Antibody-Mediated Immobilization of Cryptococcus neoformans Promotes Biofilm Formation

Most microbes, including the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans, can grow as biofilms. Biofilms confer upon microbes a range of characteristics, including an ability to colonize materials such as shunts and catheters and increased resistance to antibiotics. Here, we provide evidence that coating surfaces with a monoclonal antibody to glucuronoxylomannan, the major component of the fungal capsular polysaccharide, immobilizes cryptococcal cells to a surface support and, subsequently, promotes biofilm formation. We used time-lapse microscopy to visualize the growth of cryptococcal biofilms, generating the first movies of fungal biofilm growth. We show that when fungal cells are immobilized using surface-attached specific antibody to the capsule, the initial stages of biofilm formation are significantly faster than those on surfaces with no antibody coating or surfaces coated with unspecific monoclonal antibody. Time-lapse microscopy revealed that biofilm growth was a dynamic process in which cells shuffled position during budding and was accompanied by emergence of planktonic variant cells that left the attached biofilm community. The planktonic variant cells exhibited mobility, presumably by Brownian motion. Our results indicate that microbial immobilization by antibody capture hastens biofilm formation and suggest that antibody coating of medical devices with immunoglobulins must exclude binding to common pathogenic microbes and the possibility that this effect could be exploited in industrial microbiology.Cryptococcus neoformans is a fungal pathogen that is ubiquitous in the environment and enters the body via the inhalation of airborne particles. The C. neoformans cell is surrounded by a layer of polysaccharide that consists predominantly of glucuronoxylomannan (GXM), which forms a protective capsule around the microbe. The capsule has been shown to be essential for virulence in murine models of infection (5-7) and, thus, is considered a key virulence factor. C. neoformans is the causative agent of cryptococcosis, a disease that primarily affects individuals with impaired immune systems, and is a significant problem in AIDS patients (21, 31). The most common manifestation of cryptococcosis is meningoencephalitis.Biofilms are communities of microbes that are attached to surfaces and held together by an extracellular matrix, often consisting predominantly of polysaccharides (8, 10). A great deal is known about bacterial biofilms (3, 9, 24, 30), but fungal biofilm formation is much less studied. Candida albicans is known to synthesize biofilms (11, 28, 29), as is C. neoformans. Biofilm-like structures consisting of innumerable cryptococcal cells encased in a polysaccharide matrix have been reported in human cases of cryptococcosis (32). Biofilm formation confers upon the microbe the capacity for drug resistance, and microbial cells in biofilms are less susceptible to host defense mechanisms (2, 4, 9, 12). In this regard, cells within C. neoformans biofilms are significantly less susceptible to caspofungin and amphotericin B than are planktonic cells (19). The cells within the biofilm are also resistant to the actions of fluconazole and voriconazole and various microbial oxidants and peptides (17, 19).Bacterial and fungal biofilms form readily on prosthetic materials, which poses a tremendous risk of chronic infection (10, 13, 15, 27). C. neoformans biofilms can form on a range of surfaces, including glass, polystyrene, and polyvinyl, and material devices, such as catheters (16). C. neoformans can form biofilms on the ventriculoatrial shunts used to decompress intracerebral pressure in patients with cryptococcal meningoencephalitis (32).The polysaccharide capsule of C. neoformans is essential for biofilm formation (18), and biofilm formation involves the shedding and accumulation of large amounts of GXM into the biofilm extracellular matrix (16). Previously, we reported that antibody to GXM in solution could inhibit biofilm formation through a process that presumably involves interference with polysaccharide shedding (18, 20). However, the effect of antibody-mediated immobilization of C. neoformans cells on cryptococcal biofilm formation has not been explored. In this paper, we report that the monoclonal antibody (MAb) 18B7, which is specific for the capsular polysaccharide GXM, can capture and immobilize C. neoformans to surfaces, a process that promotes biofilm formation. Interestingly, we identified planktonic variant C. neoformans cells that appeared to escape from the biofilm, but whose functions are not known. The results provide new insights on biofilm formation.     

Conjugative Plasmid Transfer and Adhesion Dynamics in an Escherichia coli Biofilm

