共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
John W. Hardin Francis E. Reyes Robert T. Batey 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(22):15317-15324
In archaea and eukarya, box C/D ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes are
responsible for 2′-O-methylation of tRNAs and rRNAs. The
archaeal box C/D small RNP complex requires a small RNA component (sRNA)
possessing Watson-Crick complementarity to the target RNA along with three
proteins: L7Ae, Nop5p, and fibrillarin. Transfer of a methyl group from
S-adenosylmethionine to the target RNA is performed by fibrillarin,
which by itself has no affinity for the sRNA-target duplex. Instead, it is
targeted to the site of methylation through association with Nop5p, which in
turn binds to the L7Ae-sRNA complex. To understand how Nop5p serves as a
bridge between the targeting and catalytic functions of the box C/D small RNP
complex, we have employed alanine scanning to evaluate the interaction between
the Pyrococcus horikoshii Nop5p domain and an L7Ae box C/D RNA
complex. From these data, we were able to construct an isolated RNA-binding
domain (Nop-RBD) that folds correctly as demonstrated by x-ray crystallography
and binds to the L7Ae box C/D RNA complex with near wild type affinity. These
data demonstrate that the Nop-RBD is an autonomously folding and functional
module important for protein assembly in a number of complexes centered on the
L7Ae-kinkturn RNP.Many biological RNAs require extensive modification to attain full
functionality in the cell (1).
Currently there are over 100 known RNA modification types ranging from small
functional group substitutions to the addition of large multi-cyclic ring
structures (2). Transfer RNA,
one of many functional RNAs targeted for modification
(3-6),
possesses the greatest modification type diversity, many of which are
important for proper biological function
(7). Ribosomal RNA, on the
other hand, contains predominantly two types of modified nucleotides:
pseudouridine and 2′-O-methylribose
(8). The crystal structures of
the ribosome suggest that these modifications are important for proper folding
(9,
10) and structural
stabilization (11) in
vivo as evidenced by their strong tendency to localize to regions
associated with function (8,
12,
13). These roles have been
verified biochemically in a number of cases
(14), whereas newly emerging
functional modifications are continually being investigated.Box C/D ribonucleoprotein
(RNP)3 complexes serve
as RNA-guided site-specific 2′-O-methyltransferases in both
archaea and eukaryotes (15,
16) where they are referred to
as small RNP complexes and small nucleolar RNPs, respectively. Target RNA
pairs with the sRNA guide sequence and is methylated at the 2′-hydroxyl
group of the nucleotide five bases upstream of either the D or D′ box
motif of the sRNA (Fig. 1,
star) (17,
18). In archaea, the internal
C′ and D′ motifs generally conform to a box C/D consensus sequence
(19), and each sRNA contains
two guide regions ∼12 nucleotides in length
(20). The bipartite
architecture of the RNP potentially enables the complex to methylate two
distinct RNA targets (21) and
has been shown to be essential for site-specific methylation
(22).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Organization of the archaeal box C/D complex. The protein components
of this RNP are L7Ae, Nop5p, and fibrillarin, which together bind a box C/D
sRNA. The regions of the Box C/D sRNA corresponding to the conserved C, D,
C′, and D′ boxes are labeled. The target RNA binds the sRNA
through Watson-Crick pairing and is methylated by fibrillarin at the fifth
nucleotide from the D/D′ boxes (star).In addition to the sRNA, the archaeal box C/D complex requires three
proteins for activity (23):
the ribosomal protein L7Ae
(24,
25), fibrillarin, and the
Nop56/Nop58 homolog Nop5p (Fig.
1). L7Ae binds to both box C/D and the C′/D′ motifs
(26), which respectively
comprise kink-turn (27) or
k-loop structures (28), to
initiate the assembly of the RNP
(29,
30). Fibrillarin performs the
methyl group transfer from the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine to the
target RNA
(31-33).
