Regulated Proteolysis of Nonmuscle Myosin IIA Stimulates Osteoclast Fusion

The nonmuscle myosin IIA heavy chain (Myh9) is strongly associated with adhesion structures of osteoclasts. In this study, we demonstrate that during osteoclastogenesis, myosin IIA heavy chain levels are temporarily suppressed, an event that stimulates the onset of cell fusion. This suppression is not mediated by changes in mRNA or translational levels but instead is due to a temporary increase in the rate of myosin IIA degradation. Intracellular activity of cathepsin B is significantly enhanced at the onset of osteoclast precursor fusion, and specific inhibition of its activity prevents myosin IIA degradation. Further, treatment of normal cells with cathepsin B inhibitors during the differentiation process reduces cell fusion and bone resorption capacity, whereas overexpression of cathepsin B enhances fusion. Ongoing suppression of the myosin IIA heavy chain via RNA interference results in formation of large osteoclasts with significantly increased numbers of nuclei, whereas overexpression of myosin IIA results in less osteoclast fusion. Increased multinucleation caused by myosin IIA suppression does not require RANKL. Further, knockdown of myosin IIA enhances cell spreading and lessens motility. These data taken together strongly suggest that base-line expression of nonmuscle myosin IIA inhibits osteoclast precursor fusion and that a temporary, cathepsin B-mediated decrease in myosin IIA levels triggers precursor fusion during osteoclastogenesis.The final stages of osteoclastogenesis involve fusion of differentiated precursors from the monocyte/macrophage lineage (1). Although the membrane structural components regulating preosteoclast fusion are not well understood, in recent years a number of candidate cell surface molecules have been implicated, including receptors CD44 (2, 3), CD47 and its ligand macrophage fusion receptor (also known as signal regulatory protein α) (4–6), the purinergic receptor P2X₇ (7), and the disintegrin and metalloproteinase ADAM8 (8). A recently identified receptor, the dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein, is essential for osteoclast fusion both in vitro and in vivo (9, 10). More recently, the d2 subunit of proton-translocating vacuolar proton-translocating ATPases, a membrane subunit isoform expressed predominantly in osteoclasts, similarly was demonstrated to be required for fusion in vitro and in vivo (11). However, elucidation of the mechanisms by which these molecules may mediate cell fusion has proved to be difficult.The mammalian class II myosin family consists of distinct isoforms expressed in skeletal, smooth, and cardiac muscle, as well as three nonmuscle forms designated IIA, IIB, and IIC (12–14). Although all class II molecules are composed of two heavy chains, two essential light chains, and two regulatory chains, their unique activities are a function of their particular heavy chain isoforms. Although the nonmuscle heavy chain isoforms share extensive structural homology, they have been shown to demonstrate distinct patterns of expression (15–18), enzyme kinetics and activation (12, 19–21), and cellular function (22–24). Knock-out of either myosin IIA or IIB results in embryonic lethality, although death derives from defects unique to each isoform (25, 26). In vitro, myosin IIA, a target of Rho kinase, has been shown to be involved in a wide variety of cellular functions, including cytokinesis, cell contractility, and adhesion and motility.The actin cytoskeleton of osteoclasts possesses features unlike those of most mammalian cell types. First, osteoclasts do not possess stress fibers but instead form a meshwork of fine actin filaments throughout the cell (27–29). Osteoclasts express unusual attachment structures typified by the podosome, a form of adhesion structure most typically present in cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, dendritic cells, and smooth muscle cells. Podosomes are integrin-based cell-matrix contact structures that are notable for the presence of a short (0.5–1.0 μm) F-actin core surrounded by a ring of adaptor proteins, kinases, small GTPases, and regulators of endocytosis (30, 31). When cultured on glass, mature osteoclasts generate a belt of podosomes at the cell periphery. However, when cultured on bone, osteoclasts form a dense ring of podosome-like structures that is usually internal to the cell margins (32). This region, termed the sealing zone, surrounds a specialized membrane domain termed the ruffled border, from which protons and proteases are secreted to induce resorption of bone (1). We previously demonstrated that myosins IIA and IIB localize to distinct subcellular regions within osteoclasts, with MyoIIA² strongly segregating to both podosomes and the actin ring of the sealing zone (28). Because of this distribution into osteoclast adhesion structures and findings in other cells showing MyoIIA to be associated with dynamic Rho-kinase-dependent functions, such as adhesion and locomotion, we hypothesized that MyoIIA may play a vital role in cell motility and the bone resorption function. In this study, we examined cellular expression of MyoIIA during osteoclastogenesis and, along with RNA interference-mediated suppression of the protein, have confirmed its role in cell spreading, motility, and sealing zone formation. However, this study also unexpectedly revealed a role for MyoIIA in regulating preosteoclast fusion during osteoclastogenesis.     

Tiam1 and Rac1 Are Required for Platelet-activating Factor-induced Endothelial Junctional Disassembly and Increase in Vascular Permeability

It is known that platelet-activating factor (PAF) induces severe endothelial barrier leakiness, but the signaling mechanisms remain unclear. Here, using a wide range of biochemical and morphological approaches applied in both mouse models and cultured endothelial cells, we addressed the mechanisms of PAF-induced disruption of interendothelial junctions (IEJs) and of increased endothelial permeability. The formation of interendothelial gaps filled with filopodia and lamellipodia is the cellular event responsible for the disruption of endothelial barrier. We observed that PAF ligation of its receptor induced the activation of the Rho GTPase Rac1. Following PAF exposure, both Rac1 and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor Tiam1 were found associated with a membrane fraction from which they co-immunoprecipitated with PAF receptor. In the same time frame with Tiam1-Rac1 translocation, the junctional proteins ZO-1 and VE-cadherin were relocated from the IEJs, and formation of numerous interendothelial gaps was recorded. Notably, the response was independent of myosin light chain phosphorylation and thus distinct from other mediators, such as histamine and thrombin. The changes in actin status are driven by the PAF-induced localized actin polymerization as a consequence of Rac1 translocation and activation. Tiam1 was required for the activation of Rac1, actin polymerization, relocation of junctional associated proteins, and disruption of IEJs. Thus, PAF-induced IEJ disruption and increased endothelial permeability requires the activation of a Tiam1-Rac1 signaling module, suggesting a novel therapeutic target against increased vascular permeability associated with inflammatory diseases.The endothelial barrier is made up of endothelial cells (ECs)⁴ connected to each other by interendothelial junctions (IEJs) consisting of protein complexes organized as tight junctions (TJs) and adherens junctions (AJs). In addition, the focal adhesion complex located at the basal plasma membrane enables firm contact of ECs with the underlying basement membrane and also contributes to the barrier function (1-3). The glycocalyx, the endothelial monolayer, and the basement membrane all together constitute the vascular barrier.The structural integrity of the ECs along with their proper functionality are the two most important factors controlling the tightness of the endothelial barrier. Changes affecting these factors cause loss of barrier restrictiveness and leakiness. Therefore, defining and understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling these processes is of paramount importance. Increased width of IEJs in response to permeability-increasing mediators (4) regulates the magnitude of transendothelial exchange of fluid and solutes. Disruption of IEJs and the resultant barrier leakiness contribute to the genesis of diverse pathological conditions, such as inflammation (5), metastasis (6, 7), and uncontrolled angiogenesis (8, 9).Accumulated evidence demonstrated that IEJs changes are responsible for increased or decreased vascular permeability, and the generally accepted mechanism responsible for them was the myosin light chain (MLC)-mediated contraction of ECs (5, 10). However, published evidence showed that an increase in vascular permeability could be obtained without a direct involvement of any contractile mechanism (11-16).The main component of the vascular barrier, the ECs, has more than 10% of their total protein represented by actin (17), which under physiological salt concentrations subsists as monomers (G-actin) and assembled into filaments (F-actin). A large number of actin-interacting proteins may modulate the assembly, disassembly, and organization of G-actin and of actin filaments within a given cell type. Similar to the complexity of actin-interacting proteins found in other cell types, the ECs utilize their actin binding proteins to stabilize the endothelial monolayer in order to efficiently function as a selective barrier (11). In undisturbed ECs, the actin microfilaments are organized as different networks with distinctive functional and morphological characteristics: the peripheral filaments also known as peripheral dense band (PDB), the cytoplasmic fibers identified as stress fibers (SF), and the actin from the membrane cytoskeleton (18). The peripheral web, localized immediately under the membrane, is associated with (i) the luminal plasmalemma (on the apical side), (ii) the IEJ complexes on the lateral surfaces, and (iii) the focal adhesion complexes on the abluminal side (the basal part) of polarized ECs. The SF reside inside the endothelial cytoplasm and are believed to be directly connected with the plasmalemma proper on the luminal as well as on the abluminal side of the cell. As described, the endothelial actin cytoskeleton (specifically the SF) seems to be a stable structure helping the cells to remain flat under flow (19). It is also established that the actin fibers participate in correct localization of different junctional complexes while keeping them in place (20). However, it was suggested that the dynamic equilibrium between F- and G-actin might modulate the tightness of endothelial barrier in response to different challenges (13).Mediators effective at nanomolar concentrations or less that disrupt the endothelial barrier and increase vascular permeability include C2 toxin of Clostridium botulinum, vascular permeability factor, better known as vascular endothelial growth factor, and PAF (21). C2 toxin increases endothelial permeability by ribosylating monomeric G-actin at Arg-177 (22). This results in the impairment of actin polymerization (23), followed by rounding of ECs (16) and the disruption of junctional integrity. Vascular permeability factor was shown to open IEJs by redistribution of junctional proteins (24, 25) and by interfering with the equilibrium of actin pools (26). PAF (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocoline), a naturally synthesized phospholipid is active at 10^-10 m or less (27). PAF is synthesized by and acts on a variety of cell types, including platelets (28), neutrophils (29), monocytes (30), and ECs (31). PAF-mediated activation of ECs induced cell migration (32), angiogenesis (7), and vascular hyperpermeability (33) secondary to disassembly of IEJs (34). The effects of PAF on the endothelium are initiated through a G protein-coupled receptor (PAF-R) localized at the plasmalemma, in a large endosomal compartment inside the cell (34), and also in the nuclear membrane (35). In ECs, PAF-R was shown to signal through Gα_q and downstream activation of phospholipase C isozymes (PLCβ₃ and PLCγ₁), and via cSrc (32, 36). Studies have shown that PAF challenge induced endothelial actin cytoskeletal rearrangement (37) and marked vascular leakiness (38); however, the signaling pathways have not been elucidated.Therefore, in the present study, we carried out a systematic analysis of PAF-induced morphological and biochemical changes of endothelial barrier in vivo and in cultured ECs. We found that the opening of endothelial barrier and the increased vascular leakiness induced by PAF are the result of a shift in actin pools without involvement of EC contraction, followed by a redistribution of tight junctional associated protein ZO-1 and adherens junctional protein VE-cadherin.     

