Rab2 Utilizes Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase and Protein Kinase C�� to Associate with Microtubules and to Recruit Dynein

Rab2 requires glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and atypical protein kinase Cι (aPKCι) for retrograde vesicle formation from vesicular tubular clusters that sort secretory cargo from recycling proteins returned to the endoplasmic reticulum. However, the precise role of GAPDH and aPKCι in the early secretory pathway is unclear. GAPDH was the first glycolytic enzyme reported to co-purify with microtubules (MTs). Similarly, aPKC associates directly with MTs. To learn whether Rab2 also binds directly to MTs, a MT binding assay was performed. Purified Rab2 was found in a MT-enriched pellet only when both GAPDH and aPKCι were present, and Rab2-MT binding could be prevented by a recombinant fragment made to the Rab2 amino terminus (residues 2-70), which directly interacts with GAPDH and aPKCι. Because GAPDH binds to the carboxyl terminus of α-tubulin, we characterized the distribution of tyrosinated/detyrosinated α-tubulin that is recruited by Rab2 in a quantitative membrane binding assay. Rab2-treated membranes contained predominantly tyrosinated α-tubulin; however, aPKCι was the limiting and essential factor. Tyrosination/detyrosination influences MT motor protein binding; therefore, we determined whether Rab2 stimulated kinesin or dynein membrane binding. Although kinesin was not detected on membranes incubated with Rab2, dynein was recruited in a dose-dependent manner, and binding was aPKCι-dependent. These combined results suggest a mechanism by which Rab2 controls MT and motor recruitment to vesicular tubular clusters.The small GTPase Rab2 is essential for membrane trafficking in the early secretory pathway and associates with vesicular tubular clusters (VTCs)² located between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the cis-Golgi compartment (1, 2). VTCs are pleomorphic structures that sort anterograde-directed cargo from recycling proteins and trafficking machinery retrieved to the ER (3-6). Rab2 bound to a VTC microdomain stimulates recruitment of soluble factors that results in the release of vesicles containing the recycling protein p53/p58 (7). In that regard, we have previously reported that glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and atypical PKC ι (aPKCι) are Rab2 effectors that interact directly with the Rab2 amino terminus and with each other (8, 9). Their interaction requires Src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of GAPDH and aPKCι (10). Moreover, GAPDH is a substrate for aPKCι (11). GAPDH catalytic activity is not required for ER to Golgi transport indicating that GAPDH provides a specific function essential for membrane trafficking from VTCs independent of glycolytic function (9). Indeed, phospho-GAPDH influences MT dynamics in the early secretory pathway (11).GAPDH was the first glycolytic enzyme reported to co-purify with microtubules (MTs) (12) and subsequently was shown to interact with the carboxyl terminus of α-tubulin (13). The binding of GAPDH to MTs promotes formation of cross-linked parallel MT arrays or bundles (14, 15). GAPDH has also been reported to possess membrane fusogenic activity, which is inhibited by tubulin (16). Similarly, aPKC associates directly with tubulin and promotes MT stability and MT remodeling at specific intracellular sites (17-21). It may not be coincidental that these two Rab2 effectors influence MT dynamics because recent studies indicate that the cytoskeleton plays a central role in the organization and operation of the secretory pathway (22).MTs are dynamic structures that grow or shrink by the addition or loss of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers from the ends of protofilaments (23). Their assembly and stability is regulated by a variety of proteins traditionally referred to as microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). In addition to the multiple α/β isoforms that are present in eukaryotes, MTs undergo an assortment of post-translational modifications, including acetylation, glycylation, glutamylation, phosphorylation, palmitoylation, and detyrosination, which further contribute to their biochemical heterogeneity (24, 25). It has been proposed that these tubulin modifications regulate intracellular events by facilitating interaction with MAPs and with other specific effector proteins (24). For example, the reversible addition of tyrosine to the carboxyl terminus of α-tubulin regulates MT interaction with plus-end tracking proteins (+TIPs) containing the cytoskeleton-associated protein glycine-rich (CAP-Gly) motif and with dynein-dynactin (27-29). Additionally, MT motility and cargo transport rely on the cooperation of the motor proteins kinesin and dynein (30). Kinesin is a plus-end directed MT motor, whereas cytoplasmic dynein is a minus-end MT-based motor, and therefore the motors transport vesicular cargo toward the opposite end of a MT track (31).Although MT assembly does not appear to be directly regulated by small GTPases, Rab proteins provide a molecular link for vesicle movement along MTs to the appropriate target (22, 32-34). In this study, the potential interaction of Rab2 with MTs and motor proteins was characterized. We found that Rab2 does not bind directly to preassembled MTs but does associate when both GAPDH and aPKCι are present and bound to MTs. Moreover, the MTs predominantly contained tyrosinated α-tubulin (Tyr-tubulin) suggesting that a dynamic pool of MTs that differentially binds MAPs/effector proteins/motors associates with VTCs in response to Rab2. To that end, we determined that Rab2-promoted dynein/dynactin binding to membranes and that the recruitment required aPKCι.     

Differential Roles of the Glycogen-Binding Domains of β Subunits in Regulation of the Snf1 Kinase Complex

Members of the AMP-activated protein kinase family, including the Snf1 kinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are activated under conditions of nutrient stress. AMP-activated protein kinases are heterotrimeric complexes composed of a catalytic α subunit and regulatory β and γ subunits. In this study, the role of the β subunits in the regulation of Snf1 activity was examined. Yeasts express three isoforms of the AMP-activated protein kinase consisting of Snf1 (α), Snf4 (γ), and one of three alternative β subunits, either Sip1, Sip2, or Gal83. The Gal83 isoform of the Snf1 complex is the most abundant and was analyzed in the greatest detail. All three β subunits contain a conserved domain referred to as the glycogen-binding domain. The deletion of this domain from Gal83 results in a deregulation of the Snf1 kinase, as judged by a constitutive activity independent of glucose availability. In contrast, the deletion of this homologous domain from the Sip1 and Sip2 subunits had little effect on Snf1 kinase regulation. Therefore, the different Snf1 kinase isoforms are regulated through distinct mechanisms, which may contribute to their specialized roles in different stress response pathways. In addition, the β subunits are subjected to phosphorylation. The responsible kinases were identified as being Snf1 and casein kinase II. The significance of the phosphorylation is unclear since the deletion of the region containing the phosphorylation sites in Gal83 had little effect on the regulation of Snf1 in response to glucose limitation.The Snf1 protein kinase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the yeast ortholog of the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) found in mammals and other eukaryotes. AMPK acts as a nutrient and energy sensor, becoming activated under conditions of nutrient and energy depletion (6). In mammals, AMPK plays a key role in glucose homeostasis and is a target for drugs used to treat metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes (34). In yeast, the Snf1 kinase plays an essential role during aerobic growth and fermentative growth on alternative carbon sources. Cells lacking Snf1 kinase activity are viable but display numerous phenotypes including poor or no growth on alternative carbon sources, defects in meiosis and sporulation, defects in response to ion stress, and defects in pseudohyphal growth (7).The Snf1 kinase and all members of the AMPK family function as heterotrimers composed of a catalytic α subunit complexed with regulatory β and γ subunits (2). The γ subunit in mammalian enzymes directly binds three molecules of AMP (26, 33), which stimulates enzyme activity by inhibiting the dephosphorylation of the conserved threonine residue in the kinase activation loop (23). In yeast, there is no evidence that the γ subunit binds AMP; however, similar to mammals, the key glucose-regulated step is the dephosphorylation of the kinase activation loop (22).In this study, we examine the role of the β subunits in the regulation of the Snf1 kinase activity. Yeasts express three isoforms of the Snf1 kinase that differ depending on which of the three distinct β subunits, Sip1, Sip2, and Gal83, is incorporated into the enzyme. Previous studies have shown that the Snf1 isoforms have distinct substrate preferences (24), subcellular localizations (32), and stress response capacities (9). Only the Snf1 isoform containing Gal83 as the β subunit is able to localize to the cell nucleus in a process that requires Sak1, one of the three Snf1-activating protein kinases. Since all three of the Snf1-activating kinases (SAKs) are capable of phosphorylating Snf1 on its activation loop (3), it has remained a mystery as to why the Sak1 kinase is specifically required for Snf1 nuclear localization.The β subunits of Snf1 as well as mammalian AMPK contain a domain that is referred to as either a carbohydrate-binding module (CBM) (11) or a glycogen-binding domain (GBD) (19). The structure of this domain has been solved (20), and it was previously shown that this domain binds most tightly to branched oligosaccharides like glycogen that contain α1→6 branches (12). The binding of glycogen to the β subunit causes an allosteric inhibition of AMPK activity and inhibits phosphorylation by the upstream activating kinase. The β subunits of yeast contain the GBDs, but the importance of binding glycogen is questionable since cells that lack the ability to make glycogen show a normal regulation of Snf1 kinase in response to glucose limitation (15). Nonetheless, the deletion of the GBD from the Gal83 protein caused an increased activity of the Snf1 enzyme and release from glucose repression. Therefore, the GBD acts as a negative regulator of kinase activity in both mammalian and fungal cells.In this study we examine the role of the GBD present in the Sip2 and Sip1 proteins. We also extend the characterization of the Gal83 GBD by determining what connection this domain has with the regulated dephosphorylation of the Snf1 kinase. Finally, we have characterized other N-terminal domains in the β subunits that control accumulation and phosphorylation.     

