首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Riboflavin significantly enhanced the efficacy of simulated solar disinfection (SODIS) at 150 watts per square meter (W m−2) against a variety of microorganisms, including Escherichia coli, Fusarium solani, Candida albicans, and Acanthamoeba polyphaga trophozoites (>3 to 4 log10 after 2 to 6 h; P < 0.001). With A. polyphaga cysts, the kill (3.5 log10 after 6 h) was obtained only in the presence of riboflavin and 250 W m−2 irradiance.Solar disinfection (SODIS) is an established and proven technique for the generation of safer drinking water (11). Water is collected into transparent plastic polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles and placed in direct sunlight for 6 to 8 h prior to consumption (14). The application of SODIS has been shown to be a simple and cost-effective method for reducing the incidence of gastrointestinal infection in communities where potable water is not available (2-4). Under laboratory conditions using simulated sunlight, SODIS has been shown to inactivate pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa (6, 12, 15). Although SODIS is not fully understood, it is believed to achieve microbial killing through a combination of DNA-damaging effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation and thermal inactivation from solar heating (21).The combination of UVA radiation and riboflavin (vitamin B2) has recently been reported to have therapeutic application in the treatment of bacterial and fungal ocular pathogens (13, 17) and has also been proposed as a method for decontaminating donor blood products prior to transfusion (1). In the present study, we report that the addition of riboflavin significantly enhances the disinfectant efficacy of simulated SODIS against bacterial, fungal, and protozoan pathogens.Chemicals and media were obtained from Sigma (Dorset, United Kingdom), Oxoid (Basingstoke, United Kingdom), and BD (Oxford, United Kingdom). Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 9027), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), Candida albicans (ATCC 10231), and Fusarium solani (ATCC 36031) were obtained from ATCC (through LGC Standards, United Kingdom). Escherichia coli (JM101) was obtained in house, and the Legionella pneumophila strain used was a recent environmental isolate.B. subtilis spores were produced from culture on a previously published defined sporulation medium (19). L. pneumophila was grown on buffered charcoal-yeast extract agar (5). All other bacteria were cultured on tryptone soy agar, and C. albicans was cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar as described previously (9). Fusarium solani was cultured on potato dextrose agar, and conidia were prepared as reported previously (7). Acanthamoeba polyphaga (Ros) was isolated from an unpublished keratitis case at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom, in 1991. Trophozoites were maintained and cysts prepared as described previously (8, 18).Assays were conducted in transparent 12-well tissue culture microtiter plates with UV-transparent lids (Helena Biosciences, United Kingdom). Test organisms (1 × 106/ml) were suspended in 3 ml of one-quarter-strength Ringer''s solution or natural freshwater (as pretreated water from a reservoir in United Kingdom) with or without riboflavin (250 μM). The plates were exposed to simulated sunlight at an optical output irradiance of 150 watts per square meter (W m−2) delivered from an HPR125 W quartz mercury arc lamp (Philips, Guildford, United Kingdom). Optical irradiances were measured using a calibrated broadband optical power meter (Melles Griot, Netherlands). Test plates were maintained at 30°C by partial submersion in a water bath.At timed intervals for bacteria and fungi, the aliquots were plated out by using a WASP spiral plater and colonies subsequently counted by using a ProtoCOL automated colony counter (Don Whitley, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom). Acanthamoeba trophozoite and cyst viabilities were determined as described previously (6). Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of data from triplicate experiments via the InStat statistical software package (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA).The efficacies of simulated sunlight at an optical output irradiance of 150 W m−2 alone (SODIS) and in the presence of 250 μM riboflavin (SODIS-R) against the test organisms are shown in Table Table1.1. With the exception of B. subtilis spores and A. polyphaga cysts, SODIS-R resulted in a significant increase in microbial killing compared to SODIS alone (P < 0.001). In most instances, SODIS-R achieved total inactivation by 2 h, compared to 6 h for SODIS alone (Table (Table1).1). For F. solani, C. albicans, ands A. polyphaga trophozoites, only SODIS-R achieved a complete organism kill after 4 to 6 h (P < 0.001). All control experiments in which the experiments were protected from the light source showed no reduction in organism viability over the time course (results not shown).

TABLE 1.

Efficacies of simulated SODIS for 6 h alone and with 250 μM riboflavin (SODIS-R)
OrganismConditionaLog10 reduction in viability at indicated h of exposureb
1246
E. coliSODIS0.0 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.15.7 ± 0.05.7 ± 0.0
SODIS-R1.1 ± 0.05.7 ± 0.05.7 ± 0.05.7 ± 0.0
L. pneumophilaSODIS0.7 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.34.8 ± 0.24.8 ± 0.2
SODIS-R4.4 ± 0.04.4 ± 0.04.4 ± 0.04.4 ± 0.0
P. aeruginosaSODIS0.7 ± 0.01.8 ± 0.04.9 ± 0.04.9 ± 0.0
SODIS-R5.0 ± 0.05.0 ± 0.05.0 ± 0.05.0 ± 0.0
S. aureusSODIS0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.06.2 ± 0.06.2 ± 0.0
SODIS-R0.2 ± 0.16.3 ± 0.06.3 ± 0.06.3 ± 0.0
C. albicansSODIS0.2 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.1
SODIS-R0.1 ± 0.00.7 ± 0.15.3 ± 0.05.3 ± 0.0
F. solani conidiaSODIS0.2 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.00.7 ± 0.1
SODIS-R0.3 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.14.4 ± 0.0
B. subtilis sporesSODIS0.3 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.0
SODIS-R0.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.10.3 ± 0.30.1 ± 0.0
SODIS (250 W m−2)0.1 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.0 ± 0.0
SODIS-R (250 W m−2)0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.2 ± 0.00.4 ± 0.0
SODIS (320 W m−2)0.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.14.3 ± 0.0
SODIS-R (320 W m−2)0.1 ± 0.00.1 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.04.3 ± 0.0
A. polyphaga trophozoitesSODIS0.4 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.1
SODIS-R0.3 ± 0.11.3 ± 0.12.3 ± 0.43.1 ± 0.2
SODIS, naturalc0.3 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.2
SODIS-R, naturalc0.2 ± 0.11.0 ± 0.22.2 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.3
A. polyphaga cystsSODIS0.4 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.10.4 ± 0.2
SODIS-R0.4 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.20.5 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.3
SODIS (250 W m−2)0.0 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.30.2 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.2
SODIS-R (250 W m−2)0.4 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.13.5 ± 0.3
SODIS (250 W m−2), naturalc0.0 ± 0.30.2 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.1
SODIS-R (250 W m−2), naturalc0.1 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.13.4 ± 0.2
Open in a separate windowaConditions are at an intensity of 150 W m−2 unless otherwise indicated.bThe values reported are means ± standard errors of the means from triplicate experiments.cAdditional experiments for this condition were performed using natural freshwater.The highly resistant A. polyphaga cysts and B. subtilis spores were unaffected by SODIS or SODIS-R at an optical irradiance of 150 W m−2. However, a significant reduction in cyst viability was observed at 6 h when the optical irradiance was increased to 250 W m−2 for SODIS-R only (P < 0.001; Table Table1).1). For spores, a kill was obtained only at 320 W m−2 after 6-h exposure, and no difference between SODIS and SODIS-R was observed (Table (Table1).1). Previously, we reported a >2-log kill at 6 h for Acanthamoeba cysts by using SODIS at the higher optical irradiance of 850 W m−2, compared to the 0.1-log10 kill observed here using the lower intensity of 250 W m−2 or the 3.5-log10 kill with SODIS-R.Inactivation experiments performed with Acanthamoeba cysts and trophozoites suspended in natural freshwater gave results comparable to those obtained with Ringer''s solution (P > 0.05; Table Table1).1). However, it is acknowledged that the findings of this study are based on laboratory-grade water and freshwater and that differences in water quality through changes in turbidity, pH, and mineral composition may significantly affect the performance of SODIS (20). Accordingly, further studies are indicated to evaluate the enhanced efficacy of SODIS-R by using natural waters of varying composition in the areas where SODIS is to be employed.Previous studies with SODIS under laboratory conditions have employed lamps delivering an optical irradiance of 850 W m−2 to reflect typical natural sunlight conditions (6, 11, 12, 15, 16). Here, we used an optical irradiance of 150 to 320 W m−2 to obtain slower organism inactivation and, hence, determine the potential enhancing effect of riboflavin on SODIS.In conclusion, this study has shown that the addition of riboflavin significantly enhances the efficacy of simulated SODIS against a range of microorganisms. The precise mechanism by which photoactivated riboflavin enhances antimicrobial activity is unknown, but studies have indicated that the process may be due, in part, to the generation of singlet oxygen, H2O2, superoxide, and hydroxyl free radicals (10). Further studies are warranted to assess the potential benefits from riboflavin-enhanced SODIS in reducing the incidence of gastrointestinal infection in communities where potable water is not available.  相似文献   

6.
GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCYH-I) is an essential Zn2+-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the first step of the de novo folate biosynthetic pathway in bacteria and plants, the 7-deazapurine biosynthetic pathway in Bacteria and Archaea, and the biopterin pathway in mammals. We recently reported the discovery of a new prokaryotic-specific GCYH-I (GCYH-IB) that displays no sequence identity to the canonical enzyme and is present in ∼25% of bacteria, the majority of which lack the canonical GCYH-I (renamed GCYH-IA). Genomic and genetic analyses indicate that in those organisms possessing both enzymes, e.g., Bacillus subtilis, GCYH-IA and -IB are functionally redundant, but differentially expressed. Whereas GCYH-IA is constitutively expressed, GCYH-IB is expressed only under Zn2+-limiting conditions. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that GCYH-IB functions to allow folate biosynthesis during Zn2+ starvation. Here, we present biochemical and structural data showing that bacterial GCYH-IB, like GCYH-IA, belongs to the tunneling-fold (T-fold) superfamily. However, the GCYH-IA and -IB enzymes exhibit significant differences in global structure and active-site architecture. While GCYH-IA is a unimodular, homodecameric, Zn2+-dependent enzyme, GCYH-IB is a bimodular, homotetrameric enzyme activated by a variety of divalent cations. The structure of GCYH-IB and the broad metal dependence exhibited by this enzyme further underscore the mechanistic plasticity that is emerging for the T-fold superfamily. Notably, while humans possess the canonical GCYH-IA enzyme, many clinically important human pathogens possess only the GCYH-IB enzyme, suggesting that this enzyme is a potential new molecular target for antibacterial development.The Zn2+-dependent enzyme GTP cyclohydrolase I (GCYH-I; EC 3.5.4.16) is the first enzyme of the de novo tetrahydrofolate (THF) biosynthesis pathway (Fig. (Fig.1)1) (38). THF is an essential cofactor in one-carbon transfer reactions in the synthesis of purines, thymidylate, pantothenate, glycine, serine, and methionine in all kingdoms of life (38), and formylmethionyl-tRNA in bacteria (7). Recently, it has also been shown that GCYH-I is required for the biosynthesis of the 7-deazaguanosine-modified tRNA nucleosides queuosine and archaeosine produced in Bacteria and Archaea (44), respectively, as well as the 7-deazaadenosine metabolites produced in some Streptomyces species (33). GCYH-I is encoded in Escherichia coli by the folE gene (28) and catalyzes the conversion of GTP to 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate (55), a complex reaction that begins with hydrolytic opening of the purine ring at C-8 of GTP to generate an N-formyl intermediate, followed by deformylation and subsequent rearrangement and cyclization of the ribosyl moiety to generate the pterin ring in THF (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Notably, the enzyme is dependent on an essential active-site Zn2+ that serves to activate a water molecule for nucleophilic attack at C-8 in the first step of the reaction (2).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Reaction catalyzed by GCYH-I, and metabolic fate of 7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate.A homologous GCYH-I is found in mammals and other higher eukaryotes, where it catalyzes the first step of the biopterin (BH4) pathway (Fig. (Fig.1),1), an essential cofactor in the biosynthesis of tyrosine and neurotransmitters, such as serotonin and l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (3, 52). Recently, a distinct class of GCYH-I enzymes, GCYH-IB (encoded by the folE2 gene), was discovered in microbes (26% of sequenced Bacteria and most Archaea) (12), including several clinically important human pathogens, e.g., Neisseria and Staphylococcus species. Notably, GCYH-IB is absent in eukaryotes.The distribution of folE (gene product renamed GCYH-IA) and folE2 (GCYH-IB) in bacteria is diverse (12). The majority of organisms possess either a folE (65%; e.g., Escherichia coli) or a folE2 (14%; e.g., Neisseria gonorrhoeae) gene. A significant number (12%; e.g., B. subtilis) possess both genes (a subset of 50 bacterial species is shown in Table Table1),1), and 9% lack both genes, although members of the latter group are mainly intracellular or symbiotic bacteria that rely on external sources of folate. The majority of Archaea possess only a folE2 gene, and the encoded GCYH-IB appears to be necessary only for the biosynthesis of the modified tRNA nucleoside archaeosine (44) except in the few halophilic Archaea that are known to synthesize folates, such as Haloferax volcanii, where GCYH-IB is involved in both archaeosine and folate formation (13, 44).