A conjugative plasmid from the catheter-associated urinary tract infection strain Escherichia coli MS2027 was sequenced and annotated. This 42,644-bp plasmid, designated pMAS2027, contains 58 putative genes and is most closely related to plasmids belonging to incompatibility group X (IncX1). Plasmid pMAS2027 encodes two important virulence factors: type 3 fimbriae and a type IV secretion (T4S) system. Type 3 fimbriae, recently found to be functionally expressed in E. coli, played an important role in biofilm formation. Biofilm formation by E. coli MS2027 was specifically due to expression of type 3 fimbriae and not the T4S system. The T4S system, however, accounted for the conjugative ability of pMAS2027 and enabled a non-biofilm-forming strain to grow as part of a mixed biofilm following acquisition of this plasmid. Thus, the importance of conjugation as a mechanism to spread biofilm determinants was demonstrated. Conjugation may represent an important mechanism by which type 3 fimbria genes are transferred among the Enterobacteriaceae that cause device-related infections in nosocomial settings.Bacterial biofilms are complex communities of bacterial cells living in close association with a surface (17). Bacterial cells in these protected environments are often resistant to multiple factors, including antimicrobials, changes in the pH, oxygen radicals, and host immune defenses (19, 38). Biofilm formation is a property of many bacterial species, and a range of molecular mechanisms that facilitate this process have been described (2, 3, 11, 14, 16, 29, 33, 34). Often, the ability to form a biofilm is dependent on the production of adhesins on the bacterial cell surface. In Escherichia coli, biofilm formation is enhanced by the production of certain types of fimbriae (e.g., type 1 fimbriae, type 3 fimbriae, F1C, F9, curli, and conjugative pili) (14, 23, 25, 29, 33, 39, 46), cell surface adhesins (e.g., autotransporter proteins such as antigen 43, AidA, TibA, EhaA, and UpaG) (21, 34, 35, 40, 43), and flagella (22, 45).The close proximity of bacterial cells in biofilms creates an environment conducive for the exchange of genetic material. Indeed, plasmid-mediated conjugation in monospecific and mixed E. coli biofilms has been demonstrated (6, 18, 24, 31). The F plasmid represents the best-characterized conjugative system for biofilm formation by E. coli. The F pilus mediates adhesion to abiotic surfaces and stabilizes the biofilm structure through cell-cell interactions (16, 30). Many other conjugative plasmids also contribute directly to biofilm formation upon derepression of the conjugative function (16).One example of a conjugative system employed by gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae is the type 4 secretion (T4S) system. The T4S system is a multisubunit structure that spans the cell envelope and contains a secretion channel often linked to a pilus or other surface filament or protein (8). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB-VirD4 system is the archetypical T4S system and is encoded by 11 genes in the virB operon and one gene (virD4) in the virD operon (7, 8). Genes with strong homology to genes in the virB operon have also been identified on other conjugative plasmids. For example, the pilX1 to pilX11 genes on the E. coli R6K IncX plasmid and the virB1 to virB11 genes are highly conserved at the nucleotide level (28).We recently described identification and characterization of the mrk genes encoding type 3 fimbriae in a uropathogenic strain of E. coli isolated from a patient with a nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) (29). The mrk genes were located on a conjugative plasmid (pMAS2027) and were strongly associated with biofilm formation. In this study we determined the entire sequence of plasmid pMAS2027 and revealed the presence of conjugative transfer genes homologous to the pilX1 to pilX11 genes of E. coli R6K (in addition to the mrk genes). We show here that biofilm formation is driven primarily by type 3 fimbriae and that the T4S apparatus is unable to mediate biofilm growth in the absence of the mrk genes. Finally, we demonstrate that conjugative transfer of pMAS2027 within a mixed biofilm confers biofilm formation properties on recipient cells due to acquisition of the type 3 fimbria-encoding mrk genes.     

Increased Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli in Mature Biofilms

