Protein Tyrosine Kinase 6 Directly Phosphorylates AKT and Promotes AKT Activation in Response to Epidermal Growth Factor

Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6) is a nonmyristoylated Src-related intracellular tyrosine kinase. Although not expressed in the normal mammary gland, PTK6 is expressed in a majority of human breast tumors examined, and it has been linked to ErbB receptor signaling and AKT activation. Here we demonstrate that AKT is a direct substrate of PTK6 and that AKT tyrosine residues 315 and 326 are phosphorylated by PTK6. Association of PTK6 with AKT occurs through the SH3 domain of PTK6 and is enhanced through SH2 domain-mediated interactions following tyrosine phosphorylation of AKT. Using Src, Yes, and Fyn null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (SYF cells), we show that PTK6 phosphorylates AKT in a Src family kinase-independent manner. Introduction of PTK6 into SYF cells sensitized these cells to physiological levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and increased AKT activation. Stable introduction of active PTK6 into SYF cells also resulted in increased proliferation. Knockdown of PTK6 in the BPH-1 human prostate epithelial cell line led to decreased AKT activation in response to EGF. Our data indicate that in addition to promoting growth factor receptor-mediated activation of AKT, PTK6 can directly activate AKT to promote oncogenic signaling.Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6; also known as the breast tumor kinase BRK) is an intracellular Src-related tyrosine kinase (9, 48). Human PTK6 was identified in cultured human melanocytes (32) and breast tumor cells (39), while its mouse orthologue was cloned from normal small intestinal epithelial cell RNA (50). Although PTK6 shares overall structural similarity with Src family tyrosine kinases, it lacks an N-terminal myristoylation consensus sequence for membrane targeting (39, 51). As a consequence, PTK6 is localized to different cellular compartments, including the nucleus (14, 15). PTK6 is expressed in normal differentiated epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract (34, 42, 51), prostate (14), and skin (51-53). Expression of PTK6 is upregulated in different types of cancers, including breast carcinomas (6, 39, 54), colon cancer (34), ovarian cancer (47), head and neck cancers (33), and metastatic melanoma cells (16). The significance of apparent opposing signaling roles for PTK6 in normal differentiation and cancer is still poorly understood.In human breast tumor cells, PTK6 enhances signaling from members of the ErbB receptor family (10, 29, 30, 36, 40, 49, 54). In the HB4a immortalized human mammary gland luminal epithelial cell line, PTK6 promoted epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced ErbB3 tyrosine phosphorylation and AKT activation (29). In response to EGF stimulation, PTK6 promoted phosphorylation of the focal adhesion protein paxillin and Rac1-mediated cell migration (10). PTK6 can be activated by the ErbB3 ligand heregulin and promotes activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in breast cancer cells (40). PTK6 can also phosphorylate p190RhoGAP-A and stimulate its activity, leading to RhoA inactivation and Ras activation and thereby promoting EGF-dependent breast cancer cell migration and proliferation (49). Expression of PTK6 has been correlated with ErbB2 expression in human breast cancers (4, 5, 54).AKT (also called protein kinase B) is a serine-threonine kinase that is activated downstream of growth factor receptors (38). It is a key player in signaling pathways that regulate energy metabolism, proliferation, and cell survival (7, 45). Aberrant activation of AKT through diverse mechanisms has been discovered in different cancers (2). AKT activation requires phosphorylation of AKT on threonine residue 308 and serine residue 473. The significance of phosphorylation of AKT on tyrosine residues is less well understood. Src has been shown to phosphorylate AKT on conserved tyrosine residues 315 and 326 near the activation loop (11). Substitution of these two tyrosine residues with phenylalanine abolished AKT kinase activity stimulated by EGF (11). Use of the Src family inhibitor PP2 impaired AKT activation following IGF-1 stimulation of oligodendrocytes (13). The RET/PTC receptor tyrosine kinase that responds to glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor also phosphorylated AKT tyrosine residue 315 promoting activation of AKT (28). AKT tyrosine residue 474 was phosphorylated when cells were treated with the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate, and phosphorylation of tyrosine 474 contributed to full activation of AKT (12). Recently, the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Ack1 was shown to regulate AKT tyrosine phosphorylation and activation (37).Here we show that AKT is a cytoplasmic substrate of the intracellular tyrosine kinase PTK6. We identify the tyrosine residues on AKT that are targeted by PTK6, and we demonstrate that tyrosine phosphorylation plays a role in regulating association between PTK6 and AKT. In addition, we show that PTK6 promotes AKT activation and cell proliferation in a Src-independent manner.     

Role of Conserved Cysteines in the Alphavirus E3 Protein

Alphavirus particles are covered by 80 glycoprotein spikes that are essential for viral entry. Spikes consist of the E2 receptor binding protein and the E1 fusion protein. Spike assembly occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum, where E1 associates with pE2, a precursor containing E3 and E2 proteins. E3 is a small, cysteine-rich, extracellular glycoprotein that mediates proper folding of pE2 and its subsequent association with E1. In addition, cleavage of E3 from the assembled spike is required to make the virus particles efficiently fusion competent. We have found that the E3 protein in Sindbis virus contains one disulfide bond between residues Cys19 and Cys25. Replacing either of these two critical cysteines resulted in mutants with attenuated titers. Replacing both cysteines with either alanine or serine resulted in double mutants that were lethal. Insertion of additional cysteines based on E3 proteins from other alphaviruses resulted in either sequential or nested disulfide bond patterns. E3 sequences that formed sequential disulfides yielded virus with near-wild-type titers, while those that contained nested disulfide bonds had attenuated activity. Our data indicate that the role of the cysteine residues in E3 is not primarily structural. We hypothesize that E3 has an enzymatic or functional role in virus assembly, and these possibilities are further discussed.Alphaviruses are members of the Togaviradae family and are single-stranded, positive-sense RNA, enveloped viruses (17). The lipid membranes of the viruses have 80 glycoprotein spikes which are required for viral entry. Each spike is comprised of three copies of a heterodimer which consists of the E2 and E1 proteins (22, 54). E2 and E1 are glycoproteins with a single transmembrane helix that traverses the host-derived lipid bilayer. E2 interacts with the nucleocapsid core at the C terminus (12, 16, 27, 43) and contains the receptor binding site at the N terminus (5, 21, 45). E1 is the viral fusion protein responsible for mediating fusion between the virus membrane and the host cell membrane during an infection (13, 39, 47). Specific interactions in both the ectodomain and transmembrane regions are critical for heterodimer formation (30, 35, 46, 54). The assembly of each heterodimer, its subsequent assembly into a spike, and the interaction of the cytoplasmic tail of the spike with the nucleocapsid core are all essential for the efficient production of infectious particles.Glycoprotein spike assembly requires four structural proteins, E3, E2, 6K, and E1, which are expressed as a single polyprotein. E3 is a small, 64-amino-acid protein (Sindbis virus [SINV] numbering) and contains a signal sequence that translocates the protein into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (3, 4, 15). Early in translation, glycosylation of N14 (SINV numbering) occurs and this promotes E3''s release from the ER membrane into the lumen. As a result, the signal sequence is not cleaved from the E3 protein (14). Cellular enzymes cleave the polyprotein to yield pE2 (an uncleaved protein consisting of E3 and E2), 6K, and E1 (23, 55) proteins. In the ER, E1 is found in several conformations, only one of which will form a functional heterodimer with pE2, allowing its transport to the Golgi apparatus (1, 2, 6, 7, 36). After pE2-E1 heterodimerization, self-association between three heterodimers occurs and each individual spike is formed (25, 26, 36). As observed with Semliki Forest virus, disulfide bonds reshuffle within pE2 during protein folding (34), possibly forming intermolecular disulfide bonds between E3 and E2 residues. However, no intermolecular disulfide bonds between pE2 and E1 have been identified (34). Once the viral spikes have been assembled, they are transported to the plasma membrane (11) and are thus exposed to subcellular changes of pH, from pH 7.2 in the ER to pH 5.7 in the vesicles constitutively transporting the spikes to the plasma membrane. In the trans-Golgi network, the E3 protein is cleaved from pE2 by the cellular protein furin (18, 44, 55). E3 remains noncovalently attached to the released virus particle, while in other species E3 is found in the medium of virus-infected cells (32, 49).E3 is required for efficient particle assembly, both in mediating spike folding and in spike activation for viral entry. When an ER signal sequence was substituted for the E3 protein, heterodimerization of pE2 and E1 was abolished (26). Furthermore, when E2 and E1 were expressed individually, low levels of E2 were transported to the cell surface while E1 remained in the ER, suggesting that heterodimerization with pE2 is necessary for E1 to be transported to the cell surface (24, 26, 46). These results are consistent with E3 playing a critical role in mediating the folding of pE2 and the association of pE2 and E1 proteins during spike assembly (7, 38). In viruses where the furin cleavage site was mutated, the virus particles were correctly assembled but severely reduced in infectivity, presumably because the fusion protein was unable to dissociate from pE2 and initiate fusion (44, 55).A comparison of an amino acid sequence alignment of E3 proteins from different alphaviruses (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) shows that the E3 protein is a small protein with four conserved cysteine (Cys) residues. A subset of E3 proteins contains an additional two Cys residues in a narrow cysteine/proline-rich region, PPCXPCC (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). We have purified recombinant E3 protein from SINV and have determined that a disulfide bond is present and, furthermore, that these Cys residues are important in virus assembly. Within the alphavirus E3 proteins, we have identified a region that is important for mediating spike transport to the plasma membrane and thus is critical for spike assembly.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.E3 amino acid sequence alignment from a representative group of alphaviruses. The cysteines marked with asterisks are conserved in all alphavirus species. The ⋄ indicates the conserved but nonessential glycosylation site. The PPCXPCC motif present in ∼50% of alphaviruses is underlined. SFV, Semliki Forest virus; RRV, Ross River virus; BFV, Barmah Forest virus; EEE, eastern equine encephalitis virus; ONN, O''nyong nyong virus; IGB, Igbo Ora virus; OCK, Ockelbo virus; WEE, western equine encephalitis virus; AUR, Aura virus; VEE, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus.     

