CTnDOT Integrase Interactions with Attachment Site DNA and Control of Directionality of the Recombination Reaction

IntDOT is a tyrosine recombinase encoded by the conjugative transposon CTnDOT. The core binding (CB) and catalytic (CAT) domains of IntDOT interact with core-type sites adjacent to the regions of strand exchange, while the N-terminal arm binding (N) domain interacts with arm-type sites distal to the core. Previous footprinting experiments identified five arm-type sites, but how the arm-type sites participate in the integration and excision of CTnDOT was not known. In vitro integration assays with substrates containing arm-type site mutants demonstrated that attDOT sequences containing mutations in the L1 arm-type site or in the R1 and R2 or R1 and R2′ arm-type sites were dramatically defective in integration. Substrates containing mutations in the L1 and R1 arm-type sites showed a 10- to 20-fold decrease in detectable in vitro excision, but introduction of multiple arm-type site mutations in attR did not have an effect on the excision frequency. A sixth arm-type site, the R1′ site, was also identified and shown to be required for integration and important for efficient excision. These results suggest that intramolecular IntDOT interactions are required for integration, while the actions of accessory factors are more important for excision. Gel shift assays performed in the presence of core- and arm-type site DNAs showed that IntDOT affinity for the attDOT core was enhanced when IntDOT was simultaneously bound to arm-type site DNA.Conjugative transposons (CTns), also known as integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs), are mobile genetic elements that are widespread in Bacteroides spp. and are implicated in the spread of antibiotic resistance. These elements are normally integrated into the host chromosome but can excise, replicate, and transfer to a recipient cell by conjugation (34). Since CTns commonly carry antibiotic resistance genes, it is likely that the increase in antibiotic-resistant Bacteroides strains has been mediated through the lateral transfer of these elements (36). One of the best-studied ICEs in Bacteroides is the conjugative transposon CTnDOT. CTnDOT is 65 kb in size and carries genes encoding resistance to tetracycline and erythromycin. Over the past 30 years, the incidence of tetracycline resistance has increased to 80% of Bacteroides isolates due to the presence of CTnDOT-type elements (36).Integration and excision of CTnDOT results from site-specific recombination between regions of DNA known as attachment (att) sites. During integration, the joined ends of the closed circular intermediate (attDOT) recombine with the bacterial target sequence (attB) to form the recombinant sites (attL and attR). The integration reaction requires IntDOT, a CTnDOT-encoded protein that has been identified as a member of the tyrosine recombinase family, as well as a host factor encoded by Bacteroides (8, 21). Site-specific recombination between the attL and attR attachment sites results in excision of CTnDOT from the host chromosome. IntDOT is also required for excision, as are three element-encoded proteins: Orf2c, Orf2d, and Exc, as well a Bacteroides host factor (8, 38). The roles of these accessory proteins are not well understood, although Orf2c and Orf2d have been shown to bind DNA (unpublished results).One of the best-studied tyrosine recombinases is the integrase (Int) of the lambda system. The C terminus of Int includes the core binding (CB) and catalytic (CAT) domains that bind to core-type sites, which flank the sites of cleavage and strand exchange (2, 24). The N-terminal arm-binding (N) domain binds to arm-type sites that are distal to the core-type sites. In the presence of the appropriate host and accessory factors, Int binding to arm-type sites is required for the formation of higher-order protein/DNA complexes known as intasomes, which are required for integration and excision (15, 18, 22). Int is capable of making intramolecular interactions (interactions between Int monomers on the same attachment site) and intermolecular interactions (interactions between Int monomers on different attachment sites) during recombination (15, 16). In the lambda system, the directionality of the reaction is regulated by Int interactions with arm-type sites in conjunction with the integration host factor (IHF) during the formation of an integrative intasome, or IHF, Xis, and FIS during the formation of the two excisive intasomes (1, 4, 42).Presumably, IntDOT occupancy of specific arm-type sites in conjunction with interactions of accessory factors with att sites leads to the assembly of integrative or excisive intasomes and thus contributes to the directionality of IntDOT-mediated recombination. Previous DNase I footprinting experiments identified five arm-type binding sites on attDOT (11). In this study, mutations were constructed in the five sites to determine their roles in the integration and excision of CTnDOT. In addition, a sixth arm-type site was discovered that is important for both integrative and excisive recombination. The results of gel shift assays also show that the interaction of IntDOT with core-type sites and arm-type sites involves cooperative interactions.     

