Dbf4-Cdc7 Phosphorylation of Mcm2 Is Required for Cell Growth

The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase (DDK) is required for the activation of the origins of replication, and DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro. We find that budding yeast Cdc7 alone exists in solution as a weakly active multimer. Dbf4 forms a likely heterodimer with Cdc7, and this species phosphorylates Mcm2 with substantially higher specific activity. Dbf4 alone binds tightly to Mcm2, whereas Cdc7 alone binds weakly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to phosphorylate Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2 near the N terminus of the protein, Ser-164 and Ser-170. Expression of mcm2-S170A is lethal to yeast cells that lack endogenous MCM2 (mcm2Δ); however, this lethality is rescued in cells harboring the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth.The Cdc7 protein kinase is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate origins (1, 2). The S phase cyclin-dependent kinase also activates yeast origins of replication (3–5). It has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase, and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6). However, it is not known how Dbf4-Cdc7 (DDK)² acts during S phase to trigger the initiation of DNA replication. DDK has homologs in other eukaryotic species, and the role of Cdc7 in activation of replication origins during S phase may be conserved (7–10).The Mcm2-7 complex functions with Cdc45 and GINS to unwind DNA at a replication fork (11–15). A mutation of MCM5 (mcm5-bob1) bypasses the cellular requirements for DBF4 and CDC7 (16), suggesting a critical physiologic interaction between Dbf4-Cdc7 and Mcm proteins. DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro with proteins purified from budding yeast (17, 18) or human cells (19). Furthermore, there are mutants of MCM2 that show synthetic lethality with DBF4 mutants (6, 17), suggesting a biologically relevant interaction between DBF4 and MCM2. Nevertheless, the physiologic role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is a matter of dispute. In human cells, replacement of MCM2 DDK-phosphoacceptor residues with alanines inhibits DNA replication, suggesting that Dbf4-Cdc7 phosphorylation of Mcm2 in humans is important for DNA replication (20). In contrast, mutation of putative DDK phosphorylation sites at the N terminus of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm2 results in viable cells, suggesting that phosphorylation of S. pombe Mcm2 by DDK is not critical for cell growth (10).In budding yeast, Cdc7 is present at high levels in G₁ and S phase, whereas Dbf4 levels peak in S phase (18, 21, 22). Furthermore, budding yeast DDK binds to chromatin during S phase (6), and it has been shown that Dbf4 is required for Cdc7 binding to chromatin in budding yeast (23, 24), fission yeast (25), and Xenopus (9). Human and fission yeast Cdc7 are inert on their own (7, 8), but Dbf4-Cdc7 is active in phosphorylating Mcm proteins in budding yeast (6, 26), fission yeast (7), and human (8, 10). Based on these data, it has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6, 9, 18, 21–24). However, a mechanistic analysis of how Dbf4 activates Cdc7 has not yet been accomplished. For example, the multimeric state of the active Dbf4-Cdc7 complex is currently disputed. A heterodimer of fission yeast Cdc7 (Hsk1) in complex with fission yeast Dbf4 (Dfp1) can phosphorylate Mcm2 (7). However, in budding yeast, oligomers of Cdc7 exist in the cell (27), and Dbf4-Cdc7 exists as oligomers of 180 and 300 kDa (27).DDK phosphorylates the N termini of human Mcm2 (19, 20, 28), human Mcm4 (10), budding yeast Mcm4 (26), and fission yeast Mcm6 (10). Although the sequences of the Mcm N termini are poorly conserved, the DDK sites identified in each study have neighboring acidic residues. The residues of budding yeast Mcm2 that are phosphorylated by DDK have not yet been identified.In this study, we find that budding yeast Cdc7 is weakly active as a multimer in phosphorylating Mcm2. However, a low molecular weight form of Dbf4-Cdc7, likely a heterodimer, has a higher specific activity for phosphorylation of Mcm2. Dbf4 or DDK, but not Cdc7, binds tightly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2, Ser-164 and Ser-170, in an acidic region of the protein. Mutation of Ser-170 is lethal to yeast cells, but this phenotype is rescued by the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Ser-170 of Mcm2 is required for budding yeast growth.     