Mechanism of Activation and Functional Role of Protein Kinase C�� in Human Platelets

The novel class of protein kinase C (nPKC) isoform η is expressed in platelets, but not much is known about its activation and function. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of activation and functional implications of nPKCη using pharmacological and gene knock-out approaches. nPKCη was phosphorylated (at Thr-512) in a time- and concentration-dependent manner by 2MeSADP. Pretreatment of platelets with MRS-2179, a P2Y₁ receptor antagonist, or YM-254890, a G_q blocker, abolished 2MeSADP-induced phosphorylation of nPKCη. Similarly, ADP failed to activate nPKCη in platelets isolated from P2Y₁ and G_q knock-out mice. However, pretreatment of platelets with P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, AR-C69331MX did not interfere with ADP-induced nPKCη phosphorylation. In addition, when platelets were activated with 2MeSADP under stirring conditions, although nPKCη was phosphorylated within 30 s by ADP receptors, it was also dephosphorylated by activated integrin α_IIbβ₃ mediated outside-in signaling. Moreover, in the presence of SC-57101, a α_IIbβ₃ receptor antagonist, nPKCη dephosphorylation was inhibited. Furthermore, in murine platelets lacking PP1cγ, a catalytic subunit of serine/threonine phosphatase, α_IIbβ₃ failed to dephosphorylate nPKCη. Thus, we conclude that ADP activates nPKCη via P2Y₁ receptor and is subsequently dephosphorylated by PP1γ phosphatase activated by α_IIbβ₃ integrin. In addition, pretreatment of platelets with η-RACK antagonistic peptides, a specific inhibitor of nPKCη, inhibited ADP-induced thromboxane generation. However, these peptides had no affect on ADP-induced aggregation when thromboxane generation was blocked. In summary, nPKCη positively regulates agonist-induced thromboxane generation with no effects on platelet aggregation.Platelets are the key cellular components in maintaining hemostasis (1). Vascular injury exposes subendothelial collagen that activates platelets to change shape, secrete contents of granules, generate thromboxane, and finally aggregate via activated α_IIbβ₃ integrin, to prevent further bleeding (2, 3). ADP is a physiological agonist of platelets secreted from dense granules and is involved in feedback activation of platelets and hemostatic plug stabilization (4). It activates two distinct G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) on platelets, P2Y₁ and P2Y₁₂, which couple to G_q and G_i, respectively (5–8). G_q activates phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ), which leads to diacyl glycerol (DAG)² generation and calcium mobilization (9, 10). On the other hand, G_i is involved in inhibition of cAMP levels and PI 3-kinase activation (4, 6). Synergistic activation of G_q and G_i proteins leads to the activation of the fibrinogen receptor integrin α_IIbβ₃. Fibrinogen bound to activated integrin α_IIbβ₃ further initiates feed back signaling (outside-in signaling) in platelets that contributes to the formation of a stable platelet plug (11).Protein kinase Cs (PKCs) are serine/threonine kinases known to regulate various platelet functional responses such as dense granule secretion and integrin α_IIbβ₃ activation (12, 13). Based on their structure and cofactor requirements, PKCs are divided in to three classes: classical (cofactors: DAG, Ca²⁺), novel (cofactors: DAG) and atypical (cofactors: PIP₃) PKC isoforms (14). All the members of the novel class of PKC isoforms (nPKC), viz. nPKC isoforms δ, θ, η, and ε, are expressed in platelets (15), and they require DAG for activation. Among all the nPKCs, PKCδ (15, 16) and PKCθ (17–19) are fairly studied in platelets. Whereas nPKCδ is reported to regulate protease-activated receptor (PAR)-mediated dense granule secretion (15, 20), nPKCθ is activated by outside-in signaling and contributes to platelet spreading on fibrinogen (18). On the other hand, the mechanism of activation and functional role of nPKCη is not addressed as yet.PKCs are cytoplasmic enzymes. The enzyme activity of PKCs is modulated via three mechanisms (14, 21): 1) cofactor binding: upon cell stimulus, cytoplasmic PKCs mobilize to membrane, bind cofactors such as DAG, Ca²⁺, or PIP3, release autoinhibition, and attain an active conformation exposing catalytic domain of the enzyme. 2) phosphorylations: 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) on the membrane phosphorylates conserved threonine residues on activation loop of catalytic domain; this is followed by autophosphorylations of serine/threonine residues on turn motif and hydrophobic region. These series of phosphorylations maintain an active conformation of the enzyme. 3) RACK binding: PKCs in active conformation bind receptors for activated C kinases (RACKs) and are lead to various subcellular locations to access the substrates (22, 23). Although various leading laboratories have elucidated the activation of PKCs, the mechanism of down-regulation of PKCs is not completely understood.The premise of dynamic cell signaling, which involves protein phosphorylations by kinases and dephosphorylations by phosphatases has gained immense attention over recent years. PP1, PP2A, PP2B, PHLPP are a few of the serine/threonine phosphatases reported to date. Among them PP1 and PP2 phosphatases are known to regulate various platelet functional responses (24, 25). Furthermore, PP1c, is the catalytic unit of PP1 known to constitutively associate with α_IIb and is activated upon integrin engagement with fibrinogen and subsequent outside-in signaling (26). Among various PP1 isoforms, recently PP1γ is shown to positively regulate platelet functional responses (27). Thus, in this study we investigated if the above-mentioned phosphatases are involved in down-regulation of nPKCη. Furthermore, reports from other cell systems suggest that nPKCη regulates ERK/JNK pathways (28). In platelets ERK is known to regulate agonist induced thromboxane generation (29, 30). Thus, we also investigated if nPKCη regulates ERK phosphorylation and thereby agonist-induced platelet functional responses.In this study, we evaluated the activation of nPKCη downstream of ADP receptors and its inactivation by an integrin-associated phosphatase PP1γ. We also studied if nPKCη regulates functional responses in platelets and found that this isoform regulates ADP-induced thromboxane generation, but not fibrinogen receptor activation in platelets.     

