The First Transmembrane Domain of the Hepatitis B Virus Large Envelope Protein Is Crucial for Infectivity

The early steps of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) life cycle are still poorly understood. Indeed, neither the virus receptor at the cell surface nor the mechanism by which nucleocapsids are delivered to the cytosol of infected cells has been identified. Extensive mutagenesis studies in pre-S1, pre-S2, and most of the S domain of envelope proteins revealed the presence of two regions essential for HBV infectivity: the 77 first residues of the pre-S1 domain and a conformational motif in the antigenic loop of the S domain. In addition, at the N-terminal extremity of the S domain, a putative fusion peptide, partially overlapping the first transmembrane (TM1) domain and preceded by a PEST sequence likely containing several proteolytic cleavage sites, was identified. Since no mutational analysis of these two motifs potentially implicated in the fusion process was performed, we decided to investigate the ability of viruses bearing contiguous deletions or substitutions in the putative fusion peptide and PEST sequence to infect HepaRG cells. By introducing the mutations either in the L and M proteins or in the S protein, we demonstrated the following: (i) that in the TM1 domain of the L protein, three hydrophobic clusters of four residues were necessary for infectivity; (ii) that the same clusters were critical for S protein expression; and, finally, (iii) that the PEST sequence was dispensable for both assembly and infection processes.The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the main human pathogen responsible for severe hepatic diseases like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though infection can be prevented by immunization with an efficient vaccine, about 2 billion people have been infected worldwide, resulting in 350 million chronic carriers that are prone to develop liver diseases (56). Current treatments consist either of the use of interferon α, which modulates antiviral defenses and controls infection in 30 to 40% of cases, or of the use of viral polymerase inhibitors that allow a stronger response to treatment but require long-term utilization and frequently lead to the outcome of resistant viruses (34, 55). A better understanding of the virus life cycle, and particularly of the mechanism by which the virus enters the cell, could provide background for therapeutics that inhibit the early steps of infection, as recently illustrated with the HBV pre-S1-derived entry inhibitor (25, 45).HBV belongs to the Hepadnaviridae family whose members infect different species. All viruses of this family share common properties. The capsid containing a partially double-stranded circular DNA genome is surrounded by a lipid envelope, in which two (in avihepadnaviruses infecting birds) or three (in orthohepadnaviruses infecting mammals) envelope proteins are embedded. A single open reading frame bearing several translation initiation sites encodes these surface proteins. Thus, the HBV envelope contains three proteins: S, M, and L that share the same C-terminal extremity corresponding to the small S protein that is crucial for virus assembly (7, 8, 46) and infectivity (1, 31, 53). These proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), assembled, and secreted as particles through the Golgi apparatus (15, 42). The current model for the transmembrane structure of the S domain implies the luminal exposition of both N- and C-terminal extremities and the presence of four transmembrane (TM) domains: the TM1 and TM2 domains, both necessary for cotranslational protein integration into the ER membrane, and the TM3 and TM4 domains, located in the C-terminal third of the S domain (for a review, see reference 6). Among the four predicted TM domains, only the TM2 domain has a defined position between amino acids 80 and 98 of the S domain. The exact localization of the TM1 domain is still unclear, probably because of the relatively low hydrophobicity of its sequence, which contains polar residues and two prolines. The M protein corresponds to the S protein extended by an N-terminal domain of 55 amino acids called pre-S2. Its presence is dispensable for both assembly and infectivity (20, 21, 37). Finally, the L protein corresponds to the M protein extended by an N-terminal domain of 108 amino acids called pre-S1 (genotype D). The pre-S1 and pre-S2 domains of the L protein can be present either at the inner face of viral particles (on the cytoplasmic side of the ER), playing