Protein N-terminal Acetyltransferases Act as N-terminal Propionyltransferases In Vitro and In Vivo

N-terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) is a highly abundant protein modification in eukaryotes catalyzed by N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs), which transfer an acetyl group from acetyl coenzyme A to the alpha amino group of a nascent polypeptide. Nt-acetylation has emerged as an important protein modifier, steering protein degradation, protein complex formation and protein localization. Very recently, it was reported that some human proteins could carry a propionyl group at their N-terminus. Here, we investigated the generality of N-terminal propionylation by analyzing its proteome-wide occurrence in yeast and we identified 10 unique in vivo Nt-propionylated N-termini. Furthermore, by performing differential N-terminome analysis of a control yeast strain (yNatA), a yeast NatA deletion strain (yNatAΔ) or a yeast NatA deletion strain expressing human NatA (hNatA), we were able to demonstrate that in vivo Nt-propionylation of several proteins, displaying a NatA type substrate specificity profile, depended on the presence of either yeast or human NatA. Furthermore, in vitro Nt-propionylation assays using synthetic peptides, propionyl coenzyme A, and either purified human NATs or immunoprecipitated human NatA, clearly demonstrated that NATs are Nt-propionyltransferases (NPTs) per se. We here demonstrate for the first time that Nt-propionylation can occur in yeast and thus is an evolutionarily conserved process, and that the NATs are multifunctional enzymes acting as NPTs in vivo and in vitro, in addition to their main role as NATs, and their potential function as lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) and noncatalytic regulators.Modifications greatly increases a cell''s proteome diversity confined by the natural amino acids. As more than 80% of human proteins, more than 70% of plant and fly proteins and more than 60% of yeast proteins are N-terminally acetylated (Nt-acetylated),¹ this modification represents one of the most common protein modifications in eukaryotes (1–5). Recent studies have pointed to distinct functional consequences of Nt-acetylation (6): creating degradation signals recognized by a ubiquitin ligase of a new branch of the N-end rule pathway (7), preventing translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (8), and mediating protein complex formation (9). Nt-acetylation further appears to be essential for life in higher eukaryotes; for instance, a mutation in the major human N-terminal acetyltransferase (NAT), hNatA, was recently shown to be the cause of Ogden syndrome by which male infants are underdeveloped and die at infancy (10). Unlike lysine acetylation, Nt-acetylation is considered an irreversible process, and further, to mainly occur on the ribosome during protein synthesis (11–15). In yeast and humans, three NAT complexes are responsible for the majority of Nt-acetylation; NatA, NatB and NatC, each of which has a defined substrate specificity (16). NatA acetylates Ser-, Ala-, Gly-, Thr-, Val- and Cys- N-termini generated on removal of the initiator methionine (iMet) (1, 17–19). NatB and NatC acetylate N-termini in which the iMet is followed by an acidic (20–23) or a hydrophobic residue respectively (24–26). Naa40p/NatD was shown to acetylate the Ser-starting N-termini of histones H2A and H4 (27, 28). NatE, composed of the catalytic Naa50p (Nat5p) has substrate specificity toward iMet succeeded by a hydrophobic amino acid (29, 30). As largely the same Nt-acetylation patterns are found in yeast and humans, it was believed that the NAT-machineries were conserved in general (31). However, the recently discovered higher eukaryotic specific NAT, Naa60p/NatF, was found to display a partially distinct substrate specificity in part explaining the higher degree of Nt-acetylation in higher versus lower eukaryotes (4).Human NatA is composed of two main subunits: the catalytic subunit hNaa10p and the auxiliary subunit, hNaa15p that is presumably responsible for anchoring the complex to the ribosome (14, 19). The chaperone-like HYPK protein is also stably associated with the NatA subunits and may be essential for efficient NatA activity (32). In addition, hNaa50p was shown to be physically associated with hNatA, however it is believed not to affect NatA activity (14, 33, 34). hNaa50p was also shown to exhibit N^ε-acetyltransferase (KAT) activity (29), however, the structure of hNaa50p with its peptide substrate bound strongly indicates that the peptide binding pocket is specifically suited to accommodate N-terminal peptides, as opposed to lysine residues (35). The human NatA subunits are associated with ribosomes, but interestingly, significant fractions are also nonribosomal (19, 30, 32). Of further notice, the catalytic subunits, hNaa10p and hNaa50p, were also found to partially act independently of the hNatA complex (30, 36).Recent studies have identified novel in vivo acyl modifications of proteins. Mass spectrometry data of affinity-enriched acetyllysine-containing peptides from HeLa cells showed the presence of propionylated and butyrylated lysines in histone H4 peptides (37). Similar analyses also showed the presence of propionylated lysines in p53, p300 and CREB-binding protein (38) besides the yeast histones H2B, H3 and H4 (39). Propionylated or butyrylated residues differ by only one or two extra methyl moieties as compared with their acetylated counterparts, thereby adding more hydrophobicity and bulkiness to the affected residue. To date, no distinct propionyl- or butyryltransferases responsible for these modifications have been identified. However, by using propionyl coenzyme A (Prop-CoA) or butyryl coenzyme A (But-CoA) as donors in the enzyme reaction, it was shown that some of the previously characterized lysine acetyltransferases (KATs) are able to respectively catalyze propionylation and butyrylation of lysine residues both in vitro (37, 40–42) and in vivo (38, 41). Similarly, it has been shown that lysine deacetylases also are capable of catalyzing depropionylation (40, 41, 43, 44) and debutyrylation (44) (see review (45)).Interestingly, mass spectrometry data also suggested that propionylated N-termini are present in human cell lines (46, 47). Until today, an N-terminal propionyl transferase (NPT) catalyzing N-terminal propionylation (Nt-propionylation) has to our knowledge not been identified.In this study, we hypothesized that NATs might have the ability to act as NPTs. In vitro experiments using purified hNaa10p, hNaa50p or immunoprecipitated human NatA complex indeed confirmed their intrinsic capacity to catalyze Nt-propionylation toward synthetic peptides. NatA was also found capable of Nt-butyrylation in vitro. By means of N-terminomics, we further investigated the presence of yeast Nt-propionylated proteins in vivo. Indeed, we found evidence for Nt-propionylation being a naturally occurring modification in yeast. Interestingly, in a yeast strain lacking NatA, we observed a loss in Nt-propionylation and Nt-acetylation for several NatA substrates, as compared with a control yeast strain expressing endogenous NatA or a strain ectopically expressing hNatA. Thus, besides acting as NATs, yeast and human NatA can act as NPTs and we thus demonstrate for the first time that NATs have the capacity of both acetylating and propionylating protein N-termini in vivo and in vitro.     

