Essential role of Mia40 in import and assembly of mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins

Mitochondria import nuclear-encoded precursor proteins to four different subcompartments. Specific import machineries have been identified that direct the precursor proteins to the mitochondrial outer membrane, inner membrane or matrix, respectively. However, a machinery dedicated to the import of mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) proteins has not been found so far. We have identified the essential IMS protein Mia40 (encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae open reading frame YKL195w). Mitochondria with a mutant form of Mia40 are selectively inhibited in the import of several small IMS proteins, including the essential proteins Tim9 and Tim10. The import of proteins to the other mitochondrial subcompartments does not depend on functional Mia40. The binding of small Tim proteins to Mia40 is crucial for their transport across the outer membrane and represents an initial step in their assembly into IMS complexes. We conclude that Mia40 is a central component of the protein import and assembly machinery of the mitochondrial IMS.     

Coupling Chemical Energy by the hsp70/tim44 Complex to Drive Protein Translocation into Mitochondria

A dynamic complex between the mitochondrial cognate of hsp70 (mthsp70) and the inner membrane protein tim44 couples energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to drive multiple steps in the mitochondrial protein import pathway: (1) The dependent import step and the mthsp70/tim44 complex cooperate to facilitate the unidirectional transfer of the mitochondrial targeting signal across the inner membrane. (2) The mthsp70/tim44 complex helps to unfold domains on precursors proteins that arrive at the import apparatus in a folded conformation on the cis side of the outer membrane. (3) Completion of import is then driven by the mthsp70/tim44 complex in a manner that is independent of . Mechanisms proposed to explain how the mthsp70/tim44 complex harvests chemical energy to drive these aspects of the import process are discussed.     

Mitochondrial preprotein translocases as dynamic molecular machines

Proteomic studies have demonstrated that yeast mitochondria contain roughly 1000 different proteins. Only eight of these proteins are encoded by the mitochondrial genome and are synthesized on mitochondrial ribosomes. The remaining 99% of mitochondrial precursors are encoded within the nuclear genome and after their synthesis on cytosolic ribosomes must be imported into the organelle. Targeting of these proteins to mitochondria and their import into one of the four mitochondrial subcompartments--outer membrane, intermembrane space (IMS), inner membrane and matrix--requires various membrane-embedded protein translocases, as well as numerous chaperones and cochaperones in the aqueous compartments. During the last years, several novel protein components involved in the import and assembly of mitochondrial proteins have been identified. The picture that emerges from these exciting new findings is that of highly dynamic import machineries, rather than of regulated, but static protein complexes. In this review, we will give an overview on the recent progress in our understanding of mitochondrial protein import. We will focus on the presequence translocase of the inner mitochondrial membrane, the TIM23 complex and the presequence translocase-associated motor, the PAM complex. These two molecular machineries mediate the multistep import of preproteins with cleavable N-terminal signal sequences into the matrix or inner membrane of mitochondria.     

The First Steps of Protein Import into Mitochondria

Protein import into mitochondria is initiated by the recognition and binding of precursor proteins by import components in the cytosol, on the mitochondrial surface, and in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Following their synthesis on cytoplasmic ribosomes, some precursor proteins interact with molecular chaperones in the cytosol which function in maintaining the precursor protein in an import-competent state and may also aid in the delivery of the precursor to the mitochondria. A multisubunit protein import receptor then recognises and binds precursor proteins before feeding them into the outer membrane import site. Some proteins are sorted from the import site into the outer membrane, but most precursor proteins travel through the outer membrane import site into the mitochondria, where the later steps of protein import take place.     

The regulation of mitochondrial physiology by organelle-associated GTP-binding proteins

Recent studies have shown that GTP-binding proteins can modulate mitochondrial membrane fusion and fission. Furthermore, GTP-binding proteins can regulate the binding of ribosomes to the mitochondrial membrane and may facilitate the import of proteins through contact points between inner and outer mitochondrial membranes. Mitochondrial GTP-binding proteins therefore appear to have the potential to modulate physiological function of the organelle and may also be involved in cellular processes such as cellular transformation. A beginning has been made on the characterization of mitochondrial GTP-binding proteins and the DNA sequence of one protein has become newly available. Future studies are needed to determine whether GTP-binding proteins are interacting with cell signalling molecules such as protein kinases in the mitochondria.     

