Use of a novel pacing mode to achieve biventricular pacing in a patient with recurrent atrial lead dislodgement after CRT-D implantation

Cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT-P and CRT-D) implantation has increased tremendously with increasing operator experience, eligible patients and expansion of indications. Refinements in devices and algorithms now aid physicians to improve biventricular pacing and optimize CRT. We report a case in which an interesting device program was used to achieve biventricular pacing after repeated dislodgement of the atrial lead in a patient implanted with CRT-D.     

Mechanically induced electrical storm as a complication of cardiac resynchronization therapy: A case report

BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve both the functional status and mortality of heart failure patients with left bundle branch block. Multiple recent studies suggest several mechanisms for proarrhythmia associated with CRT device.Case summaryA 51-year-old male with symptomatic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and no previous history of ventricular arrhythmias underwent placement of a biventricular cardioverter-defibrillator. The patient developed sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) soon after implantation. The VT recurred despite reprogramming to right ventricular only pacing. The electrical storm resolved only after a subsequent discharge from the defibrillator caused inadvertent dislodgement of the coronary sinus lead. No recurrent VT occurred throughout 10-years follow up after urgent coronary sinus lead revision.DiscussionWe describe the first reported case of mechanically induced electrical storm due to the physical presence of the CS lead in a patient with a new CRT-D device. It is important to recognize mechanical proarrhythmia as a potential mechanism of electrical storm, as it may be intractable to device reprogramming. Urgent coronary sinus lead revision should be considered. Further studies on this mechanism of proarrhythmia are needed.     

Desynchronization in a cardiac resynchronization device induced by a pacemaker-mediated tachycardia algorithm

This report describes the occurrence of desynchronization in a patient with a cardiac resynchronization device programmed with an active pacemaker-mediated tachycardia algorithm based on AV delay modification. Desynchronization was precipitated by sinus tachycardia and the abrupt return of the prevailing AV delay that followed the periodic prolongation of the AV delay mandated by activity of the algorithm. Prevention of desynchronization in this setting requires programming a right ventricular upper rate interval longer than the sum of the programmed ventriculoatrial interval and the AV delay.     

Cardiac resynchronization: insight from experimental and computational models

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a promising therapy for heart failure patients with a conduction disturbance, such as left bundle branch block. The aim of CRT is to resynchronize contraction between and within ventricles. However, about 30% of patients do not respond to this therapy. Therefore, a better understanding is needed for the relation between electrical and mechanical activation. In this paper, we focus on to what extent animal experiments and mathematical models can help in order to understand the pathophysiology of asynchrony to further improve CRT.     

Right ventricular pacing and sensing function in high posterior septal and apical lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BackgroundThe conventional right ventricular (RV) lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) is the RV apex (RV-A). Little is known about electrophysiological stability and associated complications of pacing leads in RV high posterior septal (RV-HS) position in CRT-P.MethodsTwo hundred and thirty-five consecutive CRT-P patients were included from 1999-2010. Pacing thresholds at 0.5 ms and 2.5 V, sensing electrograms and lead impedances were measured at implant and repeated 1,3,6,12,18 and 24 months after CRT-P. Electrophysiological measurements of leads located in RV-A and RV-HS were analyzed retrospectively. Bipolar RV leads were used, including high impedance leads, passive fixation and active fixation.ResultsRV pacing leads were implanted in RV-A (n = 79) and RV-HS (n = 156). Average RV pacing thresholds from CRT implant procedure to 24-month follow-up at 0.5 ms were 0.77 ± 0.69 V in RV-A and 0.71 ± 0.35 V in RV-HS (P = 0.31), and at 2.5 V were 0.06 ± 0.08 ms in RV-A and 0.07 ± 0.05 ms in RV-HS (P = 0.12). Average RV electrogram amplitudes from baseline to 24 months after CRT were 15.3 ± 6.9 mV in RV-A and 12.1 ± 6.0 mV in RV-HS (P = 0.55). Average RV impedances during follow-up were 850 ± 286Ω in RV-A and 618 ± 147Ω in RV-HS (P = 0.57). Similar RV lead revisions between RV-A and RV-HS were observed after 2-year follow-up (P = 0.55).ConclusionsThe RV-HS lead position demonstrated stable and acceptable long-term pacing and sensing function, with rates of complications comparable to conventional RV-A lead position in CRT. The RV-HS lead position is feasible in CRT-P.     

