Microhomology-mediated deletion and gene conversion in African trypanosomes

Antigenic variation in African trypanosomes is induced by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In these protozoan parasites, DSB repair (DSBR) is dominated by homologous recombination (HR) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), while non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) has not been reported. To facilitate the analysis of chromosomal end-joining, we established a system whereby inter-allelic repair by HR is lethal due to loss of an essential gene. Analysis of intrachromosomal end joining in individual DSBR survivors exclusively revealed MMEJ-based deletions but no NHEJ. A survey of microhomologies typically revealed sequences of between 5 and 20 bp in length with several mismatches tolerated in longer stretches. Mean deletions were of 54 bp on the side closest to the break and 284 bp in total. Break proximity, microhomology length and GC-content all favored repair and the pattern of MMEJ described above was similar at several different loci across the genome. We also identified interchromosomal gene conversion involving HR and MMEJ at different ends of a duplicated sequence. While MMEJ-based deletions were RAD51-independent, one-sided MMEJ was RAD51 dependent. Thus, we describe the features of MMEJ in Trypanosoma brucei, which is analogous to micro single-strand annealing; and RAD51 dependent, one-sided MMEJ. We discuss the contribution of MMEJ pathways to genome evolution, subtelomere recombination and antigenic variation.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2- and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomology-mediated end joining

Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) joins DNA ends via short stretches [5-20 nucleotides (nt)] of direct repeat sequences, yielding deletions of intervening sequences. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA) are other error prone processes that anneal single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) via a few bases (<5 nt) or extensive direct repeat homologies (>20 nt). Although the genetic components involved in MMEJ are largely unknown, those in NHEJ and SSA are characterized in some detail. Here, we surveyed the role of NHEJ or SSA factors in joining of double-strand breaks (DSBs) with no complementary DNA ends that rely primarily on MMEJ repair. We found that MMEJ requires the nuclease activity of Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2, 3' flap removal by Rad1/Rad10, Nej1, and DNA synthesis by multiple polymerases including Pol4, Rad30, Rev3, and Pol32. The mismatch repair proteins, Rad52 group genes, and Rad27 are dispensable for MMEJ. Sae2 and Tel1 promote MMEJ but inhibit NHEJ, likely by regulating Mre11-dependent ssDNA accumulation at DNA break. Our data support the role of Sae2 and Tel1 in MMEJ and genome integrity.     

Microhomology-mediated DNA strand annealing and elongation by human DNA polymerases λ and β on normal and repetitive DNA sequences

'Classical' non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), dependent on the Ku70/80 and the DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 complexes, is essential for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Eukaryotic cells possess also an alternative microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) mechanism, which is independent from Ku and DNA ligase 4/XRCC4. The components of the MMEJ machinery are still largely unknown. Family X DNA polymerases (pols) are involved in the classical NHEJ pathway. We have compared in this work, the ability of human family X DNA pols β, λ and μ, to promote the MMEJ of different model templates with terminal microhomology regions. Our results reveal that DNA pol λ and DNA ligase I are sufficient to promote efficient MMEJ repair of broken DNA ends in vitro, and this in the absence of auxiliary factors. However, DNA pol β, not λ, was more efficient in promoting MMEJ of DNA ends containing the (CAG)n triplet repeat sequence of the human Huntingtin gene, leading to triplet expansion. The checkpoint complex Rad9/Hus1/Rad1 promoted end joining by DNA pol λ on non-repetitive sequences, while it limited triplet expansion by DNA pol β. We propose a possible novel role of DNA pol β in MMEJ, promoting (CAG)n triplet repeats instability.     

