Meiotic segregation of compound-3 chromosomes in Drosophila

Analysis of crossos between genetically marked stocks of Drosophila melanogaster showed, that the compound-3 chromosomes C(3L)RM and C(3R)RM segregate preterentially in female meiosis, and the following two types of eggs are formed predominantly: C(3L)RM; 0 and 0; C(3R)RM. In male meiosis segregation is almost random and four types of sperm are formed: 1. C(3L)RM; C(3R)RM, 2. 0; 0, 3. C(3L)RM; 0, 4. 0; C(3R)RM. The frequencies of these sperm types vary with the genotypes tested. In the stock C(3L)RM, st; C(3R)RM, p ^p, males produce 76.8% type 1 and 2, and 23.2% type 3 and 4; males of the stock C(3L)RM, ri; C(3R)RM, sr form 63.2% type 1 and 2, and 36.8% type 3 and 4.The segregational behaviour of compound-3 chromosomes found in female meiosis is expected according to the distributive pairing hypothesis. In the male however, where there is no distributive pairing, the stock-specific segregation of compound-3 chromosomes may be due to the presence of small homologous chromosome segments near the centromere which influence chromosome distribution.     

Orientation Disruptor (ord): A Recombination-Defective and Disjunction-Defective Meiotic Mutant in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The effects of a semidominant autosomal meiotic mutant, orientation disruptor (symbol: ord), located at 2–103.5 on the genetic map and in region 59B-D of the salivary map, have been examined genetically and cytologically. The results are as follows. (1) Crossing over in homozygous females is reduced to about seven percent of controls on all chromosomes, with the reduction greatest in distal regions. (2) Crossing over on different chromosomes is independent. (3) Reductional nondisjunction of any given chromosome is increased to about thirty percent of gametes from homozygous females. The probability of such nondisjunction is the same among exchange and nonexchange tetrads with the exception that a very proximal exchange tends to regularize segregation. (4) Equational nondisjunction of each chromosome is increased to about ten percent of gametes in homozygous females; this nondisjunction is independent of exchange. (5) The distributive pairing system is operative in homozygous females. (6) In homozygous males, reductional nondisjunction of each chromosome is increased to about ten percent, and equational nondisjunction to about twenty percent, of all gametes. (7) Cytologically, two distinct meiotic divisions occur in spermatocytes of homozygous males. The first division looks normal although occasional univalents are present at prophase I and a few lagging chromosomes are seen at anaphase I. However, sister chromatids of most chromosomes have precociously separated by metaphase II. Possible functions of the ord⁺ gene are considered.     

Genetic Dissection of Segregation Distortion II. Mechanism of Suppression of Distortion by Certain Inversions

In(2L+2R)Cy and In(2LR)Pm² are inversion-bearing chromosomes, the former carrying a paracentric inversion in each arm and the latter carrying a long pericentric. Both chromosomes produce normal segregation ratios when present in heterozygous males with certain segregation distorter chromosomes. The apparent suppression of distortion by these chromosomes was long attributed to a failure of synapsis, but this hypothesis has fallen out of favor recently because a large number of chromosome aberrations, particularly translocations and inversions, suppress distortion even though their breakpoints fall into no recognizable pattern. Although failure of synapsis does not appear to be the mechanism of suppression of distortion, what is responsible for the suppression remains unknown. In this paper it is shown that In(2L+2R)Cy and In(2LR)Pm² suppress segregation distortion because they carry Rsp, a component of the segregation distorter system that renders a chromosome insensitive to distortion. Both chromosomes induce "suicide" of chromosomes carrying Sd Rsp⁺.     

Gametic Frequency of Second Chromosomes of the T-007 Type in a Natural Population of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER in Texas

The T-007 second chromosome, which was isolated from a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster in south Texas in 1970, is known to show, when made heterozygous in males with a standard cn bw second chromosome, a transmission frequency (k) of 0.35—much lower than the theoretically expected 0.5. Natural populations of this species in Texas contain second chromosomes that, against the standard cn bw genetic background, are associated with distorted transmission frequencies comparable to that of the T-007 chromosome. In order to explain how such chromosomes can persist in natural populations in nontrivial frequencies, it has been postulated that, although such chromosomes show reduced k values when tested under the genetic background of a laboratory stock such as cn bw, they may show, on the average, k values larger than 0.5 under natural genetic backgrounds. If this were true, the frequency of chromosomes of the T-007 type (T chromosomes) should be higher in male than in female gametes under natural genetic backgrounds. The present study was conducted to examine this possibility. The results clearly showed that the frequency of such chromosomes was much higher among male than among female gametes, and that the transmission frequency of this type of chromosome was higher than 0.5 under natural genetic backgrounds. These results suggest that T chromosomes behave like Segregation Distorter (SD) chromosomes in natural populations of this species in Texas. A possible relationship between T-007 and SD chromosomes is suggested.     