Left ventricular endocardial pacing in cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Moving from bench to bedside

In cardiac resynchronisation therapy, failure to implant a left ventricular lead in a coronary sinus branch has been reported in up to 10% of cases. Although surgical insertion of epicardial leads is considered the standard alternative, this is not without morbidity and technical limitations. Endocardial left ventricular pacing can be an alternative as it has been associated with a favourable acute haemodynamic response compared with epicardial pacing in both animal and human studies. In this paper, we discuss left ventricular endocardial pacing and compare it with epicardial surgical implantation. Ease of application and procedural complications and morbidity compare favourably with epicardial surgical techniques. However, with limited experience, the most important concern is the still unknown long-term risk of thromboembolic complications. Therefore, for now endovascular implants should remain reserved for severely symptomatic heart failure patients and patients at high surgical risk of failed coronary sinus implantation.     

Haemodynamic evaluation of alternative left ventricular endocardial pacing sites in clinical non-responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy

Introduction

Non response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) may be related to the position of the coronary sinus lead.

Methods

We studied the acute haemodynamic response (AHR) from alternative left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing sites in clinical non-responders to CRT. AHR and the interval from QRS onset to LV sensing (Q-LV interval) from four different endocardial pacing sites were evaluated in 24 clinical non-responders. A rise in LVdP/dtmax ≥ 15 % from baseline was considered a positive AHR. We also compared the AHR from endocardial with the corresponding epicardial lead position.

Results

The implanted system showed an AHR ≥ 15 % in 5 patients. In 9 of the 19 remaining patients, AHR could be elevated to ≥ 15 % by endocardial LV pacing. The optimal endocardial pacing site was posterolateral. There was no significant difference in AHR between the epicardial and the corresponding endocardial position. The longest Q-LV interval corresponded with the best AHR in 12 out of the 14 patients with a positive AHR, with an average Q-LV/QRS width ratio of 90 %.

Conclusions

Acute haemodynamic testing may indicate an alternative endocardial pacing site with a positive AHR in clinical non-responders. The Q-LV interval is a strongly correlated with the optimal endocardial pacing site. Endocardial pacing opposite epicardial sites does not result in a better AHR.     

Left ventricle pacing challenges in cardiac resynchronization therapy systems

Left ventricle (LV) pacing can be considered peculiar due to its different lead/tissue interface (epicardial pacing) and the small vein wedging lead locations with less reliable lead stability. The current technologies available for LV capture automatic confirmation adopt the evoked response (ER), as well as “LV pace to right ventricular (RV) sense” algorithms. The occurrence of anodal RV capture is today completely solved by the use of bipolar LV leads, while intriguing data are recently published regarding the unintentional LV anodal capture beside the cathodal one, which may enlarge the front wave of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivery. The LV threshold behavior over time leading to ineffective CRT issues (subthreshold stimulation or concealed loss of capture), the extracardiac capture with phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), the flexible electronic cathode reprogramming and the inadequate CRT delivery related to inadequate AV and VV pace timing (and its management by LV “dromotropic pace-conditioning”) are discussed.Moreover, recently, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) have shown growing interest to prevent pacing-induced cardiomyopathy as well as for direct intentional CRT.The purpose of the present review is to explore these new challenges regarding LV pacing starting from old concepts.     