The mitochondrial intermembrane space: the most constricted mitochondrial sub-compartment with the largest variety of protein import pathways

The mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) is the most constricted sub-mitochondrial compartment, housing only about 5% of the mitochondrial proteome, and yet is endowed with the largest variability of protein import mechanisms. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of the major IMS import pathway based on the oxidative protein folding pathway and discuss the stunning variability of other IMS protein import pathways. As IMS-localized proteins only have to cross the outer mitochondrial membrane, they do not require energy sources like ATP hydrolysis in the mitochondrial matrix or the inner membrane electrochemical potential which are critical for import into the matrix or insertion into the inner membrane. We also explore several atypical IMS import pathways that are still not very well understood and are guided by poorly defined or completely unknown targeting peptides. Importantly, many of the IMS proteins are linked to several human diseases, and it is therefore crucial to understand how they reach their normal site of function in the IMS. In the final part of this review, we discuss current understanding of how such IMS protein underpin a large spectrum of human disorders.     

The presequence pathway is involved in protein sorting to the mitochondrial outer membrane

The mitochondrial outer membrane contains integral α-helical and β-barrel proteins that are imported from the cytosol. The machineries importing β-barrel proteins have been identified, however, different views exist on the import of α-helical proteins. It has been reported that the biogenesis of Om45, the most abundant signal-anchored protein, does not depend on proteinaceous components, but involves direct insertion into the outer membrane. We show that import of Om45 occurs via the translocase of the outer membrane and the presequence translocase of the inner membrane. Assembly of Om45 in the outer membrane involves the MIM machinery. Om45 thus follows a new mitochondrial biogenesis pathway that uses elements of the presequence import pathway to direct a protein to the outer membrane.     

Tic20 and Tic22 Are New Components of the Protein Import Apparatus at the Chloroplast Inner Envelope Membrane

Two components of the chloroplast envelope, Tic20 and Tic22, were previously identified as candidates for components of the general protein import machinery by their ability to covalently cross-link to nuclear-encoded preproteins trapped at an intermediate stage in import across the envelope (Kouranov, A., and D.J. Schnell. 1997. J. Cell Biol. 139:1677–1685). We have determined the primary structures of Tic20 and Tic22 and investigated their localization and association within the chloroplast envelope. Tic20 is a 20-kD integral membrane component of the inner envelope membrane. In contrast, Tic22 is a 22-kD protein that is located in the intermembrane space between the outer and inner envelope membranes and is peripherally associated with the outer face of the inner membrane. Tic20, Tic22, and a third inner membrane import component, Tic110, associate with import components of the outer envelope membrane. Preprotein import intermediates quantitatively associate with this outer/inner membrane supercomplex, providing evidence that the complex corresponds to envelope contact sites that mediate direct transport of preproteins from the cytoplasm to the stromal compartment. On the basis of these results, we propose that Tic20 and Tic22 are core components of the protein translocon of the inner envelope membrane of chloroplasts.     

Is Protein Import into Plastids with Four‐Membrane Envelopes Dependent on Two Toc Systems Operating in Tandem?

Abstract: Plastids with four‐membrane envelopes have evolved by several independent endosymbioses involving a eukaryotic alga as the endosymbiont and a protozoan predator as the host. It is assumed that their outermost membrane is derived from the phagosomal membrane of the host and that protein targeting to and across this membrane proceeds co‐translationally, including ER and the Golgi apparatus (e.g., chlorarachniophytes) or only ER (e.g., heterokonts). Since the two inner membranes (or the plastid envelope) of such a complex plastid are derived from the endosymbiont plastid, they are probably provided with Toc and Tic systems, enabling post‐translational passage of the imported proteins into the stroma. The third envelope membrane, or the periplastid one, originates from the endosymbiont plasmalemma, but what import apparatus operates in it remains enigmatic. Recently, Cavalier‐Smith (1999^[5]) has proposed that the Toc system, pre‐existing in the endosymbiont plastid, has been relocated to the periplastid membrane, and that plastids having four envelope membranes contain two Toc systems operating in tandem and requiring the same targeting sequence, i.e., the transit peptide. Although this model is parsimonious, it encounters several serious obstacles, the most serious one resulting from the complex biogenesis of Toc75 which forms a translocation pore. In contrast to most proteins targeted to the outer membrane of the plastid envelope, this protein carries a complex transit peptide, indicating that a successful integration of the Toc system into the periplastid membrane would have to be accompanied by relocation of the stromal processing peptidase to the endosymbiont cytosol. However, such a relocation would be catastrophic because this enzyme would cleave the transit peptide off all plastid‐destined proteins, thus disabling biogenesis of the plastid compartment. Considering these difficulties, I suggest that in periplastid membranes two Toc‐independent translocation apparatuses have evolved: a porin‐like channel in chlorarachniophytes and cryptophytes, and a vesicular pathway in heterokonts and haptophytes. Since simultaneous evolution of a new transport system in the periplastid membrane and in the phagosomal one would be complicated, it is argued that plastids with four‐membrane envelopes have evolved by replacement of plastids with three‐membrane envelopes. I suggest that during the first round of secondary endosymbioses (resulting in plastids surrounded by three membranes), myzocytotically‐engulfed eukaryotic alga developed a Golgi‐mediated targeting pathway which was added to the Toc/Tic‐based apparatus of the endosymbiont plastid. During the second round of secondary endosymbioses (resulting in plastids surrounded by four membranes), phagocytotically‐engulfed eukaryotic alga exploited the Golgi pathway of the original plastid, and a new translocation system had to originate only in the periplastid membrane, although its emergence probably resulted in modification of the import machinery pre‐existing in the endosymbiont plastid.     

