legionnaires disease, but it evolved as a parasite of various species of environmental predatory protozoa, including the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum (1, 2). The human disease is linked to the inhalation of contaminated aerosols, followed by replication in alveolar macrophages. To accommodate the transfer between host cells, L. pneumophila alternates between replicative and transmissive phases, the regulation of which includes an apparent quorum-sensing system (3–5).In macrophages and amoebae, L. pneumophila forms a replicative compartment, the Legionella-containing vacuole (LCV).³ LCVs avoid fusion with lysosomes (6), intercept vesicular traffic at endoplasmic reticulum (ER) exit sites (7), and fuse with the ER (8–10). The uptake of L. pneumophila and formation of LCVs in macrophages and amoebae depends on the Icm/Dot type IV secretion system (T4SS) (11–14). Although more than 100 Icm/Dot substrates (“effector” proteins) have been identified to date, only few are functionally characterized, including effectors that interfere with host cell signal transduction, vesicle trafficking, or apoptotic pathways (15–18).Two Icm/Dot-translocated substrates, SidM/DrrA (19, 20) and RalF (21), have been characterized as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rho subfamily of small GTPases. These bacterial GEFs are recruited to and activate their targets on LCVs. Small GTPases of the Rho subfamily are involved in many eukaryotic signal transduction pathways and in actin cytoskeleton regulation (22). Inactive Rho GTPases bind GDP and a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI). The GTPases are activated by removal of the GDI and the exchange of GDP with GTP by GEFs, which promotes the interaction with downstream effector proteins, such as protein or lipid kinases and various adaptor proteins. The cycle is closed by hydrolysis of the bound GTP, which is mediated by GTPase-activating proteins.SidM is a GEF for Rab1, which is essential for ER to Golgi vesicle transport, and additionally, SidM acts as a GDI displacement factor (GDF) to activate Rab1 (23, 24). The function of SidM is assisted by the Icm/Dot substrate LidA, which also localizes to LCVs. LidA preferentially binds to activated Rab1, thus supporting the recruitment of early secretory vesicles by SidM (19, 20, 23, 25, 26). Another Icm/Dot substrate, LepB (27), contributes to Rab1-mediated membrane cycling by inactivating Rab1 through its GTPase-activating protein function, thus acting as an antagonist of SidM (24).The Icm/Dot substrate RalF recruits and activates the small GTPase ADP-ribosylation factor 1 (Arf1), which is involved in retrograde vesicle transport from Golgi to ER (21). Dominant negative Arf1 (7, 28) or knockdown of Arf1 by RNA interference (29) impairs the formation of LCVs, as well as the recruitment of the Icm/Dot substrate SidC to the LCV (30).SidC and its paralogue SdcA localize to the LCV membrane (31), where the proteins specifically bind to the host cell lipid phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PtdIns(4)P) (32, 33). Phosphoinositides (PIs) regulate eukaryotic receptor-mediated signal transduction, actin remodeling, and membrane dynamics (34, 35). PtdIns(4)P is present on the cytoplasmic membrane, but localizes preferentially to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), where this PI is produced by an Arf-dependent recruitment of PtdIns(4)P kinase IIIβ (PI4K IIIβ) (36) to promote trafficking along the secretory pathway. Recently, PtdIns(4)P was found to also mediate the export of early secretory vesicles from ER exit sites (37). At present, the L. pneumophila effector proteins that mediate exploitation of host PI signaling remain ill defined.In a nonbiased screen for L. pneumophila PI-binding proteins using different PIs coupled to agarose beads, we identified SidM as a major PtdIns(4)P-binding effector. We mapped its PtdIns(4)P binding activity to a novel P4M domain within a 12-kDa C-terminal sequence. SidM constructs, including the P4M domain, were found to be translocated and bind the LCV membrane, where the levels of PtdIns(4)P are controlled by PI4K IIIβ.     

VCP Mutations Causing Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Disrupt Localization of TDP-43 and Induce Cell Death