Biofilms are considered to be highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this high resistance of biofilms, including restricted penetration of antimicrobial agents into biofilms, slow growth owing to nutrient limitation, expression of genes involved in the general stress response, and emergence of a biofilm-specific phenotype. However, since combinations of these factors are involved in most biofilm studies, it is still difficult to fully understand the mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antibiotics. In this study, the antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli cells in biofilms was investigated with exclusion of the effects of the restricted penetration of antimicrobial agents into biofilms and the slow growth owing to nutrient limitation. Three different antibiotics, ampicillin (100 μg/ml), kanamycin (25 μg/ml), and ofloxacin (10 μg/ml), were applied directly to cells in the deeper layers of mature biofilms that developed in flow cells after removal of the surface layers of the biofilms. The results of the antibiotic treatment analyses revealed that ofloxacin and kanamycin were effective against biofilm cells, whereas ampicillin did not kill the cells, resulting in regrowth of the biofilm after the ampicillin treatment was discontinued. LIVE/DEAD staining revealed that a small fraction of resistant cells emerged in the deeper layers of the mature biofilms and that these cells were still alive even after 24 h of ampicillin treatment. Furthermore, to determine which genes in the biofilm cells are induced, allowing increased resistance to ampicillin, global gene expression was analyzed at different stages of biofilm formation, the attachment, colony formation, and maturation stages. The results showed that significant changes in gene expression occurred during biofilm formation, which were partly induced by rpoS expression. Based on the experimental data, it is likely that the observed resistance of biofilms can be attributed to formation of ampicillin-resistant subpopulations in the deeper layers of mature biofilms but not in young colony biofilms and that the production and resistance of the subpopulations were aided by biofilm-specific phenotypes, like slow growth and induction of rpoS-mediated stress responses.Reduced susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to antimicrobial agents is a crucial problem for treatment of chronic infections (11, 29, 48). It has been estimated that 65% of microbial infections are associated with biofilms (11, 29, 37), and biofilm cells are 100 to 1,000 times more resistant to antimicrobial agents than planktonic bacterial cells (11, 29, 32).The molecular nature of this apparent resistance has not been elucidated well, and a number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain the reduced susceptibility, such as restricted antibiotic penetration (47), decreased growth rates and metabolism (7, 52), quorum sensing and induction of a biofilm-specific phenotype (8, 29, 35, 39, 49), stress response activation (7, 52), and an increase in expression of efflux pumps (14). Biofilm resistance has generally been assumed to be due to the fact that the cells in the deeper layers of thick biofilms, which grow more slowly, have less access to antibiotics and nutrients. However, this is not the only reason in many cases. Familiar mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, such as modifying enzymes and target mutations, do not seem to be responsible for the biofilm resistance. Even sensitive bacteria that do not have a known genetic basis for resistance can exhibit profoundly reduced susceptibility when they form biofilms (48).It was reported previously that changes in gene expression induced a biofilm-specific phenotype (5, 13, 22, 35, 41, 42). Several genes have been proposed to be particularly important for biofilm formation, and the importance of the rpoS gene in Escherichia coli biofilm formation was suggested recently (1, 10, 22, 42). It has been suggested that induction of an rpoS-mediated stress response results in physiological changes that could contribute to antibiotic resistance (29). Although several mechanisms and genes have been proposed to explain biofilm resistance to antibiotics, this resistance is not still fully understood because these mechanisms seem to work together within a biofilm community. In addition, the physiology of biofilm cells is remarkably heterogeneous and varies according to the location of individual cells within biofilms (33, 34, 46).In this study, susceptibility of E. coli cells in biofilms to antibiotics was investigated. The E. coli cells in the deeper layers of mature biofilms were directly treated with three antibiotics with different molecular targets, the β-lactam ampicillin, the aminoglycoside kanamycin, and the fluoroquinolone ofloxacin. The biofilm biomass was removed before antibiotic treatment, and only the cells located in the deeper layers of the mature biofilms were directly exposed to antibiotics; thus, the effects of restricted antibiotic and nutrient penetration, as well as heterogeneous physiological states in biofilms, were reduced. Although ofloxacin and kanamycin effectively killed the biofilm cells, ampicillin could not kill the cells, which led to regrowth of biofilms. However, the cells in young colony biofilms were completely killed by ampicillin. Therefore, to determine which genes are induced in the mature biofilm cells, allowing increased resistance to ampicillin, global gene expression was analyzed at different stages of biofilm formation, the attachment, colony formation, and maturation stages. Based on the experimental data obtained, possible mechanisms of the increased biofilm resistance to ampicillin are discussed below.     

Flagellated but Not Hyperfimbriated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Attaches to and Forms Biofilms on Cholesterol-Coated Surfaces