TABLE 1.

Distribution and candidate Zur-dependent regulation of alternative GCYH-I genes in bacteriaa
OrganismcPresence of:
folEfolE2
Enterobacteria
    Escherichia coli+
    Salmonella typhimurium+
    Yersinia pestis+
    Klebsiella pneumoniaeb++a
    Serratia marcescens++a
    Erwinia carotovora+
    Photorhabdus luminescens+
    Proteus mirabilis+
Gammaproteobacteria
    Vibrio cholerae+
    Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1++a
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa++a
    Pseudomonas entomophila L48++a
    Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5++a
    Pseudomonas syringae++a
    Pseudomonas putida++a
    Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396++a
    Chromohalobacter salexigens DSM 3043++a
    Methylococcus capsulatus++a
    Xanthomonas axonopodis++a
    Xanthomonas campestris++a
    Xylella fastidiosa++a
    Idiomarina loihiensis+
    Colwellia psychrerythraea++
    Pseudoalteromonas atlantica T6c++a
    Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125++
    Alteromonas macleodi+
    Nitrosococcus oceani++
    Legionella pneumophila+
    Francisella tularensis+
Betaproteobacteria
    Chromobacterium violaceum+
    Neisseria gonorrhoeae+
    Burkholderia cepacia R18194++
    Burkholderia cenocepacia AU 1054++
    Burkholderia xenovorans+
    Burkholderia mallei+
    Bordetella pertussis+
    Ralstonia eutropha JMP134+
    Ralstonia metallidurans++
    Ralstonia solanacearum+
    Methylobacillus flagellatus+
    Nitrosomonas europaea+
    Azoarcus sp.++
Bacilli/Clostridia
    Bacillus subtilisd++
    Bacillus licheniformis++
    Bacillus cereus+
    Bacillus halodurans++
    Bacillus clausii+
    Geobacillus kaustophilus+
    Oceanobacillus iheyensis+
    Staphylococcus aureus+
Open in a separate windowaGenes that are preceded by candidate Zur binding sites.bZur-regulated cluster is on the virulence plasmid pLVPK.cExamples of organisms with no folE genes are in boldface type.dZn-dependent regulation of B. subtilis folE2 by Zur was experimentally verified (17).Expression of the Bacillus subtilis folE2 gene, yciA, is controlled by the Zn2+-dependent Zur repressor and is upregulated under Zn2+-limiting conditions (17). This led us to propose that the GCYH-IB family utilizes a metal other than Zn2+ to allow growth in Zn2+-limiting environments, a hypothesis strengthened by the observation that an archaeal ortholog from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii has recently been shown to be Fe2+ dependent (22). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the physiological role of GCYH-IB in B. subtilis, an organism that contains both isozymes, as well as the metal dependence of B. subtilis GCYH-IB in vitro. To gain a structural understanding of the metal dependence of GCYH-IB, we determined high-resolution crystal structures of Zn2+- and Mn2+-bound forms of the N. gonorrhoeae ortholog. Notably, although the GCYH-IA and -IB enzymes belong to the tunneling-fold (T-fold) superfamily, there are significant differences in their global and active-site architecture. These studies shed light on the physiological significance of the alternative folate biosynthesis isozymes in bacteria exposed to various metal environments, and offer a structural understanding of the differential metal dependence of GCYH-IA and -IB.  相似文献   

7.
8.
9.
10.
Specific therapy is not available for hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome caused by Andes virus (ANDV). Peptides capable of blocking ANDV infection in vitro were identified using antibodies against ANDV surface glycoproteins Gn and Gc to competitively elute a cyclic nonapeptide-bearing phage display library from purified ANDV particles. Phage was examined for ANDV infection inhibition in vitro, and nonapeptides were synthesized based on the most-potent phage sequences. Three peptides showed levels of viral inhibition which were significantly increased by combination treatment with anti-Gn- and anti-Gc-targeting peptides. These peptides will be valuable tools for further development of both peptide and nonpeptide therapeutic agents.Andes virus (ANDV), an NIAID category A agent linked to hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS), belongs to the family Bunyaviridae and the genus Hantavirus and is carried by Oligoryzomys longicaudatus rodents (11). HCPS is characterized by pulmonary edema caused by capillary leak, with death often resulting from cardiogenic shock (9, 16). ANDV HCPS has a case fatality rate approaching 40%, and ANDV is the only hantavirus demonstrated to be capable of direct person-to-person transmission (15, 21). There is currently no specific therapy available for treatment of ANDV infection and HCPS.Peptide ligands that target a specific protein surface can have broad applications as therapeutics by blocking specific protein-protein interactions, such as preventing viral engagement of host cell receptors and thus preventing infection. Phage display libraries provide a powerful and inexpensive tool to identify such peptides. Here, we used selection of a cyclic nonapeptide-bearing phage library to identify peptides capable of binding the transmembrane surface glycoproteins of ANDV, Gn and Gc, and blocking infection in vitro.To identify peptide sequences capable of recognizing ANDV, we panned a cysteine-constrained cyclic nonapeptide-bearing phage display library (New England Biolabs) against density gradient-purified, UV-treated ANDV strain CHI-7913 (a gift from Hector Galeno, Santiago, Chile) (17, 18). To increase the specificity of the peptides identified, we eluted phage by using monoclonal antibodies (Austral Biologicals) prepared against recombinant fragments of ANDV Gn (residues 1 to 353) or Gc (residues 182 to 491) glycoproteins (antibodies 6B9/F5 and 6C5/D12, respectively). Peptide sequences were determined for phage from iterative rounds of panning, and the ability of phage to inhibit ANDV infection of Vero E6 cells was determined by immunofluorescent assay (IFA) (7). Primary IFA detection antibodies were rabbit polyclonal anti-Sin Nombre hantavirus (SNV) nucleoprotein (N) antibodies which exhibit potent cross-reactivity against other hantavirus N antigens (3). ReoPro, a commercially available Fab fragment which partially blocks infection of hantaviruses in vitro by binding the entry receptor integrin β3 (5), was used as a positive control (80 μg/ml) along with the original antibody used for phage elution (5 μg/ml). As the maximum effectiveness of ReoPro in inhibiting hantavirus entry approaches 80%, we set this as a threshold for maximal expected efficacy for normalization. The most-potent phage identified by elution with the anti-Gn antibody 6B9/F5 bore the peptide CPSNVNNIC and inhibited hantavirus entry by greater than 60% (61%) (Table (Table1).1). From phage eluted with the anti-Gc antibody 6C5/D12, those bearing peptides CPMSQNPTC and CPKLHPGGC also inhibited entry by greater than 60% (66% and 72%, respectively).

TABLE 1.