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease of bone is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the VCP (valosin-containing protein) gene. The disease is characterized neuropathologically by frontal and temporal lobar atrophy, neuron loss and gliosis, and ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U), which are distinct from those seen in other sporadic and familial FTLD-U entities. The major component of the ubiquitinated inclusions of FTLD with VCP mutation is TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa). TDP-43 proteinopathy links sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, sporadic FTLD-U, and most familial forms of FTLD-U. Understanding the relationship between individual gene defects and pathologic TDP-43 will facilitate the characterization of the mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration. Using cell culture models, we have investigated the role of mutant VCP in intracellular trafficking, proteasomal function, and cell death and demonstrate that mutations in the VCP gene 1) alter localization of TDP-43 between the nucleus and cytosol, 2) decrease proteasome activity, 3) induce endoplasmic reticulum stress, 4) increase markers of apoptosis, and 5) impair cell viability. These results suggest that VCP mutation-induced neurodegeneration is mediated by several mechanisms.Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)² accounts for 10% of all late onset dementias and is the third most frequent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and dementia with Lewy bodies (1). FTLD with ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions is genetically, clinically, and neuropathologically heterogeneous (2, 3). FTLD-U comprises several distinct entities, including sporadic forms and familial cases caused by mutations in the genes encoding VCP (valosin-containing protein), GRN (progranulin), CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B), TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa) and an unknown gene linked to chromosome 9 (2, 3). Frontotemporal dementia with inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease of bone is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the VCP gene located on chromosome 9p13-p12 (4-10) (Fig. 1). This multisystem disease is characterized by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, increased osteoclastic bone resorption, and early onset frontotemporal dementia, also called FTLD (9, 11). Mutations in VCP are also associated with dilatative cardiomyopathy with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (12). Neuropathologic features of FTLD with VCP mutation include frontal and temporal lobar atrophy, neuron loss and gliosis, and ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U). The majority of aggregates are ubiquitin- and TDP-43-positive neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NIIs); a smaller proportion is made up of TDP-43-immunoreactive dystrophic neurites (DNs) and neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (NCIs). A small number of inclusions are VCP-immunoreactive (5, 13). Pathologic TDP-43 in inclusions links a spectrum of diseases in which TDP-43 pathology is a primary feature, including FTLD-U, motor neuron disease, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, FTLD with motor neuron disease, and inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease of bone, as well as an expanding spectrum of other disorders in which TDP-43 pathology is secondary (14, 15).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Model of pathogenic mutations and domains in valosin-containing protein. CDC48 (magenta), located within the N terminus (residues 22-108), binds the following cofactors: p47, gp78, and Npl4-Ufd1 (23-25, 28). There are two AAA-ATPase domains (AAA; blue) at residues 240-283 and 516-569, which are joined by two linker regions (L1 and L2; red).TDP-43 proteinopathy in FTLD with VCP mutation has a biochemical signature similar to that seen in other sporadic and familial cases of FTLD-U, including sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, FTLD-motor neuron disease, FTLD with progranulin (GRN) mutation, and FTLD linked to chromosome 9p (3, 16). TDP-43 proteinopathy in these disorders is characterized by hyperphosphorylation of TDP-43, ubiquitination, and cleavage to form C-terminal fragments detected only in insoluble brain extracts from affected brain regions (16). Identification of TDP-43 as the major component of the ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions of FTLD with VCP mutation supports the hypothesis that VCP gene mutations cause an alteration of VCP function, leading to TDP-43 proteinopathy.VCP/p97 (valosin-containing protein) is a member of the AAA (ATPase associated with diverse cellular activities) superfamily. The N-terminal domain of VCP has been shown to be involved in cofactor binding (CDC48 (cell division cycle protein 48)) and two AAA-ATPase domains that form a hexameric complex (Fig. 1) (17). Recently, it has been shown that the N-terminal domain of VCP binds phosphoinositides (18, 19). AKT (activated serine-threonine protein kinase) phosphorylates VCP and is required for constitutive VCP function (20, 21). AKT is activated through phospholipid binding and phosphorylation via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathway, which is involved in cell survival (22). The lipid binding domain may recruit VCP to the cell membrane where it is phosphorylated by AKT (19).The diversity of VCP functions is modulated, in part, by a variety of intracellular cofactors, including p47, gp78, and Npl4-Ufd1 (23). Cofactor p47 has been shown to play a role in the maintenance and biogenesis of both the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus (24). The structure of p47 contains a ubiquitin regulatory X domain that binds the N-terminus of VCP, and together they act as a chaperone to deliver membrane fusion machinery to the site of adjacent membranes (25). The function of the p47-VCP complex is dependent upon cell division cycle 2 (CDC2) serine-threonine kinase phosphorylation of p47 (26, 27). Also, VCP has been found to interact with the cytosolic tail of gp78, an ER membrane-spanning E3 ubiquitin ligase that exclusively binds VCP and enhances ER-associated degradation (ERAD) (28). The Npl4-Ufd1-VCP complex is involved in nuclear envelope assembly and targeting of proteins through the ubiquitin-proteasome system (29, 30). The cell survival response of this complex has been found to be important in DNA damage repair though activation by phosphorylation and its recruitment to double-stranded breaks (20, 31). The Npl4-Ufd1-VCP cytosolic complex is also recruited to the ER membrane, interacting with Derlin 1, VCP-interacting membrane proteins (VIMP), and other complexes. At the ER membrane, these misfolded proteins are targeted to the proteasome via ERAD (32-34). VCP also targets IKKβ for ubiquitination to the ubiquitin-proteasome system, implicating VCP in the cell survival pathway and neuroprotection (21, 35-37).To investigate the mechanism of neurodegeneration caused by VCP mutations, we first tested the hypothesis that VCP mutations decrease cell viability in vitro using a neuroblastoma SHSY-5Y cell line and then investigated cellular pathways that are known to lead to neurodegeneration, including decrease in proteasome activity, caspase-mediated degeneration, and a change in cellular localization of TDP-43.     

Secretory Carrier Membrane Protein 2 Regulates Cell-surface Targeting of Brain-enriched Na+/H+ Exchanger NHE5