Identification of Signals Required for Import of the Soybean FAd Subunit of ATP Synthase into Mitochondria

The requirements for protein import into mitochondria was investigated by using the targeting signal of the F(A)d subunit of soybean mitochondrial ATP synthase attached to two different passenger proteins, its native passenger and soybean alternative oxidase. Both passenger proteins are soybean mitochondrial proteins. Changing hydrophobic residues at positions -24:25 (Phe:Leu), -18:19 (Ile:Leu) and -12:13 (Leu:Ile) of the 31 amino acid cleavable presequence gave more than 50% inhibition of import with both passenger proteins. Some other residues in the targeting signal played a more significant role in targeting of one passenger protein compared to another. Notably changing positive residues (Arg, Lys) had a greater inhibitory affect on import with the native passenger protein, i.e. greater inhibition of import with F(A)d mature protein was observed compared to when alternative oxidase was the mature protein. When using chimeric passenger proteins it was shown that the nature of the mature protein can greatly affect the targeting properties of the presequence. In vivo investigations of the targeting presequence indicated that the presequence of 31 amino acids could not support import of GFP as a passenger protein. However, fusion of the full-length F(A)d coding sequence to GFP did result in mitochondrial localisation of GFP. Using the latter fusion we confirmed the critical role of hydrophobic residues at positions -24:25 and -18:19. These results support the proposal that core mitochondrial targeting features exist in all presequences, but that additional features exist. These features may not be evident with all passenger proteins.     

Zinc-dependent intermembrane space proteins stimulate import of carrier proteins into plant mitochondria

Mitochondrial inner membrane carrier proteins are imported into mitochondria from yeast, fungi and mammals by specific machinery, some components of which are distinct from those utilized by other proteins. Import of two different carriers into plant mitochondria showed that one contains a cleavable presequence which was processed during import, while the other imported in a valinomycin-sensitive manner without processing. Mild osmotic shock of mitochondria released intermembrane space (IMS) components and impaired carrier protein import. Adding back the released IMS proteins as a concentrate in the presence of micromolar ZnCl2 stimulated carrier import into IMS-depleted mitochondria, but did not stimulate import of a non-carrier control precursor protein, the alternative oxidase. Anion-exchange separation of IMS components before addition to IMS-depleted mitochondria revealed a correlation between several 9-10 kDa proteins and stimulation of carrier import. MS/MS sequencing of these proteins identified them as plant homologues of the yeast zinc-finger carrier import components Tim9 and Tim10. Stimulation of import was dependent on either Zn2+ or Cd2+ and inhibited by both N-ethylmalamide (NEM) and a divalent cation chelator, consistent with a functional requirement for a zinc finger protein. This represents direct functional evidence for a distinct carrier import pathway in plant mitochondria, and provides a tool for determining the potential function of other IMS proteins associated with protein import.     

New Insights into the Protein Import Machinery of the Chloroplast's Outer Envelope

A large number of plastid localized proteins are post-translationally imported as precursor proteins from the cytosol into the organelle. Recognition and translocation is accomplished by a subset of chloroplast envelope proteins, which were identified by different but complementary methods. The o uter e nvelope p roteins OEP 86, OEP 75, OEP 70 (a heat shock cognate 70 homologue) and OEP 34 are clearly involved in the import event and can be isolated as one functionally active translocation unit. For three of these proteins cDNA clones have been very recently obtained, namely OEP 86, OEP 75 and OEP 34. OEP 86 seems to be a precursor protein receptor which could be regulated by GTP binding and ATP-dependent phosphorylation-dephosphorylation. OEP 75 is part of the translocation pore traversing the membrane in multiple β-sheets. OEP 34 is tightly associated with OEP 75. It represents a new type of GTP-binding protein which possesses endogenous GTPase activity. Multiple GTP binding and hydrolysis cycles as well as protein phosphorylation-dephosphorylation events might, therefore, regulate the interaction of a precursor protein with the translocation machinery of the outer envelope, making it very distinct from the mitochondrial outer membrane system. Further proteins of the inner envelope membrane, namely IEP 97 and IEP 36, have been implied to function in the translocation event. These recent data allow not only identification of the players in the game but also speculation about mechanisms and regulation of translocation.     