Peptide-bearing phage eluted from ANDV
Phage% Inhibition (SD)aP valueb
Phage bearing the following peptides eluted with anti-Gn antibody 6B9/F5
    Group 1 (<30% inhibition)
        CDQRTTRLC8.45 (15.34)0.0002
        CPHDPNHPC9.94 (7.72)0.333
        CQSQTRNHC11.76 (13.25)0.0001
        CLQDMRQFC13.26 (9.92)0.0014
        CLPTDPIQC15.70 (14.05)0.0005
        CPDHPFLRC16.65 (15.22)0.8523
        CSTRAENQC17.56 (16.50)0.0004
        CPSHLDAFC18.98 (20.06)0.0017
        CKTGHMRIC20.84 (7.47)0.0563
        CVRTPTHHC20.89 (27.07)0.1483
        CSGVINTTC21.57 (19.61)0.0643
        CPLASTRTC21.65 (5.98)0.004
        CSQFPPRLC22.19 (8.26)0.0004
        CLLNKQNAC22.34 (7.78)0.001
        CKFPLNAAC22.89 (6.15)0.0001
        CSLTPHRSC23.63 (16.74)0.0563
        CKPWPMYSC23.71 (6.68)0.0643
        CLQHDALNC24.01 (7.60)1
        CNANKPKMC24.67 (11.67)0.0004
        CPKHVLKVC25.30 (28.36)0.0003
        CTPDKKSFC26.91 (11.15)0.399
        CHGKAALAC27.22 (32.53)0.005
        CNLMGNPHC28.08 (21.35)0.0011
        CLKNWFQPC28.64 (18.49)0.0016
        CKEYGRQMC28.76 (29.33)0.0362
        CQPSDPHLC29.44 (31.22)0.0183
        CSHLPPNRC29.70 (17.37)0.0061
    Group 2 (30-59% inhibition)
        CSPLLRTVC33.05 (20.26)0.0023
        CHKGHTWNC34.17 (12.50)0.0795
        CINASHAHC35.62 (13.03)0.3193
        CWPPSSRTC36.75 (26.95)0.0006
        CPSSPFNHC37.78 (7.11)0.0001
        CEHLSHAAC38.47 (7.60)0.0115
        CQDRKTSQC38.74 (9.12)0.1802
        CTDVYRPTC38.90 (25.03)0.006
        CGEKSAQLC39.11 (27.52)0.0013
        CSAAERLNC40.13 (6.33)0.0033
        CFRTLEHLC42.07 (5.01)0.0608
        CEKLHTASC43.60 (27.92)0.1684
        CSLHSHKGC45.11 (49.81)0.0864
        CNSHSPVHC45.40 (28.80)0.0115
        CMQSAAAHC48.88 (44.40)0.5794
        CPAASHPRC51.84 (17.09)0.1935
        CKSLGSSQC53.90 (13.34)0.0145
    Group 3 (60-79% inhibition)
        CPSNVNNIC61.11 (25.41)0.1245
Negative control0 (6.15)
6B9/F5 (5 μg/ml)26.77 (5.33)
ReoPro (80 μg/ml)79.86 (4.88)
Phage bearing the following peptides eluted with anti-Gc antibody 6C5/D12
    Group 1 (<30% inhibition)
        CHPGSSSRC1.01 (7.03)0.0557
        CSLSPLGRC10.56 (13.62)0.7895
        CTARYTQHC12.86 (3.83)0.3193
        CHGVYALHC12.91 (7.32)0.0003
        CLQHNEREC16.79 (13.72)0.0958
        CHPSTHRYC17.23 (14.53)0.0011
        CPGNWWSTC19.34(9.91)0.1483
        CGMLNWNRC19.48 (19.42)0.0777
        CPHTQFWQC20.44 (13.65)0.0008
        CTPTMHNHC20.92 (11.68)0.0001
        CDQVAGYSC21.79 (23.60)0.0063
        CIPMMTEFC24.33 (9.28)0.2999
        CERPYSRLC24.38 (9.09)0.0041
        CPSLHTREC25.06 (22.78)0.1202
        CSPLQIPYC26.30 (34.29)0.4673
        CTTMTRMTC (×2)29.27 (8.65)0.0001
    Group 2 (30-59% inhibition)
        CNKPFSLPC30.09 (5.59)0.4384
        CHNLESGTC31.63 (26.67)0.751
        CNSVPPYQC31.96 (6.51)0.0903
        CSDSWLPRC32.95 (28.54)0.259
        CSAPFTKSC33.40 (10.64)0.0052
        CEGLPNIDC35.63 (19.90)0.0853
        CTSTHTKTC36.28 (13.42)0.132
        CLSIHSSVC36.40 (16.44)0.8981
        CPWSTQYAC36.81 (32.81)0.5725
        CTGSNLPIC36.83 (31.64)0.0307
        CSLAPANTC39.73 (4.03)0.1664
        CGLKTNPAC39.75 (16.98)0.2084
        CRDTTPWWC40.08 (18.52)0.0004
        CHTNASPHC40.26 (4.77)0.5904
        CTSMAYHHC41.89 (8.61)0.259
        CSLSSPRIC42.13 (29.75)0.2463
        CVSLEHQNC45.54 (6.55)0.5065
        CRVTQTHTC46.55 (8.45)0.3676
        CPTTKSNVC49.28 (14.00)0.3898
        CSPGPHRVC49.50 (42.60)0.0115
        CKSTSNVYC51.20 (4.60)0.0611
        CTVGPTRSC57.30 (11.31)0.0176
    Group 3 (60-79% inhibition)
        CPMSQNPTC65.60 (13.49)0.014
        CPKLHPGGC71.88 (27.11)0.0059
Negative control0.26 (4.53)
6C5/D12 (5 μg/ml)22.62 (8.40)
ReoPro (80 μg/ml)80.02 (76.64)
Open in a separate windowaStandard deviations of four experiments are shown in parentheses. Peptide-bearing phage were added at 109 phage/μl.bP values for the pairwise amino acid alignment score of each peptide versus that of integrin β3 were determined using an unpaired Student''s t test. P values considered statistically significant are shown in bold.To determine whether the peptide sequences of any of the identified inhibitory phage showed homology to integrin β3, a known entry receptor for pathogenic hantaviruses (6, 7), we used the Gap program to perform a pairwise amino acid alignment of each peptide versus the extracellular portion of integrin β3 and determined P values for the alignments. Of 45 phage eluted with the anti-Gn antibody, 6B9/F5, 27 of the peptide sequences showed homology to integrin β3 (P < 0.05), and 9 were highly significant (P ≤ 0.0005) (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A). Of the latter, CKFPLNAAC and CSQFPPRLC map to the hybrid domain (Fig. (Fig.1B),1B), which is proximal to the plexin-semaphorin-integrin domain (PSI) containing residue D39, shown to be critical for viral entry in vitro (19). Five sequences (CPSSPFNH, CPKHVLKVC, CNANKPKMC, CQSQTRNHC, and CDQRTTRLC) map to the I-like (or βA) domain near the binding site of ReoPro (2). Finally, CLPTDPIQC maps to the epidermal growth factor 4 (EGF-4) domain, and CSTRAENQC aligns to a portion of β3 untraceable in the crystal structure, specifically the linker region between the hybrid domain and EGF-1. Although this represents a disordered portion of the protein (22), the location of this loop proximal to the PSI domain is worth noting, due to the role of the PSI domain in facilitating viral entry (19). Therefore, 60% of phage eluted with the anti-Gn antibody showed some homology to integrin β3, and those with highly significant P values predominantly mapped to or proximal to regions of known interest in viral entry.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Inhibitory peptides identified through phage panning against ANDV show homology to integrin β3. (A) Alignment of phage peptide sequences with P values for integrin β3 pairwise alignment of less than 0.05. Residues comprising the signal peptide, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains, which were not included during pairwise alignment, are underlined. Residues 461 to 548, which are missing in the crystal structure, are italicized. Residues involved in the ReoPro binding site are highlighted in green (2). Residue D39 of the PSI domain is highlighted in yellow (19). Peptides are shown above the sequence of integrin β3, with antibody 6C5/D12-eluted sequences shown in blue text and sequences eluted with antibody 6B9/F5 shown in red. Peptide sequences with alignment P values of ≤0.0005 are highlighted in yellow. Percent inhibition of the peptide-bearing phage is shown in parentheses. (B) View of integrin αvβ3 (PDB ID 1U8C [23]). αv is shown in blue ribbon diagram, and β3 is shown in salmon-colored surface representation, with specific domains circled. Residues corresponding to the ReoPro binding site are shown in green, as in panel A, and D39 is shown in yellow. Regions corresponding to 6C5/D12-eluted peptides with P values of ≤0.0005 for alignment with integrin β3 (highlighted in panel A) are shown in blue, and those corresponding to 6B9/F5-eluted peptides with P values of ≤0.0005 for alignment with integrin β3 are shown in red. Alignment of peptide PLASTRT (P value of 0.0040) adjacent to D39 of the PSI domain is shown in magenta. Graphics were prepared using Pymol (DeLano Scientific LLC, San Carlos, CA).Of the 41 peptide-bearing phage eluted with the anti-Gc antibody 6C5/D12, 14 showed sequence homology to integrin β3 (P < 0.05), 4 of which had P values of ≤0.0005 (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A). Of the latter, sequence CTTMTRMTC mapped to the base of the I-like domain (Fig. (Fig.1B),1B), while CHGVYALHC and CRDTTPWWC mapped to the EGF-3 domain. Finally, sequence CTPTMHNHC mapped to the linker region untraceable in the crystal structure. Therefore, in contrast to peptide sequences identified by competition with the anti-Gn antibody, sequences identified by competition with the anti-Gc antibody 6C5/D12 appear to be mostly unrelated to integrin β3.As a low level of pathogenic hantavirus infection can be seen in cells lacking integrin β3, such as CHO cells (19), we asked if any of the identified peptide sequences could represent a previously unidentified receptor. We used the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool to search a current database of human protein sequences for potential alternate receptors represented by these peptides. However, none of the alignments identified proteins that are expressed at the cell surface, eliminating them as potential candidates for alternate viral entry receptors. This suggests that the majority of the peptides identified here likely represent novel sequences for binding ANDV surface glycoproteins.To determine whether synthetic peptides would also block infection, we synthesized cyclic peptides based on the 10 most-potent peptide-bearing phage. These peptides, in the context of phage presentation, showed levels of inhibition ranging from 44 to 72% (Table (Table2).2). When tested by IFA at 1 mM, four of the synthetic peptides showed inhibition levels significantly lower than those of the same peptide presented in the context of phage. This is not surprising, as steric factors due to the size of the phage and the multivalent presentation of peptide in the context of phage may both contribute to infection inhibition (8). However, there was no significant difference in inhibition by synthetic peptide versus peptide-bearing phage for six of the sequences, implying that inhibition in the context of phage was due solely to the nature of the peptide itself and not to steric factors or valency considerations contributed by the phage, which contrasts with our previous results, determined by using phage directed against αvβ3 integrin (10).

TABLE 2.

Synthetic cyclic peptides inhibit ANDV infection
TargetSample% Inhibition bya:
Peptide-bearing phageSynthetic peptide
GnCMQSAAAHC48.88 (44.40)59.66 (11.17)
GcCTVGPTRSC57.30 (11.31)46.47 (7.61)
GnCPSNVNNIC61.11 (25.41)44.14 (10.74)
GnCEKLHTASC43.60 (27.92)34.87 (9.26)
GcCPKLHPGGC71.88 (27.11)30.95 (7.73)b
GnCSLHSHKGC45.11 (49.81)29.79 (9.34)
GcCPMSQNPTC65.60 (13.49)18.19 (8.55)b
GnCKSLGSSQC53.90 (13.34)18.10 (7.55)b
GnCNSHSPVHC45.40 (28.80)15.52 (10.48)
GnCPAASHPRC51.84 (17.09)0 (10.72)b
Integrin β3ReoPro80.10 (7.72)
Gn6B9/F5 antibody42.72 (6.75)
Gc6C5/D12 antibody31.04 (7.81)
Open in a separate windowaStandard deviations of the results of at least four experiments are shown in parentheses.bMean percent inhibition between phage and synthetic peptide differs significantly (P < 0.05).The three most-potent synthetic peptides were examined for their ability to inhibit ANDV entry in a dose-dependent manner. The concentration of each peptide that produces 50% of its maximum potential inhibitory effect was determined. As shown in Fig. Fig.2A,2A, the 50% inhibitory concentration for each of the peptides was in the range of 10 μM, which from our experience is a reasonable potency for a lead compound to take forward for optimization.Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Activities of synthetic peptides in inhibition of ANDV infection in vitro. (A) Peptides were examined for their ability to block ANDV infection of Vero E6 cells in a dose-dependent manner by IFA. (B) Peptides were tested in parallel for the ability to block infection of Vero E6 cells by ANDV, SNV, HTNV, and PHV. (C) Peptides were tested, singly or in combination, for the ability to block ANDV infection of Vero E6 cells. For all experiments, controls included media, ReoPro at 80 μg/ml, and monoclonal antibodies 6C5/D12 and 6B9/F5 at 5 μg/ml. All peptides were used at 1 mM. Data points represent n = 2 to 6, with error bars showing the standard errors of the means. Statistical analyses were performed on replicate samples using an unpaired Student''s t test.In order to determine the specificity of the three most-potent synthetic cyclic peptides in blocking ANDV, we examined them for inhibition of ANDV infection versus two other pathogenic hantaviruses, SNV and Hantaan virus (HTNV), or the nonpathogenic hantavirus Prospect Hill virus (PHV). As shown in Fig. Fig.2B,2B, ReoPro, which binds integrin β3, showed inhibition of infection by each of the pathogenic hantavirus strains, known to enter cells via β3, but not the nonpathogenic PHV, which enters via integrin β1 (6, 7). In contrast, peptides selected for the ability to bind ANDV were highly specific inhibitors of ANDV versus SNV, HTNV, or PHV. The specificities of peptides eluted by the anti-Gn monoclonal antibody are not surprising, as they are likely due to global differences in the Gn amino acid sequence. Specifically, sequence homologies between ANDV and SNV, HTNV, and PHV are 61%, 36%, and 51%, respectively, for the region corresponding to the immunogen for antibody 6B9/F5. Although homology between the immunogen for antibody 6C5/D12 and the corresponding Gc region of these viruses is somewhat higher (82% with SNV, 63% with HTNV, and 71% with PHV), the possibility that the monoclonal antibody used here recognizes a three-dimensional epitope lends itself to the high specificity of the peptides.The current model for cellular infection by hantaviruses (14) is as follows. Viral binding of the host cell surface target integrin is followed by receptor-mediated endocytosis and endosome acidification. Lowered pH induces conformational changes in Gn and/or Gc, which facilitate membrane fusion and viral release into the cytosol. As there is currently little information available about whether one glycoprotein is dominant in mediating infection, and as neutralizing epitopes have been found on both Gn and Gc glycoproteins (1, 4, 12, 13, 20), we examined whether combining anti-Gn- and anti-Gc-targeted synthetic peptides would lead to an increased infection blockade compared to those for single treatments. As shown in Fig. Fig.2C,2C, the combination of anti-Gn and anti-Gc peptides CMQSAAAHC and CTVGPTRSC resulted in a significant increase in infection inhibition (P = 0.0207 for CMQSAAAHC, and P = 0.0308 for CTVGPTRSC) compared to that resulting from single treatments. Although the high specificity of the peptides for ANDV makes it unlikely that this combination treatment will lead to more cross-reactivity with other pathogenic hantaviruses, this can be determined only by additional testing. Regardless, these data suggest a unique role for each of these viral proteins in the infection process as well as the benefits of targeting multiple viral epitopes for preventing infection.To our knowledge, the peptides reported here are the first identified that directly target ANDV, and this work further illustrates the power of coupling phage display and selective elution techniques in the identification of novel peptide sequences capable of specific protein-protein interactions from a large, random pool of peptide sequences. These novel peptide inhibitors (R. S. Larson, P. R. Hall, H. Njus, and B. Hjelle, U.S. patent application 61/205,211) provide leads for the development of more-potent peptide or nonpeptide organics for therapeutic use against HCPS.  相似文献   