Repeat-Associated Plasticity in the Helicobacter pylori RD Gene Family

The bacterium Helicobacter pylori is remarkable for its ability to persist in the human stomach for decades without provoking sterilizing immunity. Since repetitive DNA can facilitate adaptive genomic flexibility via increased recombination, insertion, and deletion, we searched the genomes of two H. pylori strains for nucleotide repeats. We discovered a family of genes with extensive repetitive DNA that we have termed the H. pylori RD gene family. Each gene of this family is composed of a conserved 3′ region, a variable mid-region encoding 7 and 11 amino acid repeats, and a 5′ region containing one of two possible alleles. Analysis of five complete genome sequences and PCR genotyping of 42 H. pylori strains revealed extensive variation between strains in the number, location, and arrangement of RD genes. Furthermore, examination of multiple strains isolated from a single subject''s stomach revealed intrahost variation in repeat number and composition. Despite prior evidence that the protein products of this gene family are expressed at the bacterial cell surface, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot studies revealed no consistent seroreactivity to a recombinant RD protein by H. pylori-positive hosts. The pattern of repeats uncovered in the RD gene family appears to reflect slipped-strand mispairing or domain duplication, allowing for redundancy and subsequent diversity in genotype and phenotype. This novel family of hypervariable genes with conserved, repetitive, and allelic domains may represent an important locus for understanding H. pylori persistence in its natural host.Helicobacter pylori, a gram-negative bacterium, is remarkable for its ability to persist in the human stomach for decades. Colonization with H. pylori increases risk for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma (53, 70) and elicits a vigorous immune response (15). The persistence of H. pylori occurs in a niche in the human body previously considered inhospitable to microbial colonization: the acidic stomach replete with proteolytic enzymes.H. pylori strains exhibit substantial genetic diversity, including extensive variation in the presence, arrangement, order, and identity of genes (2, 4-7, 25, 51, 74). Furthermore, analyses of multiple single-colony H. pylori isolates from separate stomach biopsy specimens of individual patients have demonstrated diversity, both within hosts (27, 65), and over time (36). The mechanisms that generate H. pylori genetic diversity may be among the factors that enable persistence in this environment (3, 28).While the natural ability of H. pylori for transformation and recombination may explain some of the intra- and interhost genetic variation observed in this bacterium (43), point mutations and interspecies recombination alone are not sufficient for explaining the extent of the variation in H. pylori (14, 32). The initial genomic sequencing of H. pylori strains 26695 and J99 (6, 72) revealed large amounts of repetitive DNA (1, 59). DNA repeats in bacteria are associated with mechanisms of plasticity, such as phase variation (49, 67); slipped-strand mispairing (41, 46); and increased rates of recombination, deletion, and insertion (17, 60, 62). Because many of the recombination repair and mismatch repair mechanisms common in bacteria are absent or modified in H. pylori (28-30, 56, 76), this organism may be particularly susceptible to the diversifying effects of repetitive DNA. In fact, loci in the H. pylori genome containing repetitive DNA have been shown to exhibit extensive inter- and intrahost variation (9, 10, 28, 37).We hypothesized that identification of repetitive DNA hotspots in H. pylori would allow the recognition of genes whose variation could aid in persistence. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted in silico analyses to identify open reading frames (ORFs) enriched for DNA repeats and then used a combination of sequence analyses and immunoassays to examine the patterns associated with the specific repetitive DNA observed. Our approach led to the realization that a previously identified H. pylori-specific gene family (19, 52) exhibits extensive genetic variation at multiple levels.     