For this to occur, the active site of fibrillarin must be positioned precisely
over the specific 2′-hydroxyl group to be methylated. Although
fibrillarin methylates this functional group in the context of a Watson-Crick
base-paired helix (guide/target), it has little to no binding affinity for
double-stranded RNA or for the L7Ae-sRNA complex
(22,
26,
33,
34). Nop5p serves as an
intermediary protein bringing fibrillarin to the complex through its
association with both the L7Ae-sRNA complex and fibrillarin
(22). Along with its role as
an intermediary between fibrillarin and the L7Ae-sRNA complex, Nop5p possesses
other functions not yet fully understood. For example, Nop5p self-dimerizes
through a coiled-coil domain
(35) that in most archaea and
eukaryotic homologs includes a small insertion sequence of unknown function
(36,
37). However, dimerization and
fibrillarin binding have been shown to be mutually exclusive in
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii Nop5p, potentially because of the
presence of this insertion sequence
(36). Thus, whether Nop5p is a
monomer or a dimer in the active RNP is still under debate.In this study, we focus our attention on the Nop5p protein to investigate
its interaction with a L7Ae box C/D RNA complex because both the
fibrillarin-Nop5p and the L7Ae box C/D RNA interfaces are known from crystal
structures (29,
35,
38). Individual residues on
the surface of a monomeric form of Nop5p (referred to as mNop5p)
(22) were mutated to alanine,
and the effect on binding affinity for a L7Ae box C/D motif RNA complex was
assessed through the use of electrophoretic mobility shift assays. These data
reveal that residues important for binding cluster within the highly conserved
NOP domain (39,
40). To demonstrate that this
domain is solely responsible for the affinity of Nop5p for the preassembled
L7Ae box C/D RNA complex, we expressed and purified it in isolation from the
full Nop5p protein. The isolated Nop-RBD domain binds to the L7Ae box C/D RNA
complex with nearly wild type affinity, demonstrating that the Nop-RBD is
truly an autonomously folding and functional module. Comparison of our data
with the crystal structure of the homologous spliceosomal hPrp31-15.5K
protein-U4 snRNA complex (41)
suggests the adoption of a similar mode of binding, further supporting a
crucial role for the NOP domain in RNP complex assembly. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Gaetan Pascreau Frank Eckerdt Andrea L. Lewellyn Claude Prigent James L. Maller 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(9):5497-5505
p53 is an important tumor suppressor regulating the cell cycle at multiple
stages in higher vertebrates. The p53 gene is frequently deleted or mutated in
human cancers, resulting in loss of p53 activity. This leads to centrosome
amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, three phenotypes also observed
after overexpression of the oncogenic kinase Aurora A. Accordingly, recent
studies have focused on the relationship between these two proteins. p53 and
Aurora A have been reported to interact in mammalian cells, but the function
of this interaction remains unclear. We recently reported that
Xenopus p53 can inhibit Aurora A activity in vitro but only
in the absence of TPX2. Here we investigate the interplay between
Xenopus Aurora A, TPX2, and p53 and show that newly synthesized TPX2
is required for nearly all Aurora A activation and for full p53 synthesis and
phosphorylation in vivo during oocyte maturation. In vitro,
phosphorylation mediated by Aurora A targets serines 129 and 190 within the
DNA binding domain of p53. Glutathione S-transferase pull-down
studies indicate that the interaction occurs via the p53 transactivation
domain and the Aurora A catalytic domain around the T-loop. Our studies
suggest that targeting of TPX2 might be an effective strategy for specifically
inhibiting the phosphorylation of Aurora A substrates, including p53.Aurora A is an oncogenic protein kinase that is active in mitosis and plays
important roles in spindle assembly and centrosome function
(1). Overexpression of either
human or Xenopus Aurora A transforms mammalian cells, but only when
the p53 pathway is altered
(2–4).
Aurora A is localized on centrosomes during mitosis, and overexpression of the
protein leads to centrosome amplification and aneuploidy
(2,
3,
5,
6), two likely contributors to
genomic instability (7,
8). Because of its oncogenic
potential and amplification in human tumors, considerable attention has been
focused on the mechanism of Aurora A activation in mitosis. Evidence from
several laboratories indicates that activation occurs as a result of
phosphorylation of a threonine residue in the T-loop of the kinase
(4,
9,
10). Purification of Aurora
A-activating activity from M phase Xenopus egg extracts led to an
apparent activation mechanism in which autophosphorylation at the T-loop is
stimulated by binding of the targeting protein for Xklp2 (TPX2)
(11–14).