Microhomology-mediated end joining is the principal mediator of double-strand break repair during mitochondrial DNA lesions

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions are associated with various mitochondrial disorders. The deletions identified in humans are flanked by short, directly repeated mitochondrial DNA sequences; however, the mechanism of such DNA rearrangements has yet to be elucidated. In contrast to nuclear DNA (nDNA), mtDNA is more exposed to oxidative damage, which may result in double-strand breaks (DSBs). Although DSB repair in nDNA is well studied, repair mechanisms in mitochondria are not characterized. In the present study, we investigate the mechanisms of DSB repair in mitochondria using in vitro and ex vivo assays. Whereas classical NHEJ (C-NHEJ) is undetectable, microhomology-mediated alternative NHEJ efficiently repairs DSBs in mitochondria. Of interest, robust microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) was observed with DNA substrates bearing 5-, 8-, 10-, 13-, 16-, 19-, and 22-nt microhomology. Furthermore, MMEJ efficiency was enhanced with an increase in the length of homology. Western blotting, immunoprecipitation, and protein inhibition assays suggest the involvement of CtIP, FEN1, MRE11, and PARP1 in mitochondrial MMEJ. Knockdown studies, in conjunction with other experiments, demonstrated that DNA ligase III, but not ligase IV or ligase I, is primarily responsible for the final sealing of DSBs during mitochondrial MMEJ. These observations highlight the central role of MMEJ in maintenance of mammalian mitochondrial genome integrity and is likely relevant for deletions observed in many human mitochondrial disorders.     

Involvement of Ku80 in microhomology-mediated end joining for DNA double-strand breaks in vivo

Mammalian cells have an activity of mutagenic repair for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), in which DNA ends are joined via microhomologous sequences flanking the breakpoint. MMEJ has been indicated to be undertaken without Ku proteins, which are essential factors for non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). On the other hand, recent studies with cell-free (in vitro) systems indicated the involvement of Ku proteins in MMEJ, suggesting that MMEJ could be also undertaken by a Ku-dependent pathway. To clarify whether Ku proteins are essential in MMEJ in vivo, linearized plasmid DNAs with microhomologous sequences of 10bp at both ends were introduced as repair substrates into Ku80-proficient and Ku80-deficient CHO cells, and were subjected to MMEJ and NHEJ. Activities of MMEJ and NHEJ, respectively, of the cells were evaluated by mathematical modeling for the increase in fluorescence of GFP proteins produced from repaired products. The Ku80 deficiency caused approximately 75% reduction of the MMEJ activity in CHO cells, while it caused is > or =90% reduction of the NHEJ activity. Therefore, it was indicated that there is a Ku-dependent pathway for MMEJ; however, MMEJ is less dependent on Ku80 protein than NHEJ. The fraction of MMEJ products increased in proportion to the increase in the amounts of substrates. The results suggest that the increase in DSBs makes the cell more predominant for MMEJ. MMEJ might function as a salvage pathway for DSBs that cannot be repaired by NHEJ.     

Non-homologous DNA end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSB) are the most serious form of DNA damage. Repair of DSBs is important to prevent chromosomal fragmentation, translocations and deletions. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of three major pathways for the repair of DSBs in human cells. In this process two DNA ends are joined directly, usually with no sequence homology, although in the case of same polarity of the single stranded overhangs in DSBs, regions of microhomology are utilized. NHEJ is typically imprecise, a characteristic that is useful for immune diversification in lymphocytes in V(D)J recombination. The main components of the NHEJ system in eukaryotes are the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), Ku proteins, XRCC4, DNA ligase IV, and Artemis. This review focuses on the mechanisms an dregulation of DSB repair by NHEJ in mammalian cells.     

Lack of MSH2 involvement differentiates V(D)J recombination from other non-homologous end joining events

V(D)J recombination and class switch recombination are the two DNA rearrangement events used to diversify the mouse and human antibody repertoires. While their double strand breaks (DSBs) are initiated by different mechanisms, both processes use non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in the repair phase. DNA mismatch repair elements (MSH2/MSH6) have been implicated in the repair of class switch junctions as well as other DNA DSBs that proceed through NHEJ. MSH2 has also been implicated in the regulation of factors such as ATM and the MRN (Mre11, Rad50, Nbs1) complex, which are involved in V(D)J recombination. These findings led us to examine the role of MSH2 in V(D)J repair. Using MSH2-/- and MSH2+/+ mice and cell lines, we show here that all pathways involving MSH2 are dispensable for the generation of an intact pre-immune repertoire by V(D)J recombination. In contrast to switch junctions and other DSBs, the usage of terminal homology in V(D)J junctions is not influenced by MSH2. Thus, whether the repair complex for V(D)J recombination is of a canonical NHEJ type or a separate microhomology-mediated-end joining (MMEJ) type, it does not involve MSH2. This highlights a distinction between the repair of V(D)J recombination and other NHEJ reactions.     