XRCC2 and XRCC3 Regulate the Balance between Short- and Long-Tract Gene Conversions between Sister Chromatids

Sister chromatid recombination (SCR) is a potentially error-free pathway for the repair of DNA lesions associated with replication and is thought to be important for suppressing genomic instability. The mechanisms regulating the initiation and termination of SCR in mammalian cells are poorly understood. Previous work has implicated all the Rad51 paralogs in the initiation of gene conversion and the Rad51C/XRCC3 complex in its termination. Here, we show that hamster cells deficient in the Rad51 paralog XRCC2, a component of the Rad51B/Rad51C/Rad51D/XRCC2 complex, reveal a bias in favor of long-tract gene conversion (LTGC) during SCR. This defect is corrected by expression of wild-type XRCC2 and also by XRCC2 mutants defective in ATP binding and hydrolysis. In contrast, XRCC3-mediated homologous recombination and suppression of LTGC are dependent on ATP binding and hydrolysis. These results reveal an unexpectedly general role for Rad51 paralogs in the control of the termination of gene conversion between sister chromatids.DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are potentially dangerous lesions, since their misrepair may cause chromosomal translocations, gene amplifications, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and other types of genomic instability characteristic of human cancers (7, 9, 21, 40, 76, 79). DSBs are repaired predominantly by nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination (HR), two evolutionarily conserved DSB repair mechanisms (8, 12, 16, 33, 48, 60, 71). DSBs generated during the S or G₂ phase of the cell cycle may be repaired preferentially by HR, using the intact sister chromatid as a template for repair (12, 26, 29, 32, 71). Sister chromatid recombination (SCR) is a potentially error-free pathway for the repair of DSBs, which has led to the proposal that SCR protects against genomic instability, cancer, and aging. Indeed, a number of human cancer predisposition genes are implicated in SCR control (10, 24, 45, 57, 75).HR entails an initial processing of the DSB to generate a free 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang (25, 48, 56). This is coupled to the loading of Rad51, the eukaryotic homolog of Escherichia coli RecA, which polymerizes to form an ssDNA-Rad51 “presynaptic” nucleoprotein filament. Formation of the presynaptic filament is tightly regulated and requires the concerted action of a large number of gene products (55, 66, 68). Rad51-coated ssDNA engages in a homology search by invading homologous duplex DNA. If sufficient homology exists between the invading and invaded strands, a triple-stranded synapse (D-loop) forms, and the 3′ end of the invading (nascent) strand is extended, using the donor as a template for gene conversion. This recombination intermediate is thought to be channeled into one of the following two major subpathways: classical gap repair or synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) (48). Gap repair entails the formation of a double Holliday junction, which may resolve into either crossover or noncrossover products. Although this is a major pathway in meiotic recombination, crossing-over is highly suppressed in somatic eukaryotic cells (26, 44, 48). Indeed, the donor DNA molecule is seldom rearranged during somatic HR, suggesting that SDSA is the major pathway for the repair of somatic DSBs (26, 44, 49, 69). SDSA terminates when the nascent strand is displaced from the D-loop and pairs with the second end of the DSB to form a noncrossover product. The mechanisms underlying displacement of the nascent strand are not well