Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage by DNA glycosylases

Oxidative damage to DNA caused by free radicals and other oxidants generate base and sugar damage, strand breaks, clustered sites, tandem lesions and DNA-protein cross-links. Oxidative DNA damage is mainly repaired by base-excision repair in living cells with the involvement of DNA glycosylases in the first step and other enzymes in subsequent steps. DNA glycosylases remove modified bases from DNA, generating an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. Some of these enzymes that remove oxidatively modified DNA bases also possess AP-lyase activity to cleave DNA at AP sites. DNA glycosylases possess varying substrate specificities, and some of them exhibit cross-activity for removal of both pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. Most studies on substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases were performed using oligonucleotides with a single modified base incorporated at a specific position. Other studies used high-molecular weight DNA containing multiple pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. In this case, substrate specificities and excision kinetics were found to be different from those observed with oligonucleotides. This paper reviews substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases for removal of pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions in high-molecular weight DNA.     

Combining structural and bioinformatics methods for the analysis of functionally important residues in DNA glycosylases

An essential function of DNA glycosylases is the recognition and excision of damaged bases in DNA, thereby preserving genomic integrity. Lesion recognition is a multistep process, which is only partially revealed by structural analysis of the catalytically competent complex. The functional role of additional residues can be predicted by combining structural data with analysis of amino acid conservation. The following postulate underlies this approach: if a family or superfamily can be broken into subgroups with different substrate specificities, residues highly conserved between these subgroups represent those important for enzyme catalysis and structure maintenance while residues highly conserved within a subgroup but not between subgroups represent residues important for substrate specificity. We review the bioinformatics approach used for this quantitative analysis and describe its application to the Nth superfamily and Fpg family of DNA glycosylases. These results serve as a starting point in planning site-directed mutagenesis experiments to elucidate the functional role of similar and dissimilar residues in DNA repair and other proteins.     

Eukaryotic endonuclease VIII-Like proteins: New components of the base excision DNA repair system

Base excision DNA repair is necessary for removal of damaged nucleobases from the genome and their replacement with normal nucleobases. Base excision repair is initiated by DNA glycosylases, the enzymes that cleave the N-glycosidic bonds of damaged deoxynucleotides. Until recently, only eight DNA glycosylases with different substrate specificity were known in human cells. In 2002, three new human DNA glycosylases (NEIL1, NEIL2, and NEIL3) were discovered, all homologous to endonuclease VIII, a bacterial protein, which also participates in DNA repair. The role of these enzymes remains mostly unknown. In this review we discuss recent data on the substrate specificity of the NEIL enzymes, their catalytic mechanism, structure, interactions with other components of DNA repair system, and possible biological role in preventing diseases associated with DNA damage.     

Mouse NEIL1 protein is specific for excision of 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine and 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine from oxidatively damaged DNA

A functional homologue of human DNA glycosylase NEIL1 (hNEIL1) in mouse has recently been cloned, isolated, characterized, and named mouse NEIL1 (mNEIL1). This enzyme exhibited specificity for excision of oxidatively modified pyrimidine bases such as thymine glycol, 5,6-dihydrouracil, and 5-hydroxypyrimidines, using oligonucleotides with a single base lesion incorporated at a specific site. It also acted upon AP sites; however, no significant excision of 8-hydroxyguanine was observed [Rosenquist, T. A., Zaika, E., Fernandes, A. S., Zharkov, D. O., Miller, H., and Grollman, A. P. (2003) DNA Repair 2, 581-591]. We investigated the substrate specificity and excision kinetics of mNEIL1 for excision of oxidatively modified bases from high-molecular weight DNA with multiple lesions, which were generated by exposure of DNA in aqueous solution to ionizing radiation. Among a large number of pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions detected and quantified in DNA, only purine-derived lesions 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine and 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine were significantly excised. This finding establishes that mNEIL1 and its functional homologue hNEIL1 possess common substrates, namely, 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine and 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine. Measurement of excision kinetics showed that mNEIL1 possesses equal specificity for these two formamidopyrimidines. This enzyme also excised thymine-derived lesions thymine glycol and 5-hydroxy-5-methylhydantoin, albeit at a much lower rate. A comparison of the specificity and excision kinetics of mNEIL1 with other DNA glycosylases shows that this enzyme is as efficient as those DNA glycosylases, which specifically remove the formamidopyrimidines from DNA.     