The Influence of Chromosome Content on the Size and Shape of Sperm Heads in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER and the Demonstration of Chromosome Loss during Spermiogenesis

The volumes of sperm heads were estimated from three-dimensional reconstructions of serially sectioned bundles of nearly mature spermatid nuclei. Cysts from males in which all sperm are expected to have comparable amounts of chromatin (X/Y and In(3LR)/+) show unimodal frequency distributions of nuclear volumes, whereas cysts from males in which meiotic segregation is expected to deliver unequal amounts of chromatin material to spermatid nuclei show two (XY/O and XY/Y) or more (T(2;3)/⁺ and C(2L);C(2R)) modes. The mean volumes of the subpopulations in these cases are related in the same proportions as the metaphase lengths of their chromosomal complements. Thus the volumes of sperm nuclei are proportional to their DNA content. Sperm head shape, on the other hand, does not appear to be very sensitive to chromosomal constitution, as heads of different size do not vary greatly in shape.—The numbers of sperm heads in the various size classes in a cyst depart from mendelian expectations; these departures are caused by the elimination, during individualization, of chromosomes contained within micronuclei that are formed in spermatids at the end of the second meiotic division. The effect of this chromosome loss is to increase the proportion of nullosomic gametes in the sperm pool.—The relative frequencies of XY-bearing and nullo-X, nullo-Y sperm in XY/O males were estimated from the volume measurements. Taking this estimate as a measure of the fertilizing population, it is possible to infer from the change in sex ratio over time following insemination, that XY-bearing sperm have an advantage of 1.5 over nullo-X, nullo-Y sperm in leaving the seminal receptacle of the female for fertilization of ova.     

The Waxy Locus in Maize III. Effect of Structural Heterozygosity on Intragenic Recombination and Flanking Marker Assortment

The effect of heterozygosity for structural rearrangements on recombination between two wx heteroalleles (C and 90) and the pattern of flanking markers in the resultant Wx gametes has been examined. The rearrangements are Tp9, an insertional translocation in which a segment of chromosome 3 has been inserted into the short arm of chromosome 9 close to the wx locus; In9a, a long pericentric inversion with wx in the inverted segment; and Rearr 9, a complex rearrangement of chromosome 9. Heterozygosity for rearrangements decreases the frequency of Wx gametes to varying degrees.—Heterozygosity for Tp9 enhances the proportion of Wx gametes that are apparent convertants and allows the conclusion that such gametes do not normally arise from an exchange in the wx locus plus a second exchange distal to wx. Heterozygosity for In9a markedly decreases the frequency of Wx gametes that are recombinant for outside markers but does not decrease the frequency of convertants.—Heterozygosity for Rearr 9 permits a low frequency of Wx gametes, all of which are apparent convertants.—A high proportion of the convertants have the flanking markers that entered the cross with C so recombination is polarized in normal homologs and in heterozygotes for all rearrangements.     

Primary trisomics of rice: origin, morphology, cytology and use in linkage mapping

Twelve primary trisomics of Oryza sativa L. were isolated from the progenies of spontaneous triploids and were transferred by backcrossing to the genetic background of IR36, a widely grown high yielding rice variety. Eleven trisomics can be identified morphologically from one another and from diploids. However, triplo 11 is difficult to distinguish from diploid sibs.—The extra chromosome of each trisomic was identified cytologically at pachytene stage of meiosis, and the chromosomes were numbered according to their length at this stage. The major distinguishing features of each pachytene chromosome were redescribed.—The female transmission rates varied from 15.5% for triplo 1, the longest chromosome, to 43.9% for triplo 12, the shortest chromosome. Seven of the 12 primary trisomics transmitted the extra chromosome through the male. The low level of chromosomal imbalance tolerated by rice and other evidence are interpreted to indicate that this species is a basic diploid.—Genetic segregation for 22 marker genes in the trisomic progenies was studied. Of a possible 264 combinations, involving 22 genes and 12 trisomics, 120 were examined. Marker genes for each of the 12 chromosomes were identified. The results helped establish associations between linkage groups and cytologically identifiable chromosomes of rice for the first time. Relationships between various systems of numbering chromosomes, trisomics, linkage groups and marker genes are described, and a revised linkage map of rice is presented.     