Energetic Requirements for Processive Elongation of Actin Filaments by FH1FH2-formins

Formin-homology (FH) 2 domains from formin proteins associate processively with the barbed ends of actin filaments through many rounds of actin subunit addition before dissociating completely. Interaction of the actin monomer-binding protein profilin with the FH1 domain speeds processive barbed end elongation by FH2 domains. In this study, we examined the energetic requirements for fast processive elongation. In contrast to previous proposals, direct microscopic observations of single molecules of the formin Bni1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae labeled with quantum dots showed that profilin is not required for formin-mediated processive elongation of growing barbed ends. ATP-actin subunits polymerized by Bni1p and profilin release the γ-phosphate of ATP on average >2.5 min after becoming incorporated into filaments. Therefore, the release of γ-phosphate from actin does not drive processive elongation. We compared experimentally observed rates of processive elongation by a number of different FH2 domains to kinetic computer simulations and found that actin subunit addition alone likely provides the energy for fast processive elongation of filaments mediated by FH1FH2-formin and profilin. We also studied the role of FH2 structure in processive elongation. We found that the flexible linker joining the two halves of the FH2 dimer has a strong influence on dissociation of formins from barbed ends but only a weak effect on elongation rates. Because formins are most vulnerable to dissociation during translocation along the growing barbed end, we propose that the flexible linker influences the lifetime of this translocative state.Formins are multidomain proteins that assemble unbranched actin filament structures for diverse processes in eukaryotic cells (reviewed in Ref. 1). Formins stimulate nucleation of actin filaments and, in the presence of the actin monomer-binding protein profilin, speed elongation of the barbed ends of filaments (2-6). The ability of formins to influence elongation depends on the ability of single formin molecules to remain bound to a growing barbed end through multiple rounds of actin subunit addition (7, 8). To stay associated during subunit addition, a formin molecule must translocate processively on the barbed end as each actin subunit is added (1, 9-12). This processive elongation of a barbed end by a formin is terminated when the formin dissociates stochastically from the growing end during translocation (4, 10).The formin-homology (FH)² 1 and 2 domains are the best conserved domains of formin proteins (2, 13, 14). The FH2 domain is the signature domain of formins, and in many cases, is sufficient for both nucleation and processive elongation of barbed ends (2-4, 7, 15). Head-to-tail homodimers of FH2 domains (12, 16) encircle the barbed ends of actin filaments (9). In vitro, association of barbed ends with FH2 domains slows elongation by limiting addition of free actin monomers. This “gating” behavior is usually explained by a rapid equilibrium of the FH2-associated end between an open state competent for actin monomer association and a closed state that blocks monomer binding (4, 9, 17).Proline-rich FH1 domains located N-terminal to FH2 domains are required for profilin to stimulate formin-mediated elongation. Individual tracks of polyproline in FH1 domains bind 1:1 complexes of profilin-actin and transfer the actin directly to the FH2-associated barbed end to increase processive elongation rates (4-6, 8, 10, 17).Rates of elongation and dissociation from growing barbed ends differ widely for FH1FH2 fragments from different formin homologs (4). We understand few aspects of FH1FH2 domains that influence gating, elongation or dissociation. In this study, we examined the source of energy for formin-mediated processive elongation, and the influence of FH2 structure on elongation and dissociation from growing ends. In contrast to previous proposals (6, 18), we found that fast processive elongation mediated by FH1FH2-formins is not driven by energy from the release of the γ-phosphate from ATP-actin filaments. Instead, the data show that the binding of an actin subunit to the barbed end provides the energy for processive elongation. We found that in similar polymerizing conditions, different natural FH2 domains dissociate from growing barbed ends at substantially different rates. We further observed that the length of the flexible linker between the subunits of a FH2 dimer influences dissociation much more than elongation.     

Molecular Mechanism of the Bifunctional Role of Lipopolysaccharide in Osteoclastogenesis

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a common bacteria-derived product, has long been recognized as a key factor implicated in periodontal bone loss. However, the precise cellular and molecular mechanisms by which LPS induces bone loss still remains controversial. Here, we show that LPS inhibited osteoclastogenesis from freshly isolated osteoclast precursors but stimulated osteoclast formation from those pretreated with RANKL in vitro in tissue culture dishes, bone slices, and a co-culture system containing osteoblasts, indicating that RANKL-mediated lineage commitment is a prerequisite for LPS-induced osteoclastogenesis. Moreover, the RANKL-mediated lineage commitment is long term, irreversible, and TLR4-dependent. LPS exerts the dual function primarily by modulating the expression of NFATc1, a master regulator of osteoclastogenesis, in that it abolished RANKL-induced NFATc1 expression in freshly isolated osteoclast precursors but stimulated its expression in RANKL-pretreated cells. In addition, LPS prolonged osteoclast survival by activating the Akt, NF-κB, and ERK pathways. Our current work has not only unambiguously defined the role of LPS in osteoclastogenesis but also has elucidated the molecular mechanism underlying its complex functions in osteoclast formation and survival, thus laying a foundation for future delineation of the precise mechanism of periodontal bone loss.LPS,² a common bacteria-derived product, has long been recognized as a key factor implicated in the development of chronic periodontitis. LPS plays an important role in periodontitis by initiating a local host response in gingival tissues that involves recruitment of inflammatory cells, production of prostanoids and cytokines, elaboration of lytic enzymes and activation of osteoclast formation and function to induce bone loss (1-3).Osteoclasts, the body''s sole bone-resorbing cells, are multinucleated giant cells that differentiate from cells of hematopoietic lineage upon stimulation by two critical factors: the macrophage/monocyte colony-forming factor (M-CSF) and the receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) (4-6). RANKL exerts its effects on osteoclast formation and function by binding to its receptor, RANK (receptor activator of NF-κB) expressed on osteoclast precursors and mature osteoclasts (7-9). RANKL also has a decoy receptor, osteoprotegerin, which inhibits RANKL action by competing with RANK for binding RANKL (10, 11).RANK is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) family (12). Members of the TNFR family lack intrinsic enzymatic activity, and hence they transduce intracellular signals by recruiting various adaptor proteins including TNF receptor-associated factors (TRAFs) through specific motifs in the cytoplasmic domain (13, 14). It has been established that RANK contains three functional TRAF-binding sites (³⁶⁹PFQEP³⁷³, ⁵⁵⁹PVQEET⁵⁶⁴, and ⁶⁰⁴PVQEQG⁶⁰⁹) that, redundantly, play a role in osteoclast formation and function (15, 16). Collectively, through these functional TRAF-binding motifs, RANK activates six major signaling pathways, NF-κB, JNK, ERK, p38, NFATc1, and Akt, which play important roles in osteoclast formation, function, and/or survival (15, 17-19). In particular, NFATc1 has been established as a master regulator of osteoclast differentiation (20-22).The involvement of osteoclasts in the pathogenesis of periodontal bone loss is supported by observations that osteoclasts are physically present and functionally involved in bone resorption in periodontal tissues (23-27). RANKL and RANK knockout mice develop osteopetrosis and show failure in tooth eruption due to a lack of osteoclasts (24, 25, 28). Moreover, op/op mice, in which a mutation in the coding region of the M-CSF gene generates a stop codon that leads to premature termination of translation of M-CSF mRNA, also show osteopetrosis and failure in tooth eruption due to a defect in osteoclast development (26, 27).Whereas the role of osteoclasts in periodontal disease associated alveolar bone destruction has been well established, the precise role of LPS in osteoclastogenesis still remains controversial. The vast majority of the previous studies demonstrated that LPS stimulates osteoclastogenesis. This is consistent with the role that LPS, a well recognized pathogenic factor in periodontitis, presumably plays in periodontal bone loss (29-33). However, two previous studies demonstrated, surprisingly, that LPS plays bifunctional roles in osteoclastogenesis in that although it inhibits osteoclast formation from normal osteoclast precursors, it reverses to promote osteoclastogenesis from osteoclast precursors pretreated with RANKL (34, 35). Given that this finding is inconsistent with the presumed role of LPS as a pathogenic factor in periodontal bone loss and lacks careful and further validation, the prevalent view is still that LPS stimulates osteoclastogenesis (1-3). Importantly, if LPS indeed has a dual function in osteoclastogenesis, the molecular mechanism by which LPS exerts a dual effect on osteoclastogenesis need to be further elucidated.In the present work, using various in vitro assays, we have demonstrated independently that LPS inhibits osteoclastogenesis from normal osteoclast precursors but promotes the development of osteoclasts from RANKL-pretreated cells in tissue culture dishes and bone slices in single-cell and co-culture settings, confirming the two previous observations that LPS play a bifunctional role in osteoclastogenesis (34, 35). Moreover, we have further shown that the RANKL-mediated lineage commitment is long term and irreversible in LPS-mediated osteoclastogenesis. More importantly, we have revealed that LPS inhibits osteoclastogenesis by suppressing NFATc1 expression and JNK activation while it prolongs osteoclast survival by activating the Akt, NF-κB, and ERK pathways. These studies have not only unambiguously and precisely defined the role of LPS in osteoclastogenesis but, more importantly, may also lead to a paradigm shift in future investigation of the molecular mechanism of periodontal bone loss.     