Biochemical Characterization of the Prolyl 3-Hydroxylase 1��Cartilage-associated Protein��Cyclophilin B Complex

The rough endoplasmic reticulum-resident protein complex consisting of prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1 (P3H1), cartilage-associated protein (CRTAP), and cyclophilin B (CypB) can be isolated from chick embryos on a gelatin-Sepharose column, indicating some involvement in the biosynthesis of procollagens. Prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1 modifies a single proline residue in the α chains of type I, II, and III collagens to (3S)-hydroxyproline. The peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity of cyclophilin B was shown previously to catalyze the rate of triple helix formation. Here we show that cyclophilin B in the complex shows peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity and that the P3H1·CRTAP·CypB complex has another important function: it acts as a chaperone molecule when tested with two classical chaperone assays. The P3H1·CRTAP·CypB complex inhibited the thermal aggregation of citrate synthase and was active in the denatured rhodanese refolding and aggregation assay. The chaperone activity of the complex was higher than that of protein-disulfide isomerase, a well characterized chaperone. The P3H1·CRTAP·CypB complex also delayed the in vitro fibril formation of type I collagen, indicating that this complex is also able to interact with triple helical collagen and acts as a collagen chaperone.     

Phosphorylation of the Consensus Sites of Protein Kinase A on ��1D L-type Calcium Channel

The novel α_1D L-type Ca²⁺ channel is expressed in supraventricular tissue and has been implicated in the pacemaker activity of the heart and in atrial fibrillation. We recently demonstrated that PKA activation led to increased α_1D Ca²⁺ channel activity in tsA201 cells by phosphorylation of the channel protein. Here we sought to identify the phosphorylated PKA consensus sites on the α₁ subunit of the α_1D Ca²⁺ channel by generating GST fusion proteins of the intracellular loops, N terminus, proximal and distal C termini of the α₁ subunit of α_1D Ca²⁺ channel. An in vitro PKA kinase assay was performed for the GST fusion proteins, and their phosphorylation was assessed by Western blotting using either anti-PKA substrate or anti-phosphoserine antibodies. Western blotting showed that the N terminus and C terminus were phosphorylated. Serines 1743 and 1816, two PKA consensus sites, were phosphorylated by PKA and identified by mass spectrometry. Site directed mutagenesis and patch clamp studies revealed that serines 1743 and 1816 were major functional PKA consensus sites. Altogether, biochemical and functional data revealed that serines 1743 and 1816 are major functional PKA consensus sites on the α₁ subunit of α_1D Ca²⁺ channel. These novel findings provide new insights into the autonomic regulation of the α_1D Ca²⁺ channel in the heart.L-type Ca²⁺ channels are essential for the generation of normal cardiac rhythm, for induction of rhythm propagation through the atrioventricular node and for the contraction of the atrial and ventricular muscles (1–5). L-type Ca²⁺ channel is a multisubunit complex including α₁, β and α₂/δ subunits (5–7). The α₁ subunit contains the voltage sensor, the selectivity filter, the ion conduction pore, and the binding sites for all known Ca²⁺ channel blockers (6–9). While α_1C Ca²⁺ channel is expressed in the atria and ventricles of the heart (10–13), expression of α_1D Ca²⁺ channel is restricted to the sinoatrial (SA)² and atrioventricular (AV) nodes, as well as in the atria, but not in the adult ventricles (2, 3, 10).Only recently it has been realized that α_1D along with α_1C Ca²⁺ channels contribute to L-type Ca²⁺ current (I_Ca-L) and they both play important but unique roles in the physiology/pathophysiology of the heart (6–9). Compared with α_1C, α_1D L-type Ca²⁺ channel activates at a more negative voltage range and shows slower current inactivation during depolarization (14, 15). These properties may allow α_1D Ca²⁺ channel to play critical roles in SA and AV nodes function. Indeed, α_1D Ca²⁺ channel knock-out mice exhibit significant SA dysfunction and various degrees of AV block (12, 16–19).The modulation of α_1C Ca²⁺ channel by cAMP-dependent PKA phosphorylation has been extensively studied, and the C terminus of α₁ was identified as the site of the modulation (20–22). Our group was the first to report that 8-bromo-cAMP (8-Br-cAMP), a membrane-permeable cAMP analog, increased α_1D Ca²⁺ channel activity using patch clamp studies (2). However, very little is known about potential PKA phosphorylation consensus motifs on the α_1D Ca²⁺ channel. We therefore hypothesized that the C terminus of the α₁ subunit of the α_1D Ca²⁺ channel mediates its modulation by cAMP-dependent PKA pathway.     

Intracellular Trafficking of Presenilin 1 Is Regulated by ��-Amyloid Precursor Protein and Phospholipase D1