On the other hand, it has been shown that Aurora A activity can be inhibited
by interaction with several proteins, including PP1 (protein phosphatase 1),
AIP (Aurora A kinase-interacting protein), and, more recently, p53
(9,
15–17).p53 is a well known tumor suppressor able to drive cell cycle arrest,
apoptosis, or senescence when DNA is damaged or cell integrity is threatened
(18,
19). In human cancers, the p53
gene is frequently deleted or mutated, leading to inactivation of p53
functions (20). p53 protein is
almost undetectable in “normal cells,” mainly due to its
instability. Indeed, during a normal cell cycle, p53 associates with Mdm2 in
the nucleus and thereafter undergoes nuclear exclusion, allowing its
ubiquitination and subsequent degradation
(21). In cells under stress,
p53 is stabilized through the disruption of its interaction with Mdm2
(21), leading to p53
accumulation in the nucleus and triggering different responses, as described
above.Although p53 has mostly been characterized as a nuclear protein, it has
also been shown to localize on centrosomes
(22–24)
and regulate centrosome duplication
(23,
24). Centrosomes are believed
to act as scaffolds that concentrate many regulatory molecules involved in
signal transduction, including multiple protein kinases
(25). Thus, centrosomal
localization of p53 might be important for its own regulation by
phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, and one of its regulators could be the
mitotic kinase Aurora A. Indeed, phenotypes associated with the misexpression
of these two proteins are very similar. For example, overexpression of Aurora
A kinase leads to centrosome amplification, aneuploidy, and tumorigenesis, and
the same effects are often observed after down-regulation of p53
transactivation activity or deletion/mutation of its gene
(26,
27).Several recent studies performed in mammalian models show interplay between
p53 and Aurora A, with each protein having the ability to inhibit the other,
depending on the stage of the cell cycle and the stress level of the cell
(17,
28,
29). These studies reported
that p53 is a substrate of Aurora A, and serines 215 and 315 were demonstrated
to be the two major Aurora A phosphorylation sites in human p53 in
vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of Ser-215 within the DNA
binding domain of human p53 inhibited both p53 DNA binding and transactivation
activities (29). Recently, our
group showed that Xenopus p53 is able to inhibit Aurora A kinase
activity in vitro, but this inhibitory effect can be suppressed by
prior binding of Aurora A to TPX2
(9). Contrary to somatic cells,
where p53 is nuclear, unstable, and expressed at a very low level, p53 is
highly expressed in the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes and stable until
later stages of development
(30,
31). The high concentration of
both p53 and Aurora A in the oocyte provided a suitable basis for
investigating p53-Aurora A interaction and also evaluating Xenopus
p53 as a substrate of Aurora A. 相似文献
13.
Ruben K. Dagda Salvatore J. Cherra III Scott M. Kulich Anurag Tandon David Park Charleen T. Chu 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(20):13843-13855
Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease.
Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial
parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is
neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1
function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial
fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the
reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1.
Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased
mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced
autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role
in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines.
Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and
overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response.
The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in
PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins
Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting
oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic
remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function
elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the
autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may
cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial
homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects
∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown,
although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as
1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine
(6-OHDA),3 and
rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models
(1). Abnormalities in
mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells
and tissues from parkinsonian patients
(2,
3), which also exhibit
increased mitochondrial autophagy
(4). Furthermore, mutations in
parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial
homeostasis (5). Thus,
disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated
in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD
encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1)
(6,
7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and
mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that
possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence
(6,
8). The primary sequence also
includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the
PINK1 domain (8), a conserved
kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal
domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity
(9,
10). Overexpression of
wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several
toxic insults in neuronal cells
(6,
11,
12). Mitochondrial targeting
is necessary for some (13) but
not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1
(14), implicating involvement
of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology
(8). PINK1 catalytic activity
is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M
substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to
protect neurons (14). Although
PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated
mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of
neuroprotective activities
(13,
15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically
(3,
16-18)
to prevent oxidative stress
(19,
20) and regulate mitochondrial
morphology (21). Primary cells
derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with
disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells
(3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving
sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs)
for delivery to lysosomes (22,
23). Interestingly,
mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the
PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24,
25). Moreover, mitochondrial
fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative
diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases
(4,
26-28).
Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a
random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia,
mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic
substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective
mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy)
(29,
30). In particular,
mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models
involving oxidative mitochondrial injury
(25,
31,
32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates
(33-35)
and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology
(36). Chronic disruption of
lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria
with decreased calcium buffering capacity
(37), implicating an important
role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis
(37,
38). Recently, Parkin, which
complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology
(3), was found to promote
autophagy of depolarized mitochondria
(39). Conversely, Beclin
1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD
toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA
(25,
28,
31,
32), causing neurite
retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat
kinase 2 (40). Whereas
properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role,
excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic
stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration
(28).As mitochondrial fragmentation
(3) and increased mitochondrial
autophagy (4) have been
described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or
not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these
observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous
PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and
mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the
opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased
mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate
that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks,
suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy
limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function. 相似文献
14.
15.
Isabel Molina-Ortiz Rub��n A. Bartolom�� Pablo Hern��ndez-Varas Georgina P. Colo Joaquin Teixid�� 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(22):15147-15157
Melanoma cells express the chemokine receptor CXCR4 that confers high
invasiveness upon binding to its ligand CXCL12. Melanoma cells at initial
stages of the disease show reduction or loss of E-cadherin expression, but
recovery of its expression is frequently found at advanced phases. We
overexpressed E-cadherin in the highly invasive BRO lung metastatic cell
melanoma cell line to investigate whether it could influence CXCL12-promoted
cell invasion. Overexpression of E-cadherin led to defective invasion of
melanoma cells across Matrigel and type I collagen in response to CXCL12. A
decrease in individual cell migration directionality toward the chemokine and
reduced adhesion accounted for the impaired invasion. A p190RhoGAP-dependent
inhibition of RhoA activation was responsible for the impairment in
chemokine-stimulated E-cadherin melanoma transfectant invasion. Furthermore,
we show that p190RhoGAP and p120ctn associated predominantly on the plasma
membrane of cells overexpressing E-cadherin, and that E-cadherin-bound p120ctn
contributed to RhoA inactivation by favoring p190RhoGAP-RhoA association.
These results suggest that melanoma cells at advanced stages of the disease
could have reduced metastatic potency in response to chemotactic stimuli
compared with cells lacking E-cadherin, and the results indicate that
p190RhoGAP is a central molecule controlling melanoma cell invasion.Cadherins are a family of Ca2+-dependent adhesion molecules that
mediate cell-cell contacts and are expressed in most solid tissues providing a
tight control of morphogenesis
(1,
2). Classical cadherins, such
as epithelial (E) cadherin, are found in adherens junctions, forming core
protein complexes with β-catenin, α-catenin, and p120 catenin
(p120ctn). Both β-catenin and p120ctn directly interact with E-cadherin,
whereas α-catenin associates with the complex through its binding to
β-catenin, providing a link with the actin cytoskeleton
(1,
2). E-cadherin is frequently
lost or down-regulated in many human tumors, coincident with morphological
epithelial to mesenchymal transition and acquisition of invasiveness
(3-6).Although melanoma only accounts for 5% of skin cancers, when metastasis
starts, it is responsible for 80% of deaths from skin cancers
(7). Melanocytes express
E-cadherin
(8-10),
but melanoma cells at early radial growth phase show a large reduction in the
expression of this cadherin, and surprisingly, expression has been reported to
be partially recovered by vertical growth phase and metastatic melanoma cells
(9,
11,
12).Trafficking of cancer cells from primary tumor sites to intravasation into
blood circulation and later to extravasation to colonize distant organs
requires tightly regulated directional cues and cell migration and invasion
that are mediated by chemokines, growth factors, and adhesion molecules
(13). Solid tumor cells
express chemokine receptors that provide guidance of these cells to organs
where their chemokine ligands are expressed, constituting a homing model
resembling the one used by immune cells to exert their immune surveillance
functions (14). Most solid
cancer cells express CXCR4, a receptor for the chemokine CXCL12 (also called
SDF-1), which is expressed in lungs, bone marrow, and liver
(15). Expression of CXCR4 in
human melanoma has been detected in the vertical growth phase and on regional
lymph nodes, which correlated with poor prognosis and increased mortality
(16,
17). Previous in vivo
experiments have provided evidence supporting a crucial role for CXCR4 in the
metastasis of melanoma cells
(18).Rho GTPases control the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton during cell
migration (19,
20). The activity of Rho
GTPases is tightly regulated by guanine-nucleotide exchange factors
(GEFs),4 which
stimulate exchange of bound GDP by GTP, and inhibited by GTPase-activating
proteins (GAPs), which promote GTP hydrolysis
(21,
22), whereas guanine
nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) appear to mediate blocking of
spontaneous activation (23).