understood. However, failure to displace the nascent strand might be expected to result in the production of longer gene conversion tracts during HR (36, 44, 48, 63).Gene conversion triggered in response to a Saccharomyces cerevisiae or mammalian chromosomal DSB generally results in the copying of a short (50- to 300-bp) stretch of information from the donor (short-tract gene conversion [STGC]) (14, 47, 48, 67, 69). A minority of gene conversions in mammalian cells entail more-extensive copying, generating gene conversion tracts that are up to several kilobases in length (long-tract gene conversion [LTGC]) (26, 44, 51, 54, 64). In yeast, very long gene conversions can result from break-induced replication (BIR), a highly processive form of gene conversion in which a bona fide replication fork is thought to be established at the recombination synapse (11, 36, 37, 39, 61, 63). In contrast, SDSA does not require lagging-strand polymerases and appears to be much less processive than a conventional replication fork (37, 42, 78). BIR in yeast has been proposed to play a role in LOH in aging yeast, telomere maintenance, and palindromic gene amplification (5, 41, 52). It is unclear to what extent a BIR-like mechanism operates in mammalian cells, although BIR has been invoked to explain telomere elongation in tumors lacking telomerase (13). It is currently unknown whether LTGC and STGC in somatic mammalian cells are products of mechanistically distinct pathways or whether they represent alternative outcomes of a common SDSA pathway.Vertebrate cells contain five Rad51 paralogs—polypeptides with limited sequence homology to Rad51—Rad51B, Rad51C, Rad51D, XRCC2, and XRCC3 (74). The Rad51 paralogs form the following two major complexes: Rad51B/Rad51C/Rad51D/XRCC2 (BCDX2) and Rad51C/XRCC3 (CX3) (38, 73). Genetic deletion of any one of the rad51 paralogs in the mouse germ line produces early embryonic lethality, and mouse or chicken cells lacking any of the rad51 paralogs reveal hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, reduced frequencies of HR and of sister chromatid exchanges, increased chromatid-type errors, and defective sister chromatid cohesion (18, 72, 73, 82). Collectively, these data implicate the Rad51 paralogs in SCR regulation. The purified Rad51B/Rad51C complex has been shown to assist Rad51-mediated strand exchange (62). XRCC3 null or Rad51C null hamster cells reveal a bias toward production of longer gene conversion tracts, suggesting a role for the CX3 complex in late stages of SDSA (6, 44). Rad51C copurifies with branch migration and Holliday junction resolution activities in mammalian cell extracts (35), and XRCC3, but not XRCC2, facilitates telomere shortening by reciprocal crossing-over in telomeric T loops (77). These data, taken together with the meiotic defects observed in Rad51C hypomorphic mice, suggest a specialized role for CX3, but not for BCDX2, in resolving Holliday junction structures (31, 58).To further address the roles of Rad51 paralogs in late stages of recombination, we have studied the balance between long-tract (>1-kb) and short-tract (<1-kb) SCR in XRCC2 mutant hamster cells. We found that DSB-induced gene conversion in both XRCC2 and XRCC3 mutant cells is biased in favor of LTGC. These defects were suppressed by expression of wild-type (wt) XRCC2 or XRCC3, respectively, although the dependence upon ATP binding and hydrolysis differed between the two Rad51 paralogs. These results indicate that Rad51 paralogs play a more general role in determining the balance between STGC and LTGC than was previously appreciated and suggest roles for both the BCDX2 and CX3 complexes in influencing the termination of gene conversion in mammals.     