Homology and enzymatic requirements of microhomology-dependent alternative end joining

Nonhomologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) is one of the major double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways in higher eukaryotes. Recently, it has been shown that alternative NHEJ (A-NHEJ) occurs in the absence of classical NHEJ and is implicated in chromosomal translocations leading to cancer. In the present study, we have developed a novel biochemical assay system utilizing DSBs flanked by varying lengths of microhomology to study microhomology-mediated alternative end joining (MMEJ). We show that MMEJ can operate in normal cells, when microhomology is present, irrespective of occurrence of robust classical NHEJ. Length of the microhomology determines the efficiency of MMEJ, 5 nt being obligatory. Using this biochemical approach, we show that products obtained are due to MMEJ, which is dependent on MRE11, NBS1, LIGASE III, XRCC1, FEN1 and PARP1. Thus, we define the enzymatic machinery and microhomology requirements of alternative NHEJ using a well-defined biochemical system.DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious to the genome among various lesions. Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of the major DSB repair pathways in higher eukaryotes.^{1, 2, 3} In the absence of key NHEJ factors, another distinct but error-prone pathway known as alternative NHEJ (A-NHEJ) has been described to have an important role in DSB repair.^{4, 5, 6, 7} It has been shown that majority of A-NHEJ-mediated repair of DSBs utilize distinct microhomology regions, hence termed microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ).^{4, 8, 9}A-NHEJ has been proposed as a possible cause for chromosomal translocations. Studies have shown co-amplification of c-MYC and IgH locus from pro-B lymphomas in mice deficient for p53 and NHEJ.¹⁰ A reduced level of class switch recombination (CSR) and increased number of chromosomal rearrangements at IgH locus have been shown in XRCC4- and LIGASE IV-deficient murine B cells.⁸ The occurrence of robust alternative end joining has been reported in the absence of NHEJ proteins, when murine RAG proteins were absent.¹¹Unraveling the enzymatic machinery involved in alternative end joining is currently an active area of research. Recently, it was shown that MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex may be involved in a subset of alternative NHEJ,^{5, 12, 13, 14} whereas ATM has a regulatory role.¹⁵ Role of PARP1 in repairing switch regions through a microhomology-mediated pathway leading to IgH/c-MYC translocations during immunoglobulin CSR has been described.¹⁶ Besides, studies have also suggested a role for DNA LIGASE IIIα and WRN in A-NHEJ.¹⁷ Interestingly, XRCC1 was shown to be dispensable in A-NHEJ during CSR, whereas functional relevance of Ligase I, III and Pol λ have been established.^{18, 19, 20} Hence, it can be concluded that canonical NHEJ (C-NHEJ) requires LIGASE IV–XRCC4 complex, while A-NHEJ is predominant in the absence of C-NHEJ proteins and is mainly characterized by joining utilizing microhomology (MMEJ). Further, it has been demonstrated that RPA, when bound to single-stranded DNA can antagonize MMEJ.²¹ Very recently, a genetic system was reported in budding yeast to detect microhomology-mediated repair.²² However, little is known whether alternative NHEJ can be operative when classical NHEJ machinery is intact.²³ A recent study suggested that MMEJ is also functional in normal mammalian cells. Besides, HR and MMEJ share the initial steps of end resection for DSB repair in mammalian cells.²⁴ However, it appears that there is not much consensus among different research groups over its presence and relevance in normal cells.²³ Therefore, several aspects of alternative NHEJ still need to be resolved. For example, its precise mechanism and microhomology length requirements are yet to be fully uncovered. Its occurrence in normal cells needs to be proved beyond doubt. Although there are independent studies showing the role of multiple proteins using gene knockdown or knockout strategies, their involvement needs to be confirmed.In the present study, we have established a cell-free repair assay system using which we show that MMEJ is operative even in the presence of classical NHEJ machinery. Further, our data suggest that MMEJ operates not only in cancer cells but also in normal cells. We show that a minimum of 5 nt microhomology is required for MMEJ and is independent of classical NHEJ proteins such as KU70, KU80 and LIGASE IV. Finally, we show that MRN complex, XRCC1, FEN1, PARP1 and LIGASE III are the factors responsible for joining mediated through microhomology.     

