A Single Immunization with CoVaccine HT-Adjuvanted H5N1 Influenza Virus Vaccine Induces Protective Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses in Ferrets

Highly pathogenic avian influenza A viruses of the H5N1 subtype continue to circulate in poultry, and zoonotic transmissions are reported frequently. Since a pandemic caused by these highly pathogenic viruses is still feared, there is interest in the development of influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines that can protect humans against infection, preferably after a single vaccination with a low dose of antigen. Here we describe the induction of humoral and cellular immune responses in ferrets after vaccination with a cell culture-derived whole inactivated influenza A virus vaccine in combination with the novel adjuvant CoVaccine HT. The addition of CoVaccine HT to the influenza A virus vaccine increased antibody responses to homologous and heterologous influenza A/H5N1 viruses and increased virus-specific cell-mediated immune responses. Ferrets vaccinated once with a whole-virus equivalent of 3.8 μg hemagglutinin (HA) and CoVaccine HT were protected against homologous challenge infection with influenza virus A/VN/1194/04. Furthermore, ferrets vaccinated once with the same vaccine/adjuvant combination were partially protected against infection with a heterologous virus derived from clade 2.1 of H5N1 influenza viruses. Thus, the use of the novel adjuvant CoVaccine HT with cell culture-derived inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus antigen is a promising and dose-sparing vaccine approach warranting further clinical evaluation.Since the first human case of infection with a highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus of the H5N1 subtype in 1997 (9, 10, 37), hundreds of zoonotic transmissions have been reported, with a high case-fatality rate (10, 44). Since these viruses continue to circulate among domestic birds and human cases are regularly reported, it is feared that they will adapt to their new host or exchange gene segments with other influenza A viruses, become transmissible from human to human, and cause a new pandemic. Recently, a novel influenza A virus of the H1N1 subtype emerged. This virus, which originated from pigs, was transmitted between humans efficiently, resulting in the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century (8, 45). Although millions of people have been inoculated with the (H1N1)2009 virus, the case-fatality rate was relatively low compared to that for infections with the H5N1 viruses (11, 31). However, the unexpected pandemic caused by influenza A/H1N1(2009) viruses has further highlighted the importance of rapid availability of safe and effective pandemic influenza virus vaccines. Other key issues for the development of pandemic influenza A virus vaccines include optimal use of the existing (limited) capacity for production of viral antigen and effectiveness against viruses that are antigenically distinct. Ideally, a single administration of a low dose of antigen would be sufficient to induce protective immunity against the homologous strain and heterologous antigenic variant strains. However, since the population at large will be immunologically naïve to a newly introduced virus, high doses of antigen are required to induce protective immunity in unprimed subjects (23, 36). The use of safe and effective adjuvants in pandemic influenza virus vaccines is considered a dose-sparing strategy. Clinical trials evaluating candidate inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines showed that the use of adjuvants can increase their immunogenicity and broaden the specificity of the induced antibody responses (2, 7, 19, 23, 27, 36, 41). These research efforts have resulted in the licensing of adjuvanted vaccines against seasonal and pandemic influenza viruses (17). The protective efficacy of immune responses induced with candidate influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccines was demonstrated in ferrets after two immunizations (1, 22, 24, 25) or after a single immunization. The latter was achieved with a low dose of antigen in combination with the adjuvant Iscomatrix (26).Recently, a novel adjuvant that consists of a sucrose fatty acid sulfate ester (SFASE) immobilized on the oil droplets of a submicrometer emulsion of squalane in water has been developed (4). It has been demonstrated that the addition of this novel adjuvant, called CoVaccine HT, to multiple antigens increased the immune response to these antigens in pigs and horses and was well tolerated in both species (4, 16, 40). Furthermore, it was shown that the use of CoVaccine HT increased the virus-specific antibody responses in mice and ferrets after vaccination with a cell culture-derived whole inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus vaccine (5, 13). One of the mode of actions of CoVaccine HT is the activation of antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells, most likely through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling (5).In the present study, we evaluated the protective potential of CoVaccine HT-adjuvanted cell culture-derived whole inactivated influenza A/H5N1 virus (WIV) vaccine in the ferret model, which is considered the most suitable animal model for the evaluation of candidate influenza virus vaccines (6, 14, 15). To this end, ferrets were vaccinated once or twice with various antigen doses with or without the adjuvant to test whether dose sparing could be achieved. The use of CoVaccine HT increased virus-specific antibody responses and T cell responses. A single administration of 3.8 μg hemagglutinin (HA) of WIV NIBRG-14 vaccine preparation in combination with CoVaccine HT conferred protection against challenge infection with the homologous highly pathogenic A/H5N1 virus strain A/VN/1194/04 and partial protection against infection with a heterologous, antigenically distinct strain, A/IND/5/05. Therefore, it was concluded that the use of CoVaccine HT in inactivated influenza virus vaccines induced protective virus-specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses and that it could be suitable as adjuvant in (pre)pandemic A/H5N1 virus vaccines. Further clinical testing of these candidate vaccines seems to be warranted.     

Evaluation of Replication and Cross-Reactive Antibody Responses of H2 Subtype Influenza Viruses in Mice and Ferrets

H2 influenza viruses have not circulated in humans since 1968, and therefore a large segment of the population would likely be susceptible to infection should H2 influenza viruses reemerge. The development of an H2 pandemic influenza virus vaccine candidate should therefore be considered a priority in pandemic influenza preparedness planning. We selected a group of geographically and temporally diverse wild-type H2 influenza viruses and evaluated the kinetics of replication and compared the ability of these viruses to induce a broadly cross-reactive antibody response in mice and ferrets. In both mice and ferrets, A/Japan/305/1957 (H2N2), A/mallard/NY/1978 (H2N2), and A/swine/MO/2006 (H2N3) elicited the broadest cross-reactive antibody responses against heterologous H2 influenza viruses as measured by hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays. These data suggested that these three viruses may be suitable candidates for development as live attenuated H2 pandemic influenza virus vaccines.Influenza pandemics occur when a novel influenza virus enters a population with little preexisting immunity (36). During the pandemics of the last century, novel influenza viruses were introduced either directly from an avian reservoir (34) or were the result of reassortment between contemporaneously circulating human, avian, and swine influenza viruses (5, 29, 36). Due to the lack of preexisting immunity to the novel virus, morbidity and mortality rates are typically higher than in epidemics caused by seasonal influenza viruses (4).Although pandemic preparedness planning has largely focused on the highly pathogenic H5 and H7 avian influenza virus subtypes, the recent emergence of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 viruses underscores the need to consider other influenza virus subtypes as well. Of the 16 hemagglutinin (HA) influenza A virus subtypes that have been identified to date, H1, H2, and H3 have been known to cause influenza pandemics (7, 27), suggesting that these viruses are capable of sustained transmission and can cause disease in humans. While the H1 and H3 subtypes have cocirculated in humans since 1977, H2 influenza viruses have not circulated in humans since 1968 (36) and therefore a large segment of the population would likely be susceptible to infection should H2 influenza viruses reemerge. The 1957 H2 pandemic virus was a reassortant that derived the HA, neuraminidase (NA), and PB1 genes from an avian virus and the remaining gene segments from the circulating H1N1 virus (15, 30). As H2 subtype viruses continue to circulate in avian reservoirs worldwide (12, 17, 18, 22, 33), they remain a potential pandemic threat. The development of an H2 influenza virus vaccine candidate should therefore be considered a priority in future pandemic influenza preparedness planning.Given the low likelihood that a previously selected vaccine virus will exactly match the pandemic virus, the ability to elicit a broadly cross-reactive antibody response to antigenically distinct viruses within a subtype is an important consideration in the selection of a pandemic influenza vaccine candidate. Previous studies have examined the ability of inactivated H2 influenza viruses to provide cross-protection against mouse-adapted variants of reassortant human viruses and an avian H2 influenza virus from 1978 (9, 14). Given the potential for live attenuated influenza virus vaccines to confer a great breadth of heterologous cross-protection (1, 2, 6, 35), we recently conducted a study evaluating cold-adapted A/Ann Arbor/6/1960 (AA CA), an H2 influenza virus used as the backbone of the seasonal live attenuated influenza A virus vaccine currently licensed in the United States (3). However, as H2 influenza virus continues to circulate widely and appear in migratory birds (10, 24, 26), in poultry markets (20), and in swine (21), with evidence of interregional gene transmission (19, 22), a more extensive evaluation of recent isolates may be warranted in the selection of a potential H2 pandemic vaccine candidate.H2 influenza viruses fall into three main lineages: a human lineage, a North American avian lineage, and a Eurasian avian lineage (29). In addition to viruses whose replicative ability in mammals has previously been established (11, 21, 23, 25), we selected a group of geographically and temporally diverse H2 influenza viruses from each lineage. We evaluated the kinetics of replication of each of these viruses in mice and ferrets and compared the abilities of these viruses to induce a broadly cross-reactive antibody response to determine which of these viruses would be suitable for further development as an H2 pandemic influenza vaccine candidate.     

Neutralizing Epitopes of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin: Target for the Development of a Universal Vaccine against H5N1 Lineages

The nature of influenza virus to randomly mutate and evolve into new types with diverse antigenic determinants is an important challenge in the control of influenza infection. Particularly, variations within the amino acid sequences of major neutralizing epitopes of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) hindered the development of universal vaccines against H5N1 lineages. Based on distribution analyses of the identified major neutralizing epitopes of hemagglutinin, we selected three vaccine strains that cover the entire variants in the neutralizing epitopes among the H5N1 lineages. HA proteins of selected vaccine strains were expressed on the baculovirus surface (BacHA), and the preclinical efficacy of the vaccine formulations was evaluated in a mouse model. The combination of three selected vaccine strains could effectively neutralize viruses from clades 1, 2.1, 2.2, 4, 7, and 8 of influenza H5N1 viruses. In contrast, a vaccine formulation containing only adjuvanted monovalent BacHA (mono-BacHA) or a single strain of inactivated whole viral vaccine was able to neutralize only clade 1 (homologous), clade 2.1, and clade 8.0 viruses. Also, the trivalent BacHA vaccine was able to protect 100% of the mice against challenge with three different clades (clade 1.0, clade 2.1, and clade 7.0) of H5N1 strains compared to mono-BacHA or inactivated whole viral vaccine. The present findings provide a rationale for the development of a universal vaccine against H5N1 lineages. Furthermore, baculoviruses displaying HA will serve as an ideal choice for a vaccine in prepandemic or pandemic situations and expedite vaccine technology without the requirement of high-level-biocontainment facilities or tedious protein purification processes.The nature of influenza virus to randomly mutate and evolve into new types with diverse antigenic determinants is an important challenge in the control of influenza infection (20). This has been evidently recognized by the recent outbreaks of H5N1 avian influenza virus infection and the current pandemic situation with H1N1 swine-origin influenza A virus (S-OIV). In fact, it has been well documented in the literature that H5N1 had acquired the ability to infect human tissues due mainly to the occurrence of mutation events (1). Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 viruses are antigenically distinguishable owing to differences in hemagglutinin (HA) sequences, the principal determinant of immunity to influenza virus, resulting in different lineages or clades of H5N1 (13, 33). The control of infection with current H5N1 vaccines does not appear to be effective against heterologous strains or phylogenetically variant clades of H5N1 in part due to variations in the HA sequences, particularly within the neutralizing epitope region. Since present vaccines are based solely on the induction of neutralizing antibodies against these epitopes, differences in these sequences may render current vaccines unqualified for the prevention of influenza globally (15, 28, 31). To overcome such limitations and to completely realize the potential of vaccines worldwide, the concept of universal vaccines based on conserved viral proteins has recently been proposed. The highly conserved ion channel protein (M2) and the nucleoprotein (NP) of influenza virus have been evaluated for the induction of cross-protective cellular immunity and viral clearance (2, 35). Antibodies generated against these conserved proteins may reduce viral spread and accelerate recovery from influenza (14). However, antibodies specific to these proteins are poorly immunogenic and were found previously to be infection permissive (5-7, 13). Thus, the development of a vaccine based on influenza virus hemagglutinin appears to be the only viable option to prevent infections by HPAI viruses such as H5N1 viruses. Nevertheless, amino acid variations within the major antigenic neutralizing epitope regions among H5 subtypes restrict the development of such universal vaccines against different H5N1 lineages.The development of a universal vaccine based entirely on HA of influenza virus is still feasible, if the variation or conservation of neutralizing epitopes among the several HPAI H5N1 virus clades can be identified. An understanding of the distribution pattern of such neutralizing epitopes could help in the design of future vaccines by incorporating two or more ideal H5N1 strains in the vaccine composition. The neutralizing epitopes of the selected viral strains should cover the variations among most H5 subtypes in order to acquire broad-range protective immunity against most H5N1 subtypes. Previous attempts to identify amino acid substitutions within HA sequences of variants that escaped from neutralization by monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) revealed the neutralizing epitope sites of HA (9, 10). Along with previous findings, we report here the identification of other major neutralizing epitopes of H5N1 by mapping their amino acid sequences using neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (n-MAbs). Analysis of the distribution of all identified neutralizing epitopes among H5 subtypes revealed variations within the antigenic determinants of H5N1 subtypes from both human and avian sources. Based on these results, we have selected three vaccine strains comprising the major neutralizing epitopes of HA to cover the entire variants within H5N1 lineages. In order to test our hypothesis in vivo, HA proteins of selected vaccine strains were expressed on the baculovirus surface (BacHA), and the efficacy of the vaccine formulations was evaluated with a mouse model challenged with phylogenetically variant H5N1 strains.     

