The effect of superhelicity on the interaction of histone f1 with closed circular duplex DNA.

A set of covalently closed circular duplex simian virus 40 DNA preparations of varying superhelical densities was prepared by closure of nicked duplex DNA with polynucleotide ligase in the presence of varying amounts of ethidium. The resulting molecules were tested for complex formation with the lysine-rich histone f1. The results confirmed earlier experiments in demonstrating that f1 histone reacts preferentially with superhelical DNA compared to relaxed circular DNA. Furthermore, the extent of the reaction is demonstrated to depend on the superhelical density. At the relatively low ratios of histone to DNA used in these experiments, the product of the interaction of f1 histone with superhelical DNA does not precipitate. At higher ratios of histone to DNA, an insoluble aggregate is formed.     

The effect of H1 histone on the action of DNA-relaxing enzyme.

The action of DNA-relaxing enzyme on H1-DNA complexes was investigated. Complexes of superhelical and relaxed closed circular duplex DNA with H1 were treated with mammalian relaxing enzyme, deproteinized, and electrophoresed on agarose gels. At relatively low ratios of H1 to superhelical DNA, molecules of superhelical density intermediate between those of the starting material and relaxed DNA, the normal product, were generated. At relatively high H1 histone concentrations (H1:DNA greater than 0.4 w/w), the superhelical DNA was not relaxed. Further, no superhelical turns were introduced into relaxed closed duplex DNA at any concentration of H1 tested. Thus, the binding of H1 histone to DNA prevents the action of the relaxing enzyme. Moreover, H1 histone does not appear to unwind the DNA duplex upon binding. The implications of these observations and the previously demonstrated specificity of H1 histone for superhelical DNA are discussed in relation to the structure of chromatin.     

Studies on the interaction of H1 histone with superhelical DNA: characterization of the recognition and binding regions of H1 histones.

The very lysine rich histone, H1, isolated from a variety of sources interacts preferentially with superhelical DNA compared to relaxed DNA duplexes. The nature of this specific interaction has been investigated by studying the ability of various purified fragments of H1 histone from calf thymus to recognize and bind superhelical DNA. The data suggest that the globular region of the H1 histone molecule (amino acid residues 72-106) is involved in the recognition of superhelical DNA. Thus, the H1 histone carboxy-terminal fragment, 72-212, resembles native H1 histone both quantitatively and qualitatively in its ability to discriminate between and bind to superhelical and relaxed DNA while the H1 histone carboxy-terminal fragment, residues 106-212, has lost this specificity, binding superhelical and relaxed DNA equally well. Furthermore, under conditions in which the globular region of the intact H1 histone has been unfolded, the molecule loses its ability to discriminate between superhelical and relaxed DNA, and binds both forms of DNA equally.     

H5 Histone and DNA-relaxing enzyme of chicken erythrocytes. Interaction with superhelical DNA.

The interaction of closed circular duplex DNA with the lysine-rich H5 histone fraction of avian erythrocytes has been studied. H5, like H1 histone, interacts preferentially with superhelical DNA. The extent of interaction increases with increasing negative or positive superhelicity. Salt-extracted lysine-rich histones show the same specificity for interaction with superhelices as do acid-extracted preparations. Chicken erythrocyte nuclei contain DNA-relaxing enzyme. This enzyme is extracted from the nuclei at lower salt concentrations than those required to extract H1 and H5 histones and is, therefore, probably a function of a protein distinct from H1 and H5 histones.     

Interaction of histone H1 with superhelical DNA. Sedimentation and electron microscopical studies at low salt concentration

Complexes of histones H1 with superhelical SV40 DNA obtained by direct mixing were studied in 0.1 SSC buffer corresponding to 0.02 M Na+. Depending on the molar input ratio H1/DNA three classes of sedimenting species were observed: (1) a component sedimenting similar to superhelical DNA with a sedimentation coefficient s2o,w of 25 S observable up to 335 Mol H1/Mol DNA (w/w = 2); (2) a component with s2o,w = 120 S appearing at 135 Mol H1/Mol DNA and (3) growing amounts of heterogeneous aggregates greater than 1000 S. Electron micrographs revealed the 25 S component to consist of double-fibers formed from one DNA molecule and the 120 S component to consist of bundles of several such double-fibers. The aggregates represent cable-like structures. The addition of ethidium bromide to 25 S complexes induces the formation of bundles, if H1 is present in a quantity which alone is not sufficient to bring about this effect. This result indicates that ethidium bromide effects a redistribution of H1 molecules and that H1 is responsible for the bundle formation.     