NHE5 is a brain-enriched Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger that dynamically shuttles between the plasma membrane and recycling endosomes, serving as a mechanism that acutely controls the local pH environment. In the current study we show that secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs), a group of tetraspanning integral membrane proteins that reside in multiple secretory and endocytic organelles, bind to NHE5 and co-localize predominantly in the recycling endosomes. In vitro protein-protein interaction assays revealed that NHE5 directly binds to the N- and C-terminal cytosolic extensions of SCAMP2. Heterologous expression of SCAMP2 but not SCAMP5 increased cell-surface abundance as well as transporter activity of NHE5 across the plasma membrane. Expression of a deletion mutant lacking the SCAMP2-specific N-terminal cytosolic domain, and a mini-gene encoding the N-terminal extension, reduced the transporter activity. Although both Arf6 and Rab11 positively regulate NHE5 cell-surface targeting and NHE5 activity across the plasma membrane, SCAMP2-mediated surface targeting of NHE5 was reversed by dominant-negative Arf6 but not by dominant-negative Rab11. Together, these results suggest that SCAMP2 regulates NHE5 transit through recycling endosomes and promotes its surface targeting in an Arf6-dependent manner.Neurons and glial cells in the central and peripheral nervous systems are especially sensitive to perturbations of pH (1). Many voltage- and ligand-gated ion channels that control membrane excitability are sensitive to changes in cellular pH (1-3). Neurotransmitter release and uptake are also influenced by cellular and organellar pH (4, 5). Moreover, the intra- and extracellular pH of both neurons and glia are modulated in a highly transient and localized manner by neuronal activity (6, 7). Thus, neurons and glia require sophisticated mechanisms to finely tune ion and pH homeostasis to maintain their normal functions.Na⁺/H⁺ exchangers (NHEs)³ were originally identified as a class of plasma membrane-bound ion transporters that exchange extracellular Na⁺ for intracellular H⁺, and thereby regulate cellular pH and volume. Since the discovery of NHE1 as the first mammalian NHE (8), eight additional isoforms (NHE2-9) that share 25-70% amino acid identity have been isolated in mammals (9, 10). NHE1-5 commonly exhibit transporter activity across the plasma membrane, whereas NHE6-9 are mostly found in organelle membranes and are believed to regulate organellar pH in most cell types at steady state (11). More recently, NHE10 was identified in human and mouse osteoclasts (12, 13). However, the cDNA encoding NHE10 shares only a low degree of sequence similarity with other known members of the NHE gene family, raising the possibility that this sodium-proton exchanger may belong to a separate gene family distantly related to NHE1-9 (see Ref. 9).NHE gene family members contain 12 putative transmembrane domains at the N terminus followed by a C-terminal cytosolic extension that plays a role in regulation of the transporter activity by protein-protein interactions and phosphorylation. NHEs have been shown to regulate the pH environment of synaptic nerve terminals and to regulate the release of neurotransmitters from multiple neuronal populations (14-16). The importance of NHEs in brain function is further exemplified by the findings that spontaneous or directed mutations of the ubiquitously expressed NHE1 gene lead to the progression of epileptic seizures, ataxia, and increased mortality in mice (17, 18). The progression of the disease phenotype is associated with loss of specific neuron populations and increased neuronal excitability. However, NHE1-null mice appear to develop normally until 2 weeks after birth when symptoms begin to appear. Therefore, other mechanisms may compensate for the loss of NHE1 during early development and play a protective role in the surviving neurons after the onset of the disease phenotype.NHE5 was identified as a unique member of the NHE gene family whose mRNA is expressed almost exclusively in the brain (19, 20), although more recent studies have suggested that NHE5 might be functional in other cell types such as sperm (21, 22) and osteosarcoma cells (23). Curiously, mutations found in several forms of congenital neurological disorders such as spinocerebellar ataxia type 4 (24-26) and autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (27-29) have been mapped to chromosome 16q22.1, a region containing NHE5. However, much remains unknown as to the molecular regulation of NHE5 and its role in brain function.Very few if any proteins work in isolation. Therefore identification and characterization of binding proteins often reveal novel functions and regulation mechanisms of the protein of interest. To begin to elucidate the biological role of NHE5, we have started to explore NHE5-binding proteins. Previously, β-arrestins, multifunctional scaffold proteins that play a key role in desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors, were shown to directly bind to NHE5 and promote its endocytosis (30). This study demonstrated that NHE5 trafficking between endosomes and the plasma membrane is regulated by protein-protein interactions with scaffold proteins. More recently, we demonstrated that receptor for activated C-kinase 1 (RACK1), a scaffold protein that links signaling molecules such as activated protein kinase C, integrins, and Src kinase (31), directly interacts with and activates NHE5 via integrin-dependent and independent pathways (32). These results further indicate that NHE5 is partly associated with focal adhesions and that its targeting to the specialized microdomain of the plasma membrane may be regulated by various signaling pathways.Secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs) are a family of evolutionarily conserved tetra-spanning integral membrane proteins. SCAMPs are found in multiple organelles such as the Golgi apparatus, trans-Golgi network, recycling endosomes, synaptic vesicles, and the plasma membrane (33, 34) and have been shown to play a role in exocytosis (35-38) and endocytosis (39). Currently, five isoforms of SCAMP have been identified in mammals. The extended N terminus of SCAMP1-3 contain multiple Asn-Pro-Phe (NPF) repeats, which may allow these isoforms to participate in clathrin coat assembly and vesicle budding by binding to Eps15 homology (EH)-domain proteins (40, 41). Further, SCAMP2 was shown recently to bind to the small GTPase Arf6 (38), which is believed to participate in traffic between the recycling endosomes and the cell surface (42, 43). More recent studies have suggested that SCAMPs bind to organellar membrane type NHE7 (44) and the serotonin transporter SERT (45) and facilitate targeting of these integral membrane proteins to specific intracellular compartments. We show in the current study that SCAMP2 binds to NHE5, facilitates the cell-surface targeting of NHE5, and elevates Na⁺/H⁺ exchange activity at the plasma membrane, whereas expression of a SCAMP2 deletion mutant lacking the N-terminal domain containing the NPF repeats suppresses the effect. Further we show that this activity of SCAMP2 requires an active form of a small GTPase Arf6, but not Rab11. We propose a model in which SCAMPs bind to NHE5 in the endosomal compartment and control its cell-surface abundance via an Arf6-dependent pathway.     

Multiple Anaphase-promoting Complex/Cyclosome Degrons Mediate the Degradation of Human Sgo1