Distinct mechanisms of nonhomologous end joining in the repair of site-directed chromosomal breaks with noncomplementary and complementary ends

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered the most important type of DNA damage inflicted by ionizing radiation. The molecular mechanisms of DSB repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) have not been well studied in live mammalian cells, due in part to the lack of suitable chromosomal repair assays. We previously introduced a novel plasmid-based assay to monitor NHEJ of site-directed chromosomal I-SceI breaks. In the current study, we expanded the analysis of chromosomal NHEJ products in murine fibroblasts to focus on the error-prone rejoining of DSBs with noncomplementary ends, which may serve as a model for radiation damage repair. We found that noncomplementary ends were efficiently repaired using microhomologies of 1-2 nucleotides (nt) present in the single-stranded overhangs, thereby keeping repair-associated end degradation to a minimum (2-3 nt). Microhomology-mediated end joining was disrupted by Wortmannin, a known inhibitor of DNA-PKcs. However, Wortmannin did not significantly impair the proficiency of end joining. In contrast to noncomplementary ends, the rejoining of cohesive ends showed only a minor dependence on microhomologies but produced fivefold larger deletions than the repair of noncomplementary ends. Together, these data suggest the presence of several distinct NHEJ mechanisms in live cells, which are characterized by the degree of sequence deletion and microhomology use. Our NHEJ assay should prove a useful system to further elucidate the genetic determinants and molecular mechanisms of site-directed DSBs in living cells.     

Time-dependent predominance of nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathways during embryonic development in mice

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is crucial for maintaining genomic integrity during the successful development of a fertilized egg into a whole organism. To date, the mechanism of DSB repair in postimplantation embryos has been largely unknown. In the present study, using a cell-free repair system derived from the different embryonic stages of mice, we find that canonical nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), one of the major DSB repair pathways in mammals, is predominant at 14.5 day of embryonic development. Interestingly, all four types of DSBs tested were repaired by ligase IV/XRCC4 and Ku-dependent classical NHEJ. Characterization of end-joined junctions and expression studies further showed evidences for canonical NHEJ. Strikingly, in contrast to the above, we observed noncanonical end joining accompanied by DSB resection, dependent on microhomology and ligase III in 18.5-day embryos. Interestingly, we observed an elevated expression of CtIP, MRE11, and NBS1 at this stage, suggesting that it could act as a switch between classical end joining and microhomology-mediated end joining at later stages of embryonic development. Thus, our results establish for the first time the existence of both canonical and alternative NHEJ pathways during the postimplantation stages of mammalian embryonic development.     

The Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex and non-homologous end-joining of incompatible ends in S. cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 (MRX) complex plays important roles in both homologous and non-homologous pathways of DNA repair. In this study, we investigated the role of the MRX complex and its enzymatic functions in non-homologous repair of DNA ends containing incompatible end structures. Using a plasmid transformation assay, we found that mre11 and rad50 null strains are extremely deficient in joining of incompatible DNA ends. Expression of the nuclease-deficient Mre11 mutant H125N fully complemented the mre11 strain for joining of mismatched ends in the absence of homology, while a mutant of Rad50 deficient in ATP-dependent activities exhibited levels of end-joining similar to a rad50 deletion strain. Although the majority of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) products isolated did not contain microhomologies, introduction of an 8bp microhomology at mismatched ends resulted in microhomology-mediated joining in all of the products recovered, demonstrating that a microhomology exerts a dominant effect on processing events that occur during NHEJ. Nuclease-deficient Mre11p was less efficient in promoting microhomology-mediated end-joining in comparison to its ability to stimulate non-microhomology-mediated events, suggesting that Mre11p influences, but is not essential for, microhomology-mediated repair. When the linearized DNA was transformed in the presence of an intact homologous plasmid to facilitate gap repair, there was no decrease in NHEJ products obtained, suggesting that NHEJ and homologous repair do not compete for DNA ends in vivo. These results suggest that the MRX complex is essential for joining of incompatible ends by NHEJ, and the ATP-dependent activities of Rad50 are critical for this process.     