Roles of ExoI and SbcCD Nucleases in “Reckless” DNA Degradation in recA Mutants of Escherichia coli

Exponentially growing recA mutant cells of Escherichia coli display pronounced DNA degradation that starts at the sites of DNA damage and depends on RecBCD nuclease (ExoV) activity. As a consequence of this “reckless” DNA degradation, populations of recA mutants contain a large proportion of anucleate cells. We have found that both DNA degradation and anucleate-cell production are efficiently suppressed by mutations in the xonA (sbcB) and sbcD genes. The suppressive effects of these mutations were observed in normally grown, as well as in UV-irradiated, recA cells. The products of the xonA and sbcD genes are known to code for the ExoI and SbcCD nucleases, respectively. Since both xonA and sbcD mutations are required for strong suppression of DNA degradation while individual mutations have only a weak suppressive effect, we infer that ExoI and SbcCD play partially redundant roles in regulating DNA degradation in recA cells. We suggest that their roles might be in processing (blunting) DNA ends, thereby producing suitable substrates for RecBCD binding.The RecA protein plays a central role in homologous recombination and recombinational DNA repair in Escherichia coli, as well as in other bacterial species. It catalyzes the key stages of the recombination process—homologous pairing and DNA strand exchange. Cells carrying null mutations in the recA gene are completely deficient for homologous recombination and are extremely sensitive to DNA-damaging agents (for a review, see references 21, 24, and 25). Populations of recA null mutants contain a large proportion (50 to 60%) of nonviable cells, reflecting the inability of these mutants to repair spontaneously occurring DNA damage (31). Also, exponentially growing recA cells display pronounced spontaneous DNA degradation that presumably starts at the sites of DNA damage and that depends on RecBCD nuclease (ExoV) activity (5, 48). This phenotype of recA cells is aggravated after DNA-damaging treatment, such as UV irradiation (48).According to the present data, the majority of RecA-catalyzed DNA transactions in E. coli start with binding of the RecA protein onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) substrates. This binding is mediated by the RecBCD and/or RecFOR protein, which helps RecA to overcome hindrance imposed by the SSB protein during competition for the DNA substrate. The RecBCD and RecFOR proteins begin RecA polymerization on ssDNA, giving rise to a nucleoprotein filament that is indispensable for further recombination reactions (3, 33; reviewed in reference 44).The RecBCD enzyme is crucial for initiation of recombinational processes at double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) ends (or breaks [DSBs]) in wild-type E. coli (a set of reactions known as the RecBCD pathway) (9, 43, 44). Upon recognizing a blunt or nearly blunt dsDNA end and binding to it, RecBCD acts as a combination of powerful helicase and nuclease, thus unwinding and simultaneously degrading both strands of the DNA duplex. After encountering a specific octanucleotide sequence designated Chi, the strong 3′-5′ nuclease activity of the enzyme is attenuated and a weaker 5′-3′ nuclease activity is upregulated (1). This Chi-dependent modification allows RecBCD to create a long 3′ ssDNA tail and to direct the loading of RecA protein onto it (2, 3). In vivo data suggest that this transition of RecBCD from a nuclease to a recombinase mode of action requires the presence of the RecA protein, suggesting that the two proteins might interact (27).In wild-type E. coli cells, the RecFOR protein complex works predominantly on DNA gaps, which may arise in chromosomes due to replication forks passing over the noncoding lesions (e.g., UV-induced pyrimidine dimers) or may be present in replication forks stalled at different obstacles in DNA (44). On the other hand, the RecFOR complex has an important role in recBC sbcBC(D) mutant cells, replacing the RecA-loading activity of RecBCD during recombination reactions starting from dsDNA ends. Recombination reactions mediated by RecFOR proteins are termed the RecF (or RecFOR) pathway (44).Cells mutated in the recB and/or recC gene exhibit strong deficiency in conjugational and transductional recombination, as well as in the repair of DSBs (8, 21). These defects can be rectified by extragenic sbcB and sbcC(D) suppressor mutations that inactivate two nucleases, thus enabling full efficiency of the RecF pathway on dsDNA ends (21, 44). The sbcB gene (also designated xonA) encodes exonuclease I (ExoI), the enzyme that digests ssDNA in the 3′-5′ direction (23). The sbcC and sbcD genes encode subunits of the SbcCD nuclease, which acts both as an endonuclease