a crucial role in virus assembly (5, 8, 10, 11, 46), or on the outer face (on the luminal side of the ER), available for the interaction with target cells and necessary for viral infectivity (4, 14, 36). The pre-S translocation is independent from the M and S proteins and is driven by the L protein TM2 domain (33). Finally, HBV surface proteins are not only incorporated into virion envelopes but also spontaneously bud from ER-Golgi intermediate compartment membranes (30, 43) to form empty subviral particles (SVPs) that are released from the cell by secretion (8, 40).One approach to decipher viral entry is to interfere with the function of envelope proteins. Thus, by a mutagenesis approach, two envelope protein domains crucial for HBV infectivity have already been identified: (i) the 77 first amino acids of the pre-S1 domain (4, 36) including the myristic acid at the N-terminal extremity (9, 27) and (ii) possibly a cysteine motif in the luminal loop of the S domain (1, 31). In addition, a putative fusion peptide has been identified at the N-terminal extremity of the S domain due to its sequence homology with other viral fusion peptides (50). This sequence, either N-terminal in the S protein or internal in the L and M proteins, is conserved among the Hepadnaviridae family and shares common structural and functional properties with other fusion peptides (49, 50). Finally, a PEST sequence likely containing several proteolytic cleavage sites has been identified in the L and M proteins upstream of the TM1 domain (39). A cleavage within this sequence could activate the fusion peptide.In this study, we investigated whether the putative fusion peptide and the PEST sequence were necessary for the infection process. For this purpose, we constructed a set of mutant viruses bearing contiguous deletions in these regions and determined their infectivity using an in vitro infection model based on HepaRG cells (28). The introduction of mutations either in the L and M proteins or in only the S protein allowed us to demonstrate that, in the TM1 domain of L protein, three hydrophobic clusters not essential for viral assembly were crucial for HBV infectivity while their presence in the S protein was critical for envelope protein expression. In addition, we showed that the PEST sequence was clearly dispensable for both assembly and infection processes.     

The Pre-S1 and Antigenic Loop Infectivity Determinants of the Hepatitis B Virus Envelope Proteins Are Functionally Independent

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) envelope proteins bear two determinants of viral entry: a receptor-binding site (RBS) in the pre-S1 domain of the large envelope protein and a conformation-dependent determinant, of unknown function, in the antigenic loop (AGL) of the small, middle, and large envelope proteins. Using an in vitro infection assay consisting of susceptible HepaRG cells and the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) as a surrogate of HBV, we first investigated whether subelements of the pre-S1 determinant (amino acids 2 to 75), i.e., the N-terminal myristoyl anchor, subdomain 2-48 (RBS), and subdomain 49-75, were functionally separable. In transcomplementation experiments, coexpression of two distinct infectivity-deficient pre-S1 mutants at the surface of HDV virions failed to restore infectivity, indicating that the myristoyl anchor, the 2-48 RBS, and the 49-75 sequence, likely cooperate in cis at viral entry. Furthermore, we showed that as much as 52% of total pre-S1 in the HDV envelope could bear infectivity-deficient lesions without affecting entry, indicating that a small number of pre-S1 polypeptides—estimated at three to four per virion—is sufficient for infectivity. We next investigated the AGL activity in the small or large envelope protein background (S- and L-AGL, respectively) and found that lesions in S-AGL were more deleterious to infectivity than in L-AGL, a difference that reflects the relative stoichiometry of the small and large envelope proteins in the viral envelope. Finally, we showed that C147S, an AGL infectivity-deficient substitution, exerted a dominant-negative effect on infectivity, likely reflecting an involvement of C147 in intermolecular disulfide bonds.Hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a major public health concern worldwide, affecting more than 350 millions of chronically infected individuals. Since the discovery of HBV, substantial information has been gathered on the viral replication cycle, but our understanding of the viral entry mechanism remains