Engineered Protein Connectivity to Actin Mimics PDZ-dependent Recycling of G Protein-coupled Receptors but Not Its Regulation by Hrs

Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) recycle after agonist-induced endocytosis by a sequence-dependent mechanism, which is distinct from default membrane flow and remains poorly understood. Efficient recycling of the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) requires a C-terminal PDZ (PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (PDZbd), an intact actin cytoskeleton, and is regulated by the endosomal protein Hrs (hepatocyte growth factor-regulated substrate). The PDZbd is thought to link receptors to actin through a series of protein interaction modules present in NHERF/EBP50 (Na⁺/H+ exchanger 3 regulatory factor/ezrin-binding phosphoprotein of 50 kDa) family and ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) family proteins. It is not known, however, if such actin connectivity is sufficient to recapitulate the natural features of sequence-dependent recycling. We addressed this question using a receptor fusion approach based on the sufficiency of the PDZbd to promote recycling when fused to a distinct GPCR, the δ-opioid receptor, which normally recycles inefficiently in HEK293 cells. Modular domains mediating actin connectivity promoted receptor recycling with similarly high efficiency as the PDZbd itself, and recycling promoted by all of the domains was actin-dependent. Regulation of receptor recycling by Hrs, however, was conferred only by the PDZbd and not by downstream interaction modules. These results suggest that actin connectivity is sufficient to mimic the core recycling activity of a GPCR-linked PDZbd but not its cellular regulation.G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)² comprise the largest family of transmembrane signaling receptors expressed in animals and transduce a wide variety of physiological and pharmacological information. While these receptors share a common 7-transmembrane-spanning topology, structural differences between individual GPCR family members confer diverse functional and regulatory properties (1-4). A fundamental mechanism of GPCR regulation involves agonist-induced endocytosis of receptors via clathrin-coated pits (4). Regulated endocytosis can have multiple functional consequences, which are determined in part by the specificity with which internalized receptors traffic via divergent downstream membrane pathways (5-7).Trafficking of internalized GPCRs to lysosomes, a major pathway traversed by the δ-opioid receptor (δOR), contributes to proteolytic down-regulation of receptor number and produces a prolonged attenuation of subsequent cellular responsiveness to agonist (8, 9). Trafficking of internalized GPCRs via a rapid recycling pathway, a major route traversed by the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), restores the complement of functional receptors present on the cell surface and promotes rapid recovery of cellular signaling responsiveness (6, 10, 11). When co-expressed in the same cells, the δOR and β2AR are efficiently sorted between these divergent downstream membrane pathways, highlighting the occurrence of specific molecular sorting of GPCRs after endocytosis (12).Recycling of various integral membrane proteins can occur by default, essentially by bulk membrane flow in the absence of lysosomal sorting determinants (13). There is increasing evidence that various GPCRs, such as the β2AR, require distinct cytoplasmic determinants to recycle efficiently (14). In addition to requiring a cytoplasmic sorting determinant, sequence-dependent recycling of the β2AR differs from default recycling in its dependence on an intact actin cytoskeleton and its regulation by the conserved endosomal sorting protein Hrs (hepatocyte growth factor receptor substrate) (11, 14). Compared with the present knowledge regarding protein complexes that mediate sorting of GPCRs to lysosomes (15, 16), however, relatively little is known about the biochemical basis of sequence-directed recycling or its regulation.The β2AR-derived recycling sequence conforms to a canonical PDZ (PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1) protein-binding determinant (henceforth called PDZbd), and PDZ-mediated protein association(s) with this sequence appear to be primarily responsible for its endocytic sorting activity (17-20). Fusion of this sequence to the cytoplasmic tail of the δOR effectively re-routes endocytic trafficking of engineered receptors from lysosomal to recycling pathways, establishing the sufficiency of the PDZbd to function as a transplantable sorting determinant (18). The β2AR-derived PDZbd binds with relatively high specificity to the NHERF/EBP50 family of PDZ proteins (21, 22). A well-established biochemical function of NHERF/EBP50 family proteins is to associate integral membrane proteins with actin-associated cytoskeletal elements. This is achieved through a series of protein-interaction modules linking NHERF/EBP50 family proteins to ERM (ezrin-radixin-moesin) family proteins and, in turn, to actin filaments (23-26). Such indirect actin connectivity is known to mediate other effects on plasma membrane organization and function (23), however, and NHERF/EBP50 family proteins can bind to additional proteins potentially important for endocytic trafficking of receptors (23, 25). Thus it remains unclear if actin connectivity is itself sufficient to promote sequence-directed recycling of GPCRs and, if so, if such connectivity recapitulates the normal cellular regulation of sequence-dependent recycling. In the present study, we took advantage of the modular nature of protein connectivity proposed to mediate β2AR recycling (24, 26), and extended the opioid receptor fusion strategy used successfully for identifying diverse recycling sequences in GPCRs (27-29), to address these fundamental questions.Here we show that the recycling activity of the β2AR-derived PDZbd can be effectively bypassed by linking receptors to ERM family proteins in the absence of the PDZbd itself. Further, we establish that the protein connectivity network can be further simplified by fusing receptors to an interaction module that binds directly to actin filaments. We found that bypassing the PDZ-mediated interaction using either domain is sufficient to mimic the ability of the PDZbd to promote efficient, actin-dependent recycling of receptors. Hrs-dependent regulation, however, which is characteristic of sequence-dependent recycling of wild-type receptors, was recapitulated only by the fused PDZbd and not by the proposed downstream interaction modules. These results support a relatively simple architecture of protein connectivity that is sufficient to mimic the core recycling activity of the β2AR-derived PDZbd, but not its characteristic cellular regulation. Given that an increasing number of GPCRs have been shown to bind PDZ proteins that typically link directly or indirectly to cytoskeletal elements (17, 27, 30-32), the present results also suggest that actin connectivity may represent a common biochemical principle underlying sequence-dependent recycling of various GPCRs.     