Nonreplicating Vaccinia Virus Vectors Expressing the H5 Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Produced in Modified Vero Cells Induce Robust Protection

The timely development of safe and effective vaccines against avian influenza virus of the H5N1 subtype will be of the utmost importance in the event of a pandemic. Our aim was first to develop a safe live vaccine which induces both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses against human H5N1 influenza viruses and second, since the supply of embryonated eggs for traditional influenza vaccine production may be endangered in a pandemic, an egg-independent production procedure based on a permanent cell line. In the present article, the generation of a complementing Vero cell line suitable for the production of safe poxviral vaccines is described. This cell line was used to produce a replication-deficient vaccinia virus vector H5N1 live vaccine, dVV-HA5, expressing the hemagglutinin of a virulent clade 1 H5N1 strain. This experimental vaccine was compared with a formalin-inactivated whole-virus vaccine based on the same clade and with different replicating poxvirus-vectored vaccines. Mice were immunized to assess protective immunity after high-dose challenge with the highly virulent A/Vietnam/1203/2004(H5N1) strain. A single dose of the defective live vaccine induced complete protection from lethal homologous virus challenge and also full cross-protection against clade 0 and 2 challenge viruses. Neutralizing antibody levels were comparable to those induced by the inactivated vaccine. Unlike the whole-virus vaccine, the dVV-HA5 vaccine induced substantial amounts of gamma interferon-secreting CD8 T cells. Thus, the nonreplicating recombinant vaccinia virus vectors are promising vaccine candidates that induce a broad immune response and can be produced in an egg-independent and adjuvant-independent manner in a proven vector system.Avian H5N1 influenza viruses, currently circulating mainly in southeast Asia, are likely to cause the next influenza pandemic (18, 26, 37). The supply of embryonated eggs for traditional influenza vaccine production may be endangered in this case. Efforts to produce inactivated H5N1 vaccines in permanent cells have resulted in large-scale manufacturing, for instance, in Vero cells (21). This approach, based either on fermentation of H5N1 wild-type (wt) viruses (21) or on viruses attenuated by reverse genetics (9, 31), is the most straightforward strategy for egg-independent, rapid vaccine production.A further approach that may result in more widely available, egg-independent H5 vaccines is the use of recombinant viral vectors expressing protective antigens. Promising protection results were obtained so far with adenovirus-based vectors in mouse models (13, 14). Adenovirus vectors are usually produced in permanent complementing cell lines (11) and have been widely used in clinical trials. Cancellation of a recent trial involving human immunodeficiency virus adenovirus vectors due to suspected enhancement of disease, however, may complicate the future use of these vectors (41). Poxvirus vectors, including recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) (1, 43), constitute a further class of vectors that have been used to express H5N1 influenza virus antigens (5, 22, 44, 46). Usually, however, the large-scale production of MVA is carried out in primary chicken cells, since these are the most efficient production substrates and are also accepted by regulators. In a pandemic, this production platform may not be available because permanent nontumorigenic avian cell lines are currently not available for production.In this study, we used a permanent cell line, modified Vero cells, to produce nonreplicating vaccinia virus vectors expressing the H5 hemagglutinin (HA), the major influenza virus protective antigen. The defective vaccinia virus (dVV) vectors are safe due to their lack of replication capacity in normal hosts, while they share the superior immunizing properties of poxviral live vaccines (15, 33). Previously, a permanent cell line based on rabbit kidney cells was engineered to express the essential vaccinia virus D4R gene encoding the enzyme uracil-DNA-glycosylase. This cell line allowed the construction of replication-deficient vaccinia virus vectors (15). In this work, a complementing system based on Vero cells was established and used to produce the defective vaccinia virus vector dVV-HA5. The vector was used to immunize mice and was compared to an inactivated whole-virus (whv) vaccine and to replicating control viruses. The dVV-HA5 candidate vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies and full protection, similar to results with an inactivated whv vaccine. Further, it is important to ensure that the immune responses generated by a pandemic influenza vaccine give long-lived, broad, cross-clade protection. While antibody responses to influenza virus provide protective immunity, T-cell responses are also thought to play an important role in clearance of and recovery from infections. Thus, a vaccine which can produce both effective humoral and T-cell responses would be advantageous. A vaccinia virus vector-based pandemic influenza vaccine has the potential to provide this advantage.     

An Adjuvant for the Induction of Potent,Protective Humoral Responses to an H5N1 Influenza Virus Vaccine with Antigen-Sparing Effect in Mice

Intramuscular administration of inactivated influenza virus vaccine is the main vaccine platform used for the prevention of seasonal influenza virus infection. In clinical trials, inactivated H5N1 vaccines have been shown to be safe and capable of eliciting immune correlates of protection. However, the H5N1 vaccines are poorly immunogenic compared to seasonal influenza virus vaccines. Needle-free vaccination would be more efficient and economical in a pandemic, and the development of an effective and safe mucosal adjuvant will be an important milestone. A stabilized chemical analog of double-stranded RNA, PIKA, was previously reported to be a potent mucosal adjuvant in a murine model. While PIKA stimulates dendritic cells in vitro, little was known about its receptor and adjuvanting mechanism in vivo. In this study, we demonstrated that the immunostimulatory effect of PIKA resulted in an increased number of mature antigen-presenting cells, with the induction of proinflammatory cytokines at the inoculation site. In addition, coadministration of PIKA with a poorly immunogenic H5N1 subunit vaccine led to antigen sparing and quantitative and qualitative improvements of the immune responses over those achieved with an unadjuvanted vaccine in mice. The adjuvanted vaccine provided protection against lethal challenge with homologous and heterologous H5N1 wild-type viruses. Mice lacking functional TLR3 showed diminished cytokine production with PIKA stimulation, diminished antibody responses, and reduced protective efficacy against wild-type virus challenge following vaccination. These data suggest that TLR3 is important for the optimal performance of PIKA as an adjuvant. With its good safety profile and antigen-sparing effect, PIKA could be an attractive adjuvant for use in future pandemics.Influenza is an acute respiratory disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The newly emerged swine-origin H1N1 virus has caused the first influenza pandemic of this century (4). Since its appearance in April 2009, the virus has spread to every continent and caused significant morbidity and mortality (WHO website, http://gamapserver.who.int/h1n1/cases-deaths/h1n1_casesdeaths.html). The sporadic transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses (H5N1 influenza A viruses) from poultry to humans in Asia also raises concerns about a possible pandemic (2, 28).Although vaccination is the most effective tool for the control of influenza (7, 33), the combined production capacity of global vaccine suppliers is not sufficient to meet the demand during a pandemic, so a vaccine shortage is expected. Any strategy that can maximize vaccine coverage will be valuable in a pandemic.Inactivated seasonal influenza virus vaccines are administered mainly by the intramuscular (i.m.) route; however, it has been demonstrated that intranasal (i.n.) administration of inactivated influenza virus vaccines is more effective at inducing nasal IgA responses and protecting the respiratory epithelium (1, 47). Induction of immunity by the intranasal route often requires a high dose of vaccine or the inclusion of an adjuvant. Although a number of compounds have been identified as promising mucosal adjuvants, there is a need to continue to develop safe mucosal adjuvants, because some compounds, such as Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin and poly(I:C), are associated with significant side effects (27, 37).We previously demonstrated the potency of a stabilized chemical analog of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), PIKA, as an adjuvant for a seasonal influenza virus vaccine with a substantial antigen-sparing effect in mice (25). While we and others have shown that PIKA activates dendritic cells (DC) in culture (25, 38), there are no reports on this effect in vivo, and the protective efficacy of PIKA-adjuvanted vaccine against wild-type (wt) virus challenge has not been demonstrated. The current study was designed to evaluate changes in the number and phenotypic expression of local antigen-presenting cells (APC) and in cytokine expression at the inoculation site and to evaluate the adjuvanting potency of PIKA in a lethal-challenge model using a wt influenza virus with pandemic potential. The A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) virus was chosen over the A/California/04/2009 (H1N1) virus as the challenge virus for two reasons. First, the H5N1 virus is more virulent than the 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus in mice (the 50% mouse lethal doses [MLD₅₀] of the H5N1 and the H1N1 viruses are 10^0.4 and 10^5.8 50% tissue culture infective doses [TCID₅₀], respectively [20, 41]), which allows a higher lethal-challenge dose to be used in the experiments. Second, the unadjuvanted split-virion H5N1 vaccine was poorly immunogenic in humans, requiring 12 times more antigen (two doses of 90 μg) than the typical seasonal influenza virus vaccine (15 μg) in order to generate immunity associated with protection against influenza in humans (42), while data from the H1N1 human vaccine trial show that the unadjuvanted H1N1 vaccine is able to elicit robust immune responses after a single dose (14, 51). Our results show that administration of PIKA with inactivated H5N1 vaccine elicited a rapid production of proinflammatory cytokines with infiltration of mature DC at the site of administration. This vaccine formulation allowed significant antigen sparing and provided protection against lethal challenge with the wt HPAI viruses A/Vietnam/1203/2004 and A/Indonesia/05/2005 (H5N1).     