limited, and the identity of the receptor(s) for HBV is still unknown (15). HBV displays a very narrow host range, which is likely determined at viral entry by a highly specific interaction between the HBV envelope proteins and receptors at the surface of human hepatocytes. The envelope proteins designated large (L-HBsAg), middle (M-HBsAg), and small (S-HBsAg) are membrane-spanning glycoproteins that differ from each other by the size of their N-terminal ectodomain (21). L-HBsAg contains a N-terminal pre-S1, central pre-S2, and C-terminal S domains. M-HBsAg is shorter than L-HBsAg in lacking pre-S1, whereas S-HBsAg consists of the S domain only (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Envelope protein synthesis occurs at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Empty subviral particles (SVPs) assemble from aggregates at a pre-Golgi membrane and exit the cell through the secretory pathway (36). Assembly of mature HBV virions requires, in addition to S-HBsAg, the presence of L-HBsAg as a matrix protein for nucleocapsid envelopment (6). Recent findings indicate that HBV virions and SVPs follow distinct pathways for budding: the late endosomal multivesicular bodies (MVBs) for HBV virions, and the MVB-independent secretory pathway for SVPs (26, 28, 46). The HBV envelope proteins can also package the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribonucleoprotein (RNP), in case of HBV/HDV coinfection (5, 45), leading to the formation of HDV virions. Whether HDV uses the SVP secretion pathway rather than an MVB-dependent route is uncertain.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic representation of HBV envelope proteins. The topology of the L-, M-, and S-HBsAg proteins at the viral membrane is represented. The pre-S2 domain of L- and M-HBsAg, and the determinants of viral entry, pre-S1 and AGL, are indicated. The M-HBsAg protein, represented in gray, is dispensable for infectivity. The myristic acid (Myr) linked to the L-HBsAg N terminus is indicated (closed box). Subdomains 2-48 and 49-75 of the pre-S1 infectivity determinant are indicated. Open boxes represent transmembrane regions in the S domain.L-HBsAg, but not M-HBsAg, is crucial to infectivity of both HBV and HDV particles (13, 31, 41, 42). L-HBsAg contains a major infectivity determinant located between amino acid residues 2 and 75 of its N-terminal pre-S1 domain (4, 30), including a myristoyl anchor linked to glycine-2 (1, 8, 18), a putative receptor binding site (RBS) between positions 2 and 48, and a domain of unknown function between amino acids 49 and 75. To date, the most compelling evidence that pre-S1 mediates receptor binding comes from studies demonstrating that myristoylated synthetic peptides specific for the N-terminal 2-to-48 pre-S1 domain can bind to hepatocyte plasma membranes and block infection in vitro (3, 16, 17) and in vivo (37). Beside pre-S1, a second determinant was recently identified in the antigenic loop (AGL) borne by the three HBV envelope proteins (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The AGL participation in viral entry was first established in the HDV model (23) and more recently directly in the HBV model (39). Interestingly, serine substitutions for the AGL cysteine residues, which prove detrimental to the conserved immunodominant “a” determinant, could also block viral entry. Note that the “a” determinant consists in conformational epitopes, which elicit highly neutralizing antibodies (22). Infectivity and the “a” determinant were also lost when virions were treated with membrane-impermeable inhibitors of thiol/disulfide isomerization (2). These findings clearly established a correlation between the AGL cysteine disulfide bonds network, the conformation of the “a” determinant, and infectivity. Hence, the strict conservation of the “a” determinant among all HBV genotypes is related to the AGL function at viral entry. The AGL determinant may operate in association with, or independently of pre-S1, in binding to receptors at the early step of entry and/or in the mechanism of envelope disassembly postentry.In the present study, we investigated the pre-S1 determinant by performing transcomplementation experiments between mutants of 3 pre-S1 subelements: the myristoyl anchor, subdomain 2-48, and subdomain 49-75. We analyzed the activity of the AGL determinant in the S- or L-HBsAg background (S- and L-AGL, respectively), and we examined the effect of introducing increasing amounts of infectivity-deficient pre-S1, or AGL, in the virion''s envelope on infectivity.     