A screen for recessive speciation genes expressed in the gametes of F1 hybrid yeast

Diploid hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its closest relative, Saccharomyces paradoxus, are viable, but the sexual gametes they produce are not. One of several possible causes of this gamete inviability is incompatibility between genes from different species—such incompatible genes are usually called “speciation genes.” In diploid F1 hybrids, which contain a complete haploid genome from each species, the presence of compatible alleles can mask the effects of (recessive) incompatible speciation genes. But in the haploid gametes produced by F1 hybrids, recessive speciation genes may be exposed, killing the gametes and thus preventing F1 hybrids from reproducing sexually. Here I present the results of an experiment to detect incompatibilities that kill hybrid gametes. I transferred nine of the 16 S. paradoxus chromosomes individually into S. cerevisiae gametes and tested the ability of each to replace its S. cerevisiae homeolog. All nine chromosomes were compatible, producing nine viable haploid strains, each with 15 S. cerevisiae chromosomes and one S. paradoxus chromosome. Thus, none of these chromosomes contain speciation genes that were capable of killing the hybrid gametes that received them. This is a surprising result that suggests that such speciation genes do not play a major role in yeast speciation.     

A Neo-Sex Chromosome That Drives Postzygotic Sex Determination in the Hessian Fly (Mayetiola destructor)