Non-homologous DNA end joining

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a serious threat for the cell and when not repaired or misrepaired can result in mutations or chromosome rearrangements and eventually in cell death. Therefore, cells have evolved a number of pathways to deal with DSB including homologous recombination (HR), single-strand annealing (SSA) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). In mammals DSBs are primarily repaired by NHEJ and HR, while HR repair dominates in yeast, but this depends also on the phase of the cell cycle. NHEJ functions in all kinds of cells, from bacteria to man, and depends on the structure of DSB termini. In this process two DNA ends are joined directly, usually with no sequence homology, although in the case of same polarity of the single stranded overhangs in DSBs, regions of microhomology are utilized. The usage of microhomology is common in DNA end-joining of physiological DSBs, such as at the coding ends in V(D)J (variable(diversity) joining) recombination. The main components of the NHEJ system in eukaryotes are the catalytic subunit of DNA protein kinase (DNA-PK(cs)), which is recruited by DNA Ku protein, a heterodimer of Ku70 and Ku80, as well as XRCC4 protein and DNA ligase IV. A complex of Rad50/Mre11/Xrs2, a family of Sir proteins and probably other yet unidentified proteins can be also involved in this process. NHEJ and HR may play overlapping roles in the repair of DSBs produced in the S phase of the cell cycle or at replication forks. Aside from DNA repair, NHEJ may play a role in many different processes, including the maintenance of telomeres and integration of HIV-1 genome into a host genome, as well as the insertion of pseudogenes and repetitive sequences into the genome of mammalian cells. Inhibition of NHEJ can be exploited in cancer therapy in radio-sensitizing cancer cells. Identification of all key players and fundamental mechanisms underlying NHEJ still requires further research.     

Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences

End joining of double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires Ku proteins and frequently involves base pairing between complementary terminal sequences. To define the role of terminal base pairing in end joining, two oppositely oriented HO endonuclease cleavage sites separated by 2.0 kb were integrated into yeast chromosome III, where constitutive expression of HO endonuclease creates two simultaneous DSBs with no complementary end sequence. Lack of complementary sequence in their 3' single-strand overhangs facilitates efficient repair events distinctly different from when the 3' ends have a 4-bp sequence base paired in various ways to create 2- to 3-bp insertions. Repair of noncomplementary ends results in a set of nonrandom deletions of up to 302 bp, annealed by imperfect microhomology of about 8 to 10 bp at the junctions. This microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) is Ku independent, but strongly dependent on Mre11, Rad50, and Rad1 proteins and partially dependent on Dnl4 protein. The MMEJ also occurs when Rad52 is absent, but the extent of deletions becomes more limited. The increased gamma ray sensitivity of rad1Delta rad52Delta yku70Delta strains compared to rad52Delta yku70Delta strains suggests that MMEJ also contributes to the repair of DSBs induced by ionizing radiation.     

Repair of a minimal DNA double-strand break by NHEJ requires DNA-PKcs and is controlled by the ATM/ATR checkpoint

Mammalian cells primarily rejoin DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway. The joining of the broken DNA ends appears directly without template and accuracy is ensured by the NHEJ factors that are under ATM/ATR regulated checkpoint control. In the current study we report the engineering of a mono-specific DNA damaging agent. This was used to study the molecular requirements for the repair of the least complex DSB in vivo. Single-chain PvuII restriction enzymes fused to protein delivery sequences transduce cells efficiently and induce blunt end DSBs in vivo. We demonstrate that beside XRCC4/LigaseIV and KU, the DNA-PK catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) is also essential for the joining of this low complex DSB in vivo. The appearance of blunt end 3′-hydroxyl and 5′-phosphate DNA DSBs induces a significantly higher frequency of anaphase bridges in cells that do not contain functional DNA-PKcs, suggesting an absolute requirement for DNA-PKcs in the control of chromosomal stability during end joining. Moreover, these minimal blunt end DSBs are sufficient to induce a p53 and ATM/ATR checkpoint function.     