Impaired Quality of the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)-Specific T-Cell Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-HBV Coinfection

Hepatits B virus (HBV)-specific T cells play a key role both in the control of HBV replication and in the pathogenesis of liver disease. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coinfection and the presence or absence of HBV e (precore) antigen (HBeAg) significantly alter the natural history of chronic HBV infection. We examined the HBV-specific T-cell responses in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HIV-1-HBV-coinfected (n = 24) and HBV-monoinfected (n = 39) Asian patients. Peripheral blood was stimulated with an overlapping peptide library for the whole HBV genome, and tumor necrosis factor alpha and gamma interferon cytokine expression in CD8⁺ T cells was measured by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. There was no difference in the overall magnitude of the HBV-specific T-cell responses, but the quality of the response was significantly impaired in HIV-1-HBV-coinfected patients compared with monoinfected patients. In coinfected patients, HBV-specific T cells rarely produced more than one cytokine and responded to fewer HBV proteins than in monoinfected patients. Overall, the frequency and quality of the HBV-specific T-cell responses increased with a higher CD4⁺ T-cell count (P = 0.018 and 0.032, respectively). There was no relationship between circulating HBV-specific T cells and liver damage as measured by activity and fibrosis scores, and the HBV-specific T-cell responses were not significantly different in patients with either HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative disease. The quality of the HBV-specific T-cell response is impaired in the setting of HIV-1-HBV coinfection and is related to the CD4⁺ T-cell count.There are 40 million people worldwide infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), and 6 to 15% of HIV-1-infected patients are also chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) (13, 20, 35, 38, 40-42, 47, 50, 61, 69). The highest rates of coinfection with HIV-1 and HBV are in Asia and Africa, where HBV is endemic (33, 68). Following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), liver disease is now the major cause of non-AIDS-related deaths in HIV-1-infected patients (12, 13, 38, 59, 65).Coinfection of HBV with HIV-1 alters the natural history of HBV infection. Individuals with HIV-1-HBV coinfection seroconvert from HBV e (precore) antigen (HBeAg) to HBV e antibody less frequently and have higher HBV DNA levels but lower levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and milder necroinflammatory activity on histology than those infected with HBV alone (18, 26, 49). Progression to cirrhosis, however, seems to be more rapid and more common, and liver-related mortality is higher, in HIV-1-HBV coinfection than with either infection alone (47, 59). HBeAg is an accessory protein of HBV and is not required for viral replication or infection; however, chronic HBV infection typically is divided into two distinct phases: HBeAg positive and HBeAg negative (reviewed in reference 15). Most natural history studies of HIV-1-HBV coinfection to date have primarily focused on HBeAg-positive patients from non-Asian countries (23, 44, 46).We previously developed an overlapping peptide library for the HBV genome to detect HBV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses to all HBV gene products from multiple HBV genotypes (17). In a small cross-sectional study of patients recruited in Australia, we found that in coinfected patients, HBV-specific CD4⁺ T-cell responses, as measured by gamma interferon (IFN-γ) production, were diminished compared to those seen in HBV-monoinfected patients (17). However, patients had varying lengths of exposure to anti-HBV-active HAART at the time of analysis. In this study, therefore, we aimed to characterize the HBV-specific T-cell response in untreated HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative HIV-1-HBV-coinfected patients and to determine the relationship between the HBV-specific immune response, HBeAg status, and liver disease.     

Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus Replication Upregulates Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal,Resulting in Cellular Resistance to Serine Protease-Dependent Apoptosis

Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV, respectively) are different and distinct viruses, but there are striking similarities in their disease potential. Infection by either virus can cause chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and ultimately, liver cancer, despite the fact that no pathogenetic mechanisms are known which are shared by the two viruses. Our recent studies have suggested that replication of either of these viruses upregulates a cellular protein called serine protease inhibitor Kazal (SPIK). Furthermore, the data have shown that cells containing HBV and HCV are more resistant to serine protease-dependent apoptotic death. Since our previous studies have shown that SPIK is an inhibitor of serine protease-dependent apoptosis, it is hypothesized that the upregulation of SPIK caused by HBV and HCV replication leads to cell resistance to apoptosis. The evasion of apoptotic death by infected cells results in persistent viral replication and constant liver inflammation, which leads to gradual accumulation of genetic changes and eventual development of cancer. These findings suggest a possibility by which HBV and HCV, two very different viruses, can share a common mechanism in provoking liver disease and cancer.Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are serious worldwide health problems, with more than 500 million people believed to be chronically infected with at least one of these viruses (36). HBV is a DNA virus belonging to the Hepadnaviridae family (21), while HCV is an RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family (7). Despite the fact that they are two very different viruses, they share a common pathology in the ability to cause chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and ultimately, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (34). It remains unclear why these two viruses, which are fundamentally so different, can both lead to similar disease states and the development of HCC.Numerous studies suggest that in chronic viral hepatitis, the host''s immune system is unable to clear infected cells (34). The persistent viral replication further stimulates liver inflammation, and prolonged inflammation and viral persistence result in a gradual accumulation of genetic changes which can subsequently lead to transformation and development of HCC (3, 13). It is possible that part of this failure of the host to clear infected cells results from an inability to induce apoptosis in these cells. For example, persistent HBV/HCV infection suppresses cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL)-induced apoptosis (3, 4). Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, plays a critical role in embryonic development, immune system function, and the overall maintenance of tissue homeostasis in multicellular organisms. It is also important in the host''s control of viral infection (4). The execution of the apoptotic program has traditionally been considered the result of the activation of a family of proteases known as caspases. Caspase-dependent cell apoptosis (CDCA) usually initiates by activating caspases 8 and 10 through proteolysis of their proenzymes, which further activates the executioner caspases, such as caspase 3 and caspase 7, resulting in the degradation of chromosomal DNA and cell death (28, 29). Recent evidence, however, has suggested that apoptotic cell death can also be promoted and triggered by serine proteases in a caspase-independent manner (5, 6, 39). Serine protease-dependent cell apoptosis (SPDCA) differs from CDCA in that serine proteases, not caspases, are critical to the apoptotic process (1, 6, 39). Interestingly, certain viral infections have been shown to induce SPDCA (27, 39).Failure of the immune-mediated removal of malignant cells through apoptosis may be due to the upregulation of apoptosis inhibitors in these cells (12, 18). We recently demonstrated that SPDCA can be inhibited by a small, 79-amino-acid protein called serine protease inhibitor Kazal (SPIK) (22). SPIK, which is also known as SPINK1, TATI (tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor), and PSTI (pancreas secretory trypsin inhibitor) (8, 24, 38), was first discovered in the pancreas as an inhibitor of autoactivation of trypsinogen (9). The expression of SPIK in normal tissue is limited or inactivated outside the pancreas, but expression of SPIK is elevated in numerous cancers, such as colorectal tumors, renal cell carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (16, 19, 24, 31, 40, 41). It remains unknown, however, what role SPIK may play in cancer formation and development. Additionally, overexpression of SPIK was also found in HBV/HCV-infected human livers (32), and an even higher level of expression of SPIK was found in HBV/HCV-associated HCC tissue (19, 31). This implies that SPIK may be closely associated with hepatitis virus infection and development of HCC.Here we show direct evidence that HBV/HCV replication does in fact upregulate expression of the apoptosis inhibitor SPIK, resulting in resistance to SPDCA, which could ultimately lead to the development of chronic hepatitis and liver cancer.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