Chemical approaches toward understanding base excision DNA repair

Despite the importance of DNA repair in protecting the genome, the molecular basis for damage recognition and repair remains poorly understood. In the base excision repair pathway (BER), DNA glycosylases recognize and excise damaged bases from DNA. This review focuses on the recent development of chemical approaches that have been applied to the study of BER enzymes. Several distinctive classes of noncleavable substrate analogs that form stable complexes with DNA glycosylases have recently been designed and synthesized. These analogs have been used for biochemical and structural analyses of protein—DNA complexes involving DNA glycosylases, and for the isolation of a novel DNA glycosylase. An approach to trap covalently a DNA glycosylase-intermediate complex has also been used to elucidate the mechanism of DNA glycosylases.     

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases—Structural and functional perspectives on an essential family of DNA repair enzymes

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases (UDGs) are evolutionarily conserved DNA repair enzymes that initiate the base excision repair pathway and remove uracil from DNA. The UDG superfamily is classified into six families based on their substrate specificity. This review focuses on the family I enzymes since these are the most extensively studied members of the superfamily. The structural basis for substrate specificity and base recognition as well as for DNA binding, nucleotide flipping and catalytic mechanism is discussed in detail. Other topics include the mechanism of lesion search and molecular mimicry through interaction with uracil‐DNA glycosylase inhibitors. The latest studies and findings detailing structure and function in the UDG superfamily are presented.     

Base J, found in nuclear DNA of Trypanosoma brucei, is not a target for DNA glycosylases

Base excision repair (BER) is an evolutionarily conserved system which removes altered bases from DNA. The initial step in BER is carried out by DNA glycosylases which recognize altered bases and cut the N-glycosylic bond between the base and the DNA backbone. In kinetoplastid flagellates, such as Trypanosoma brucei, the modified base beta-D-glucosyl-hydroxymethyluracil (J) replaces a small percentage of thymine residues, predominantly in repetitive telomeric sequences. Base J is synthesized at the DNA level via the precursor 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5-HmU). We have investigated whether J in DNA can be recognized by DNA glycosylases from non-kinetoplastid origin, and whether the presence of J and 5-HmU in DNA has required modifications of the trypanosome BER system. We tested the ability of 15 different DNA glycosylases from various origins to excise J or 5-HmU paired to A from duplex oligonucleotides. No excision of J was found, but 5-HmU was excised by AlkA and Mug from Escherichia coli and by human SMUG1 and TDG, confirming previous reports. In a combination of database searches and biochemical assays we identified several DNA glycosylases in T. brucei, but in trypanosome extracts we detected no excision activity towards 5-HmU or ethenocytosine, a product of oxidative DNA damage and a substrate for Mug, TDG and SMUG1. Our results indicate that trypanosomes have a BER system similar to that of other organisms, but might be unable to excise certain forms of oxidatively damaged bases. The presence of J in DNA does not require a specific modification of the BER system, as this base is not recognized by any known DNA glycosylase.     

Substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases involved in base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage

Reactive oxygen-derived species such as free radicals are formed in living cells by normal metabolism and exogenous sources, and cause a variety of types of DNA damage such as base and sugar damage, strand breaks and DNA-protein cross-links. Living organisms possess repair systems that repair DNA damage. Oxidative DNA damage caused by free radicals and other oxidizing agents is mainly repaired by base-excision repair (BER), which involves DNA glycosylases in the first step of the repair process. These enzymes remove modified bases from DNA by hydrolyzing the glycosidic bond between the modified base and the sugar moiety, generating an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site. Some also possess AP lyase activity that subsequently cleaves DNA at AP sites. Many DNA glycosylases have been discovered and isolated, and their reaction mechanisms and substrate specificities have been elucidated. Most of the known products of oxidative damage to DNA are substrates of DNA glycosylases with broad or narrow substrate specificities. Some possess cross-activity and remove both pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. Overlapping activities between enzymes also exist. Studies of substrate specificities have been performed using either oligodeoxynucleotides with a single modified base embedded at a specific position or damaged DNA substrates containing a multiplicity of pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. This paper reviews the substrate specificities and excision kinetics of DNA glycosylases that have been investigated with the use of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and DNA substrates with multiple lesions.     