Shugoshin 1 (Sgo1) protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion in early mitosis and, thus, prevents premature sister-chromatid separation. The protein level of Sgo1 is regulated during the cell cycle; it peaks in mitosis and is down-regulated in G₁/S. Here we show that Sgo1 is degraded during the exit from mitosis, and its degradation depends on the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Overexpression of Cdh1 reduces the protein levels of ectopically expressed Sgo1 in human cells. Sgo1 is ubiquitinated by APC/C bound to Cdh1 (APC/C^Cdh1) in vitro. We have further identified two functional degradation motifs in Sgo1; that is, a KEN (Lys-Glu-Asn) box and a destruction box (D box). Although removal of either motif is not sufficient to stabilize Sgo1, Sgo1 with both KEN box and D box deleted is stable in cells. Surprisingly, mitosis progresses normally in the presence of non-degradable Sgo1, indicating that degradation of Sgo1 is not required for sister-chromatid separation or mitotic exit. Finally, we show that the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1 contributes to the maintenance of Sgo1 steady-state protein levels in an APC/C-independent mechanism.Loss of sister-chromatid cohesion triggers chromosome segregation in mitosis and occurs in two steps in vertebrate cells (1-3). In prophase, cohesin is phosphorylated by mitotic kinases including Plk1 and removed from chromosome arms (1, 4). Then, cleavage of centromeric cohesin by separase takes place at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition to allow sister-chromatid separation (5). The shugoshin (Sgo) family of proteins plays an important role in the protection of centromeric cohesion (6, 7). Human cells depleted of Sgo1 by RNAi undergo massive chromosome missegregation (8-11). In cells with compromised Sgo1 function, centromeric cohesin is improperly phosphorylated and removed (4, 11), resulting in premature sister-chromatid separation. It has been shown recently that Sgo1 collaborates with PP2A to counteract the action of Plk1 and other mitotic kinases and to protect centromeric cohesin from premature removal (12-14). In addition, Sgo1 has also been shown to promote stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment and sense tension across sister kinetochores (8, 15). Thus, Sgo1 is crucial for mitotic progression and chromosome segregation.Orderly progression through mitosis is regulated by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C),² a large multiprotein ubiquitin ligase that targets key mitotic regulators for destruction by the proteasome (16). APC/C selects substrates for ubiquitination by using the Cdc20 or Cdh1 activator proteins to recognize specific sequences called APC/C degrons within target proteins (17). Several APC/C degrons have been characterized, including the destruction box (D box) and the Lys-Glu-Asn box (KEN box) (18, 19). The D box, with the consensus amino acid sequence of RXXLXXXN(X indicates any amino acid), are found in many APC/C substrates, including mitotic cyclins and are essential for their ubiquitin-mediated destruction. The KEN box, which contains a consensus KEN motif, is also found in several APC/C substrates and is preferentially but not exclusively recognized by APC/C^Cdh1. When APC/C is active, it directs progression through and exit from mitosis by catalyzing the ubiquitination and timely destruction of mitotic regulators, including cyclin A, cyclin B, and the separase inhibitor securin (16). The APC/C activity needs to be tightly controlled to prevent unscheduled substrate degradation. An important mechanism for APC/C regulation is the spindle checkpoint, which prevents the activation of APC/C and destruction of its substrates in response to kinetochores that have not properly attached to the mitotic spindle (20).Recent evidence shows that Sgo1 is a substrate of APC/C, and its protein levels oscillate during the cell cycle (8, 9). In this article we study the degradation of Sgo1 in human cells. We show that Sgo1 is degraded during mitotic exit, and this degradation depends on APC/C^Cdh1. We further show that both KEN and D boxes are required for Sgo1 degradation in vivo and ubiquitination in vitro. Removal of these motifs stabilizes Sgo1 in vivo. The prolonged presence of stable Sgo1 protein in human cells does not change the kinetics of chromosome segregation and mitotic exit. Therefore, a timely scheduled degradation of Sgo1 takes place but is not required for mitotic exit. Finally, we show that Bub1 regulates Sgo1 protein levels through a mechanism that does not involve APC/C-mediated degradation.     

Adenine Nucleotide-dependent Regulation of Assembly of Bacterial Tubulin-like FtsZ by a Hypermorph of Bacterial Actin-like FtsA

Cytokinesis in bacteria depends upon the contractile Z ring, which is composed of dynamic polymers of the tubulin homolog FtsZ as well as other membrane-associated proteins such as FtsA, a homolog of actin that is required for membrane attachment of the Z ring and its subsequent constriction. Here we show that a previously characterized hypermorphic mutant FtsA (FtsA*) partially disassembled FtsZ polymers in vitro. This effect was strictly dependent on ATP or ADP binding to FtsA* and occurred at substoichiometric levels relative to FtsZ, similar to cellular levels. Nucleotide-bound FtsA* did not affect FtsZ GTPase activity or the critical concentration for FtsZ assembly but was able to disassemble preformed FtsZ polymers, suggesting that FtsA* acts on FtsZ polymers. Microscopic examination of the inhibited FtsZ polymers revealed a transition from long, straight polymers and polymer bundles to mainly short, curved protofilaments. These results indicate that a bacterial actin, when activated by adenine nucleotides, can modify the length distribution of bacterial tubulin polymers, analogous to the effects of actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin on F-actin.Bacterial cell division requires a large number of proteins that colocalize to form a putative protein machine at the cell membrane (1). This machine, sometimes called the divisome, recruits enzymes to synthesize the septum cell wall and to initiate and coordinate the invagination of the cytoplasmic membrane (and in Gram-negative bacteria, the outer membrane). The most widely conserved and key protein for this process is FtsZ, a homolog of tubulin that forms a ring structure called the Z ring, which marks the site of septum formation (2, 3). Like tubulin, FtsZ assembles into filaments with GTP but does not form microtubules (4). The precise assembly state and conformation of these FtsZ filaments at the division ring is not clear, although recent electron tomography work suggests that the FtsZ ring consists of multiple short filaments tethered to the membrane at discrete junctures (5), which may represent points along the filaments bridged by membrane anchor proteins.In Escherichia coli, two of these anchor proteins are known. One of these, ZipA, is not well conserved but is an essential protein in E. coli. ZipA binds to the C-terminal tail of FtsZ (6–8), and purified ZipA promotes bundling of FtsZ filaments in vitro (9, 10). The other, FtsA, is also essential in E. coli and is more widely conserved among bacterial species. FtsA is a member of the HSP70/actin superfamily (11, 12), and like ZipA, it interacts with the C-terminal tail of FtsZ (7, 13–15). FtsA can self-associate (16, 17) and bind ATP (12, 18), but reports of ATPase activity vary, with Bacillus subtilis FtsA having high activity (19) and Streptococcus pneumoniae FtsA exhibiting no detectable activity (20). There are no reports of any other in vitro activities of FtsA, including effects on FtsZ assembly.Understanding how FtsA affects FtsZ assembly is important because FtsA has a number of key activities in the cell. It is required for recruitment of a number of divisome proteins (21, 22) and helps to tether the Z ring to the membrane via a C-terminal membrane-targeting sequence (23). FtsA, like ZipA and other divisome proteins, is necessary to activate the contraction of the Z ring (24, 25). In E. coli, the FtsA:FtsZ ratio is crucial for proper cell division, with either too high or too low a ratio inhibiting septum formation (26, 27). This ratio is roughly 1:5, with ∼700 molecules of FtsA and 3200 molecules of FtsZ per cell (28), which works out to concentrations of 1–2 and 5–10 μm, respectively.Another interesting property of FtsA is that single residue alterations in the protein can result in significant enhancement of divisome activity. For example, the R286W mutation of FtsA, also called FtsA*, can substitute for the native FtsA and divide the cell. However, this mutant FtsA causes E. coli cells to divide at less than 80% of their normal length (29) and allows efficient division of E. coli cells in the absence of ZipA (30), indicating that it has gain-of-function activity. FtsA* and other hypermorphic mutations such as E124A and I143L can also increase division activity in cells lacking other essential divisome components (31–33). The R286W and E124A mutants of FtsA also bypass the FtsA:FtsZ ratio rule, allowing cell division to occur at higher ratios than with WT² FtsA. This may be because the altered FtsA proteins self-associate more readily than WT FtsA, which may cause different changes in FtsZ assembly state as compared with WT FtsA (17, 34).In this study, we use an in vitro system with purified FtsZ and a purified tagged version of FtsA* to elucidate the role of FtsA in activating constriction of the Z ring in vivo. We show that FtsA*, at physiological concentrations in the presence of ATP or ADP, has significant effects on the assembly of FtsZ filaments.     