Overexpression of E-cadherin on Melanoma Cells Inhibits Chemokine-promoted Invasion Involving p190RhoGAP/p120ctn-dependent Inactivation of RhoA

Melanoma cells express the chemokine receptor CXCR4 that confers high invasiveness upon binding to its ligand CXCL12. Melanoma cells at initial stages of the disease show reduction or loss of E-cadherin expression, but recovery of its expression is frequently found at advanced phases. We overexpressed E-cadherin in the highly invasive BRO lung metastatic cell melanoma cell line to investigate whether it could influence CXCL12-promoted cell invasion. Overexpression of E-cadherin led to defective invasion of melanoma cells across Matrigel and type I collagen in response to CXCL12. A decrease in individual cell migration directionality toward the chemokine and reduced adhesion accounted for the impaired invasion. A p190RhoGAP-dependent inhibition of RhoA activation was responsible for the impairment in chemokine-stimulated E-cadherin melanoma transfectant invasion. Furthermore, we show that p190RhoGAP and p120ctn associated predominantly on the plasma membrane of cells overexpressing E-cadherin, and that E-cadherin-bound p120ctn contributed to RhoA inactivation by favoring p190RhoGAP-RhoA association. These results suggest that melanoma cells at advanced stages of the disease could have reduced metastatic potency in response to chemotactic stimuli compared with cells lacking E-cadherin, and the results indicate that p190RhoGAP is a central molecule controlling melanoma cell invasion.Cadherins are a family of Ca²⁺-dependent adhesion molecules that mediate cell-cell contacts and are expressed in most solid tissues providing a tight control of morphogenesis (1, 2). Classical cadherins, such as epithelial (E) cadherin, are found in adherens junctions, forming core protein complexes with β-catenin, α-catenin, and p120 catenin (p120ctn). Both β-catenin and p120ctn directly interact with E-cadherin, whereas α-catenin associates with the complex through its binding to β-catenin, providing a link with the actin cytoskeleton (1, 2). E-cadherin is frequently lost or down-regulated in many human tumors, coincident with morphological epithelial to mesenchymal transition and acquisition of invasiveness (3-6).Although melanoma only accounts for 5% of skin cancers, when metastasis starts, it is responsible for 80% of deaths from skin cancers (7). Melanocytes express E-cadherin (8-10), but melanoma cells at early radial growth phase show a large reduction in the expression of this cadherin, and surprisingly, expression has been reported to be partially recovered by vertical growth phase and metastatic melanoma cells (9, 11, 12).Trafficking of cancer cells from primary tumor sites to intravasation into blood circulation and later to extravasation to colonize distant organs requires tightly regulated directional cues and cell migration and invasion that are mediated by chemokines, growth factors, and adhesion molecules (13). Solid tumor cells express chemokine receptors that provide guidance of these cells to organs where their chemokine ligands are expressed, constituting a homing model resembling the one used by immune cells to exert their immune surveillance functions (14). Most solid cancer cells express CXCR4, a receptor for the chemokine CXCL12 (also called SDF-1), which is expressed in lungs, bone marrow, and liver (15). Expression of CXCR4 in human melanoma has been detected in the vertical growth phase and on regional lymph nodes, which correlated with poor prognosis and increased mortality (16, 17). Previous in vivo experiments have provided evidence supporting a crucial role for CXCR4 in the metastasis of melanoma cells (18).Rho GTPases control the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton during cell migration (19, 20). The activity of Rho GTPases is tightly regulated by guanine-nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs),⁴ which stimulate exchange of bound GDP by GTP, and inhibited by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which promote GTP hydrolysis (21, 22), whereas guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) appear to mediate blocking of spontaneous activation (23). Therefore, cell migration is finely regulated by the balance between GEF, GAP, and GDI activities on Rho GTPases. Involvement of Rho GTPases in cancer is well documented (reviewed in Ref. 24), providing control of both cell migration and growth. RhoA and RhoC are highly expressed in colon, breast, and lung carcinoma (25, 26), whereas overexpression of RhoC in melanoma leads to enhancement of cell metastasis (27). CXCL12 activates both RhoA and Rac1 in melanoma cells, and both GTPases play key roles during invasion toward this chemokine (28, 29).Given the importance of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in melanoma cell invasion and metastasis, in this study we have addressed the question of whether changes in E-cadherin expression on melanoma cells might affect cell invasiveness. We show here that overexpression of E-cadherin leads to impaired melanoma cell invasion to CXCL12, and we provide mechanistic characterization accounting for the decrease in invasion.     

Intersectin Regulates Dendritic Spine Development and Somatodendritic Endocytosis but Not Synaptic Vesicle Recycling in Hippocampal Neurons

Intersectin-short (intersectin-s) is a multimodule scaffolding protein functioning in constitutive and regulated forms of endocytosis in non-neuronal cells and in synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans. In vertebrates, alternative splicing generates a second isoform, intersectin-long (intersectin-l), that contains additional modular domains providing a guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity for Cdc42. In mammals, intersectin-s is expressed in multiple tissues and cells, including glia, but excluded from neurons, whereas intersectin-l is a neuron-specific isoform. Thus, intersectin-I may regulate multiple forms of endocytosis in mammalian neurons, including SV endocytosis. We now report, however, that intersectin-l is localized to somatodendritic regions of cultured hippocampal neurons, with some juxtanuclear accumulation, but is excluded from synaptophysin-labeled axon terminals. Consistently, intersectin-l knockdown (KD) does not affect SV recycling. Instead intersectin-l co-localizes with clathrin heavy chain and adaptor protein 2 in the somatodendritic region of neurons, and its KD reduces the rate of transferrin endocytosis. The protein also co-localizes with F-actin at dendritic spines, and intersectin-l KD disrupts spine maturation during development. Our data indicate that intersectin-l is indeed an important regulator of constitutive endocytosis and neuronal development but that it is not a prominent player in the regulated endocytosis of SVs.Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME)⁴ is a major mechanism by which cells take up nutrients, control the surface levels of multiple proteins, including ion channels and transporters, and regulate the coupling of signaling receptors to downstream signaling cascades (1-5). In neurons, CME takes on additional specialized roles; it is an important process regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) availability through endocytosis and recycling of SV membranes (6, 7), it shapes synaptic plasticity (8-10), and it is crucial in maintaining synaptic membranes and membrane structure (11).Numerous endocytic accessory proteins participate in CME, interacting with each other and with core components of the endocytic machinery such as clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) through specific modules and peptide motifs (12). One such module is the Eps15 homology domain that binds to proteins bearing NPF motifs (13, 14). Another is the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, which binds to proline-rich domains in protein partners (15). Intersectin is a multimodule scaffolding protein that interacts with a wide range of proteins, including several involved in CME (16). Intersectin has two N-terminal Eps15 homology domains that are responsible for binding to epsin, SCAMP1, and numb (17-19), a central coil-coiled domain that interacts with Eps15 and SNAP-23 and -25 (17, 20, 21), and five SH3 domains in its C-terminal region that interact with multiple proline-rich domain proteins, including synaptojanin, dynamin, N-WASP, CdGAP, and mSOS (16, 22-25). The rich binding capability of intersectin has linked it to various functions from CME (17, 26, 27) and signaling (22, 28, 29) to mitogenesis (30, 31) and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (23).Intersectin functions in SV recycling at the neuromuscular junction of Drosophila and C. elegans where it acts as a scaffold, regulating the synaptic levels of endocytic accessory proteins (21, 32-34). In vertebrates, the intersectin gene is subject to alternative splicing, and a longer isoform (intersectin-l) is generated that is expressed exclusively in neurons (26, 28, 35, 36). This isoform has all the binding modules of its short (intersectin-s) counterpart but also has additional domains: a DH and a PH domain that provide guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity specific for Cdc42 (23, 37) and a C2 domain at the C terminus. Through its GEF activity and binding to actin regulatory proteins, including N-WASP, intersectin-l has been implicated in actin regulation and the development of dendritic spines (19, 23, 24). In addition, because the rest of the binding modules are shared between intersectin-s and -l, it is generally thought that the two intersectin isoforms have the same endocytic functions. In particular, given the well defined role for the invertebrate orthologs of intersectin-s in SV endocytosis, it is thought that intersectin-l performs this role in mammalian neurons, which lack intersectin-s. Defining the complement of intersectin functional activities in mammalian neurons is particularly relevant given that the protein is involved in the pathophysiology of Down syndrome (DS). Specifically, the intersectin gene is localized on chromosome 21q22.2 and is overexpressed in DS brains (38). Interestingly, alterations in endosomal pathways are a hallmark of DS neurons and neurons from the partial trisomy 16 mouse, Ts65Dn, a model for DS (39, 40). Thus, an endocytic trafficking defect may contribute to the DS disease process.Here, the functional roles of intersectin-l were studied in cultured hippocampal neurons. We find that intersectin-l is localized to the somatodendritic regions of neurons, where it co-localizes with CHC and AP-2 and regulates the uptake of transferrin. Intersectin-l also co-localizes with actin at dendritic spines and disrupting intersectin-l function alters dendritic spine development. In contrast, intersectin-l is absent from presynaptic terminals and has little or no role in SV recycling.     