Therefore, cell migration is finely regulated by the balance between GEF, GAP,
and GDI activities on Rho GTPases. Involvement of Rho GTPases in cancer is
well documented (reviewed in Ref.
24), providing control of both
cell migration and growth. RhoA and RhoC are highly expressed in colon,
breast, and lung carcinoma
(25,
26), whereas overexpression of
RhoC in melanoma leads to enhancement of cell metastasis
(27). CXCL12 activates both
RhoA and Rac1 in melanoma cells, and both GTPases play key roles during
invasion toward this chemokine
(28,
29).Given the importance of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in melanoma cell invasion and
metastasis, in this study we have addressed the question of whether changes in
E-cadherin expression on melanoma cells might affect cell invasiveness. We
show here that overexpression of E-cadherin leads to impaired melanoma cell
invasion to CXCL12, and we provide mechanistic characterization accounting for
the decrease in invasion. 相似文献
16.
Kuen-Feng Chen Pei-Yen Yeh Chiun Hsu Chih-Hung Hsu Yen-Shen Lu Hsing-Pang Hsieh Pei-Jer Chen Ann-Lii Cheng 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(17):11121-11133
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive
human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However,
many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we
showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in
HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib
and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis.
Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we
found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in
mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that
bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in
TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, , a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized
resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by
small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells.
Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells
abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a
protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in
bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also
reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib,
indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on
TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at
clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and
this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt
pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC) LY2940022 is currently
the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of
cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment
but is only feasible in a small portion of patients
(1). Drug treatment is the
major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the
response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory
(1). Novel pharmacological
therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the
approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in
the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a
type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising
anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation
(2). TRAIL functions by
engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five
receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1,
DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4
and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of
death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced
apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor
molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently
recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is
sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type
of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for
apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome
c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and
caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal
cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms
responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance.
Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for
TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not
always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the
cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but
without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several
studies (4,
5). In addition, inactivation
of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL
in MMR-deficient tumors (6,
7), and reintroduction of Bax
into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity
(8), indicating that the Bcl-2
family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of
TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma
and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of
cancer (9). Accumulating
studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the
resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid
leukemia (4), lymphoma
(10–13),
prostate
(14–17),
colon (15,
18,
19), bladder
(14,
16), renal cell carcinoma
(20), thyroid
(21), ovary
(22), non-small cell lung
(23,
24), sarcoma
(25), and HCC
(26,
27). Molecular targets
responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell
death include DR4 (14,
27), DR5
(14,
20,
22–23,
28), c-FLIP
(4,
11,
21–23,
29), NF-κB
(12,
24,
30), p21
(16,
21,
25), and p27
(25). In addition, Bcl-2
family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL,
including Bcl-2 (10,
21), Bax
(13,
22), Bak
(27), Bcl-xL
(21), Bik
(18), and Bim
(15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular
determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells
(31). In this study, we
demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through
inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway. 相似文献
17.