The asymptomatic, chronic carrier state of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi occurs in the bile-rich gallbladder and is frequently associated with the presence of cholesterol gallstones. We have previously demonstrated that salmonellae form biofilms on human gallstones and cholesterol-coated surfaces in vitro and that bile-induced biofilm formation on cholesterol gallstones promotes gallbladder colonization and maintenance of the carrier state. Random transposon mutants of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium were screened for impaired adherence to and biofilm formation on cholesterol-coated Eppendorf tubes but not on glass and plastic surfaces. We identified 49 mutants with this phenotype. The results indicate that genes involved in flagellum biosynthesis and structure primarily mediated attachment to cholesterol. Subsequent analysis suggested that the presence of the flagellar filament enhanced binding and biofilm formation in the presence of bile, while flagellar motility and expression of type 1 fimbriae were unimportant. Purified Salmonella flagellar proteins used in a modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) showed that FliC was the critical subunit mediating binding to cholesterol. These studies provide a better understanding of early events during biofilm development, specifically how salmonellae bind to cholesterol, and suggest a target for therapies that may alleviate biofilm formation on cholesterol gallstones and the chronic carrier state.The serovars of Salmonella enterica are diverse, infect a broad array of hosts, and cause significant morbidity and mortality in impoverished and industrialized nations worldwide. S. enterica serovar Typhi is the etiologic agent of typhoid fever, a severe illness characterized by sustained bacteremia and a delayed onset of symptoms that afflicts approximately 20 million people each year (14, 19). Serovar Typhi can establish a chronic infection of the human gallbladder, suggesting that this bacterium utilizes novel mechanisms to mediate enhanced colonization and persistence in a bile-rich environment.There is a strong correlation between gallbladder abnormalities, particularly gallstones, and development of the asymptomatic Salmonella carrier state (47). Antibiotic regimens are typically ineffective in carriers with gallstones (47), and these patients have an 8.47-fold-higher risk of developing hepatobiliary carcinomas (28, 46, 91). Elimination of chronic infections usually requires gallbladder removal (47), but surgical intervention is cost-prohibitive in developing countries where serovar Typhi is prevalent. Thus, understanding the progression of infection to the carrier state and developing alternative treatment options are of critical importance to human health.The formation of biofilms on gallstones has been hypothesized to facilitate enhanced colonization of and persistence in the gallbladder. Over the past 2 decades, bacterial biofilms have been increasingly implicated as burdens for food and public safety worldwide, and they are broadly defined as heterogeneous communities of microorganisms that adhere to each other and to inert or live surfaces (17, 22, 67, 89, 102). A sessile environment provides selective advantages in natural, medical, and industrial ecosystems for diverse species of commensal and pathogenic bacteria, including Streptococcus mutans (40, 92, 104), Staphylococcus aureus (15, 35, 100), Escherichia coli (21, 74), Vibrio cholerae (39, 52, 107), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23, 58, 73, 105). Bacterial biofilms are increasingly associated with many chronic infections in humans and exhibit heightened resistance to commonly administered antibiotics and to engulfment by professional phagocytes (54, 55, 59). The bacterial gene expression profiles for planktonic and biofilm phenotypes differ (42, 90), and the changes are likely regulated by external stimuli, including nutrient availability, the presence of antimicrobials, and the composition of the binding substrate.Biofilm formation occurs in sequential, highly ordered stages and begins with attachment of free-swimming, planktonic bacteria to a surface. Subsequent biofilm maturation is characterized by the production of a self-initiated extracellular matrix (ECM) composed of nucleic acid, proteins, or exopolysaccharides (EPS) that encase the community of microorganisms. Planktonic cells are continuously shed from the sessile, matrix-bound population, which can result in reattachment and fortification of the biofilm or systemic infection and release of the organism into the environment. Shedding of serovar Typhi by asymptomatic carriers can contaminate food and water and account for much of the person-to-person transmission in underdeveloped countries.Our laboratory has previously reported that bile is required for formation of mature biofilms with characteristic EPS production by S. enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis, and Typhi on human gallstones and cholesterol-coated Eppendorf tubes (18, 78). Cholesterol is the primary constituent of human cholesterol gallstones, and use of cholesterol-coated tubes creates an in vitro uniform surface that mimics human gallstones (18). It was also demonstrated that Salmonella biofilms that formed on different surfaces had unique phenotypes and required expression of specific EPS (18, 77), yet the factors mediating Salmonella binding to gallstones and cholesterol-coated surfaces during the initiation of biofilm formation remain unknown. Here, we show that the presence of serovar Typhimurium flagella promotes binding specifically to cholesterol in the early stages of biofilm development and that the FliC subunit is a critical component. Bound salmonellae expressing intact flagella provided a scaffold for other cells to bind to during later stages of biofilm growth. Elucidation of key mechanisms that mediate adherence to cholesterol during Salmonella bile-induced biofilm formation on gallstone surfaces promises to reveal novel drug targets for alleviating biofilm formation in chronic cases.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Evolution of Diversity in Spatially Structured Escherichia coli Populations