Linker histone interaction shows divalent character with both supercoiled and linear DNA

The interaction of linker histone H1 with both linear and superhelical double-stranded DNA has been investigated at low ionic strengths. Gel mobility retardation experiments demonstrate strikingly different behavior for the two forms of DNA. First, the experiments strongly suggest that linker histone binds to superhelical DNA in a negatively cooperative mode. In contrast, binding of linker histone to linear DNA under the conditions employed here shows no cooperativity. Second, binding of linker histone to linear DNA results in aggregation of histone-DNA complexes, even at very low levels of input histone H1. Because H1 has been shown to interact as a monomer, this aggregation is evidence of the divalent character of the linker histone, for without H1's ability to bind to two duplex strands of DNA, aggregation could not occur. Although aggregation can be made to occur with superhelical DNA, it can do so only at near-saturation levels of input histone H1. Finally, in direct competition, linker histone binds to superhelical DNA to the complete exclusion of linear DNA, indicating that the linker histone's function is related to the crossover structures that differentiate superhelical DNA from linear DNA. We develop a model that explains the observed behavior of binding of linker histone to superhelical DNA that is consistent with both the divalent character of the linker histone and the negative cooperativity by which linker histone and superhelical DNA interact.     

Effect of salt on the binding of the linker histone H1 to DNA and nucleosomes

The linker histones are involved in the salt-dependent folding of the nucleosomes into higher-order chromatin structures. To better understand the mechanism of action of these histones in chromatin, we studied the interactions of the linker histone H1 with DNA at various histone/DNA ratios and at different ionic strengths. In direct competition experiments, we have confirmed the binding of H1 to superhelical DNA in preference to linear or nicked circular DNA forms. We show that the electrophoretic mobility of the H1/supercoiled DNA complex decreases with increasing H1 concentrations and increases with ionic strengths. These results indicate that the interaction of the linker histone H1 with supercoiled DNA results in a soluble binding of H1 with DNA at low H1 or salt concentrations and aggregation at higher H1 concentrations. Moreover, we show that H1 dissociates from the DNA or nucleosomes at high salt concentrations. By the immobilized template pull-down assay, we confirm these data using the physiologically relevant nucleosome array template.     

Interaction between lysine-rich histones and DNA

Using a membrane filter retention technique we have studied the interaction between DNA and lysine rich histone H5 in vitro. It is found that, depending on the ionic conditions, H5 can bind DNA in a random or cooperative manner and exhibits a preference to DNA with high molecular weight and/or high A+T content, as also observed with H1. The presence of 6 M urea in the assay mixture does not impair the selectivity of H5 to A+T rich DNA but partly affects its selectivity to DNA size. In contrast to H1, H5 does not discrimate between the superhelical and relaxed forms of circular SV40 DNA.     

Relaxation of chromatin structure upon removal of histones H2A and H2B

Modification of chromatin from chicken erythrocytes with dimethylmaleic anhydride is accompanied by its solubilization and the dissociation of histones H1, H5, H2A and H2B. Histone H1 is the first to dissociate and H5 the last. After regeneration of the modified amino groups, residual chromatin preparations with different histone composition were studied by circular dichroism and thermal denaturation. In addition to the effects produced by the lack of histones H1 and H5, both techniques show a substantial relaxation of chromatin structure induced by the loss of histones H2A and H2B, which appear to play an important role in the superhelical folding of DNA.     

Interaction of histone H1 from sea urchin sperm with superhelical and relaxed DNA

Complexes of histone H1 from sea urchin sperm (H1S) and calf thymus (H1T) with superhelical DNA I and relaxed circular DNA II have been analyzed by analytical sedimentation. Similar to H1T, the highly basic and relatively arginine-rich histone H1S preferentially interacts with DNA I compared to DNA II under competition conditions. However, H1S induces a stronger aggregation of bothforms of DNA than H1T. Below 0.05 M NaCl, the soluble complexes formed by both histones have similar properties, but aggregation proceeds in a different manner: H1S induces a stronger aggregation of DNA II as compared to DNA I, whereas H1T fails to aggregate DNA I.The results are explained on the basis of differences in amino acid sequence and structure of the two histones and related to the special chromatin condensing ability of histone H1S.     

Formation and characterization of soluble complexes of histone H1 with supercoiled DNA

We have analyzed the interaction of rat liver histone H1 with superhelical DNA. Depending on the ratio of H1 to DNA and the concentration of salt, two different types of complexes were found. Above a critical ratio of H1 to DNA, called the aggregation point, large aggregates are formed, which have a cable-like appearance in the electron microscope. Below the aggregation point, individual soluble complexes are formed, which are the subject of this study. With increasing ionic strength, the aggregation point is shifted towards lower ratios of H1 to DNA. In the soluble complexes, H1 appears to bind along superhelically intertwined DNA strands, forming a polymer. Partial digestion of the complexes with protease suggests protection of the N-terminal tail and the globular domain of H1. Similar soluble complexes were observed with various H1 fragments but not with the core histones. In the soluble complexes, similar regions of the H1 molecule are considered to be protected from cleavage by protease, as in chromatin. Therefore, these complexes appear to be a valuable model for the interaction of H1 in chromatin fibers.     

