Site-directed chemical modification of archaeal Thermococcus litoralis Sh1B DNA polymerase: Acquired ability to read through template-strand uracils

We present site-directed chemical modification (SDCM), a tool for engineering U-resistant archaeal DNA polymerases of family B. The Thermococcus litoralis Sh1B DNA polymerase (GenBank: GQ891548) was chosen as the object of the study. Similar to D.Tok, Kod1, Pfu, Tgo and other archaeal members of this family, the T. litoralis Sh1B DNA polymerase is a domain structured, proofreading-proficient enzyme that has the polymerization and 3′→5′ DNA exonucleolytic activities and contains N-terminally located highly conserved template-strand U-binding pocket. The tight binding of template uracil in the enzyme pocket during polymerization blocks the replication of DNA containing uracils. This effect can be alleviated by mutations in key amino acids of the U-binding pocket. We altered T. litoralis Sh1B DNA polymerase's ability to read through the template-strand uracils by applying SDCM. Specific modification of individual cysteine residues in U-binding pocket — targets introduced into certain positions by site-directed mutagenesis — enables the enzyme to effectively replicate DNA containing uracils. We demonstrate that the acquired resistance of chemically modified T. litoralis Sh1B DNA polymerase to DNA uracil correlates with its decreased affinity for template-strand uracil.     

Uracil recognition in archaeal DNA polymerases captured by X-ray crystallography

Archaeal family B DNA polymerases bind tightly to template-strand uracil and stall replication on encountering the pro-mutagenic base. This article describes an X-ray crystal structure, at 2.8 Å resolution, of Thermococcus gorgonarius polymerase in complex with a DNA primer-template containing uracil in the single-stranded region. The DNA backbone is distorted to position the uracil deeply within a pocket, located in the amino-terminal domain of the polymerase. Specificity arises from a combination of hydrogen bonds between the protein backbone and uracil, with the pocket shaped to prevent the stable binding of the four standard DNA bases. Strong interactions are seen with the two phosphates that flank the uracil and the structure gives clues concerning the coupling of uracil binding to the halting of replication. The importance of key amino acids, identified by the analysis of the structure and their conservation between archaeal polymerases, was confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. The crystal structure of V93Q, a polymerase variant that no longer recognises uracil, is also reported, explaining the V93Q phenotype by the steric exclusion of uracil from the pocket.     

Interaction of the family-B DNA polymerase from the archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus with deaminated bases

The interaction of archaeal family B DNA polymerases with deaminated bases has been examined. As determined previously by our group, the polymerase binds tightly to uracil (the deamination product of cytosine), in single-stranded DNA, and stalls replication on encountering this base. DNA polymerisation was also inhibited by the presence of hypoxanthine, the deamination product of adenine. Quantitative binding assays showed that the polymerase bound DNA containing uracil 1.5-4.5-fold more strongly than hypoxanthine and site-directed mutagenesis suggested that the same pocket was used for interaction with both deaminated bases. In contrast the polymerase was insensitive to xanthine, the deamination product of guanine. Traces of uracil and hypoxanthine in DNA can lead to inhibition of the PCR by archaeal DNA polymerases, an important consideration for biotechnology applications. Dual recognition of uracil and hypoxanthine may be facilitated by binding the bases with the glycosidic bond in the anti and syn conformation, respectively.     

Uracil recognition by replicative DNA polymerases is limited to the archaea, not occurring with bacteria and eukarya

Family B DNA polymerases from archaea such as Pyrococcus furiosus, which live at temperatures ~100°C, specifically recognize uracil in DNA templates and stall replication in response to this base. Here it is demonstrated that interaction with uracil is not restricted to hyperthermophilic archaea and that the polymerase from mesophilic Methanosarcina acetivorans shows identical behaviour. The family B DNA polymerases replicate the genomes of archaea, one of the three fundamental domains of life. This publication further shows that the DNA replicating polymerases from the other two domains, bacteria (polymerase III) and eukaryotes (polymerases δ and ε for nuclear DNA and polymerase γ for mitochondrial) are also unable to recognize uracil. Uracil occurs in DNA as a result of deamination of cytosine, either in G:C base-pairs or, more rapidly, in single stranded regions produced, for example, during replication. The resulting G:U mis-pairs/single stranded uracils are promutagenic and, unless repaired, give rise to G:C to A:T transitions in 50% of the progeny. The confinement of uracil recognition to polymerases of the archaeal domain is discussed in terms of the DNA repair pathways necessary for the elimination of uracil.     