The stochastic Ricker population model was used to investigate the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity in a bacterial population grown in a spatially structured environment. In particular, we showed that Escherichia coli undergoes dramatic genetic diversification when grown as a biofilm. Using a novel biofilm entrapment method, we retrieved 64 clones from each of six different depths of a mature biofilm, and after subculturing for ∼30 generations, we measured their growth kinetics in three different media. We fit a stochastic Ricker population growth model to the recorded growth curves. The growth kinetics of clonal lineages descendant from cells sampled at different biofilm depths varied as a function of both the depth in the biofilm and the growth medium used. We concluded that differences in the growth dynamics of clones were heritable and arose during adaptive evolution under local conditions in a spatially heterogeneous environment. We postulate that under nutrient-limited conditions, selective sweeps would be protracted and would be insufficient to purge less-fit variants, a phenomenon that would allow the coexistence of genetically distinct clones. These findings contribute to the current understanding of biofilm ecology and complement current hypotheses for the maintenance and generation of microbial diversity in spatially structured environments.The mechanisms that lead to the genesis and maintenance of diversity in communities have intrigued geneticists and ecologists alike for decades (6, 17, 27, 33, 39, 49). This is particularly challenging for microbial communities, in which ecological and evolutionary processes occur on roughly the same time scale (3, 16, 38) and where the outcome of these processes may be affected by the spatial structure in which these communities grow.Bacterial biofilms are examples of spatially structured communities that have been the subject of intense research in medical and engineering contexts in recent years (3, 8, 20, 48, 56). Previous work has shown that the phenotypic characteristics of bacterial populations in biofilms are distinct from those of their free-swimming counterparts (8). These bacterial assemblages form physically and chemically heterogeneous structures (20) whose complex architecture strongly influences mass transfer (56). This results in the formation of steep gradients of nutrients, waste products, pH, redox potential, and electron acceptors, which results in the creation of distinct and perhaps unique niches on a microscale. This places selective pressure on variants that have enhanced fitness and are well adapted to local conditions. From a theoretical perspective, this would be expected to increase genetic diversity within a population by precluding competitive exclusion, yet this has not previously been demonstrated empirically.The degree of diversification that occurs within populations growing in biofilms is not well understood, nor are the spatial and temporal dynamics of bacterial species succession in biofilms. However, it is known that the physical and chemical heterogeneity of microbial biofilms has profound effects on microbial growth and activity. Most bacterial cells in biofilms are not highly active and grow slowly if at all. For example, active protein synthesis occurs only in the uppermost zone (32 ± 3 μm) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms (4). Likewise, in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilms, fast growth occurs near the interface of the biofilm and bulk fluid, and cells inside the biofilm show little growth (55). The near absence of growth in interior regions of biofilms may lead to an increased tempo of diversification, since numerous studies have shown that mutation frequencies are elevated in slowly growing cells (28). If this occurs within a biofilm, then clones might exhibit a high genotypic variability that could have significant practical implications in terms of yielding spontaneous mutants that are resistant to antimicrobial agents.Experimental evolution has contributed greatly to our understanding of the causes and consequences of genetic diversity in populations (reviewed in references 23, 29, and 42). Initially, research focused on characterizing diversity within populations that evolved in spatially homogenous environments (e.g., chemostat and batch systems) (13, 15, 19, 30-32, 45, 47, 50-53). Several studies have highlighted a role for spatial heterogeneity in the emergence and maintenance of genetic diversity (25, 26, 43). Korona and colleagues (25, 26) compared populations that evolved in batch cultures to populations that evolved with a spatial structure and demonstrated that phenotypic diversity was greatest with spatial structure. In other work, Rainey and Travisano (43) showed that populations of Pseudomonas grown in static broth microcosms diversified so that some ecotypes occupied a floating biofilm on the surface of the broth while others occupied the liquid phase or glass surface of the culture. Boles et al. (2, 3) investigated the extent of diversification of Pseudomonas using biofilms that evolved in flow-cell systems. They reported that genetic changes produced by a recA-dependent mechanism affected multiple traits, with some biofilm-derived variants being better able to disseminate while others were better able to form biofilms (3). Further study showed that in some cells, endogenous oxidative stress caused double-stranded DNA breaks that when repaired by recombinatorial DNA repair genes gave rise to mutations (2). These previous studies demonstrate the pivotal role of spatial structure in the generation and maintenance of diversity in evolving bacterial populations.In this study, we extended this work by using novel techniques to characterize diversity in Escherichia coli biofilms that allowed us to recover clones from specific depths within a biofilm. The growth kinetics of clones from six different biofilm depths were measured and modeled using an analysis-of-variance formulation of the stochastic Ricker model of population dynamics with environmental noise (11, 40). Rigorous statistical methods were used to show that after 1 month of cultivation, the extant diversity in E. coli biofilms was extraordinarily high and varied with depth.     

Inactivation of Vibrio anguillarum by Attached and Planktonic Roseobacter Cells

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the inhibition of Vibrio by Roseobacter in a combined liquid-surface system. Exposure of Vibrio anguillarum to surface-attached roseobacters (10⁷ CFU/cm²) resulted in significant reduction or complete killing of the pathogen inoculated at 10² to 10⁴ CFU/ml. The effect was likely associated with the production of tropodithietic acid (TDA), as a TDA-negative mutant did not affect survival or growth of V. anguillarum.Antagonistic interactions among marine bacteria are well documented, and secretion of antagonistic compounds is common among bacteria that colonize particles or surfaces (8, 13, 16, 21, 31). These marine bacteria may be interesting as sources for new antimicrobial drugs or as probiotic bacteria for aquaculture.Aquaculture is a rapidly growing sector, but outbreaks of bacterial diseases are a limiting factor and pose a threat, especially to young fish and invertebrates that cannot be vaccinated. Because regular or prophylactic administration of antibiotics must be avoided, probiotic bacteria are considered an alternative (9, 18, 34, 38, 39, 40). Several microorganisms have been able to reduce bacterial diseases in challenge trials with fish or fish larvae (14, 24, 25, 27, 33, 37, 39, 40). One example is Phaeobacter strain 27-4 (17), which inhibits Vibrio anguillarum and reduces mortality in turbot larvae (27). The antagonism of Phaeobacter 27-4 and the closely related Phaeobacter inhibens is due mainly to the sulfur-containing tropolone derivative tropodithietic acid (TDA) (2, 5), which is also produced by other Phaeobacter strains and Ruegeria mobilis (28). Phaeobacter and Ruegeria strains or their DNA has been commonly found in marine larva-rearing sites (6, 17, 28).Phaeobacter and Ruegeria (Alphaproteobacteria, Roseobacter clade) are efficient surface colonizers (7, 11, 31, 36). They are abundant in coastal and eutrophic zones and are often associated with algae (3, 7, 41). Surface-attached Phaeobacter bacteria may play an important role in determining the species composition of an emerging biofilm, as even low densities of attached Phaeobacter strain SK2.10 bacteria can prevent other marine organisms from colonizing solid surfaces (30, 32).In continuation of the previous research on roseobacters as aquaculture probiotics, the purpose of this study was to determine the antagonistic potential of Phaeobacter and Ruegeria against Vibrio anguillarum in liquid systems that mimic a larva-rearing environment. Since production of TDA in liquid marine broth appears to be highest when roseobacters form an air-liquid biofilm (5), we addressed whether they could be applied as biofilms on solid surfaces.     