Two nonoverlapping autosomal inversions defined unusual neo-sex chromosomes in the Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor). Like other neo-sex chromosomes, these were normally heterozygous, present only in one sex, and suppressed recombination around a sex-determining master switch. Their unusual properties originated from the anomalous Hessian fly sex determination system in which postzygotic chromosome elimination is used to establish the sex-determining karyotypes. This system permitted the evolution of a master switch (Chromosome maintenance, Cm) that acts maternally. All of the offspring of females that carry Cm-associated neo-sex chromosomes attain a female-determining somatic karyotype and develop as females. Thus, the chromosomes act as maternal effect neo-W''s, or W-prime (W′) chromosomes, where ZW′ females mate with ZZ males to engender female-producing (ZW′) and male-producing (ZZ) females in equal numbers. Genetic mapping and physical mapping identified the inversions. Their distribution was determined in nine populations. Experimental matings established the association of the inversions with Cm and measured their recombination suppression. The inversions are the functional equivalent of the sciarid X-prime chromosomes. We speculate that W′ chromosomes exist in a variety of species that produce unisexual broods.SEX chromosomes are usually classified as X, Y, Z, or W on the basis of their pattern of segregation and the gender of the heterogametic sex (Ohno 1967). However, when chromosome-based sex determination occurs postzygotically, the same nomenclature confounds important distinctions and may hide interesting evolutionary phenomena. The Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor), a gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and an important insect pest of wheat, presents an excellent example (Stuart and Hatchett 1988, 1991). In this insect, all of the female gametes and all of the male gametes have the same number of X chromosomes (Figure 1A); no heterogametic sex exists. Nevertheless, Hessian fly sex determination is chromosome based; postzygotic chromosome elimination produces different X chromosome to autosome ratios in somatic cells (male A1A2X1X2/A1A2OO and female A1A2X1X2/A1A2X1X2, where A1 and A2 are the autosomes, X1 and X2 are the X chromosomes, and the paternally derived chromosomes follow the slash) (Stuart and Hatchett 1991; Marin and Baker 1998). Thus, Hessian fly “X” chromosomes are defined by their haploid condition in males, rather than by their segregation in the gametes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.—Chromosome behavior and sex determination in the Hessian fly. (A) Syngamy (1) establishes the germ-line chromosome constitution: ∼32 maternally derived E chromosomes (represented as a single white chromosome) and both maternally derived (black) and paternally derived (gray) autosomes and X chromosomes. During embryogenesis, while the E chromosomes are eliminated, the paternally derived X chromosomes are either retained (2) or excluded (3) from the presumptive somatic cells. When the paternally derived X chromosomes are retained (2), a female-determining karyotype is established. When they are eliminated (3), a male-determining karyotype is established. Thelygenic mothers carry Cm (white arrow), which conditions all of their offspring to retain the X chromosomes. Recombination occurs during oogenesis (4). All ova contain a full complement of E chromosomes and a haploid complement of autosomes and X chromosomes. Chromosome elimination occurs during spermatogenesis (5). Sperm contain only the maternally derived autosomes and X chromosomes. (B) The segregation of Cm (white dot) on a Hessian fly autosome among monogenic families. Thelygenic females produce broods composed of equal numbers of thelygenic (Cm/−) and arrhenogenic (−/−) females (box 1). Arrhenogenic females produce males (box 2). (C) Matings between monogenic and amphigenic families. Cm (white dot) is dominant to the amphigenic-derived chromosomes (gray dot) and generates all-female offspring (box 3). Amphigenic-derived chromosomes are dominant to the arrhenogenic-derived chromosomes (no dot) and generate offspring of both sexes (box 4).An autosomal, dominant, genetic factor called Chromosome maintenance (Cm) complicates Hessian fly sex determination further (Stuart and Hatchett 1991). Cm has a maternal effect that acts upstream of X chromosome elimination during embryogenesis (Figure 1A). It prevents X chromosome elimination so that all of the offspring of Cm-bearing mothers obtain a female-determining karyotype. Cm-bearing females produce only female offspring and are therefore thelygenic. The absence of Cm usually has the opposite effect; all of the offspring of most Cm-lacking females obtain a male-determining karyotype. These Cm-lacking females produce only male offspring and are therefore arrhenogenic. Like a sex-determining master switch, Cm is usually heterozygous and present in only one sex (Figure 1B). Thus, thelygenic females (Cm/−) are “heterogametic,” as their Cm-containing gametes and Cm-lacking gametes produce thelygenic (Cm/−) and arrhenogenic (−/−) females in a 1:1 ratio. Collectively, thelygenic and arrhenogenic females are called monogenic because they produce unisexual families. However, some Hessian fly females produce broods of both sexes and are called amphigenic. No mating barrier between monogenic and amphigenic families exists (Figure 1C), but amphigenic females have always been found in lower abundance (Painter 1930; Gallun et al. 1961; Stuart and Hatchett 1991). In experimental matings, the inheritance of maternal phenotype was consistent with the segregation of three Cm alleles (Figure 1C): a dominant thelygenic allele, a hypomorphic amphigenic allele, and a null arrhenogenic allele (Stuart and Hatchett 1991).Here we report the genetic and physical mapping of Cm on Hessian fly autosome 1 (A1). Two nonoverlapping inversions were identified that segregated perfectly with Cm. The most distal inversion was present in all thelygenic females examined. The more proximal inversion extended recombination suppression. These observations suggested that successive inversions evolved to suppress recombination around Cm after it arose. The inversions therefore appear to have evolved in response to the forces that shaped vertebrate Y and W chromosomes (Charlesworth 1996; Graves and Shetty 2001; Rice and Chippindale 2001; Carvalho and Clark 2005). We therefore believe the inversion-bearing chromosomes may be classified as maternal effect neo-W''s.     

Crossover Heterogeneity in the Absence of Hotspots in Caenorhabditis elegans

Crossovers play mechanical roles in meiotic chromosome segregation, generate genetic diversity by producing new allelic combinations, and facilitate evolution by decoupling linked alleles. In almost every species studied to date, crossover distributions are dramatically nonuniform, differing among sexes and across genomes, with spatial variation in crossover rates on scales from whole chromosomes to subkilobase hotspots. To understand the regulatory forces dictating these heterogeneous distributions a crucial first step is the fine-scale characterization of crossover distributions. Here we define the wild-type distribution of crossovers along a region of the C. elegans chromosome II at unprecedented resolution, using recombinant chromosomes of 243 hermaphrodites and 226 males. We find that well-characterized large-scale domains, with little fine-scale rate heterogeneity, dominate this region’s crossover landscape. Using the Gini coefficient as a summary statistic, we find that this region of the C. elegans genome has the least heterogeneous fine-scale crossover distribution yet observed among model organisms, and we show by simulation that the data are incompatible with a mammalian-type hotspot-rich landscape. The large-scale structural domains—the low-recombination center and the high-recombination arm—have a discrete boundary that we localize to a small region. This boundary coincides with the arm-center boundary defined both by nuclear-envelope attachment of DNA in somatic cells and GC content, consistent with proposals that these features of chromosome organization may be mechanical causes and evolutionary consequences of crossover recombination.     