Interactions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles

The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms. Biofilm-derived membrane vesicles (MVs) and DNA, both matrix components, demonstrated concentration-, pH-, and cation-dependent interactions. Furthermore, MV-DNA association influenced MV surface properties. This bears consequences for the reactivity and availability for interaction of matrix polymers and other constituents.The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms and is crucial for the development of fundamental biofilm properties (46, 47). Early studies defined polysaccharides as the matrix component, but proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are all now acknowledged as important contributors (7, 15). Indeed, DNA has emerged as a vital participant, fulfilling structural and functional roles (1, 5, 6, 19, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44). The phosphodiester bond of DNA renders this polyanionic at a physiological pH, undoubtedly contributing to interactions with cations, humic substances, fine-dispersed minerals, and matrix entities (25, 41, 49).In addition to particulates such as flagella and pili, membrane vesicles (MVs) are also found within the matrices of gram-negative and mixed biofilms (3, 16, 40). MVs are multifunctional bilayered structures that bleb from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (reviewed in references 4, 24, 27, 28, and 30) and are chemically heterogeneous, combining the known chemistries of the biofilm matrix. Examination of biofilm samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has suggested that matrix material interacts with MVs (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Since MVs produced in planktonic culture have associated DNA (11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 30, 39, 48), could biofilm-derived MVs incorporate DNA (1, 39, 40, 44)?Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Possible interactions between matrix polymers and particulate structures. Shown is an electron micrograph of a thin section through a P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. During processing, some dehydration occurred, resulting in collapse of matrix material into fibrillate arrangements (black filled arrows). There is a suggestion of interactions occurring with particulate structures such as MVs (hollow white arrow) and flagella (filled white arrows) (identified by the appearance and cross-dimension of these highly ordered structures when viewed at high magnification), which was consistently observed with other embedded samples and also with whole-mount preparations of gently disrupted biofilms (data not shown). The scale bar represents 200 nm.     

Role of Complex Carbohydrates in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection and Resistance to Antibody Neutralization

Complex N-glycans flank the receptor binding sites of the outer domain of HIV-1 gp120, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against antibodies. Here, we investigated the effects of rebuilding this fence with smaller glycoforms by expressing HIV-1 pseudovirions from a primary isolate in a human cell line lacking N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), the enzyme that initiates the conversion of oligomannose N-glycans into complex N-glycans. Thus, complex glycans, including those that surround the receptor binding sites, are replaced by fully trimmed oligomannose stumps. Conversely, the untrimmed oligomannoses of the silent domain of gp120 are likely to remain unchanged. For comparison, we produced a mutant virus lacking a complex N-glycan of the V3 loop (N301Q). Both variants exhibited increased sensitivities to V3 loop-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and soluble CD4. The N301Q virus was also sensitive to “nonneutralizing” MAbs targeting the primary and secondary receptor binding sites. Endoglycosidase H treatment resulted in the removal of outer domain glycans from the GnTI- but not the parent Env trimers, and this was associated with a rapid and complete loss in infectivity. Nevertheless, the glycan-depleted trimers could still bind to soluble receptor and coreceptor analogs, suggesting a block in post-receptor binding conformational changes necessary for fusion. Collectively, our data show that the antennae of complex N-glycans serve to protect the V3 loop and CD4 binding site, while N-glycan stems regulate native trimer conformation, such that their removal can lead to global changes in neutralization sensitivity and, in extreme cases, an inability to complete the conformational rearrangements necessary for infection.The intriguing results of a recent clinical trial suggest that an effective HIV-1 vaccine may be possible (97). Optimal efficacy may require a component that induces broadly neutralizing antibodies (BNAbs) that can block virus infection by their exclusive ability to recognize the trimeric envelope glycoprotein (Env) spikes on particle surfaces (43, 50, 87, 90). Env is therefore at the center of vaccine design programs aiming to elicit effective humoral immune responses.The amino acid sequence variability of Env presents a significant challenge for researchers seeking to elicit broadly effective NAbs. Early sequence comparisons revealed, however, that the surface gp120 subunit can be divided into discrete variable and conserved domains (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (110), the latter providing some hope for broadly effective NAb-based vaccines. Indeed, the constraints on variability in the conserved domains of gp120 responsible for binding the host cell receptor CD4, and coreceptor, generally CCR5, provide potential sites of vulnerability. However, viral defense strategies, such as the conformational masking of conserved epitopes (57), have made the task of eliciting bNAbs extremely difficult.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Glycan biosynthesis and distribution on gp120 and gp41. (A) Putative carbohydrate modifications are shown on gp120 and gp41 secondary structures, based on various published works (26, 42, 63, 74, 119, 128). The gp120 outer domain is indicated, as are residues that form the SOS gp120-gp41 disulfide bridge. The outer domain is divided into neutralizing and silent faces. Symbols distinguish complex, oligomannose, and unknown glycans. Generally, the complex glycans of the outer domain line the receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, while the oligomannose glycans of the outer domain protect the silent domain (105). Asterisks denote sequons that are unlikely to be utilized, including position 139 (42), position 189 (26, 42), position 406 (42, 74), and position 637 (42). Glycans shown in gray indicate when sequon clustering may lead to some remaining unused, e.g., positions 156 and 160 (42, 119), positions 386, 392, and 397 (42), and positions 611 and 616 (42). There is also uncertainty regarding some glycan identities: glycans at positions 188, 355, 397, and 448 are not classified as predominantly complex or oligomannose (26, 42, 63, 128). The number of mannose moieties on oligomannose glycans can vary, as can the number of antennae and sialic acids on complex glycans (77). The glycan at position 301 appears to be predominantly a tetra-antennary complex glycan, as is the glycan at position 88, while most other complex glycans are biantennary (26, 128). (B) Schematic of essential steps of glycan biosynthesis from the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor to a mature multiantennary complex glycan. Mannosidase I progressively removes mannose moieties from the precursor, in a process that can be inhibited by the drug kifunensine. GnTI then transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the resulting Man₅GlcNAc₂ intermediate, creating a hybrid glycan. Mannose trimming of the D2 and D3 arms then allows additional GlcNAc moieties to be added by a series of GnT family enzymes to form multiantennary complexes. This process can be inhibited by swainsonine. The antennae are ultimately capped and decorated by galactose and sialic acid. Hybrid and complex glycans are usually fucosylated at the basal GlcNAc, rendering them resistant to endo H digestion. However, NgF is able to remove all types of glycan.Carbohydrates provide a layer of protection against NAb attack (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). As glycans are considered self, antibody responses against them are thought to be regulated by tolerance mechanisms. Thus, a glycan network forms a nonimmunogenic “cloak,” protecting the underlying protein from antibodies (3, 13, 20, 29, 39, 54, 65, 67, 74, 85, 96, 98, 117, 119, 120). The extent of this protection can be illustrated by considering the ways in which glycans differ from typical amino acid side chains. First, N-linked glycans are much larger, with an average mass more than 20 times that of a typical amino acid R-group. They are also usually more flexible and may therefore affect a greater volume of surrounding space. In the more densely populated parts of gp120, the carbohydrate field may even be stabilized by sugar-sugar hydrogen bonds, providing even greater coverage (18, 75, 125).The process of N-linked glycosylation can result in diverse structures that may be divided into three categories: oligomannose, hybrid, and complex (56). Each category shares a common Man₃GlcNAc₂ pentasaccharide stem (where Man is mannose and GlcNAc is N-acetylglucosamine), to which up to six mannose residues are attached in oligomannose N-glycans, while complex N-glycans are usually larger and may bear various sizes and numbers of antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Glycan synthesis begins in the endoplasmic reticulum, where N-linked oligomannose precursors (Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂; Glc is glucose) are transferred cotranslationally to the free amide of the asparagine in a sequon Asn-X-Thr/Ser, where X is not Pro (40). Terminal glucose and mannose moieties are then trimmed to yield Man₅GlcNAc₂ (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Conversion to a hybrid glycan is then initiated by N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), which transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate (19) (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). This hybrid glycoform is then a substrate for modification into complex glycans, in which the D2 and D3 arm mannose residues are replaced by complex antennae (19, 40, 56). Further enzymatic action catalyzes the addition of α-1-6-linked fucose moiety to the lower GlcNAc of complex glycan stems, but usually not to oligomannose glycan stems (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (21, 113).Most glycoproteins exhibit only fully mature complex glycans. However, the steric limitations imposed by the high density of glycans on some parts of gp120 lead to incomplete trimming, leaving “immature” oligomannose glycans (22, 26, 128). Spatial competition between neighboring sequons can sometimes lead to one or the other remaining unutilized, further distancing the final Env product from what might be expected based on its primary sequence (42, 48, 74, 119). An attempt to assign JR-FL gp120 and gp41 sequon use and types, based on various studies, is shown in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A (6, 26, 34, 35, 42, 63, 71, 74, 119, 128). At some positions, the glycan type is conserved. For example, the glycan at residue N301 has consistently been found to be complex (26, 63, 128). At other positions, considerable heterogeneity exists in the glycan populations, in some cases to the point where it is difficult to unequivocally assign them as predominantly complex or oligomannose. The reasons for these uncertainties might include incomplete trimming (42), interstrain sequence variability, the form of Env (e.g., gp120 or gp140), and the producer cell. The glycans of native Env trimers and monomeric gp120 may differ due to the constraints imposed by oligomerization (32, 41, 77). Thus, although all the potential sequons of HXB2 gp120 were found to be occupied in one study (63), some are unutilized or variably utilized on functional trimers, presumably due to steric limitations (42, 48, 75, 96, 119).The distribution of complex and oligomannose glycans on gp120 largely conforms with an antigenic map derived from structural models (59, 60, 102, 120), in which the outer domain is divided into a neutralizing face and an immunologically silent face. Oligomannose glycans cluster tightly on the silent face of gp120 (18, 128), while complex glycans flank the gp120 receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against NAbs (105). The relatively sparse clustering of complex glycans that form this fence may reflect a trade-off between protecting the underlying functional domains from NAbs by virtue of large antennae while at the same time permitting sufficient flexibility for the refolding events associated with receptor binding and fusion (29, 39, 67, 75, 98, 117). Conversely, the dense clustering of oligomannose glycans on the silent domain may be important for ensuring immune protection and/or in creating binding sites for lectins such as DC-SIGN (9, 44).The few available broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) define sites of vulnerability on Env trimers (reviewed in reference 52). They appear to fall into two general categories: those that access conserved sites by overcoming Env''s various evasion strategies and, intriguingly, those that exploit these very defensive mechanisms. Regarding the first category, MAb b12 recognizes an epitope that overlaps the CD4 binding site of gp120 (14), and MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 (84, 129) recognize adjacent epitopes of the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) at the C-terminal ectodomain of gp41. The variable neutralizing potencies of these MAbs against primary isolates that contain their core epitopes illustrate how conformational masking can dramatically regulate their exposure (11, 118). Conformational masking also limits the activities of MAbs directed to the V3 loop and MAbs whose epitopes overlap the coreceptor binding site (11, 62, 121).A second category of MAbs includes MAb 2G12, which recognizes a tight cluster of glycans in the silent domain of gp120 (16, 101, 103, 112). This epitope has recently sparked considerable interest in exploiting glycan clusters as possible carbohydrate-based vaccines (2, 15, 31, 70, 102, 116). Two recently described MAbs, PG9 and PG16 (L. M. Walker and D. R. Burton, unpublished data), also target epitopes regulated by the presence of glycans that involve conserved elements of the second and third variable loops and depend largely on the quaternary trimer structure and its in situ presentation on membranes. Their impressive breadth and potency may come from the fact that they target the very mechanisms (variable loops and glycans) that are generally thought to protect the virus from neutralization. Like 2G12, these epitopes are likely to be constitutively exposed and thus may not be subject to conformational masking (11, 118).The above findings reveal the importance of N-glycans both as a means of protection against neutralization as well as in directly contributing to unique neutralizing epitopes. Clearly, further studies on the nature and function of glycans in native Env trimers are warranted. Possible approaches may be divided into four categories, namely, (i) targeted mutation, (ii) enzymatic removal, (iii) expression in the presence of glycosylation inhibitors, and (iv) expression in mutant cell lines with engineered blocks in the glycosylation pathway. Much of the available information on the functional roles of glycans in HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection has come from the study of mutants that eliminate glycans either singly or in combination (20, 54, 66, 71, 74, 91, 95, 96). Most mutants of this type remain at least partially functional (74, 95, 96). In some cases these mutants have little effect on neutralization sensitivity, while in others they can lead to increased sensitivity to MAbs specific for the V3 loop and CD4 binding site (CD4bs) (54, 71, 72, 74, 106). In exceptional cases, increased sensitivity to MAbs targeting the coreceptor binding site and/or the gp41 MPER has been observed (54, 66, 72, 74).Of the remaining approaches for studying the roles of glycans, enzymatic removal is constrained by the extreme resistance of native Env trimers to many common glycosidases, contrasting with the relative sensitivity of soluble gp120 (67, 76, 101). Alternatively, drugs can be used to inhibit various stages of mammalian glycan biosynthesis. Notable examples are imino sugars, such as N-butyldeoxynojirimycin (NB-DNJ), that inhibit the early trimming of the glucose moieties from Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors in the endoplasmic reticulum (28, 38, 51). Viruses produced in the presence of these drugs may fail to undergo proper gp160 processing or fusion (37, 51). Other classes of inhibitor include kifunensine and swainsonine, which, respectively, inhibit the trimming of the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor into Man₅GlcNAc₂ or inhibit the removal of remaining D2 and D3 arm mannoses from the hybrid glycans, thus preventing the construction of complex glycan antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 33, 76, 104, 119). Unlike NB-DNJ, viruses produced in the presence of these drugs remain infectious (36, 76, 79, 100).Yet another approach is to express virus in insect cells that can only modify proteins with paucimannose N-glycans (58). However, the inefficient gp120/gp41 processing by furin-like proteases in these cells prevents their utility in functional studies (123). Another option is provided by ricin-selected GnTI-deficient cell lines that cannot transfer GlcNAc onto the mannosidase-trimmed Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate, preventing the formation of hybrid and complex carbohydrates (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 32, 36, 94). This arrests glycan processing at a well-defined point, leading to the substitution of complex glycans with Man₅GlcNAc₂ rather than with the larger Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors typically obtained with kifunensine treatment (17, 32, 33, 104). With this in mind, here we produced HIV-1 pseudoviruses in GnTI-deficient cells to investigate the role of complex glycan antennae in viral resistance neutralization. By replacing complex glycans with smaller Man₅GlcNAc₂ we can determine the effect of “lowering the glycan fence” that surrounds the receptor binding sites, compared to the above-mentioned studies of individual glycan deletion mutants, whose effects are analogous to removing a fence post. Furthermore, since oligomannose glycans are sensitive to certain enzymes, such as endoglycosidase H (endo H), we investigated the effect of dismantling the glycan fence on Env function and stability. Our results suggest that the antennae of complex glycans protect against certain specificities but that glycan stems regulate trimer conformation with often more dramatic consequences for neutralization sensitivity and in extreme cases, infectious function.     