Pandemic H1N1 2009 Influenza A Virus Induces Weak Cytokine Responses in Human Macrophages and Dendritic Cells and Is Highly Sensitive to the Antiviral Actions of Interferons

In less than 3 months after the first cases of swine origin 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infections were reported from Mexico, WHO declared a pandemic. The pandemic virus is antigenically distinct from seasonal influenza viruses, and the majority of human population lacks immunity against this virus. We have studied the activation of innate immune responses in pandemic virus-infected human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages. Pandemic A/Finland/553/2009 virus, representing a typical North American/European lineage virus, replicated very well in these cells. The pandemic virus, as well as the seasonal A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) and A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) viruses, induced type I (alpha/beta interferon [IFN-α/β]) and type III (IFN-λ1 to -λ3) IFN, CXCL10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) gene expression weakly in DCs. Mouse-adapted A/WSN/33 (H1N1) and human A/Udorn/72 (H3N2) viruses, instead, induced efficiently the expression of antiviral and proinflammatory genes. Both IFN-α and IFN-β inhibited the replication of the pandemic (H1N1) virus. The potential of IFN-λ3 to inhibit viral replication was lower than that of type I IFNs. However, the pandemic virus was more sensitive to the antiviral IFN-λ3 than the seasonal A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) virus. The present study demonstrates that the novel pandemic (H1N1) influenza A virus can readily replicate in human primary DCs and macrophages and efficiently avoid the activation of innate antiviral responses. It is, however, highly sensitive to the antiviral actions of IFNs, which may provide us an additional means to treat severe cases of infection especially if significant drug resistance emerges.The novel swine origin 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus was identified in April 2009, and it is currently causing the first influenza pandemic of the 21st century. The virus is a completely new reassortant virus (8, 38), and the majority of the human population does not have preexisting immunity against it. The case fatality rate of the current pandemic virus infection is still unclear, but it is estimated to be somewhat higher than that of seasonal influenza virus infections (8). In most cases, the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus causes an uncomplicated respiratory tract illness with symptoms similar to those caused by seasonal influenza viruses. However, gastrointestinal symptoms atypical to seasonal influenza have been detected in a significant proportion of cases (4, 7, 35).The pandemic 2009 (H1N1) influenza A virus originates from a swine influenza A virus strain. It underwent multiple reassortment events in pigs and then transferred into the human population (8, 38). The new virus has gene segments from the North American triple-reassortant and Eurasian swine H1N1 viruses (8, 38). Sequence analysis of this new pandemic virus revealed that hemagglutinin (HA), NP, and NS gene segments are derived from the classical swine viruses, PB1 from human H3N2, and PB2 and PA from avian viruses within the triple-reassortant virus (8). In addition, the NA and M segments originate from the Eurasian swine virus lineage. The pandemic 2009 (H1N1) virus is genetically and antigenically distinct from previous seasonal human influenza A (H1N1) viruses. Thus, the current seasonal influenza vaccines are likely to give little, if any, protection against pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus infection (12, 14). However, some evidence indicates that people born early in the 20th century have cross-neutralizing antibodies against the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) viruses (12, 14).At present, relatively little is known about the pathogenesis and transmission of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus in humans. Studies with ferrets revealed that the pandemic virus replicated better than seasonal H1N1 viruses in the respiratory tracts of the animals. This suggests that the virus is more pathogenic in ferrets than seasonal influenza viruses (19, 24). The respiratory tract is the primary infection site of all mammalian influenza viruses, and, indeed, the specific glycan receptors on the apical surface of the upper respiratory tract have been reported to bind HA of the 2009 A (H1N1) virus (19). In human lung tissue binding assays, 2009 A (H1N1) HA showed a glycan binding pattern similar to that of the HA from the pandemic 1918 A (H1N1) virus though its affinity to α2,6 glycans was much lower than that of the 1918 virus HA. The lower glycan binding properties of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus seemed to correlate with less-efficient transmission in ferrets compared to seasonal H1N1 viruses (19). According to another study with ferrets, the transmission of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus via respiratory droplets was as efficient as that of a seasonal A (H1N1) virus (24). It is clear that, besides experimental infections in animal models, analyses of the characters and pathogenesis of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus infection in humans are urgently needed.In the present study, we have focused on analyzing innate immune responses in primary human dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages in response to an infection with one of the Finnish isolates of the pandemic 2009 A (H1N1) virus. DCs and macrophages reside beneath the epithelium of the respiratory organs, and these cells are thus potential targets for influenza viruses. From the epithelial cells influenza viruses spread in DCs and macrophages, which coordinate the development of an effective innate immune response against the virus (22, 34, 41). During influenza virus infection, DCs and macrophages secrete antiviral cytokines such as interferons (IFNs) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (3, 13, 26). Moreover, DCs and macrophages activate virus-destroying NK cells and T cells with the cytokines they secrete and via direct cell-to-cell contacts (9, 29, 33, 37). Here we show that the pandemic (H1N1) virus infects and replicates very well in human monocyte-derived DCs and macrophages. The pandemic virus as well as two recent seasonal H1N1 viruses induced a relatively weak innate immune response in these cells, as evidenced by a poor expression of antiviral and proinflammatory cytokine genes. However, like seasonal influenza A viruses, the pandemic 2009 (H1N1) virus was extremely sensitive to the antiviral actions of type I IFNs (IFN-α/β). Interestingly, the pandemic 2009 (H1N1) virus was even more sensitive to antiviral IFN-λ3 than a seasonal A (H1N1) virus. Thus, IFNs may provide us with an additional means to combat severe pandemic influenza virus infections, especially if viral resistance against neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors begins to emerge.     

Elastase-Dependent Live Attenuated Swine Influenza A Viruses Are Immunogenic and Confer Protection against Swine Influenza A Virus Infection in Pigs

Influenza A viruses cause significant morbidity in swine, resulting in a substantial economic burden. Swine influenza virus (SIV) infection also poses important human public health concerns. Vaccination is the primary method for the prevention of influenza virus infection. Previously, we generated two elastase-dependent mutant SIVs derived from A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02(H1N1): A/Sw/Sk-R345V (R345V) and A/Sw/Sk-R345A (R345A). These two viruses are highly attenuated in pigs, making them good candidates for a live-virus vaccine. In this study, the immunogenicity and the ability of these candidates to protect against SIV infection were evaluated in pigs. We report that intratracheally administrated R345V and R345A induced antigen-specific humoral and cell-mediated immunity characterized by increased production of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies in the serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, high hemagglutination inhibition titers in serum, an enhanced level of lymphocyte proliferation, and higher numbers of gamma interferon-secreting cells at the site of infection. Based on the immunogenicity results, the R345V virus was further tested in a protection trial in which pigs were vaccinated twice with R345V and then challenged with homologous A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02, H1N1 antigenic variant A/Sw/Indiana/1726/88 or heterologous subtypic H3N2 A/Sw/Texas/4199-2/9/98. Our data showed that two vaccinations with R345V provided pigs with complete protection from homologous H1N1 SIV infection and partial protection from heterologous subtypic H3N2 SIV infection. This protection was characterized by significantly reduced macroscopic and microscopic lung lesions, lower virus titers from the respiratory tract, and lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Thus, elastase-dependent SIV mutants can be used as live-virus vaccines against swine influenza in pigs.Swine influenza virus (SIV) is the causative pathogen of swine influenza, a highly contagious, acute respiratory viral disease of swine. The mortality of SIV-infected pigs is usually low, although morbidity may approach 100%. Swine influenza is characterized by sudden onset, coughing, respiratory distress, weight loss, fever, nasal discharge, and rapid recovery (38). SIV is a member of the influenza virus A genus in the Orthomyxoviridae family, and the virus has a genome consisting of eight segments of negative-sense single-stranded RNA (29). Epithelial cells in the swine respiratory tract have receptors for both avian and mammalian influenza viruses (13); thus, pigs could potentially serve as “mixing vessels” for the generation of new reassortant strains of influenza A virus that have pandemic capacity. There are a number of reports in which the direct transmission of influenza viruses from pigs to humans has been documented (6, 12, 52), and several of these cases have resulted in human fatalities (19, 35, 40, 53). Consequently, effective control of SIV would be beneficial to both humans and animals.Until 1998, classical H1N1 SIVs were the predominant isolates from pigs in the United States and Canada (5, 28). In 1997 to 1998, a dramatic change in the epidemiologic pattern of SIV began. Serological studies conducted by Olsen and colleagues in 1997 to 1998 detected a significant increase in H3-seropositive individuals, and H3N2 SIVs were isolated from pigs in both the United States and Canada (17, 54). Furthermore, reassortment between H3N2 viruses and classical H1N1 SIV resulted in the appearance of H1N2 reassortant viruses (14, 15). In addition to the isolation of H4N6 viruses, which are of duck origin, in pigs in Canada (16), wholly avian viruses of the H3N3 and H1N1 subtypes have also been isolated from Canadian pigs (18). In general, three major SIV subtypes exist, i.e., H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2, each of which has multiple genetic and antigenic variants circulating in North American swine populations (18, 28). The increased incidence of avian-like or human-like SIV reassortants raises concerns for public health and requires research devoted to the development of cross-protective SIV vaccines.Currently available swine influenza vaccines are based on inactivated whole virus of the H1N1 and H3N2 subtypes. Application of these vaccines reduces the severity of disease but does not provide consistent protection from infection (3, 22). In contrast to killed vaccines that are administered intramuscularly, intranasally administered live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) induce an immune response at the site of natural infection. Therefore, an LAIV has the potential to induce broad humoral and cellular immune responses that could provide protection against antigenically different influenza viruses. LAIV based on attenuation of the virus by cold adaptation are available for humans (2) and horses (41). However, to date, no SIV LAIV are commercially available for use in swine in North America. Recent studies by Solorzano et al. showed that a mutant SIV with a truncated NS1 protein was highly attenuated in pigs (36). In addition, this SIV/NS1 LAIV was capable of stimulating a protective immune response against homologous SIVs and a partial protection against heterologous subtypic wild-type (WT) SIVs (31, 50). Stech and colleagues demonstrated that the conversion of a conserved cleavage site in the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein from a trypsin-sensitive site to an elastase-sensitive site results in in vivo attenuation of the influenza virus in mouse models (9, 37). Furthermore, these elastase-dependent LAIV were able to induce protective systemic and mucosal immune responses. Recently, we showed that two elastase-dependent SIVs derived from A/Sw/Saskatchewan/18789/02 (SIV/Sk02), R345V and R345A, are attenuated in their natural host, pigs (23). In the current study, we addressed the immunogenic and cross-protective abilities of these mutants.     