A Small Conserved Domain in the Yeast Spa2p Is Necessary and Sufficient for Its Polarized Localization

SPA2 encodes a yeast protein that is one of the first proteins to localize to sites of polarized growth, such as the shmoo tip and the incipient bud. The dynamics and requirements for Spa2p localization in living cells are examined using Spa2p green fluorescent protein fusions. Spa2p localizes to one edge of unbudded cells and subsequently is observable in the bud tip. Finally, during cytokinesis Spa2p is present as a ring at the mother–daughter bud neck. The bud emergence mutants bem1 and bem2 and mutants defective in the septins do not affect Spa2p localization to the bud tip. Strikingly, a small domain of Spa2p comprised of 150 amino acids is necessary and sufficient for localization to sites of polarized growth. This localization domain and the amino terminus of Spa2p are essential for its function in mating. Searching the yeast genome database revealed a previously uncharacterized protein which we name, Sph1p (Spa2p homolog), with significant homology to the localization domain and amino terminus of Spa2p. This protein also localizes to sites of polarized growth in budding and mating cells. SPH1, which is similar to SPA2, is required for bipolar budding and plays a role in shmoo formation. Overexpression of either Spa2p or Sph1p can block the localization of either protein fused to green fluorescent protein, suggesting that both Spa2p and Sph1p bind to and are localized by the same component. The identification of a 150–amino acid domain necessary and sufficient for localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth and the existence of this domain in another yeast protein Sph1p suggest that the early localization of these proteins may be mediated by a receptor that recognizes this small domain.Polarized cell growth and division are essential cellular processes that play a crucial role in the development of eukaryotic organisms. Cell fate can be determined by cell asymmetry during cell division (Horvitz and Herskowitz, 1992; Cohen and Hyman, 1994; Rhyu and Knoblich, 1995). Consequently, the molecules involved in the generation and maintenance of cell asymmetry are important in the process of cell fate determination. Polarized growth can occur in response to external signals such as growth towards a nutrient (Rodriguez-Boulan and Nelson, 1989; Eaton and Simons, 1995) or hormone (Jackson and Hartwell, 1990a , b ; Segall, 1993; Keynes and Cook, 1995) and in response to internal signals as in Caenorhabditis elegans (Goldstein et al., 1993; Kimble, 1994; Priess, 1994) and Drosophila melanogaster (St Johnston and Nusslein-Volhard, 1992; Anderson, 1995) early development. Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo polarized growth towards an external cue during mating and to an internal cue during budding. Polarization towards a mating partner (shmoo formation) and towards a new bud site requires a number of proteins (Chenevert, 1994; Chant, 1996; Drubin and Nelson, 1996). Many of these proteins are necessary for both processes and are localized to sites of polarized growth, identified by the insertion of new cell wall material (Tkacz and Lampen, 1972; Farkas et al., 1974; Lew and Reed, 1993) to the shmoo tip, bud tip, and mother–daughter bud neck. In yeast, proteins localized to growth sites include cytoskeletal proteins (Adams and Pringle, 1984; Kilmartin and Adams, 1984; Ford, S.K., and J.R. Pringle. 1986. Yeast. 2:S114; Drubin et al., 1988; Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Amatruda and Cooper, 1992; Lew and Reed, 1993; Waddle et al., 1996), neck filament components (septins) (Byers and Goetsch, 1976; Kim et al., 1991; Ford and Pringle, 1991; Haarer and Pringle, 1987; Longtine et al., 1996), motor proteins (Lillie and Brown, 1994), G-proteins (Ziman, 1993; Yamochi et al., 1994; Qadota et al., 1996), and two membrane proteins (Halme et al., 1996; Roemer et al., 1996; Qadota et al., 1996). Septins, actin, and actin-associated proteins localize early in the cell cycle, before a bud or shmoo tip is recognizable. How this group of proteins is localized to and maintained at sites of cell growth remains unclear.Spa2p is one of the first proteins involved in bud formation to localize to the incipient bud site before a bud is recognizable (Snyder, 1989; Snyder et al., 1991; Chant, 1996). Spa2p has been localized to where a new bud will form at approximately the same time as actin patches concentrate at this region (Snyder et al., 1991). An understanding of how Spa2p localizes to incipient bud sites will shed light on the very early stages of cell polarization. Later in the cell cycle, Spa2p is also found at the mother–daughter bud neck in cells undergoing cytokinesis. Spa2p, a nonessential protein, has been shown to be involved in bud site selection (Snyder, 1989; Zahner et al., 1996), shmoo formation (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990), and mating (Gehrung and Snyder, 1990; Chenevert et al., 1994; Yorihuzi and Ohsumi, 1994; Dorer et al., 1995). Genetic studies also suggest that Spa2p has a role in cytokinesis (Flescher et al., 1993), yet little is known about how this protein is localized to sites of polarized growth.We have used Spa2p green fluorescent protein (GFP)¹ fusions to investigate the early localization of Spa2p to sites of polarized growth in living cells. Our results demonstrate that a small domain of ∼150 amino acids of this large 1,466-residue protein is sufficient for targeting to sites of polarized growth and is necessary for Spa2p function. Furthermore, we have identified and characterized a novel yeast protein, Sph1p, which has homology to both the Spa2p amino terminus and the Spa2p localization domain. Sph1p localizes to similar regions of polarized growth and sph1 mutants have similar phenotypes as spa2 mutants.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