Crystal structures of 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase MagIII and the recognition of alkylated bases

DNA glycosylases catalyze the excision of chemically modified bases from DNA. Although most glycosylases are specific to a particular base, the 3-methyladenine (m3A) DNA glycosylases include both highly specific enzymes acting on a single modified base, and enzymes with broader specificity for alkylation-damaged DNA. Our structural understanding of these different enzymatic specificities is currently limited to crystal and NMR structures of the unliganded enzymes and complexes with abasic DNA inhibitors. Presented here are high-resolution crystal structures of the m3A DNA glycosylase from Helicobacter pylori (MagIII) in the unliganded form and bound to alkylated bases 3,9-dimethyladenine and 1,N6-ethenoadenine. These are the first structures of a nucleobase bound in the active site of a m3A glycosylase belonging to the helix-hairpin-helix superfamily. MagIII achieves its specificity for positively-charged m3A not by direct interactions with purine or methyl substituent atoms, but rather by stacking the base between two aromatic side chains in a pocket that excludes 7-methylguanine. We report base excision and DNA binding activities of MagIII active site mutants, together with a structural comparison of the HhH glycosylases.     

Substrate specificity and sequence-dependent activity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase (Mag)

DNA glycosylases initiate base excision repair by first binding, then excising aberrant DNA bases. Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a 3-methyladenine (3MeA) DNA glycosylase, Mag, that recognizes 3MeA and various other DNA lesions including 1,N6-ethenoadenine (epsilon A), hypoxanthine (Hx) and abasic (AP) sites. In the present study, we explore the relative substrate specificity of Mag for these lesions and in addition, show that Mag also recognizes cisplatin cross-linked adducts, but does not catalyze their excision. Through competition binding and activity studies, we show that in the context of a random DNA sequence Mag binds epsilon A and AP-sites the most tightly, followed by the cross-linked 1,2-d(ApG) cisplatin adduct. While epsilon A binding and excision by Mag was robust in this sequence context, binding and excision of Hx was extremely poor. We further studied the recognition of epsilon A and Hx by Mag, when these lesions are present at different positions within A:T and G:C tracts. Overall, epsilon A was slightly less well excised from each position within the A:T and G:C tracts compared to excision from the random sequence, whereas Hx excision was greatly increased in these sequence contexts (by up to 7-fold) compared to the random sequence. However, given most sequence contexts, Mag had a clear preference for epsilon A relative to Hx, except in the TTXTT (X=epsilon A or Hx) sequence context from which Mag removed both lesions with almost equal efficiency. We discuss how DNA sequence context affects base excision by various 3MeA DNA glycosylases.     

Release of normal bases from intact DNA by a native DNA repair enzyme.

Base excision repair is initiated by DNA glycosylases removing inappropriate bases from DNA. One group of these enzymes, comprising 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II (AlkA) from Escherichia coli and related enzymes from other organisms, has been found to have an unusual broad specificity towards quite different base structures. We tested whether such enzymes might also be capable of removing normal base residues from DNA. The native enzymes from E.coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and human cells promoted release of intact guanines with significant frequencies, and further analysis of AlkA showed that all the normal bases can be removed. Transformation of E. coli with plasmids expressing different levels of AlkA produced an increased spontaneous mutation frequency correlated with the expression levels, indicating that excision of normal bases occurs at biologically significant rates. We propose that the broad specificity 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylases represent a general type of repair enzyme 'pulling' bases in DNA largely at random, without much preference for a specific structure. The specificity for release of damaged bases occurs because base structure alterations cause instability of the base-sugar bonds. Damaged bases are therefore released more readily than normal bases once the bond activation energy is reduced further by the enzyme. Qualitatively, the model correlates quite well with the relative rate of excision observed for most, if not all, of the substrates described for AlkA and analogues.     