A Live Attenuated H7N7 Candidate Vaccine Virus Induces Neutralizing Antibody That Confers Protection from Challenge in Mice,Ferrets, and Monkeys

A live attenuated H7N7 candidate vaccine virus was generated by reverse genetics using the modified hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes of highly pathogenic (HP) A/Netherlands/219/03 (NL/03) (H7N7) wild-type (wt) virus and the six internal protein genes of the cold-adapted (ca) A/Ann Arbor/6/60 ca (AA ca) (H2N2) virus. The reassortant H7N7 NL/03 ca vaccine virus was temperature sensitive and attenuated in mice, ferrets, and African green monkeys (AGMs). Intranasal (i.n.) administration of a single dose of the H7N7 NL/03 ca vaccine virus fully protected mice from lethal challenge with homologous and heterologous H7 viruses from Eurasian and North American lineages. Two doses of the H7N7 NL/03 ca vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies in serum and provided complete protection from pulmonary replication of homologous and heterologous wild-type H7 challenge viruses in mice and ferrets. One dose of the H7N7 NL/03 ca vaccine elicited an antibody response in one of three AGMs that was completely protected from pulmonary replication of the homologous wild-type H7 challenge virus. The contribution of CD8⁺ and/or CD4⁺ T cells to the vaccine-induced protection of mice was evaluated by T-cell depletion; T lymphocytes were not essential for the vaccine-induced protection from lethal challenge with H7 wt viruses. Additionally, passively transferred neutralizing antibody induced by the H7N7 NL/03 ca virus protected mice from lethality following challenge with H7 wt viruses. The safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the H7N7 NL/03 ca vaccine virus in mice, ferrets, and AGMs support the evaluation of this vaccine virus in phase I clinical trials.Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is a disease of poultry that is caused by H5 or H7 avian influenza viruses and is associated with up to 100% mortality (2). Influenza A H7 subtype viruses from both Eurasian and North American lineages have resulted in more than 100 cases of human infection since 2002 in the Netherlands, Italy, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These cases include outbreaks of HPAI H7N7 virus in the Netherlands in 2003 that resulted in more than 80 cases of human infection and one fatality; HPAI H7N3 virus in British Columbia, Canada, in 2004 that resulted in two cases of conjunctivitis; a cluster of human infections of low-pathogenicity avian influenza (LPAI) H7N2 virus in the United Kingdom in 2007 that resulted in several cases of influenza-like illness and conjunctivitis; and a single case of respiratory infection in New York in 2003 (3-6, 17, 27).Due to an unprecedented geographic spread of H5 subtype viruses since 2003 and the continued occurrence of sporadic cases of H5N1 infections in humans, much emphasis has been placed on the pandemic threat posed by H5 subtype viruses. However, H7 subtype viruses also have significant pandemic potential. Humans are immunologically naïve to the H7 avian influenza viruses (16), and LPAI H7 subtype viruses circulating in domestic poultry and wild birds in Eurasia and North America have the potential to evolve and acquire an HP phenotype either by accumulating mutations or by recombination at the hemagglutinin (HA) cleavage site resulting in a highly cleavable HA that is a virulence motif in poultry (30, 33, 34). Recent work also suggests that contemporary North American lineage H7 subtype viruses, isolated in 2002 to 2003, are partially adapted to recognize α2-6-linked sialic acids, which are the receptors preferred by human influenza viruses and are preferentially found in the human upper respiratory tract (7). Moreover, coinfection and genetic reassortment of RNA genomes between H7 avian influenza viruses and human influenza viruses, including the seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 and pandemic H1N1 viruses, could result in the generation of reassortant viruses with the capacity to efficiently transmit among people and result in a pandemic. Domesticated birds may serve as important intermediate hosts for the transmission of wild-bird influenza viruses to humans, as may pigs, as evidenced by human infections with swine-origin 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus throughout the world.Vaccination is the most effective method for the prevention of influenza. However, technical limitations result in delays in the rapid generation and availability of a strain-specific vaccine against an emerging pandemic virus. The emergence of antigenically distinct virus clades poses a substantial challenge for the design of vaccines against H5N1 viruses because of the possible need for clade-specific vaccines (1). Similar challenges are present for the generation of H7 subtype vaccine candidates, because antigenically distinct H7 subtype viruses, including North American lineage H7N2 and H7N3 and Eurasian lineage H7N7 and H7N3 viruses, have caused human disease. The successful control of H7 influenza virus in poultry has been achieved by stamping out and by vaccination of poultry (9). Vaccines for human use against both lineages of H7 influenza virus are under development, and candidate vaccines have been evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies (14, 23, 29, 42).We have previously analyzed the antigenic relatedness among H7 viruses from Eurasian and North American lineages using postinfection mouse and ferret sera (22). Among 10 H7 viruses tested, A/Netherlands/219/03 (H7N7) virus induced the most broadly cross-neutralizing antibodies (Abs) (22). Based on the phylogenetic relationships and its ability to induce broadly cross-neutralizing antibodies in mice and ferrets, we selected the A/Netherlands/219/03 (NL/03) (H7N7) virus from the Eurasian lineage for vaccine development. We used reverse genetics to generate a live attenuated cold-adapted (ca) H7N7 candidate vaccine virus bearing a modified HA, a wild-type (wt) neuraminidase (NA) gene from the NL/03 wt virus, and the six internal protein gene segments from the cold-adapted (ca) influenza A virus vaccine donor strain, A/Ann Arbor/6/60 ca (AA ca) (H2N2). The immunogenicity and protective efficacy against challenge with HP and LP H7 viruses from the Eurasian and North American lineages of the reassortant H7N7 NL03/AA ca vaccine virus were evaluated in mice, ferrets, and African green monkeys (AGMs).     

A Novel Genotype H9N2 Influenza Virus Possessing Human H5N1 Internal Genomes Has Been Circulating in Poultry in Eastern China since 1998

Many novel reassortant influenza viruses of the H9N2 genotype have emerged in aquatic birds in southern China since their initial isolation in this region in 1994. However, the genesis and evolution of H9N2 viruses in poultry in eastern China have not been investigated systematically. In the current study, H9N2 influenza viruses isolated from poultry in eastern China during the past 10 years were characterized genetically and antigenically. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these H9N2 viruses have undergone extensive reassortment to generate multiple novel genotypes, including four genotypes (J, F, K, and L) that have never been recognized before. The major H9N2 influenza viruses represented by A/Chicken/Beijing/1/1994 (Ck/BJ/1/94)-like viruses circulating in poultry in eastern China before 1998 have been gradually replaced by A/Chicken/Shanghai/F/1998 (Ck/SH/F/98)-like viruses, which have a genotype different from that of viruses isolated in southern China. The similarity of the internal genes of these H9N2 viruses to those of the H5N1 influenza viruses isolated from 2001 onwards suggests that the Ck/SH/F/98-like virus may have been the donor of internal genes of human and poultry H5N1 influenza viruses circulating in Eurasia. Experimental studies showed that some of these H9N2 viruses could be efficiently transmitted by the respiratory tract in chicken flocks. Our study provides new insight into the genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses and supports the notion that some of these viruses may have been the donors of internal genes found in H5N1 viruses.Wild birds, including wild waterfowls, gulls, and shorebirds, are the natural reservoirs for influenza A viruses, in which they are thought to be in evolutionary stasis (2, 33). However, when avian influenza viruses are transmitted to new hosts such as terrestrial poultry or mammals, they evolve rapidly and may cause occasional severe systemic infection with high morbidity (20, 29). Despite the fact that avian influenza virus infection occurs commonly in chickens, it is unable to persist for a long period of time due to control efforts and/or a failure of the virus to adapt to new hosts (29). In the past 20 years, greater numbers of outbreaks in poultry have occurred, suggesting that the avian influenza virus can infect and spread in aberrant hosts for an extended period of time (5, 14-16, 18, 32).During the past 10 years, H9N2 influenza viruses have become panzootic in Eurasia and have been isolated from outbreaks in poultry worldwide (3, 5, 11, 14-16, 18, 24). A great deal of previous studies demonstrated that H9N2 influenza viruses have become established in terrestrial poultry in different Asian countries (5, 11, 13, 14, 18, 21, 24, 35). In 1994, H9N2 viruses were isolated from diseased chickens in Guangdong province, China, for the first time (4), and later in domestic poultry in other provinces in China (11, 16, 18, 35). Two distinct H9N2 virus lineages represented by A/Chicken/Beijing/1/94 (H9N2) and A/Quail/Hong Kong/G1/98 (H9N2), respectively, have been circulating in terrestrial poultry of southern China (9). Occasionally these viruses expand their host range to other mammals, including pigs and humans (6, 17, 22, 34). Increasing epidemiological and laboratory findings suggest that chickens may play an important role in expanding the host range for avian influenza virus. Our systematic surveillance of influenza viruses in chickens in China showed that H9N2 subtype influenza viruses continued to be prevalent in chickens in mainland China from 1994 to 2008 (18, 19, 36).Eastern China contains one metropolitan city (Shanghai) and five provinces (Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui, Shandong, and Jiangxi), where domestic poultry account for approximately 50% of the total poultry population in China. Since 1996, H9N2 influenza viruses have been isolated regularly from both chickens and other minor poultry species in our surveillance program in the eastern China region, but their genetic diversity and the interrelationships between H9N2 influenza viruses and different types of poultry have not been determined. Therefore, it is imperative to explore the evolution and properties of these viruses. The current report provides insight into the genesis and evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses in eastern China and presents new evidence for the potential crossover between H9N2 and H5N1 influenza viruses in this region.     

Intradermal Vaccination with Influenza Virus-Like Particles by Using Microneedles Induces Protection Superior to That with Intramuscular Immunization

Influenza virus-like particles (VLPs) are a promising cell culture-based vaccine, and the skin is considered an attractive immunization site. In this study, we examined the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of influenza VLPs (H1N1 A/PR/8/34) after skin vaccination using vaccine dried on solid microneedle arrays. Coating of microneedles with influenza VLPs using an unstabilized formulation was found to decrease hemagglutinin (HA) activity, whereas inclusion of trehalose disaccharide preserved the HA activity of influenza VLP vaccines after microneedles were coated. Microneedle vaccination of mice in the skin with a single dose of stabilized influenza VLPs induced 100% protection against challenge infection with a high lethal dose. In contrast, unstabilized influenza VLPs, as well as intramuscularly injected vaccines, provided inferior immunity and only partial protection (≤40%). The stabilized microneedle vaccination group showed IgG2a levels that were 1 order of magnitude higher than those of other groups and had the lowest lung viral titers after challenge. Also, levels of recall immune responses, including hemagglutination inhibition titers, neutralizing antibodies, and antibody-secreting plasma cells, were significantly higher after skin vaccination with stabilized formulations. Therefore, our results indicate that HA stabilization, combined with vaccination via the skin using a vaccine formulated as a solid microneedle patch, confers protection superior to that with intramuscular injection and enables potential dose-sparing effects which are reflected by pronounced increases in rapid recall immune responses against influenza virus.Influenza is a major health threat among infectious diseases, posing a significant burden for public health worldwide. Over 200,000 hospitalizations and approximately 36,000 deaths are estimated to occur annually in the United States alone (48, 49). Vaccination is the most cost-effective measure for controlling influenza. However, the influenza vaccine needs to be updated and manufactured every year due to changes in circulating viral strains. Current influenza vaccines rely on egg substrate-based production, a lengthy process with limited capacity that can cause shortages in available vaccine supplies. The recent 2009 outbreak of H1N1 influenza virus is a good example of the urgent need to develop a more effective vaccine platform and vaccination method (38).Influenza virus-like particles (VLPs) have been suggested as a promising alternative candidate to current influenza vaccines. Influenza VLPs are noninfectious particles that mimic the virus in structure and morphology, can be produced using an egg-free cell culture system, and have been shown to be highly immunogenic, inducing protective immunity (9, 15, 19, 27, 35, 41, 42, 44). Most current vaccines are administered intramuscularly to humans in liquid formulations using hypodermic needles or syringes. Another strategy to meet the potential need for mass vaccination would be to develop an effective method for vaccine delivery to the skin (4, 8, 32, 50, 52). The skin is considered an important peripheral immune organ rich in potent immune-inducing cells, including Langerhans cells (LCs), dermal dendritic cells (DCs), and keratinocytes (5, 13, 14, 22). LCs and DCs residing in the epidermal and dermal layers of the skin have been shown to play an important role in antigen processing and presentation following skin immunization (1, 13, 14, 22). Intradermal (ID) vaccination delivering antigens to the dermal layer of the skin has been performed in many clinical studies and have demonstrated dose-sparing effects in some cases (4, 28, 29). Particularly, ID delivery of vaccines might be more effective in the elderly population (50), the highest risk group for influenza epidemics (49). However, ID delivery of vaccines using hypodermic needles is painful and needs highly trained medical personnel. In addition, more frequent local reactions at the injection site were observed after ID delivery. Therefore, a simple and effective approach for vaccination without using hypodermic needles would be highly desirable.To overcome the skin barrier of the outer layer of stratum corneum, solid microneedles were previously coated with inactivated influenza viruses and used to successfully deliver vaccines to the skin, which provided protection comparable to that with conventional intramuscular immunizations (32, 52). Other vaccines have also been delivered using microneedles (17, 17a), but VLPs have never been used this way before. Delivery of a powdered form of inactivated influenza vaccines to the skin has also been demonstrated using a high-speed jet delivery device (10). These previous studies used high doses of vaccines, possibly due to the instability of vaccines in dry formulations.Influenza hemagglutinin (HA) is responsible for attachment of the virus to sialic acid-containing receptors on target cells. However, it is not well understood how functional activity of HA affects the immunogenicity of influenza VLP vaccines. For the first time in this study, we investigated the effect of HA stability, immune responses, and protective efficacies of solid-microneedle VLP vaccines containing H1 HA as a major influenza viral component after delivery to the skin in comparison to results with intramuscular immunization. We found that the functional integrity of HA in influenza VLPs significantly influenced the immunological and protective outcomes for both microneedle and intramuscular vaccination. In addition, we have observed differential outcomes contributing to the protective immunity by the delivery of HA-stabilized VLPs to the skin in terms of the types of immune responses, recall antibody responses, and viral clearance at an early time point after challenge compared to those induced by intramuscular immunization.     