Optimisation of cardiac resynchronization therapy in clinical practice during exercise

Aims

Although cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an established treatment to improve cardiac function, a significant amount of patients do not experience noticeable improvement in their cardiac function. Optimal timing of the delay between atrial and ventricular pacing pulses (AV delay) is of major importance for effective CRT treatment and this optimum may differ between resting and exercise conditions. In this study the feasibility of haemodynamic measurements by the non-invasive finger plethysmographic method (Nexfin) was used to optimise the AV delay during exercise.

Methods and results

Thirty-one patients implanted with a CRT device in the last 4 years participated in the study. During rest and in exercise, stroke volume (SV) was measured using the Nexfin device for several AV delays. The optimal AV delay at rest and in exercise was determined using the least squares estimates (LSE) method. Optimisation created a clinically significant improvement in SV of 10 %. The relation between HR and the optimal AV delay was patient dependent.

Conclusion

A potential increase in SV of 10 % can be achieved using Nexfin for optimisation of AV delay during exercise. A considerable number of patients showed benefit with lengthening of the AV delay during exercise.     

Snare technique for coronary sinus cannulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy

PurposeBiventricular pacing is a mainstay of therapy for patients with heart failure. However, lead implantations may fail due to anatomical reasons including the impossibility of coronary sinus cannulation.Methods and resultsA dual approach from the subclavian vein using a snare through a sheath and from the femoral vein using a steerable electrophysiology catheter was performed. Once the snare hooked the catheter, the latter was advanced into the coronary sinus and finally, the sheath could also be advanced in an “over-the-wire” technique.ConclusionThe snare technique for coronary sinus cannulation offers a “bail-out” strategy for left ventricular lead implantation.     

犬双心室多点组合同步起搏的心肌力学效应研究

目的 :探讨多点组合同步心室起搏对犬心肌收缩 /舒张力学效应和心脏作功的影响。方法 :12只犬 ,随机进行 5种组合模式的双心室同步起搏 ,并以自身窦性心律状态 (SNR )作为对照。记录各起搏状态下 :左室内压上升和下降最大数率 (±dp/dtmax)、左室松弛时间常数 (τ)、左 /右室游离壁室壁肌张力 (L/RV tensileforce ,L/RV TF)、每搏量 (SV )、左室每搏功 (LVSW )和右室每搏功 (RVSW )等心肌收缩 /舒张力学和心脏作功参数。结果 :双室cHisB LVPL起搏和RVA LVPL起搏的心肌收缩力学参数 +dp/dtmax和L/RV TF较右室双点cHisB RVA起搏增加 ,前两组的心肌舒张力学参数 dp/dtmax也较cHisB RVA起搏增加 ,而τ值较后者缩短。双室三点cHisB RVA LVPL起搏和cHisB RVA LVA起搏的上述各参数均优于双室cHisB LVPL起搏和RVA LVPL起搏。而cHisB RVA LVPL起搏的 +dp/dtmax和L/RV TF均较cHisB RVA LVA起搏增加。cHisB RVA LVPL起搏 dp/dtmax较cHisB RVA LVA起搏提高 6.0 % ,τ值缩短 3 .7%。cHisB LVPL起搏和RVA LVPL起搏的SV、LVSW和RVSW等心室作功参数均较cHisB RVA起搏增加 ,而HisB RVA LVPL起搏的上述心脏作功各参数 ,亦分别较cHisB RVA LVA起搏和cHisB LVPL起搏有不同程度的增加。结论 :双室三点cHisB RVA LVPL组合同     

Prognostic value of nutrition status in the response of cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated in symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients after achieving optimal medical therapy. However, there are still a large percentage of patients who do not respond to CRT. Malnutrition is a frequent comorbidity in patients with HF, and it is associated with a poorer prognosis. Here, we evaluate the nutritional status of patients assessed by Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and its association with structural remodeling and cardiovascular events.