Unwinding of chromatin by the SV40 large T antigen DNA helicase.

We have analysed the unwinding of nucleosomally organized DNA by simian virus 40 large tumour (T) antigen. Isolated T antigen can bind to existing nucleosome cores containing the viral replication origin sequence, which results in displacement of the histone octamer and unwinding of the DNA. However, specific binding to nucleosome cores is salt sensitive and nearly completely blocked under ionic conditions that otherwise support DNA replication. Once started, the progressing T antigen helicase, like an elongating RNA polymerase, is not further repressed by histone octamers, irrespective of the presence or absence of linker histone H1. Disruption of the nucleosomal structure in the process of unwinding may be assisted by the demonstrated interaction of the hexameric T antigen complex with histone proteins H1 and H3. Finally, our studies reveal the inability of topoisomerase I and/or II to continually relieve the superhelical tension of covalently closed circular minichromosomes as generated during their unwinding by T antigen. This may indicate that chromatin relaxation during the process of DNA replication can only be efficiently performed by a topoisomerase that is (trans)activated by other factors.     

Differences among subfractions of H1 histone in retention of linear and superhelical DNA on filters

Four kinds of rabbit thymus H1 histone differ among themselves in their ability to retain DNA on nitrocellulose filters. This is true for linear, or superhelical DNA, but the order of effectiveness of the different H1 histones depends on the physical conformation of the DNA. For linear DNA the binding efficiencies of the H1 histones are: RTL2 = RTL3 greater than RTL4 greater than RTL1. This order of effectiveness parallels the effectiveness of the H1 histones previously found for the condensation of linear DNA as observed by circular dichroism and viscosity. The binding efficiencies of the various histones toward superhelical DNA were: RTL4 greater than RTL3 greater than RTL1 greater than RTL2. The variation in amino acid sequence between different rabbit thymus H1 histones might thus introduce structural variations in nucleohistone fibers and perhaps in chromatin.     

Supercoiling energy and nucleosome formation: the role of the arginine-rich histone kernel.

We have formed complexes of relaxed closed circular Col E1 DNA with various combinations of histones, and examined the effects of treating the complexes with nicking-closing enzyme. Germond et al (1) have shown that when a mixture of the four core histones of the nucleosome (HIA, H2B, H3 and H4) is used in such an experiment, the subsequently isolated DNA is supercoiled. We find that the arginine-rich histone pair, H3 and H4, is sufficient to induce the supercoiling observed in this experiment. Both H3 and H4 are required, and in the absence of either, no other histones are effective. H3 and and H4 are as efficient, per unit weight, as a mixture of the four histones in inducing supercoils. We also show that there is a large difference between the DNA bending energy needed to form a nucleosome and that needed to form one turn of normal superhelical DNA. These two processes are energetically quite distinct and probably separable. We estimate the free energy of interaction between DNA-bound histone pairs, and find that one or two such interactions would generate enough energy to fold the DNA into a nucleosome.     

Dye titrations of covalently closed supercoiled DNA analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

We have developed a rapid electrophoretic technique for performing ethidium bromide dye titrations in cylindrical 0.7% agarose gels. The technique was used to analyze the extent of supercoiling in circular covalently closed SV40, Co1E1, and pSC101 DNA. We have estimated the superhelical densities of SV40, Co1E1, and pSC101 DNA to be ?0.050, ?0.078, and ?0.085 respectively. The results obtained for native SV40 DNA correlate well with previously published values for the superhelical density of this DNA when these values are corrected to reflect a 26° duplex unwinding angle for ethidium bromide. Ethidium bromide concentrations sufficient to partially relax a supercoiled DNA allow the DNA to be resolved into a series of discrete bands in agarose gels. The distribution of bands represents a natural heterogeneity in the superhelical densities of the DNA molecules in the population.     

Histone stoichiometry and DNA circularization in archaeal nucleosomes.