Glycosylation at 158N of the Hemagglutinin Protein and Receptor Binding Specificity Synergistically Affect the Antigenicity and Immunogenicity of a Live Attenuated H5N1 A/Vietnam/1203/2004 Vaccine Virus in Ferrets

A live attenuated influenza A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (H5N1) vaccine virus (VN04 ca) has receptor binding specificity to α2,3-linked sialosides (α2,3SAL), and a single dose induces a minimal serum antibody response in mice and ferrets. In contrast, A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) vaccine virus (HK03 ca) binds to both α2,6SAL and α2,3SAL and generates a stronger serum antibody response in animals. Among the 9 amino acids that differed between the two H5 HA1 proteins, several HK03-specific residues enabled the VN04 ca virus to bind to both α2,3SAL and α2,6SAL receptors, but only the removal of the 158N glycosylation, together with an S227N change, resulted in more-efficient viral replication in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets and an increased serum antibody response. However, the antibody response was HK03 strain specific and did not significantly cross-neutralize VN04 virus. A second approach was taken to adapt the H5N1 VN04 ca virus in MDCK cells to select HA variants with larger plaque morphology. Although a number of large-plaque-size HA variants with amino acid changes in the HA receptor binding region were identified, none of these mutations affected virus receptor binding preference and immunogenicity. In addition, the known receptor binding site changes, Q226L and G228S, were introduced into the HA protein of the VN04 ca virus. Only in conjunction with the removal of the 158N glycosylation did the virus replicate efficiently in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets and became more immunogenic, yet the response was also HK03 specific. Thus, the mask of the antigenic epitopes by 158N glycosylation at the HA globular head and its α2,3SAL binding preference of VN04 ca virus affect virus antigenicity and replication in the host, resulting in a lower antibody response.Influenza A viruses have the potential to cause pandemics of various severities. The emergence of new influenza virus strains to which the general population has low or no immunity, such as the 2009 swine-origin influenza A H1N1 viruses, will continue to challenge public health authorities and the scientific community to develop quick and efficient mitigation responses (18). Highly pathogenic avian influenza A (HPAI) H5N1 viruses pose a serious pandemic threat due to their virulence and high mortality in humans, and their increasingly expanding host reservoir and significant ongoing evolution could enhance their human-to-human transmissibility (8). Currently, the case fatality rate of HPAI H5N1 viruses in humans is estimated to be approximately 60% (30).Although HPAI H5N1 viruses are now endemic in several countries (2), direct transmission of influenza viruses from avian species to humans remains a relatively rare event. The hemagglutinin (HA) protein''s affinity for cell surface sialic acid-containing molecules is one of the determinants of influenza A virus host range restriction. Human and avian influenza virus isolates differ in their recognition of host cell receptors; human strains mainly bind α2,3-linked sialosides (α2,6SAL), whereas the avian strains have a high affinity to α2,3SAL (15, 32). The influenza pandemics of the last century have been suggested to result from switching of HA receptor-binding specificity from α2,3SAL to α2,6SAL receptors (6, 26, 31).The receptor-binding specificity of the HA protein can be influenced by several critical residues. For influenza H3 subtype viruses, substitutions of Q226L and G228S could completely reverse receptor-binding specificity from α2,3SAL to α2,6SAL (4, 21). For the H1 subtype viruses, the E190D and D225G residues switch virus receptor binding specificity from α2,3SAL to α2,6SAL for the 1918 pandemic H1N1 viruses (6, 25). However, based on glycan microarray analysis, the 190E and 225D residues cannot alter the HA binding preference from α2,3SAL to α2,6SAL for H5N1 viruses (26).Vaccination is considered a preferred approach to prevent influenza-related illness in the community. A pandemic influenza vaccine should stimulate protective immunity in the target population using the smallest amount of antigen possible, thus enabling availability of maximal vaccine doses. The inactivated H5N1 VN04 vaccines have been found to be poorly immunogenic in humans, and adjuvants are needed to enhance vaccine immunogenicity (13). Live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) have several desirable attributes: the stimulation of a durable mucosal and systemic immunity, broad efficacy against homologous and drifted strains, and efficient production (17).Several H5N1 LAIV vaccines possessing a modified HA and neuraminidase (NA) of an H5N1 virus and the six internal protein gene segments (PB1, PB2, PA, NP, M, and NS) of the A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2) cold-adapted (AA ca) master donor virus were previously generated and evaluated for their immunogenicity and efficacy in mice and ferrets (29). A single dose of A/Vietnam/1203/2004 (VN04 ca) LAIV elicited very low levels of serum neutralizing antibodies against homologous and heterologous wild-type (wt) H5N1 viruses 4 weeks after administration to mice and ferrets. In contrast, a single dose of A/Hong Kong/213/2003 (H5N1) (HK03 ca) LAIV was more immunogenic (29). A specific amino acid residue at position 227 in the HK03 HA has been reported to be responsible for the greater immunogenicity of HK03 (9). VN04 and HK03 also differ in their receptor binding specificities. The VN04 HA mainly recognizes α2,3SAL, while the HK03 HA recognizes both α2,3SAL and α2,6SAL (7, 14, 22, 36). Sequence alignment of the two H5 HA proteins revealed nine amino acid differences in their HA1 region (9). The current analysis evaluates the impact of these amino acid differences on H5N1 VN ca vaccine strain replication and immunogenicity. In addition, adaptive mutations selected from MDCK passage of the H5N1 VN04 ca virus and introduction of known receptor binding sites were evaluated for their effect on antigenicity and immunogenicity of the H5N1 VN04 ca virus.     

Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Established by Seasonal Human Influenza Cross-React against 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus

While few children and young adults have cross-protective antibodies to the pandemic H1N1 2009 (pdmH1N1) virus, the illness remains mild. The biological reasons for these epidemiological observations are unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that the bulk memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) established by seasonal influenza viruses from healthy individuals who have not been exposed to pdmH1N1 can directly lyse pdmH1N1-infected target cells and produce gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α). Using influenza A virus matrix protein 1 (M1_58-66) epitope-specific CTLs isolated from healthy HLA-A2⁺ individuals, we further found that M1_58-66 epitope-specific CTLs efficiently killed both M1_58-66 peptide-pulsed and pdmH1N1-infected target cells ex vivo. These M1_58-66-specific CTLs showed an effector memory phenotype and expressed CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokine receptors. Of 94 influenza A virus CD8 T-cell epitopes obtained from the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB), 17 epitopes are conserved in pdmH1N1, and more than half of these conserved epitopes are derived from M1 protein. In addition, 65% (11/17) of these epitopes were 100% conserved in seasonal influenza vaccine H1N1 strains during the last 20 years. Importantly, seasonal influenza vaccination could expand the functional M1_58-66 epitope-specific CTLs in 20% (4/20) of HLA-A2⁺ individuals. Our results indicated that memory CTLs established by seasonal influenza A viruses or vaccines had cross-reactivity against pdmH1N1. These might explain, at least in part, the unexpected mild pdmH1N1 illness in the community and also might provide some valuable insights for the future design of broadly protective vaccines to prevent influenza, especially pandemic influenza.Since its first identification in North America in April 2009, the novel pandemic H1N1 2009 (pdmH1N1) virus has been spreading in humans worldwide, giving rise to the first pandemic in the 21st century (13, 18). The pdmH1N1 virus contains a unique gene constellation, with its NA and M gene segments being derived from the Eurasian swine lineage while the other gene segments originated from the swine triple-reassortant H1N1 lineage. The triple-reassortant swine viruses have in turn derived the HA, NP, and NS gene segments from the classical swine lineage (20). The 1918 pandemic virus gave rise to both the seasonal influenza H1N1 and the classical swine H1N1 virus lineages (41). Evolution in different hosts during the subsequent 90 years has led to increasing antigenic differences between recent seasonal H1N1 viruses and swine H1 viruses (42). Thus, younger individuals have no antibodies that cross neutralize pdmH1N1, while those over 65 years of age are increasingly likely to have cross-neutralizing antibodies to pdmH1N1 (10, 25).Currently available seasonal influenza vaccines do not induce cross-reactive antibodies against this novel virus in any age group (10, 25). In animal models, it has been shown that pdmH1N1 replicated more efficiently and caused more severe pathological lesions than the current seasonal influenza virus (28). However, most patients with pdmH1N1 virus infection show a mild illness comparable to seasonal influenza (9, 42). The incidence of severe cases caused by pdmH1N1 was not significantly higher than that caused by human seasonal influenza viruses (43). These findings imply that seasonal influenza A virus-specific memory T cells preexisting in previously infected individuals may have cross-protection to this novel pdmH1N1.Cross-reactivity of influenza A virus-specific T-cell immunity against heterosubtypic strains which are serologically distinct has been demonstrated (5, 29, 33, 47). Humans who have not been exposed to avian influenza A (H5N1) virus do have cross-reactive memory CD4 and CD8 T cells to a wide range of H5N1 peptides (33, 47). More recently, one study also showed that some seasonal influenza A virus-specific memory T cells in individuals without exposure to prior pdmH1N1 infection can recognize pdmH1N1 (24). However, the results in most of these studies were determined by the gamma interferon (IFN-γ) responses to influenza virus peptides. Although the recalled IFN-γ response is commonly used to detect memory CD4 and CD8 T cells, the activated T cells that bind major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-presented peptide are not necessarily capable of lysing the target cells (6). In addition, the peptides, but not the whole virus, may not be able to fully represent the human cross-response against the virus as a whole. Therefore, in addition to cytokine production, the demonstration of direct antigen-specific cytotoxicity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) against both peptide-pulsed and virus-infected target cells is needed for better understanding of human CTL responses against pdmH1N1 virus.In this study, using bulk memory CTLs and epitope-specific CTLs established by seasonal influenza A viruses and epitope-specific peptide from healthy individuals, respectively, we evaluated their cross-cytotoxicity and cytokine responses to pdmH1N1. We also examined the expression of chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR5, which could help CTLs to migrate to the site of infection. In addition, to understand whether the seasonal influenza vaccines have benefit for people who have not been exposed to pdmH1N1, we further examined the ability of seasonal influenza vaccines to induce the conserved M1_58-66 epitope-specific CTLs in HLA-A2-seropositive healthy individuals.     