Interactions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles

The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms. Biofilm-derived membrane vesicles (MVs) and DNA, both matrix components, demonstrated concentration-, pH-, and cation-dependent interactions. Furthermore, MV-DNA association influenced MV surface properties. This bears consequences for the reactivity and availability for interaction of matrix polymers and other constituents.The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms and is crucial for the development of fundamental biofilm properties (46, 47). Early studies defined polysaccharides as the matrix component, but proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are all now acknowledged as important contributors (7, 15). Indeed, DNA has emerged as a vital participant, fulfilling structural and functional roles (1, 5, 6, 19, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44). The phosphodiester bond of DNA renders this polyanionic at a physiological pH, undoubtedly contributing to interactions with cations, humic substances, fine-dispersed minerals, and matrix entities (25, 41, 49).In addition to particulates such as flagella and pili, membrane vesicles (MVs) are also found within the matrices of gram-negative and mixed biofilms (3, 16, 40). MVs are multifunctional bilayered structures that bleb from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (reviewed in references 4, 24, 27, 28, and 30) and are chemically heterogeneous, combining the known chemistries of the biofilm matrix. Examination of biofilm samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has suggested that matrix material interacts with MVs (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Since MVs produced in planktonic culture have associated DNA (11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 30, 39, 48), could biofilm-derived MVs incorporate DNA (1, 39, 40, 44)?Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Possible interactions between matrix polymers and particulate structures. Shown is an electron micrograph of a thin section through a P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. During processing, some dehydration occurred, resulting in collapse of matrix material into fibrillate arrangements (black filled arrows). There is a suggestion of interactions occurring with particulate structures such as MVs (hollow white arrow) and flagella (filled white arrows) (identified by the appearance and cross-dimension of these highly ordered structures when viewed at high magnification), which was consistently observed with other embedded samples and also with whole-mount preparations of gently disrupted biofilms (data not shown). The scale bar represents 200 nm.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

New Device for High-Throughput Viability Screening of Flow Biofilms

Control of biofilms requires rapid methods to identify compounds effective against them and to isolate resistance-compromised mutants for identifying genes involved in enhanced biofilm resistance. While rapid screening methods for microtiter plate well (“static”) biofilms are available, there are no methods for such screening of continuous flow biofilms (“flow biofilms”). Since the latter biofilms more closely approximate natural biofilms, development of a high-throughput (HTP) method for screening them is desirable. We describe here a new method using a device comprised of microfluidic channels and a distributed pneumatic pump (BioFlux) that provides fluid flow to 96 individual biofilms. This device allows fine control of continuous or intermittent fluid flow over a broad range of flow rates, and the use of a standard well plate format provides compatibility with plate readers. We show that use of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing bacteria, staining with propidium iodide, and measurement of fluorescence with a plate reader permit rapid and accurate determination of biofilm viability. The biofilm viability measured with the plate reader agreed with that determined using plate counts, as well as with the results of fluorescence microscope image analysis. Using BioFlux and the plate reader, we were able to rapidly screen the effects of several antimicrobials on the viability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 flow biofilms.Bacterial biofilms are surface-attached communities that are encased in a polymeric matrix, which exhibit a high degree of resistance to antimicrobial agents and the host immune system (12, 16). This makes them medically important; diseases with a biofilm component are chronic and difficult to eradicate. Examples of such diseases are cystitis (1), endocarditis (31), cystic fibrosis (35), and middle-ear (17) and indwelling medical device-associated (20) infections. Biofilms also play important environmental roles in, for example, wastewater treatment (38), bioremediation (29, 30), biofouling (7), and biocorrosion (2). Better control of biofilms requires elucidation of the molecular basis of their superior resistance (by identifying resistance-compromised mutants) and identification of compounds with antibiofilm activity. While our understanding of these aspects of biofilms has increased (11, 15, 25-27, 36), further work, including development of accurate high-throughput (HTP) methods for screening biofilm viability, is needed.Two major biofilm models are studied in the laboratory, biofilms grown without a continuous flow of fresh medium and biofilms grown with a continuous flow of fresh medium; examples of these two models are microtiter well biofilms and flow cell biofilms, respectively. Methods have been developed for HTP screening of the viability of static biofilms (6, 28, 32, 33), but there are no methods for HTP screening of flow biofilms. The latter biofilms are typically grown in flow cells, which have to be examined individually to determine viability and thus cannot be used for rapid screening. An HTP screening method for flow biofilms is desirable, as these biofilms more closely approximate natural biofilms and can differ from static biofilms evidently due to hydrodynamic influences on cell signaling (22, 34). For example, the ability of rpoS-deficient Escherichia coli (lacking σ^S) to form flow biofilms is impaired, but its capacity to form biofilms under static conditions is enhanced (18).We describe here a new application of a recently developed device (8-10, 13), the “BioFlux” device consisting of microfluidic channels for biofilm growth. Other microfluidic devices have recently been used for biofilm formation (14, 19, 21, 23), but none of them has been used for HTP screening. The BioFlux device permits rapid measurement of the fluorescence of flow biofilms with a plate reader, which permits initial HTP screening of the viability of such biofilms.     