11.
A molecular diagnostic system using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was developed to identify four Sclerotinia species: S. sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, S. minor Jagger, S. trifoliorum Erikss., and the undescribed species Sclerotinia species 1. DNAs of samples are hybridized with each of five 15-bp oligonucleotide probes containing an SNP site midsequence unique to each species. For additional verification, hybridizations were performed using diagnostic single nucleotide substitutions at a 17-bp sequence of the calmodulin locus. The accuracy of these procedures was compared to that of a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method based on Southern hybridizations of EcoRI-digested genomic DNA probed with the ribosomal DNA-containing plasmid probe pMF2, previously shown to differentiate S. sclerotiorum, S. minor, and S. trifoliorum. The efficiency of the SNP-based assay as a diagnostic test was evaluated in a blind screening of 48 Sclerotinia isolates from agricultural and wild hosts. One isolate of Botrytis cinerea was used as a negative control. The SNP-based assay accurately identified 96% of Sclerotinia isolates and could be performed faster than RFLP profiling using pMF2. This method shows promise for accurate, high-throughput species identification.Sclerotinia is distinguished morphologically from other genera in the Sclerotiniaceae (Ascomycota, Pezizomycotina, Leotiomycetes) by the production of tuberoid sclerotia that do not incorporate host tissue, by the production of microconidia that function as spermatia but not as a disseminative asexual state, and by the development of a layer of textura globulosa composing the outer tissue of apothecia (8). Two hundred forty-six species of Sclerotinia have been reported, most distinguished morphotaxonomically (Index Fungorum [www.indexfungorum.org]). These include the four species of agricultural importance now recognized plus many that are imperfectly known, seldom collected, or apparently endemic to relatively small geographic areas (2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17).The main species of phythopathological interest in the genus Sclerotinia are S. sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary, S. minor Jagger, S. trifoliorum Erikss., and the undescribed species Sclerotinia species 1. Sclerotinia species 1 is an important cause of disease in vegetables in Alaska (16) and has been found in association with wild Taraxacum sp., Caltha palustris, and Aconitum septentrionalis in Norway (7). It is morphologically indistinguishable from S. sclerotiorum, but it was shown to be a distinct species based on distinctive polymorphisms in sequences from internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the nuclear ribosomal repeat (7). The other three species have been delimited using morphological, cytological, biochemical, and molecular characters (3, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15). Interestingly, given that the ITS is sufficiently polymorphic in many fungal genera to resolve species, in Sclerotinia, only species 1 and S. trifoliorum are distinguished by characteristic ITS sequence polymorphisms; S. sclerotiorum and S. minor cannot be distinguished based on ITS sequence (2, 7).Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is a necrotrophic pathogen with a broad host range (1). S. minor has a more restricted host range but causes disease in a variety of important crops such as lettuce, peanut, and sunflower crops (11). S. trifoliorum has a much narrower host range, limited to the Fabaceae (3, 8, 9). Sclerotial and ascospore characteristics also serve to differentiate among the three species. Sclerotinia minor has small sclerotia that develop throughout the colony in vitro and aggregate to form crusts on the host, while the sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum and S. trifoliorum are large and form at the colony periphery in vitro, remaining separate on the host (8, 9). The failure of an isolate to produce sclerotia or apothecia in vitro is not unusual, especially after serial cultivation (8). The presence of dimorphic, tetranucleate ascospores characterizes S. trifoliorum, while S. sclerotiorum and S. minor both have uniformly sized ascospores that are binucleate and tetranucleate, respectively (9, 14).With the apparent exception of Sclerotinia species 1, morphological characteristics are sufficient to delimit Sclerotinia species given that workers have all manifestations of the life cycle in hand. In cultures freshly isolated from infected plants, investigators usually have mycelia and sclerotia but not apothecia. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in ribosomal DNA (rDNA) are diagnostic for Sclerotinia species (3, 10), but the assay requires cloned probes (usually accessed from other laboratories) hybridized to Southern blots from vertical gels, an impractical procedure for large samples. We have analyzed sequence data from previous phylogenetic studies (2) and have identified diagnostic variation for the rapid identification of the four Sclerotinia species. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay that we report here is amenable to a high throughput of samples and requires only PCR amplification with a standard set of primers and oligonucleotide hybridizations to Southern blots in a dot format.The SNP assay was performed using two independent sets of species-specific oligonucleotide probes, all with SNP sites shown to differentiate the four Sclerotinia species (Fig. (Fig.1).1). A panel of 49 anonymously coded isolates (Table (Table1)1) was screened using these species-specific SNP probes, as outlined in Fig. Fig.1.1. The assay was validated by comparison to Southern hybridizations of EcoRI-digested genomic DNA hybridized with pMF2, a plasmid probe containing the portion of the rDNA repeat with the 18S, 5.8S, and 26S rRNA cistrons of Neurospora crassa (4, 10).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Protocol for the SNP-based identification of Sclerotinia species, with diagnostic SNP sites underlined and in boldface type for each hybridization probe.

TABLE 1.

Isolates and hybridization results for all SNP-based oligonucleotide probesf
Collector''s isolateAnonymous codePrescreened presumed species identityOriginHostSpecies-specific SNP
IGS50CAL448 S.trifolCAL124CAL448 S.minorRAS148CAL446 S.sp1CAL19ACAL19BCAL448 S.sclero
LMK1849Botrytis cinereaOntario, CanadaAllium cepa
FA2-13Sclerotinia minorNorth CarolinaArachis hypogaea++
W15Sclerotinia minorNorth CarolinaCyperus esculentus++
W1030Sclerotinia minorNorth CarolinaOenothra laciniata++
PF1-138Sclerotinia minorNorth CarolinaArachis hypogaea++
PF18-49714Sclerotinia minorOklahomaArachis hypogaea++
PF17-48246Sclerotinia minorOklahomaArachis hypogaea++
PF19-51948Sclerotinia minorOklahomaArachis hypogaea++
LF-2720Sclerotinia minorUnited StatesLactuca sativa++
AR12811Sclerotinia sclerotiorumArgentinaArachis hypogaea++
AR128216Sclerotinia sclerotiorumArgentinaArachis hypogaea++
LMK2116Sclerotinia sclerotiorumCanadaBrassica napus++
LMK5725Sclerotinia sclerotiorumNorwayRanunculus ficaria++
LMK75415Sclerotinia sclerotiorumNorwayRanunculus ficaria++
UR1939Sclerotinia sclerotiorumUruguayLactuca sativa++
UR4789Sclerotinia sclerotiorumUruguayLactuca sativa++
CA90132Sclerotinia sclerotiorumCaliforniaLactuca sativa++
CA99540Sclerotinia sclerotiorumCaliforniaLactuca sativa++
CA104441Sclerotinia sclerotiorumCaliforniaLactuca sativa++
1980a34Sclerotinia sclerotiorumNebraskaPhaseolus vulgaris++
Ss00113Sclerotinia sclerotiorumNew YorkbGlycine max++
Ssp00531Sclerotinia sclerotiorumNew YorkGlycine max++
H02-V2833Sclerotinia species 1AlaskacUnknown vegetable crop++
H01-V1426Sclerotinia species 1AlaskaUnknown vegetable crop++
LMK74521Sclerotinia species 1NorwayTaraxacum sp.++
02-2611Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlanddTrifolium pratense+
06-1429Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
2022Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
2-L945Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
3-A524Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense
5-L912Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
K14Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
K237Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
L-11223Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
L-11944Sclerotinia trifoliorumFinlandTrifolium pratense++
LMK3619Sclerotinia trifoliorumTasmaniaTrifolium repens++
Ssp00118Sclerotinia trifoliorumNew YorkLotus corniculatus++
Ssp00210Sclerotinia trifoliorumNew YorkLotus corniculatus++
Ssp00328Sclerotinia trifoliorumNew YorkLotus corniculatus++
Ssp00436Sclerotinia trifoliorumNew YorkLotus corniculatus++
LMK4743Sclerotinia trifoliorumVirginiaMedicago sativa++
MBRS-127UnknownAustraliaeBrassica spp.++
MBRS-27UnknownAustraliaBrassica spp.++
MBRS-342UnknownAustraliaBrassica spp.++
MBRS-522UnknownAustraliaBrassica spp.++
WW-135UnknownAustraliaBrassica spp.++
WW-28UnknownAustraliaBrassica spp.++
WW-317UnknownAustraliaBrassica spp.++
WW-447UnknownAustraliaBrassica spp.++
Open in a separate windowaThe annotated genome for S. sclerotiorum strain 1980 (ATCC 18683) is publicly available through the Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA (http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/genome/sclerotinia_sclerotiorum/Home.html).bAll isolates from New York were provided by Gary C. Bergstrom, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Isolates Ss001 and Ssp005 were submitted as S. sclerotiorum, and Ssp001 through Ssp004 were submitted as S. trifoliorum.cAll isolates from Alaska, submitted as Sclerotinia species 1, were provided by Lori Winton, USDA-ARS Subarctic Agricultural Research Unit, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.dAll isolates from Finland, submitted as S. trifoliorum, were provided by Tapani Yli-Mattila, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.eAll isolates from Australia, presumed to be S. sclerotiorum but requiring species confirmation, were provided by Martin Barbetti, DAF Plant Protection Branch, South Perth, Australia.fThe probes that are diagnostic for S. minor, S. sclerotiorum, S. trifoliorum, and Sclerotinia species 1 are listed, with a “+” indicating a positive hybridization for the probe and a “−” indicating no hybridization of the probe.  相似文献   

12.
Escherichia coli isolates (72 commensal and 10 O157:H7 isolates) were compared with regard to physiological and growth parameters related to their ability to survive and persist in the gastrointestinal tract and found to be similar. We propose that nonhuman hosts in E. coli O157:H7 strains function similarly to other E. coli strains in regard to attributes relevant to gastrointestinal colonization.Escherichia coli is well known for its ecological versatility (15). A life cycle which includes both gastrointestinal and environmental stages has been stressed by both Savageau (15) and Adamowicz et al. (1). The gastrointestinal stage would be subjected to acid and detergent stress. The environmental stage is implicit in E. coli having transport systems for fungal siderophores (4) as well as pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent periplasmic glucose utilization (1) because their presence indicates evolution in a location containing fungal siderophores and pyrroloquinoline quinone (1).Since its recognition as a food-borne pathogen, there have been numerous outbreaks of food-borne infection due to E. coli O157:H7, in both ground beef and vegetable crops (6, 13). Cattle are widely considered to be the primary reservoir of E. coli O157:H7 (14), but E. coli O157:H7 does not appear to cause disease in cattle. To what extent is E. coli O157:H7 physiologically unique compared to the other naturally occurring E. coli strains? We feel that the uniqueness of E. coli O157:H7 should be evaluated against a backdrop of other wild-type E. coli strains, and in this regard, we chose the 72-strain ECOR reference collection originally described by Ochman and Selander (10). These strains were chosen from a collection of 2,600 E. coli isolates to provide diversity with regard to host species, geographical distribution, and electromorph profiles at 11 enzyme loci (10).In our study we compared the 72 strains of the ECOR collection against 10 strains of E. coli O157:H7 and six strains of E. coli which had been in laboratory use for many years (Table (Table1).1). The in vitro comparisons were made with regard to factors potentially relevant to the bacteria''s ability to colonize animal guts, i.e., acid tolerance, detergent tolerance, and the presence of the Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway (Table (Table2).2). Our longstanding interest in the ED pathway (11) derives in part from work by Paul Cohen''s group (16, 17) showing that the ED pathway is important for E. coli colonization of the mouse large intestine. Growth was assessed by replica plating 88 strains of E. coli under 40 conditions (Table (Table2).2). These included two LB controls (aerobic and anaerobic), 14 for detergent stress (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide [CTAB], and benzalkonium chloride, both aerobic and anaerobic), 16 for acid stress (pH 6.5, 6.0, 5.0, 4.6, 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, and 4.0), four for the ability to grow in a defined minimal medium (M63 glucose salts with and without thiamine), and four for the presence or absence of a functional ED pathway (M63 with gluconate or glucuronate). All tests were done with duplicate plates in two or three separate trials. The data are available in Tables S1 to S14 in the supplemental material, and they are summarized in Table Table22.