Imbalanced Base Excision Repair Increases Spontaneous Mutation and Alkylation Sensitivity in Escherichia coli

Inappropriate expression of 3-methyladenine (3MeA) DNA glycosylases has been shown to have harmful effects on microbial and mammalian cells. To understand the underlying reasons for this phenomenon, we have determined how DNA glycosylase activity and substrate specificity modulate glycosylase effects in Escherichia coli. We compared the effects of two 3MeA DNA glycosylases with very different substrate ranges, namely, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mag1 and the E. coli Tag glycosylases. Both glycosylases increased spontaneous mutation, decreased cell viability, and sensitized E. coli to killing by the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate. However, Tag had much less harmful effects than Mag1. The difference between the two enzymes' effects may be accounted for by the fact that Tag almost exclusively excises 3MeA lesions, whereas Mag1 excises a broad range of alkylated and other purines. We infer that the DNA lesions responsible for changes in spontaneous mutation, viability, and alkylation sensitivity are abasic sites and secondary lesions resulting from processing abasic sites via the base excision repair pathway.     

Recent progress in the biology, chemistry and structural biology of DNA glycosylases

Since the discovery in 1974 of uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), the first member of the family of enzymes involved in base excision repair (BER), considerable progress has been made in the understanding of DNA glycosylases, the polypeptides that remove damaged or mispaired DNA bases from DNA. We also know the enzymes that act downstream of the glycosylases, in the processing of abasic sites, in gap filling and in DNA ligation. This article covers the most recent developments in our understanding of BER, with particular emphasis on the mechanistic aspects of this process, which have been made possible by the elucidation of the crystal structures of several glycosylases in complex with their respective substrates, substrate analogues and products. The biological importance of individual BER pathways is also being appreciated through the inactivation of key BER genes in knockout mouse models.     

Recent advances in the structural mechanisms of DNA glycosylases

DNA glycosylases safeguard the genome by locating and excising a diverse array of aberrant nucleobases created from oxidation, alkylation, and deamination of DNA. Since the discovery 28 years ago that these enzymes employ a base flipping mechanism to trap their substrates, six different protein architectures have been identified to perform the same basic task. Work over the past several years has unraveled details for how the various DNA glycosylases survey DNA, detect damage within the duplex, select for the correct modification, and catalyze base excision. Here, we provide a broad overview of these latest advances in glycosylase mechanisms gleaned from structural enzymology, highlighting features common to all glycosylases as well as key differences that define their particular substrate specificities.     

Selective base excision repair of DNA damage by the non‐base‐flipping DNA glycosylase AlkC

DNA glycosylases preserve genome integrity and define the specificity of the base excision repair pathway for discreet, detrimental modifications, and thus, the mechanisms by which glycosylases locate DNA damage are of particular interest. Bacterial AlkC and AlkD are specific for cationic alkylated nucleobases and have a distinctive HEAT‐like repeat (HLR) fold. AlkD uses a unique non‐base‐flipping mechanism that enables excision of bulky lesions more commonly associated with nucleotide excision repair. In contrast, AlkC has a much narrower specificity for small lesions, principally N3‐methyladenine (3mA). Here, we describe how AlkC selects for and excises 3mA using a non‐base‐flipping strategy distinct from that of AlkD. A crystal structure resembling a catalytic intermediate complex shows how AlkC uses unique HLR and immunoglobulin‐like domains to induce a sharp kink in the DNA, exposing the damaged nucleobase to active site residues that project into the DNA. This active site can accommodate and excise N3‐methylcytosine (3mC) and N1‐methyladenine (1mA), which are also repaired by AlkB‐catalyzed oxidative demethylation, providing a potential alternative mechanism for repair of these lesions in bacteria.     