RNA Structures Required for Production of Subgenomic Flavivirus RNA

Flaviviruses are a group of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses causing ∼100 million infections per year. We have recently shown that flaviviruses produce a unique, small, noncoding RNA (∼0.5 kb) derived from the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of the genomic RNA (gRNA), which is required for flavivirus-induced cytopathicity and pathogenicity (G. P. Pijlman et al., Cell Host Microbe, 4: 579-591, 2008). This RNA (subgenomic flavivirus RNA [sfRNA]) is a product of incomplete degradation of gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, which stalls on the rigid secondary structure stem-loop II (SL-II) located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR. Mutations or deletions of various secondary structures in the 3′ UTR resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3). Here, we investigated in detail the importance of West Nile virus Kunjin (WNV_KUN) 3′ UTR secondary structures as well as tertiary interactions for sfRNA formation. We show that secondary structures SL-IV and dumbbell 1 (DB1) downstream of SL-II are able to prevent further degradation of gRNA when the SL-II structure is deleted, leading to production of sfRNA2 and sfRNA3, respectively. We also show that a number of pseudoknot (PK) interactions, in particular PK1 stabilizing SL-II and PK3 stabilizing DB1, are required for protection of gRNA from nuclease degradation and production of sfRNA. Our results show that PK interactions play a vital role in the production of nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is essential for viral cytopathicity in cells and pathogenicity in mice.Arthropod-borne flaviviruses such as West Nile virus (WNV), dengue virus (DENV), and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) cause major outbreaks of potentially fatal disease and affect over 50 million people every year. The highly pathogenic North American strain of WNV (WNV_NY99) has already claimed more than 1,000 lives with over 27,000 cases reported since its emergence in New York in 1999 and has raised global public health concerns (9). In contrast, the closely related Australian strain of WNV, WNV_KUN, is highly attenuated and does not cause overt disease in humans and animals (11). WNV_KUN has been used extensively as a model virus to study flavivirus replication and flavivirus-host interactions (13, 14, 16-19, 26, 38, 39).The ∼11-kb positive-stranded, capped WNV genomic RNA (gRNA) lacks a poly(A) tail and consists of 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) flanking one open reading frame, which encodes the viral proteins required for the viral life cycle (6, 15, 38, 39). Flavivirus UTRs are involved in translation and initiation of RNA replication and likely determine genome packaging (13, 14, 16, 21, 30, 39-41). Both the 5′ UTR (∼100 nucleotides [nt] in size) and the 3′ UTR (from ∼400 to 700 nucleotides) can form secondary and tertiary structures which are highly conserved among mosquito-borne flaviviruses (1, 8, 10, 14, 29, 32, 34). More specifically, the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR consists of several conserved regions and secondary structures (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) which were previously predicted or shown to exist in various flaviviruses by computational and chemical analyses, respectively (4, 10, 25, 26, 29-32). The 5′ end of the 3′ UTR starts with an AU-rich region which can form stem-loop structure I (SL-I) followed by SL-II, which we previously showed to be vitally important for subgenomic flavivirus RNA (sfRNA) production (26; see also below). SL-II is followed by a short, repeated conserved hairpin (RCS3) and SL-III (26). Further downstream of SL-III are the SL-IV and CS3 structures, which are remarkably similar to the preceding SL-II-RCS3 structure (26, 29). Further downstream of the SL-IV-CS3 structure are dumbbells 1 and 2 (DB1 and DB2, respectively) followed by a short SL and the 3′ SL (25, 26).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.(A) Model of the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR RNA structure. Highlighted in bold are the secondary structures investigated here. Dashed lines indicate putative PKs. The two sites of the putative PK interactions are shown in open boxes. sfRNA1, -2, -3, and -4 start sites are indicated by arrows. (R)CS, (repeated) conserved sequence; DB, dumbbell structure; PK, pseudoknot; SL, stem-loop. (B) Structural model of PK1 in SL-II with disruptive mutations. Nucleotide numbering is from the end of the 3′ UTR. The sfRNA1 start is indicated by an arrow. Nucleotides forming PK1 are on a gray background, and mutated nucleotides are white on a black background. (C) Sequences mutated in the different constructs. Nucleotides in the wt PK sequences used for mutations are bold and underlined. Introduced mutations are shown under the corresponding nucleotides in the wt sequence.The described structures have been investigated in some detail for their requirement in RNA replication and translation. Generally, a progressive negative effect on viral growth was shown with progressive deletions into the 3′-proximal region of the JEV 3′ UTR (41). However, only a relatively short region of the JEV 3′ UTR, consisting of the 3′-terminal 193 nt, was shown to be absolutely essential for gRNA replication (41). The minimal region for DENV replication was reported to be even shorter (23). Extensive analysis has shown that the most 3′-terminal, essential regions of the 3′ UTR include the cyclization sequence and 3′ SL, which are required for efficient RNA replication (2, 14, 16, 23, 35). As we showed, deletion of SL-II or SL-I did not overtly affect WNV_KUN replication (26). However, deletion of CS2, RCS2, CS3, or RCS3 in WNV replicon RNA significantly reduced RNA replication but not translation (20), indicating that these elements facilitate but are not essential for RNA replication. In addition, it was shown that deletion of DB1 or DB2 resulted in a viable mutant virus that was reduced in growth efficiency, while deletion of both DB structures resulted in a nonviable mutant (23).In addition to the above-mentioned secondary stem-loop structures, computational and chemical analysis of the flavivirus 3′ UTR suggested the presence of 5 pseudoknot (PK) interactions (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (25, 26, 32). A PK is a structure formed upon base pairing of a single-stranded region of RNA in the loop of a hairpin to a stretch of complementary nucleotides elsewhere in the RNA chain (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). These structures are referred to as hairpin type (H-type) PKs (3), and they usually stabilize secondary RNA structures. Typically, the final tertiary structure does not significantly alter the preformed secondary structure (5). In general, PK interactions have been shown to be important in biological processes such as initiation and/or elongation of translation, initiation of gRNA replication, and ribosomal frameshifting for a number of different viruses, including flaviviruses (reviewed in references 3 and 22). The first PK in the WNV 3′ UTR was predicted to form in SL-II, followed by a similar PK in SL-IV (26) (PK1 and PK2 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). For the DENV, yellow fever virus (YFV), and JEV subgroup of flaviviruses, two PKs further downstream were predicted to form between DB1 and DB2 and corresponding single-stranded RNA regions located further downstream (25) (PK3 and PK4 in Fig. ​Fig.1A).1A). The formation of these structures is supported by covariations in the WNV RNAs. In addition, a PK was proposed to form between a short SL and the 3′ SL at the 3′ terminus of the viral genome (32) (PK5 in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A).Importantly, in addition to its role in viral replication and translation, we have shown that the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR is important for the production of a small noncoding RNA fragment designated sfRNA (26). This short RNA fragment of ∼0.5 kb is derived from the 3′ UTR of the gRNA and exclusively produced by the members of the Flavivirus genus of the Flaviviridae family, where it is required for efficient viral replication, cytopathicity, and pathogenicity (26). Our studies suggested that sfRNA is a product of incomplete degradation of the gRNA presumably by the cellular 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN1, resulting from XRN1 stalling on the rigid secondary/tertiary structures located at the beginning of the 3′ UTR (26). XRN1 is an exoribonuclease which usually degrades mRNA from the 5′ to the 3′ end as part of cellular mRNA decay and turnover (33), and it was shown previously that XRN1 can be stalled by SL structures (28). Mutations or deletions of WNV 3′ UTR secondary structures resulted in the loss of full-length sfRNA (sfRNA1) and production of smaller and less abundant sfRNAs (sfRNA2 and sfRNA3) (26). In particular, SL-II (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) was shown to be important for sfRNA1 production; deletion of this structure either alone or in conjunction with other structures located downstream of SL-II abolished sfRNA1 production, leading to the production of the smaller RNA fragments sfRNA2 and sfRNA3.Here, we extended our investigation and studied the importance of several predicted 3′ UTR secondary structures and PK interactions for the production of sfRNA. To further understand the generation mechanism of sfRNA and its requirements, we deleted or mutated a number of RNA structures in the WNV_KUN 3′ UTR and investigated the size and amount of sfRNA generated from these mutant RNAs. The results show that not only SLs but also PK interactions play a vital role in stabilizing the 3′ UTR RNA and preventing complete degradation of viral gRNA to produce nuclease-resistant sfRNA, which is required for efficient virus replication and cytopathicity in cells and virulence in mice.     

Pseudotyping Incompatibility between HIV-1 and Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus Env Is Modulated by Vpu

The Env protein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been shown to be incompatible with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the production of infectious pseudotyped particles. This incompatibility has been mapped to the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env. Surprisingly, we found that the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu modulates this incompatibility. The infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with murine leukemia virus (MLV) Env was not affected by Vpu. However, the infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with an MLV Env with the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env (MLV/GaLV Env) was restricted 50- to 100-fold by Vpu. A Vpu mutant containing a scrambled membrane-spanning domain, Vpu_RD, was still able to restrict MLV/GaLV Env, but mutation of the serine residues at positions 52 and 56 completely alleviated the restriction. Loss of infectivity appeared to be caused by reduced MLV/GaLV Env incorporation into viral particles. The mechanism of this downmodulation appears to be distinct from Vpu-mediated CD4 downmodulation because Vpu-expressing cells that failed to produce infectious HIV-1 particles nonetheless continued to display robust surface MLV/GaLV Env expression. In addition, if MLV and HIV-1 were simultaneously introduced into the same cells, only the HIV-1 particle infectivity was restricted by Vpu. Collectively, these data suggest that Vpu modulates the cellular distribution of MLV/GaLV Env, preventing its recruitment to HIV-1 budding sites.The gammaretrovirus gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been widely used for gene therapy because of its wide host cell tropism and nonpathogenicity (1, 6, 10, 12, 13, 20). The host cell receptor for GaLV Env has been cloned and identified as a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein (25, 26). Like other retroviruses, GaLV encodes a single transmembrane surface glycoprotein (GaLV Env), which is cleaved into surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) subunits (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The TM domain of GaLV Env contains a short 30-amino-acid C-terminal cytoplasmic tail. Although GaLV Env functions well when coupled (pseudotyped) with murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vectors, it has been shown to be completely incompatible with HIV-1 (4, 35). When GaLV Env is expressed with HIV-1, essentially no infectious HIV-1 particles are produced (4, 35). The mechanism for this infectivity downmodulation is unknown, but the component of GaLV Env responsible for the restriction has been mapped to the cytoplasmic tail. Replacing the cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env with the equivalent sequence from MLV Env ameliorates the restriction. Likewise, replacing the cytoplasmic tail of MLV Env with that from GaLV Env confers the restriction (4).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic of MLV Env protein. Sequences are the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of MLV Env, GaLV Env, and human CD4. GaLV sequences in boldface are residues that have been shown to modulate the HIV-1 incompatibility (4). Underlined sequences in CD4 are amino acids required for Vpu-mediated downmodulation (2, 15). Arrows denote the location of MLV/GaLV tail substitution. SU, surface domain; TM, transmembrane domain.Vpu is an 81-amino-acid HIV-1 accessory protein produced from the same mRNA as the HIV-1 Env gene. The N terminus of Vpu contains a membrane-spanning domain, followed by a 50-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain. Vpu is unique to HIV-1 and a few closely related SIV strains. The best-characterized roles for Vpu in the HIV-1 life cycle are modulation of host proteins CD4 and tetherin (also known as BST-2, CD317, and HM1.24) (24, 38, 39). Vpu promotes the degradation of CD4 in the endoplasmic reticulum through a proteasome-dependent mechanism (29). The cytoplasmic tail of Vpu physically interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 and recruits the human β-transducing repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP) and E3 ubiquitin ligase components to polyubiquitinate and ultimately trigger the degradation of CD4 (18). Two serine residues at positions 52 and 56 of Vpu are phosphorylated by casein kinase-2 and are required for CD4 degradation (31, 32). The membrane-spanning domain of Vpu is not specifically required for CD4 degradation. A mutant protein containing a scrambled membrane-spanning sequence, Vpu_RD, is still able to trigger the degradation of CD4 (32). The region of CD4 that is targeted by Vpu is approximately 17 to 13 amino acids from the C terminus in the cytoplasmic tail (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (2, 15).In addition to degrading CD4, Vpu has also long been known to result in enhanced viral release (EVR) in certain cell lines (14, 36). Recently, the type I interferon-induced host protein tetherin was identified as being responsible for this Vpu-modulated restriction (24, 38). In the absence of Vpu, tetherin causes particles to remain tethered (hence the name) to the host cell postfission. Although Vpu counteracts the function of tetherin, the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. However, the mechanism for tetherin antagonism appears to be distinct from that for modulating CD4. Mutation of the serines 52 and 56 of Vpu abolish CD4 degradation, but only reduce EVR activity (5, 17, 21, 32). Some EVR activity remains even when much of the Vpu cytoplasmic tail is deleted (30). In addition, many mutations in the membrane-spanning domain, such as Vpu_RD, do not affect CD4 degradation and yet completely abolish EVR activity (27, 30, 37). The critical residues in tetherin for recognition by Vpu appear to be in the membrane-spanning domain and not the cytoplasmic tail (9, 19, 28). Although β-TrCP is required for complete EVR activity, there is no consensus whether the degradation of tetherin is proteasome or lysosome mediated (5, 7, 21) or whether degradation is required at all. In some cases there can be some EVR activity in the absence of tetherin degradation (17, 22).We demonstrate here that Vpu is responsible for the incompatibility between HIV-1 and GaLV Env. Glycoproteins containing the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env are prevented from being incorporated into HIV-1 particles by Vpu, effectively reducing infectious particle production by 50- to 100-fold. The serines at positions 52 and 56 are required for this restriction, but the membrane-spanning domain is not. Although the mechanism for this restriction appears similar to CD4 degradation, there are apparent differences. Vpu does not prevent surface expression, and it does not prevent its incorporation into MLV particles. Therefore, the mechanism of restriction appears to involve a system that does not rely directly on global protein degradation.     