that cleaves hairpin structures and as an exonuclease that degrades linear dsDNA molecules (10, 11). Inactivation of either of the two subunits leads to the loss of SbcCD enzyme activity (18).The exact mechanism of activation of the RecF pathway by sbc mutations is not completely understood. A plausible explanation is that inactivation of ExoI and SbcCD nucleases is necessary to prevent the degradation of recombinogenic 3′ DNA ends created in a RecBCD-independent manner (8, 23, 38, 45, 46). It was recently shown that the sbcB15 mutant allele (encoding a protein without nucleolytic activity) (37) is a better suppressor of the RecBCD⁻ phenotype than an sbcB deletion (50), suggesting that some nonnucleolytic activity of ExoI may also contribute to the efficiency of the RecF pathway (46, 50).ExoI and SbcCD are usually viewed as enzymes with inhibitory roles in recombination due to their deleterious actions on the RecF pathway. However, some results suggest that these enzymes could also have stimulatory roles in recombination reactions proceeding on the RecBCD pathway. Genetic experiments with UV-irradiated E. coli cells indicated that ExoI and SbcCD might be involved in blunting radiation-induced DNA ends prior to RecBC(D) action (38, 45, 46). Such a role of ExoI and SbcCD seems to be particularly critical in recD recF mutants, in which the majority of DSB repair depends on the RecBC enzyme (38). It was also suggested that the blunting roles of the two nucleases may be required during conjugational recombination (16, 46).In this work, we studied the effects of sbcB (xonA) and sbcD mutations on DNA degradation occurring spontaneously in exponentially growing recA mutant cells, as well as on DNA degradation induced in recA mutants by UV irradiation. We have demonstrated that in both cases DNA degradation is strongly reduced in recA mutants that carry in addition a combination of xonA and sbcD null mutations. The results described in this paper suggest that ExoI and SbcCD play partially redundant roles in regulating DNA degradation in recA cells.     

Cre-lox-Based Method for Generation of Large Deletions within the Genomic Magnetosome Island of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense

Magnetosome biomineralization and magnetotaxis in magnetotactic bacteria are controlled by numerous, mostly unknown gene functions that are predominantly encoded by several operons located within the genomic magnetosome island (MAI). Genetic analysis of magnetotactic bacteria has remained difficult and requires the development of novel tools. We established a Cre-lox-based deletion method which allows the excision of large genomic fragments in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Two conjugative suicide plasmids harboring lox sites that flanked the target region were subsequently inserted into the chromosome by homologous recombination, requiring only one single-crossover event, respectively, and resulting in a double cointegrate. Excision of the targeted chromosomal segment that included the inserted plasmids and their resistance markers was induced by trans expression of Cre recombinase, which leaves behind a scar of only a single loxP site. The Cre helper plasmid was then cured from the deletant strain by relief of antibiotic selection. We have used this method for the deletion of 16.3-kb, 61-kb, and 67.3-kb fragments from the genomic MAI, either in a single round or in subsequent rounds of deletion, covering a region of approximately 87 kb that comprises the mamAB, mms6, and mamGFDC operons. As expected, all mutants were Mag⁻ and some were Mot⁻; otherwise, they showed normal growth patterns, which indicates that the deleted region is not essential for viability in the laboratory. The method will facilitate future functional analysis of magnetosome genes and also can be utilized for large-scale genome engineering in magnetotactic bacteria.Magnetosomes are unique membrane-enveloped organelles that are formed by magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) for magnetic navigation (2, 37). The mechanism of magnetosome formation is within the focus of a multidisciplinary interest and has relevance for biotechnological applications (5). It has been recognized that the biomineralization of inorganic magnetite crystals and their assembly into highly ordered magnetosome chains are under strict genetic control. Recent studies combining proteomic and bioinformatic approaches suggested that the genetic determination of magnetosome formation is complex and may potentially involve 25 to 50 gene functions (15), with unknown numbers of accessory genes and those controlling signal transduction and motility to achieve effective magnetotaxis (8, 9, 12, 26, 27, 29). However, the functional characterization of