Recognition of the pro-mutagenic base uracil by family B DNA polymerases from archaea

Archaeal family B DNA polymerases contain a specialised pocket that binds tightly to template-strand uracil, causing the stalling of DNA replication. The mechanism of this unique "template-strand proof-reading" has been studied using equilibrium binding measurements, DNA footprinting, van't Hoff analysis and calorimetry. Binding assays have shown that the polymerase preferentially binds to uracil in single as opposed to double-stranded DNA. Tightest binding is observed using primer-templates that contain uracil four bases in front of the primer-template junction, corresponding to the observed stalling position. Ethylation interference analysis of primer-templates shows that the two phosphates, immediately flanking the uracil (NpUpN), are important for binding; contacts are also made to phosphates in the primer-strand. Microcalorimetry and van't Hoff analysis have given a fuller understanding of the thermodynamic parameters involved in uracil recognition. All the results are consistent with a "read-ahead" mechanism, in which the replicating polymerase scans the template, ahead of the replication fork, for the presence of uracil and halts polymerisation on detecting this base. Post-stalling events, serving to eliminate uracil, await full elucidation.     

Insights into DNA replication: the crystal structure of DNA polymerase B1 from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus

To minimize the large number of mispairs during genome duplication owing to the large amount of DNA to be synthesized, many replicative polymerases have accessory domains with complementary functions. We describe the crystal structure of replicative DNA polymerase B1 from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Comparison between other known structures indicates that although the protein is folded into the typical N-terminal, editing 3'-5'exonuclease, and C-terminal right-handed polymerase domains, it is characterized by the unusual presence of two extra alpha helices in the N-terminal domain interacting with the fingers helices to form an extended fingers subdomain, a structural feature that can account for some functional features of the protein. We explore the structural basis of specific lesion recognition, the initial step in DNA repair, describing how the N-terminal subdomain pocket of archaeal DNA polymerases could allow specific recognition of deaminated bases such as uracil and hypoxanthine in addition to the typical DNA bases.     

Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the beta-clamp

Y-family DNA polymerases can extend primer strands across template strand lesions that stall replicative polymerases. The poor processivity and fidelity of these enzymes, key to their biological role, requires that their access to the primer-template junction is both facilitated and regulated in order to minimize mutations. These features are believed to be provided by interaction with processivity factors, beta-clamp or proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which are also essential for the function of replicative DNA polymerases. The basis for this interaction is revealed by the crystal structure of the complex between the 'little finger' domain of the Y-family DNA polymerase Pol IV and the beta-clamp processivity factor, both from Escherichia coli. The main interaction involves a C-terminal peptide of Pol IV, and is similar to interactions seen between isolated peptides and other processivity factors. However, this first structure of an entire domain of a binding partner with an assembled clamp reveals a substantial secondary interface, which maintains the polymerase in an inactive orientation, and may regulate the switch between replicative and Y-family DNA polymerases in response to a template strand lesion.     

The hyperthermophilic euryarchaeota Pyrococcus abyssi likely requires the two DNA polymerases D and B for DNA replication

DNA polymerases carry out DNA synthesis during DNA replication, DNA recombination and DNA repair. During the past five years, the number of DNA polymerases in both eukarya and bacteria has increased to at least 19 and multiple biological roles have been assigned to many DNA polymerases. Archaea, the third domain of life, on the other hand, have only a subset of the eukaryotic-like DNA polymerases. The diversity among the archaeal DNA polymerases poses the intriguing question of their functional tasks. Here, we focus on the two identified DNA polymerases, the family B DNA polymerase B (PabpolB) and the family D DNA polymerase D (PabpolD) from the hyperthermophilic euryarchaeota Pyrococcus abyssi. Our data can be summarized as follows: (i) both Pabpols are DNA polymerizing enzymes exclusively; (ii) their DNA binding properties as tested in gel shift competition assays indicated that PabpolD has a preference for a primed template; (iii) PabPolD is a primer-directed DNA polymerase independently of the primer composition whereas PabpolB behaves as an exclusively DNA primer-directed DNA polymerase; (iv) PabPCNA is required for PabpolD to perform efficient DNA synthesis but not PabpolB; (v) PabpolD, but not PabpolB, contains strand displacement activity; (vii) in the presence of PabPCNA, however, both Pabpols D and B show strand displacement activity; and (viii) we show that the direct interaction between PabpolD and PabPCNA is DNA-dependent. Our data imply that PabPolD might play an important role in DNA replication likely together with PabpolB, suggesting that archaea require two DNA polymerases at the replication fork.     