TABLE 1.

E. coli strains used in this study
E. coli strain (n)Source
ECOR strains (72)Thomas Whittman
Laboratory adapted (6)
    K-12 DavisPaul Blum
    CG5C 4401Paul Blum
    K-12 StanfordPaul Blum
    W3110Paul Blum
    BTyler Kokjohn
    AB 1157Tyler Kokjohn
O157:H7 (10)
    FRIK 528Andrew Benson
    ATCC 43895Andrew Benson
    MC 1061Andrew Benson
    C536Tim Cebula
    C503Tim Cebula
    C535Tim Cebula
    ATCC 43889William Cray, Jr.
    ATCC 43890William Cray, Jr.
    ATCC 43888Willaim Cray, Jr.
    ATCC 43894William Cray, Jr.
Open in a separate window

TABLE 2.

Physiological comparison of 88 strains of Escherichia coli
Growth medium or conditionOxygencNo. of strains with type of growthb
ECOR strains (n = 72)
Laboratory strains (n = 6)
O157:H7 strains (n = 10)
GoodPoorNoneVariableGoodPoorNoneVariableGoodPoorNoneVariable
LB controlaBoth72000600010000
1% SDSAerobic6930060008002
5% SDSAerobic6840060008200
1% SDSAnaerobic53154023101702
5% SDSAnaerobic0684004200704
CTABd (all)Both00720006000100
0.05% BACAerobic31158202220091
0.2% BACAerobic01710105000100
0.05% BACAnaerobic2367001500091
0.2% BACAnaerobic00720006000100
pH 6.5Both72000600010000
pH 6Both72000600010000
pH 5Both7020060009001
pH 4.6Both70200600010000
pH 4.3Aerobic14015731203205
pH 4.3Anaerobic6930031201100
pH 4.1 or 4.2Aerobic00720NDgND
pH 4.0Both0072000600091
M63 with supplemente
    GlucoseAerobicf6912050109010
    GlucoseAnaerobicf7002050109010
    GluconateBoth6912050109010
    GlucuronateAerobic6822050109010
    GlucuronateAnaerobic6912050109010
Open in a separate windowaEight LB controls were run, two for each set of LB experiments: SDS, CTAB, benzalkonium chloride (BAC), and pH stress.bGrowth was measured as either +++, +, or 0 (good, poor, and none, respectively), with +++ being the growth achieved on the LB control plates. “Variable” means that two or three replicates did not agree. All experiments were done at 37°C.c“Anaerobic” refers to use of an Oxoid anaerobic chamber. Aerobic and anaerobic growth data are presented together when the results were identical and separately when the results were not the same or the anaerobic set had not been done. LB plates were measured after 1 (aerobic) or 2 (anaerobic) days, and the M63 plates were measured after 2 or 3 days.dCTAB used at 0.05, 0.2%, and 0.4%.eM63 defined medium (3) was supplemented with glucose, gluconate, or glucuronate, all at 0.2%.fIdentical results were obtained with and without 0.0001% thiamine.gND, not determined.  相似文献   

13.
Melioidosis has been considered an emerging disease in Brazil since the first cases were reported to occur in the northeast region. This study investigated two municipalities in Ceará state where melioidosis cases have been confirmed to occur. Burkholderia pseudomallei was isolated in 26 (4.3%) of 600 samples in the dry and rainy seasons.Melioidosis is an endemic disease in Southeast Asia and northern Australia (2, 4) and also occurs sporadically in other parts of the world (3, 7). Human melioidosis was reported to occur in Brazil only in 2003, when a family outbreak afflicted four sisters in the rural part of the municipality of Tejuçuoca, Ceará state (14). After this episode, there was one reported case of melioidosis in 2004 in the rural area of Banabuiú, Ceará (14). And in 2005, a case of melioidosis associated with near drowning after a car accident was confirmed to occur in Aracoiaba, Ceará (11).The goal of this study was to investigate the Tejuçuoca and Banabuiú municipalities, where human cases of melioidosis have been confirmed to occur, and to gain a better understanding of the ecology of Burkholderia pseudomallei in this region.We chose as central points of the study the residences and surrounding areas of the melioidosis patients in the rural areas of Banabuiú (5°18′35″S, 38°55′14″W) and Tejuçuoca (03°59′20″S, 39°34′50′W) (Fig. (Fig.1).1). There are two well-defined seasons in each of these locations: one rainy (running from January to May) and one dry (from June to December). A total of 600 samples were collected at five sites in Tejuçuoca (T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5) and five in Banabuiú (B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5), distributed as follows (Fig. (Fig.2):2): backyards (B1 and T1), places shaded by trees (B2 and T2), water courses (B3 and T3), wet places (B4 and T4), and stock breeding areas (B5 and T5).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Municipalities of Banabuiú (5°18′35″S, 38°55′14″W) and Tejuçuoca (03°59′20″S, 39°34′50″W).Open in a separate windowFIG. 2.Soil sampling sites in Banabuiú and Tejuçuoca.Once a month for 12 months (a complete dry/rainy cycle), five samples were gathered at five different depths: at the surface and at 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm (Table (Table1).1). The samples were gathered according to the method used by Inglis et al. (9). Additionally, the sample processing and B. pseudomallei identification were carried out as previously reported (1, 8, 9).

TABLE 1.

Distribution of samples with isolates by site and soil depth
Sitesa and depth (cm)No. of B. pseudomallei isolates in samples from:
Banabuiú (n = 300)Tejuçuoca (n = 300)Total (n = 600)
B1/T13
    Surface2
    10
    201
    30
    40
B2/T21
    Surface1
    10
    20
    30
    40
B3/T315
    Surface2
    102
    204
    303
    404
B4/T45
    Surface
    101
    201
    3011
    401
B5/T52
    Surface
    10
    20
    302
    40
Total62026
Open in a separate windowaSites designated with B are in Banabuiú, and sites designated with T are in Tejuçuoca. See the text for details.The data on weather and soil composition were obtained from specialized government institutions, such as FUNCEME, IPECE, and EMBRAPA. The average annual temperature in both municipalities is between 26 and 28°C. In 2007, the annual rainfall in Tejuçuoca was 496.8 mm, and that in Banabuiú was 766.8 mm. There are a range of soil types in both Tejuçuoca and Banabuiú: noncalcic brown, sodic planossolic, red-yellow podzolic, and litholic. In Banabuiú, there are also alluvial and cambisol soils. The characteristic vegetation in both municipalities is caatinga (scrublands).There were isolates of B. pseudomallei in 26 (4.3%) of the 600 samples collected. The bacterium was isolated at a rate (3%) similar to that previously reported (9). The bacterium isolation occurred in both the dry (53.8%) and the rainy (46.2%) seasons. Tejuçuoca represented 76.9% (20/26) of the strains isolated. Four sites in Tejuçuoca (T1, T3, T4, and T5) and three in Banabuiú (B1, B2, and B4) presented isolates of the bacterium (Table (Table1).1). The isolation of the B. pseudomallei strains varied from the surface down to 40 cm. However, 17 of the 26 positive samples (65.3%) were found at depths between 20 and 40 cm (Table (Table1).1). Only two isolates were found at the surface during the dry season.A study in Vietnam (13) and one in Australia (9) reported the presence of B. pseudomallei near the houses of melioidosis patients. In our study, the same thing happened. Site T3 (15/26; 57.6%) was located 290 m from the patient''s house, as reported by the Rolim group (14).B. pseudomallei was isolated from a sheep paddock in Australia, where animals sought shelter below mango and fig trees (17). In our study, the bacterium was isolated at site T5, a goat corral alongside the house where the outbreak occurred in Tejuçuoca. Four sites in places shaded by trees yielded positive samples (30.7%) in both Tejuçuoca (palm trees) and Banabuiú (mango trees). Additionally, B. pseudomallei was isolated on three occasions from a cornfield (site 4B) located alongside the house of the melioidosis patient in Banabuiú.In the main areas of endemicity, the disease is more prevalent in the rainy season (4, 5, 16). The outbreak in Tejuçuoca was related to rainfall (14). Besides the association of cases of the disease with rainfall itself, the isolation of B. pseudomallei in soil and water was also demonstrated during the dry season (12, 15). An Australian study isolated strains from soil and water during the dry and rainy seasons (17). A Thai study also reported B. pseudomallei in the dry season (18). In our study, the isolation of B. pseudomallei took place either at the end of the wet season or in the dry months. Fourteen of the positive samples (53.8%) were collected during the dry season, albeit near a river or reservoir (sites T3 and B4).Physical, biological, and chemical soil features appear to influence the survival of B. pseudomallei (6, 10). In the present study, the soil was classified as litholic with sandy or clayey textures. It is susceptible to erosion, and when there is a lack of water, it is subject to salinization. During the dry season, the clay layer becomes dried, cracked, and very hard. During the rainy season, it becomes soggy and sticky. The isolation of B. pseudomallei in the dry season is possibly related to the capacity for adaptation of this soil, since the extreme conditions of lithosols do not prevent the bacterial growth and survival.It has been shown that B. pseudomallei is more often isolated at depths between 25 and 45 cm (17). In our study, 65.3% of the positive samples were taken at depths between 20 and 40 cm. Moreover, of these 17 samples, 10 (58.8%) were collected during the dry months. Also, unlike in other regions, two positive samples were taken from the surface in the period without rainfall.The rainfall in Tejuçuoca and Banabuiú is generally low, and temperatures do not vary significantly during the year. Therefore, the isolation of B. pseudomallei in these places occurs outside the rainfall, temperature, and moisture conditions observed in other regions of endemicity. Our data thus suggest that peculiar environmental features, such as soil composition, might favor the multiplication of B. pseudomallei in northeast Brazil.  相似文献   