Condensin II resolves chromosomal associations to enable anaphase I segregation in Drosophila male meiosis

Several meiotic processes ensure faithful chromosome segregation to create haploid gametes. Errors to any one of these processes can lead to zygotic aneuploidy with the potential for developmental abnormalities. During prophase I of Drosophila male meiosis, each bivalent condenses and becomes sequestered into discrete chromosome territories. Here, we demonstrate that two predicted condensin II subunits, Cap-H2 and Cap-D3, are required to promote territory formation. In mutants of either subunit, territory formation fails and chromatin is dispersed throughout the nucleus. Anaphase I is also abnormal in Cap-H2 mutants as chromatin bridges are found between segregating heterologous and homologous chromosomes. Aneuploid sperm may be generated from these defects as they occur at an elevated frequency and are genotypically consistent with anaphase I segregation defects. We propose that condensin II–mediated prophase I territory formation prevents and/or resolves heterologous chromosomal associations to alleviate their potential interference in anaphase I segregation. Furthermore, condensin II–catalyzed prophase I chromosome condensation may be necessary to resolve associations between paired homologous chromosomes of each bivalent. These persistent chromosome associations likely consist of DNA entanglements, but may be more specific as anaphase I bridging was rescued by mutations in the homolog conjunction factor teflon. We propose that the consequence of condensin II mutations is a failure to resolve heterologous and homologous associations mediated by entangled DNA and/or homolog conjunction factors. Furthermore, persistence of homologous and heterologous interchromosomal associations lead to anaphase I chromatin bridging and the generation of aneuploid gametes.     

Meiotic Behavior of Compound Autosomes in Females of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: Interchromosomal Effects and the Source of Spontaneous Nonsegregation

In females of Drosophila melanogaster, compound autosomes enter the repulsion phase of meiosis uncommitted to a particular segregation pattern because their centromeres are not restricted to a bivalent pairing complex as a consequence of crossing over. Their distribution at anaphase, therefore, is determined by some meiotic property other than exchange pairing, a property that for many years has been associated with the concept of nonhomologous pairing. In the absence of heterologous rearrangements or a free Y chromosome, C(3L) and C(3R) are usually recovered in separate gametes, that is as products of meiotic segregation. Nevertheless, there is a regular, albeit infrequent, recovery of reciprocal meiotic products (the nonsegregational products) that are disomic and nullosomic for compound thirds. The frequency of these exceptions, which is normally between 0.5 and 5.0%, differs for the various strains examined, but remains constant for any given strain. Since previous studies have not uncovered a cause for this base level of nonsegregation, it has been referred to as the spontaneous frequency. In this study, crosses between males and females whose X chromosomes, as well as compound autosomes, are differentially marked reveal a highly significant positive correlation between the frequency of compound-autosome nonsegregation and the frequency of X-chromosome nondisjunction. However, an inverse correlation is found when the frequency of nondisjunction is related to the frequency of crossing over in the proximal region of the X chromosome. These findings have been examined with reference to the distributive pairing and the chromocentral models and interpreted as demonstrating (1) that nonsegregational meiotic events arise primarily as a result of nonhomologous interactions, (2) that forces responsible for the segregation of nonhomologous chromosomes are properties of the chromocentral region, and (3) that these forces come into expression after the exchange processes are complete.     

Male-Specific Lethal Mutations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

A total of 7,416 ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-treated second chromosomes and 6,212 EMS-treated third chromosomes were screened for sex-specific lethals. Four new recessive male-specific lethal mutations were recovered. When in homozygous condition, each of these mutations kills males during the late larval or early pupal stages, but has no detectable effect in females. One mutant, mle^ts, is a temperature sensitive allele of maleless, mle (Fukunaga, Tanaka and Oishi 1975), while the other three mutants identify two new loci: male-specific lethal-1 (msl-1) (two alleles) at map position 2-53.3 and male-specific lethal-2 (msl-2) at 2-9.0.——The male-specific lethality associated with these mutants is not related to the sex per se of the mutant flies, since sex-transforming genes fail to interact with these mutations. Moreover, the presence or absence of a Y chromosome in males or females has no influence on the male-specific lethal action of these mutations. Finally, no single region of the X chromosome, when present as a duplication, is sufficient to rescue males from the lethal effects of msl-1 or msl-2. These results suggest that the number of complete X chromosomes determines whether a fly homozygous for a male-specific lethal mutation lives or dies.     