F-Actin Dynamics in Neurospora crassa

This study demonstrates the utility of Lifeact for the investigation of actin dynamics in Neurospora crassa and also represents the first report of simultaneous live-cell imaging of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons in filamentous fungi. Lifeact is a 17-amino-acid peptide derived from the nonessential Saccharomyces cerevisiae actin-binding protein Abp140p. Fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) or red fluorescent protein (TagRFP), Lifeact allowed live-cell imaging of actin patches, cables, and rings in N. crassa without interfering with cellular functions. Actin cables and patches localized to sites of active growth during the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity in germ tubes and conidial anastomosis tubes (CATs). Recurrent phases of formation and retrograde movement of complex arrays of actin cables were observed at growing tips of germ tubes and CATs. Two populations of actin patches exhibiting slow and fast movement were distinguished, and rapid (1.2 μm/s) saltatory transport of patches along cables was observed. Actin cables accumulated and subsequently condensed into actin rings associated with septum formation. F-actin organization was markedly different in the tip regions of mature hyphae and in germ tubes. Only mature hyphae displayed a subapical collar of actin patches and a concentration of F-actin within the core of the Spitzenkörper. Coexpression of Lifeact-TagRFP and β-tubulin–GFP revealed distinct but interrelated localization patterns of F-actin and microtubules during the initiation and maintenance of tip growth.Actins are highly conserved proteins found in all eukaryotes and have an enormous variety of cellular roles. The monomeric form (globular actin, or G-actin) can self-assemble, with the aid of numerous actin-binding proteins (ABPs), into microfilaments (filamentous actin, or F-actin), which, together with microtubules, form the two major components of the fungal cytoskeleton. Numerous pharmacological and genetic studies of fungi have demonstrated crucial roles for F-actin in cell polarity, exocytosis, endocytosis, cytokinesis, and organelle movement (6, 7, 20, 34, 35, 51, 52, 59). Phalloidin staining, immunofluorescent labeling, and fluorescent-protein (FP)-based live-cell imaging have revealed three distinct subpopulations of F-actin-containing structures in fungi: patches, cables, and rings (1, 14, 28, 34, 60, 63, 64). Actin patches are associated with the plasma membrane and represent an accumulation of F-actin around endocytic vesicles (3, 26, 57). Actin cables are bundles of actin filaments stabilized with cross-linking proteins, such as tropomyosins and fimbrin, and are assembled by formins at sites of active growth, where they form tracks for myosin V-dependent polarized secretion and organelle transport (10, 16, 17, 27, 38, 47, 48). Cables, unlike patches, are absolutely required for polarized growth in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (34, 38). Contractile actomyosin rings are essential for cytokinesis in budding yeast, whereas in filamentous fungi, actin rings are less well studied but are known to be involved in septum formation (20, 28, 34, 39, 40).Actin cables and patches have been particularly well studied in budding yeast. However, there are likely to be important differences between F-actin architecture and dynamics in budding yeast and those in filamentous fungi, as budding yeasts display only a short period of polarized growth during bud formation, which is followed by isotropic growth over the bud surface (10). Sustained polarized growth during hyphal morphogenesis is a defining feature of filamentous fungi (21), making them attractive models for studying the roles of the actin cytoskeleton in cell polarization, tip growth, and organelle transport.In Neurospora crassa and other filamentous fungi, disruption of the actin cytoskeleton leads to rapid tip swelling, which indicates perturbation of polarized tip growth, demonstrating a critical role for F-actin in targeted secretion to particular sites on the plasma membrane (7, 22, 29, 56). Immunofluorescence studies of N. crassa have shown that F-actin localizes to hyphal tips as “clouds” and “plaques” (7, 54, 59). However, immunolabeling has failed to reveal actin cables in N. crassa and offers limited insights into F-actin dynamics. Live-cell imaging of F-actin architecture and dynamics has not been accomplished in N. crassa, yet it is expected to yield key insights into cell polarization, tip growth, and intracellular transport.We took advantage of a recently developed live-cell imaging probe for F-actin called Lifeact (43). Lifeact is a 17-amino-acid peptide derived from the N terminus of the budding yeast actin-binding protein Abp140 (5, 63) and has recently been demonstrated to be a universal live-cell imaging marker for F-actin in eukaryotes (43). Here, we report the successful application of fluorescent Lifeact fusion constructs for live-cell imaging of F-actin in N. crassa. We constructed two synthetic genes consisting of Lifeact fused to “synthetic” green fluorescent protein (sGFP) (S65T) (henceforth termed GFP) (12) or red fluorescent protein (TagRFP) (33) and expressed these constructs in various N. crassa strains. In all strain backgrounds, fluorescent Lifeact constructs clearly labeled actin patches, cables, and rings and revealed a direct association of F-actin structures with sites of cell polarization and active tip growth. Our results demonstrate the efficacy of Lifeact as a nontoxic live-cell imaging probe in N. crassa.     