Structural and Mechanistic Insights into Lunatic Fringe from a Kinetic Analysis of Enzyme Mutants

The Notch receptor is critical for proper development where it orchestrates numerous cell fate decisions. The Fringe family of β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases are regulators of this pathway. Fringe enzymes add N-acetylglucosamine to O-linked fucose on the epidermal growth factor repeats of Notch. Here we have analyzed the reaction catalyzed by Lunatic Fringe (Lfng) in detail. A mutagenesis strategy for Lfng was guided by a multiple sequence alignment of Fringe proteins and solutions from docking an epidermal growth factor-like O-fucose acceptor substrate onto a homology model of Lfng. We targeted three main areas as follows: residues that could help resolve where the fucose binds, residues in two conserved loops not observed in the published structure of Manic Fringe, and residues predicted to be involved in UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) donor specificity. We utilized a kinetic analysis of mutant enzyme activity toward the small molecule acceptor substrate 4-nitrophenyl-α-l-fucopyranoside to judge their effect on Lfng activity. Our results support the positioning of O-fucose in a specific orientation to the catalytic residue. We also found evidence that one loop closes off the active site coincident with, or subsequent to, substrate binding. We propose a mechanism whereby the ordering of this short loop may alter the conformation of the catalytic aspartate. Finally, we identify several residues near the UDP-GlcNAc-binding site, which are specifically permissive toward UDP-GlcNAc utilization.Defects in Notch signaling have been implicated in numerous human diseases, including multiple sclerosis (1), several forms of cancer (2-4), cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with sub-cortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (5), and spondylocostal dysostosis (SCD)³ (6-8). The transmembrane Notch signaling receptor is activated by members of the DSL (Delta, Serrate, Lag2) family of ligands (9, 10). In the endoplasmic reticulum, O-linked fucose glycans are added to the epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats of the Notch extracellular domain by protein O-fucosyltransferase 1 (11-13). These O-fucose monosaccharides can be elongated in the Golgi apparatus by three highly conserved β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases of the Fringe family (Lunatic (Lfng), Manic (Mfng), and Radical Fringe (Rfng) in mammals) (14-16). The formation of this GlcNAc-β1,3-Fuc-α1, O-serine/threonine disaccharide is necessary and sufficient for subsequent elongation to a tetrasaccharide (15, 19), although elongation past the disaccharide in Drosophila is not yet clear (20, 21). Elongation of O-fucose by Fringe is known to potentiate Notch signaling from Delta ligands and inhibit signaling from Serrate ligands (22). Delta ligands are termed Delta-like (Delta-like1, -2, and -4) in mammals, and the homologs of Serrate are known as Jagged (Jagged1 and -2) in mammals. The effects of Fringe on Drosophila Notch can be recapitulated in Notch ligand in vitro binding assays using purified components, suggesting that the elongation of O-fucose by Fringe alters the binding of Notch to its ligands (21). Although Fringe also appears to alter Notch-ligand interactions in mammals, the effects of elongation of the glycan past the O-fucose monosaccharide is more complicated and appears to be cell type-, receptor-, and ligand-dependent (for a recent review see Ref. 23).The Fringe enzymes catalyze the transfer of GlcNAc from the donor substrate UDP-α-GlcNAc to the acceptor fucose, forming the GlcNAc-β1,3-Fuc disaccharide (14-16). They belong to the GT-A-fold of inverting glycosyltransferases, which includes N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I and β1,4-galactosyltransferase I (17, 18). The mechanism is presumed to proceed through the abstraction of a proton from the acceptor substrate by a catalytic base (Asp or Glu) in the active site. This creates a nucleophile that attacks the anomeric carbon of the nucleotide-sugar donor, inverting its configuration from α (on the nucleotide sugar) to β (in the product) (24, 25). The enzyme then releases the acceptor substrate modified with a disaccharide and UDP. The Mfng structure (26) leaves little doubt as to the identity of the catalytic residue, which in all likelihood is aspartate 289 in mouse Lfng (we will use numbering for mouse Lunatic Fringe throughout, unless otherwise stated). The structure of Mfng with UDP-GlcNAc soaked into the crystals (26) showed density only for the UDP portion of the nucleotide-sugar donor and no density for two loops flanking either side of the active site. The presence of flexible loops that become ordered upon substrate binding is a common observation with glycosyltransferases in the GT-A fold family (18, 25). Density for the entire donor was observed in the structure of rabbit N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (27). In this case, ordering of a previously disordered loop upon UDP-GlcNAc binding may have contributed to increased stability of the donor. In the case of bovine β1,4-galactosyltransferase I, a section of flexible random coil from the apo-structure was observed to change its conformation to α-helical upon donor substrate binding (28). Both loops in Lfng are highly conserved, and we have mutated a number of residues in each to test the hypothesis that they interact with the substrates. The mutagenesis strategy was also guided by docking of an EGF-O-fucose acceptor substrate into the active site of the Lfng model as well as comparison of the Lfng model with a homology model of the β1,3-glucosyltransferase (β3GlcT) that modifies O-fucose on thrombospondin type 1 repeats (29, 30). The β3GlcT is predicted to be a GT-A fold enzyme related to the Fringe family (17, 18, 29).     