Michael A. Gitcho Jeffrey Strider Deborah Carter Lisa Taylor-Reinwald Mark S. Forman Alison M. Goate Nigel J. Cairns 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(18):12384-12398
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with inclusion body myopathy and
Paget disease of bone is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by
mutations in the VCP (valosin-containing protein) gene. The disease
is characterized neuropathologically by frontal and temporal lobar atrophy,
neuron loss and gliosis, and ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U), which are
distinct from those seen in other sporadic and familial FTLD-U entities. The
major component of the ubiquitinated inclusions of FTLD with VCP
mutation is TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa). TDP-43 proteinopathy
links sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, sporadic FTLD-U, and most
familial forms of FTLD-U. Understanding the relationship between individual
gene defects and pathologic TDP-43 will facilitate the characterization of the
mechanisms leading to neurodegeneration. Using cell culture models, we have
investigated the role of mutant VCP in intracellular trafficking,
proteasomal function, and cell death and demonstrate that mutations in the
VCP gene 1) alter localization of TDP-43 between the nucleus and
cytosol, 2) decrease proteasome activity, 3) induce endoplasmic reticulum
stress, 4) increase markers of apoptosis, and 5) impair cell viability. These
results suggest that VCP mutation-induced neurodegeneration is
mediated by several mechanisms.Frontotemporal lobar degeneration
(FTLD)2
accounts for 10% of all late onset dementias and is the third most frequent
neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer disease and dementia with Lewy
bodies (1). FTLD with
ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions is genetically, clinically, and
neuropathologically heterogeneous
(2,
3). FTLD-U comprises several
distinct entities, including sporadic forms and familial cases caused by
mutations in the genes encoding VCP (valosin-containing protein), GRN
(progranulin), CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B), TDP-43 (TAR
DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa) and an unknown gene linked to chromosome 9
(2,
3). Frontotemporal dementia
with inclusion body myopathy and Paget disease of bone is a rare, autosomal
dominant disorder caused by mutations in the VCP gene located on
chromosome 9p13-p12
(4-10)
(Fig. 1). This multisystem
disease is characterized by progressive muscle weakness and atrophy, increased
osteoclastic bone resorption, and early onset frontotemporal dementia, also
called FTLD (9,
11). Mutations in VCP
are also associated with dilatative cardiomyopathy with ubiquitin-positive
inclusions (12).
Neuropathologic features of FTLD with VCP mutation include frontal
and temporal lobar atrophy, neuron loss and gliosis, and ubiquitin-positive
inclusions (FTLD-U). The majority of aggregates are ubiquitin- and
TDP-43-positive neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NIIs); a smaller proportion
is made up of TDP-43-immunoreactive dystrophic neurites (DNs) and neuronal
cytoplasmic inclusions (NCIs). A small number of inclusions are
VCP-immunoreactive (5,
13). Pathologic TDP-43 in
inclusions links a spectrum of diseases in which TDP-43 pathology is a primary
feature, including FTLD-U, motor neuron disease, including amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis, FTLD with motor neuron disease, and inclusion body myopathy and
Paget disease of bone, as well as an expanding spectrum of other disorders in
which TDP-43 pathology is secondary
(14,
15).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Model of pathogenic mutations and domains in valosin-containing
protein. CDC48 (magenta), located within the N terminus (residues
22-108), binds the following cofactors: p47, gp78, and Npl4-Ufd1
(23-25,
28). There are two AAA-ATPase
domains (AAA; blue) at residues 240-283 and 516-569, which
are joined by two linker regions (L1 and L2;
red).TDP-43 proteinopathy in FTLD with VCP mutation has a biochemical
signature similar to that seen in other sporadic and familial cases of FTLD-U,
including sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, FTLD-motor neuron disease,
FTLD with progranulin (GRN) mutation, and FTLD linked to chromosome
9p (3,
16). TDP-43 proteinopathy in
these disorders is characterized by hyperphosphorylation of TDP-43,
ubiquitination, and cleavage to form C-terminal fragments detected only in
insoluble brain extracts from affected brain regions
(16). Identification of TDP-43
as the major component of the ubiquitin-immunoreactive inclusions of FTLD with
VCP mutation supports the hypothesis that VCP gene mutations
cause an alteration of VCP function, leading to TDP-43 proteinopathy.VCP/p97 (valosin-containing protein) is a member of the AAA (ATPase
associated with diverse cellular activities) superfamily. The N-terminal
domain of VCP has been shown to be involved in cofactor binding (CDC48 (cell
division cycle protein 48)) and two AAA-ATPase domains that form a hexameric
complex (Fig. 1)
(17). Recently, it has been