Repair of oxidative DNA damage

Cellular genomes suffer extensive damage from exogenous agents and reactive oxygen species formed during normal metabolism. The MutT homologs (MutT/MTH) remove oxidized nucleotide precursors so that they cannot be incorporated into DNA during replication. Among many repair pathways, the base excision repair (BER) pathway is the most important cellular protection mechanism responding to oxidative DNA damage. The 8-oxoG glycosylases (Fpg or MutM/OGG) and the MutY homologs (MutY/MYH) glycosylases along with MutT/MTH protect cells from the mutagenic effects of 8-oxoG, the most stable and deleterious product known caused by oxidative damage to DNA. The key enzymes in the BER process are DNA glycosylases, which remove different damaged bases by cleavage of the N-glycosylic bonds between the bases and the deoxyribose moieties of the nucleotide residues. Biochemical and structural studies have demonstrated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of strated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of several glycosylases show that the substrate base flips out of the sharply bent DNA helix and the minor groove is widened to be accessed by the glycosylases. To complete the repair after glycosylase action, the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site is further processed by an incision step, DNA synthesis, an excision step, and DNA ligation through two alternative pathways. The short-patch BER (1-nucleotide patch size) and long-patch BER (2–6-nucleotide patch size) pathways need AP endonuclease to generate a 3′ hydroxyl group but require different sets of enzymes for DNA synthesis and ligation. Protein-protein interactions have been reported among the enzymes involved in BER. It is possible that the successive players in the repair pathway are assembled in a complex to perform concerted actions. The BER pathways are proposed to protect cells and organisms from mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

Novel substrates of Escherichia coli nth protein and its kinetics for excision of modified bases from DNA damaged by free radicals

Escherichia coli Nth protein (endonuclease III) is a DNA glycosylase with a broad substrate specificity for pyrimidine derivatives. We discovered novel substrates of E. coli Nth protein using gas chromatography/isotope-dilution mass spectrometry and DNA samples, which were damaged by gamma-irradiation or by H(2)O(2)/Fe(III)-EDTA/ascorbic acid. These were 4, 6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine, 5,6-dihydroxyuracil, and 5, 6-dihydroxycytosine. The first compound was recognized for the first time as a purine-derived substrate of the enzyme. We also investigated kinetics of excision of a multitude of modified bases from three damaged DNA substrates. Excision of modified bases was determined as a function of enzyme concentration, incubation time, and substrate concentration. Excision followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Kinetic parameters were determined for the following modified bases: 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine, cis- and trans-thymine glycols, 5-hydroxycytosine, cis- and trans-uracil glycols, 5-hydroxyuracil, 5-hydroxy-5-methylhydantoin, alloxan, 5, 6-dihydroxycytosine, 5,6-dihydroxyuracil, 5-hydroxy-6-hydrothymine, and 5-hydroxy-6-hydrouracil. The results show that three newly discovered substrates were excised by the enzyme with a preference similar to excision of its known major substrates such as thymine glycol and 5-hydroxycytosine. Excision kinetics significantly depended on the nature of the damaged DNA substrates in agreement with previous results on other DNA glycosylases. Specificity constants (k(cat)/K(M)) of E. coli Nth protein were compared to those of its previously investigated functional homologues such as human and Schizosaccharomyces pombe Nth proteins and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ntg1 and Ntg2 proteins. This comparison shows that significant differences exist with respect to substrate specificity and kinetic parameters despite extensive structural conservation among the Nth homologues.     

Excision of 3-methylguanine from alkylated DNA by 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase I of Escherichia coli.

Escherichia coli has two DNA glycosylases for repair of DNA damage caused by simple alkylating agents. The inducible AlkA DNA glycosylase (3-methyladenine [m3A] DNA glycosylase II) removes several different alkylated bases including m3A and 3-methylguanine (m3G) from DNA, whereas the constitutively expressed Tag enzyme (m3A DNA glycosylase I) has appeared to be specific for excision of m3A. In this communication we have reexamined the substrate specificity of Tag by using synthetic DNA rich in GC base pairs to facilitate detection of any possible methyl-G removal. In such DNA alkylated with [3H]dimethyl sulphate, we found that m3G was excised from double-stranded DNA by both glycosylases, although more efficiently by AlkA than by Tag. This was further confirmed using both N-[3H]methyl-N-nitrosourea- and [3H]dimethyl sulphate-treated native DNA, from which Tag excised m3G with an efficiency that was about 70 times lower than for AlkA. These results can explain the previous observation that high levels of Tag expression will suppress the alkylation sensitivity of alkA mutant cells, further implying that m3G is formed in quantity sufficient to represent an important cytotoxic lesion if left unrepaired in cells exposed to alkylating agents.     