Interferons Accelerate Decay of Replication-Competent Nucleocapsids of Hepatitis B Virus

Alpha interferon (IFN-α) is an approved medication for chronic hepatitis B. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) is a key mediator of host antiviral immunity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in vivo. However, the molecular mechanism by which these antiviral cytokines suppress HBV replication remains elusive. Using an immortalized murine hepatocyte (AML12)-derived cell line supporting tetracycline-inducible HBV replication, we show in this report that both IFN-α and IFN-γ efficiently reduce the amount of intracellular HBV nucleocapsids. Furthermore, we provide evidence suggesting that the IFN-induced cellular antiviral response is able to distinguish and selectively accelerate the decay of HBV replication-competent nucleocapsids but not empty capsids in a proteasome-dependent manner. Our findings thus reveal a novel antiviral mechanism of IFNs and provide a basis for a better understanding of HBV pathobiology.Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a noncytopathic hepatotropic DNA virus which belongs to the family Hepadnaviridae (11, 44). Despite the fact that most adulthood HBV infections are transient, approximately 5 to 10% of infected adults and more than 90% of infected neonates fail to clear the virus and develop a lifelong persistent infection, which may progress to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and primary hepatocellular carcinoma (4, 33, 34). It has been shown by several research groups that resolution of HBV and other animal hepadnavirus infection in vivo depends on both killing of infected hepatocytes by viral antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and noncytolytic suppression of viral replication, which is most likely mediated by inflammatory cytokines, such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (10, 12, 15, 20, 26, 27, 48). Moreover, together with five nucleoside or nucleotide analogs that inhibit HBV DNA polymerase, alpha IFN (IFN-α) and pegylated IFN-α are currently available antiviral medications for the management of chronic hepatitis B. Compared to the viral DNA polymerase inhibitors, the advantages of IFN-α therapy include a lack of drug resistance, a finite and defined treatment course, and an increased likelihood for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance (8, 39). However, only approximately 30% of treated patients achieve a sustained virological response to a standard 48-month pegylated IFN-α therapy (6, 32). Thus far, the antiviral mechanism of IFN-α and IFN-γ and the parameters determining the success or failure of IFN-α therapy in chronic hepatitis B remain elusive. Elucidation of the mechanism by which the cytokines suppress HBV replication represents an important step toward understanding the pathobiology of HBV infection and the molecular basis of IFN-α therapy of chronic hepatitis B.Considering the mechanism by which IFNs noncytolytically control HBV infection in vivo, it is possible that the cytokines either induce an antiviral response in hepatocytes to directly limit HBV replication or modulate the host antiviral immune response to indirectly inhibit the virus infection. However, due to the fact that IFN-α and -γ do not inhibit or only modestly inhibit HBV replication in human hepatoma-derived cell lines (5, 22, 23, 30), the direct antiviral effects of the cytokines and their antiviral mechanism against HBV have been studied with either an immortalized hepatocyte cell line derived from HBV transgenic mice or duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) infection of primary duck hepatocytes (37, 53). While these studies revealed that IFN treatment significantly reduced the amount of encapsidated viral pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) in both mouse and duck hepatocytes, further mechanistic analyses suggested that IFN-α inhibited the formation of pgRNA-containing nucleocapsids in murine hepatocytes (52) but shortened the half-life of encapsidated pgRNA in DHBV-replicating chicken hepatoma cells (21). Moreover, the fate of viral DNA replication intermediates or nucleocapsids in the IFN-treated hepatocytes was not investigated in the previous studies.To further define the target(s) of IFN-α and -γ in the HBV life cycle and to create a robust cell culture system for the identification of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) that mediate the antiviral response of the cytokines (25), we established an immortalized murine hepatocyte (AML-12)-derived stable cell line that supported a high level of HBV replication in a tetracycline-inducible manner. Consistent with previous reports, we show that both IFN-α and IFN-γ potently inhibited HBV replication in murine hepatocytes (37, 40). With the help of small molecules that inhibit HBV capsid assembly (Bay-4109) (7, 47) and prevent the incorporation of pgRNA into nucleocapsids (AT-61) (9, 29), we obtained evidence suggesting that the IFN-induced cellular antiviral response is able to distinguish and selectively accelerate the decay of HBV replication-competent nucleocapsids but not empty capsids in a proteasome-dependent manner. Our findings provide a basis for further studies toward better understanding of IFN′s antiviral mechanism, which might ultimately lead to the development of strategies to improve the efficacy of IFN therapy of chronic hepatitis B.