Excessive accumulation of β-amyloid peptides in the brain is a major cause for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease. β-Amyloid is derived from β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) through sequential cleavages by β- and γ-secretases, whose enzymatic activities are tightly controlled by subcellular localization. Delineation of how intracellular trafficking of these secretases and APP is regulated is important for understanding Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Although APP trafficking is regulated by multiple factors including presenilin 1 (PS1), a major component of the γ-secretase complex, and phospholipase D1 (PLD1), a phospholipid-modifying enzyme, regulation of intracellular trafficking of PS1/γ-secretase and β-secretase is less clear. Here we demonstrate that APP can reciprocally regulate PS1 trafficking; APP deficiency results in faster transport of PS1 from the trans-Golgi network to the cell surface and increased steady state levels of PS1 at the cell surface, which can be reversed by restoring APP levels. Restoration of APP in APP-deficient cells also reduces steady state levels of other γ-secretase components (nicastrin, APH-1, and PEN-2) and the cleavage of Notch by PS1/γ-secretase that is more highly correlated with cell surface levels of PS1 than with APP overexpression levels, supporting the notion that Notch is mainly cleaved at the cell surface. In contrast, intracellular trafficking of β-secretase (BACE1) is not regulated by APP. Moreover, we find that PLD1 also regulates PS1 trafficking and that PLD1 overexpression promotes cell surface accumulation of PS1 in an APP-independent manner. Our results clearly elucidate a physiological function of APP in regulating protein trafficking and suggest that intracellular trafficking of PS1/γ-secretase is regulated by multiple factors, including APP and PLD1.An important pathological hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD)⁴ is the formation of senile plaques in the brains of patients. The major components of those plaques are β-amyloid peptides (Aβ), whose accumulation triggers a cascade of neurodegenerative steps ending in formation of senile plaques and intraneuronal fibrillary tangles with subsequent neuronal loss in susceptible brain regions (1, 2). Aβ is proteolytically derived from the β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) through sequential cleavages by β-secretase (BACE1), a novel membrane-bound aspartyl protease (3, 4), and by γ-secretase, a high molecular weight complex consisting of at least four components: presenilin (PS), nicastrin (NCT), anterior pharynx-defective-1 (APH-1), and presenilin enhancer-2 (PEN-2) (5, 6). APP is a type I transmembrane protein belonging to a protein family that includes APP-like protein 1 (APLP1) and 2 (APLP2) in mammals (7, 8). Full-length APP is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and transported through the Golgi apparatus. Most secreted Aβ peptides are generated within the trans-Golgi network (TGN), also the major site of steady state APP in neurons (9–11). APP can be transported to the cell surface in TGN-derived secretory vesicles if not proteolyzed to Aβ or an intermediate metabolite. At the cell surface APP is either cleaved by α-secretase to produce soluble sAPPα (12) or reinternalized for endosomal/lysosomal degradation (13, 14). Aβ may also be generated in endosomal/lysosomal compartments (15, 16). In contrast to neurotoxic Aβ peptides, sAPPα possesses neuroprotective potential (17, 18). Thus, the subcellular distribution of APP and proteases that process it directly affect the ratio of sAPPα to Aβ, making delineation of the mechanisms responsible for regulating trafficking of all of these proteins relevant to AD pathogenesis.Presenilin (PS) is a critical component of the γ-secretase. Of the two mammalian PS gene homologues, PS1 and PS2, PS1 encodes the major form (PS1) in active γ-secretase (19, 20). Nascent PSs undergo endoproteolytic cleavage to generate an amino-terminal fragment (NTF) and a carboxyl-terminal fragment (CTF) to form a functional PS heterodimer (21). Based on observations that PSs possess two highly conserved aspartate residues indispensable for γ-secretase activity and that specific transition state analogue γ-secretase inhibitors bind to PS1 NTF/CTF heterodimers (5, 22), PSs are believed to be the catalytic component of the γ-secretase complex. PS assembles with three other components, NCT, APH-1, and PEN-2, to form the functional γ-secretase (5, 6). Strong evidence suggests that PS1/γ-secretase resides principally in the ER, early Golgi, TGN, endocytic and intermediate compartments, most of which (except the TGN) are not major subcellular sites for APP (23, 24). In addition to generating Aβ and cleaving APP to release the APP intracellular domain, PS1/γ-secretase cleaves other substrates such as Notch (25), cadherin (26), ErbB4 (27), and CD44 (28), releasing their respective intracellular domains. Interestingly, PS1/γ-secretase cleavage of different substrates seems to occur at different subcellular compartments; APP is mainly cleaved at the TGN and early endosome domains, whereas Notch is predominantly cleaved at the cell surface (9, 11, 29). Thus, perturbing intracellular trafficking of PS1/γ-secretase may alter interactions between PS1/γ-secretase and APP, contributing to either abnormal Aβ generation and AD pathogenesis or decreased access of PS1/γ-secretase to APP such that Aβ production is reduced. However, mechanisms regulating PS1/γ-secretase trafficking warrant further investigation.In addition to participating in γ-secretase activity, PS1 regulates intracellular trafficking of several membrane proteins, including other γ-secretase components (nicastrin, APH-1, and PEN-2) and the substrate APP (reviewed in Ref. 30). Intracellular APP trafficking is highly regulated and requires other factors such as mint family members and SorLA (2). Moreover, we recently found that phospholipase D1 (PLD1), a phospholipid-modifying enzyme that regulates membrane trafficking events, can interact with PS1, and can regulate budding of APP-containing vesicles from the TGN and delivery of APP to the cell surface (31, 32). Interestingly, Kamal et al. (33) identified an axonal membrane compartment that contains APP, BACE1, and PS1 and showed that fast anterograde axonal transport of this compartment is mediated by APP and kinesin-I, implying a traffic-regulating role for APP. Increased APP expression is also shown to decrease retrograde axonal transport of nerve growth factor (34). However, whether APP indeed regulates intracellular trafficking of proteins including BACE1 and PS1/γ-secretase requires further validation. In the present study we demonstrate that intracellular trafficking of PS1, as well as that of other γ-secretase components, but not BACE1, is regulated by APP. APP deficiency promotes cell surface delivery of PS1/γ-secretase complex and facilitates PS1/γ-secretase-mediated Notch cleavage. In addition, we find that PLD1 also regulates intracellular trafficking of PS1 through a different mechanism and more potently than APP.     

Characterization of Group A Streptococcal M23 Protein and Comparison of the M3 and M23 Protein’s Ligand-Binding Domains

The present study concerns the properties for binding of human plasma and extracellular matrix proteins and the relationship between M3 and M23 molecules. Here, it is demonstrated that M23 protein shows a multiple binding to fibrinogen (FG), fibronectin (FN), human serum albumin (HSA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), kininogen, and collagen type I (CI) in Western blot analysis. Some sets of truncated-recombinant M3 or M23 protein fragments were assayed for their capacity to bind FN, FG, IgG, HSA, and CI. The HSA binding activity resided in the C-repeat region of M3 protein, whereas fibrinogen-binding activity resided in the A-repeat region. The FG, FN, and IgG binding sites were mapped to the N-terminal portion of M23 protein, whereas HSA binding was localized in the B-repeat domain, which has homology with C-repeat domain in M3 molecule. Therefore, it is concluded that the FN, FG, and IgG binding regions in the M3 and M23 proteins are quite dissimilar at the amino acid sequence level, whereas HSA binding is localized to the conserved C-repeat domain in the M3 and M23 proteins.     

The Cytoskeletal Protein ��-Actinin Regulates Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a through a C-terminal Interaction

The acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a) is widely expressed in central and peripheral neurons where it generates transient cation currents when extracellular pH falls. ASIC1a confers pH-dependent modulation on postsynaptic dendritic spines and has critical effects in neurological diseases associated with a reduced pH. However, knowledge of the proteins that interact with ASIC1a and influence its function is limited. Here, we show that α-actinin, which links membrane proteins to the actin cytoskeleton, associates with ASIC1a in brain and in cultured cells. The interaction depended on an α-actinin-binding site in the ASIC1a C terminus that was specific for ASIC1a versus other ASICs and for α-actinin-1 and -4. Co-expressing α-actinin-4 altered ASIC1a current density, pH sensitivity, desensitization rate, and recovery from desensitization. Moreover, reducing α-actinin expression altered acid-activated currents in hippocampal neurons. These findings suggest that α-actinins may link ASIC1a to a macromolecular complex in the postsynaptic membrane where it regulates ASIC1a activity.Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs)² are H⁺-gated members of the DEG/ENaC family (1–3). Members of this family contain cytosolic N and C termini, two transmembrane domains, and a large cysteine-rich extracellular domain. ASIC subunits combine as homo- or heterotrimers to form cation channels that are widely expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems (1–4). In mammals, four genes encode ASICs, and two subunits, ASIC1 and ASIC2, have two splice forms, a and b. Central nervous system neurons express ASIC1a, ASIC2a, and ASIC2b (5–7). Homomeric ASIC1a channels are activated when extracellular pH drops below 7.2, and half-maximal activation occurs at pH 6.5–6.8 (8–10). These channels desensitize in the continued presence of a low extracellular pH, and they can conduct Ca²⁺ (9, 11–13). ASIC1a is required for acid-evoked currents in central nervous system neurons; disrupting the gene encoding ASIC1a eliminates H⁺-gated currents unless extracellular pH is reduced below pH 5.0 (5, 7).Previous studies found ASIC1a enriched in synaptosomal membrane fractions and present in dendritic spines, the site of excitatory synapses (5, 14, 15). Consistent with this localization, ASIC1a null mice manifested deficits in hippocampal long term potentiation, learning, and memory, which suggested that ASIC1a is required for normal synaptic plasticity (5, 16). ASICs might be activated during neurotransmission when synaptic vesicles empty their acidic contents into the synaptic cleft or when neuronal activity lowers extracellular pH (17–19). Ion channels, including those at the synapse often interact with multiple proteins in a macromolecular complex that incorporates regulators of their function (20, 21). For ASIC1a, only a few interacting proteins have been identified. Earlier work indicated that ASIC1a interacts with another postsynaptic scaffolding protein, PICK1 (15, 22, 23). ASIC1a also has been reported to interact with annexin II light chain p11 through its cytosolic N terminus to increase cell surface expression (24) and with Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to phosphorylate the channel (25). However, whether ASIC1a interacts with additional proteins and with the cytoskeleton remain unknown. Moreover, it is not known whether such interactions alter ASIC1a function.In analyzing the ASIC1a amino acid sequence, we identified cytosolic residues that might bind α-actinins. α-Actinins cluster membrane proteins and signaling molecules into macromolecular complexes and link membrane proteins to the actincytoskeleton (for review, Ref. 26). Four genes encode α-actinin-1, -2, -3, and -4 isoforms. α-Actinins contain an N-terminal head domain that binds F-actin, a C-terminal region containing two EF-hand motifs, and a central rod domain containing four spectrin-like motifs (26–28). The C-terminal portion of the rod segment appears to be crucial for binding to membrane proteins. The α-actinins assemble into antiparallel homodimers through interactions in their rod domain. α-Actinins-1, -2, and -4 are enriched in dendritic spines, concentrating at the postsynaptic membrane (29–35). In the postsynaptic membrane of excitatory synapses, α-actinin connects the NMDA receptor to the actin cytoskeleton, and this interaction is key for Ca²⁺-dependent inhibition of NMDA receptors (36–38). α-Actinins can also regulate the membrane trafficking and function of several cation channels, including L-type Ca²⁺ channels, K⁺ channels, and TRP channels (39–41).To better understand the function of ASIC1a channels in macromolecular complexes, we asked if ASIC1a associates with α-actinins. We were interested in the α-actinins because they and ASIC1a, both, are present in dendritic spines, ASIC1a contains a potential α-actinin binding sequence, and the related epithelial Na⁺ channel (ENaC) interacts with the cytoskeleton (42, 43). Therefore, we hypothesized that α-actinin interacts structurally and functionally with ASIC1a.     