Widespread distribution of DNA glycosylases removing oxidative DNA lesions in human and rodent brains

High metabolic activity and low levels of antioxidant enzymes make neurons particularly prone to damage by reactive oxygen species. Thus, repair of oxidative DNA damage is essential for normal brain function. Base excision repair is the major pathway for repair of oxidative DNA damage, and is initiated by DNA glycosylases recognizing and removing the damaged base. In mammalian cells at least five different DNA glycosylases with overlapping substrate specificity, NEIL1, NEIL2, NEIL3, OGG1 and NTH1, remove oxidative DNA base lesions. Here we report mRNA expression and distribution of these five DNA glycosylases in human and rodent brains using in situ hybridization and Northern blotting supported by glycosylase activity assays. NEIL1, NEIL2, OGG1 and NTH1 showed widespread expression at all ages. In situ hybridization studies in mouse brain showed that expression of mNeil1 increased with age. In newborn mouse brain, mNeil3 revealed a discrete expression pattern in brain regions known to harbour stem cell populations, i.e., the subventricular zone, the rostral migratory stream, and the hilar region of the hippocampal formation. Expression of mNeil3 decreased with age, and in old mice brains could be detected only in layer V of neocortex. MNth1 was constitutively expressed during lifespan. In Northern blots, mOgg1 expression showed a transient decrease followed by an increase after 8 weeks of age. Assays for faPy DNA glycosylase activity revealed increased activity level with age in all brain regions analyzed. The widespread but differential expression of the DNA glycosylases recognizing oxidative base lesions suggests distinct and age dependent roles of these enzymes in genome maintenance in brain. The distribution of mNeil3 is particularly intriguing and points to a specific role of this enzyme in stem cell differentiation.     

Arabidopsis thaliana Ogg1 protein excises 8-hydroxyguanine and 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine from oxidatively damaged DNA containing multiple lesions

A functional homologue of eukaryotic Ogg1 proteins in the model plant Arabidopsis thalianahas recently been cloned, isolated, and characterized [Garcia-Ortiz, M. V., Ariza, R. R., and Roldan-Arjona, T. (2001) Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 795-804]. This enzyme (AtOgg1) exhibits a high degree of sequence similarity in several highly conserved regions with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and human Ogg1 proteins. We investigated the substrate specificity and kinetics of AtOgg1 for excision of modified bases from oxidatively damaged DNA that contained multiple pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. Two different DNA substrates prepared by exposure to ionizing radiation in aqueous solution under N2O or air were used for this purpose. Gas chromatography/isotope-dilution mass spectrometry was applied to identify and quantify modified bases in DNA samples. Of the 17 modified bases identified in DNA samples, only 8-hydroxyguanine and 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine were significantly excised from both DNA substrates. This is in agreement with the substrate specificities of other eukaryotic Ogg1 proteins that had previously been studied under identical conditions. Excision depended on incubation time, enzyme concentration, and substrate concentration and followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. A significant dependence of excision on the nature of DNA substrate was observed in accord with previous studies on other DNA glycosylases. A comparison of excision kinetics pointed to significant differences between AtOgg1 and other Ogg1 proteins. We also investigated the effect of base-pairing on the excision using double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides that contained 8-OH-Gua paired with each of the four DNA bases. The activity of AtOgg1 was most effective on the 8-OH-Gua:C pair with some or very low activity on other pairs in agreement with the activity of other Ogg1 proteins. The results unequivocally show that AtOgg1 possesses common substrates with other eukaryotic Ogg1 proteins albeit significant differences between their excision kinetics.