Caenorhabditis elegans HIM-18/SLX-4 Interacts with SLX-1 and XPF-1 and Maintains Genomic Integrity in the Germline by Processing Recombination Intermediates

Homologous recombination (HR) is essential for the repair of blocked or collapsed replication forks and for the production of crossovers between homologs that promote accurate meiotic chromosome segregation. Here, we identify HIM-18, an ortholog of MUS312/Slx4, as a critical player required in vivo for processing late HR intermediates in Caenorhabditis elegans. DNA damage sensitivity and an accumulation of HR intermediates (RAD-51 foci) during premeiotic entry suggest that HIM-18 is required for HR–mediated repair at stalled replication forks. A reduction in crossover recombination frequencies—accompanied by an increase in HR intermediates during meiosis, germ cell apoptosis, unstable bivalent attachments, and subsequent chromosome nondisjunction—support a role for HIM-18 in converting HR intermediates into crossover products. Such a role is suggested by physical interaction of HIM-18 with the nucleases SLX-1 and XPF-1 and by the synthetic lethality of him-18 with him-6, the C. elegans BLM homolog. We propose that HIM-18 facilitates processing of HR intermediates resulting from replication fork collapse and programmed meiotic DSBs in the C. elegans germline.     

Association of Isozymes with a Reciprocal Translocation in Cultivated Rye (SECALE CEREALE L.)

In rye (Secale cereale L. cv. "Ailés") the progeny of a cross between a structural heterozygote for a reciprocal translocation (involving the 1R chromosome) and a homozygote for the standard chromosome arrangement were analyzed for the electrophoretic patterns of eight different leaf isozymes and also for their meiotic configuration at metaphase I.——The Got-3 and Mdh-2b loci are linked to each other and also to the reciprocal translocation. The Mdh-2b locus is located in the interstitial segment of the 3Rq chromosome arm, with an estimated distance of 8 cM to the breakpoint. Therefore, the reciprocal translocation involves the 1R and 3R chromosomes.——Also, the Mdh-1 and 6-Pgd-2 loci are linked (16 ± 3 cM) and have been located on the 2Rq arm. Finally, the Per-3 and Per-4 loci are located on the 2Rp chromosome arm at an estimated distance of 26 ± 4 cM.     

CHL1 is a nuclear protein with an essential ATP binding site that exhibits a size-dependent effect on chromosome segregation

Saccharomyces cerevisiae chl1 mutants have a significant increase in the rate of chromosome missegregation. CHL1 encodes a 99 kDa predicted protein with an ATP binding site consensus, a putative helix–turn–helix DNA binding motif, and homology to helicases. Using site-directed mutagenesis, I show that mutations that are predicted to abolish ATP binding in CHL1 inactivate its function in chromosome segregation. Furthermore, overexpression of these mutations interferes with chromosome transmission of a 125 kb chromosome fragment in a wild-type strain. Polyclonal antibodies against CHL1 show that CHL1 is predominantly in the nuclear fraction of S.cerevisiae. CHL1 function is more critical for the segregation of small chromosomes. In chl1Δ1/chl1Δ1 mutants, artificial circular or linear chromosomes <150 kb in size exhibit near random segregation (0.12 per cell division), whereas all chromosomes tested >225 kb were lost at rates (5 × 10^–3 per cell division) comparable to that observed for endogenous chromosome III. These results reveal an important role for ATPases/DNA helicases in chromosome segregation. Such enzymes may alter DNA topology to allow loading of proteins involved in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion.     