shown that the N-terminal domain of VCP binds phosphoinositides
(18,
19). AKT (activated
serine-threonine protein kinase) phosphorylates VCP and is required for
constitutive VCP function (20,
21). AKT is activated through
phospholipid binding and phosphorylation via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase
signaling pathway, which is involved in cell survival
(22). The lipid binding domain
may recruit VCP to the cell membrane where it is phosphorylated by AKT
(19).The diversity of VCP functions is modulated, in part, by a variety of
intracellular cofactors, including p47, gp78, and Npl4-Ufd1
(23). Cofactor p47 has been
shown to play a role in the maintenance and biogenesis of both the endoplasmic
reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus
(24). The structure of p47
contains a ubiquitin regulatory X domain that binds the N-terminus of VCP, and
together they act as a chaperone to deliver membrane fusion machinery to the
site of adjacent membranes
(25). The function of the
p47-VCP complex is dependent upon cell division cycle 2 (CDC2)
serine-threonine kinase phosphorylation of p47
(26,
27). Also, VCP has been found
to interact with the cytosolic tail of gp78, an ER membrane-spanning E3
ubiquitin ligase that exclusively binds VCP and enhances ER-associated
degradation (ERAD) (28). The
Npl4-Ufd1-VCP complex is involved in nuclear envelope assembly and targeting
of proteins through the ubiquitin-proteasome system
(29,
30). The cell survival
response of this complex has been found to be important in DNA damage repair
though activation by phosphorylation and its recruitment to double-stranded
breaks (20,
31). The Npl4-Ufd1-VCP
cytosolic complex is also recruited to the ER membrane, interacting with
Derlin 1, VCP-interacting membrane proteins (VIMP), and other complexes. At
the ER membrane, these misfolded proteins are targeted to the proteasome via
ERAD
(32-34).
VCP also targets IKKβ for ubiquitination to the ubiquitin-proteasome
system, implicating VCP in the cell survival pathway and neuroprotection
(21,
35-37).To investigate the mechanism of neurodegeneration caused by VCP
mutations, we first tested the hypothesis that VCP mutations decrease
cell viability in vitro using a neuroblastoma SHSY-5Y cell line and
then investigated cellular pathways that are known to lead to
neurodegeneration, including decrease in proteasome activity, caspase-mediated
degeneration, and a change in cellular localization of TDP-43. 相似文献
18.
Maika Deffieu Ingrid Bhatia-Ki??ová Bénédicte Salin Anne Galinier Stéphen Manon Nadine Camougrand 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2009,284(22):14828-14837
The antioxidant N-acetyl-l-cysteine prevented the
autophagy-dependent delivery of mitochondria to the vacuoles, as examined by
fluorescence microscopy of mitochondria-targeted green fluorescent protein,
transmission electron microscopy, and Western blot analysis of mitochondrial
proteins. The effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine was specific
to mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy). Indeed, autophagy-dependent activation
of alkaline phosphatase and the presence of hallmarks of non-selective
microautophagy were not altered by N-acetyl-l-cysteine.
The effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine was not related to its
scavenging properties, but rather to its fueling effect of the glutathione
pool. As a matter of fact, the decrease of the glutathione pool induced by
chemical or genetical manipulation did stimulate mitophagy but not general
autophagy. Conversely, the addition of a cell-permeable form of glutathione
inhibited mitophagy. Inhibition of glutathione synthesis had no effect in the
strain Δuth1, which is deficient in selective mitochondrial
degradation. These data show that mitophagy can be regulated independently of
general autophagy, and that its implementation may depend on the cellular
redox status.Autophagy is a major pathway for the lysosomal/vacuolar delivery of
long-lived proteins and organelles, where they are degraded and recycled.
Autophagy plays a crucial role in differentiation and cellular response to
stress and is conserved in eukaryotic cells from yeast to mammals
(1,
2). The main form of autophagy,
macroautophagy, involves the non-selective sequestration of large portions of
the cytoplasm into double-membrane structures termed autophagosomes, and their
delivery to the vacuole/lysosome for degradation. Another process,
microautophagy, involves the direct sequestration of parts of the cytoplasm by
vacuole/lysosomes. The two processes coexist in yeast cells but their extent
may depend on different factors including metabolic state: for example, we
have observed that nitrogen-starved lactate-grown yeast cells develop
microautophagy, whereas nitrogen-starved glucose-grown cells preferentially
develop macroautophagy (3).Both macroautophagy and microautophagy are essentially non-selective, in
the way that autophagosomes and vacuole invaginations do not appear to
discriminate the sequestered material. However, selective forms of autophagy
have been observed (4) that
target namely peroxisomes (5,
6), chromatin
(7,
8), endoplasmic reticulum
(9), ribosomes
(10), and mitochondria
(3,
11–13).