these candidate genes has been lagging behind. This is due to technical difficulties and the lack of facile tools for genetic manipulation of MTB. Allelic replacement systems have been established for Magnetospirillum magneticum (18) and Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense (39, 40), but so far, there are only few examples of these for magnetosome genes that were functionally characterized because of the tedious and cumbersome procedures required for mutant generation (11, 19, 28, 31-32). Most genes controlling magnetosome formation in these and other MTB are located within a genomic magnetosome island (MAI) (34), which is genetically instable during stationary growth (47) and more or less conserved in other MTB (12, 13, 35). Most known magnetosome genes are organized within several conserved operons, which are interspersed with large, poorly conserved genome sections of unknown functions that have been speculated to represent genetic junk irrelevant for magnetotaxis but to cause genetic instability by their high content of repeats and transposable elements (34, 47). Thus, for large-scale functional genome analysis and rearrangements of the MAI, there is a great need for additional and more efficient genetic methods.Artificial genome recombination systems have been described for a number of bacteria. Many of them are based on the Cre-loxP system of the P1 phage (42). The Cre-loxP recombination system is a simple two-component system that is recognized as a powerful genetic tool in a multitude of eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms (4, 6, 48). The Cre protein belongs to the integrase family of site-specific recombinases and catalyzes reciprocal site-specific recombination of DNA at 34-bp loxP sites, resulting in either excision or inversion, depending on the parallel or antiparallel orientation of the loxP sites, respectively (21). It does not require any host cofactors or accessory proteins (7). Cre-lox deletion has several advantages over other methods, such as a high efficiency and the independency of the length of DNA located between the two lox sites. The utility of Cre-lox systems has been demonstrated in a wide variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (17, 22-23). In several studies, it was applied for the generation of large-scale deletions, as in for example, the Gram-positive Corynebacterium glutamicum (43-46) and Bacillus subtilis (49).In M. gryphiswaldense, the functionality of a Cre-loxP antibiotic marker recycling system (25) has been previously demonstrated by deletion of a single gene based on double-crossover insertion of two loxP sites, followed by subsequent Cre-mediated excision (31). In this study, we describe a novel strategy for Cre-loxP-mediated deletion of large genomic fragments which requires only two single crossovers. The system has been validated by the generation of three large deletions, two single and one combination within the MAI, which demonstrated that the total deleted region of approximately 87 kb is not essential for viability and growth in the laboratory.     

Allele-Specific H3K79 Di- versus Trimethylation Distinguishes Opposite Parental Alleles at Imprinted Regions

Imprinted gene expression corresponds to parental allele-specific DNA CpG methylation and chromatin composition. Histone tail covalent modifications have been extensively studied, but it is not known whether modifications in the histone globular domains can also discriminate between the parental alleles. Using multiplex chromatin immunoprecipitation-single nucleotide primer extension (ChIP-SNuPE) assays, we measured the allele-specific enrichment of H3K79 methylation and H4K91 acetylation along the H19/Igf2 imprinted domain. Whereas H3K79me1, H3K79me2, and H4K91ac displayed a paternal-specific enrichment at the paternally expressed Igf2 locus, H3K79me3 was paternally biased at the maternally expressed H19 locus, including the paternally methylated imprinting control region (ICR). We found that these allele-specific differences depended on CTCF binding in the maternal ICR allele. We analyzed an additional 11 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and found that, in general, H3K79me3 was associated with the CpG-methylated alleles, whereas H3K79me1, H3K79me2, and H4K91ac enrichment was specific to the unmethylated alleles. Our data suggest that allele-specific differences in the globular histone domains may constitute a layer of the “histone code” at imprinted genes.Imprinted genes are defined by the characteristic monoallelic silencing of either the paternally or maternally inherited allele. Most imprinted genes exist in imprinted gene clusters (10), and these clusters are usually associated with one or more differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (27, 