The S Helix Mediates Signal Transmission as a HAMP Domain Coiled-Coil Extension in the NarX Nitrate Sensor from Escherichia coli K-12

In the nitrate-responsive, homodimeric NarX sensor, two cytoplasmic membrane α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain. The HAMP domain, a four-helix parallel coiled-coil built from two α-helices (HD1 and HD2), immediately follows the second transmembrane helix. Previous computational studies identified a likely coiled-coil-forming α-helix, the signaling helix (S helix), in a range of signaling proteins, including eucaryal receptor guanylyl cyclases, but its function remains obscure. In NarX, the HAMP HD2 and S-helix regions overlap and apparently form a continuous coiled-coil marked by a heptad repeat stutter discontinuity at the distal boundary of HD2. Similar composite HD2-S-helix elements are present in other sensors, such as Sln1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We constructed deletions and missense substitutions in the NarX S helix. Most caused constitutive signaling phenotypes. However, strongly impaired induction phenotypes were conferred by heptad deletions within the S-helix conserved core and also by deletions that remove the heptad stutter. The latter observation illuminates a key element of the dynamic bundle hypothesis for signaling across the heptad stutter adjacent to the HAMP domain in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (Q. Zhou, P. Ames, and J. S. Parkinson, Mol. Microbiol. 73:801-814, 2009). Sequence comparisons identified other examples of heptad stutters between a HAMP domain and a contiguous coiled-coil-like heptad repeat sequence in conventional sensors, such as CpxA, EnvZ, PhoQ, and QseC; other S-helix-containing sensors, such as BarA and TorS; and the Neurospora crassa Nik-1 (Os-1) sensor that contains a tandem array of alternating HAMP and HAMP-like elements. Therefore, stutter elements may be broadly important for HAMP function.Transmembrane signaling in homodimeric bacterial sensors initiates upon signal ligand binding to the extracytoplasmic domain. In methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), the resulting conformational change causes a displacement of one transmembrane α-helix (TM α-helix) relative to the other. This motion is conducted by the HAMP domain to control output domain activity (reviewed in references 33 and 39).Certain sensors of two-component regulatory systems share topological organization with MCPs. For example, the paralogous nitrate sensors NarX and NarQ contain an amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module similar to those in MCPs, in which a pair of TM α-helices delimit the periplasmic ligand-binding domain (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (24) (reviewed in references 32 and 62). The second TM α-helix connects to the HAMP domain. Hybrid proteins in which the NarX transmembrane signaling module regulates the kinase control modules of the MCPs Tar, DifA, and FrzCD demonstrate that NarX and MCPs share a mechanism for transmembrane signaling (73, 74, 81, 82).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.NarX modular structure. Linear representation of the NarX protein sequence, from the amino (N) to carboxyl (C) termini, drawn to scale. The four modules are indicated at the top of the figure and shown in bold typeface, whereas domains within each module are labeled with standard (lightface) typeface. The nomenclature for modules follows that devised by Swain and Falke (67) for MCPs. Overlap between the HAMP domain HD2 and S-helix elements is indicated in gray. The three conserved Cys residues within the central module (62) are indicated. TM1 and TM2 denote the two transmembrane helices. Helices H1 to H4 of the periplasmic domain (24), and the transmitter domain H, N, D, G (79), and X (41) boxes, are labeled. The HPK 7 family of transmitter sequences, including NarX, have no F box and an unconventional G box (79). The scale bar at the bottom of the figure shows the number of aminoacyl residues.The HAMP domain functions as a signal conversion module in a variety of homodimeric proteins, including histidine protein kinases, adenylyl cyclases, MCPs, and certain phosphatases (12, 20, 77). This roughly 50-residue domain consists of a pair of amphiphilic α-helices, termed HD1 and HD2 (formerly AS1 and AS2) (67), joined by a connector (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Results from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, Cys and disulfide scanning, and mutational analysis converge on a model in which the HD1 and HD2 α-helices form a four-helix parallel coiled-coil (7, 20, 30, 42, 67, 75, 84). The mechanisms through which HAMP domains mediate signal conduction remain to be established (30, 42, 67, 84) (for commentary, see references 43, 49, and 50).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.HAMP domain extensions. (A) Sequences from representative MCPs (E. coli Tsr and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium Tar) and S-helix-containing sensors (E. coli NarX, NarQ, and BarA, and S. cerevisiae Sln1p). The HAMP domain, S-helix element, and the initial sequence of the MCP adaptation region are indicated. Flanking numbers denote positions of the terminal residues within the overall sequence. Sequential heptad repeats are indicated in alternating bold and standard (lightface) typeface. Numbering for heptad repeats in the methylation region and S-helix sequences has been described previously (4, 8). Numbers within the HD1 and HD2 helices indicate interactions within the HAMP domain (42). Residues at heptad positions a and d are enclosed within boxes, residues at the stutter position a/d are enclosed within a thickly outlined box, and residues in the S-helix ERT signature are in bold typeface. (B) NarX mutational alterations. Deletions are depicted as boxes, and missense substitutions are shown above the sequence. Many of these deletions were reported previously (10) and are presented here for comparison. The phenotypes conferred by the alterations are indicated as follows: impaired induction, black box; constitutive and elevated basal, light gray box; reversed response, dark gray box; wild-type, white box; null, striped box.Coiled-coils result from packing of two or more α-helices (27). The primary sequence of coiled-coils exhibits a characteristic heptad repeat pattern, denoted as a-b-c-d-e-f-g (52, 61), in which positions a and d are usually occupied by nonpolar residues (reviewed in references 1, 47, and 80). For example, the coiled-coil nature of the HAMP domain can be seen in the heptad repeat patterns within the HD1 and HD2 sequences (Fig. ​(Fig.2A2A).Coiled-coil elements adjacent to the HAMP domain have been identified in several sensors, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sln1p (69) and Escherichia coli NarX (60). Recently, this element was defined as a specific type of dimeric parallel coiled-coil, termed the signaling helix (S helix), present in a wide range of signaling proteins (8). Sequence comparisons delimit a roughly 40-residue element with a conserved heptad repeat pattern (Fig. ​(Fig.2A).2A). Based on mutational analyses of Sln1p and other proteins, the S helix is suggested to function as a switch that prevents constitutive activation of adjacent output domains (8).The term “signaling helix” previously was used to define the α4-TM2 extended helix in MCPs (23, 33). Here, we use the term S helix to denote the element described by Anantharaman et al. (8).The NarX and NarQ sensors encompass four distinct modules (Fig. ​(Fig.1):1): the amino-terminal transmembrane signaling module, the signal conversion module (including the HAMP domain and S-helix element), the central module of unknown function, and the carboxyl-terminal transmitter module (62). The S-helix element presumably functions together with the HAMP domain in conducting ligand-responsive motions from the transmembrane signaling module to the central module, ultimately regulating transmitter module activity.Regulatory output by two-component sensors reflects opposing transmitter activities (reviewed in reference 55). Positive function results from transmitter autokinase activity; the resulting phosphosensor serves as a substrate for response regulator autophosphorylation. Negative function results from transmitter phosphatase activity, which accelerates phosphoresponse regulator autodephosphorylation (reviewed in references 64 and 65). We envision a homogeneous two-state model for NarX (17), in which the equilibrium between these mutually exclusive conformations is modulated by ligand-responsive signaling.Previous work from our laboratory concerned the NarX and other HAMP domains (9, 10, 26, 77) and separately identified a conserved sequence in NarX and NarQ sensors, the Y box, that roughly corresponds to the S helix (62). Therefore, we were interested to explore the NarX S helix and to test some of the predictions made for its function. Results show that the S helix is critical for signal conduction and suggest that it functions as an extension of the HAMP HD2 α-helix in a subset of sensors exemplified by Sln1p and NarX. Moreover, a stutter discontinuity in the heptad repeat pattern was found to be essential for the NarX response to signal and to be conserved in several distinct classes of HAMP-containing sensors.     

Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Production of Novel Cyanophycins with an Extended Range of Constituent Amino Acids

Cyanophycin (multi-l-arginyl-poly-l-aspartic acid; also known as cyanophycin grana peptide [CGP]) is a putative precursor for numerous biodegradable technically used chemicals. Therefore, the biosynthesis and production of the polymer in recombinant organisms is of special interest. The synthesis of cyanophycin derivatives consisting of a wider range of constituents would broaden the applications of this polymer. We applied recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains defective in arginine metabolism and expressing the cyanophycin synthetase of Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6308 in order to synthesize CGP with citrulline and ornithine as constituents. Strains defective in arginine degradation (Car1 and Car2) accumulated up to 4% (wt/wt) CGP, whereas strains defective in arginine synthesis (Arg1, Arg3, and Arg4) accumulated up to 15.3% (wt/wt) of CGP, which is more than twofold higher than the previously content reported in yeast and the highest content ever reported in eukaryotes. Characterization of the isolated polymers by different analytical methods indicated that CGP synthesized by strain Arg1 (with argininosuccinate synthetase deleted) consisted of up to 20 mol% of citrulline, whereas CGP from strain Arg3 (with ornithine carbamoyltransferase deleted) consisted of up to 8 mol% of ornithine, and CGP isolated from strain Arg4 (with argininosuccinate lyase deleted) consisted of up to 16 mol% lysine. Cultivation experiments indicated that the incorporation of citrulline or ornithine is enhanced by the addition of low amounts of arginine (2 mM) and also by the addition of ornithine or citrulline (10 to 40 mM), respectively, to the medium.Cyanophycin (multi-l-arginyl-poly-[l-aspartic acid]), also referred to as cyanophycin grana peptide (CGP), represents a polydisperse nonribosomally synthesized polypeptide consisting of poly(aspartic acid) as backbone and arginine residues bound to each aspartate (49) (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). One enzyme only, referred to as cyanophycin synthetase (CphA), catalyzes the synthesis of the polymer from amino acids (55). Several CphAs originating from different bacteria exhibit specific features (2, 7, 5, 32, 50, 51). CphAs from the cyanobacteria Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6308 and Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413, respectively, exhibit a wide substrate range in vitro (2, 7), whereas CphA from Acinetobacter baylyi or Nostoc ellipsosporum incorporates only aspartate and arginine (23, 24, 32). CphA from Thermosynechococcus elongatus catalyzes the synthesis of CGP primer independently (5); CphA from Synechococcus sp. strain MA19 exhibits high thermostability (22). Furthermore, two types of CGP were observed concerning its solubility behavior: (i) a water-insoluble type that becomes soluble at high or low pH (34, 48) and (ii) a water-soluble type that was only recently observed in recombinant organisms (19, 26, 42, 50, 56). In the past, bacteria were mainly applied for the synthesis of CGP (3, 14, 18, 53), whereas recently there has been greater interest in synthesis in eukaryotes (26, 42, 50). CGP was accumulated to almost 7% (wt/wt) of dry matter in recombinant Nicotiana tabacum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (26, 50).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Chemical structures of dipeptide building blocks of CGP variants detected in vivo. Structure: 1, aspartate-arginine; 2, aspartate-lysine; 3, aspartate-citrulline; 4, aspartate-ornithine. Aspartic acid is presented in black; the second amino acid of the dipeptide building blocks is shown in gray. The nomenclature of the carbon atoms is given.In S. cerevisiae the arginine metabolism is well understood and has been investigated (30) (see Fig. ​Fig.2).2). Arginine is synthesized from glutamate via ornithine and citrulline in eight successive steps. The enzymes acetylglutamate synthase, acetylglutamate kinase, N-acetyl-γ-glutamylphosphate reductase, and acetylornithine aminotransferase are involved in the formation of N-α-acetylornithine. The latter is converted to ornithine by acetylornithine acetyltransferase. In the next step, ornithine carbamoyltransferase (ARG3) condenses ornithine with carbamoylphosphate, yielding citrulline. Citrulline is then converted to l-argininosuccinate by argininosuccinate synthetase. The latter is in the final step cleaved into fumarate and arginine by argininosuccinate lyase (ARG4). The first five steps occur in the mitochondria, whereas the last three reactions occur in the cytosol (28, 54). Arginine degradation is initiated by arginase (CAR1) and ornithine aminotransferase (CAR2) (10, 11, 38, 39).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Schematic overview of the arginine metabolism in S. cerevisiae. Reactions shown in the shaded area occur in the mitochondria, while the other reactions are catalyzed in the cytosol. Abbreviations: ARG2, acetylglutamate synthase; ARG6, acetylglutamate kinase; ARG5, N-acetyl-γ-glutamyl-phosphate reductase; ARG8, acetylornithine aminotransferase; ECM40, acetylornithine acetyltransferase; ARG1, argininosuccinate synthetase; ARG3, ornithine carbamoyltransferase; ARG4, argininosuccinate lyase; CAR1, arginase; CAR2, ornithine aminotransferase.A multitude of putative applications for CGP derivatives are available (29, 41, 45, 47), thus indicating a need for efficient biotechnological production and for further investigations concerning the synthesis of CGP with alternative properties and different constituents. It is not only the putative application of the polymer as a precursor for poly(aspartic acid), which is used as biodegradable alternative for poly(acrylic acid) or for bulk chemicals, that makes CGP interesting (29, 45-47). In addition, a recently developed process for the production of dipeptides from CGP as a precursor makes the synthesis of CGP variants worthwhile (43). Dipeptides play an important role in medicine and pharmacy, e.g., as additives for malnourished patients, as treatments against liver diseases, or as aids for muscle proliferation (43). Because dipeptides are synthesized chemically (40) or enzymatically (6), novel biotechnological production processes are welcome.     

Conserved and Variable Features of Gag Structure and Arrangement in Immature Retrovirus Particles