CP12 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a Permanent Specific ��Chaperone-like�� Protein of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase

A new role is reported for CP12, a highly unfolded and flexible protein, mainly known for its redox function with A₄ glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Both reduced and oxidized CP12 can prevent the in vitro thermal inactivation and aggregation of GAPDH from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. This mechanism is thus not redox-dependent. The protection is specific to CP12, because other proteins, such as bovine serum albumin, thioredoxin, and a general chaperone, Hsp33, do not fully prevent denaturation of GAPDH. Furthermore, CP12 acts as a specific chaperone, since it does not protect other proteins, such as catalase, alcohol dehydrogenase, or lysozyme. The interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is necessary to prevent the aggregation and inactivation, since the mutant C66S that does not form any complex with GAPDH cannot accomplish this protection. Unlike the C66S mutant, the C23S mutant that lacks the N-terminal bridge is partially able to protect and to slow down the inactivation and aggregation. Tryptic digestion coupled to mass spectrometry confirmed that the S-loop of GAPDH is the interaction site with CP12. Thus, CP12 not only has a redox function but also behaves as a specific “chaperone-like protein” for GAPDH, although a stable and not transitory interaction is observed. This new function of CP12 may explain why it is also present in complexes involving A₂B₂ GAPDHs that possess a regulatory C-terminal extension (GapB subunit) and therefore do not require CP12 to be redox-regulated.CP12 is a small 8.2-kDa protein present in the chloroplasts of most photosynthetic organisms, including cyanobacteria (1, 2), higher plants (3), the diatom Asterionella formosa (4, 5), and green (1) and red algae (6). It allows the formation of a supramolecular complex between phosphoribulokinase (EC 2.7.1.19) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH),³ two key enzymes of the Calvin cycle pathway, and was recently shown to interact with fructose bisphosphate aldolase, another enzyme of the Calvin cycle pathway (7). The phosphoribulokinase·GAPDH·CP12 complex has been extensively studied in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (8, 9) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (10, 11). In the green alga C. reinhardtii, the interaction between CP12 and GAPDH is strong (8). GAPDH may exist as a homotetramer composed of four GapA subunits (A₄) in higher plants, cyanobacteria, and green and red algae (6, 12), but in higher plants, it can also exist as a heterotetramer (A₂B₂), composed of two subunits, GapA and GapB (13, 14). GapB, up to now, has exclusively been found in Streptophyta, but recently two prasinophycean green algae, Ostreococcus tauri and Ostreococcus lucimarinus, were also shown to possess a GapB gene, whereas CP12 is missing (15). The GapB subunit is similar to the GapA subunit but has a C-terminal extension containing two redox-regulated cysteine residues (16). Thus, although the A₄ GAPDHs lack these regulatory cysteine residues (13, 14, 17–20), they are also redox-regulated through its interaction with CP12, since the C terminus of this small protein resembles the C-terminal extension of the GapB subunit. The regulatory cysteine residues for GapA are thus supplied by CP12, as is well documented in the literature (1, 8, 11, 16).CP12 belongs to the family of intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) (21–26). The amino acid composition of these proteins causes them to have no or few secondary structures. Their total or partial lack of structure and their high flexibility allow them to be molecular adaptors (27, 28). They are often able to bind to several partners and are involved in most cellular functions (29, 30). Recently, some IUPs have been described in photosynthetic organisms (31, 32).There are many functional categories of IUPs (22, 33). They can be, for instance, involved in permanent binding and have (i) a scavenger role, neutralizing or storing small ligands; (ii) an assembler role by forming complexes; and (iii) an effector role by modulating the activity of a partner molecule (33). These functions are not exclusive; thus, CP12 can form a stable complex with GAPDH, regulating its redox properties (8, 34, 35), and can also bind a metal ion (36, 37). IUPs can also bind transiently to partners, and some of them have been found to possess a chaperone activity (31, 38). This chaperone function was first shown for α-synuclein (39) and for α-casein (40), which are fully disordered. The amino acid composition of IUPs is less hydrophobic than those of soluble proteins; hence, they lack hydrophobic cores and do not become insoluble when heated. Since CP12 belongs to this family, we tested if it was resistant to heat treatment and finally, since it is tightly bound to GAPDH, if it could prevent aggregation of its partner, GAPDH, an enzyme well known for its tendency to aggregate (41–44) and consequently a substrate commonly used in chaperone studies (45, 46).Unlike chaperones, which form transient, dynamic complexes with their protein substrates through hydrophobic interactions (47, 48), CP12 forms a stable complex with GAPDH. The interaction involves the C-terminal part of the protein and the presence of negatively charged residues on CP12 (35). However, only a site-directed mutagenesis has been performed to characterize the interaction site on GAPDH. Although the mutation could have an indirect effect, the residue Arg-197 was shown to be a good candidate for the interaction site (49).In this report, we accordingly used proteolysis experiments coupled with mass spectrometry to detect which regions of GAPDH are protected by its association with CP12. To conclude, the aim of this report was to characterize a chaperone function of CP12 that had never been described before and to map the interaction site on GAPDH using an approach that does not involve site-directed mutagenesis.     