14.
15.
Twelve cluster groups of Escherichia coli O26 isolates found in three cattle farms were monitored in space and time. Cluster analysis suggests that only some O26:H11 strains had the potential for long-term persistence in hosts and farms. As judged by their virulence markers, bovine enterohemorrhagic O26:H11 isolates may represent a considerable risk for human infection.Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains comprise a group of zoonotic enteric pathogens (42). In humans, infections with some STEC serotypes result in hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic diarrhea, which can be complicated by hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) (49). These STEC strains are also designated “enterohemorrhagic E. coli” (EHEC). Consequently, EHEC strains represent a subgroup of STEC with a high pathogenic potential for humans. Strains of the E. coli serogroup O26 were originally classified as enteropathogenic E. coli due to their association with outbreaks of infantile diarrhea in the 1940s. In 1977, Konowalchuk et al. (37) recognized that these bacteria produced Stx, and 10 years later, the Stx-producing E. coli O26:H11/H− strains were classified as EHEC. EHEC O26 strains constitute the most common non-O157 EHEC group associated with diarrhea and HUS in Europe (12, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 55, 60). Reports on an association between EHEC O26 and HUS or diarrhea from North America including the United States (15, 30, 33), South America (51, 57), Australia (22), and Asia (31, 32) provide further evidence for the worldwide spread of these organisms. Studies in Germany and Austria (26, 27) on sporadic HUS cases between 1996 and 2003 found that EHEC O26 accounted for 14% of all EHEC strains and for ∼40% of non-O157 EHEC strains obtained from these patients. A proportion of 11% EHEC O26 strains was detected in a case-control study in Germany (59) between 2001 and 2003. In the age group <3 years, the number of EHEC O26 cases was nearly equal to that of EHEC O157 cases, although the incidence of EHEC O26-associated disease is probably underestimated because of diagnostic limitations in comparison to the diagnosis of O157:H7/H− (18, 34). Moreover, EHEC O26 has spread globally (35). Beutin (6) described EHEC O26:H11/H−, among O103:H2, O111:H, O145:H28/H−, and O157:H7/H−, as the well-known pathogenic “gang of five,” and Bettelheim (5) warned that we ignore the non-O157 STEC strains at our peril.EHEC O26 strains produce Stx1, Stx2, or both (15, 63). Moreover, these strains contain the intimin-encoding eae gene (11, 63), a characteristic feature of EHEC (44). In addition, EHEC strains possess other markers associated with virulence, such as a large plasmid that carries further potential virulence genes, e.g., genes coding for EHEC hemolysin (EHEC-hlyA), a catalase-peroxidase (katP), and an extracellular serine protease (espP) (17, 52). The efa1 (E. coli factor for adherence 1) gene was identified as an intestinal colonization factor in EHEC (43). EHEC O26 represents a highly dynamic group of organisms that rapidly generate new pathogenic clones (7, 8, 63).Ruminants, especially cattle, are considered the primary reservoir for human infections with EHEC. Therefore, the aim of this study was the molecular characterization of bovine E. coli field isolates of serogroup O26 using a panel of typical virulence markers. The epidemiological situation in the beef herds from which the isolates were obtained and the spatial and temporal behavior of the clonal distribution of E. coli serogroup O26 were analyzed during the observation period. The potential risk of the isolates inducing disease in humans was assessed.In our study, 56 bovine E. coli O26:H11 isolates and one bovine O26:H32 isolate were analyzed for EHEC virulence-associated factors. The isolates had been obtained from three different beef farms during a long-term study. They were detected in eight different cattle in farm A over a period of 15 months (detected on 10 sampling days), in 3 different animals in farm C over a period of 8 months (detected on 3 sampling days), and in one cow on one sampling day in farm D (Table (Table1)1) (28).

TABLE 1.

Typing of E. coli O26 isolates
Sampling day, source, and isolateSerotypeVirulence profile by:
fliC PCR-RFLPstx1 genestx2 geneStx1 (toxin)Stx2 (toxin)Subtype(s)
efa1 genebEHEC-hlyA genekatP geneespP genePlasmid size(s) in kbCluster
stx1/stx2eaetirespAespB
Day 15
    Animal 6 (farm A)
        WH-01/06/002-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/06/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/06/002-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
    Animal 8 (farm A)
        WH-01/08/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
    Animal 26 (farm A)
        WH-01/26/001-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 127
        WH-01/26/001-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/26/001-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 127
        WH-01/26/001-7O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/−+++110, 127
Day 29
    Animal 2 (farm A)
        WH-01/02/003-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-7O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-8O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ−/++++110, 126
        WH-01/02/003-9O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++1106
        WH-01/02/003-10O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++1106
    Animal 26 (farm A)
        WH-01/26/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
        WH-01/26/002-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
        WH-01/26/002-8O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
        WH-01/26/002-9O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++110, 125
        WH-01/26/002-10O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 125
Day 64
    Animal 20 (farm A)
        WH-01/20/005-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+130, 2.52
Day 78
    Animal 29 (farm A)
        WH-01/29/002-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/−+130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.54
        WH-01/29/002-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++130, 12, 2.54
Day 106
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/005-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/−+++145, 110, 123
        WH-01/27/005-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.55
        WH-01/27/005-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+130, 12, 2.55
Day 113
    Animal 7 (farm C)
        WH-04/07/001-2O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/+++55, 35, 2.511
        WH-04/07/001-4O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++5512
        WH-04/07/001-6O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++5512
Day 170
    Animal 22 (farm C)
        WH-04/22/001-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 6.312
        WH-04/22/001-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 6.312
        WH-04/22/001-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 6.312
Day 176
    Animal 14 (farm D)
        WH-03/14/004-8O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/+++11010
Day 218
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/009-1O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/009-2O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/009-3O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 128
        WH-01/27/009-8O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++110, 128
        WH-01/27/009-9O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 129
Day 309
    Animal 29 (farm A)
        WH-01/29/010-1O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 35, 124
        WH-01/29/010-2O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++130, 55, 358
        WH-01/29/010-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 35, 128
Day 365
    Animal 8 (farm C)
        WH-04/08/008-6O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 5512
Day 379
    Animal 9 (farm A)
        WH-01/09/016-2O26:H32H32++stx1/stx2−/−145, 130, 1.81
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/014-3O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/014-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 129
        WH-01/27/014-5O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 128
Day 407
    Animal 29 (farm A)
        WH-01/29/013-4O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 2.58
        WH-01/29/013-7O26:H11H11++stx1ββββ+/++++110, 12, 2.58
Day 478
    Animal 27 (farm A)
        WH-01/27/017-1O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 128
        WH-01/27/017-5O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++110, 128
        WH-01/27/017-6O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++1108
        WH-01/27/017-7O26:H11H11++++stx1/stx2ββββ+/++++1108
        WH-01/27/017-10O26:H11H11+++stx1ββββ+/++++130, 12, 2.58
Open in a separate windowastx1/stx2, gene stx1 or stx2.befa1 was detected by two hybridizations (with lifA1-lifA2 and lifA3-lifA4 probes). +/+, complete gene; +/− or −/+, incomplete gene; −/−, efa1 negative.The serotyping of the O26 isolates was confirmed by the results of the fliC PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis performed according to Fields et al. (25), with slight modifications described by Zhang et al. (62). All O26:H11 isolates showed the H11 pattern described by Zhang et al. (62). In contrast, the O26:H32 isolate demonstrated a different fliC RFLP pattern that was identical to the H32 pattern described by the same authors. It has been demonstrated that EHEC O26:H11 strains belong to at least four different sequence types (STs) in the common clone complex 29 (39). In the multilocus sequence typing analysis for E. coli (61), the tested five EHEC O26:H11 isolates (WH-01/02/003-1, WH-01/20/005-3, WH-01/27/009-9, WH-03/14/004-8, and WH-04/22/001-1) of different farms and clusters were characterized as two sequence types (ST 21 and ST 396). The isolates from farms A and C belong to ST 21, the most frequent ST of EHEC O26:H11 isolates found in humans and animals (39), but the single isolate from farm D was characterized as ST 396.Typing and subtyping of genes (stx1 and/or stx2, eae, tir, espA, espB, EHEC-hlyA, katP, and espP) associated with EHEC were performed with LightCycler fluorescence PCR (48) and different block-cycler PCRs. To identify the subtypes of the stx2 genes and of the locus of enterocyte effacement-encoding genes eae, tir, espA, and espB, the PCR products were digested by different restriction endonucleases (19, 26, 46). The complete pattern of virulence markers was detected in most bovine isolates examined in our study. An stx1 gene was present in all O26 isolates. In addition, an stx2 gene was found in nine O26:H11 isolates in farm A and in three isolates of the same type in farm C, as well as in the O26:H32 isolate. Both Stx1 and Stx2 were closely related to families of Stx1 and Stx2 variants or alleles. EHEC isolates with stx2 genes are significantly more often associated with HUS and other severe disease manifestations than isolates with an stx1 gene, which are more frequently associated with uncomplicated diarrhea and healthy individuals (13). In contrast to STEC strains harboring stx2 gene variants, however, STEC strains of the stx2 genotype were statistically significantly associated with HUS (26). The stx2 genotype was found in all O26 isolates with an stx2 gene, while the GK3/GK4 amplification products after digestion with HaeIII and FokI restriction enzymes showed the typical pattern for this genotype described by Friedrich et al. (26). The nucleotide sequences of the A and B subunits of the stx2 gene of the selected bovine O26:H11 isolate WH-01/27/017-1 (GenBank accession no. EU700491) were identical to the stx2 genes of different sorbitol-fermenting EHEC O157:H− strains associated with human HUS cases and other EHEC infections in Germany (10) and 99.3% identical in their DNA sequences to the stx2 gene of the EHEC type strain EDL933, a typical O157:H7 isolate from an HUS patient. A characteristic stx1 genotype was present in all O26 isolates. The nucleotide sequences of the A and B subunits of the stx1 gene of the tested bovine O26:H11 isolate WH-01/27/017-1 (GenBank accession no. EU700490) were nearly identical to those of the stx1 genes of the EHEC O26:H11 reference type strains H19 and DEC10B, which had been associated with human disease outbreaks in Canada and Australia. Nucleotide exchanges typical for stx1c and stx1d subtypes as described by Kuczius et al. (38) were not found. All bovine O26:H11 strains produced an Stx1 with high cytotoxicity for Vero cells tested by Stx enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Vero cell neutralization assay (53). The Stx2 cytotoxicity for Vero cells was also very high in the O26:H11 isolates.Not only factors influencing the basic and inducible Stx production are important in STEC pathogenesis. It has been suggested that the eae and EHEC-hlyA genes are likely contributors to STEC pathogenicity (2, 3, 13, 50). Ritchie et al. (50) found both genes in all analyzed HUS-associated STEC isolates. In all O26:H11 isolates we obtained, stx genes were present in combination with eae genes. Only the O26:H32 isolate lacked an eae gene. To date, 10 distinct variants of eae have been described (1, 19, 36, 45, 47). Some serotypes were closely associated with a particular intimin variant: the O157 serogroup was linked to γ-eae, the O26 serogroup to β-eae, and the O103 serogroup to ɛ-eae (4, 19, 20, 58). Our study confirms these associations. All bovine O26:H11 isolates were also typed as members of the β-eae subgroup. A translocated intimin receptor gene (tir gene) and the type III secreted proteins encoded by the espA and espB genes were found in all 56 O26:H11 isolates but not in the O26:H32 isolate. These other tested locus of enterocyte effacement-associated genes belonged to the β-subgroups. These results are in accord with the results of China et al. (19), who detected the pathotypes β-eae, β-tir, β-espA, and β-espB in all investigated human O26 strains. Like the eae gene, the EHEC-hlyA gene was found in association with severe clinical disease in humans (52). Aldick et al. (2) showed that EHEC hemolysin is toxic (cytolytic) to human microvascular endothelial cells and may thus contribute to the pathogenesis of HUS. In our study, the EHEC-hlyA gene was detected in 50 of the 56 bovine E. coli O26:H11 isolates which harbored virulence-associated plasmids of different sizes (Table (Table1).1). The presence of virulence-associated plasmids corresponded to the occurrence of additional virulence markers such as the espP and katP genes (17). The katP gene and the espP gene were detected in 49 and 50 of the 56 O26:H11 isolates, respectively. The espP gene was missing in six of the seven bovine O26:H11 isolates in which the katP genes were also absent. Both genes were not found in the O26:H32 isolate (Table (Table1).1). Although we found large plasmids of the same size in O26:H11 isolates, they lacked one or more of the plasmid-associated virulence factors (Table (Table1).1). Two DNA probes were used to detect the efa1 genes by colony hybridization. (DNA probes were labeled with digoxigenin [DIG] with lifA1-lifA2 and lifA3-lifA4 primers [14] using the PCR DIG probe synthesis kit [Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany]; DIG Easy Hyb solution [Roche] was used for prehybridization and hybridization.) Positive results with both DNA probes were obtained for 52 of 56 E. coli O26:H11 isolates. A positive signal was only found in three isolates with the lifA1-lifA2 DNA probe and in one isolate with the lifA3-lifA4 probe. An efa1 gene was not detected in the O26:H32 isolate (Table (Table11).We also analyzed the spatial and temporal behavior of the O26:H11/H32 isolates in the beef herds by cluster analysis (conducted in PAUP* for Windows version 4.0, 2008 [http://paup.csit.fsu.edu/about.html]). This was performed with distance matrices using the neighbor-joining algorithm, an agglomerative cluster method which generates a phylogenetic tree. The distance matrices were calculated by pairwise comparisons of the fragmentation patterns produced by genomic typing through pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis with four restriction endonucleases (XbaI, NotI, BlnI, and SpeI) and the presence or absence of potential virulence markers (Fig. (Fig.11 and Table Table1).1). To this end, the total character difference was used, which counts the pairwise differences between two given patterns. During a monitoring program of 3 years in four cattle farms (29), different O26:H11 cluster groups and one O26:H32 isolate were detected in three different farms. The genetic distance of the O26:H32 isolate was very high relative to the O26:H11 isolates. Therefore, the O26:H32 isolate was outgrouped. The O26:H11 isolates of each farm represented independent cluster groups. The single isolate from farm D fitted better to the isolates from farm C than to those from farm A. This finding is in accord with the geographical distance between the farms. The fact that the farms were located in neighboring villages may suggest that direct or indirect connections between the farms were possible (e.g., by person contacts or animal trade). However, the isolates from farm C and farm D belonged to different sequence types (ST 21 and ST 396), which may argue against a direct connection. Interestingly, O26:H11 isolates with and without stx2 genes were detected in the same clusters. This phenomenon was observed in both farm A and farm C. In farm A, the isolates with additional stx2 genes were found in animal 27 and were grouped in clusters 8 and 9 (day 218). An stx2 gene was repeatedly found (four isolates) in the same animal (animal 27). The isolates grouped in cluster 8 on a later day of sampling (day 478). All other O26:H11 isolates grouped in the same clusters and obtained from the same animals (27 and 29) on different sampling days lacked an stx2 gene. Also, the isolates obtained from animal 27 on previous sampling days, which grouped in clusters 3 and 5, exhibited no stx2 genes. In farm C, the three isolates with additional stx2 genes obtained from animal 7 grouped in clusters 11 and 12. An stx2 gene was absent from all other O26:H11 isolates grouped in the same cluster 12 on later sampling days, and no other isolates of cluster 11 were found later on. However, we detected members of many clusters over relatively long periods (clusters 5, 8, and 9 in farm A and cluster 12 in farm C), but members of other clusters were only found on single occasions. This patchy temporal pattern is apparently not a unique property of O26:H11, as we found similar results for cluster groups of other EHEC serotypes of bovine origin (28). The isolates grouped in the dominant cluster 8 were found on 5 of 9 sampling days over a period of 10 months. In contrast, we found the members of clusters 4, 5, 9, and 12 only on two nonconsecutive sampling days. The period during which isolates of these groups were not detected was particularly long for cluster 4 (231 days). We also observed the coexistence of different clusters over long periods in the same farm and in the same cattle (clusters 8 and 9), while one of the clusters dominated. Transmission of clusters between cattle was also observed. These results suggest that some of the EHEC O26:H11 strains had the potential for a longer persistence in the host population, while others had not. The reasons for this difference are not yet clear. Perhaps the incomplete efa1 gene found in isolates of clusters which were only detected once might explain why some strains disappeared rapidly. Efa1 has been discussed as a potential E. coli colonization factor for the bovine intestine used by non-O157 STEC, including O26 (54, 56). The O165:H25 cluster detected during a longer period in farm B may have disappeared after it had lost its efa1 gene (28). The precise biological activity of Efa1 in EHEC O26 is not yet known, but it has been demonstrated that the molecule is a non-Stx virulence determinant which can increase the virulence of EHEC O26 in humans (8).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Neighbor-joining tree of bovine E. coli O26:H11/H32 strains based on the restriction pattern obtained after digestion with XbaI, NotI, BlnI, and SpeI.We distinguished 12 different clusters, but complete genetic identity was only found in two isolates. The variations in the O26:H11 clusters may be due to increasing competition between the bacterial populations of the various subtypes in the bovine intestine or to potential interactions between EHEC O26:H11 and the host.The ephemeral occurrence of additional stx2 genes in different clusters and farms may be the result of recombination events due to horizontal gene transfer (16). The loss of stx genes may occur rapidly in the course of an infection, but the reincorporation by induction of an stx-carrying bacteriophage into the O26:H11 strains is possible at any time (9, 40). Nevertheless, an additional stx2 gene may increase the dangerousness of the respective EHEC O26:H11 strains. While all patients involved in an outbreak caused by an EHEC O26:H11 strain harboring the gene encoding Stx2 developed HUS (41), the persons affected by another outbreak caused by an EHEC O26:H11 strain that produced exclusively Stx1 had only uncomplicated diarrhea (60).In conclusion, our results showed that bovine O26:H11 isolates can carry virulence factors of EHEC that are strongly associated with EHEC-related disease in humans, particularly with severe clinical manifestations such as hemorrhagic colitis and HUS. Therefore, strains of bovine origin may represent a considerable risk for human infection. Moreover, some clusters of EHEC O26:H11 persisted in cattle and farms over longer periods, which may increase the risk of transmission to other animals and humans even further.  相似文献   