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Trafficking of UL37 Proteins into Mitochondrion-Associated Membranes during Permissive Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 proteins traffic sequentially from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the mitochondria. In transiently transfected cells, UL37 proteins traffic into the mitochondrion-associated membranes (MAM), the site of contact between the ER and mitochondria. In HCMV-infected cells, the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, trafficked into the ER, the MAM, and the mitochondria. Surprisingly, a component of the MAM calcium signaling junction complex, cytosolic Grp75, was increasingly enriched in heavy MAM from HCMV-infected cells. These studies show the first documented case of a herpesvirus protein, HCMV pUL37x1, trafficking into the MAM during permissive infection and HCMV-induced alteration of the MAM protein composition.The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 immediate early (IE) locus expresses multiple products, including the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, also known as viral mitochondrion-localized inhibitor of apoptosis (vMIA), during lytic infection (16, 22, 24, 39, 44). The UL37 glycoprotein (gpUL37) shares UL37x1 sequences and is internally cleaved, generating pUL37_NH2 and gpUL37_COOH (2, 22, 25, 26). pUL37x1 is essential for the growth of HCMV in humans (17) and for the growth of primary HCMV strains (20) and strain AD169 (14, 35, 39, 49) but not strain TownevarATCC in permissive human fibroblasts (HFFs) (27).pUL37x1 induces calcium (Ca²⁺) efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (39), regulates viral early gene expression (5, 10), disrupts F-actin (34, 39), recruits and inactivates Bax at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) (4, 31-33), and inhibits mitochondrial serine protease at late times of infection (28).Intriguingly, HCMV UL37 proteins localize dually in the ER and in the mitochondria (2, 9, 16, 17, 24-26). In contrast to other characterized, similarly localized proteins (3, 6, 11, 23, 30, 38), dual-trafficking UL37 proteins are noncompetitive and sequential, as an uncleaved gpUL37 mutant protein is ER translocated, N-glycosylated, and then imported into the mitochondria (24, 26).Ninety-nine percent of ∼1,000 mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and directly imported into the mitochondria (13). However, the mitochondrial import of ER-synthesized proteins is poorly understood. One potential pathway is the use of the mitochondrion-associated membrane (MAM) as a transfer waypoint. The MAM is a specialized ER subdomain enriched in lipid-synthetic enzymes, lipid-associated proteins, such as sigma-1 receptor, and chaperones (18, 45). The MAM, the site of contact between the ER and the mitochondria, permits the translocation of membrane-bound lipids, including ceramide, between the two organelles (40). The MAM also provides enriched Ca²⁺ microdomains for mitochondrial signaling (15, 36, 37, 43, 48). One macromolecular MAM complex involved in efficient ER-to-mitochondrion Ca²⁺ transfer is comprised of ER-bound inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3 (IP3R3), cytosolic Grp75, and a MOM-localized voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (42). Another MAM-stabilizing protein complex utilizes mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) to tether ER and mitochondrial organelles together (12).HCMV UL37 proteins traffic into the MAM of transiently transfected HFFs and HeLa cells, directed by their NH₂-terminal leaders (8, 47). To determine whether the MAM is targeted by UL37 proteins during infection, we fractionated HCMV-infected cells and examined pUL37x1 trafficking in microsomes, mitochondria, and the MAM throughout all temporal phases of infection. Because MAM domains physically bridge two organelles, multiple markers were employed to verify the purity and identity of the fractions (7, 8, 19, 46, 47).(These studies were performed in part by Chad Williamson in partial fulfillment of his doctoral studies in the Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Program at George Washington Institute of Biomedical Sciences.)HFFs and life-extended (LE)-HFFs were grown and not infected or infected with HCMV (strain AD169) at a multiplicity of 3 PFU/cell as previously described (8, 26, 47). Heavy (6,300 × g) and light (100,000 × g) MAM fractions, mitochondria, and microsomes were isolated at various times of infection and quantified as described previously (7, 8, 47). Ten- or 20-μg amounts of total lysate or of subcellular fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE in 4 to 12% Bis-Tris NuPage gels (Invitrogen) and examined by Western analyses (7, 8, 26). Twenty-microgram amounts of the fractions were not treated or treated with proteinase K (3 μg) for 20 min on ice, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and probed by Western analysis. The blots were probed with rabbit anti-UL37x1 antiserum (DC35), goat anti-dolichyl phosphate mannose synthase 1 (DPM1), goat anti-COX2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Grp75 (StressGen Biotechnologies), and the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (8, 47). Reactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Pierce), and images were digitized as described previously (26, 47).