Loss of PINK1 Function Promotes Mitophagy through Effects on Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Fission

Mitochondrial dysregulation is strongly implicated in Parkinson disease. Mutations in PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) are associated with familial parkinsonism and neuropsychiatric disorders. Although overexpressed PINK1 is neuroprotective, less is known about neuronal responses to loss of PINK1 function. We found that stable knockdown of PINK1 induced mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells, which was reversed by the reintroduction of an RNA interference (RNAi)-resistant plasmid for PINK1. Moreover, stable or transient overexpression of wild-type PINK1 increased mitochondrial interconnectivity and suppressed toxin-induced autophagy/mitophagy. Mitochondrial oxidant production played an essential role in triggering mitochondrial fragmentation and autophagy in PINK1 shRNA lines. Autophagy/mitophagy served a protective role in limiting cell death, and overexpressing Parkin further enhanced this protective mitophagic response. The dominant negative Drp1 mutant inhibited both fission and mitophagy in PINK1-deficient cells. Interestingly, RNAi knockdown of autophagy proteins Atg7 and LC3/Atg8 also decreased mitochondrial fragmentation without affecting oxidative stress, suggesting active involvement of autophagy in morphologic remodeling of mitochondria for clearance. To summarize, loss of PINK1 function elicits oxidative stress and mitochondrial turnover coordinated by the autophagic and fission/fusion machineries. Furthermore, PINK1 and Parkin may cooperate through different mechanisms to maintain mitochondrial homeostasis.Parkinson disease is an age-related neurodegenerative disease that affects ∼1% of the population worldwide. The causes of sporadic cases are unknown, although mitochondrial or oxidative toxins such as 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA),³ and rotenone reproduce features of the disease in animal and cell culture models (1). Abnormalities in mitochondrial respiration and increased oxidative stress are observed in cells and tissues from parkinsonian patients (2, 3), which also exhibit increased mitochondrial autophagy (4). Furthermore, mutations in parkinsonian genes affect oxidative stress response pathways and mitochondrial homeostasis (5). Thus, disruption of mitochondrial homeostasis represents a major factor implicated in the pathogenesis of sporadic and inherited parkinsonian disorders (PD).The PARK6 locus involved in autosomal recessive and early-onset PD encodes for PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) (6, 7). PINK1 is a cytosolic and mitochondrially localized 581-amino acid serine/threonine kinase that possesses an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence (6, 8). The primary sequence also includes a putative transmembrane domain important for orientation of the PINK1 domain (8), a conserved kinase domain homologous to calcium calmodulin kinases, and a C-terminal domain that regulates autophosphorylation activity (9, 10). Overexpression of wild-type PINK1, but not its PD-associated mutants, protects against several toxic insults in neuronal cells (6, 11, 12). Mitochondrial targeting is necessary for some (13) but not all of the neuroprotective effects of PINK1 (14), implicating involvement of cytoplasmic targets that modulate mitochondrial pathobiology (8). PINK1 catalytic activity is necessary for its neuroprotective role, because a kinase-deficient K219M substitution in the ATP binding pocket of PINK1 abrogates its ability to protect neurons (14). Although PINK1 mutations do not seem to impair mitochondrial targeting, PD-associated mutations differentially destabilize the protein, resulting in loss of neuroprotective activities (13, 15).Recent studies indicate that PINK1 and Parkin interact genetically (3, 16-18) to prevent oxidative stress (19, 20) and regulate mitochondrial morphology (21). Primary cells derived from PINK1 mutant patients exhibit mitochondrial fragmentation with disorganized cristae, recapitulated by RNA interference studies in HeLa cells (3).Mitochondria are degraded by macroautophagy, a process involving sequestration of cytoplasmic cargo into membranous autophagic vacuoles (AVs) for delivery to lysosomes (22, 23). Interestingly, mitochondrial fission accompanies autophagic neurodegeneration elicited by the PD neurotoxin 6-OHDA (24, 25). Moreover, mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy are observed in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases (4, 26-28). Although inclusion of mitochondria in autophagosomes was once believed to be a random process, as observed during starvation, studies involving hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, apoptotic stimuli, or limiting amounts of aerobic substrates in facultative anaerobes support the concept of selective mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) (29, 30). In particular, mitochondrially localized kinases may play an important role in models involving oxidative mitochondrial injury (25, 31, 32).Autophagy is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates (33-35) and normal regulation of axonal-synaptic morphology (36). Chronic disruption of lysosomal function results in accumulation of subtly impaired mitochondria with decreased calcium buffering capacity (37), implicating an important role for autophagy in mitochondrial homeostasis (37, 38). Recently, Parkin, which complements the effects of PINK1 deficiency on mitochondrial morphology (3), was found to promote autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (39). Conversely, Beclin 1-independent autophagy/mitophagy contributes to cell death elicited by the PD toxins 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium and 6-OHDA (25, 28, 31, 32), causing neurite retraction in cells expressing a PD-linked mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (40). Whereas properly regulated autophagy plays a homeostatic and neuroprotective role, excessive or incomplete autophagy creates a condition of “autophagic stress” that can contribute to neurodegeneration (28).As mitochondrial fragmentation (3) and increased mitochondrial autophagy (4) have been described in human cells or tissues of PD patients, we investigated whether or not the engineered loss of PINK1 function could recapitulate these observations in human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). Stable knockdown of endogenous PINK1 gave rise to mitochondrial fragmentation and increased autophagy and mitophagy, whereas stable or transient overexpression of PINK1 had the opposite effect. Autophagy/mitophagy was dependent upon increased mitochondrial oxidant production and activation of fission. The data indicate that PINK1 is important for the maintenance of mitochondrial networks, suggesting that coordinated regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy limits cell death associated with loss of PINK1 function.     

Interdomain Flexibility in Full-length Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1)

The presence of extensive reciprocal conformational freedom between the catalytic and the hemopexin-like domains of full-length matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) is demonstrated by NMR and small angle x-ray scattering experiments. This finding is discussed in relation to the essentiality of the hemopexin-like domain for the collagenolytic activity of MMP-1. The conformational freedom experienced by the present system, having the shortest linker between the two domains, when compared with similar findings on MMP-12 and MMP-9 having longer and the longest linker within the family, respectively, suggests this type of conformational freedom to be a general property of all MMPs.Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)² are extracellular hydrolytic enzymes involved in a variety of processes including connective tissue cleavage and remodeling (1–3). All 23 members of the family are able to cleave simple peptides derived from connective tissue components such as collagen, gelatin, elastin, etc. A subset of MMPs is able to hydrolyze more resistant polymeric substrates, such as cross-linked elastin, and partially degraded collagen forms, such as gelatin and type IV collagens (4). Intact triple helical type I–III collagen is only attacked by collagenases MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-13 and by MMP-2 and MMP-14 (5–12). Although the detailed mechanism of cleavage of single chain peptides by MMP has been largely elucidated (13–19), little is known about the process of hydrolysis of triple helical collagen. In fact, triple helical collagen cannot be accommodated in the substrate-binding groove of the catalytic site of MMPs (9).All MMPs (but MMP-7) in their active form are constituted by a catalytic domain (CAT) and a hemopexin-like domain (HPX) (20–22). The CAT domain contains two zinc ions and one to three calcium ions. One zinc ion is at the catalytic site and is responsible for the activity, whereas the other metal ions have structural roles. The isolated CAT domains retain full catalytic activity toward simple peptides and single chain polymeric substrates such as elastin, whereas hydrolysis of triple helical collagen also requires the presence of the HPX domain (9, 23–25). It has been shown that the isolated CAT domain regains a small fraction of the activity of the full-length (FL) protein when high amounts of either inactivated full-length proteins or isolated HPX domains are added to the assay solution (9). Finally, it has been shown that the presence of the HPX domain alone alters the CD spectrum of triple helical collagen in a way that suggests its partial unwinding (26, 27). It is tempting to speculate that full-length collagenases attack collagen by first locally unwinding the triple helical structure with the help of the HPX domain and then cleaving the resulting, exposed, single filaments (9, 28).Until 2007, three-dimensional structures of full-length MMPs had been reported only for collagenase MMP-1 (29–31) and gelatinase MMP-2 (32). The structures of the two proteins are very similar and show a compact arrangement of the two domains, which are connected by a short linker (14 and 20 amino acids, respectively). It is difficult to envisage that rigid and compact molecules of this type can interact with triple helical collagen in a way that can lead to first unwinding and then cleavage of individual filaments. It has been recently suggested that such concerted action could occur much more easily if the two domains could enjoy at least a partial conformational independence (9). Slight differences in the reciprocal orientation of the CAT and HPX domains of MMP-1 in the presence (29) and absence (30, 31) of the prodomain were indeed taken as a hint that the two domains could experience relative mobility (29).Two recent solution studies have shown that conformational independence is indeed occurring in gelatinase MMP-9 (33) and elastase MMP-12 (34), whereas the x-ray structure of the latter (34) is only slightly less compact than those of MMP-1 (29–31) and MMP-2 (32). Among MMPs, MMP-9 features an exceptionally long linker (68 amino acid) (33, 35), which in fact constitutes a small domain by itself (the O-glycosylated domain) (33), and therefore, this inspiring observation can hardly be taken as evidence that conformational freedom is a general characteristic of the two-domain MMPs. MMP-12 features a much more normal 16-amino acid linker, thereby making more probable a general functional role for this conformational freedom (34). However, both MMP-9 and MMP-12 retain their full catalytic activity against their substrates even when deprived of the HPX domain (9). Therefore, the question remains of whether conformational freedom is also a required characteristic for those MMPs that are only active as full-length proteins, i.e. collagenases. Interestingly, the three collagenases (MMP-1, MMP-8, and MMP-13) have the shortest linker (14 amino acids) among all MMPs. Demonstrating or negating the presence of conformational freedom in one of these collagenases would therefore constitute a significant step forward to formulate mechanistic hypotheses on their collagenolytic activity.Our recent studies on MMP-12 in solution (34) have shown that a combination of NMR relaxation studies and small angle x-ray scattering (SAXS) is enough to show the presence and the extent of the relative conformational freedom of the two domains of MMPs. Here we apply the same strategy to full-length MMP-1 and show that sizable conformational freedom is indeed experienced even by this prototypical collagenase, although somewhat less pronounced than that observed for MMP-12.     