16.
17.
The effects of the challenge dose and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class IB alleles were analyzed in 112 Mauritian cynomolgus monkeys vaccinated (n = 67) or not vaccinated (n = 45) with Tat and challenged with simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6Pcy243. In the controls, the challenge dose (10 to 20 50% monkey infectious doses [MID50]) or MHC did not affect susceptibility to infection, peak viral load, or acute CD4 T-cell loss, whereas in the chronic phase of infection, the H1 haplotype correlated with a high viral load (P = 0.0280) and CD4 loss (P = 0.0343). Vaccination reduced the rate of infection acquisition at 10 MID50 (P < 0.0001), and contained acute CD4 loss at 15 MID50 (P = 0.0099). Haplotypes H2 and H6 were correlated with increased susceptibility (P = 0.0199) and resistance (P = 0.0087) to infection, respectively. Vaccination also contained CD4 depletion (P = 0.0391) during chronic infection, independently of the challenge dose or haplotype.Advances in typing of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) of Mauritian cynomolgus macaques (14, 20, 26) have provided the opportunity to address the influence of host factors on vaccine studies (13). Retrospective analysis of 22 macaques vaccinated with Tat or a Tat-expressing adenoviral vector revealed that monkeys with the H6 or H3 MHC class IB haplotype were overrepresented among aviremic or controller animals, whereas macaques with the H2 or H5 haplotype clustered in the noncontrollers (12). More recently, the H6 haplotype was reported to correlate with control of chronic infection with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) mac251, regardless of vaccination (18).Here, we performed a retrospective analysis of 112 Mauritian cynomolgus macaques, which included the 22 animals studied previously (12), to evaluate the impact of the challenge dose and class IB haplotype on the acquisition and severity of simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6Pcy243 infection in 45 control monkeys and 67 monkeys vaccinated with Tat from different protocols (Table (Table11).

TABLE 1.

Summary of treatment, challenge dose, and outcome of infection in cynomolgus monkeys
Protocol codeNo. of monkeysImmunogen (dose)aAdjuvantbSchedule of immunization (wk)RoutecChallenged (MID50)Virological outcomee
Reference(s) or source
ACV
ISS-ST6Tat (10)Alum or RIBI0, 2, 6, 12, 15, 21, 28, 32, 36s.c., i.m.104114, 17
ISS-ST1Tat (6)None0, 5, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 38, 42, 48i.d.101004, 17
ISS-PCV3pCV-tat (1 mg)Bupivacaine + methylparaben0, 2, 6, 11, 15, 21, 28, 32, 36i.m.103006
ISS-ID3Tat (6)none0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 39, 43, 60i.d.10111B. Ensoli, unpublished data
ISS-TR6Tat (10)Alum-Iscom0, 2, 6, 11, 16, 21, 28, 32, 36s.c., i.d., i.m.10420Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TGf3Tat (10)Alum0, 4, 12, 22s.c.1503Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TG3Tatcys22 (10)Alum1503Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TG4Tatcys22 (10) + Gag (60)Alum1504Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-TG4Tat (10) + Gag (60)Alum1504Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-MP3Tat (10)H1D-Alum0, 4, 12, 18, 21, 38s.c., i.m.15021Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-MP3Tat (10)Alums.c.15003Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-GS6Tat (10)H1D-Alum0, 4, 12, 18, 21, 36s.c., i.m.15132Ensoli, unpublished
NCI-Ad-tat/Tat7Ad-tat (5 × 108 PFU), Tat (10)Alum0, 12, 24, 36i.n., i.t., s.c.15232Ensoli, unpublished
NCI-Tat9Tat (6 and 10)Alum/Iscom0, 2, 6, 11, 15, 21, 28, 32, 36s.c., i.d., i.m.1524312
ISS-NPT3pCV-tat (1 mg)Bupivacaine + methylparaben-Iscom0, 2, 8, 13, 17, 22, 28, 46, 71i.m.20003Ensoli, unpublished
ISS-NPT3pCV-tatcys22 (1 mg)Bupivacaine + methylparaben-Iscom0, 2, 8, 13, 17, 22, 28, 46, 71i.m.20111
    Total vaccinated67191731
        Naive11NoneNoneNAgNA10 or 15137
        Control34None, Ad, or pCV-0Alum, RIBI, H1D, Iscom or bupivacaine + methylparaben-Iscoms.c., i.d., i.n., i.t., i.m.10, 15, or 2051316
    Total controls4561623
    Total112253354
Open in a separate windowaAll animals were inoculated with the indicated dose of Tat plasmid DNA (pCV-tat [8], adenovirus-tat [Ad-tat] [27]) or protein, Gag protein, or empty vectors (pCV-0, adenovirus [Ad]) by the indicated route. Doses are in micrograms unless indicated otherwise.bAlum, aluminum phosphate (4); RIBI oil-in-water emulsions containing squalene, bacterial monophosphoryl lipid A, and refined mycobacterial products (4); Iscom, immune-stimulating complex (4); H1D are biocompatible anionic polymeric microparticles used for vaccine delivery (10, 12, 25a).cs.c., subcutaneous; i.m., intramuscular; i.d., intradermal; i.n., intranasal; i.t., intratracheal.dAll animals were inoculated intravenously with the indicated dose of the same SHIV89.6.Pcy243 stock.eAccording to the virological outcome upon challenge, monkeys were grouped as aviremic (A), controllers (C), or viremic (V).fBecause of the short follow-up, controller status could not be determined and all infected monkeys of the ISS-TG protocol were therefore considered viremic.gNA, not applicable.  相似文献   