RecR-mediated Modulation of RecF Dimer Specificity for Single- and Double-stranded DNA

RecF pathway proteins play an important role in the restart of stalled replication and DNA repair in prokaryotes. Following DNA damage, RecF, RecR, and RecO initiate homologous recombination (HR) by loading of the RecA recombinase on single-stranded (ss) DNA, protected by ssDNA-binding protein. The specific role of RecF in this process is not well understood. Previous studies have proposed that RecF directs the RecOR complex to boundaries of damaged DNA regions by recognizing single-stranded/double-stranded (ss/ds) DNA junctions. RecF belongs to ABC-type ATPases, which function through an ATP-dependent dimerization. Here, we demonstrate that the RecF of Deinococcus radiodurans interacts with DNA as an ATP-dependent dimer, and that the DNA binding and ATPase activity of RecF depend on both the structure of DNA substrate, and the presence of RecR. We found that RecR interacts as a tetramer with the RecF dimer. RecR increases the RecF affinity to dsDNA without stimulating ATP hydrolysis but destabilizes RecF binding to ssDNA and dimerization, likely due to increasing the ATPase rate. The DNA-dependent binding of RecR to the RecF-DNA complex occurs through specific protein-protein interactions without significant contributions from RecR-DNA interactions. Finally, RecF neither alone nor in complex with RecR preferentially binds to the ss/dsDNA junction. Our data suggest that the specificity of the RecFOR complex toward the boundaries of DNA damaged regions may result from a network of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions, rather than a simple recognition of the ss/dsDNA junction by RecF.Homologous recombination (HR)² is one of the primary mechanisms by which cells repair dsDNA breaks (DSBs) and ssDNA gaps (SSGs), and is important for restart of stalled DNA replication (1). HR is initiated when RecA-like recombinases bind to ssDNA forming an extended nucleoprotein filament, referred to as a presynaptic complex (2). The potential for genetic rearrangements dictates that HR initiation is tightly regulated at multiple levels (1). During replication, the ssDNA-binding protein (SSB) protects transiently unwound DNA chains, preventing interactions with recombinases. Following DNA damage, recombination mediator proteins (RMPs) initiate HR by facilitating the formation of the recombinase filaments with ssDNA, while removing SSB (3, 4). Mutations in human proteins involved in HR initiation are linked to cancer predisposition, chromosome instability, UV sensitivity, and premature aging diseases (4–8). To date, little is known about the mechanism by which RMPs regulate the formation of the recombinase filaments on the SSB-protected ssDNA.In Escherichia coli, there are two major recombination pathways, RecBCD and RecF (9, 10). A helicase/nuclease RecBCD complex processes DSBs and recruits RecA on ssDNA in a sequence-specific manner (11–13). The principle players in the RecF pathway are the RecF, RecO, and RecR proteins, which form an epistatic group that is important for SSG repair, for restart of stalled DNA replication, and under specific conditions, can also process DSBs (14–20). Homologs of RecF, -O, and -R are present in the majority of known bacteria (21), including Deinococcus radiodurans, extremely radiation-resistant bacteria that lacks the RecBCD pathway, yet is capable of repairing thousands of DSBs (22, 23). In addition, the sequence or functional homologs of RecF pathway proteins are involved in similar pathways in eukaryotes that include among others WRN, BLM, RAD52, and BRCA2 proteins (4–8).The involvement of all three RecF, -O, and -R proteins in HR initiation is well documented by genetic and cellular approaches (18, 24–30), yet their biochemical functions in the initiation process remain unclear, particularly with respect to RecF. RecO and RecR proteins are sufficient to promote formation of the RecA filament on SSB-bound ssDNA in vitro (27). The UV-sensitive phenotype of recF mutants can be suppressed by RecOR overexpression, suggesting that RecF may direct the RMP complex to DNA-damaged regions where HR initiation is required (31). In agreement with this hypothesis, RecF dramatically increases the efficiency of the RecA loading at ds/ssDNA junctions with a 3′ ssDNA extension under specific conditions (32). RecF and RecR proteins also prevent the RecA filaments from extending into dsDNA regions adjacent to SSGs (33). These data suggest that RecF may directly recognize an ss/dsDNA junction structure (34). However, DNA binding experiments have not provided clear evidence to support such a hypothesis (11).The targeting promoted by RecF may also occur through more complex processes. RecF shares a high structural similarity with the head domain of Rad50, an ABC-type ATPase that recognizes DSBs and initiates repair in archaea and eukaryotes (35). All known ABC-type ATPases function as oligomeric complexes in which a sequence of inter- and intra-molecular interactions is triggered by the ATP-dependent dimerization and the dimer-dependent ATP hydrolysis (36–39). RecF is also an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein and a weak DNA-dependent ATPase (11, 40). RecF forms an ATP-dependent dimer and all three conserved motifs (Walker A, Walker B, and “signature”) of RecF are important for ATP-dependent dimerization, ATP hydrolysis, and functional resistance to DNA damage (35). Thus, RecF may function in recombination initiation through a complex pathway of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions regulated by ATP-dependent RecF dimerization.In this report, we present a detailed characterization of the RecF dimerization, and its role in the RecF interaction with various DNA substrates, with RecR, and in ATP hydrolysis. Our data outline the following key findings. First, RecF interacts with DNA as a dimer. Second, neither RecF alone nor the RecFR complex preferentially binds the ss/dsDNA junction. Finally, RecR changes the ATPase activity and the DNA binding of RecF by destabilizing the interaction with ssDNA, and greatly enhancing the interaction with dsDNA. Our results suggest that the specificity of RecF for the boundaries of SSGs is likely to result from a sequence of protein-protein interaction events rather than a simple RecF ss/dsDNA binding, underlining a highly regulated mechanism of the HR initiation by the RecFOR proteins.     