The Myosin-binding Protein C Motif Binds to F-actin in a Phosphorylation-sensitive Manner

Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) is a regulatory protein expressed in cardiac sarcomeres that is known to interact with myosin, titin, and actin. cMyBP-C modulates actomyosin interactions in a phosphorylation-dependent way, but it is unclear whether interactions with myosin, titin, or actin are required for these effects. Here we show using cosedimentation binding assays, that the 4 N-terminal domains of murine cMyBP-C (i.e. C0-C1-m-C2) bind to F-actin with a dissociation constant (K_d) of ∼10 μm and a molar binding ratio (B_max) near 1.0, indicating 1:1 (mol/mol) binding to actin. Electron microscopy and light scattering analyses show that these domains cross-link F-actin filaments, implying multiple sites of interaction with actin. Phosphorylation of the MyBP-C regulatory motif, or m-domain, reduced binding to actin (reduced B_max) and eliminated actin cross-linking. These results suggest that the N terminus of cMyBP-C interacts with F-actin through multiple distinct binding sites and that binding at one or more sites is reduced by phosphorylation. Reversible interactions with actin could contribute to effects of cMyBP-C to increase cross-bridge cycling.Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C)² is a thick filament accessory protein that performs both structural and regulatory functions within vertebrate sarcomeres. Both roles are likely to be essential in deciphering how a growing number of mutations found in the cMyBP-C gene, i.e. MYBPC3, lead to cardiomyopathies and heart failure in a substantial number of the world''s population (1, 2).Considerable progress has recently been made in determining the regulatory functions of cMyBP-C and it is now apparent that cMyBP-C normally limits cross-bridge cycling kinetics and is critical for cardiac function (3-5). Phosphorylation of cMyBP-C is essential for its regulatory effects because elimination of phosphorylation sites (serine to alanine substitutions) abolishes the ability of protein kinase A (PKA) to accelerate cross-bridge cycling kinetics and blunts cardiac responses to inotropic stimuli (6). The substitutions further impair cardiac function, reduce contractile reserve, and cause cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic mice (6, 7). By contrast, substitution of aspartic acids at these sites to mimic constitutive phosphorylation is benign or cardioprotective (8).Although a role for cMyBP-C in modulating cross-bridge kinetics is supported by several transgenic and knock-out mouse models (6, 7, 9, 10), the precise mechanisms by which cMyBP-C exerts these effects are not completely understood. For instance, the unique regulatory motif or “m-domain” of cMyBP-C binds to the S2 subfragment of myosin in vitro (11) and binding is abolished by PKA-mediated phosphorylation of the m-domain (12). These observations have led to the idea that (un)binding of the m-domain from myosin S2 mediates PKA-induced increases in cross-bridge cycling kinetics. Consistent with this idea, Calaghan and colleagues (13) showed that S2 added to transiently permeabilized myocytes increased their contractility, presumably because added S2 displaced cMyBP-C from binding endogenous S2. However, other reports indicate that cMyBP-C can influence actomyosin interactions through mechanisms unrelated to S2 binding, because either purified cMyBP-C (14) or recombinant N-terminal domains of cMyBP-C (15) affected acto-S1 filament sliding velocities and ATPase rates in the absence of myosin S2. These results thus raise the possibility that interactions with ligands other than myosin S2, such as actin or myosin S1, contribute to effects of cMyBP-C on cross-bridge interaction kinetics.The idea that cMyBP-C interacts with actin to influence cross-bridge cycling kinetics is supported by several studies that implicate the regulatory m-domain or sequences near it in actin binding (16-19). cMyBP-C is a member of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily of proteins and consists of 11 repeating domains that bear homology to either Ig or fibronectin-like folds. Domains are numbered sequentially from the N terminus of cMyBP-C as C0 through C10. The m-domain, a unique sequence of ∼100 amino acids, is located between domains C1 and C2 and is phosphorylated on at least 3 serine residues by PKA (12). Although the precise structure of the m-domain is not known, small angle x-ray scattering data suggest that it is compact and folded in solution and is thus similar in size and dimensions to the surrounding Ig domains (20). Recombinant proteins encompassing the m-domain and/or a combination of adjacent domains including C0, C1, C2, and a proline-alanine-rich sequence that links C0 to C1 have been shown to bind actin (16, 18, 19).The purpose of the present study was to characterize binding interactions of the N terminus of cMyBP-C with actin and to determine whether interactions with actin are influenced by phosphorylation of the m-domain. Results demonstrate that the N terminus of cMyBP-C binds to F-actin and to native thin filaments with affinities similar to that reported for cMyBP-C binding to myosin S2 (11). Furthermore, actin binding was reduced by m-domain phosphorylation, suggesting that reversible interactions of cMyBP-C with actin could contribute to modulation of cross-bridge kinetics.     

Bortezomib Overcomes Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Apoptosis-inducing Ligand Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells in Part through the Inhibition of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive human malignancies. Recombinant tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a promising anti-tumor agent. However, many HCC cells show resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we showed that bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells, including Huh-7, Hep3B, and Sk-Hep1. The combination of bortezomib and TRAIL restored the sensitivity of HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Comparing the molecular change in HCC cells treated with these agents, we found that down-regulation of phospho-Akt (P-Akt) played a key role in mediating TRAIL sensitization of bortezomib. The first evidence was that bortezomib down-regulated P-Akt in a dose- and time-dependent manner in TRAIL-treated HCC cells. Second, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY294002","term_id":"1257998346","term_text":"LY294002"}}LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, also sensitized resistant HCC cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Third, knocking down Akt1 by small interference RNA also enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in Huh-7 cells. Finally, ectopic expression of mutant Akt (constitutive active) in HCC cells abolished TRAIL sensitization effect of bortezomib. Moreover, okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) inhibitor, reversed down-regulation of P-Akt in bortezomib-treated cells, and PP2A knockdown by small interference RNA also reduced apoptosis induced by the combination of TRAIL and bortezomib, indicating that PP2A may be important in mediating the effect of bortezomib on TRAIL sensitization. Together, bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance at clinically achievable concentrations in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and this effect is mediated at least partly via inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)² is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. To date, surgery is still the only curative treatment but is only feasible in a small portion of patients (1). Drug treatment is the major therapy for patients with advanced stage disease. Unfortunately, the response rate to traditional chemotherapy for HCC patients is unsatisfactory (1). Novel pharmacological therapy is urgently needed for patients with advanced HCC. In this regard, the approval of sorafenib might open a new era of molecularly targeted therapy in the treatment of HCC patients.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a type II transmembrane protein and a member of the TNF family, is a promising anti-tumor agent under clinical investigation (2). TRAIL functions by engaging its receptors expressed on the surface of target cells. Five receptors specific for TRAIL have been identified, including DR4/TRAIL-R1, DR5/TRAIL-R2, DcR1, DcR2, and osteoprotegerin. Among TRAIL receptors, only DR4 and DR5 contain an effective death domain that is essential to formation of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), a critical step for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Notably, the trimerization of the death domains recruits an adaptor molecule, Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD), which subsequently recruits and activates caspase-8. In type I cells, activation of caspase-8 is sufficient to activate caspase-3 to induce apoptosis; however, in another type of cells (type II), the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway is essential for apoptosis characterized by cleavage of Bid and release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which subsequently activates caspase-9 and caspase-3 (3).Although TRAIL induces apoptosis in malignant cells but sparing normal cells, some tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms responsible for the resistance include receptors and intracellular resistance. Although the cell surface expression of DR4 or DR5 is absolutely required for TRAIL-induced apoptosis, tumor cells expressing these death receptors are not always sensitive to TRAIL due to intracellular mechanisms. For example, the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), a homologue to caspase-8 but without protease activity, has been linked to TRAIL resistance in several studies (4, 5). In addition, inactivation of Bax, a proapoptotic Bcl-2 family protein, resulted in resistance to TRAIL in MMR-deficient tumors (6, 7), and reintroduction of Bax into Bax-deficient cells restored TRAIL sensitivity (8), indicating that the Bcl-2 family plays a critical role in intracellular mechanisms for resistance of TRAIL.Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor approved clinically for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma, has been investigated intensively for many types of cancer (9). Accumulating studies indicate that the combination of bortezomib and TRAIL overcomes the resistance to TRAIL in various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (4), lymphoma (10–13), prostate (14–17), colon (15, 18, 19), bladder (14, 16), renal cell carcinoma (20), thyroid (21), ovary (22), non-small cell lung (23, 24), sarcoma (25), and HCC (26, 27). Molecular targets responsible for the sensitizing effect of bortezomib on TRAIL-induced cell death include DR4 (14, 27), DR5 (14, 20, 22–23, 28), c-FLIP (4, 11, 21–23, 29), NF-κB (12, 24, 30), p21 (16, 21, 25), and p27 (25). In addition, Bcl-2 family also plays a role in the combinational effect of bortezomib and TRAIL, including Bcl-2 (10, 21), Bax (13, 22), Bak (27), Bcl-xL (21), Bik (18), and Bim (15).Recently, we have reported that Akt signaling is a major molecular determinant in bortezomib-induced apoptosis in HCC cells (31). In this study, we demonstrated that bortezomib overcame TRAIL resistance in HCC cells through inhibition of the PI3K/Akt pathway.     