Evaluation of Different Methods for Extracting Extracellular DNA from the Biofilm Matrix

The occurrence of high concentrations of extracellular DNA (eDNA) in the extracellular matrices of biofilms plays an important role in biofilm formation and development and possibly in horizontal gene transfer through natural transformation. Studies have been conducted to characterize the nature of eDNA and its potential function in biofilm development, but it is difficult to extract eDNA from the extracellular matrices of biofilms without any contamination from genomic DNA released by cell lysis during the extraction process. In this report, we compared several different extraction methods in order to obtain highly pure eDNA from different biofilm samples. After different extraction methods were explored, it was concluded that using chemical treatment or enzymatic treatment of biofilm samples may obtain larger amounts of eDNA than using the simple filtration method. There was no detectable cell lysis when the enzymatic treatment methods were used, but substantial cell lysis was observed when the chemical treatment methods were used. These data suggest that eDNA may bind to other extracellular polymers in the biofilm matrix and that enzymatic treatment methods are effective and favorable for extracting eDNA from biofilm samples. Moreover, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of eDNA in Acinetobacter sp. biofilms and Acinetobacter sp. genomic DNA and DNA sequencing analysis revealed that eDNA originated from genomic DNA but was not structurally identical to the genomic DNA.A biofilm is a well-organized community of microorganisms that adheres to surfaces and is embedded in the slimy extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). EPSs are a complex mixture composed of high-molecular-mass polymers (>10,000 Da) generated by the bacterial cells, cell lysis and hydrolysis products, and organic matter adsorbed from the substrate. EPSs are involved in the establishment of stable arrangements of microorganisms in biofilms (40), and it recently was found that extracellular DNA (eDNA) is one of the major components of EPSs (7, 31). eDNA plays a very important role in biofilm development (39), and it is believed to be involved in providing substrates for sibling cells, maintaining the three-dimensional structure of biofilms, and enhancing the exchange of genetic materials (18, 31). eDNA has also been found to be accumulated in cultures of several bacterial species and has been postulated as being released by bacterial cells (11, 15, 21, 30). Although it is commonly accepted that eDNA is released mainly from cell lysis (11, 23, 24, 28, 34, 41), several studies have revealed that some other active secretion mechanisms may exist (1, 6, 11, 27). Recent evidence, however, indicates the possibility that eDNA is secreted actively via transport vesicles for the purpose of creating the biofilm matrix (39). Bockelmann et al. found that eDNA formed a defined, network-like spatial structure in the biofilm of an aquatic bacterium and identified that eDNA was not completely identical to genomic DNA by using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and restriction endonuclease analyses (3). By using RAPD analysis, principal-components analysis, and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, Steinberger and Holden (33) also characterized eDNA in single- and multiple-species unsaturated biofilm and found that it was different from genomic DNA. However, research is still needed to elucidate the role of eDNA in biofilm structures and in the development and origins of eDNA. In order to further investigate these questions, it is important to extract most of the eDNA of high purity in the biofilm matrix and separate eDNA from other components in the EPSs and from the genomic DNA released during the extraction process. Several methods, such as high-speed centrifugation (2, 33) and membrane filtration (3), have been used to isolate eDNA from biofilm samples. However, these methods may isolate only a portion of the eDNA from biofilm samples.EPSs are composed mainly of high-molecular-weight compounds, including polysaccharides, proteins, and amphiphilic polymers (19, 20), that are secreted by microorganisms into their environment (32). The majority of proteins in the EPSs are bridged by divalent ions, including Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺, and a small fraction of carbohydrates and nucleic acids are linked to these divalent ions. Under neutral conditions, the carboxyl of protein would become ionized and negative. Through ion interaction, the divalent ions bridge the protein and the cells. In addition, eDNA may be physically or chemically associated with extracellular proteins, polysaccharides, and other polymers in the EPS matrix. The structural assemblage of proteins and polysaccharides in the complex matrix of the EPS might hinder the liberating eDNA from the EPS matrix. Therefore, it is difficult to release eDNA and other materials from the EPS matrix by only vortexing or homogenizing. Additionally, it is necessary to degrade certain components of EPSs in the biofilm matrix in order to release eDNAs that may bind to these compounds.In this study, the following extractants were chosen to treat biofilm samples for isolation of eDNA from Acinetobacter sp. strain AC811 biofilm: EDTA and cation-exchange resin (CER) (16), which both have the ability to remove cations from the EPS matrix; sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and NaOH, which are strong denaturants and are used frequently for EPS extraction from various pure and mixed cultures (17, 29); and N-glycanase (glycoprotein degradation hydrolase) (35), dispersin B (biofilm-dispersing glycoside hydrolase) (25), and proteinase K (protein hydrolase). We evaluated the efficiencies of these treatments and their impacts on the quantity and quality of eDNA extracted, and we propose that eDNA may bind to other extracellular polymers in the Acinetobacter biofilm matrix, based on the release of eDNA from the biofilm matrix after such treatments.     