A Universal Chemical Enrichment Method for Mapping the Yeast N-glycoproteome by Mass Spectrometry (MS)

Glycosylation is one of the most common and important protein modifications in biological systems. Many glycoproteins naturally occur at low abundances, which makes comprehensive analysis extremely difficult. Additionally, glycans are highly heterogeneous, which further complicates analysis in complex samples. Lectin enrichment has been commonly used, but each lectin is inherently specific to one or several carbohydrates, and thus no single or collection of lectin(s) can bind to all glycans. Here we have employed a boronic acid-based chemical method to universally enrich glycopeptides. The reaction between boronic acids and sugars has been extensively investigated, and it is well known that the interaction between boronic acid and diols is one of the strongest reversible covalent bond interactions in an aqueous environment. This strong covalent interaction provides a great opportunity to catch glycopeptides and glycoproteins by boronic acid, whereas the reversible property allows their release without side effects. More importantly, the boronic acid-diol recognition is universal, which provides great capability and potential for comprehensively mapping glycosylation sites in complex biological samples. By combining boronic acid enrichment with PNGase F treatment in heavy-oxygen water and MS, we have identified 816 N-glycosylation sites in 332 yeast proteins, among which 675 sites were well-localized with greater than 99% confidence. The results demonstrated that the boronic acid-based chemical method can effectively enrich glycopeptides for comprehensive analysis of protein glycosylation. A general trend seen within the large data set was that there were fewer glycosylation sites toward the C termini of proteins. Of the 332 glycoproteins identified in yeast, 194 were membrane proteins. Many proteins get glycosylated in the high-mannose N-glycan biosynthetic and GPI anchor biosynthetic pathways. Compared with lectin enrichment, the current method is more cost-efficient, generic, and effective. This method can be extensively applied to different complex samples for the comprehensive analysis of protein glycosylation.Glycosylation is an extremely important protein modification that frequently regulates protein folding, trafficking, and stability. It is also involved in a wide range of cellular events (1) such as immune response (2, 3), cell proliferation (4), cell-cell interactions (5), and signal transduction (6). Aberrant protein glycosylation is believed to have a direct correlation with the development of several diseases, including diabetes, infectious diseases, and cancer (7–11). Secretory proteins frequently get glycosylated, including those in body fluids such as blood, saliva, and urine (12, 13). Samples containing these proteins can be easily obtained and used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Several glycoproteins have previously been identified as biomarkers, including Her2/Neu in breast cancer (14), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer (15), and CA125 in ovarian cancer (16, 17), which highlights the clinical importance of identifying glycoproteins as indicators or biomarkers of diseases. Therefore, effective methods for systematic analysis of protein glycosylation are essential to understand the mechanisms of glycobiology, identify drug targets and discover biomarkers.Approximately half of mammalian cell proteins are estimated to be glycosylated at any given time (18). There have been many reports regarding identification of protein glycosylation sites and elucidation of glycan structures (19–30). Glycan structure analysis can lead to potential therapeutic and diagnostic applications (31, 32), but it is also critical to identify which proteins are glycosylated as well as the sites at which the modification occurs. Despite progress in recent years, the large-scale analysis of protein glycosylation sites using MS-based proteomics methods is still a challenge. Without an effective enrichment method, the low abundance of glycoproteins prohibits the identification of the majority of sites using the popular intensity-dependent MS sequence method.About a decade ago, a very beautiful and elegant method based on hydrazide chemistry was developed to enrich glycopeptides. Hydrazide conjugated beads reacted with aldehydes formed from the oxidation of cis-diols in glycans (33). This method has been extensively applied to many different types of biological samples (34–41). Besides the hydrazide-based enrichment method, lectins have also been frequently used to enrich glycopeptides or glycoproteins before MS analysis (28, 29, 42–46). However, there are many different types of lectins, and each is specific to certain glycans (47, 48). Therefore, no combination of lectins can bind to all glycosylated peptides or proteins, which prevents comprehensive analysis of protein glycosylation. Because of the complexity of biological samples, effective enrichment methods are critical for the comprehensive analysis of protein glycosylation before MS analysis.One common feature of all glycoproteins and glycopeptides is that they contain multiple hydroxyl groups in their glycans. From a chemistry point of view, this can be exploited to effectively enrich them. Ideally, chemical enrichment probes must have both strong and specific interactions with multiple hydroxyl groups. The reaction between boronic acids and 1,2- or 1,3-cis-diols in sugars has been extensively studied (49–52) and applied for the small-scale analysis of glycoproteins (53–55). Furthermore, boronate affinity chromatography has been employed for the analysis of nonenzymatically glycated peptides (56, 57). Boronic acid-based chemical enrichment methods are expected to have great potential for global analysis of glycopeptides when combined with modern MS-based proteomics techniques. However, the method has not yet been used for the comprehensive analysis of protein N-glycosylation in complex biological samples (58).Yeast is an excellent model biological system that has been extensively used in a wide range of experiments. Last year, two papers reported the large-scale analysis of protein N-glycosylation in yeast (59, 60). In one study, a new MS-based method was developed based on N-glycopeptide mass envelopes with a pattern via metabolic incorporation of a defined mixture of N-acetylglucosamine isotopologs into N-glycans. Peptides with the recoded envelopes were specifically targeted for fragmentation, facilitating high confidence site mapping (59). Using this method, 133 N-glycosylation sites were confidently identified in 58 yeast proteins. When combined with an effective enrichment method, this MS-based analysis will provide a more complete coverage of the N-glycoproteome. The other work combined lectin enrichment with digestion by two enzymes (Glu_c and trypsin) to increase the peptide coverage, and 516 well-localized N-glycosylation sites were identified in 214 yeast proteins by MS (60).Here we have comprehensively identified protein N-glycosylation sites in yeast by combining a boronic acid-based chemical enrichment method with MS-based proteomics techniques. Magnetic beads conjugated with boronic acid were systematically optimized to selectively enrich glycosylated peptides from yeast whole cell lysates. The enriched peptides were subsequently treated with Peptide-N4-(N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminyl)asparagine amidase (PNGase F)¹ in heavy-oxygen water. Finally, peptides were analyzed by an on-line LC-MS system. Over 800 protein N-glycosylation sites were identified in the yeast proteome, which clearly demonstrates that the boronic acid-based chemical method is an effective enrichment method for large-scale analysis of protein glycosylation by MS.     