Control of TANK-binding Kinase 1-mediated Signaling by the ��134.5 Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus 1

TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) is a key component of Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent signaling pathways. In response to microbial components, TBK1 activates interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and cytokine expression. Here we show that TBK1 is a novel target of the γ₁34.5 protein, a virulence factor whose expression is regulated in a temporal fashion. Remarkably, the γ₁34.5 protein is required to inhibit IRF3 phosphorylation, nuclear translocation, and the induction of antiviral genes in infected cells. When expressed in mammalian cells, the γ₁34.5 protein forms complexes with TBK1 and disrupts the interaction of TBK1 and IRF3, which prevents the induction of interferon and interferon-stimulated gene promoters. Down-regulation of TBK1 requires the amino-terminal domain. In addition, unlike wild type virus, a herpes simplex virus mutant lacking γ₁34.5 replicates efficiently in TBK1^-/- cells but not in TBK1^+/+ cells. Addition of exogenous interferon restores the antiviral activity in both TBK1^-/- and TBK^+/+ cells. Hence, control of TBK1-mediated cell signaling by the γ₁34.5 protein contributes to herpes simplex virus infection. These results reveal that TBK1 plays a pivotal role in limiting replication of a DNA virus.Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)³ is a large DNA virus that establishes latent or lytic infection, in which the virus triggers innate immune responses. In HSV-infected cells, a number of antiviral mechanisms operate in a cell type- and time-dependent manner (1). In response to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) recruits an adaptor TIR domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β and stimulates cytokine expression (2, 3). In the cytoplasm, RNA helicases, RIG-I (retinoid acid-inducible gene-I), and MDA5 (melanoma differentiation associated gene 5) recognize intracellular viral 5′-triphosphate RNA or dsRNA (2, 4). Furthermore, a DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factor (DAI) senses double-stranded DNA in the cytoplasm and induces cytokine expression (5). There is also evidence that viral entry induces antiviral programs independent of TLR and RIG-I pathways (6). While recognizing distinct viral components, these innate immune pathways relay signals to the two IKK-related kinases, TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and inducible IκB kinase (IKKi) (2).The IKK-related kinases function as essential components that phosphorylate IRF3 (interferon regulatory factor 3), as well as the closely related IRF7, which translocates to the nucleus and induces antiviral genes, such as interferon-α/β and ISG56 (interferon-stimulated gene 56) (7, 8). TBK1 is constitutively expressed, whereas IKKi is engaged as an inducible gene product of innate immune signaling (9, 10). IRF3 activation is attenuated in TBK1-deficient but not in IKKi-deficient cells (11, 12). Its activation is completely abolished in double-deficient cells (12), suggesting a partially redundant function of TBK1 and IKKi. Indeed, IKKi also negatively regulates the STAT-signaling pathway (13). TBK1/IKKi interacts with several proteins, such as TRAF family member-associated NF-κB activator (TANK), NAP1 (NAK-associated protein 1), similar to NAP1TBK1 adaptor (SINTBAD), DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors (DAI), and secretory protein 5 (Sec5) in host cells (5, 14–18). These interactions are thought to regulate TBK1/IKKi, which delineates innate as well as adaptive immune responses.Upon viral infection, expression of HSV proteins interferes with the induction of antiviral immunity. When treated with UV or cycloheximide, HSV induces an array of antiviral genes in human lung fibroblasts (19, 20). Furthermore, an HSV mutant, with deletion in immediate early protein ICP0, induces ISG56 expression (21). Accordingly, expression of ICP0 inhibits the induction of antiviral programs mediated by IRF3 or IRF7 (21–23). However, although ICP0 negatively regulates IFN-β expression, it is not essential for this effect (24). In HSV-infected human macrophages or dendritic cells, an immediate early protein ICP27 is required to suppress cytokine induction involving IRF3 (25). In this context, it is notable that an HSV mutant, lacking a leaky late gene γ₁34.5, replicates efficiently in cells devoid of IFN-α/β genes (26). Additionally, the γ₁34.5 null mutant induces differential cytokine expression as compared with wild type virus (27). Thus, HSV modulation of cytokine expression is a complex process that involves multiple viral components. Currently, the molecular mechanism governing this event is unclear. In this study, we show that HSV γ₁34.5 targets TBK1 and inhibits antiviral signaling. The data herein reveal a previously unrecognized mechanism by which γ₁34.5 facilitates HSV replication.     

Generation and Characterization of ATP Analog-specific Protein Kinase Cδ

To better study the role of PKCδ in normal function and disease, we developed an ATP analog-specific (AS) PKCδ that is sensitive to specific kinase inhibitors and can be used to identify PKCδ substrates. AS PKCδ showed nearly 200 times higher affinity (K_m) and 150 times higher efficiency (k_cat/K_m) than wild type (WT) PKCδ toward N⁶-(benzyl)-ATP. AS PKCδ was uniquely inhibited by 1-(tert-butyl)-3-(1-naphthyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-amine (1NA-PP1) and 1-(tert-butyl)-3-(2-methylbenzyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-amine (2MB-PP1) but not by other 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP1) analogs tested, whereas WT PKCδ was insensitive to all PP1 analogs. To understand the mechanisms for specificity and affinity of these analogs, we created in silico WT and AS PKCδ homology models based on the crystal structure of PKCι. N⁶-(Benzyl)-ATP and ATP showed similar positioning within the purine binding pocket of AS PKCδ, whereas N⁶-(benzyl)-ATP was displaced from the pocket of WT PKCδ and was unable to interact with the glycine-rich loop that is required for phosphoryl transfer. The adenine rings of 1NA-PP1 and 2MB-PP1 matched the adenine ring of ATP when docked in AS PKCδ, and this interaction prevented the potential interaction of ATP with Lys-378, Glu-428, Leu-430, and Phe-633 residues. 1NA-PP1 failed to effectively dock within WT PKCδ. Other PP1 analogs failed to interact with either AS PKCδ or WT PKCδ. These results provide a structural basis for the ability of AS PKCδ to efficiently and specifically utilize N⁶-(benzyl)-ATP as a phosphate donor and for its selective inhibition by 1NA-PP1 and 2MB-PP1. Such homology modeling could prove useful in designing molecules to target PKCδ and other kinases to understand their function in cell signaling and to identify unique substrates.     

