The birth of immunology. III. The fate of the phagocytosis theory.

During the period of 1895-1910, immunology was preoccupied with defining the cellular (Elie Metchnikoff's phagocytosis theory) as opposed to the humoral basis of bactericidal defense. Although initial discovery of immunopathologic phenomena had been made (e.g., relating to transplantation, autoimmunity, allergy), focus on microbicidal therapy and diagnosis of infectious diseases remained the major stimuli of inquiry. The debate concerning the relative roles of phagocytes, complement, amboceptors (sensibilizing factors, antibody, antitoxins), various lysins (e.g., bacteriolysins, spermatolysins, hemolysins), agglutinins, stimulines, and then Almoth Wright's opsonins reflects the ambiguity of a scientific language being created in an era still struggling with a poorly defined experimental system, for the language, both its vocabulary (newly studied phenomena) and grammar (operational mechanisms) was yet to be codified. The joint award of the Nobel Prize to Metchnikoff and Paul Ehrlich in 1908 for their respective contributions to the "theory of immunity" appeared to proclaim a consensus, but the secret Nobel Committee reports that evaluated Metchnikoff's contributions reveal only a grudging acceptance of his position, and the award was clearly made on the basis of an apparent complementarity between the theoretical views of the humoralists and those elements of the phagocytosis theory that fit the then current discussion of immunity. In this regard, opsonins played an especially important role as both an experimental and conceptual bridge between the competing schools. What was no longer under consideration (and in fact never was explicitly debated) concerned the intellectual foundation of Metchnikoff's original concept of immunity as those activities that defined organismal identity, (developed from Metchnikoff's research in developmental biology) and which regarded host defense mechanisms as only subordinate to this primary function. Immunology in the first half of the 20th century pursued issues pertinent to chemically characterizing immune specificity and only later returned to the Metchnikovian question of how the immune identity was established. This latter venture has achieved molecular sophistication, but even such a formulation may be an inadequate answer to the Metchnikovian postulate. The theoretical discussion between cellularists and humoralists continues in new guises, for the essential debate remains unresolved.     

The fine structure of the cysticercoid of Hymenolepis diminuta. III. The scolex.

Transmission electron microscopy of the scolex of the 8-day-old Hymenolepis diminuta cysticercoid demonstrates its resemblance to the scolex of the adult. A syncytial tegument composed of external and internal layers is connected by cytoplasmic extensions. Fully developed microtriches are present. Furthermore, a basement membrane, muscle layers, and medullary region containing flame cells, nerve tissue, and other cell bodies are observed. Of particular interest is the presence of discrete sensory endings whose function is discussed.     

The association of bovine beta-casein. The importance of the C-terminal region.

Bovine beta-casein exists in the monomer form in solution (pH 6.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.5% w/v) at low temperatures, but associates to form polymers at higher temperatures. Gel filtration chromatography at 36 degrees showed that the polymer is large with a hydrodynamic size greater than that of a globular protein with a mol wt of 1.34 times 10(6). Removal of two C-terminal amino acids per molecule decreased the proportion of polymer in the solution, although the chromatographic behavior of the modified beta-casein monomers and polymers was retained. Removal of a 20 amino acid peptide from the C terminus of the beta-casein completely destroyed its ability to form polymers and removed the 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonate binding site. However, deletion of segments of the protein from the N terminus did not decrease the ability of the modified beta-casein to associate, nor did it affect the 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonate binding site greatly. It seems likely that all, or some, of the 20 amino acids at the C terminus are responsible for the associative behavior of beta-casein, possibly by the direct participation of their side chains in hydrophobic bond formation. However, removal of the C-terminal peptides may have disrupted the spatial structure of the native protein so that it could no longer associate normally.