Electron microscopy visualization of DNA-protein complexes formed by Ku and DNA ligase IV

The repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) is essential for cell viability and genome stability. Aberrant repair of DSBs has been linked with cancer predisposition and aging. During the repair of DSBs by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), DNA ends are brought together, processed and then joined. In eukaryotes, this repair pathway is initiated by the binding of the ring-shaped Ku heterodimer and completed by DNA ligase IV. The DNA ligase IV complex, DNA ligase IV/XRRC4 in humans and Dnl4/Lif1 in yeast, is recruited to DNA ends in vitro and in vivo by an interaction with Ku and, in yeast, Dnl4/Lif1 stabilizes the binding of yKu to in vivo DSBs. Here we have analyzed the interactions of these functionally conserved eukaryotic NHEJ factors with DNA by electron microscopy. As expected, the ring-shaped Ku complex bound stably and specifically to DNA ends at physiological salt concentrations. At a ratio of 1 Ku molecule per DNA end, the majority of DNA ends were occupied by a single Ku complex with no significant formation of linear DNA multimers or circular loops. Both Dnl4/Lif1 and DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 formed complexes with Ku-bound DNA ends, resulting in intra- and intermolecular DNA end bridging, even with non-ligatable DNA ends. Together, these studies, which provide the first visualization of the conserved complex formed by Ku and DNA ligase IV at juxtaposed DNA ends by electron microscopy, suggest that the DNA ligase IV complex mediates end-bridging by engaging two Ku-bound DNA ends.     

Rapid repair of DNA double strand breaks in Arabidopsis thaliana is dependent on proteins involved in chromosome structure maintenance

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most cytotoxic forms of DNA damage and must be repaired by recombination, predominantly via non-homologous joining of DNA ends (NHEJ) in higher eukaryotes. However, analysis of DSB repair kinetics of plant NHEJ mutants atlig4-4 and atku80 with the neutral comet assay shows that alternative DSB repair pathways are active. Surprisingly, these kinetic measurements show that DSB repair was faster in the NHEJ mutant lines than in wild-type Arabidopsis.Here we provide the first characterization of this KU-independent, rapid DSB repair pathway operating in Arabidopsis. The alternate pathway that rapidly removes the majority of DSBs present in nuclear DNA depends upon structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex proteins, namely MIM/AtRAD18 and AtRAD21.1. An absolute requirement for SMC proteins and kleisin for rapid repair of DSBs in Arabidopsis opens new insight into the mechanism of DSB removal in plants.     

Repair of double-strand breaks by nonhomologous end joining in the absence of Mre11

Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex involvement in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) is controversial. The MRN complex is required for NHEJ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In vertebrates, Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 are essential genes, and studies have been limited to cells carrying hypomorphic mutations in Mre11 or Nbs1, which still perform several MRN complex-associated activities. In this study, we analyze the effects of Mre11 loss on the mechanism of vertebrate NHEJ by using a chromatinized plasmid double-strand break (DSB) repair assay in cell-free extracts from Xenopus laevis. Mre11-depleted extracts are able to support efficient NHEJ repair of DSBs regardless of the end structure. Mre11 depletion does not alter the kinetics of end joining or the type and frequency of junctions found in repaired products. Finally, Ku70-independent end-joining events are not affected by Mre11 loss. Our data demonstrate that the MRN complex is not required for efficient and accurate NHEJ-mediated repair of DSBs in this vertebrate system.     

Synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining accounts for multiple types of repair junctions

Ku or DNA ligase 4-independent alternative end joining (alt-EJ) repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) frequently correlates with increased junctional microhomology. However, alt-EJ also produces junctions without microhomology (apparent blunt joins), and the exact role of microhomology in both alt-EJ and classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) remains unclear. To better understand the degree to which alt-EJ depends on annealing at pre-existing microhomologies, we examined inaccurate repair of an I-SceI DSB lacking nearby microhomologies of greater than four nucleotides in Drosophila. Lig4 deficiency affected neither frequency nor length of junctional microhomology, but significantly increased insertion frequency. Many insertions appeared to be templated. Based on sequence analysis of repair junctions, we propose a model of synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining (SD-MMEJ), in which de novo synthesis by an accurate non-processive DNA polymerase creates microhomology. Repair junctions with apparent blunt joins, junctional microhomologies and short indels (deletion with insertion) are often considered to reflect different repair mechanisms. However, a majority of each type had structures consistent with the predictions of our SD-MMEJ model. This suggests that a single underlying mechanism could be responsible for all three repair product types. Genetic analysis indicates that SD-MMEJ is Ku70, Lig4 and Rad51-independent but impaired in mus308 (POLQ) mutants.     

ATM regulates Mre11-dependent DNA end-degradation and microhomology-mediated end joining

The human disorder ataxia telangiectasia (AT), which is characterized by genetic instability and neurodegeneration, results from mutation of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase. The loss of ATM leads to cell cycle checkpoint deficiencies and other DNA damage signaling defects that do not fully explain all pathologies associated with A-T including neuronal loss. In addressing this enigma, we find here that ATM suppresses DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ). We show that ATM repression of DNA end-degradation is dependent on its kinase activities and that Mre11 is the major nuclease behind increased DNA end-degradation and MMEJ repair in A-T. Assessment of MMEJ by an in vivo reporter assay system reveals decreased levels of MMEJ repair in Mre11-knockdown cells and in cells treated with Mre11-nuclease inhibitor mirin. Structure-based modeling of Mre11 dimer engaging DNA ends suggests the 5′ ends of a bridged DSB are juxtaposed such that DNA unwinding and 3′–5′ exonuclease activities may collaborate to facilitate simultaneous pairing of extended 5′ termini and exonucleolytic degradation of the 3′ ends in MMEJ. Together our results provide an integrated understanding of ATM and Mre11 in MMEJ: ATM has a critical regulatory function in controlling DNA end-stability and error-prone DSB repair and Mre11 nuclease plays a major role in initiating MMEJ in mammalian cells. These functions of ATM and Mre11 could be particularly important in neuronal cells, which are post-mitotic and therefore depend on mechanisms other than homologous recombination between sister chromatids to repair DSBs.Key words: ATM, Mre11, MRN complex, DNA degradation, double-strand break repair, microhomology-mediated end joining, PI-3-kinase-like kinases     

Ku counteracts mobilization of PARP1 and MRN in chromatin damaged with DNA double-strand breaks

In mammalian cells, the main pathway for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) repair is classical non-homologous end joining (C-NHEJ). An alternative or back-up NHEJ (B-NHEJ) pathway has emerged which operates preferentially under C-NHEJ defective conditions. Although B-NHEJ appears particularly relevant to genomic instability associated with cancer, its components and regulation are still largely unknown. To get insights into this pathway, we have knocked-down Ku, the main contributor to C-NHEJ. Thus, models of human cell lines have been engineered in which the expression of Ku70/80 heterodimer can be significantly lowered by the conditional induction of a shRNA against Ku70. On Ku reduction in cells, resulting NHEJ competent protein extracts showed a shift from C- to B-NHEJ that could be reversed by addition of purified Ku protein. Using a cellular fractionation protocol after treatment with a strong DSBs inducer followed by western blotting or immunostaining, we established that, among C-NHEJ factors, Ku is the main counteracting factor against mobilization of PARP1 and the MRN complex to damaged chromatin. In addition, Ku limits PAR synthesis and single-stranded DNA production in response to DSBs. These data support the involvement of PARP1 and the MRN proteins in the B-NHEJ route for the repair of DNA DSBs.