Transmission of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza Virus and Impact of Prior Exposure to Seasonal Strains or Interferon Treatment

Novel swine-origin influenza viruses of the H1N1 subtype were first detected in humans in April 2009. As of 12 August 2009, 180,000 cases had been reported globally. Despite the fact that they are of the same antigenic subtype as seasonal influenza viruses circulating in humans since 1977, these viruses continue to spread and have caused the first influenza pandemic since 1968. Here we show that a pandemic H1N1 strain replicates in and transmits among guinea pigs with similar efficiency to that of a seasonal H3N2 influenza virus. This transmission was, however, partially disrupted when guinea pigs had preexisting immunity to recent human isolates of either the H1N1 or H3N2 subtype and was fully blocked through daily intranasal administration of interferon to either inoculated or exposed animals. Our results suggest that partial immunity resulting from prior exposure to conventional human strains may blunt the impact of pandemic H1N1 viruses in the human population. In addition, the use of interferon as an antiviral prophylaxis may be an effective way to limit spread in at-risk populations.A pandemic of novel swine-origin influenza virus (H1N1) is developing rapidly. As of 12 August 2009, nearly 180,000 cases had been reported to the WHO from around the globe (36). Sustained human-to-human transmission has furthermore been observed in multiple countries, prompting the WHO to declare a public health emergency of international concern and to raise the pandemic alert level to phase 6 (7).Swine are a natural host of influenza viruses, and although sporadic incidences of human infection with swine influenza viruses occur (8, 9, 14, 29, 35), human-to-human transmission is rare. H1N1 influenza viruses have likely circulated in swine since shortly after the 1918 human influenza pandemic (38). From the 1930s, when a swine influenza virus was first isolated, to the late 1990s, this classical swine lineage has remained relatively stable antigenically (34). In the late 1990s, however, genetic reassortment between a human H3N2 virus, a North American avian virus, and a classical swine influenza virus produced a triple reassortant virus, which subsequently spread among North American swine (34). Further reassortment events involving human influenza viruses led to the emergence in pigs of triple reassortants of the H1N1 and H1N2 subtypes (34). None of these swine viruses have demonstrated the potential for sustained human-to-human transmission.The swine-origin influenza viruses now emerging in the human population possess a previously uncharacterized constellation of eight genes (28). The NA and M segments derive from a Eurasian swine influenza virus lineage, having entered pigs from the avian reservoir around 1979, while the HA, NP, and NS segments are of the classical swine lineage and the PA, PB1, and PB2 segments derive from the North American triple reassortant swine lineage (13). This unique combination of genetic elements (segments from multiple swine influenza virus lineages, some of them derived from avian and human influenza viruses) may account for the improved fitness of pandemic H1N1 viruses, relative to that of previous swine isolates, in humans.Several uncertainties remain about how this outbreak will develop over time. Although the novel H1N1 virus has spread over a broad geographical area, the number of people known to be infected remains low in many countries, which could be due, at least in part, to the lack of optimal transmission of influenza viruses outside the winter season; thus, it is unclear at this point whether the new virus will become established in the long term. Two major factors will shape the epidemiology of pandemic H1N1 viruses in the coming months and years: the intrinsic transmissibility of the virus and the degree of protection offered by previous exposure to seasonal human strains. Initial estimates of the reproductive number (R₀) have been made based on the epidemiology of the virus to date and suggest that its rate of spread is intermediate between that of seasonal flu and that of previous pandemic strains (3, 11). However, more precise estimates of R₀ will depend on better surveillance data in the future. The transmission phenotype of pandemic H1N1 viruses in a ferret model was also recently reported and was found to be similar to (16, 27) or less efficient (25) than that of seasonal H1N1 strains. The reason for this discrepancy in the ferret model is unclear.Importantly, in considering the human population, the impact of immunity against seasonal strains on the transmission potential of pandemic H1N1 viruses is not clear. According to conventional wisdom, an influenza virus must be of a hemagglutinin (HA) subtype which is novel to the human population in order to cause a pandemic (18, 38). Analysis of human sera collected from individuals with diverse influenza virus exposure histories has indicated that in those born in the early part of the 20th century, neutralizing activity against A/California/04/09 (Cal/04/09) virus is often present (16). Conversely, serological analyses of ferret postinfection sera (13) and human pre- and postvaccination sera (4a) revealed that neutralizing antibodies against recently circulating human H1N1 viruses do not react with pandemic H1N1 isolates. These serological findings may explain the relatively small number of cases seen to date in individuals greater than 65 years of age (6). Even in the absence of neutralizing antibodies, however, a measure of immune protection sufficient to dampen transmission may be present in a host who has recently experienced seasonal influenza (10). If, on the other hand, transmission is high and immunity is low, then pandemic H1N1 strains will likely continue to spread rapidly through the population. In this situation, a range of pharmaceutical interventions will be needed to dampen the public health impact of the pandemic.Herein we used the guinea pig model (4, 21-24, 26, 30) to assess the transmissibility of the pandemic H1N1 strains Cal/04/09 and A/Netherlands/602/09 (NL/602/09) relative to that of previous human and swine influenza viruses. To better mimic the human situation, we then tested whether the efficiency of transmission is decreased by preexisting immunity to recent human H1N1 or H3N2 influenza viruses. Finally, we assessed the efficacy of intranasal treatment with type I interferon (IFN) in limiting the replication and transmission of pandemic H1N1 viruses.     

Evaluation of Vaccines for H5N1 Influenza Virus in Ferrets Reveals the Potential for Protective Single-Shot Immunization

As part of influenza pandemic preparedness, policy decisions need to be made about how best to utilize vaccines once they are manufactured. Since H5N1 avian influenza virus has the potential to initiate the next human pandemic, isolates of this subtype have been used for the production and testing of prepandemic vaccines. Clinical trials of such vaccines indicate that two injections of preparations containing adjuvant will be required to induce protective immunity. However, this is a working assumption based on classical serological measures only. Examined here are the dose of viral hemagglutinin (HA) and the number of inoculations required for two different H5N1 vaccines to achieve protection in ferrets after lethal H5N1 challenge. Ferrets inoculated twice with 30 μg of A/Vietnam/1194/2004 HA vaccine with AlPO₄, or with doses as low as 3.8 μg of HA with Iscomatrix (ISCOMATRIX, referred to as Iscomatrix herein, is a registered trademark of CSL Limited) adjuvant, were completely protected against death and disease after H5N1 challenge, and the protection lasted at least 15 months. Cross-clade protection was also observed with both vaccines. Significantly, complete protection against death could be achieved with only a single inoculation of H5N1 vaccine containing as little as 15 μg of HA with AlPO₄ or 3.8 μg of HA with Iscomatrix adjuvant. Ferrets vaccinated with the single-injection Iscomatrix vaccines showed fewer clinical manifestations of infection than those given AlPO₄ vaccines and remained highly active. Our data provide the first indication that in the event of a future influenza pandemic, effective mass vaccination may be achievable with a low-dose “single-shot” vaccine and provide not only increased survival but also significant reduction in disease severity.The emergence in 2004 and continued persistence of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus in bird populations is justifiably considered a potential pandemic threat (19). The virus has become endemic in many areas of the world and has demonstrated an ability to infect humans through transmission from poultry, thus far with limited human-to-human spread (26). Of great concern is that the case fatality rate for H5N1 infection of humans is reported to be >60%, compared to 0.1% for the 1957 and 1968 pandemics and 2 to 3% for the 1918 pandemic, which together resulted in at least 50 million deaths (14, 20). For these reasons, the development of strategies to minimize the impact if the virus mutates to acquire efficient human-to-human spread is essential.Vaccination is considered the best method to ultimately control an influenza pandemic and should be implemented as soon as the pandemic strain is identified and vaccines produced (9, 23). To maximize coverage, pandemic vaccines will need to be available rapidly and will have to include the minimal dose of antigen to achieve solid immunity. This poses several major problems. One is that the human population is predominantly immunologically naive to the emerging subtype of virus, and so very large numbers of people will need to be protected as quickly as possible, which will place a huge demand on vaccine supply. The use of an adjuvant to lower the dose of antigen required (8) may ameliorate this problem to some degree, but there are few adjuvants that are suitable for human use, particularly those in ready supply in the event of a pandemic. In addition, we have little understanding of what levels and what type of immunity will provide protection from death or severe disease due to H5N1 infection (19).Clinical trials with candidate H5N1 vaccines have been initiated with traditional virus preparations (egg-grown whole or detergent-disrupted “split” virions) and alternative vaccine strategies (recombinant protein, live-attenuated, and adjuvant-containing vaccines) (24). Using split virus alone, high amounts of antigen, containing 90 μg of hemagglutinin (HA), given twice, were required to elicit what is considered to be a protective antibody response in ca. 50% of subjects (25). Adjuvants, such as those based on aluminum salts (3) or the oil-in-water adjuvants MF59 (2, 17, 22) and ASO3 (13, 21), have provided considerable antigen dose reduction, but in all clinical trials and preclinical animal evaluation to date, two doses of vaccine have been required to achieve what is considered to be adequate anti-HA antibody levels or protection, respectively (8, 24).One aim of the present study was to determine how suitable the ferret model is for making assumptions about human responsiveness to influenza vaccination. To do this, we evaluated in ferrets the same H5N1 pandemic vaccines, formulated with or without AlPO₄ adjuvant, that had been examined in phase 1 and II randomized trials in healthy adults (18). We then sought to compare whether the responses to these vaccines were protective against lethal H5N1 challenge and whether the protective effects could be achieved with less antigen by using the more potent saponin-based Iscomatrix (ISCOMATRIX, referred to as Iscomatrix herein, is a registered trademark of CSL Limited) adjuvant. The Iscomatrix adjuvant has been shown to be safe and well tolerated in humans and to induce strong and long-lived antibody and cytotoxic T-cell responses in both humans and animal studies (7). Finally, the encouraging results with these adjuvants led us to examine whether protection from severe disease and death could be achieved after only a single injection of the H5N1 vaccines.     