Strain-induced Proliferation Requires the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT/Glycogen Synthase Kinase Pathway

The intestinal epithelium is repetitively deformed by shear, peristalsis, and villous motility. Such repetitive deformation stimulates the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells on collagen or laminin substrates via ERK, but the upstream mediators of this effect are poorly understood. We hypothesized that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT cascade mediates this mitogenic effect. PI3K, AKT, and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) were phosphorylated by 10 cycles/min strain at an average 10% deformation, and pharmacologic blockade of these molecules or reduction by small interfering RNA (siRNA) prevented the mitogenic effect of strain in Caco-2 or IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells. Strain MAPK activation required PI3K but not AKT. AKT isoform-specific siRNA transfection demonstrated that AKT2 but not AKT1 is required for GSK-3β phosphorylation and the strain mitogenic effect. Furthermore, overexpression of AKT1 or an AKT chimera including the PH domain and hinge region of AKT2 and the catalytic domain and C-tail of AKT1 prevented strain activation of GSK-3β, but overexpression of AKT2 or a chimera including the PH domain and hinge region of AKT1 and the catalytic domain and C-tail of AKT2 did not. These data delineate a role for PI3K, AKT2, and GSK-3β in the mitogenic effect of strain. PI3K is required for both ERK and AKT2 activation, whereas AKT2 is sequentially required for GSK-3β. Furthermore, AKT2 specificity requires its catalytic domain and tail region. Manipulating this pathway may prevent mucosal atrophy and maintain the mucosal barrier in conditions such as ileus, sepsis, and prolonged fasting when peristalsis and villous motility are decreased and the mucosal barrier fails.Mechanical forces are part of the normal intestinal epithelial environment. Numerous different forces deform these cells including shear stress from endoluminal chyme, bowel peristalsis, and villous motility (1, 2). During normal bowel function the mucosa is subjected to injury that must be repaired to maintain the mucosal barrier (3, 4). Deformation patterns of the bowel are altered in conditions such as prolonged fasting, post-surgical ileus, and sepsis states, resulting in profoundly reduced mucosal deformation. When such states are prolonged, proliferation slows, the mucosa becomes atrophic, and bacterial translocation may ensue as the mucosal barrier of the gut breaks down (5–7).In vitro, repetitive deformation is trophic for intestinal epithelial cells (8) cultured on type I or type IV collagen or laminin. Human Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells (9), non-transformed rat IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells (10), and primary human intestinal epithelial cells isolated from surgical specimens (11) proliferate more rapidly in response to cyclic strain (12) unless substantial quantities of fibronectin are added to the media or matrix (11) to mimic the acute phase reaction of acute or chronic inflammation and injury. Cyclic strain also stimulates proliferation in HCT 116 colon cancer cells (13) and differentiation of Caco-2 cells cultured on a collagen substrate (9). This phenomenon has also been observed in vivo (14). Thus, repetitive deformation may help to maintain the normal homeostasis of the gut mucosa under non-inflammatory conditions. Previous work in our laboratory has implicated Src, focal adhesion kinase, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)² extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) in the mitogenic effect of strain (10). Although p38 is also activated in Caco-2 cells subjected to cyclic strain on a collagen matrix, its activity is not required for the mitogenic effect of strain (12).Although often the PI3K/AKT pathway is thought of as a parallel pathway to the MAPK, this is not always the case. Protein kinase C isoenzymes differentially modulate thrombin effect on MAPK-dependent retinal pigment epithelial cell (RPE) proliferation, and it has been shown that PI3K or AKT inhibition prevented thrombin-induced ERK activation and RPE proliferation (15).PI3K, AKT, and glycogen synthase kinase (GSK), a downstream target of AKT (16), have been implemented in intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in numerous cell systems not involving strain (17–19) including uncontrolled proliferation in gastrointestinal cancers (20–22). Mechanical forces activate this pathway as well. PI3K and AKT are required for increased extracellular pressure to stimulate colon cancer cell adhesion (23), although the pathway by which pressure stimulates colon cancer cells in suspension differs from the response of adherent intestinal epithelial cells to repetitive deformation (24), and GSK is not involved in this effect.³ Repetitive strain also stimulates vascular endothelial cell proliferation via PI3K and AKT (25, 26), whereas respiratory strain stimulates angiogenic responses via PI3K (27). We, therefore, hypothesized that the PI3K/AKT/GSK axis would be involved in the mitogenic effects of repetitive deformation on a collagen matrix.To test this hypothesis, we used the Flexcell apparatus to rhythmically deform Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells. IEC-6 cells were used to confirm key results. A frequency of 10 cycles per min was used, which is similar in order of magnitude to the frequency that the intestinal mucosa might be deformed by peristalsis or villous motility in vivo (28, 29). Mechanical forces such as repetitive deformation are likely cell-type and frequency-specific, as different cell types respond to different frequencies. Vascular endothelial cells respond to frequencies of 60–80 cycles/min (25), whereas intestinal epithelial cells may actually decrease proliferation in response to frequencies of 5 cycles/min (30). We characterized PI3K, AKT, and GSK phosphorylation with strain, blocked these molecules pharmacologically or by siRNA, and delineated the specificity of the AKT effect using isozyme-specific siRNA and transfection of AKT1/2 chimeras. We also characterized the interaction of this pathway with the activation of ERK by strain, which has previously been implicated in the mitogenic response (12).     

Mapping Daunorubicin-binding Sites in the ATP-binding Cassette Transporter MsbA Using Site-specific Quenching by Spin Labels