Normal Segregation of a Foreign-Species Chromosome During Drosophila Female Meiosis Despite Extensive Heterochromatin Divergence

The abundance and composition of heterochromatin changes rapidly between species and contributes to hybrid incompatibility and reproductive isolation. Heterochromatin differences may also destabilize chromosome segregation and cause meiotic drive, the non-Mendelian segregation of homologous chromosomes. Here we use a range of genetic and cytological assays to examine the meiotic properties of a Drosophila simulans chromosome 4 (sim-IV) introgressed into D. melanogaster. These two species differ by ∼12–13% at synonymous sites and several genes essential for chromosome segregation have experienced recurrent adaptive evolution since their divergence. Furthermore, their chromosome 4s are visibly different due to heterochromatin divergence, including in the AATAT pericentromeric satellite DNA. We find a visible imbalance in the positioning of the two chromosome 4s in sim-IV/mel-IV heterozygote and also replicate this finding with a D. melanogaster 4 containing a heterochromatic deletion. These results demonstrate that heterochromatin abundance can have a visible effect on chromosome positioning during meiosis. Despite this effect, however, we find that sim-IV segregates normally in both diplo and triplo 4 D. melanogaster females and does not experience elevated nondisjunction. We conclude that segregation abnormalities and a high level of meiotic drive are not inevitable byproducts of extensive heterochromatin divergence. Animal chromosomes typically contain large amounts of noncoding repetitive DNA that nevertheless varies widely between species. This variation may potentially induce non-Mendelian transmission of chromosomes. We have examined the meiotic properties and transmission of a highly diverged chromosome 4 from a foreign species within the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster. This chromosome has substantially less of a simple sequence repeat than does D. melanogaster 4, and we find that this difference results in altered positioning when chromosomes align during meiosis. Yet this foreign chromosome segregates at normal frequencies, demonstrating that chromosome segregation can be robust to major differences in repetitive DNA abundance.     

The Kinetochore

A critical requirement for mitosis is the distribution of genetic material to the two daughter cells. The central player in this process is the macromolecular kinetochore structure, which binds to both chromosomal DNA and spindle microtubule polymers to direct chromosome alignment and segregation. This review will discuss the key kinetochore activities required for mitotic chromosome segregation, including the recognition of a specific site on each chromosome, kinetochore assembly and the formation of kinetochore–microtubule connections, the generation of force to drive chromosome segregation, and the regulation of kinetochore function to ensure that chromosome segregation occurs with high fidelity.A key objective for cell division is to physically distribute the genomic material to the two new daughter cells. Achieving proper chromosome segregation requires three primary things (Fig. 1): (1) the ability to specifically recognize and detect each unit of DNA; (2) a physical connection between the DNA and other cellular structures to mediate their distribution; and (3) a force-generating mechanism to drive the spatial movement of the DNA to the daughter cells. Although this article focuses on how these processes are achieved during mitosis in eukaryotic cells, these key principles are required for DNA segregation in all organisms, including bacteria. Perhaps the simplest DNA distribution machine is the partitioning system that segregates the small, circular bacterial R1 plasmid (Fig. 1). The R1 partitioning system uses just a single component for each of the three key activities listed above (reviewed in Salje et al. 2010). First, a 160-bp sequence-specific DNA element termed parC allows the partitioning system to recognize a specific region of the plasmid. Second, the DNA-binding protein ParR associates with the parC DNA sequence. ParR can then mediate connections between the plasmid DNA and third factor—the filament forming protein ParM. ParM polymerization is capable of generating force to drive the separation of two replicated copies of the R1 plasmid. The R1 plasmid partitioning system is both simple and elegant, and it demonstrates that it is possible to achieve DNA segregation with only two proteins and a short DNA sequence.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Core requirements for DNA segregation. Cartoon diagram showing the core activities required for DNA segregation of the bacterial R1 plasmid or eukaryotic chromosomes highlighting the recognition of DNA, physical connections, and force.In striking contrast to the R1 plasmid partitioning system, chromosome segregation in eukaryotes (Fig. 1) requires hundreds of different proteins. Given the ability of the simple R1 partitioning system to efficiently mediate DNA segregation in bacteria, it raises the question of why this added complexity is present in eukaryotes. Importantly, there are significant limitations to the bacterial system that would prevent such a system from working in eukaryotes. For example, bacteria are ∼1–2-µm long, whereas vertebrate cells can be ∼10–50 µm in diameter creating a larger spatial requirement to move the DNA (Fig. 1). In addition, although only a single R1 plasmid is present in each bacterium, human cells have 46 different units of DNA (23 from each parent), which are packaged into chromosomes. Each chromosome must be distributed properly during every cell division. Independently recognizing each of these units to ensure their accurate distribution represents a complex challenge. Indeed, adding even one additional R1 plasmid causes the system to break down, with ParM polymers acting indefinitely, pushing the two most closely positioned units of DNA apart to opposite ends of a cell (Campbell and Mullins 2007). Finally, eukaryotic cells require that chromosome segregation occur with high fidelity to ensure that the two replicated units of DNA are distributed accurately to the two new daughter cells. Even a single chromosome mis-segregation event in a multicellular organism has the potential to lead to lethality, lead to developmental disorders, or contribute to cancer progression (Holland and Cleveland 2009; Gordon et al. 2012), placing a high premium on the accuracy of this process.Despite the differences in complexity between bacterial plasmid partitioning systems and the eukaryotic chromosome segregation machinery, the fundamental requirements for distributing DNA to two new cells are remarkably similar (Fig. 1). First, it is necessary to have a region of each chromosome that is “recognized” by the chromosome segregation machinery. In eukaryotes, this region of DNA is termed the centromere. Second, a group of proteins must assemble on this DNA element to facilitate its “connections” to other structures in the cell. In eukaryotes, this physical connection is provided by a macromolecular structure termed the kinetochore. The kinetochore is an impressive molecular machine that requires the coordinated functions of more than 100 different protein components (Cheeseman and Desai 2008). Third, the kinetochore must interact with additional structures that provide the “force” to move the chromosomes. Chromosome segregation in eukaryotes requires microtubule polymers that generate force primarily through their depolymerization.In this review, I will discuss the molecular mechanisms that underlie kinetochore function, including the recognition of a specific site on each chromosome, the formation of the physical kinetochore–microtubule connections, and the forces that drive chromosome segregation during mitosis in eukaryotes, as well as the mechanisms that regulate kinetochore function.     