65). DNA methylation at DMRs is essential for the allele-specific expression of most imprinted genes (31). Maternal or paternal allele-specific DNA methylation of a subset of DMRs (germ line DMRs) is gamete specific (27, 39). These maternal or paternal methylation differences are established during oogenesis or spermatogenesis, respectively, by the de novo DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b together with Dnmt3L (5, 26, 48). The gamete-specific methylation differences set the stage for the parental allele-specific action of germ line DMRs, some of which have been shown to control the monoallelic expression of the associated genes in the respective domains (11, 34, 36, 53, 66, 71-73, 77). These DMRs are called imprinting control regions (ICRs).Two recurring themes have been reported for ICR action. ICRs can function as DNA methylation-regulated promoters of a noncoding RNA or as methylation-regulated insulators. Recent evidence suggests that both of these mechanisms involve chromatin organization by either the noncoding RNA (45, 50) or the CTCF insulator protein (17, 32) along the respective imprinted domains. The CTCF insulator binds in the unmethylated maternal allele of the H19/Igf2 ICR and blocks the access of the Igf2 promoters to the shared downstream enhancers. CTCF cannot bind in the methylated paternal ICR allele; hence, here the Igf2 promoters have access to the enhancers (4, 18, 24, 25, 62). When CTCF binding is abolished in the ICR of the maternal allele, Igf2 expression becomes biallelic, and H19 expression is missing from both alleles (17, 52, 58, 63). Importantly, CTCF is the single major organizer of the allele-specific chromatin along the H19/Igf2 imprinted domain (17). Significantly, CTCF recruits, at a distance, Polycomb-mediated H3K27me3 repressive marks at the Igf2 promoter and at the Igf2 DMRs (17, 32).A role for chromatin composition is suggested in the parental allele-specific expression of imprinted genes. Repressive histone tail covalent modifications, such as H3K9me2 H3K9me3, H4K20me3, H3K27me3, and the symmetrically methylated H4R3me2 marks, are generally associated with the methylated DMR alleles, while activating histone tail covalent modifications, such as acetylated histone tails and also H3K4me2 and H3K4me3, are characteristic of the unmethylated alleles (7-9, 12-15, 17, 21, 33, 35, 43, 44, 51, 55, 56, 67, 69, 74, 75). Importantly, the maintenance of imprinted gene expression depends on the allele-specific chromatin differences. ICR-dependent H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 enrichment in the paternal allele (67) is required for paternal repression of a set of imprinted genes along the Kcnq1 imprinted domain in the placenta (30). Imprinted Cdkn1c and Cd81 expression depends on H3K27 methyltransferase Ezh2 activity in the extraembryonic ectoderm (64). Similarly, H3K9 methyltransferase Ehmt2 is required for parental allele-specific expression of a number of imprinted genes, including Osbpl5, Cd81, Ascl2, Tfpi2, and Slc22a3 in the placenta (44, 45, 70).There is increasing evidence that covalent modifications, not only in the histone tails but also in the histone globular domains, carry essential information for development and gene regulation. The H3K79 methyltransferase gene is essential for development in Drosophila (60) and in mice (22). H3K79 methylation is required for telomeric heterochromatin silencing in Drosophila (60), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (47, 68), and mice (22). The H4K91 residue regulates nucleosome assembly (76). Whereas mutations at single acetylation sites in the histone tails have only minor consequences, mutation of the H4K91 site in the histone H4 globular domain causes severe defects in silent chromatin formation and DNA repair in yeast (37, 42, 76).Contrary to the abundant information that exists regarding the allele-specific chromatin composition at DMRs of imprinted genes, no information is available about the parental allele-specific marking in the histone globular domains at the DMRs. We hypothesized that chromatin marks in the globular domains of histones also distinguish the parental alleles of germ line DMRs. In order to demonstrate this, we measured the allele-specific enrichment of H3K79me1, H3K79me2, H3K79me3, and H4K91ac at 11 mouse DMRs using quantitative multiplex chromatin immunoprecipitation-single nucleotide primer extension (ChIP-SNuPE) assays. In general, H3K79me3 was associated with the methylated allele at most DMRs, whereas the unmethylated allele showed enrichment for H3K79me1, H3K79me2, and H4K91ac. These results are consistent with the possibility that allele-specific differences in the globular domains of histones contribute to the “histone code” at DMRs.