Recombinant (r)HMfB (archaealhistone B fromMethanothermusfervidus) formed complexes with increasing stability with DNA molecules increasing in length from 52 to 100 bp, but not with a 39 bp molecule. By using125I-labeled rHMfB-YY (an rHMfB variant with I31Y and M35Y replacements) and32P-labeled 100 bp DNA, these complexes, designated archaeal nucleosomes, have been shown to contain an archaeal histone tetramer. Consistent with DNA bending and wrapping, addition of DNA ligase to archaeal nucleosomes assembled with 88 and 128 bp DNAs resulted in covalently-closed monomeric circular DNAs which, following histone removal, were positively supercoiled based on their electrophoretic mobilities in the presence of ethidium bromide before and after relaxation by calf thymus topoisomerase I. Ligase addition to mixtures of rHMfB with 53 or 30 bp DNA molecules also resulted in circular DNAs but these were circular dimers and trimers. These short DNA molecules apparently had to be ligated into longer linear multimers for assembly into archaeal nucleosomes and ligation into circles. rHMfB assembled into archaeal nucleosomes at lower histone to DNA ratios with the supercoiled, circular ligation product than with the original 88 bp linear version of this molecule. Archaeal histones are most similar to the globular histone fold region of eukaryal histone H4, and the results reported are consistent with archaeal nucleosomes resembling the structure formed by eukaryal histone (H3+H4)2tetramers.     

Negatively supercoiled DNA from plants infected with a single-stranded DNA virus

A method for isolating covalently closed circular double-stranded DNA from plants infected with the geminivirus, tomato golden mosaic virus, is described. Ethidium bromide titration showed this DNA to be negatively supercoiled with a superhelical density of -0.062. The presence of S1 nuclease-sensitive secondary structure in the supercoiled DNA was demonstrated by its conversion to the open circular and linear DNA forms on treatment with this enzyme.     

Interaction of histone H1 with superhelical DNA conformational studies and influence of ionic strength

The interaction of histone H1 with superhelical SV40 DNA at low ionic strength (0.02 M NaCl) results in the formation of DNP double-fibers and bundle-and cablelike twisted side-by-side associates of several of these double-fibers. On the basis of simple cylindrical or ellipsoidal models the sedimentation properties of these structures can be calculated in accordance with the experiment allowing a direct assignment of electron microscopical and hydrodynamic results. Sedimentation measurements in dependence on the ionic strength indicate a redistribution of H1 resulting in the formation of associates at 0.04 M NaCl and of aggregates at higher salt concentration. Double-fibers are present up to physiological salt concentrations.     

The presence of RNA in a double helix inhibits its interaction with histone protein

The binding of core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, H4) to a circular plasmid DNA and to a circular DNA-RNA hybrid molecule of similar size has been compared. Circular hybrid molecules were formed from single stranded fd DNA by synthesis of the complimentary strand with ribonucleotides using wheat germ RNA polymerase II. Upon reconstitution of plasmid DNA circles with histone, the sedimentation profiles of the DNA remained sharp by increased several fold in rate. Material from the peak fractions of these sedimentations appeared to be condensed circular loops of nucleosomes when examined by electron microscopy (EM), and the mass ratio of DNA to histone (at the histone concentrations which produced the fastest sedimentations) was typical of native chromatin. In contrast, the sedimentation behavior of DNA-RNA hybrid circles after addition of histone remained unchanged except for a minor fraction which exhibited a broad and faster sedimentation rate. Examination by EM revealed that most of the molecules appeared identical to protein free hybrid circles while the minor, faster sedimenting fraction appeared to be two or more circles bound together by protein aggregates. Finally, a linear molecule consisting of about 3000 base pairs of duplex DNA covalently joined on both ends to 1500 base pairs of RNA-DNA hybrid helix was constructed. Reconstitution of this molecule with core histone showed nucleosome formation only on the central DNA duplex region. Isopycnic banding of fixed hybrid-histone mixtures showed that little or no histone had bound to the bulk of the full hybrid molecules. We suggest that the presence of RNA in a nucleic acid duplex inhibits the condensation of the duplex into a nucleosomal structure by histone.     

Electron microscopic study of compactization of individual DNA molecules in films during the interaction with histone H1]

The protein-free method was applied for the investigation of histone H1 DNA complexes formation. The main advantage of this method is the possibility to get intramolecular compact structures at interaction of individual spread molecules of DNA with histone H1. It was shown that in the presence of 0.2-5 micrograms/ml of histone H1 in hypophase there are three types of structures on electronmicroscopic preparations: fibres of non-compacted DNA, compact fibres with twisted strands of duplex DNA and compacted rod-like and circular structures where separate fibres of duplex DNA could not be distinguished. The study of compact structures morphology allows to conclude that they are formed by side-by-side association of DNA fibres, as it takes place in the case of triple rings formation at the compactization of circular DNA due to trivaline binding. At increasing ionic strength there is a tendency for transition from second type structures to the third type structures. The latter can be explained by transition from non-cooperative to cooperative binding of histone H1 to DNA.