Chronic cardiac resynchronization therapy and reverse ventricular remodeling in a model of nonischemic cardiomyopathy

While cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF) patients, the fundamental mechanisms for the efficacy of CRT are poorly understood. The lack of understanding of these basic mechanisms represents a significant barrier to our understanding of the pathogenesis of HF and potential recovery mechanisms. Our purpose was to determine cellular mechanisms for the observed improvement in chronic HF after CRT. We used a canine model of chronic nonischemic cardiomyopathy. After 15 months, dogs were randomized to continued RV tachypacing (untreated HF) or CRT for an additional 9 months. Six minute walk tests, echocardiograms, and electrocardiograms were done to assess the functional response to therapy. Left ventricular (LV) midmyocardial myocytes were isolated to study electrophysiology and intracellular calcium regulation. Compared to untreated HF, CRT improved HF-induced increases in LV volumes, diameters and mass (p<0.05). CRT reversed HF-induced prolongations in LV myocyte repolarization (p<0.05) and normalized HF-induced depolarization (p<0.03) of the resting membrane potential. CRT improved HF-induced reductions in calcium (p<0.05). CRT did not attenuate the HF-induced increases in LV interstitial fibrosis. Using a translational approach in a chronic HF model, CRT significantly improved LV structure; this was accompanied by improved LV myocyte electrophysiology and calcium regulation. The beneficial effects of CRT may be attributable, in part, to improved LV myocyte function.     

Anodal stimulation: an underrecognized cause of nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine if anodal stimulation accounts for failure to benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in some patients.

Background

Approximately 30-40% of patients with moderate to severe heart failure do not have symptomatic nor echocardiographic improvement in cardiac function following CRT. Modern CRT devices allow the option of programming left ventricular (LV) lead pacing as LV tip to right ventricular (RV) lead coil to potentially improve pacing thresholds. However, anodal stimulation can result in unintentional RV pacing (anode) instead of LV pacing (cathode).

Methods

Patients enrolled in our center''s CRT registry had an echocardiogram, 6-minute walk (6MW), and Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLHFQ) pre-implant and 6 months after CRT. Electrocardiograms (12 lead) during RV, LV, and biventricular (BiV) pacing were obtained at the end of the implant in 102 patients. Anodal stimulation was defined as LV pacing QRS morphology on EKG being identical to RV pacing or consistent with fusion with RV and LV electrode capture. LV end systolic volume (LVESV) was measured by echo biplane Simpson''s method and CRT responder was defined as 15% or greater reduction in LVESV.

Results

Of the 102 patients, 46 (45.1%) had the final LV lead pacing configuration programmed LV (tip or ring) to RV (coil or ring). 3 of the 46 subjects (6.5%) had EKG findings consistent with anodal stimulation, not corrected intraoperatively. All anodal stimulation patients were nonresponders to CRT by echo criteria (reduction in LVESV 13.3 ± 0.6%, increase in EF 5.0 ± 1.4%) compared to 46% responders for those without anodal stimulation, (change in LVESV 18.7 ± 25.6%, EF 7.6 ±10.9%). None of the anodal stimulation patients were responders for the 6 minute walk, compared to 32 of 66 (48%) of those without anodal stimulation.

Conclusion

Anodal stimulation is a potential underrecognized and ameliorable cause of poor response to CRT.     

Influence of intrinsic myocardial conduction on paced QRS morphology during cardiac resynchronization therapy follow up

We report two cases of patients of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) whose ECGs, during follow up, showed different paced QRS morphology as compared to those of immediate post-device implantation. Parameters of leads, including sensitivity and capture thresholds, were unchanged. There was no lead dislodgement confirmed on fluoroscopy. The ECGs obtained in device off mode showed different intrinsic QRS morphology as compared to those of pre-implant morphology. These changes were attributable to electrolyte imbalance in one patient and progressive intraventricular conduction defect in the other. These cases demonstrate that intrinsic myocardial conduction pattern influences paced QRS morphology. Irreversible change in paced QRS morphology may indicate poor prognosis.     