Molecular Basis of the Recognition of Nephronectin by Integrin ��8��1

Integrin α8β1 interacts with a variety of Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)-containing ligands in the extracellular matrix. Here, we examined the binding activities of α8β1 integrin toward a panel of RGD-containing ligands. Integrin α8β1 bound specifically to nephronectin with an apparent dissociation constant of 0.28 ± 0.01 nm, but showed only marginal affinities for fibronectin and other RGD-containing ligands. The high-affinity binding to α8β1 integrin was fully reproduced with a recombinant nephronectin fragment derived from the RGD-containing central “linker” segment. A series of deletion mutants of the recombinant fragment identified the LFEIFEIER sequence on the C-terminal side of the RGD motif as an auxiliary site required for high-affinity binding to α8β1 integrin. Alanine scanning mutagenesis within the LFEIFEIER sequence defined the EIE sequence as a critical motif ensuring the high-affinity integrin-ligand interaction. Although a synthetic LFEIFEIER peptide failed to inhibit the binding of α8β1 integrin to nephronectin, a longer peptide containing both the RGD motif and the LFEIFEIER sequence was strongly inhibitory, and was ∼2,000-fold more potent than a peptide containing only the RGD motif. Furthermore, trans-complementation assays using recombinant fragments containing either the RGD motif or LFEIFEIER sequence revealed a clear synergism in the binding to α8β1 integrin. Taken together, these results indicate that the specific high-affinity binding of nephronectin to α8β1 integrin is achieved by bipartite interaction of the integrin with the RGD motif and LFEIFEIER sequence, with the latter serving as a synergy site that greatly potentiates the RGD-driven integrin-ligand interaction but has only marginal activity to secure the interaction by itself.Integrins are a family of adhesion receptors that interact with a variety of extracellular ligands, typically cell-adhesive proteins in the extracellular matrix (ECM).² They play mandatory roles in embryonic development and the maintenance of tissue architectures by providing essential links between cells and the ECM (1). Integrins are composed of two non-covalently associated subunits, termed α and β. In mammals, 18 α and 8 β subunits have been identified, and combinations of these subunits give rise to at least 24 distinct integrin heterodimers. Based on their ligand-binding specificities, ECM-binding integrins are classified into three groups, namely laminin-, collagen- and RGD-binding integrins (2, 3), of which the RGD-binding integrins have been most extensively investigated. The RGD-binding integrins include α5β1, α8β1, αIIbβ3, and αV-containing integrins, and have been shown to interact with a variety of ECM ligands, such as fibronectin and vitronectin, with distinct binding specificities.The α8 integrin subunit was originally identified in chick nerves (4). Integrin α8β1 is expressed in the metanephric mesenchyme and plays a crucial role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during the early stages of kidney morphogenesis. Disruption of the α8 gene in mice was found to be associated with severe defects in kidney morphogenesis (5) and stereocilia development (6). To date, α8β1 integrin has been shown to bind to fibronectin, vitronectin, osteopontin, latency-associated peptide of transforming growth factor-β1, tenascin-W, and nephronectin (also named POEM) (7–13), among which nephronectin is believed to be an α8β1 integrin ligand involved in kidney development (10).Nephronectin is one of the basement membrane proteins whose expression and localization patterns are restricted in a tissue-specific and developmentally regulated manner (10, 11). Nephronectin consists of five epidermal growth factor-like repeats, a linker segment containing the RGD cell-adhesive motif (designated RGD-linker) and a meprin-A5 protein-receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase μ (MAM) domain (see Fig. 3A). Although the physiological functions of nephronectin remain only poorly understood, it is thought to play a role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions through binding to α8β1 integrin, thereby transmitting signals from the epithelium to the mesenchyme across the basement membrane (10). Recently, mice deficient in nephronectin expression were produced by homologous recombination (14). These nephronectin-deficient mice frequently displayed kidney agenesis, a phenotype reminiscent of α8 integrin knock-out mice (14), despite the fact that other RGD-containing ligands, including fibronectin and osteopontin, were expressed in the embryonic kidneys (9, 15). The failure of the other RGD-containing ligands to compensate for the deficiency of nephronectin in the developing kidneys suggests that nephronectin is an indispensable α8β1 ligand that plays a mandatory role in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions during kidney development.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 3.Binding activities of α8β1 integrin to nephronectin and its fragments. A, schematic diagrams of full-length nephronectin (NN) and its fragments. RGD-linker and RGD-linker (GST), the central RGD-containing linker segments expressed in mammalian and bacterial expression systems, respectively; PRGDV, a short RGD-containing peptide modeled after nephronectin and expressed as a GST fusion protein (see Fig. 4A for the peptide sequence). The arrowheads indicate the positions of the RGD motif. B, purified recombinant proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE in 7–15% gradient (left and center panels) and 12% (right panels) gels, followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining, immunoblotting with an anti-FLAG mAb, or lectin blotting with PNA. The quantities of proteins loaded were: 0.5 μg (for Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining) and 0.1 μg (for blotting with anti-FLAG and PNA) in the left and center panels;1 μg in the right panel. C, recombinant proteins (10 nm) were coated on microtiter plates and assessed for their binding activities toward α8β1 integrin (10 nm) in the presence of 1 mm Mn²⁺. The backgrounds were subtracted as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The results represent the mean ± S.D. of triplicate determinations. D, titration curves of α8β1 integrin bound to full-length nephronectin (NN, closed squares), the RGD-linker segments expressed in 293F cells (RGD-linker, closed triangles) and E. coli (RGD-linker (GST), open triangles), the MAM domain (MAM, closed diamonds), and the PRGDV peptide expressed as a GST fusion protein in E. coli (PRGDV (GST), open circles). The assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2B. The results represent the means of duplicate determinations.Although ligand recognition by RGD-binding integrins is primarily determined by the RGD motif in the ligands, it is the residues outside the RGD motif that define the binding specificities and affinities toward individual integrins (16, 17). For example, α5β1 integrin specifically binds to fibronectin among the many RGD-containing ligands, and requires not only the RGD motif in the 10th type III repeat but also the so-called “synergy site” within the preceding 9th type III repeat for fibronectin recognition (18). Recently, DiCara et al. (19) demonstrated that the high-affinity binding of αVβ6 integrin to its natural ligands, e.g. foot-and-mouth disease virus, requires the RGD motif immediately followed by a Leu-Xaa-Xaa-Leu/Ile sequence, which forms a helix to align the two conserved hydrophobic residues along the length of the helix. Given the presence of many naturally occurring RGD-containing ligands, it is conceivable that the specificities of the RGD-binding integrins are dictated by the sequences flanking the RGD motif or those in neighboring domains that come into close proximity with the RGD motif in the intact ligand proteins. However, the preferences of α8β1 integrin for RGD-containing ligands and how it secures its high-affinity binding toward its preferred ligands remain unknown.In the present study, we investigated the binding specificities of α8β1 integrin toward a panel of RGD-containing cell-adhesive proteins. Our data reveal that nephronectin is a preferred ligand for α8β1 integrin, and that a LFEIFEIER sequence on the C-terminal side of its RGD motif serves as a synergy site to ensure the specific high-affinity binding of nephronectin to α8β1 integrin.     

N-Glycosylation of the I-like Domain of ��1 Integrin Is Essential for ��1 Integrin Expression and Biological Function: IDENTIFICATION OF THE MINIMAL N-GLYCOSYLATION REQUIREMENT FOR ��5��1*