Interaction of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) with the single-stranded template beyond the site of synthesis

Cocrystal structures of DNA polymerases from the Pol I (or A) family have provided only limited information about the location of the single-stranded template beyond the site of nucleotide incorporation, revealing contacts with the templating position and its immediate 5' neighbor. No structural information exists for template residues more remote from the polymerase active site. Using a competition binding assay, we have established that Klenow fragment contacts at least the first four unpaired template nucleotides, though the quantitative contribution of any single contact is relatively small. Photochemical cross-linking indicated that the first unpaired template base beyond the primer terminus is close to Y766, as expected, and the two following template bases are close to F771 on the surface of the fingers subdomain. We have constructed point mutations in the region of the fingers subdomain implicated by these experiments. Cocrystal structures of family A DNA polymerases predict contacts between the template strand and S769, F771, and R841, and our DNA binding assays provide evidence for the functional importance of these contacts. Overall, the data are most consistent with the template strand following a path over the fingers subdomain, close to the side chain of R836 and a neighboring cluster of positively charged residues.     

DNA polymerases and somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes

Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin variable genes, which increases antibody diversity, is initiated by the activation-induced cytosine deaminase (AID) protein. The current DNA-deamination model posits that AID deaminates cytosine to uracil in DNA, and that mutations are generated by DNA polymerases during replication or repair of the uracil residue. Mutations could arise as follows: by DNA replicating past the uracil; by removing the uracil with a uracil glycosylase and replicating past the resulting abasic site with a low-fidelity polymerase; or by repairing the uracil and synthesizing a DNA-repair patch downstream using a low-fidelity polymerase. In this review, we summarize the biochemical properties of specialized DNA polymerases in mammalian cells and discuss their participation in the mechanisms of hypermutation. Many recent studies have examined mice deficient in the genes that encode various DNA polymerases, and have shown that DNA polymerase H (POLH) contributes to hypermutation, whereas POLI, POLK and several other enzymes do not have major roles. The low-fidelity enzyme POLQ has been proposed as another candidate polymerase because it can efficiently bypass abasic sites and recent evidence indicates that it might participate in hypermutation.     

DNA polymerase recognition of 2'-deoxy-2'-fluoroarabinonucleoside 5'-triphosphates (2'F-araNTPs)

We examined the ability of 2'-deoxy-2'-fluroarabinonucleoside 5'-triphosphates (2'F-araNTPs) to serve as substrates of various DNA polymerases. In addition, we also examined the ability of these polymerases to accept DNA-FANA (2'-deoxy-2'-fluoroarabinonucleic acids) chimeras as template strands while synthesizing a DNA or FANA-DNA complementary strand. We provide preliminary data demonstrating that 2'F-araNTPs are indeed substrates of several DNA polymerases, and that FANA-DNA chimeric templates are generally well recognized by these polymerase enzymes.     

Discrimination against the cytosine analog tC by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV DinB

The cytosine analog 1,3-diaza-2-oxophenothiazine (tC) is a fluorescent nucleotide that forms Watson-Crick base pairs with dG. The Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (an A-family polymerase) can efficiently bypass tC on the template strand and incorporate deoxyribose-triphosphate-tC into the growing primer terminus. Y-family DNA polymerases are known for their ability to accommodate bulky lesions and modified bases and to replicate beyond such nonstandard DNA structures in a process known as translesion synthesis. We probed the ability of the Escherichia coli Y-family DNA polymerase DinB (Pol IV) to copy DNA containing tC and to incorporate tC into a growing DNA strand. DinB selectively adds dGTP across from tC in template DNA but cannot extend beyond the newly formed G:tC base pair. However, we find that DinB incorporates the tC deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate opposite template G and extends from tC. Therefore, DinB displays asymmetry in terms of its ability to discriminate against the modification of the DNA template compared to the incoming nucleotide. In addition, our finding that DinB (a lesion-bypass DNA polymerase) specifically discriminates against tC in the template strand may suggest that DinB discriminates against template modifications in the major groove of DNA.     