The surprising complexity of peroxisome biogenesis

Peroxisomes are small organelles with a single boundary membrane. All of their matrix proteins are nuclear-encoded, synthesized on free ribosomes in the cytosol, and post-translationally transported into the organelle. This may sound familiar, but in fact, peroxisome biogenesis is proving to be surprisingly unique. First, there are several classes of plant peroxisomes, each specialized for a different metabolic function and sequestering specific matrix enzymes. Second, although the mechanisms of peroxisomal protein import are conserved between the classes, multiple pathways of protein targeting and translocation have been defined. At least two different types of targeting signals direct proteins to the peroxisome matrix. The most common peroxisomal targeting signal is a tripeptide limited to the carboxyl terminus of the protein. Some peroxisomal proteins possess an amino-terminal signal which may be cleaved after import. Each targeting signal interacts with a different cytosolic receptor; other cytosolic factors or chaperones may also form a complex with the peroxisomal protein before it docks on the membrane. Peroxisomes have the unusual capacity to import proteins that are fully folded or assembled into oligomers. Although at least 20 proteins (mostly peroxins) are required for peroxisome biogenesis, the role of only a few of these have been determined. Future efforts will be directed towards an understanding of how these proteins interact and contribute to the complex process of protein import into peroxisomes.     

Rationalizing alpha-helical membrane protein crystallization

X-ray crystallography is currently the most successful method for determining the three-dimensional structure of membrane proteins. Nevertheless, growing the crystals required for this technique presents one of the major bottlenecks in this area of structural biology. This is especially true for the alpha-helical type membrane proteins that are of particular interest due to their medical relevance. To address this problem we have undertaken a detailed analysis of the crystallization conditions from 121 alpha-helical membrane protein structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. This information has been analyzed so that the success of different parameters can be easily compared for different membrane protein families. Concurrent with this analysis, we also present the new sparse matrix crystallization screen MemGold.     

Role of membrane contact sites in protein import into mitochondria

Mitochondria import more than 1,000 different proteins from the cytosol. The proteins are synthesized as precursors on cytosolic ribosomes and are translocated by protein transport machineries of the mitochondrial membranes. Five main pathways for protein import into mitochondria have been identified. Most pathways use the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM) as the entry gate into mitochondria. Depending on specific signals contained in the precursors, the proteins are subsequently transferred to different intramitochondrial translocases. In this article, we discuss the connection between protein import and mitochondrial membrane architecture. Mitochondria possess two membranes. It is a long‐standing question how contact sites between outer and inner membranes are formed and which role the contact sites play in the translocation of precursor proteins. A major translocation contact site is formed between the TOM complex and the presequence translocase of the inner membrane (TIM23 complex), promoting transfer of presequence‐carrying preproteins to the mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix. Recent findings led to the identification of contact sites that involve the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS) of the inner membrane. MICOS plays a dual role. It is crucial for maintaining the inner membrane cristae architecture and forms contacts sites to the outer membrane that promote translocation of precursor proteins into the intermembrane space and outer membrane of mitochondria. The view is emerging that the mitochondrial protein translocases do not function as independent units, but are embedded in a network of interactions with machineries that control mitochondrial activity and architecture.     

Biogenesis of porin of the outer mitochondrial membrane involves an import pathway via receptors and the general import pore of the TOM complex

Porin, also termed the voltage-dependent anion channel, is the most abundant protein of the mitochondrial outer membrane. The process of import and assembly of the protein is known to be dependent on the surface receptor Tom20, but the requirement for other mitochondrial proteins remains controversial. We have used mitochondria from Neurospora crassa and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to analyze the import pathway of porin. Import of porin into isolated mitochondria in which the outer membrane has been opened is inhibited despite similar levels of Tom20 as in intact mitochondria. A matrix-destined precursor and the porin precursor compete for the same translocation sites in both normal mitochondria and mitochondria whose surface receptors have been removed, suggesting that both precursors utilize the general import pore. Using an assay established to monitor the assembly of in vitro-imported porin into preexisting porin complexes we have shown that besides Tom20, the biogenesis of porin depends on the central receptor Tom22, as well as Tom5 and Tom7 of the general import pore complex (translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane [TOM] core complex). The characterization of two new mutant alleles of the essential pore protein Tom40 demonstrates that the import of porin also requires a functional Tom40. Moreover, the porin precursor can be cross-linked to Tom20, Tom22, and Tom40 on its import pathway. We conclude that import of porin does not proceed through the action of Tom20 alone, but requires an intact outer membrane and involves at least four more subunits of the TOM machinery, including the general import pore.     