N-Glycosylation of integrin α5β1 plays a crucial role in cell spreading, cell migration, ligand binding, and dimer formation, but the detailed mechanisms by which N-glycosylation mediates these functions remain unclear. In a previous study, we showed that three potential N-glycosylation sites (α5S3–5) on the β-propeller of the α5 subunit are essential to the functional expression of the subunit. In particular, site 5 (α5S5) is the most important for its expression on the cell surface. In this study, the function of the N-glycans on the integrin β1 subunit was investigated using sequential site-directed mutagenesis to remove the combined putative N-glycosylation sites. Removal of the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit (i.e. the Δ4-6 mutant) decreased both the level of expression and heterodimeric formation, resulting in inhibition of cell spreading. Interestingly, cell spreading was observed only when the β1 subunit possessed these three N-glycosylation sites (i.e. the S4-6 mutant). Furthermore, the S4-6 mutant could form heterodimers with either α5S3-5 or α5S5 mutant of the α5 subunit. Taken together, the results of the present study reveal for the first time that N-glycosylation of the I-like domain of the β1 subunit is essential to both the heterodimer formation and biological function of the subunit. Moreover, because the α5S3-5/β1S4-6 mutant represents the minimal N-glycosylation required for functional expression of the β1 subunit, it might also be useful for the study of molecular structures.Integrin is a heterodimeric glycoprotein that consists of both an α and a β subunit (1). The interaction between integrin and the extracellular matrix is essential to both physiologic and pathologic events, such as cell migration, development, cell viability, immune homeostasis, and tumorigenesis (2, 3). Among the integrin superfamily, β1 integrin can combine with 12 distinct α subunits (α1–11, αv) to form heterodimers, thereby acquiring a wide variety of ligand specificity (1, 4). Integrins are thought to be regulated by inside-out signaling mechanisms that provoke conformational changes, which modulate the affinity of integrin for the ligand (5). However, an increasing body of evidence suggests that cell-surface carbohydrates mediate a variety of interactions between integrin and its extracellular environment, thereby affecting integrin activity and possibly tumor metastasis as well (6–8).Guo et al. (9) reported that an increase in β1–6-GlcNAc sugar chains on the integrin β1 subunit stimulated cell migration. In addition, elevated sialylation of the β1 subunit, because of Ras-induced STGal-I transferase activity, also induced cell migration (10, 11). Conversely, cell migration and spreading were reduced by the addition of a bisecting GlcNAc, which is a product of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnT-III),² to the α5β1 and α3β1 integrins (12, 13). Alterations of N-glycans on integrins might also regulate their cis interactions with membrane-associated proteins, including the epidermal growth factor receptor, the galectin family, and the tetraspanin family of proteins (14–19).In addition to the positive and negative regulatory effects of N-glycan, several research groups have reported that N-glycans must be present on integrin α5β1 for the αβ heterodimer formation and proper integrin-matrix interactions. Consistent with this hypothesis, in the presence of the glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin, normal integrin-substrate binding and transport to the cell surface are inhibited (20). Moreover, treatment of purified integrin with N-glycosidase F blocked both the inherent association of the subunits and the interaction between integrin and fibronectin (FN) (21). These results suggest that N-glycosylation is essential to the functional expression of α5β1. However, because integrin α5β1 contains 26 potential N-linked glycosylation sites, 14 in the α subunit and 12 in the β subunit, identification of the sites that are essential to its biological functions is key to understanding the molecular mechanisms by which N-glycans alter integrin function. Recently, our group determined that N-glycosylation of the β-propeller domain on the α5 subunit is essential to both heterodimerization and biological functions of the subunit. Furthermore, we determined that sites 3–5 are the most important sites for α5 subunit-mediated cell spreading and migration on FN (22). The purpose of this study was to clarify the roles of N-glycosylation of the β1 subunit. Therefore, we performed combined substitutions in the putative N-glycosylation sites by replacement of asparagine residues with glutamine residues. We subsequently introduced these mutated genes into β1-deficient epithelial cells (GE11). The results of these mutation experiments revealed that the N-glycosylation sites on the I-like domain of the β1 subunit, sites number 4–6 (S4-6), are essential to both heterodimer formation and biological functions, such as cell spreading.     

Dug1p Is a Cys-Gly Peptidase of the ��-Glutamyl Cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Represents a Novel Family of Cys-Gly Peptidases

GSH metabolism in yeast is carried out by the γ-glutamyl cycle as well as by the DUG complex. One of the last steps in the γ-glutamyl cycle is the cleavage of Cys-Gly by a peptidase to the constitutent amino acids. Saccharomyces cerevisiae extracts carry Cys-Gly dipeptidase activity, but the corresponding gene has not yet been identified. We describe the isolation and characterization of a novel Cys-Gly dipeptidase, encoded by the DUG1 gene. Dug1p had previously been identified as part of the Dug1p-Dug2p-Dug3p complex that operates as an alternate GSH degradation pathway and has also been suggested to function as a possible di- or tripeptidase based on genetic studies. We show here that Dug1p is a homodimer that can also function in a Dug2-Dug3-independent manner as a dipeptidase with high specificity for Cys-Gly and no activity toward tri- or tetrapeptides in vitro. This activity requires zinc or manganese ions. Yeast cells lacking Dug1p (dug1Δ) accumulate Cys-Gly. Unlike all other Cys-Gly peptidases, which are members of the metallopeptidase M17, M19, or M1 families, Dug1p is the first to belong to the M20A family. We also show that the Dug1p Schizosaccharomyces pombe orthologue functions as the exclusive Cys-Gly peptidase in this organism. The human orthologue CNDP2 also displays Cys-Gly peptidase activity, as seen by complementation of the dug1Δ mutant and by biochemical characterization, which revealed a high substrate specificity and affinity for Cys-Gly. The results indicate that the Dug1p family represents a novel class of Cys-Gly dipeptidases.GSH is a thiol-containing tripeptide (l-γ-glutamyl-l-cysteinyl-glycine) present in almost all eukaryotes (barring a few protozoa) and in a few prokaryotes (1). In the cell, glutathione exists in reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) forms. Its abundance (in the millimolar range), a relatively low redox potential (-240 mV), and a high stability conferred by the unusual peptidase-resistant γ-glutamyl bond are three of the properties endowing GSH with the attribute of an important cellular redox buffer. GSH also contributes to the scavenging of free radicals and peroxides, the chelation of heavy metals, such as cadmium, the detoxification of xenobiotics, the transport of amino acids, and the regulation of enzyme activities through glutathionylation and serves as a source of sulfur and nitrogen under starvation conditions (2, 3). GSH metabolism is carried out by the γ-glutamyl cycle, which coordinates its biosynthesis, transport, and degradation. The six-step cycle is schematically depicted in Fig. 1 (2).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.γ-Glutamyl cycle of glutathione metabolism. γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase and GSH synthetase carry out the first two steps in glutathione biosynthesis. γ-glutamyltranspeptidase, γ-glutamylcyclotransferase, 5-oxoprolinase, and Cys-Gly dipeptidase are involved in glutathione catabolism. Activities responsible for γ-glutamylcyclotransferase and 5-oxoprolinase have not been detected in S. cerevisiae.In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, γ-glutamyl cyclotransferase and 5-oxoprolinase activities have not been detected, which has led to the suggestion of the presence of an incomplete, truncated form of the γ-glutamyl cycle (4) made of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γGT)⁴ and Cys-Gly dipeptidase and only serving a GSH catabolic function. Although γGT and Cys-Gly dipeptidase activities were detected in S. cerevisiae cell extracts, only the γGT gene (ECM38) has been identified so far. Cys-Gly dipeptidase activity has been identified in humans (5, 6), rats (7–10), pigs (11, 12), Escherichia coli (13, 14), and other organisms (15, 16), and most of them belong to the M17 or the M1 and M19 metallopeptidases gene families (17).S. cerevisiae has an alternative γGT-independent GSH degradation pathway (18) made of the Dug1p, Dug2p, and Dug3p proteins that function together as a complex. Dug1p also seem to carry nonspecific di- and tripeptidase activity, based on genetic studies (19).We show here that Dug1p is a highly specific Cys-Gly dipeptidase, as is its Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue. We also show that the mammalian orthologue of DUG1, CNDP2, can complement the defective utilization of Cys-Gly as sulfur source of an S. cerevisiae strain lacking DUG1 (dug1Δ). Moreover, CNDP2 has Cys-Gly dipeptidase activity in vitro, with a strong preference for Cys-Gly over all other dipeptides tested. CNDP2 and its homologue CNDP1 are members of the metallopeptidases M20A family and have been known to carry carnosine (β-alanyl-histidine) and carnosine-like (homocarnosine and anserine) peptidase activity (20, 21). This study thus reveals that the metallopeptidase M20A family represents a novel Cys-Gly peptidase family, since only members of the M19, M1, and M17 family were known to carry this function.