Processing of DNA lesions by archaeal DNA polymerases from Sulfolobus solfataricus

Spontaneous damage to DNA as a result of deamination, oxidation and depurination is greatly accelerated at high temperatures. Hyperthermophilic microorganisms constantly exposed to temperatures exceeding 80°C are endowed with powerful DNA repair mechanisms to maintain genome stability. Of particular interest is the processing of DNA lesions during replication, which can result in fixed mutations. The hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus has two functional DNA polymerases, PolB1 and PolY1. We have found that the replicative DNA polymerase PolB1 specifically recognizes the presence of the deaminated bases hypoxanthine and uracil in the template by stalling DNA polymerization 3–4 bases upstream of these lesions and strongly associates with oligonucleotides containing them. PolB1 also stops at 8-oxoguanine and is unable to bypass an abasic site in the template. PolY1 belongs to the family of lesion bypass DNA polymerases and readily bypasses hypoxanthine, uracil and 8-oxoguanine, but not an abasic site, in the template. The specific recognition of deaminated bases by PolB1 may represent an initial step in their repair while PolY1 may be involved in damage tolerance at the replication fork. Additionally, we reveal that the deaminated bases can be introduced into DNA enzymatically, since both PolB1 and PolY1 are able to incorporate the aberrant DNA precursors dUTP and dITP.     

B family DNA polymerases asymmetrically recognize pyrimidines and purines

We utilized a series of pyrimidine analogues modified at O(2), N-3, and N(4)/O(4) to determine if two B family DNA polymerases, human DNA polymerase α and herpes simplex virus I DNA polymerase, choose whether to polymerize pyrimidine dNTPs using the same mechanisms they use for purine dNTPs. Removing O(2) of a pyrimidine dNTP vastly decreased the level of incorporation by these enzymes and also compromised fidelity in the case of C analogues, while removing O(2) from the templating base had more modest effects. Removing the Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding groups of N-3 and N(4)/O(4) greatly impaired polymerization, both of the resulting dNTP analogues and of natural dNTPs opposite these pyrimidine analogues when present in the template strand. Thus, the Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding groups of a pyrimidine clearly play an important role in enhancing correct dNTP polymerization but are not essential for preventing misincorporation. These studies also indicate that DNA polymerases recognize bases extremely asymmetrically, both in terms of whether they are a purine or pyrimidine and whether they are in the template or are the incoming dNTP. The mechanistic implications of these results with regard to how polymerases discriminate between right and wrong dNTPs are discussed.     

Evaluation of the role of the vaccinia virus uracil DNA glycosylase and A20 proteins as intrinsic components of the DNA polymerase holoenzyme

The vaccinia virus DNA polymerase is inherently distributive but acquires processivity by associating with a heterodimeric processivity factor comprised of the viral A20 and D4 proteins. D4 is also an enzymatically active uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG). The presence of an active repair protein as an essential component of the polymerase holoenzyme is a unique feature of the replication machinery. We have shown previously that the A20-UDG complex has a stoichiometry of ～1:1, and our data suggest that A20 serves as a bridge between polymerase and UDG. Here we show that conserved hydrophobic residues in the N' terminus of A20 are important for its binding to UDG. Our data argue against the assembly of D4 into higher order multimers, suggesting that the processivity factor does not form a toroidal ring around the DNA. Instead, we hypothesize that the intrinsic, processive DNA scanning activity of UDG tethers the holoenzyme to the DNA template. The inclusion of UDG as an essential holoenzyme component suggests that replication and base excision repair may be coupled. Here we show that the DNA polymerase can utilize dUTP as a substrate in vitro. Moreover, uracil moieties incorporated into the nascent strand during holoenzyme-mediated DNA synthesis can be excised by the viral UDG present within this holoenzyme, leaving abasic sites. Finally, we show that the polymerase stalls upon encountering an abasic site in the template strand, indicating that, like many replicative polymerases, the poxviral holoenzyme cannot perform translesion synthesis across an abasic site.     

Factor C from rabbit liver. A new poly(dC) and poly[d(G-C)] template-selective stimulatory protein of DNA polymerases