Organoselenium Coating on Cellulose Inhibits the Formation of Biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus

Among the most difficult bacterial infections encountered in treating patients are wound infections, which may occur in burn victims, patients with traumatic wounds, necrotic lesions in people with diabetes, and patients with surgical wounds. Within a wound, infecting bacteria frequently develop biofilms. Many current wound dressings are impregnated with antimicrobial agents, such as silver or antibiotics. Diffusion of the agent(s) from the dressing may damage or destroy nearby healthy tissue as well as compromise the effectiveness of the dressing. In contrast, the antimicrobial agent selenium can be covalently attached to the surfaces of a dressing, prolonging its effectiveness. We examined the effectiveness of an organoselenium coating on cellulose discs in inhibiting Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Colony biofilm assays revealed that cellulose discs coated with organoselenium completely inhibited P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy of the cellulose discs confirmed these results. Additionally, the coating on the cellulose discs was stable and effective after a week of incubation in phosphate-buffered saline. These results demonstrate that 0.2% selenium in a coating on cellulose discs effectively inhibits bacterial attachment and biofilm formation and that, unlike other antimicrobial agents, longer periods of exposure to an aqueous environment do not compromise the effectiveness of the coating.Among the most difficult bacterial infections encountered in treating patients are wound infections, which may occur in burn victims (10), patients with traumatic wounds (33), people with diabetes (27), and patients with surgical wounds (29, 31). Two of the more common causative agents of wound infections are Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10, 27, 29, 31, 33). Such infections often lead to fatality; the mortality rate among patients infected with P. aeruginosa ranges from 26% to 55% (9, 49), while mortality from S. aureus infection ranges from 19% to 38% (28, 46, 50). As opportunistic pathogens, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa cause few infections in healthy individuals but readily cause infection once host defenses are compromised, such as with the removal of skin from burns (10). S. aureus infection originates from the normal flora of either the patient or health care workers (48), while P. aeruginosa is acquired from the environment surrounding the patient (41). Once established on the skin, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa are then able to colonize the wound. Infection results if the organisms proliferate in the wound environment.Both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus often exist within burn wounds as biofilms (43, 47). A biofilm is presently defined as a sessile microbial community characterized by cells that are irreversibly attached either to a substratum or to each other (16). Biofilms, which can attain over 100 μm in thickness, are made up of multiple layers of bacteria in an exopolysaccharide matrix (12, 16, 42). Sauer et al. showed that P. aeruginosa biofilms form in distinct developmental stages: reversible attachment, irreversible attachment, two stages of maturation, and a dispersion phase (42). Clinically, biofilms present serious medical management problems through their association with different chronic infections (37). During vascular catheter-related infections and sepsis, biofilms serve as a reservoir of bacteria from which planktonic cells detach and spread throughout the tissue and/or enter the circulatory system, resulting in bacteremia or septicemia (15). Factors specific to the bacterium may influence the formation of bacterial biofilms at different infection sites or surfaces. For example, during the initial attachment stage the flagellum, lipopolysaccharide, and possibly outer membrane proteins play a major role in bringing P. aeruginosa into proximity with the surface as well as mediating the interaction with the substratum (12). Using the murine model of thermal injury, we recently showed that P. aeruginosa forms a biofilm within the thermally injured tissues (43). Clinically, the surgeons debride the infected or dead tissues; however, a few microorganisms may remain on the tissue surface and reinitiate biofilm formation.Antibiotics, silver, or chitosan, attached to or embedded in gauze, have been shown to be efficacious in preventing wound infection (21, 24, 26, 36). However, the resistance of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus to available antibiotics severely limits the choices for antibiotic treatment (13, 40). Additionally, silver compounds, such as silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine, leaching from dressings are toxic to human fibroblasts even at low concentrations (20, 25). Thus, effective alternative antimicrobial agents that contact the thermally injured/infected tissues and prevent the development of bacterial biofilms are required. Previous studies have shown that selenium (Se) can be covalently bound to a solid matrix and retain its ability to catalyze the formation of superoxide radicals (O₂^·−) (30). These superoxide radicals inhibit bacterial attachment to the solid surface (30). In this study, we examined the ability of a newly synthesized organoselenium-methacrylate polymer (Se-MAP) to block biofilm formation by both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. These bacteria were chosen since they cause a major share of wound infections and because drug-resistant forms of these bacteria have become a serious problem in the treatment and management of these wound infections (6, 13, 17, 18, 38). Results of the study show that 0.2% (wt/wt) Se in Se-MAP covalently attached to cellulose discs inhibited P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilm formation. This could lead to the development of a selenium-based antimicrobial coating for cotton materials that will prevent the bacterial attachment and colonization that can ultimately lead to bacterial biofilm formation during chronic infections.