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters transduce the free energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the mechanical work of substrate translocation across cell membranes. MsbA is an ABC transporter implicated in trafficking lipid A across the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. It has sequence similarity and overlapping substrate specificity with multidrug ABC transporters that export cytotoxic molecules in humans and prokaryotes. Despite rapid advances in structure determination of ABC efflux transporters, little is known regarding the location of substrate-binding sites in the transmembrane segment and the translocation pathway across the membrane. In this study, we have mapped residues proximal to the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site in MsbA using site-specific, ATP-dependent quenching of DNR intrinsic fluorescence by spin labels. In the nucleotide-free MsbA intermediate, DNR-binding residues cluster at the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 at a site accessible from the membrane/water interface and extending into an aqueous chamber formed at the interface between the two transmembrane domains. Binding of a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog inverts the transporter to an outward-facing conformation and relieves DNR quenching by spin labels suggesting DNR exclusion from proximity to the spin labels. The simplest model consistent with our data has DNR entering near an elbow helix parallel to the water/membrane interface, partitioning into the open chamber, and then translocating toward the periplasm upon ATP binding.ATP-binding cassette (ABC)² transporters transduce the energy of ATP hydrolysis to power the movement of a wide range of substrates across the cell membranes (1, 2). They constitute the largest family of prokaryotic transporters, import essential cell nutrients, flip lipids, and export toxic molecules (3). Forty eight human ABC transporters have been identified, including ABCB1, or P-glycoprotein, which is implicated in cross-resistance to drugs and cytotoxic molecules (4, 5). Inherited mutations in these proteins are linked to diseases such as cystic fibrosis, persistent hypoglycemia of infancy, and immune deficiency (6).The functional unit of an ABC transporter consists of four modules. Two highly conserved ABCs or nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) bind and hydrolyze ATP to supply the active energy for transport (7). ABCs drive the mechanical work of proteins with diverse functions ranging from membrane transport to DNA repair (3, 5). Substrate specificity is determined by two transmembrane domains (TMDs) that also provide the translocation pathway across the bilayer (7). Bacterial ABC exporters are expressed as monomers, each consisting of one NBD and one TMD, that dimerize to form the active transporter (3). The number of transmembrane helices and their organization differ significantly between ABC importers and exporters reflecting the divergent structural and chemical nature of their substrates (1, 8, 9). Furthermore, ABC exporters bind substrates directly from the cytoplasm or bilayer inner leaflet and release them to the periplasm or bilayer outer leaflet (10, 11). In contrast, bacterial importers have their substrates delivered to the TMD by a dedicated high affinity substrate-binding protein (12).In Gram-negative bacteria, lipid A trafficking from its synthesis site on the inner membrane to its final destination in the outer membrane requires the ABC transporter MsbA (13). Although MsbA has not been directly shown to transport lipid A, suppression of MsbA activity leads to cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid A and inhibits bacterial growth strongly suggesting a role in translocation (14-16). In addition to this role in lipid A transport, MsbA shares sequence similarity with multidrug ABC transporters such as human ABCB1, LmrA of Lactococcus lactis, and Sav1866 of Staphylococcus aureus (16-19). ABCB1, a prototype of the ABC family, is a plasma membrane protein whose overexpression provides resistance to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer cells (1). LmrA and MsbA have overlapping substrate specificity with ABCB1 suggesting that both proteins can function as drug exporters (18, 20). Indeed, cells expressing MsbA confer resistance to erythromycin and ethidium bromide (21). MsbA can be photolabeled with the ABCB1/LmrA substrate azidopine and can transport Hoechst 33342 ({"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342) across membrane vesicles in an energy-dependent manner (21).The structural mechanics of ABC exporters was revealed from comparison of the MsbA crystal structures in the apo- and nucleotide-bound states as well as from analysis by spin labeling EPR spectroscopy in liposomes (17, 19, 22, 23). The energy harnessed from ATP binding and hydrolysis drives a cycle of NBD association and dissociation that is transmitted to induce reorientation of the TMD from an inward- to outward-facing conformation (17, 19, 22). Large amplitude motion closes the cytoplasmic end of a chamber found at the interface between the two TMDs and opens it to the periplasm (23). These rearrangements lead to significant changes in chamber hydration, which may drive substrate translocation (22).Substrate binding must precede energy input, otherwise the cycle is futile, wasting the energy of ATP hydrolysis without substrate extrusion (7). Consistent with this model, ATP binding reduces ABCB1 substrate affinity, potentially through binding site occlusion (24-26). Furthermore, the TMD substrate-binding event signals the NBD to stimulate ATP hydrolysis increasing transport efficiency (1, 27, 28). However, there is a paucity of information regarding the location of substrate binding, the transport pathway, and the structural basis of substrate recognition by ABC exporters. In vitro studies of MsbA substrate specificity identify a broad range of substrates that stimulate ATPase activity (29). In addition to the putative physiological substrates lipid A and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the ABCB1 substrates Ilmofosine, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342, and verapamil differentially enhance ATP hydrolysis of MsbA (29, 30). Intrinsic MsbA tryptophan (Trp) fluorescence quenching by these putative substrate molecules provides further support of interaction (29).Extensive biochemical analysis of ABCB1 and LmrA provides a general model of substrate binding to ABC efflux exporters. This so-called “hydrophobic cleaner model” describes substrates binding from the inner leaflet of the bilayer and then translocating through the TMD (10, 31, 32). These studies also identified a large number of residues involved in substrate binding and selectivity (33). When these crucial residues are mapped onto the crystal structures of MsbA, a subset of homologous residues clusters to helices 3 and 6 lining the putative substrate pathway (34). Consistent with a role in substrate binding and specificity, simultaneous replacement of two serines (Ser-289 and Ser-290) in helix 6 of MsbA reduces binding and transport of ethidium and taxol, although {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"H33342","term_id":"978759","term_text":"H33342"}}H33342 and erythromycin interactions remain unaffected (34).The tendency of lipophilic substrates to partition into membranes confounds direct analysis of substrate interactions with ABC exporters (35, 36). Such partitioning may promote dynamic collisions with exposed Trp residues and nonspecific cross-linking in photo-affinity labeling experiments. In this study, we utilize a site-specific quenching approach to identify residues in the vicinity of the daunorubicin (DNR)-binding site (37). Although the data on DNR stimulation of ATP hydrolysis is inconclusive (20, 29, 30), the quenching of MsbA Trp fluorescence suggests a specific interaction. Spin labels were introduced along transmembrane helices 3, 4, and 6 of MsbA to assess their ATP-dependent quenching of DNR fluorescence. Residues that quench DNR cluster along the cytoplasmic end of helices 3 and 6 consistent with specific binding of DNR. Furthermore, many of these residues are not lipid-exposed but face the putative substrate chamber formed between the two TMDs. These residues are proximal to two Trps, which likely explains the previously reported quenching (29). Our results suggest DNR partitions to the membrane and then binds MsbA in a manner consistent with the hydrophobic cleaner model. Interpretation in the context of the crystal structures of MsbA identifies a putative translocation pathway through the transmembrane segment.     

Mechanism of Sustained Activation of Ribosomal S6 Kinase (RSK) and ERK by Kaposi Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus ORF45: MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES RETAIN ACTIVE PHOSPHORYLATED ERK AND RSK AND PROTECT THEM FROM DEPHOSPHORYLATION*

As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses exploit diverse cellular signaling machineries, including the mitogen-activated protein-kinase pathway, during their infections. We have demonstrated previously that the open reading frame 45 (ORF45) of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interacts with p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (Kuang, E., Tang, Q., Maul, G. G., and Zhu, F. (2008) J. Virol. 82 ,1838 -1850). Here, we define the mechanism by which ORF45 activates RSKs. We demonstrated that binding of ORF45 to RSK increases the association of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) with RSK, such that ORF45, RSK, and ERK formed high molecular mass protein complexes. We further demonstrated that the complexes shielded active pERK and pRSK from dephosphorylation. As a result, the complex-associated RSK and ERK were activated and sustained at high levels. Finally, we provide evidence that this mechanism contributes to the sustained activation of ERK and RSK in Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus lytic replication.The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)² mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway has been implicated in diverse cellular physiological processes including proliferation, survival, growth, differentiation, and motility (1-4) and is also exploited by a variety of viruses such as Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), human cytomegalovirus, human immunodeficiency virus, respiratory syncytial virus, hepatitis B virus, coxsackie, vaccinia, coronavirus, and influenza virus (5-17). The MAPK kinases relay the extracellular signaling through sequential phosphorylation to an array of cytoplasmic and nuclear substrates to elicit specific responses (1, 2, 18). Phosphorylation of MAPK is reversible. The kinetics of deactivation or duration of signaling dictates diverse biological outcomes (19, 20). For example, sustained but not transient activation of ERK signaling induces the differentiation of PC12 cells into sympathetic-like neurons and transformation of NIH3T3 cells (20-22). During viral infection, a unique biphasic ERK activation has been observed for some viruses (an early transient activation triggered by viral binding or entry and a late sustained activation correlated with viral gene expression), but the responsible viral factors and underlying mechanism for the sustained ERK activation remain largely unknown (5, 8, 13, 23).The p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSKs) are a family of serine/threonine kinases that lie at the terminus of the ERK pathway (1, 24-26). In mammals, four isoforms are known, RSK1 to RSK4. Each one has two catalytically functional kinase domains, the N-terminal kinase domain (NTKD) and C-terminal kinase domain (CTKD) as well as a linker region between the two. The NTKD is responsible for phosphorylation of exogenous substrates, and the CTKD and linker region regulate RSK activation (1, 24, 25). In quiescent cells ERK binds to the docking site in the C terminus of RSK (27-29). Upon mitogen stimulation, ERK is activated by its upstream MAPK/ERK kinase (MEK). The active ERK phosphorylates Thr-359/Ser-363 of RSK in the linker region (amino acid numbers refer to human RSK1) and Thr-573 in the CTKD activation loop. The activated CTKD then phosphorylates Ser-380 in the linker region, creating a docking site for 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1. The 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 phosphorylates Ser-221 of RSK in the activation loop and activates the NTKD. The activated NTKD autophosphorylates the serine residue near the ERK docking site, causing a transient dissociation of active ERK from RSK (25, 26, 28). The stimulation of quiescent cells by a mitogen such as epidermal growth factor or a phorbol ester such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) usually results in a transient RSK activation that lasts less than 30 min. RSKs have been implicated in regulating cell survival, growth, and proliferation. Mutation or aberrant expression of RSK has been implicated in several human diseases including Coffin-Lowry syndrome and prostate and breast cancers (1, 24, 25, 30-32).KSHV is a human DNA tumor virus etiologically linked to Kaposi sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and a subset of multicentric Castleman disease (33, 34). Infection and reactivation of KSHV activate multiple MAPK pathways (6, 12, 35). Noticeably, the ERK/RSK activation is sustained late during KSHV primary infection and reactivation from latency (5, 6, 12, 23), but the mechanism of the sustained ERK/RSK activation is unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that ORF45, an immediate early and also virion tegument protein of KSHV, interacts with RSK1 and RSK2 and strongly stimulates their kinase activities (23). We also demonstrated that the activation of RSK plays an essential role in KSHV lytic replication (23). In the present study we determined the mechanism of ORF45-induced sustained ERK/RSK activation. We found that ORF45 increases the association of RSK with ERK and protects them from dephosphorylation, causing sustained activation of both ERK and RSK.