Preferential elimination of chromosome 5R of rye in the progeny of 5R5D dimonosomics

Transmission of chromosome 5R of rye (Secale cereale L.) and chromosome 5D of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through gametes of 5R5D dimonosomics (2n = 42, 20W″ + 5R′ + 5D′) was studied. Chromosome 5R was found to have lower competitiveness as compared to 5D. Gametes with the rye chromosome were two times less often involved in the formation of a progeny. The combined frequency of the karyotypes of wheat (5D5D) and wheat monosomics (5D) was 11.6-fold higher than the frequency of the karyotypes of substitution lines (5R5R) and monosomics for the rye chromosome (5R). The karyotypes of 10.38% of hybrid plants had aberrant 5R chromosomes with different translocations formed as a result of breakages in the centromere and in the proximal region of the long arm. Telocentrics for the short arm t5RS, i5RS isochromosomes, and chromosomes with a terminal deletion T5RS.5RL-del were identified. The absence of amplification of SSR markers mapped on 5RS and the detection of PCR products for a number of 5RL markers (including the genome-specific rye marker Xrms115) permitted nine plants carrying only the long arm of chromosome 5R to be revealed. Since t5RL telocentrics were not detected by the cytological analysis, the results obtained allow us to suggest the presence of small intercalary translocations of the long arm of chromosome 5R in chromosome 5D or in other wheat chromosomes.     

Temperature-Dependent Modulation of Chromosome Segregation in msh4 Mutants of Budding Yeast

Background

In many organisms, homologous chromosomes rely upon recombination-mediated linkages, termed crossovers, to promote their accurate segregation at meiosis I. In budding yeast, the evolutionarily conserved mismatch-repair paralogues, Msh4 and Msh5, promote crossover formation in conjunction with several other proteins, collectively termed the Synapsis Initiation Complex (SIC) proteins or ‘ZMM’s (Zip1-Zip2-Zip3-Zip4-Spo16, Msh4-Msh5, Mer3). zmm mutants show decreased levels of crossovers and increased chromosome missegregation, which is thought to cause decreased spore viability.

Principal Findings

In contrast to other ZMM mutants, msh4 and msh5 mutants show improved spore viability and chromosome segregation in response to elevated temperature (23°C versus 33°C). Crossover frequencies in the population of viable spores in msh4 and msh5 mutants are similar at both temperatures, suggesting that temperature-mediated chromosome segregation does not occur by increasing crossover frequencies. Furthermore, meiotic progression defects at elevated temperature do not select for a subpopulation of cells with improved segregation. Instead, another ZMM protein, Zip1, is important for the temperature-dependent improvement in spore viability.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate interactions between genetic (zmm status) and environmental factors in determining chromosome segregation.