A Saccharomyces cerevisiae Model Reveals In Vivo Functional Impairment of the Ogden Syndrome N-Terminal Acetyltransferase NAA10 Ser37Pro Mutant

N-terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) occurs on the majority of eukaryotic proteins and is catalyzed by N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs). Nt-acetylation is increasingly recognized as a vital modification with functional implications ranging from protein degradation to protein localization. Although early genetic studies in yeast demonstrated that NAT-deletion strains displayed a variety of phenotypes, only recently, the first human genetic disorder caused by a mutation in a NAT gene was reported; boys diagnosed with the X-linked Ogden syndrome harbor a p.Ser37Pro (S37P) mutation in the gene encoding Naa10, the catalytic subunit of the NatA complex, and suffer from global developmental delays and lethality during infancy. Here, we describe a Saccharomyces cerevisiae model developed by introducing the human wild-type or mutant NatA complex into yeast lacking NatA (NatA-Δ). The wild-type human NatA complex phenotypically complemented the NatA-Δ strain, whereas only a partial rescue was observed for the Ogden mutant NatA complex suggesting that hNaa10 S37P is only partially functional in vivo. Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed a reduced subunit complexation for the mutant hNatA S37P next to a reduced in vitro catalytic activity. We performed quantitative Nt-acetylome analyses on a control yeast strain (yNatA), a yeast NatA deletion strain (yNatA-Δ), a yeast NatA deletion strain expressing wild-type human NatA (hNatA), and a yeast NatA deletion strain expressing mutant human NatA (hNatA S37P). Interestingly, a generally reduced degree of Nt-acetylation was observed among a large group of NatA substrates in the yeast expressing mutant hNatA as compared with yeast expressing wild-type hNatA. Combined, these data provide strong support for the functional impairment of hNaa10 S37P in vivo and suggest that reduced Nt-acetylation of one or more target substrates contributes to the pathogenesis of the Ogden syndrome. Comparative analysis between human and yeast NatA also provided new insights into the co-evolution of the NatA complexes and their substrates. For instance, (Met-)Ala- N termini are more prevalent in the human proteome as compared with the yeast proteome, and hNatA displays a preference toward these N termini as compared with yNatA.Up to 85% of soluble eukaryotic proteins carry an N-terminal acetyl group at their N terminus, which is the result of a co-translational protein modification referred to as N-terminal protein acetylation (Nt-acetylation) or N^α-acetylation (1). This presumed irreversible protein modification is catalyzed by a specific category of the GCN5-related N-acetyltransferase domain containing superfamily of acetyltransferases; the ribosome associated N-terminal acetyltransferases or NATs¹ (2). NATs catalyze the acetyl transfer from acetyl coenzyme A (Ac-CoA) to a primary α-amine of the first amino acid residue of a nascent protein chain. In eukaryotes, NATs are composed of at least one catalytic subunit and mainly target different substrate N termini based on their N-terminal sequences (3).To date, five human NATs hNatA, hNatB, and hNatC; constituting the major human NAT complexes, and hNatD and hNatF have been identified and their substrate specificity characterized (1, 4–8). In addition, a putative hNatE complex has been described (9–10). Except for NatF, which is only expressed in higher eukaryotes (1), the substrate specificity profiles of the NatA-E complexes seem to be conserved among eukaryotes (5–9, 11–13).Contrary to the original assumption that Nt-acetylation protected proteins from degradation (14), it was more recently demonstrated that this modification creates specific degradation signals (termed Ac/N-degrons) in cellular proteins, thereby diversifying this original view substantially. These degrons target at least some Nt-acetylated proteins for the conditional degradation by a novel branch of the N-end rule pathway, an ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system (15–16). In addition, numerous reports implicate Nt-acetylation in cellular differentiation, survival, metabolism, and proliferation, thereby linking it to cancer (17–18). As such, Nt-acetylation is now linked to a whole range of molecular implications including protein destabilization and degradation by the Nt-acetylation dependent recruitment of ubiquitin ligases (15–16), protein translocation (19), membrane attachment (20), and protein complex formation (21).Among all characterized NATs, NatA displays the broadest substrate specificity profile and thus represents the primary NAT in terms of substrate N termini as it is responsible for the Nt-acetylation of the methionine aminopeptidase (MetAP) iMet-processed serine, threonine, alanine, glycine, and