18.
Presented here is the first report describing the detection of potentially diarrheal Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from cultured bivalves on the Mediterranean coast, providing data on the presence of both tdh- and trh-positive isolates. Potentially diarrheal V. parahaemolyticus strains were isolated from four species of bivalves collected from both bays of the Ebro delta, Spain.Gastroenteritis caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus has been reported worldwide, though only sporadic cases have been reported in Europe (7, 14). The bacterium can be naturally present in seafood, but pathogenic isolates capable of inducing gastroenteritis in humans are rare in environmental samples (2 to 3%) (15) and are often not detected (10, 19, 20).The virulence of V. parahaemolyticus is based on the presence of a thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) and/or the thermostable direct hemolysin-related gene (trh) (1, 5). Both are associated with gastrointestinal illnesses (2, 9).Spain is not only the second-largest producer in the world of live bivalve molluscs but also one of the largest consumers of bivalve molluscs, and Catalonia is the second-most important bivalve producer of the Spanish Autonomous Regions. Currently, the cultivation of bivalves in this area is concentrated in the delta region of the Ebro River. The risk of potentially pathogenic Vibrio spp. in products placed on the market is not assessed by existing legislative indices of food safety in the European Union, which emphasizes the need for a better knowledge of the prevalence of diarrheal vibrios in seafood products. The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution and pathogenic potential of V. parahaemolyticus in bivalve species exploited in the bays of the Ebro delta.Thirty animals of each species of Mytilus galloprovincialis, Crassostrea gigas, Ruditapes decussatus, and Ruditapes philippinarum were collected. They were sampled from six sites of the culture area, three in each bay of the Ebro River delta, at the beginning (40°37′112"N, 0°37′092"E [Alfacs]; 40°46′723"N, 0°43′943"E [Fangar]), middle (40°37′125"N, 0°38′570"E [Alfacs]; 40°46′666"N, 0°45′855"E [Fangar]), and end (40°37′309"N, 0°39′934"E [Alfacs]; 40°46′338"N, 0°44′941"E [Fangar]) of the culture polygon. Clams were sampled from only one site per bay as follows: in the Alfacs Bay from a natural bed of R. decussatus (40°37′44"N, 0°38′0"E) and in the Fangar Bay from an aquaculture bed of R. philippinarum (40°47′3"N, 0°43′8"E). In total, 367 samples were analyzed in 2006 (180 oysters, 127 mussels, 30 carpet shell clams, and 30 Manila clams) and 417 samples were analyzed in 2008 (178 oysters, 179 mussels, 30 carpet shell clams, and 30 Manila clams).All animals were individually processed and homogenized, and 1 ml of the homogenate was inoculated into 9 ml of alkaline peptone water (Scharlau, Spain). Following a 6-h incubation at 37°C, one loopful of the contents of each tube of alkaline peptone water was streaked onto CHROMagar vibrio plates (CHROMagar, France) and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. Mauve-purple colonies were purified, and each purified isolate was cryopreserved at −80°C (135 isolates in 2006 and 96 in 2008). From the initial homogenate portion, 100 μl was inoculated onto marine agar (Scharlau, Spain) and onto thiosulfate citrate-bile salts-sucrose agar (Scharlau, Spain) for total heterotrophic marine bacteria counts and total vibrio counts, respectively (Table (Table11).

TABLE 1.

Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates, serotypes, and origins and total number of vibrios/heterotrophic bacteria contained in the bivalvea
IsolateDate of collectionOrganism and site of originTemp (°C)Salinity (‰)Gene(s)SerotypeBacterial count using indicated medium (CFU ml−1)
TCBS agarMarine agar
I7458 August 2006Mg-F24.537tdhND1.5 × 1041.2 × 104
I79314 August 2006Cg-A2535tdhND9.2 × 1028.5 × 103
I80514 August 2006Cg-A2535tdhO2:KUT7.2 × 1029 × 103
I80614 August 2006Cg-A2535tdh and trhO3:K331.9 × 1034.6 × 103
I80914 August 2006Cg-A2535tdhO2:K288 × 1047.3 × 102
I6784 July 2006Rd-A28.636tdhO2:K283.1 × 1052.5 × 105
I6284 July 2006Rd-A28.636tdhO4:KUT2.9 × 1048.4 × 104
I7758 August 2006Cg-A24.537tdhND4.21 × 1031.1 × 104
I6914 July 2006Rd-A28.636trhO1:K322.2 × 1052.6 × 105
I71227 July 2006Mg-A29.435.5trhO1:KUT8.6 × 1038.4 × 103
I7658 August 2006Cg-F24.537trhO4:K341 × 104Uncountable
I98022 July 2008Cg-A26.733.5tdhO1:K322.7 × 1041.3 × 104
I98122 July 2008Cg-A26.733.5trhO1:KUT1 × 1042.2 × 104
I99322 July 2008Cg-A26.733.5tdhO5:K173 × 1031.1 × 104
I99429 July 2008Mg-A27.737trhO3:KUT3.4 × 1037 × 103
I10315 August 2008Cg-F27.737tdhO5:KUT5.5 × 1043.3 × 104
I10345 August 2008Cg-F27.737tdhO3:KUT8.7 × 1044 × 104
I10405 August 2008Cg-F27.737tdhO3:KUT1.6 × 1043.2 × 104
I10425 August 2008Cg-F27.737tdh and trhND2.8 ×1043 × 104
I10505 August 2008Cg-F27.737tdhO1:KUT4.7 × 1047.3 × 104
I106320 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhO3:KUT7.9 ×1041.4 × 104
I106520 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhO2:KUT2.2 × 1031.2 × 104
I106820 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhO5:KUT2.6 × 1045.2 × 104
I106920 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhO3:KUT2.4 × 1035.3 × 104
I107320 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhO5:KUT2.3 × 1037.5 × 103
I107420 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhO3:KUT7.6 × 1046.9 × 104
I107720 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhO4:KUT1.7 × 1031.6 × 103
I107920 August 2008Mg-F25.936trhO3:KUT2.5 × 1031.1 × 104
I109220 August 2008Mg-F25.936tdhND1.7 × 1031.6 × 103
I113025 August 2008Rd-A26.435tdhND1.7 × 1043.8 × 104
I114325 August 2008Rd-A26.435tdhND1.1 × 1041.9 × 104
I116525 August 2008Rd-A26.435trhO2:KUT4.4 × 1046.8 × 104
I113325 August 2008Rp-F25.536.5tdhND3.4 × 1044 × 104
I113425 August 2008Rp-F25.536.5tdhND3.9 × 1045.8 × 104
I115825 August 2008Rp-F25.536.5trhO4:KUT6.6 × 1044.7 × 104
I116125 August 2008Rp-F25.536.5trhO3:KUT2.2 × 1046.6 × 104
Open in a separate windowaMg, Mytilus galloprovincialis; Cg, Crassostrea gigas; Rd, Ruditapes decussatus; Rp, R. phillipinarum; A, Alfacs; F, Fangar; ND, not determined; TCBS, thiosulfate citrate-bile salts-sucrose.Total DNA was extracted from each purified isolate using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega), following the instructions of the manufacturer. A one-step PCR analysis was performed to identify/confirm which isolates were tl positive (species marker for V. parahaemolyticus). Further detection of the tdh or trh gene was carried out on all positive tl strains. All PCR analyses were carried out using the primers described by Bej et al. (2) with the following amplification conditions on the thermocycler (Eppendorf Mastercycler Personal): an initial denaturation at 95°C for 8 min, followed by 40 cycles of a 1-min denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, elongation at 72° for 1 min, and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. Positive and negative controls were included in all reaction mixtures: two positive controls, tl and tdh CAIM 1400 and trh CAIM 1772 (Collection of Aquatic Important Microorganisms [http://www.ciad.mx/caim/CAIM.html]), and negative control DNA-free molecular grade water (Sigma-Aldrich, Spain). Expected amplicons were visualized in 2% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.Fifty-eight isolates contained the gene tl in 2006 and 96 in 2008, which confirmed their identity as V. parahaemolyticus. In 2006, the distribution of the 58 isolates was as follows: 7 from 127 mussels, 34 from 180 oysters, and 17 from 30 R. decussatus clams. No tl-positive isolates were found in R. philippinarum. PCR analysis of the tl-positive isolates for the presence of the tdh or trh gene indicated that eight isolates contained the tdh gene and four contained the trh gene. In 2008, the source of the confirmed V. parahaemolyticus isolates was as follows: 31 from 88 oysters, 44 from 89 mussels, 9 from 30 R. decussatus clams, and 12 from 30 R. philippinarum clams. Of these, 17 were found to contain the tdh gene and 7 contained the trh gene. Two isolates (I806 and I1042) contained both toxigenic genes, tdh and trh.Putative tdh- and trh-positive PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer''s instructions and were sequenced bidirectionally by Macrogen Inc. Sequences were aligned using BioEdit (8) and analyzed using BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information). None of the toxigenic isolates was found positive by PCR analysis for the presence of open reading frame 8 of the phage 237 (16), a marker for the pandemic strain O3:K6.The isolates were fingerprinted by repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR (rep-PCR) as described previously (3), and the resulting electrophoretic band patterns were analyzed with the GelCompar II software (v4.5; Applied Maths). The similarity matrix was calculated with the Jaccard coefficient with a band position tolerance of 0.8%, and the dendrogram was constructed with the Ward algorithm. A high level of genomic diversity was found among the 32 toxigenic isolates characterized by rep-PCR. Three clonal groups were identified (those having identical rep-PCR band patterns) (Fig. 1a to c).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.rep-PCR dendrogram of toxigenic isolates of V. parahaemolyticus isolated in the Ebro delta. Letters denote clonal groups of isolates.In vitro antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed using the diffusion disc test following a previously described protocol (18). The antibiotics used were gentamicin (10 μg), oxolinic acid (10 μg), amoxicillin (25 μg), polymyxin B (300 UI), vancomycin (30 μg), trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), nitrofurantoin (300 μg), doxycyclin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), neomycin (30 UI), penicillin (6 μg), flumequine (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and sulfonamide (300 μg). All tests were performed in duplicate. A Student t test for two samples with unequal variance was performed to compare the sensitivity of all 2006 isolates against the sensitivity of 2008 isolates for each antibiotic (Microsoft Office Excel 97-2003). Antibiogram results revealed a lower susceptibility in 2008 than in 2006, indicating a possible shift in overall susceptibility. Results from the t test indicated that significantly lower susceptibility in 2008 was detected (P ≤ 0.05; n = 36) for the following antibiotics: vancomycin, polymyxin B, ampicillin, amoxicillin, gentamicin, neomycin, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, nitrofurantoin, doxycyclin, ceftazidime, tetracycline, flumequine, and ciprofloxacin.The serological types for 27 strains were determined by the agglutination method using commercially available V. parahaemolyticus antisera (Denka Seiken Ltd.; Cosmos Biomedical Ltd, United Kingdom) following the manufacturer''s instructions. Potentially toxigenic V. parahaemolyticus isolates collected in 2006 were serologically heterogeneous (8 out of the 11 isolates) (Table (Table1).1). In isolates collected in 2008, results were more homogenous, with seven serotypes found among 19 isolates analyzed. The O3:K6 serotype was not detected in any of the strains analyzed, in agreement with the open reading frame 8 PCR results.The present study is the first to report the detection of potentially diarrheal V. parahaemolyticus strains isolated from cultured bivalves on Spanish Mediterranean coasts, providing data on the presence of both tdh- and trh-positive isolates. V. parahaemolyticus has previously been detected in several European countries (4, 13, 21, 22). A recent study carried out in Spain detected tdh-positive V. parahaemolyticus strains from patients who had consumed fresh oysters in a market in Galicia on the Atlantic coast of Spain (12) and potentially pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus strains have also been reported in France (17). These studies indicate that the risk of infections caused by V. parahaemolyticus in Europe is low compared to that in America or Asia (15). However, this risk could have been underestimated, since V. parahaemolyticus is not included in the current European surveillance programs, such as the European Network for Epidemiological Surveillance and Control of Communicable Diseases.Toxigenic V. parahaemolyticus strains detected in this study were genomically and serologically heterogeneous. The pandemic serotype O3:K6 was not detected, and although attempts to isolate O3:K6 from the environment and from seafood have not always been successful in previous studies reviewed by Nair and coauthors (15), this finding seems to be in agreement with the fact that no outbreak of diarrhea was observed in the area. Interestingly, isolates I806 and I1042 have been found positive for both tdh and trh in PCR tests. The coexistence of tdh and trh genes has already been reported in isolates from Japan, the United States, and Mexico (3, 6, 11, 19, 23). To our knowledge, no occurrence of an environmental isolate positive for both tdh and trh had previously been reported in Europe. All isolates tested were slightly different in their antibiotic resistance profiles. Typically, a high level of resistance could be determined. The detection of tdh- and/or trh-positive V. parahaemolyticus strains for the first time on the Mediterranean coast emphasizes the need to monitor for the presence of potentially diarrheal vibrios and bacterial gastroenteritis, and these data should be taken into consideration to revise the European legislation on the requirements for shellfish harvested for consumption in order to include the surveillance of these pathogens in Europe.  相似文献   

19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号