Multiple pathways for the targeting of thylakoid proteins in chloroplasts

The assembly of the photosynthetic apparatus requires the import of numerous cytosolically synthesised proteins and their correct targeting into or across the thylakoid membrane. Biochemical and genetic studies have revealed the operation of several targeting pathways for these proteins, some of which are used for thylakoid lumen proteins whereas others are utilised by membrane proteins. Some pathways can be traced back to the prokarytoic ancestors of chloroplasts but at least one pathway appears to have arisen in response to the transfer of genes from the organelle to the nucleus. In this article we review recent findings in this field that point to the operation of a mechanistically unique protein translocase in both plastids and bacteria, and we discuss emerging data that reconcile the remarkable variety of targeting pathways with the natures of the substrate precursor proteins.     

Bcl-2 and porin follow different pathways of TOM-dependent insertion into the mitochondrial outer membrane

The bcl-2 gene encodes a 26kDa protein which functions as a central regulator of apoptosis. Here we investigated the pathway of Bcl-2alpha into the mitochondrial outer membrane using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism. We found that interactions of Bcl-2alpha with the mitochondrial import receptor Tom20 are dependent on two positively charged lysine residues in the immediate vicinity of the carboxy-terminal hydrophobic membrane anchor. The targeting function of these residues is independent of Tom22. Subsequent insertion of Bcl-2alpha into the mitochondrial outer membrane does not require Tom5 or Tom40, indicating that Bcl-2alpha bypasses the general import pore (GIP). Bcl-2alpha shows a unique pattern of interactions with the components of the mitochondrial TOM complex, demonstrating that at least two different pathways lead from the import receptor Tom20 into the mitochondrial outer membrane.     

Multiple variants of the human presequence translocase motor subunit Magmas govern the mitochondrial import

Mitochondrial protein translocation is an intricately regulated process that requires dedicated translocases at the outer and inner membranes. The presequence translocase complex, translocase of the inner membrane 23, facilitates most of the import of preproteins containing presequences into the mitochondria, and its primary structural organization is highly conserved. As part of the translocase motor, two J-proteins, DnaJC15 and DnaJC19, are recruited to form two independent translocation machineries (translocase A and translocase B, respectively). On the other hand, the J-like protein subunit of translocase of the inner membrane 23, Mitochondria-associated granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor signaling molecule (Magmas) (orthologous to the yeast subunit Pam16), can regulate human import-motor activity by forming a heterodimer with DnaJC19 and DnaJC15. However, the precise coordinated regulation of two human import motors by a single Magmas protein is poorly understood. Here, we report two additional Magmas variants (Magmas-1 and Magmas-2) constitutively expressed in the mammalian system. Both the Magmas variants are functional orthologs of Pam16 with an evolutionarily conserved J-like domain critical for cell survival. Moreover, the Magmas variants are peripherally associated with the inner membrane as part of the human import motor for translocation. Our results demonstrate that Magmas-1 is predominantly recruited to translocase B, whereas Magmas-2 is majorly associated with translocase A. Strikingly, both the variants exhibit differential J-protein inhibitory activity in modulating import motor, thereby regulating overall translocase function. Based on our findings, we hypothesize that additional Magmas variants are of evolutionary significance in humans to maximize protein import in familial-linked pathological conditions.     

MAS6 encodes an essential inner membrane component of the yeast mitochondrial protein import pathway

To identify new components that mediate mitochondrial protein import, we analyzed mas6, an import mutant in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. mas6 mutants are temperature sensitive for viability, and accumulate mitochondrial precursor proteins at the restrictive temperature. We show that mas6 does not correspond to any of the presently identified import mutants, and we find that mitochondria isolated from mas6 mutants are defective at an early stage of the mitochondrial protein import pathway. MAS6 encodes a 23-kD protein that contains several potential membrane spanning domains, and yeast strains disrupted for MAS6 are inviable at all temperatures and on all carbon sources. The Mas6 protein is located in the mitochondrial inner membrane and cannot be extracted from the membrane by alkali treatment. Antibodies to the Mas6 protein inhibit import into isolated mitochondria, but only when the outer membrane has been disrupted by osmotic shock. Mas6p therefore represents an essential import component located in the mitochondrial inner membrane.