valine starting N termini (3). The human NatA complex is composed of two essential subunits; the catalytic subunit hNaa10 (hARD1) and the regulatory subunit hNaa15 (NATH/hNAT1) (4). Deregulations of hNaa10 and/or NatA expression have been linked to various signaling molecules including hypoxia inducible factor-1α, DNA methyltransferase1/E-cadherin, β-catenin/cyclin D1, and Bcl-xL, showing its involvement in hypoxia, tumorigenesis, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis (17, 22–26).Recently, the first structures of NATs and a NAT-complex were solved, providing a molecular understanding of the sequence specific Nt-acetylation of protein N termini (27–30). Structural analyses of noncomplexed Naa10 and NatA from Schizosaccharomyces pombe reveal an allosteric modulator function of Naa15 in steering Naa10 specificity and provide a rational for the distinctive substrate specificity profiles observed when assaying non-complexed versus complexed Naa10 (10, 27), with both forms co-existing in cells (10). In particular, three essential catalytic Naa10 residues were found to be incorrectly positioned in non-complexed Naa10, while these shift into the active site in Naa15-complexed Naa10, thereby permitting canonical NatA-mediated Nt-acetylation. Interestingly, noncomplexed Naa10 was shown to efficiently Nt-acetylate glutamate and aspartate starting N termini, whereas poorly acetylating canonical NatA type N termini (10). The study of Liszczak et al. further showed that NatA substrate binding specificity was coupled to the catalytic mechanism being used (27). More specifically, an essential glutamate residue (Glu24 in the protein accession {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"Q9UTI3","term_id":"74625957","term_text":"Q9UTI3"}}Q9UTI3 (Swiss-Prot)) involved in catalysis, precludes methionine from entering the specificity pocket, whereas cognate NatA substrate N-terminal residues can easily be accommodated. Interestingly, and in contrast to NatA, both wild-type Naa10 and Glu24 mutated Naa10 (Naa10 E24A) were still capable of Nt-acetylating acidic amino acid starting N termini, most likely because of the substrate side-chain carboxyl moiety acting as a functional replacement group in the process of catalysis, whereas essentially no activity could be observed when probing a cognate NatA substrate (27).Early yeast studies demonstrated that strains with mutated or deleted NAT genes were viable, but displayed a number of different phenotypes (31). For NatA, the first phenotypes described were defects in sporulation, mating, and entry into stationary phase when NAA10 (ARD1) was mutated (32). Four years later, the overlapping phenotypes of NAA10 and NAA15 (NAT1) mutant strains, revealed, along with other data, that Naa10 and Naa15 are in fact components of the NatA acetyltransferase complex (33–34). As compared with NatA phenotypes, NatB phenotypes are more severe, including slow growth and defects in mitochondrial inheritance (35–36). NatC subunits were initially found to be essential for propagation of the l-A dsRNA virus, and further for growth on nonfermentable carbon sources (37–39). The first reports implicating NAT gene point mutations in human genetic disorders only recently emerged. More specifically, two different point mutations in the X-linked NAA10 gene were both found to cause developmental delays and were linked to the Ogden syndrome (S37P) (40) and intellectual disability (R116W) (41), highlighting the essential importance of NATs and protein Nt-acetylation in biology and disease. Further, in Caenorhabditis elegans (42), Drosophila melanogaster (43), and Trypanosoma brucei (44), Naa10 was proven to be essential and, strengthened by the observed detrimental effects of NAA10 mutations (40–41), the NAA10 gene function is also believed to be essential in human.Ogden syndrome boys harboring the p.Ser37Pro variant in the gene encoding Naa10 are characterized by craniofacial abnormalities, failure to thrive, developmental delay, hypotonia, cardiac arrhythmias, cryptorchidism, and an aged appearance, ultimately resulting in mortality during infancy (40). Although this mutation was shown to significantly impair Naa10 catalytic activity in vitro, we here assessed the influence and functional in vitro and in vivo consequences of this mutation on NatA complex formation and NatA activity in a yeast model. By phenotypic screening in yeast, we show that hNaa10 S37P displays a significantly impaired functionality in vivo. Further, using immunoprecipitation, we show that the human Naa10-Naa15 complex formation is negatively affected by the S37P mutation, and that immunoprecipitated hNatA S37P also displays a reduced in vitro catalytic activity as compared with wild-type hNatA. Finally, quantitative Nt-acetylome analyses suggest that reduced Nt-acetylation of one or more target substrates contributes to the pathogenesis of the Ogden syndrome.     