Although non-selective autophagy plays an essential role in survival by
nitrogen starvation, by providing amino acids to the cell, selective autophagy
is more likely to have a function in the maintenance of cellular structures,
both under normal conditions as a “housecleaning” process, and
under stress conditions by eliminating altered organelles and macromolecular
structures
(14–16).
Selective autophagy targeting mitochondria, termed mitophagy, may be
particularly relevant to stress conditions. The mitochondrial respiratory
chain is both the main site and target of
ROS4 production
(17). Consequently, the
maintenance of a pool of healthy mitochondria is a crucial challenge for the
cells. The progressive accumulation of altered mitochondria
(18) caused by the loss of
efficiency of the maintenance process (degradation/biogenesis de
novo) is often considered as a major cause of cellular aging
(19–23).
In mammalian cells, autophagic removal of mitochondria has been shown to be
triggered following induction/blockade of apoptosis
(23), suggesting that
autophagy of mitochondria was required for cell survival following
mitochondria injury (14).
Consistent with this idea, a direct alteration of mitochondrial permeability
properties has been shown to induce mitochondrial autophagy
(13,
24,
25). Furthermore, inactivation
of catalase induced the autophagic elimination of altered mitochondria
(26). In the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the alteration of
F0F1-ATPase biogenesis in a conditional mutant has been
shown to trigger autophagy
(27). Alterations of
mitochondrial ion homeostasis caused by the inactivation of the
K+/H+ exchanger was shown to cause both autophagy and
mitophagy (28). We have
reported that treatment of cells with rapamycin induced early ROS production
and mitochondrial lipid oxidation that could be inhibited by the hydrophobic
antioxidant resveratrol (29).
Furthermore, resveratrol treatment impaired autophagic degradation of both
cytosolic and mitochondrial proteins and delayed rapamycin-induced cell death,
suggesting that mitochondrial oxidation events may play a crucial role in the
regulation of autophagy. This existence of regulation of autophagy by ROS has
received molecular support in HeLa cells
(30): these authors showed
that starvation stimulated ROS production, namely H2O2,
which was essential for autophagy. Furthermore, they identified the cysteine
protease hsAtg4 as a direct target for oxidation by
H2O2. This provided a possible connection between the
mitochondrial status and regulation of autophagy.Investigations of mitochondrial autophagy in nitrogen-starved lactate-grown
yeast cells have established the existence of two distinct processes: the
first one occurring very early, is selective for mitochondria and is dependent
on the presence of the mitochondrial protein Uth1p; the second one occurring
later, is not selective for mitochondria, is not dependent on Uth1p, and is a
form of bulk microautophagy
(3). The absence of the
selective process in the Δuth1 mutant strongly delays and
decreases mitochondrial protein degradation
(3,
12). The putative protein
phosphatase Aup1p has been also shown to be essential in inducing mitophagy
(31). Additionally several Atg
proteins were shown to be involved in vacuolar sequestration of mitochondrial
GFP (3,
12,
32,
33). Recently, the protein
Atg11p, which had been already identified as an essential protein for
selective autophagy has also been reported as being essential for mitophagy
(33).The question remains as to identify of the signals that trigger selective
mitophagy. It is particularly intriguing that selective mitophagy is activated
very early after the shift to a nitrogen-deprived medium
(3). Furthermore, selective
mitophagy is very active on lactate-grown cells (with fully differentiated
mitochondria) but is nearly absent in glucose-grown cells
(3). In the present paper, we
investigated the relationships between the redox status of the cells and
selective mitophagy, namely by manipulating glutathione. Our results support
the view that redox imbalance is a trigger for the selective elimination of
mitochondria. 相似文献
19.
20.