The assembly of retroviruses is driven by oligomerization of the Gag polyprotein. We have used cryo-electron tomography together with subtomogram averaging to describe the three-dimensional structure of in vitro-assembled Gag particles from human immunodeficiency virus, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, and Rous sarcoma virus. These represent three different retroviral genera: the lentiviruses, betaretroviruses and alpharetroviruses. Comparison of the three structures reveals the features of the supramolecular organization of Gag that are conserved between genera and therefore reflect general principles of Gag-Gag interactions and the features that are specific to certain genera. All three Gag proteins assemble to form approximately spherical hexameric lattices with irregular defects. In all three genera, the N-terminal domain of CA is arranged in hexameric rings around large holes. Where the rings meet, 2-fold densities, assigned to the C-terminal domain of CA, extend between adjacent rings, and link together at the 6-fold symmetry axis with a density, which extends toward the center of the particle into the nucleic acid layer. Although this general arrangement is conserved, differences can be seen throughout the CA and spacer peptide regions. These differences can be related to sequence differences among the genera. We conclude that the arrangement of the structural domains of CA is well conserved across genera, whereas the relationship between CA, the spacer peptide region, and the nucleic acid is more specific to each genus.Retrovirus assembly is driven by the oligomerization of Gag, a multidomain protein, including an N-terminal membrane binding domain (MA), a two-domain structural component (CA), and an RNA binding domain (NC). The Gag proteins of all orthoretroviruses, including the alpha-, beta-, and lentiretroviruses discussed here, share this conserved modular architecture (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Despite very weak sequence conservation, the tertiary structures of MA, CA, and NC are conserved among retroviruses. Outside these conserved domains the Gag proteins of different retroviruses exhibit substantial variability. Other domains may be present or absent, and the length and sequence of linker peptides may also vary (12) (Fig. ​(Fig.11).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Modular architecture of the full-length Gag proteins of HIV, M-PMV, and RSV. White rectangles illustrate Gag polyprotein cleavage products. The extent of the constructs used in the electron microscopic analysis is specified under each protein as a black rectangle. Gray triangles specify cleavage sites. Residue numbers are counted from the beginning of Gag.Oligomerization of Gag in an infected cell leads to the formation of roughly spherical immature virus particles, where Gag is arranged in a radial fashion with the N-terminal MA domain associated with a surrounding lipid bilayer, and the more C-terminal NC pointing toward the center of the particle (15, 44, 46). Subsequent multiple cleavages of Gag by the viral protease lead to a rearrangement of the virus. NC and the RNA condense in the center of the particle, CA assembles into a capsid or shell around the nucleoprotein, and MA remains associated with the viral membrane. This proteolytic maturation is required to generate an infectious virion (2). In contrast to the mature CA lattice, which has been extensively studied (11, 16, 36), the Gag lattice in immature particles is incompletely understood.Gag itself contains all of the necessary determinants for particle assembly. For example, the expression of Gag alone in an insect cell expression system is sufficient to generate viruslike particles (3, 17, 22, 38). Retroviral Gag proteins also can be assembled in vitro in the presence of nucleic acids to form spherical particles (9, 19, 39, 43, 47). The arrangement of Gag within these in vitro-assembled Gag particles is indistinguishable from that found in immature virus particles (6), and the in vitro assembly systems have proved valuable for unraveling the principles of virus assembly (18, 28, 29, 39). Multiple layers of interaction promote the assembly of Gag in vivo, including MA-membrane-MA interactions, CA-CA interactions, and NC-RNA-NC interactions. An extensive body of literature has explored which regions of Gag are required for assembly and which can be replaced or deleted without compromising assembly. MA-membrane-MA interactions contribute but are not essential. NC-RNA-NC interactions appear to function to nonspecifically link Gag molecules together and can be replaced both in vivo and in vitro by other interaction domains such as leucine zippers (4, 13, 20, 32, 48). The C-terminal domain of CA (referred to here as C-CA) and the stretch of amino acids immediately following this domain (termed the spacer peptide [SP] region) are critical for assembly and sensitive to mutation (1, 22, 27, 30).We set out to understand how the substantial sequence variation among Gag proteins in different retroviruses is manifested in structural differences in the immature Gag lattice. To do this, we studied three retroviruses from different genera: the lentivirus human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the betaretrovirus Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (M-PMV), and the alpharetrovirus Rous sarcoma virus (RSV). These retroviruses are those for which in vitro assembly was first established and has been most extensively studied (6, 19, 24, 28, 29, 35, 43, 47).The domain structures of the three retroviruses differ most substantially upstream of CA. Both M-PMV and RSV have domains located between MA and CA that are absent in HIV (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). In M-PMV there are 198 residues forming the pp24 and p12 domains; in RSV there are 84 residues forming the p2a, p2b, and p10 domains. The three retroviruses have different requirements for regions upstream of CA during assembly. The C-terminal 25 residues of p10 are essential for proper immature RSV assembly, both in vitro and in vivo, and these residues are inferred to interact directly with N-CA to stabilize the hexamer by forming contacts between adjacent N-CA domains (35). An equivalent assembly domain has not been described for other retroviruses. Within M-PMV p12 is the so-called internal scaffolding domain that is not essential for assembly in vitro (43) but is required for particle assembly when the precursor is expressed under the control of the M-PMV promoter (41). It is a key domain for the membrane-independent assembly of immature capsids (40).In HIV, five residues upstream of CA must be present for assembly of immature virus-like spherical particles in vitro, although larger upstream extensions, including part of MA, are required for efficient assembly of regular particles, both for HIV and RSV. For HIV, if the entire MA domain is included, in vitro assembly requires the presence of inositol penta- or hexakis phosphate (8). If no sequences upstream of CA are present, the in vitro particles in both of these viruses adopt a mature-type tubular morphology (10, 18). It has been hypothesized that cleavage at the N terminus of N-CA during maturation leads to the N-terminal residues of CA folding back into the N-CA structure to form a β-hairpin. The β-hairpin is important for assembly of the mature CA lattice, whereas its absence is important for immature assembly (23, 42). These requirements explain why, in HIV and RSV, immature Gag lattice-like structures are formed only if regions upstream of CA are present (18). In M-PMV, an immature Gag lattice can be produced when the regions upstream of CA are deleted if this is combined with mutations (such as deleting the initial proline of CA), which prevent β-hairpin formation (43).During maturation, HIV and RSV Gag proteins are cleaved twice between CA and NC to release a small peptide called SP1 or SP. In RSV the most N-terminal of these two cleavages can occur at one of two possible positions such that the released peptide is either 9 or 12 amino acids long (33). In M-PMV only one cleavage occurs between CA and NC, and no short peptide is produced. The region between the final helix of CA and the Zn fingers has been proposed to adopt a helical bundle architecture in HIV and RSV based on bioinformatic prediction, on mutational analysis, and on structural studies (1, 22, 27, 45). In all three viruses, C-CA and the residues immediately downstream are critical for assembly and are sensitive to mutation. C-CA contains the major homology region, a group of residues that are highly conserved across the retroviruses.Cryo-electron tomography (cET) studies of immature virus particles (6, 45) have resolved the electron density of the HIV Gag lattice in three dimensions at low resolution. Using these methods, we have also described the three-dimensional architecture of in vitro-assembled HIV Gag particles (6). In immature viruses and in vitro-assembled particles, Gag is seen to adopt an 8 nm hexameric lattice, as was predicted from previous Fourier analysis of two-dimensional images (7, 46). The hexameric lattice is interrupted by irregularly shaped holes and cracks in the lattice (6, 45). A similar observation has been made using AFM of in vitro-assembled particles of M-PMV Gag (26). These holes and cracks allow an otherwise planar hexameric lattice to form the surface of an approximately spherical particle.The radial positions of the MA, CA, and NC domains had been assigned previously from cryo-electron micrographs (44, 46). Based on these assignments and the shape of the density, the position and relative orientations of CA domains can be modeled into the low-resolution structure of the HIV lattice (6, 45). Density ascribed to the N-terminal domain of CA (N-CA) forms rings around large holes at the 6-fold symmetry positions in the lattice. Below this layer, at the expected radius of the C-CA, are 2-fold densities, interpreted as corresponding to dimers of C-CA. These densities are linked by rodlike densities, which descend into the NC-nucleic acid layer.HIV is the only retrovirus for which the arrangement of Gag in the immature particle has been described in three dimensions. Prior to this work, important open questions were therefore: which features of the arrangement of Gag are conserved between genera and therefore reflect general principles of Gag-Gag interactions, and which features are specific to certain genera? We have applied subtomogram averaging of cryo-electron tomograms to generate reconstructions of in vitro-assembled Gag particles from HIV, M-PMV, and RSV. These allow identification of the general and variable features of the arrangement of Gag and the architecture of immature retroviruses.     

Impact of Quaternary Organization on the Antigenic Structure of the Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Envelope Glycoprotein E

The envelope protein E of flaviviruses mediates both receptor-binding and membrane fusion. At the virion surface, 180 copies of E are tightly packed and organized in a herringbone-like icosahedral structure, whereas in noninfectious subviral particles, 60 copies are arranged in a T=1 icosahedral symmetry. In both cases, the basic building block is an E dimer which exposes the binding sites for neutralizing antibodies at its surface. It was the objective of our study to assess the dependence of the antigenic structure of E on its quaternary arrangement, i.e., as part of virions, recombinant subviral particles, or soluble dimers. For this purpose, we used a panel of 11 E protein-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, mapped to distinct epitopes in each of the three E protein domains, and studied their reactivity with the different soluble and particulate forms of tick-borne encephalitis virus E protein under nondenaturing immunoassay conditions. Significant differences in the reactivities with these forms were observed that could be related to (i) limited access of certain epitopes at the virion surface; (ii) limited occupancy of epitopes in virions due to steric hindrance between antibodies; (iii) differences in the avidity to soluble forms compared to the virion, presumably related to the flexibility of E at its domain junctions; and (iv) modulations of the external E protein surface through interactions with its stem-anchor structure. We have thus identified several important factors that influence the antigenicity of the flavivirus E protein and have an impact on the interaction with neutralizing antibodies.Flaviviruses form a genus in the family Flaviviridae (52) and comprise a number of important human pathogens such as yellow fever, dengue, Japanese encephalitis, West Nile, and tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) viruses (30). They are small, enveloped viruses with only three structural proteins, designated C (capsid), M (membrane), and E (envelope). The E protein is oriented parallel to the viral membrane and forms a head-to-tail homodimeric complex (Fig. 1A and B). The structure of the E ectodomain (soluble E [sE])—consisting of about 400 amino acids and lacking the 100 C-terminal amino acids (including the so-called stem and two transmembrane helices)—has been determined by X-ray crystallography for several flaviviruses (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (25, 34, 36, 38, 44, 55). Both of the essential entry functions—receptor-binding and membrane fusion after uptake by receptor-mediated endocytosis—are mediated by E, which is therefore the primary target for virus-neutralizing antibodies (11, 42, 43, 45).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Structures and schematic representations of the TBE virus E protein, virions, and RSPs. In all panels, DI, DII, and DIII of the E protein are shown in red, yellow, and blue, respectively, and the fusion peptide (FP) is in orange. (A) Ribbon diagram of the sE dimer (top view). (B) Schematic of the full-length E dimer in a top view (upper panel) and side view (lower panel). The position of the two transmembrane helices of the membrane anchor and the two helices of the stem are based on Zhang et al. (54) and are shown in green and purple, respectively. (C) Pseudo-atomic structure of the virion based on cryo-EM reconstructions of dengue and West Nile viruses (27, 37, 54). One of the 30 rafts, each consisting of three parallel dimers, is highlighted. DIIIs of three monomers belonging to one icosahedral asymmetric unit are labeled by white stars. (D) Pseudo-atomic structure of RSP based on cryo-EM reconstructions (12).As revealed by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), mature infectious virions have smooth surfaces, comparable to a golf ball (27, 37). Their envelopes are icosahedrally symmetric and consist of a closed shell of 180 E monomers that are arranged in a herringbone-like pattern of 30 rafts of three dimers each (Fig. ​(Fig.1C)1C) (27). On the other hand, capsid-lacking subviral particles, which can be produced in recombinant form by the coexpression of prM and E, have a different symmetry, with 30 E dimers in a T=1 icosahedral structure (Fig. ​(Fig.1D)1D) (12, 49).The peculiar organization of E in virions is reminiscent of the tight packing of capsid proteins in nonenveloped viruses, for which it was shown that the native antigenic structure is strongly dependent on the intact capsid structure and not completely represented by isolated forms of capsid proteins (1, 41, 53). Such modulations of antigenic structure may be due to conformational changes in the course of packaging the capsid proteins into virions and/or to the fact that antibody binding sites at the virion surface are composed of residues that come together only through the juxtaposition of capsid proteins or neighboring protein subunits. Even in the case of spiky viral envelope proteins, the dependence of certain epitopes on the quaternary organization of the envelope glycoproteins has been described (8, 47).For flaviviruses, structural studies provide evidence for the considerable flexibility of E, especially at the junctions between the individual domains I, II, and III (DI, DII, and DIII) (7, 35, 55), suggesting that soluble forms may display differences in antigenic structure compared to those fixed in the closed envelope shell of whole virions. Furthermore, because of the tight packing of E at the virion surface, certain epitopes may be cryptic in the context of whole virus particles but accessible in soluble forms of E (40, 51).Studies on the antigenic structure of flaviviruses have used different antigen preparations including virions, recombinant subviral particles (RSPs), and soluble forms and subunits of E (10, 15-17, 32, 39, 40, 46, 49, 51), but so far no systematic comparative analysis of E in different physical forms and quaternary arrangements has been conducted. It was therefore the objective of our study, using TBE virus as a model, to investigate possible structural and/or antigenic differences between (i) soluble dimeric forms of E, including C-terminally truncated sE and detergent-solubilized full-length E (Fig. 1A and B); (ii) E in the context of whole virions (Fig. ​(Fig.1C);1C); and (iii) E in the context of RSPs (Fig. ​(Fig.1D).1D). For this purpose we used, and further characterized, a set of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to each of the three domains of E. All of these MAbs have neutralizing activity (17, 24) and therefore, by definition, react with infectious virions.Through these analyses, we demonstrate that the reactivity of several MAbs is significantly dependent on the quaternary arrangement of E and differs between virions, RSPs, and/or sE dimers. We thus provide evidence for previously unrecognized structural factors that have an impact on the antigenicity of the flavivirus E protein.     