Decoupled time-marching schemes in computational cardiac electrophysiology and ECG numerical simulation

This work considers the approximation of the cardiac bidomain equations, either isolated or coupled with the torso, via first order semi-implicit time-marching schemes involving a fully decoupled computation of the unknown fields (ionic state, transmembrane potential, extracellular and torso potentials). For the isolated bidomain system, we show that the Gauss-Seidel and Jacobi like splittings do not compromise energy stability; they simply alter the energy norm. Within the framework of the numerical simulation of electrocardiograms (ECG), these bidomain splittings are combined with an explicit Robin-Robin treatment of the heart-torso coupling conditions. We show that the resulting schemes allow a fully decoupled (energy) stable computation of the heart and torso fields, under an additional hyperbolic-CFL like condition. The accuracy and convergence rate of the considered schemes are investigated numerically with a series of numerical experiments.     

MRI and cardiac implantable electronic devices; current status and required safety conditions

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved into an essential diagnostic modality for the evaluation of all patient categories. This gain in popularity coincided with an increase in the number of implanted cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Therefore, questions arose with regard to the MRI compatibility of these devices. Various investigators have reported the harmless performance of MRI in patients with conventional (non-MRI conditional) devices. The recently published European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) indicate that MRI can be safely performed in patients with an implanted pacemaker or ICD (MRI conditional or not), as long as strict safety conditions are met. This is a major modification of the former general opinion that patients with a pacemaker or ICD were not eligible to undergo MRI. This review paper attempts to elucidate the current situation for practising cardiologists by providing a clear overview of the potential life-threatening interactions and discuss safety measures to be taken prior to and during scanning. An overview of all available MRI conditional devices and their individual restrictions is given. In addition, an up-to-date safety protocol is provided that can be used to ensure patient safety before, during and after the scan.Key points• Historically, MRI examination of patients with a CIED has been considered hazardous.• Ongoing advances in technology and increasing usage of MRI in clinical practice have led to the introduction of MRI conditional CIEDs and to more lenient regulations on the examination of patients with non-conditional CIEDs.• MRI investigations can be performed safely in selected patients when adhering to a standardised up-to-date safety protocol.     

Marshall to the rescue in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Left ventricular lead placement in coronary sinus ostial atresia

This case highlights the importance of proper identification of congenital anomalies of the coronary sinus for the successful placement of left ventricular lead during cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation. We discuss an alternate route for left ventricular lead placement via the vein of Marshall when the coronary sinus ostium in the right atrium was atretic and was facing difficulty initially in detecting the anomaly.     

Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture for cardiac devices implantation in patients under antithrombotic therapy

BackgroundUltrasound-guided axillary venous puncture (UGAVP) for cardiac devices implantation has been developed because of its rapidity, safety and potential long-term lead protection. Early work excluded defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and upgrade procedures. Compared to the cephalic approach, in previous studies, there was a greater use of pressure dressings with this technique, suggesting a higher risk of bleeding.AimsTo assess UGAVP in patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) undergoing cardiac devices implantation including CRT/ICD.MethodsProspectively, consecutive patients eligible for a pacemaker or ICD implantation were included. All procedures were performed by a single operator, experienced with UGAVP for femoral access, and fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access. Guidewires insertion time (from lidocaïne administration), and complications were systematically studied.ResultsFrom 457 cardiac device implantations, 200 patients (77.8 ± 10 y, male 58%) 360 leads were implanted by UGAVP including 36 ICD, 54 CRT and 14 upgrade procedures. A majority (90%) was under ATT: Vitamin K Antagonist or Heparin (n = 58, 29%), direct oral anticoagulant (n = 46, 23%), dual antithrombotic therapy (n = 18, 9%) and single antiplatelet drug (n = 82, 41%). UGAVP was successful in 95.78%. Mean insertion time for 1.8 guidewires per patient was 4.68 ± 3.6 min. No complication (no hematoma) was observed during the follow-up (mean of 45 ± 10 months). Guidewires insertion time reached its plateau after 15 patients.ConclusionUGAVP is fast, feasible and safe for patients under ATT undergoing device implantation including CRT/ICD and upgrade procedures, with a short learning curve.