A Chimeric Alphavirus Replicon Particle Vaccine Expressing the Hemagglutinin and Fusion Proteins Protects Juvenile and Infant Rhesus Macaques from Measles

Measles remains a major cause of child mortality, in part due to an inability to vaccinate young infants with the current live attenuated virus vaccine (LAV). To explore new approaches to infant vaccination, chimeric Venezuelan equine encephalitis/Sindbis virus (VEE/SIN) replicon particles were used to express the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins of measles virus (MV). Juvenile rhesus macaques vaccinated intradermally with a single dose of VEE/SIN expressing H or H and F proteins (VEE/SIN-H or VEE/SIN-H+F, respectively) developed high titers of MV-specific neutralizing antibody and gamma-interferon (IFN-γ)-producing T cells. Infant macaques vaccinated with two doses of VEE/SIN-H+F also developed neutralizing antibody and IFN-γ-producing T cells. Control animals were vaccinated with LAV or with a formalin-inactivated measles vaccine (FIMV). Neutralizing antibody remained above the protective level for more than 1 year after vaccination with VEE/SIN-H, VEE/SIN-H+F, or LAV. When challenged with wild-type MV 12 to 17 months after vaccination, all vaccinated juvenile and infant monkeys vaccinated with VEE/SIN-H, VEE/SIN-H+F, and LAV were protected from rash and viremia, while FIMV-vaccinated monkeys were not. Antibody was boosted by challenge in all groups. T-cell responses to challenge were biphasic, with peaks at 7 to 25 days and at 90 to 110 days in all groups, except for the LAV group. Recrudescent T-cell activity coincided with the presence of MV RNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We conclude that VEE/SIN expressing H or H and F induces durable immune responses that protect from measles and offers a promising new approach for measles vaccination. The viral and immunological factors associated with long-term control of MV replication require further investigation.Measles remains a major cause of child mortality despite the availability of a safe and effective live attenuated virus vaccine (LAV). Recent efforts to improve routine vaccination and implement national immunization days have moved measles control toward the World Health Organization''s goal of a 90% reduction in mortality by 2010 compared to 2000 (7). One persistent impediment to measles control in many countries remains the inability to successfully immunize young infants due to the immaturity of the immune system and interference of maternal antibodies with immune responses to LAV (1, 15, 65).Because the decrease in maternal antibody varies from one infant to another, many children in areas with high measles virus (MV) transmission rates are at risk of acquiring measles prior to vaccination (3, 5, 12). Immaturity also affects the quality and quantity of antibody produced in response to the current vaccine, with lower levels of neutralizing antibody and deficient avidity and isotype maturation in younger than in older infants (15, 16, 37, 59). As a result, the recommended age for vaccination is generally 9 months in developing countries to balance the risk of infection with the likelihood of response to the vaccine (24).A vaccine that could be given to children under the age of 6 months would improve measles control by allowing delivery with other infant vaccines and by closing the window of susceptibility prior to delivery of the current vaccine. Increasing the dose of LAV improved the antibody responses in young infants but resulted in an unexpected increase in mortality for girls, so this is not an acceptable approach to lowering the age of vaccination (18, 26, 29). Experience with a formalin-inactivated measles vaccine (FIMV) in the 1960s also led to unexpected complications. FIMV provided only short-term protection, and vaccinated individuals were at risk for more severe disease (atypical measles) upon infection with wild-type MV (14, 36, 54). Therefore, other strategies are necessary for development of a vaccine for young infants.One particularly promising approach for delivery of vaccine antigens is the use of alphavirus replicon particles (55). Alphaviruses are small positive-strand RNA viruses with the nonstructural replicase proteins encoded in the 5′ two-thirds of the genome and the structural proteins in the 3′ one-third. A subgenomic promoter is used to synthesize an abundant, smaller RNA from which the structural proteins are translated (61). Replicons contain the nonstructural protein genes, the 5′ and 3′ end cis-active replication sequences, and the subgenomic promoter that directs expression of a heterologous gene rather than the viral structural proteins. The replicon RNA can be packaged into virus-like particles by providing the structural proteins in trans using transient transfection (6, 33) or with stable packaging cell lines (51) and can be engineered for efficient delivery to antigen-presenting cells (17). Advantages include high-level expression of the vaccine antigen (68), stimulation of innate immunity (25, 31, 32, 64), and general lack of preexisting immunity in the human population.MV encodes six structural proteins of which two, hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F), are surface glycoproteins involved in attachment and entry. Antibodies that inhibit MV infection in neutralization assays are directed primarily against the H protein, which also contains important CD8⁺ T-cell epitopes (39, 41). Nonhuman primates, particularly rhesus macaques, develop a disease similar to that of humans and offer the opportunity for assessing both protection from wild-type MV challenge and priming for enhanced disease after immunization with new experimental vaccines (2, 48, 50, 66). Because protection from measles correlates best with the quality and quantity of neutralizing antibodies at the time of exposure (9, 50), most experimental vaccines have used H alone or H and F for induction of MV protective immunity (44, 50, 65, 70).Alphaviruses that have been used for construction of replicon particle vaccines include Sindbis virus (SINV) (6, 68), Semliki Forest virus (33), and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) (53). Each of the alphavirus vectors studied has its own advantages and disadvantages. For instance, VEEV replicon particles have high levels of gene expression (47), but vaccine production is disadvantaged by the requirement for biosafety level 3 manufacturing. SINV replicon particles avoid the safety concerns of VEEV, but expression levels are lower. Previous studies of a SINV-based replicon particle vaccine expressing MV H (SIN-H) in macaques showed good induction of neutralizing antibody and T-cell responses and protection from rash (44). However, vaccinated monkeys developed viremias after challenge, indicating that they were not protected from infection. In this study, we sought to improve the alphavirus replicon particle approach to vaccination for measles by using a chimeric VEE/SIN vaccine (47) expressing both the MV H and F proteins.     

Generation of Live Attenuated Novel Influenza Virus A/California/7/09 (H1N1) Vaccines with High Yield in Embryonated Chicken Eggs

Several live attenuated influenza virus A/California/7/09 (H1N1) (CA09) candidate vaccine variants that possess the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) gene segments from the CA09 virus and six internal protein gene segments from the cold-adapted influenza virus A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2) virus were generated by reverse genetics. The reassortant viruses replicated relatively poorly in embryonated chicken eggs. To improve virus growth in eggs, reassortants expressing the HA and NA of CA09 were passaged in MDCK cells and variants exhibiting large-plaque morphology were isolated. These variants replicated at levels approximately 10-fold higher than the rate of replication of the parental strains in embryonated chicken eggs. Sequence analysis indicated that single amino acid changes at positions 119, 153, 154, and 186 were responsible for the improved growth properties in MDCK cells and eggs. In addition, the introduction of a mutation at residue 155 that was previously shown to enhance the replication of a 1976 swine influenza virus also significantly improved the replication of the CA09 virus in eggs. Each variant was further evaluated for receptor binding preference, antigenicity, attenuation phenotype, and immunogenicity. Mutations at residues 153, 154, and 155 drastically reduced viral antigenicity, which made these mutants unsuitable as vaccine candidates. However, changes at residues 119 and 186 did not affect virus antigenicity or immunogenicity, justifying their inclusion in live attenuated vaccine candidates to protect against the currently circulating 2009 swine origin H1N1 viruses.Human infections with the swine origin influenza virus A (H1N1) were first detected in April 2009 and spread across the globe, resulting in WHO declaring a pandemic on 12 June 2009 for the first time in the past 41 years. More than 296,471 people have had confirmed infections with this novel H1N1 virus, and there have been at least 3,486 deaths as of September 18, 2009. In the last century, an influenza H1N1 virus caused the devastating 1918-1919 pandemic; this pandemic was characterized by a mild outbreak in the spring of 1918, followed by a lethal wave globally in the fall of that year which killed as many as 50 million people worldwide (20, 29). The 2009 H1N1 viruses circulating globally since April 2009 have not caused a significant rise in mortality related to influenza. Nucleotide sequence analysis suggested that E627 in PB2, a deletion of the PDZ ligand domain in NS1, and the lack of the PB1-F2 open reading frame in the 2009 H1N1 viruses may contribute to the relatively mild virulence (20, 26, 27). Recent animal studies have shown that the 2009 H1N1 influenza viruses did not replicate in tissues beyond the respiratory tract and did not cause significant mortality in the ferret model; however, the 2009 H1N1 viruses are capable of infecting deep in the lung tissues and caused more significant lesions in the lung tissues of animals, including nonhuman primates, than typical seasonal strains (13, 17, 19). Children and young adults are particularly susceptible to the 2009 H1N1 virus infection because they have no or low immunity to the novel 2009 H1N1 strains (11, 13). The widespread and rapid distribution of the 2009 H1N1 viruses in humans raises a concern about the evolution of more virulent strains during passage in the population. One fear is that mutant forms of the 2009 H1N1 viruses may exhibit significantly increased virulence (2, 19). Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an effective vaccine to control the influenza pandemic caused by the swine origin H1N1 viruses.Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has been licensed in the United States annually since 2003. The seasonal vaccine protects against influenza illness and elicits both systemic and mucosal immune responses, including serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibodies that react to antigenically drifted strains (3, 4). A critical attribute of an effective pandemic vaccine is its capability to elicit an immune response in immunonaive individuals; LAIV has been shown to offer protection following a single dose in young children. However, two doses of vaccines are recommended for children younger than 9 years of age who have never been immunized with influenza vaccines. In order to produce LAIV to protect against the newly emerged swine origin H1N1 influenza virus, we have produced several 6:2 reassortant candidate vaccine strains that express the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) gene segments from influenza virus A/California/4/09 (A/CA/4/09) (H1N1) or A/CA/7/09 (H1N1), as well as the six internal protein gene segments (PB1, PB2, PA, NP, M, and NS) from cold-adapted A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2) (AA60) virus, which is the master donor virus for all influenza virus A strains in trivalent seasonal LAIV. Initial evaluation of these candidate vaccine strains indicated that they did not replicate as efficiently as seasonal H1N1 influenza vaccine strains in embryonated chicken eggs. In this report, we describe directed modifications of the HA gene segment that improved vaccine yields in eggs, resulting in a number of vaccine candidates that are available for human use.     

Characterization of the H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Derived from Wild Pikas in China

The highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus emerged from China in 1996 and has spread across Eurasia and Africa, with a continuous stream of new cases of human infection appearing since the first large-scale outbreak among migratory birds at Qinghai Lake. The role of wild birds, which are the natural reservoirs for the virus, in the epidemiology of the H5N1 virus has raised great public health concern, but their role in the spread of the virus within the natural ecosystem of free-ranging terrestrial wild mammals remains unclear. In this study, we investigated H5N1 virus infection in wild pikas in an attempt to trace the circulation of the virus. Seroepidemiological surveys confirmed a natural H5N1 virus infection of wild pikas in their native environment. The hemagglutination gene of the H5N1 virus isolated from pikas reveals two distinct evolutionary clades, a mixed/Vietnam H5N1 virus sublineage (MV-like pika virus) and a wild bird Qinghai (QH)-like H5N1 virus sublineage (QH-like pika virus). The amino acid residue (glutamic acid) at position 627 encoded by the PB2 gene of the MV-like pika virus was different from that of the QH-like pika virus; the residue of the MV-like pika virus was the same as that of the goose H5N1 virus (A/GS/Guangdong [GD]/1/96). Further, we discovered that in contrast to the MV-like pika virus, which is nonpathogenic to mice, the QH-like pika virus is highly pathogenic. To mimic the virus infection of pikas, we intranasally inoculated rabbits, a species closely related to pikas, with the H5N1 virus of pika origin. Our findings first demonstrate that wild pikas are mammalian hosts exposed to H5N1 subtype avian influenza viruses in the natural ecosystem and also imply a potential transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus from wild mammals into domestic mammalian hosts and humans.Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an extremely infectious, systemic viral disease that causes a high rate of mortality in birds. HPAI H5N1 viruses are now endemic in avian populations in Southeast Asia and have repeatedly been transmitted to humans (9, 14, 27). Since 2003, the H5N1 subtype has been reported in 391 human cases of influenza and has caused 247 human deaths in 15 countries, leading to greater than 60% mortality among infected individuals (38). Although currently incapable of sustained human-to-human transmission, H5N1 viruses undoubtedly pose a serious threat to public health, as well as to the global economy. Hence, preparedness for such a threat is a global priority (36).Wild birds are considered to be natural reservoirs for influenza A viruses (6, 18, 21, 35, 37). Of the 144 type A influenza virus hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HA-NA) combinations, 103 have been found in wild birds (5, 7, 17, 37). Since the first HPAI outbreak among migratory wild birds appeared at Qinghai Lake in western China in May 2005 (3, 16, 25, 34, 41), HPAI viruses of the H5N1 subtype have been isolated from poultry throughout Eurasia and Africa. The continued occurrence of human cases has created a situation that could facilitate a pandemic emergence. There is heightened concern that wild birds are a reservoir for influenza A viruses that switch hosts and stably adapt to mammals, including horses, swine, and humans (11, 19, 22, 37).Despite the recent expansion of avian influenza virus (AIV) surveillance and genomic data (5, 17, 20, 21, 33, 40), fundamental questions remain concerning the ecology and evolution of these viruses. Little is known about how terrestrial wild mammals within their natural ecological systems affect HPAI H5N1 epidemiology or about the virus''s effects on public health, though there are many reports of natural and experimental H5N1 virus infection in animals belonging to the taxonomic orders Carnivora (12, 13, 15, 28, 29) and Artiodactyla (15). Herein, we provide the results of our investigation into H5N1 virus infection in wild pikas (Ochotona curzoniae of the order Lagomorpha) within their natural ecological setting. We describe our attempt to trace the circulation of H5N1 viruses and to characterize pika H5N1 influenza virus (PK virus).     