We have undertaken a search for mammalian DNA-binding proteins that enhance the activity of DNA polymerases in a template sequence-specific fashion. In this paper, we report the extensive purification and characterization of a new DNA-binding protein from rabbit liver that selectively stimulates DNA polymerases to copy synthetic poly[d(G-C)] and the poly(dC) strand of poly(dC).poly(dG) as well as single-stranded natural DNA that contains stretches of oligo(dC). The enhancing protein, a polypeptide of 65 kDa designated factor C, stimulates the copying of the two synthetic templates by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, Micrococcus luteus polymerase, and eukaryotic DNA polymerases alpha and beta, but not by avian myeloblastosis virus polymerase. Factor C, however, does not affect utilization by these polymerases of the poly(dG) strand of poly(dC).poly(dG), of poly(dC) primed by oligo(dG), or of poly(dA).poly(dT) and poly[d(A-T)]. With polymerase I, Michaelis constants (Km) of poly[d(G-C)] and of the poly(dC) strand of poly(dC).poly(dG) are decreased by factor C 37- and 4.7-fold, respectively, whereas maximum velocity (Vmax) remains unchanged. By contrast, neither the Km value of the poly(dG) strand of poly(dC).poly(dG) nor the Vmax value with this template is altered by factor C. Rates of copying of activated DNA, denatured DNA, or singly primed M13 DNA are not affected significantly by factor C. However, primer extension analysis of the copying of recombinant M13N4 DNA that contains runs of oligo(dC) within an inserted thymidine kinase gene shows that factor C increases processivity by specifically augmenting the efficiency at which polymerase I traverses the oligo(dC) stretches. Direct binding of factor C to denatured DNA is indicated by retention of the protein-DNA complex on columns of DEAE-cellulose. Binding of factor C to poly[d(G-C)] is demonstrated by the specific adsorption of the enhancing protein to columns of poly[d(G-C)]-Sepharose. We propose that by binding to poly[d(G-C)] and to poly(dC).poly(dG), factor C enables tighter binding of some DNA polymerases to these templates and facilitates enzymatic activity.     

Unwinding of primer-templates by archaeal family-B DNA polymerases in response to template-strand uracil

Archaeal family-B DNA polymerases bind tightly to deaminated bases and stall replication on encountering uracil in template strands, four bases ahead of the primer-template junction. Should the polymerase progress further towards the uracil, for example, to position uracil only two bases in front of the junction, 3′–5′ proof-reading exonuclease activity becomes stimulated, trimming the primer and re-setting uracil to the +4 position. Uracil sensing prevents copying of the deaminated base and permanent mutation in 50% of the progeny. This publication uses both steady-state and time-resolved 2-aminopurine fluorescence to show pronounced unwinding of primer-templates with Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) polymerase–DNA complexes containing uracil at +2; much less strand separation is seen with uracil at +4. DNA unwinding has long been recognized as necessary for proof-reading exonuclease activity. The roles of M247 and Y261, amino acids suggested by structural studies to play a role in primer-template unwinding, have been probed. M247 appears to be unimportant, but 2-aminopurine fluorescence measurements show that Y261 plays a role in primer-template strand separation. Y261 is also required for full exonuclease activity and contributes to the fidelity of the polymerase.     

Crystal structure of a DinB family error-prone DNA polymerase from Sulfolobus solfataricus.

A new group of error-prone DNA polymerases overcomes the blockage posed to normal DNA replication by damaged template bases, suggesting an active site with a loose, flexible pocket that accommodates aberrant DNA structures. We have determined a 2.8 A resolution crystal structure of the Sulfolobus solfataricus Dbh protein, a DNA translesion polymerase closely related to Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV and human polymerase kappa. A high error rate is observed for the Dbh polymerase in a range of 10(-2)-10(-3) for all 12 base substitution mispairs. The crystal structure of Dbh reveals an overall architecture resembling other DNA polymerases but has unique features that are likely to contribute to error-prone synthesis, including -1 frameshifting mutations.     

Accuracy, lesion bypass, strand displacement and translocation by DNA polymerases

The structures of DNA polymerases from different families show common features and significant differences that shed light on the ability of these enzymes to accurately copy DNA and translocate. The structure of a B family DNA polymerase from phage RB69 exhibits an active-site closing conformational change in the fingers domain upon forming a ternary complex with primer template in deoxynucleoside triphosphate. The rotation of the fingers domain alpha-helices by 60 degrees upon dNTP binding is analogous to the changes seen in other families of polymerases. When the 3' terminus is bound to the editing 3' exonuclease active site, the orientation of the DNA helix axis changes by 40 degrees and the thumb domain re-orients with the DNA. Structures of substrate and product complexes of T7 RNA polymerase, a structural homologue of T7 DNA polymerase, show that family polymerases use the rotation conformational change of the fingers domain to translocate down the DNA. The fingers opening rotation that results in translocation is powered by the release of the product pyrophosphate and also enables the Pol I family polymerases to function as a helicase in displacing the downstream non-template strand from the template strand.