Anterograde Spread of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Requires Glycoprotein E and Glycoprotein I but Not Us9

Anterograde neuronal spread (i.e., spread from the neuron cell body toward the axon terminus) is a critical component of the alphaherpesvirus life cycle. Three viral proteins, gE, gI, and Us9, have been implicated in alphaherpesvirus anterograde spread in several animal models and neuron culture systems. We sought to better define the roles of gE, gI, and Us9 in herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) anterograde spread using a compartmentalized primary neuron culture system. We found that no anterograde spread occurred in the absence of gE or gI, indicating that these proteins are essential for HSV-1 anterograde spread. However, we did detect anterograde spread in the absence of Us9 using two independent Us9-deleted viruses. We confirmed the Us9 finding in different murine models of neuronal spread. We examined viral transport into the optic nerve and spread to the brain after retinal infection; the production of zosteriform disease after flank inoculation; and viral spread to the spinal cord after flank inoculation. In all models, anterograde spread occurred in the absence of Us9, although in some cases at reduced levels. This finding contrasts with gE- and gI-deleted viruses, which displayed no anterograde spread in any animal model. Thus, gE and gI are essential for HSV-1 anterograde spread, while Us9 is dispensable.Alphaherpesviruses are parasites of the peripheral nervous system. In their natural hosts, alphaherpesviruses establish lifelong persistent infections in sensory ganglia and periodically return by axonal transport to the periphery, where they cause recurrent disease. This life cycle requires viral transport along axons in two directions. Axonal transport in the retrograde direction (toward the neuron cell body) occurs during neuroinvasion and is required for the establishment of latency, while transport in the anterograde direction (away from the neuron cell body) occurs after reactivation and is required for viral spread to the periphery to cause recurrent disease. In addition to anterograde and retrograde axonal transport within neurons, alphaherpesviruses spread between synaptically connected neurons and between neurons and epithelial cells at the periphery (19, 22).The alphaherpesvirus subfamily includes the human pathogens herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, and varicella-zoster virus (VZV), as well as numerous veterinary pathogens such as pseudorabies virus (PRV) and bovine herpesviruses 1 and 5 (BHV-1 and BHV-5). The molecular mechanisms that mediate alphaherpesvirus anterograde axonal transport, anterograde spread, and cell-to-cell spread remain unclear. However, many studies of several alphaherpesviruses have indicated that anterograde transport or anterograde spread involves the viral proteins glycoprotein E (gE), glycoprotein I (gI), and Us9 (2, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 26, 30, 31, 41, 46, 51, 52).Glycoproteins E and I are type I membrane proteins that form a heterodimer in the virion membrane and on the surface of infected cells. Although dispensable for the entry of extracellular virus, gE and gI mediate the epithelial cell-to-cell spread of numerous alphaherpesviruses (1, 3, 15, 20, 34, 38, 49, 53, 54). Us9 is a type II nonglycosylated membrane protein with no described biological activity apart from its role in neuronal transport (4, 18, 32). Here, we used several model systems to better characterize the roles of gE, gI, and Us9 in HSV-1 neuronal spread.Animal models to assess alphaherpesvirus neuronal transport (viral movement within a neuron) and spread (viral movement between cells) include the mouse flank and mouse retina models of infection. In the mouse flank model (Fig. ​(Fig.1A),1A), virus is scratch inoculated onto the depilated flank, where it infects the skin and spreads to innervating sensory neurons. The virus travels to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in the spinal cord (retrograde direction) and then returns to an entire dermatome of skin (anterograde spread). The virus also is transported in an anterograde direction from the DRG to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and subsequently spreads to synaptically connected neurons. The production of zosteriform lesions and the presence of viral antigens in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord both are indicators of anterograde spread in this system. PRV gE and Us9 are required for the production of zosteriform disease, while gI is dispensable (7). In the absence of gE, HSV-1 also fails to cause zosteriform disease. However, unlike PRV, HSV-1 gE is required for retrograde spread to the DRG, so the role of gE in HSV-1 anterograde spread could not be evaluated in the mouse flank model (8, 36, 42).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Model systems to study HSV-1 neuronal spread. (A) Mouse flank model. Virus was scratch inoculated onto the skin, where it replicates, spreads to innervating neurons, and travels in a retrograde direction to the neuron cell body in the DRG. After replicating in the DRG, the virus travels in an anterograde direction back to the skin and into the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Motor neurons also innervate the skin, allowing virus to reach the ventral horn of the spinal cord by retrograde transport. (B) Mouse retina model. Virus is injected into the vitreous body, from which it infects the retina as well as other structures of the eye, including the ciliary body, iris, and skeletal muscles of the orbit. From the retina, the virus is transported into the optic nerve and optic tract (OT) (anterograde direction) and then to the brain along visual pathways. Anterograde spread is detected in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and superior colliculus (SC). From the infected ciliary body, iris, and skeletal muscle, the virus spreads in a retrograde direction along motor and parasympathetic neurons and is detected in the oculomotor and Edinger-Westphal nuclei (OMN/EWN). Only first-order sites of spread to the brain are indicated. (Brain images were modified and reproduced from reference 47 with permission from of the publisher. Copyright Elsevier 1992.) (C) Campenot chamber system. Campenot chambers consist of a Teflon ring that divides the culture into three separate compartments. Neurons are seeded into the S chamber and extend their axons into the M and N chambers. Vero cells are seeded into the N chamber 1 day before infection. Virus is added to the S chamber and detected in the N chamber, a measure of anterograde spread.The mouse retina infection model (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) has the advantage of allowing anterograde and retrograde spread to be studied independently of one another. Virus is delivered to the vitreous body, from which it infects the retina and other structures of the eye. The cell bodies of retinal neurons form the innermost layer of the retina; therefore, the virus infects these neurons directly, and spread from the retina along visual pathways to the brain occurs in an exclusively anterograde direction. In addition, the virus infects the anterior uveal layer of the eye (ciliary body and iris) and skeletal muscles in the orbit. From these tissues, the virus infects innervating parasympathetic and motor neurons and spreads to the brain in a retrograde direction. The localization of viral antigens in specific brain sites indicates whether the virus traveled to the brain along an anterograde or retrograde pathway (21, 25, 26, 39, 44, 51). PRV gE, gI, and Us9 each are essential for anterograde spread to the brain yet are dispensable for retrograde spread (5, 11, 25, 52). Even a strain of PRV lacking all three of these proteins retains retrograde neuronal spread activity (12, 40, 44). In contrast, in the absence of gE, HSV-1 fails to spread to the brain by either the anterograde or retrograde pathway (51).The Campenot chamber system (Fig. ​(Fig.1C)1C) has the advantage of allowing quantitative measurement of anterograde spread. Sympathetic neurons are cultured in a tripartite ring in which neuron cell bodies are contained in a separate compartment from their neurites. Virus is added to neuron cell bodies in one chamber, and anterograde spread to a separate chamber is measured by viral titers (13, 29, 30, 39, 43). Using this system, gEnull, gInull, and Us9null PRV each were shown to have only a partial defect in anterograde spread, while a virus lacking all three proteins was totally defective (13).We sought to quantify the anterograde spread activity of gEnull, gInull, and Us9null HSV-1 using the Campenot chamber system. While gEnull and gInull viruses were completely defective at anterograde spread, we found that a Us9null virus retained wild-type (WT) anterograde spread activity in this system. This observation was unexpected, since others previously had reported that Us9 is required for efficient HSV-1 anterograde transport or spread (26, 41, 46). Therefore, we further characterized the neuronal spread properties of two independent Us9-deleted viruses in the mouse retina and mouse flank models of infection. Our results indicate that gE and gI are essential for HSV-1 anterograde spread, whereas Us9 is dispensable.