Reassortment between Avian H5N1 and Human H3N2 Influenza Viruses in Ferrets: a Public Health Risk Assessment

This study investigated whether transmissible H5 subtype human-avian reassortant viruses could be generated in vivo. To this end, ferrets were coinfected with recent avian H5N1 (A/Thailand/16/04) and human H3N2 (A/Wyoming/3/03) viruses. Genotype analyses of plaque-purified viruses from nasal secretions of coinfected ferrets revealed that approximately 9% of recovered viruses contained genes from both progenitor viruses. H5 and H3 subtype viruses, including reassortants, were found in airways extending toward and in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets. However, only parental H5N1 genotype viruses were found in lung tissue. Approximately 34% of the recovered reassortant viruses possessed the H5 hemagglutinin (HA) gene, with five unique H5 subtypes recovered. These H5 reassortants were selected for further studies to examine their growth and transmissibility characteristics. Five H5 viruses with representative reassortant genotypes showed reduced titers in nasal secretions of infected ferrets compared to the parental H5N1 virus. No transmission by direct contact between infected and naïve ferrets was observed. These studies indicate that reassortment between H5N1 avian influenza and H3N2 human viruses occurred readily in vivo and furthermore that reassortment between these two viral subtypes is likely to occur in ferret upper airways. Given the relatively high incidence of reassortant viruses from tissues of the ferret upper airway, it is reasonable to conclude that continued exposure of humans and animals to H5N1 alongside seasonal influenza viruses increases the risk of generating H5 subtype reassortant viruses that may be shed from upper airway secretions.Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses of the H5N1 subtype have caused devastating outbreaks in avian species during the past decade. After emerging in the Guangdong province of China in 1996, H5N1 viruses have extended their geographic distribution from Asia into Europe and Africa (45, 51). Sporadic transmission of H5N1 viruses from infected birds to humans has resulted in over 380 laboratory-confirmed infections and a case fatality rate of ∼60% since 2003 (48). Currently circulating H5N1 viruses lack the ability to undergo efficient and sustained transmission among humans although instances of limited human-to-human transmission have been reported (13, 41). If H5N1 viruses were to acquire genetic changes that confer efficient transmissibility among humans, then another pandemic would likely occur.The pandemics of 1957 and 1968 highlight the importance of genetic reassortment between avian and human influenza viruses as a mechanism for the generation of human pandemic strains (15, 46, 47). The structural separation of the influenza virus genome into eight independent genes allows formation of hybrid progeny viruses during coinfections. The 1957 H2N2 and 1968 H3N2 pandemic viruses acquired the hemagglutinin (HA) and PB1 genes, with or without the neuraminidase (NA) gene, respectively, from an avian virus progenitor (14, 33). The remaining genes of these pandemic reassortants were derived from a contemporary human virus (14, 33). The host species in which such human pandemic strains were generated by reassortment between human and avian viruses is not known. However, coinfection of the same cell with both human and avian viruses must have occurred, even though human and avian influenza viruses have preferences for different sialic acid receptor structures present on cell surface glycoproteins and glycolipids (20, 30). The HA of human viruses preferentially binds α(2,6)-linked sialic acids while that of avian viruses preferentially bind α(2,3)-linked sialic acids (3, 12). Cells possessing both of these receptors could support coinfection of avian and human viruses, leading to reassortment.Human respiratory tract epithelial cells can possess surface glycans with α(2,3)- and α(2,6)-linked sialic acids and as such represent a potential host for the generation of avian-human reassortant viruses (24, 35). The general distribution of surface α(2,3)- and α(2,6)-linked sialic acids varies among cells of the human upper and lower respiratory tracts, which are anatomically separated by the larynx. Recent studies have shown that α(2,3)-linked sialic acids are present in tissues of the human lower respiratory tract (i.e., lung alveolar cells) (24, 35) as well as tissues of the human upper respiratory tract (24). Consistent with these findings, HPAI H5N1 viruses have been shown to attach to and infect tissues belonging to the lower respiratory tract (i.e., trachea, bronchi, and lung) (5, 25, 35, 40, 42, 43) as well as tissues belonging to the upper respiratory tract (i.e., nasopharyngeal, adenoid, and tonsillar) (25). Glycans with α(2,6)-linked sialic acids are more widespread on epithelial cells of the upper airways than lung alveoli (24, 35). In accordance, human seasonal influenza viruses preferentially attach to and infect cells of the upper respiratory tract (6, 25, 35, 43). If cells with both types of receptors are present in the human respiratory tract, simultaneous infection of a person with both human and avian viruses could generate reassortant viruses.Although viruses derived by reassortment between avian H5N1 and human H3N2 progenitors have been generated in vitro (17), reassortment between these avian and human strains in a coinfected mammalian host has not been shown. Furthermore, our knowledge of the genetic and phenotypic repertoire of such reassortants generated in vivo and their potential for transmission to uninfected hosts is limited (2, 17). In the present study, we used the ferret model to better understand the generation of reassortant viruses in a host coinfected with contemporary avian (H5N1) and human (H3N2) viruses and the extent to which such reassortants replicate and transmit from animal to animal. The domestic ferret (Mustela putoris) serves as an ideal small-animal model for influenza because ferrets are susceptible to human and avian influenza viruses, including HPAI H5N1 viruses, and reflect the relative transmissibility of human and avian influenza viruses in humans (9, 17, 18, 31, 36, 39, 53). Our study revealed that coinfection of ferrets reproducibly generated reassortant viruses that could be recovered from tissues within and extending toward the upper respiratory tract. Although H5 reassortant viruses were recovered from the upper airways, they displayed no transmissibility to contact ferrets, suggesting that additional functional changes are required for these viral subtypes to become pandemic within human populations.     

The receptor-binding domain of influenza virus hemagglutinin produced in Escherichia coli folds into its native, immunogenic structure

The hemagglutinin (HA) surface glycoprotein promotes influenza virus entry and is the key protective antigen in natural immunity and vaccines. The HA protein is a trimeric envelope glycoprotein consisting of a globular receptor-binding domain (HA-RBD) that is inserted into a membrane fusion-mediating stalk domain. Similar to other class I viral fusion proteins, the fusogenic stalk domain spontaneously refolds into its postfusion conformation when expressed in isolation, consistent with this domain being trapped in a metastable conformation. Using X-ray crystallography, we show that the influenza virus HA-RBD refolds spontaneously into its native, immunogenic structure even when expressed in an unglycosylated form in Escherichia coli. In the 2.10-Å structure of the HA-RBD, the receptor-binding pocket is intact and its conformational epitopes are preserved. Recombinant HA-RBD is immunogenic and protective in ferrets, and the protein also binds with specificity to sera from influenza virus-infected humans. Overall, the data provide a structural basis for the rapid production of influenza vaccines in E. coli. From an evolutionary standpoint, the ability of the HA-RBD to refold spontaneously into its native conformation suggests that influenza virus acquired this domain as an insertion into an ancestral membrane-fusion domain. The insertion of independently folding domains into fusogenic stalk domains may be a common feature of class I viral fusion proteins.The genetic drift of seasonal influenza viruses and the occasional emergence of pandemic strains represent a continuing and serious burden on human health. Pandemic influenza viruses arise at irregular intervals, can infect up to 50% or more of the population, and vary in disease severity. Most notably, the H1N1 Spanish influenza pandemic of 1918 killed an estimated 20 to 50 million people worldwide, and the 1957 H2N2 Asian flu and 1968 H3N2 Hong Kong flu pandemics killed between 0.5 and 1 million people in the United States alone (30). The ongoing danger of influenza was recently emphasized by the emergence of the novel H1N1 pandemic virus from Mexico in April of 2009. The urgent need to speed up vaccine production was highlighted by this outbreak because over 340,000 confirmed cases and 4,100 deaths had occurred worldwide during the 6 months that were necessary to produce a vaccine using current procedures (39).As the major surface antigen of influenza A viruses, the hemagglutinin (HA) envelope glycoprotein is the primary source of natural immunity and the key target in vaccination. However, changes in the antigenic sites of the HA protein due to antigenic drift result in lost or diminished immunity acquired from previous infection or vaccination (35). This necessitates the production of new vaccines against seasonal influenza viruses each year. The HA protein also plays a central role in the emergence of human pandemic influenza viruses. There are 16 known antigenic subtypes of HA proteins in influenza A viruses (H1 through H16), and a pandemic occurs when an influenza virus that has an HA protein to which most of the population lacks immunity acquires the ability to be efficiently transmitted from person to person.The HA protein has multiple roles in the virus life cycle, notably receptor binding and membrane fusion. The protein is synthesized as a single precursor protein, HA₀, that trimerizes and becomes glycosylated in the endoplasmic reticulum as it traffics to the cell surface (33). The HA protein contains multiple disulfide bonds and is cleaved into a mature form consisting of two subunits, HA₁ and HA₂ (9, 18). HA₂ and the N- and C-terminal portions of HA₁ form a membrane-proximal stalk that mediates membrane fusion during viral entry (40). A receptor-binding domain (HA-RBD) forms the distal head of the molecule and is inserted into the HA₁ subunit. During virus entry, the HA-RBD engages sialic acid-containing receptors on the surface of the host cell, and the virion is subsequently internalized by endocytosis (33). Structurally and functionally, the HA-RBD is a member of the lectin superfamily, and the specificity of the binding pocket contributes to the host range of influenza viruses. For example, α(2,6)-containing sialosides are typically preferred by the HA protein from human viruses and α(2,3) sialosides by the HA proteins from avian viruses (13, 28). Upon triggering by the low-pH environment of endosomes, the HA protein undergoes an irreversible conformational change (6, 40) during which the intact HA-RBDs dissociate from the stalk of the trimer (3, 14, 19, 21). This observation, together with the manner in which the lectin-like domain is inserted as a folded module into the full-length HA protein, led us to hypothesize that the HA-RBD is able to adopt its native structure in isolation. Proper folding of the isolated HA-RBD into its native immunogenic structure has important therapeutic implications because the domain contains all of the known HA antigenic epitopes responsible for antibody recognition (5), and producing a protein-based influenza vaccine composed of isolated HA-RBD would dramatically speed up vaccine development during the early stages of a pandemic.In a recently published report, a construct of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 HA protein that encompasses the HA-RBD, designated HA_63-286-RBD, was expressed in Escherichia coli as inclusion bodies, refolded and purified, and used as a vaccine to produce immunity in ferrets (2). In this report, we show that this construct behaves as a stable, structured protein in solution, can be readily crystallized, and indeed adopts a structure that is virtually indistinguishable from that in the H1N1 HA protein ectodomain (41).