Differential Regulation of Actin Polymerization and Structure by Yeast Formin Isoforms

The budding yeast formins, Bnr1 and Bni1, behave very differently with respect to their interactions with muscle actin. However, the mechanisms underlying these differences are unclear, and these formins do not interact with muscle actin in vivo. We use yeast wild type and mutant actins to further assess these differences between Bnr1 and Bni1. Low ionic strength G-buffer does not promote actin polymerization. However, Bnr1, but not Bni1, causes the polymerization of pyrene-labeled Mg-G-actin in G-buffer into single filaments based on fluorometric and EM observations. Polymerization by Bnr1 does not occur with Ca-G-actin. By cosedimentation, maximum filament formation occurs at a Bnr1:actin ratio of 1:2. The interaction of Bnr1 with pyrene-labeled S265C Mg-actin yields a pyrene excimer peak, from the cross-strand interaction of pyrene probes, which only occurs in the context of F-actin. In F-buffer, Bnr1 promotes much faster yeast actin polymerization than Bni1. It also bundles the F-actin in contrast to the low ionic strength situation where only single filaments form. Thus, the differences previously observed with muscle actin are not actin isoform-specific. The binding of both formins to F-actin saturate at an equimolar ratio, but only about 30% of each formin cosediments with F-actin. Finally, addition of Bnr1 but not Bni1 to pyrene-labeled wild type and S265C Mg-F actins enhanced the pyrene- and pyrene-excimer fluorescence, respectively, suggesting Bnr1 also alters F-actin structure. These differences may facilitate the ability of Bnr1 to form the actin cables needed for polarized delivery of nutrients and organelles to the growing yeast bud.Bni1 and Bnr1 are the two formin isoforms expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1, 2). These proteins, as other isoforms in the formin family, are large multidomain proteins (3, 4). Several regulatory domains, including one for binding the G-protein rho, are located at the N-terminal half of the protein (4–7). FH1, FH2, and Bud6 binding domains are located in the C-terminal half of the protein (8). The formin homology 1 (FH1)² domain contains several sequential poly-l-proline motifs, and it interacts with the profilin/actin complex to recruit actin monomers and regulate the insertion of actin monomers at the barbed end of actin (9–11). The fomin homology domain 2 (FH2) forms a donut-shaped homodimer, which wraps around actin dimers at the barbed end of actin filaments (12, 13). One important function of formin is to facilitate actin polymerization by stabilizing actin dimers or trimers under polymerization conditions and then to processively associate with the barbed end of the elongating filament to control actin filament elongation kinetics (13–18).A major unsolved protein in the study of formins is the elucidation of the individual functions of different isoforms and their regulation. In vivo, these two budding yeast formins have distinct cellular locations and dynamics (1, 2, 19, 20). Bni1 concentrates at the budding site before the daughter cell buds from the mother cell, moves along with the tip of the daughter cell, and then travels back to the neck between daughter and mother cells at the end of segregation. Bnr1 localizes only at the neck of the budding cell in a very short period of time after bud emergence. Although a key cellular function of these two formins in yeast is to promote actin cable formation (8, 18), the roles of the individual formins in different cellular process is unclear because deleting either individual formin gene has limited impact on cell growth and deleting both genes together is lethal (21).Although each of the two formins can nucleate actin filament formation in vitro, the manner in which they affect polymerization is distinctly isoform-specific. Most of this mechanistic work in vitro has used formin fragments containing the FH1 and FH2 domains. Bni1 alone processively caps the barbed end of actin filaments partially inhibiting polymerization at this end (14, 16, 18). The profilin-actin complex, recruited to the actin barbed end through its binding to Bni1 FH1 domain, possibly raises the local actin concentration and appears to allow this inhibition to be overcome, thereby, accelerating barbed end polymerization. It has also been shown that this complex modifies the kinetics of actin dynamics at the barbed end (9, 11, 18, 22). Moreover, Bni1 participation leads only to the formation of single filaments (8). In comparison, the Bnr1 FH1-FH2 domain facilitates actin polymerization much more efficiently than does Bni1. Moseley and Goode (8) showed Bnr1 accelerates actin polymerization up to 10 times better than does Bni and produces actin filament bundles when the Bnr1/actin molar ratio is above 1:2. Finally, the regulation of Bni1 and Bnr1 by formin binding is different. For example, Bud 6/Aip3, a yeast cell polarity factor, binds to Bni1, but not Bnr1, and also stimulates its activity in vitro.For their studies, Moseley and Goode (8) utilized mammalian skeletal muscle actin instead of the S. cerevisiae actin with which the yeast formins are designed to function. It is entirely possible that the differences observed with the two formins are influenced quantitatively or qualitatively by the nature of the actin used in the study. This possibility must be seriously considered because although yeast and muscle actins are 87% identical in sequence, they display marked differences in their polymerization behavior (23). Yeast actin nucleates filaments better than muscle actin (24, 25). It appears to form shorter and more flexible filaments than does muscle actin (26, 27). Finally, the disposition of the P_i released during the hydrolysis of ATP that occurs during polymerization is different. Yeast actin releases its P_i concomitant with hydrolysis of the bound ATP whereas muscle actin retains the P_i for a significant amount of time following nucleotide hydrolysis (28, 29). This difference is significant because ADP-P_i F-actin has been shown to be more stable than ADP F-actin (30). Another example of this isoform dependence is the interaction of yeast Arp2/3 with yeast versus muscle actins (31). Yeast Arp2/3 complex accelerates polymerization of muscle actin only in the presence of a nucleation protein factor such as WASP. However, with yeast actin, no such auxiliary protein is required. In light of these actin behavioral differences, to better understand the functional differences of these two formins in vivo, we have studied the behavior of Bni 1 and Bnr 1 with WT and mutant yeast actins, and we have also explored the molecular basis underlying the Bnr 1-induced formation of actin nuclei from G-actin.