Structural Basis for the Antiproliferative Activity of the Tob-hCaf1 Complex

The Tob/BTG family is a group of antiproliferative proteins containing two highly homologous regions, Box A and Box B. These proteins all associate with CCR4-associated factor 1 (Caf1), which belongs to the ribonuclease D (RNase D) family of deadenylases and is a component of the CCR4-Not deadenylase complex. Here we determined the crystal structure of the complex of the N-terminal region of Tob and human Caf1 (hCaf1). Tob exhibited a novel fold, whereas hCaf1 most closely resembled the catalytic domain of yeast Pop2 and human poly(A)-specific ribonuclease. Interestingly, the association of hCaf1 was mediated by both Box A and Box B of Tob. Cell growth assays using both wild-type and mutant proteins revealed that deadenylase activity of Caf1 is not critical but complex formation is crucial to cell growth inhibition. Caf1 tethers Tob to the CCR4-Not deadenylase complex, and thereby Tob gathers several factors at its C-terminal region, such as poly(A)-binding proteins, to exert antiproliferative activity.The Tob/BTG family (also called the APRO family) is a group of antiproliferative proteins (1, 2) consisting of Tob (3), Tob2 (4), BTG1 (5), BTG2/Tis21/PC3 (6-8), PC3B (9), and ANA/BTG3 (10, 11) in mammalian cells, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"AF177464","term_id":"5916227","term_text":"AF177464"}}AF177464 in Drosophila, and FOG-3 in Caenorhabditis elegans (12). A recent genome project reported that the BTG/Tob family protein had already existed in Choanoflagellida Monosiga brevicollis MX1. The N-terminal region of the Tob/BTG family proteins is conserved and includes two highly homologous regions, Box A and Box B. The Tob/BTG family proteins are involved in cell cycle regulation in a variety of cells such as T lymphocytes, fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and germ cells. In Tob-deficient mice, the incidence of liver tumors is higher than in wild-type mice. Furthermore, because the levels of tob expression are often repressed in human lung cancers, suppression of its expression is thought to contribute to tumor progression (13).The antiproliferative activities of the Tob/BTG family proteins are due to their association with target proteins in cells. For example, Tob associates with SMAD family proteins and acts as a negative regulator of SMAD signaling. In osteoblasts, this negative regulation occurs via association with SMAD 1, 5, 6, and 8 (14, 15), and via association with SMAD 2 and 4 in anergic quiescent T cells (16). Tob/BTG family proteins also bind to protein arginine methyltransferase, which regulates chromatin assembly by histone methylation (17). Much evidence has been accumulated to suggest that CCR4-associated factor 1 (Caf1),² also known as Cnot7 and involved in the CCR4-Not deadenylase complex, is a common binding partner of the Tob/BTG family proteins (4, 18-21). To reveal the functions of Caf1 in vivo, caf1^-/- mice have been generated in two groups. Male caf1-deficient mice are infertile because of a malfunction of the testicular somatic cells that leads to a defect in spermatogenesis (22, 23). Genetic analysis of the nematode C. elegans also suggests that FOG3 (Tob orthologue) interacts with CCF1, the C. elegans homologue of Caf1, and that this interaction is essential for germ cells to initiate spermatogenesis (24).Mouse and human Caf1 (mCaf1 and hCaf1) were found as homologues of yeast Pop2, a component of the CCR4-Not complex (18, 25). Yeast Pop2 displays weak RNase activity but enhances the deadenylation of the poly(A) tail of mRNA by the CCR4-Not deadenylase complex (26-29). The primary structure of mammalian Caf1 is related to that of the ribonuclease D (RNase D) family, and all of the active site residues are well conserved (30). Indeed, both mCaf1 and hCaf1 have deadenylase activity (31-33).Although the relationship between cell cycle repression and poly(A) deadenylation is not well understood, mRNA degradation and synthesis are major events in maintaining the cell cycle (34). The mRNAs in a eukaryotic cell have a wide range of half-lives. Degradation of mRNA is initiated by shortening of the poly(A) tail. Thereafter, the 5′-cap structure is removed and the remaining portion of the mRNA is rapidly degraded. The degradation of eukaryotic mRNAs is regulated precisely at each stage of the cell cycle. Tob was reported to associate with inducible poly(A)-binding protein (iPABP) and to abrogate the translation of interleukin-2 mRNA in vitro (35). Recent reports also showed that Tob and BTG2 interact with the CCR4-Not deadenylase complex using the Tob/BTG2 domain and the cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein (PABPC1) using the C-terminal tail and enhanced mRNA degradation (36-38).To help elucidate the relationship between the antiproliferative activity of Tob and the degradation of the poly(A) tail, we determined the crystal structure of the Tob-hCaf1 complex. We found that hCaf1 has a structure similar to yeast Pop2 and human PARN of deadenylases, exonuclease I, and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I from Escherichia coli. In contrast, Tob has a novel structure. Specifically, Box A and Box B mediate the interaction between Tob and hCaf1. Cell growth assays using the wild and mutant proteins, together with the structural studies, revealed that the complex formation is crucial to cell growth inhibition.     

Membrane Permeabilization by Trypanosome Lytic Factor, a Cytolytic Human High Density Lipoprotein

Trypanosome lytic factor (TLF) is a subclass of human high density lipoprotein (HDL) that mediates an innate immune killing of certain mammalian trypanosomes, most notably Trypanosoma brucei brucei, the causative agent of a wasting disease in cattle. Mechanistically, killing is initiated in the lysosome of the target trypanosome where the acidic pH facilitates a membrane-disrupting activity by TLF. Here we utilize a model liposome system to characterize the membrane binding and permeabilizing activity of TLF and its protein constituents, haptoglobin-related protein (Hpr), apolipoprotein L-1 (apoL-1), and apolipoprotein A-1 (apoA-1). We show that TLF efficiently binds and permeabilizes unilamellar liposomes at lysosomal pH, whereas non-lytic human HDL exhibits inefficient permeabilizing activity. Purified, delipidated Hpr and apoL-1 both efficiently permeabilize lipid bilayers at low pH. Trypanosome lytic factor, apoL-1, and apoA-1 exhibit specificity for anionic membranes, whereas Hpr permeabilizes both anionic and zwitterionic membranes. Analysis of the relative particle sizes of susceptible liposomes reveals distinctly different membrane-active behavior for native TLF and the delipidated protein components. We propose that lysosomal membrane damage in TLF-susceptible trypanosomes is initiated by the stable association of the TLF particle with the lysosomal membrane and that this is a property unique to this subclass of human HDL.High density lipoproteins (HDL)² are complex yet ordered macromolecules consisting of characteristic proteins embedded in a phospholipid monolayer that surrounds a hydrophobic core of esterified cholesterol and triglycerides. A subclass of HDL is responsible for an innate immune killing of the African blood stream parasite Trypanosoma brucei brucei (1–3), and very recently, has been shown to be cytotoxic to intracellular Leishmania promastigotes (4). The trypanolytic HDL particle, termed trypanosome lytic factor (TLF), is characterized by the presence of two proteins, apolipoprotein L-1 (apoL-1) and haptoglobin-related protein (Hpr), as well as the HDL ubiquitous apolipoprotein A-1 (apoA-1) (1, 5–7). Killing of the susceptible parasite involves high affinity binding to a cell-surface receptor, endocytosis, and trafficking of the TLF particle to the lysosome (8–12). The acidic lysosomal environment facilitates a membrane-disrupting activity by the TLF particle and subsequent cell death (9, 13). It has been shown that purified, delipidated apoL-1 or Hpr are sufficient for trypanosome killing. When these proteins are incorporated into the same lipoprotein particle, a several hundredfold increase in killing activity is exhibited (5). In addition, Molina-Portela et al. (14) show that maximal protection against T. b. brucei in a transgenic mouse model requires the expression of human Hpr, apoL-1, and apoA-1, supporting a synergistic mode of action.Haptoglobin-related protein evolved during primate evolution and is restricted to apes, old world monkeys, and humans (15). Haptoglobin-related protein is highly similar (92%) to the acute phase serum protein haptoglobin (Hp) (16). All mammals use Hp as a scavenger of hemoglobin (Hb) released during hemolysis associated with infection or trauma. Haptoglobin binds cell-free Hb with high affinity and facilitates its removal from the circulation through a receptor-mediated process in the liver (17). Like Hp, Hpr binds free Hb, yet this Hpr·Hb complex is not recognized by the requisite receptors in mammals and is thus not removed from the circulation (18). TLF uptake by susceptible trypanosomes requires specific binding to an Hpr·Hb complex that facilitates trafficking of the TLF particle to the lysosome (10). It has been proposed that once inside the lysosomal compartment, Hpr·Hb contributes directly to membrane disruption through the generation of oxygen radicals with the bound Hb providing the iron necessary for Fenton chemistry (7, 10, 19).Apolipoprotein L-1 is a unique member of the apolipoprotein L protein family in that, unlike the remaining apoL proteins, it possesses an N-terminal signal sequence and is thus secreted from cells. As is the case for Hpr, apoL-1 appeared during primate evolution (20–22). Within the circulation of primates, apoL-1 is exclusively associated with HDL, and the majority of the protein is in the TLF subclass (5). The apoL family members are all predicted to adopt amphipathic α-helical conformations, suggesting that their physiological role involves membrane interaction (20). Apolipoprotein L-1 shares limited homology with channel-forming colicins and, consistent with this observation, has been shown to function as an ion channel when incorporated into lipid bilayers (23).The ultimate fate of TLF-targeted lysosomal membranes is not firmly established. Several studies employing both in vivo cellular analysis and artificial membrane systems address this point with conflicting results. Electron microscopy studies with gold-conjugated TLF revealed accumulation of TLF in intracellular vesicles and subsequent vesicle membrane breakdown and appearance of gold particles in the cytoplasm (9). Widener et al. (10) observed efflux of lysosomally localized large molecular mass dextrans (500 kDa) in TLF-treated T. b. brucei. These data suggest that the lysosomal membrane experiences large scale disruption. In contrast, Perez-Morga et al. (23) and Vanhollebeke et al. (24) report uncontrollable lysosomal swelling in susceptible trypanosomes treated with normal human serum, suggesting stability of the lamellar structure of the lysosomal membrane after TLF attack. Swelling is attributed to apoL-1-mediated influx of Cl^– ions and concomitant osmotic flow of water into the lysosome. However, Molina-Portela et al. (25) observed the formation of cation-selective pores in TLF-treated planar lipid bilayers composed of trypanosome lipids. The diversity of activities reported for TLF and normal human serum may reflect the packaging of multiple toxins within the same complex that can act synergistically to provide optimal killing activity (5, 14).Here we utilize model liposomes to monitor the membrane activity of TLF and its protein constituents. We describe the effects of TLF, delipidated Hpr, apoL-1, and apoA-1 on the permeability of unilamellar liposomes. Additionally, we show that TLF, apoL-1, and apoA-1 exhibit lipid specificity and that Hpr, apoL-1, and apoA-1 induce large scale changes in the geometry of liposomes. These results provide a molecular basis for the recognition of lysosomal membranes by this toxic HDL and support a multicomponent mechanism for trypanosome killing.